不同施肥措施对华北潮土区玉米田土壤固碳细菌群落结构多样性的影响

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.04.009

生态环境学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 715-722.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.04.009

不同施肥措施对华北潮土区玉米田土壤固碳细菌群落结构多样性的影响

刘红梅(), 海香, 安克锐, 张海芳, 王慧, 张艳军, 王丽丽, 张贵龙, 杨殿林

农业农村部环境保护科研监测所,天津 300191

收稿日期:2021-11-22 出版日期:2022-04-18 发布日期:2022-06-22
作者简介:刘红梅（1976年生）,女,副研究员,主要从事生物多样性与生态农业研究。E-mail: liuhongmei@caas.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD0800905-3)

Effects of Different Fertilization Regimes on Community Structure Diversity of CO₂-assimilating Bacteria in Maize Field of Fluvo-aquic Soil in North China

LIU Hongmei(), HAI Xiang, AN Kerui, ZHANG Haifang, WANH Hui, ZHANG Yanjun, WANG Lili, ZHANG Guilong, YANG Dianlin

Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300191, P. R. China

Received:2021-11-22 Online:2022-04-18 Published:2022-06-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究不同施肥措施下华北潮土区玉米田土壤固碳细菌群落特征及其影响因子,为华北地区可持续施肥管理提供理论依据和数据支持。以农业农村部环境保护科研监测所建立的武清长期定位试验站为平台,利用高通量测序技术,研究6种不同施肥处理[不施肥对照 (A0)、单施有机肥 (A1)、氮肥减量配施有机肥 (A2)、常量化肥配施有机肥 (A3)、氮肥增量配施有机肥 (A4) 和单施化肥 (A5)]对华北潮土区土壤固碳细菌结构及多样性的影响。结果表明,（1）与对照A0相比,A1和A3处理提高了Shannon多样性指数,A4和A5处降低了Shannon多样性指数。（2）群落组成方面,在门水平上,变形菌门（Proteobacteria）（92.83%—4.98%）为优势菌门;与对照A0相比,A4和A5处理显著降低了变形菌门相对丰度,A1、A2和A3无显著差异。在纲水平上,优势菌纲为γ-变形菌纲Gammaproteobacteria（53.75%—65.80%）;与对照A0相比,A2、A3、A4和A5处理显著降低了γ-变形菌纲相对丰度,A1处理与对照A0无显著差异。（3）主成分分析表明,5个施肥处理OTUs与对照处理差别显著,且A3、A4和A5处理与对照A0、A1和A2处于不同排序区。（4）冗余分析结果表明,土壤pH、全氮、全磷、硝态氮、铵态氮、微生物量碳和微生物量氮与土壤cbbL细菌群落结构变化显著相关。以上结果表明,长期氮肥增量配施有机肥和单施化肥可能降低土壤固碳细菌群落多样性;不同施肥措施通过改变土壤化学性质,影响了土壤固碳细菌群落结构。

关键词: 施肥措施, 潮土, 固碳细菌, cbbL基因, 群落结构, 高通量测序

Abstract:

To reveal the characteristics and influencing factors of different long-term fertilization regimes on the community structure of CO₂-assimilating bacteria in the maize field in North China in order to provide a theoretical basis and data support for sustainable fertilization management in North China. This study was conducted in the Wuqing Experimental Station of the Agro-Environmental Protection Institute of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. The field experiment included six treatments, no fertilizer (A0), organic fertilizer (A1), reduced nitrogen fertilizer plus organic fertilizer (A2), normal chemical fertilizer plus organic fertilizer treatment (A3), increased nitrogen fertilizer plus organic fertilizer (A4), and chemical fertilizer (A5). Soil samples were collected independently from the 0?20 cm soil layer. High-throughput sequencing technology was applied to test the changes in the soil community structure diversity of CO₂-assimilating bacteria under different fertilization treatments. The results showed that (1) compared with the A0 treatment, A1 and A3 increased the Shannon index, and A4 and A5 decreased the Shannon index. (2) In terms of the community composition, the dominant bacterial phyla was Proteobacteria (92.83%?94.98%); Compared with the A0 treatment, A4 and A5 significantly reduced the relative abundance of Proteobacteria, while A1, A2 and A3 showed no significant difference. The dominant bacterial class was Gammaproteobacteria (53.75%?65.80%); Compared with the A0 treatment, A2, A3, A4 and A5 significantly reduced the relative abundance of Gammaproteobacteria, but A1 showed no significant difference. (3) The results of the principal component analysis showed that the OTUs of the five fertilization treatments were significantly different from that of the control, and A3, A4 and A5 treatments were in different sorting regions from the controls, A0, A1, and A2. (4) The results of redundancy analysis indicated that soil pH, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, nitrate nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen, microbial biomass carbon, and microbial biomass nitrogen were significantly correlated with the soil cbbL-harboring bacterial community structure. In conclusion, long-term incremental application of the nitrogen fertilizer plus organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer could reduce the diversity of the soil carbon sequestration bacterial community; Different fertilization measures affected the community structure of soil carbon sequestration bacteria by changing soil chemical properties.

Key words: fertilization regimes, fluvo-aquic soil, CO₂-assimilating bacteria, cbbL gene, community structure, high-throughput sequencing

中图分类号:

S154.1
X176

刘红梅, 海香, 安克锐, 张海芳, 王慧, 张艳军, 王丽丽, 张贵龙, 杨殿林. 不同施肥措施对华北潮土区玉米田土壤固碳细菌群落结构多样性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 715-722.

LIU Hongmei, HAI Xiang, AN Kerui, ZHANG Haifang, WANH Hui, ZHANG Yanjun, WANG Lili, ZHANG Guilong, YANG Dianlin. Effects of Different Fertilization Regimes on Community Structure Diversity of CO₂-assimilating Bacteria in Maize Field of Fluvo-aquic Soil in North China[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(4): 715-722.

图/表 6

参考文献 27

[1]	BERG I A, 2011. Ecological aspects of the distribution of different autotrophic CO₂ fixation pathways[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77(6): 1925-1936. DOI URL
[2]	HUANG X Z, WANG C, LIU Q, et al., 2018. Abundance of microbial C0₂-fixing genes during the late rice season in a long-term management paddy field amended with straw and straw-derived biochar[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 98(2): 306-316. DOI URL
[3]	KARL-HEINZ E, SEBASTIAAN L, PATRICK M, et al., 2017. Land management: Data availability and process understanding for global change studies[J]. Global Change Biology, 23(2): 512-533. DOI URL
[4]	NANBA K, KING G M, DUNFIELD K, 2004. Analysis of facultative lithotroph distribution and diversity on volcanic deposits by use of the large subunit of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70(4):2245-2253. DOI URL
[5]	QIN J, LI M, ZHANG H F, et al., 2021. Nitrogen Deposition Reduces the Diversity and Abundance of cbbL Gene-Containing CO₂-Fixing Microorganisms in the Soil of the Stipa baicalensis Steppe[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.570908. DOI
[6]	SELESI D, SCHMID M, HARTMANN A, 2005. Diversity of green-like and red-like ribulose-1.5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large- subunit genes (cbbL) in differently managed agricultural soils[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 171(1): 175-184.
[7]	SMITH P, 2004, Carbon sequestration in croplands: the potential in Europe and the global context[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 20(3): 229-236. DOI URL
[8]	STOCKDALE E A, SHEPHERD M A, FORTUNE S, et al., 2002. Soil fertility in organic farming systems-fundamentally different?[J]. Soil Use and Management, 18(1): 301-308.
[9]	TOLLI J, KING G M, 2005. Diversity and structure of bacterial chemolithotrophic communities in pine forest and agroecosystem soils[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71(12): 8411-8418. DOI URL
[10]	XIAO K Q, BAO P, BAO Q L, et al., 2014. Quantitative analyses of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) large-subunit genes (cbbL) in typical paddy soils[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 87(1): 89-101. DOI URL
[11]	YUAN H Z, GE T D, WU X H, et al., 2012. Long-term field fertilization alters the diversity of autotrophic bacteria based on the ribulose-1, 5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) large-subunit genes in paddy soil[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 95(4): 1061-1071. DOI URL
[12]	YUAN H Z, GE T D, ZOU S Y, et al., 2013. Effect of land use on the abundance and diversity of autotrophic bacteria as measured by ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) large subunit gene abundance in soils[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 49(5): 609-616. DOI URL
[13]	ZHAO K, KONG W D, WANG F, et al., 2018. Desert and steppe soils exhibit lower autotrophic microbial abundance but higher atmospheric C0₂fixation capacity than meadow soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 127: 230-238. DOI URL
[14]	ZHOU Z F, WEI W L, SHI X J, et al., 2019. Twenty-six years of chemical fertilization decreased soil RubisCO activity and changed the ecological characteristics of soil cbbL-carrying bacteria in an entisol[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 141: 1-9. DOI URL
[15]	鲍士旦, 2000. 土壤农化分析[M]. 第3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社.
	BAO S D, 2000. Soil and agriculture chemistry analysis[M]. 3rd Edition. Beijing: China Agriculture Press.
[16]	陈晓娟, 吴小红, 简燕, 等, 2014. 农田土壤自养微生物碳同化潜力及其功能基因数量、关键酶活性分析[J]. 环境科学, 35(3): 1144-1150.
	CHEN X J, WU X H, JIAN Y, et al., 2014. Carbon dioxide assimilation potential, functional gene amount and RubisCO activity of autotrophic microorganisms in agricultural soils[J]. Environmental Science, 35(3): 1144-1150.
[17]	戴雅婷, 闫志坚, 解继红, 等, 2017. 基于高通量测序的两种植被恢复类型根际土壤细菌多样性研究[J]. 土壤学报, 54(3): 735-748.
	DAI Y T, YAN Z J, XIE J H, et al., 2017. Soil bacteria diversity in rhizosphere under two types of vegetation restoration based on high throughput sequencing[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 54(3): 735-748.
[18]	俄胜哲, 丁宁平, 李利利, 等, 2018. 长期施肥条件下黄土高原黑垆土作物产量与土壤碳氮的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 29(12): 4047-4055.
	E S Z, DING N P, LI L L, et al., 2018. Relationship of crop yield and soil organic carbon and nitrogen under long-term fertilization in black loessial soil region on the Loess Plateau in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29(12): 4047-4055.
[19]	高静, SAID M, 岳琳艳, 等, 2018. 藏北高原草甸土壤固碳微生物群落特征随海拔和季节的变化[J]. 生态学报, 38(11): 3816-3824.
	GAO J, SAID M, YU L Y, et al., 2018. Changes in CO₂-fixing microbial community characteristics with elevation and season in alpine meadow soils on the northern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(11): 3816-3824.
[20]	李倩, 马琨, 冶秀香, 等, 2018. 不同培肥方式对土壤有机碳与微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 26(12): 1866-1875.
	LI Q, MA K, YE X X, et al., 2018. Effect of fertilization managements on soil organic carbon and microbial community structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 26(12): 1866-1875.
[21]	刘红梅, 安克锐, 王慧, 等, 2020. 不同施肥措施对华北潮土区玉米田土壤微生物碳源代谢多样性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 39(10): 2336-2344.
	LIU H M, AN K R, WANG H, et al., 2020. Effects of fertilization regimes on the metabolic diversity of microbial carbon sources in a maize field of fluvo-aquic soil in North China[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 39(10):2336-2344.
[22]	刘茗, 曹林桦, 刘彩霞, 等, 2021. 亚热带4种典型森林植被土壤固碳细菌群落结构及数量特征[J]. 土壤学报, 58(4): 1028-1039.
	LIU M, CAO L H, LIU C X, et al., 2021. Characterization of population and community structure of carbon-sequestration bacteria in soils under four types of forest vegetations typical of subtropical zone[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 58(4): 1028-1039.
[23]	刘琼, 魏晓梦, 吴小红, 等, 2017. 稻田土壤固碳功能微生物群落结构和数量特征[J]. 环境科学, 38(2): 760-768.
	LIU Q, WEI X M, WU X H, et al., 2017. Characteristic of abundances and diversity of carbon dioxide fixation microbes in paddy soils[J]. Environmental Science, 38(2): 760-768.
[24]	陆海飞, 郑金伟, 余喜初, 等, 2015. 长期无机有机肥配施对红壤性水稻土微生物群落多样性及酶活性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 21(3): 632-643.
	LU H F, ZENG J W, YU X C, et al., 2015. Microbial community diversity and enzyme activity of red paddy soil under long-term combined inorganic-organic fertilization[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 21(3): 632-643.
[25]	苏鑫, 郭迎岚, 卢嫚, 等, 2020. 3种碳添加对退化农田土壤固碳细菌群落结构多样性的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 40(1): 234-241.
	SU X, GUO Y L, LU M, et al., 2020. Effects of three kinds of carbon addition on community structure diversity of CO₂-assimilating bacterial in degraded farmland soil[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 40(1): 234-241.
[26]	吴金水, 林启美, 黄巧云, 等,. 2006. 土壤微生物生物量测定方法及其应用[M]. 北京: 气象出版社.
	WU J S, LIN Q M, HUANG Q Y, et al., 2006. Method for measuring soil microbial biomass and its application[M]. Beijing: China Meteorological Press.
[27]	张双双, 靳振江, 贾远航, 等, 2019. 岩溶地区不同土地利用方式土壤固碳细菌群落结构特征[J]. 环境科学, 40(1): 412-420.
	ZHANG S S, JIN Z J, JIA Y H, et al., 2019. Community structure of CO₂-fixing soil bacteria from different land use types in Karst areas[J]. Environmental Science, 40(1): 412-420. DOI URL

施肥处理 Fertilizationtreatments	pH	有机碳质量分数 w_{(total organic carbon)}/ (g∙kg^-1)	全氮质量分数 w_{(total nitrogen)}/ (g∙kg^-1)	全磷质量分数 w_{(total phosphorus)}/ (g∙kg^-1)	硝态氮质量分数 w_{(nitrate-nitrogen)}/ (mg∙kg^-1)	铵态氮质量分数 w_{(ammonium-nitrogen)}/ (mg∙kg^-1)	微生物量碳质量分数 w_{(microbial biomass carbon)}/ (mg∙kg^-1)	微生物量氮质量分数 w_{(microbial biomass nitrogen)}/ (mg∙kg^-1)
A0	8.71±0.03a	8.97±0.11d	1.23±0.18e	0.98±0.01d	6.39±0.10e	1.17±0.08c	365.97±32.76d	69.12±6.04b
A1	8.47±0.09bc	11.03±0.19b	2.08±0.04bc	1.54±0.03c	8.34±0.28d	1.22±0.08c	433.49±57.76cd	86.62±11.14a
A2	8.52±0.04b	9.94±0.30c	1.96±0.01c	1.55±0.04c	10.29±0.23c	1.70±0.22a	530.46±25.20ab	97.88±12.30a
A3	8.29±0.10de	11.37±0.25b	2.21±0.07b	1.64±0.03b	11.00±0.07bc	1.62±0.22ab	466.44±30.10bc	94.79±0.37a
A4	8.19±0.07e	12.28±0.29a	2.43±0.09a	1.89±0.01a	12.77±0.32a	1.37±0.13bc	557.25±53.33a	89.06±6.33a
A5	8.39±0.03cd	8.08±0.14e	1.64±0.21d	1.02±0.01d	11.39±0.97b	1.70±0.13a	389.52±10.71d	68.89±4.94b

施肥处理 Fertilizationtreatments	pH	有机碳质量分数 w_{(total organic carbon)}/ (g∙kg^-1)	全氮质量分数 w_{(total nitrogen)}/ (g∙kg^-1)	全磷质量分数 w_{(total phosphorus)}/ (g∙kg^-1)	硝态氮质量分数 w_{(nitrate-nitrogen)}/ (mg∙kg^-1)	铵态氮质量分数 w_{(ammonium-nitrogen)}/ (mg∙kg^-1)	微生物量碳质量分数 w_{(microbial biomass carbon)}/ (mg∙kg^-1)	微生物量氮质量分数 w_{(microbial biomass nitrogen)}/ (mg∙kg^-1)
A0	8.71±0.03a	8.97±0.11d	1.23±0.18e	0.98±0.01d	6.39±0.10e	1.17±0.08c	365.97±32.76d	69.12±6.04b
A1	8.47±0.09bc	11.03±0.19b	2.08±0.04bc	1.54±0.03c	8.34±0.28d	1.22±0.08c	433.49±57.76cd	86.62±11.14a
A2	8.52±0.04b	9.94±0.30c	1.96±0.01c	1.55±0.04c	10.29±0.23c	1.70±0.22a	530.46±25.20ab	97.88±12.30a
A3	8.29±0.10de	11.37±0.25b	2.21±0.07b	1.64±0.03b	11.00±0.07bc	1.62±0.22ab	466.44±30.10bc	94.79±0.37a
A4	8.19±0.07e	12.28±0.29a	2.43±0.09a	1.89±0.01a	12.77±0.32a	1.37±0.13bc	557.25±53.33a	89.06±6.33a
A5	8.39±0.03cd	8.08±0.14e	1.64±0.21d	1.02±0.01d	11.39±0.97b	1.70±0.13a	389.52±10.71d	68.89±4.94b

处理 Fertilization treatments	pH	有机碳 Total organic carbon	全氮 Total nitrogen	全磷 Total phosphorus	硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen	铵态氮 Ammonium nitrogen	微生物量碳 Microbial biomass carbon	微生物量氮 Microbial biomass nitrogen
Chao1指数 Chao1 index	0.074	0.169	0.074	0.175	0.031	0.124	0.058	0.122
Observed_species指数 Observed_species index	0.025	0.188	0.049	0.148	0.035	0.119	-0.059	-0.014
PD_whole_tree指数 PD_whole_tree index	-0.038	0.084	-0.160	-0.060	-0.019	-0.170	-0.106	-0.291
Shannon指数 Shannon index	0.447^*	0.140	-0.030	0.147	-0.521^**	-0.187	-0.008	0.313

处理 Fertilization treatments	pH	有机碳 Total organic carbon	全氮 Total nitrogen	全磷 Total phosphorus	硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen	铵态氮 Ammonium nitrogen	微生物量碳 Microbial biomass carbon	微生物量氮 Microbial biomass nitrogen
Chao1指数 Chao1 index	0.074	0.169	0.074	0.175	0.031	0.124	0.058	0.122
Observed_species指数 Observed_species index	0.025	0.188	0.049	0.148	0.035	0.119	-0.059	-0.014
PD_whole_tree指数 PD_whole_tree index	-0.038	0.084	-0.160	-0.060	-0.019	-0.170	-0.106	-0.291
Shannon指数 Shannon index	0.447^*	0.140	-0.030	0.147	-0.521^**	-0.187	-0.008	0.313

不同施肥措施对华北潮土区玉米田土壤固碳细菌群落结构多样性的影响

Effects of Different Fertilization Regimes on Community Structure Diversity of CO₂-assimilating Bacteria in Maize Field of Fluvo-aquic Soil in North China

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	侯晖, 颜培轩, 谢沁宓, 赵宏亮, 庞丹波, 陈林, 李学斌, 胡杨, 梁咏亮, 倪细炉. 贺兰山蒙古扁桃灌丛根际土壤AM真菌群落多样性特征研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(5): 857-865.
[2]	姜永伟, 丁振军, 袁俊斌, 张峥, 李杨, 问青春, 王业耀, 金小伟. 辽宁省主要河流底栖动物群落结构及水质评价研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(5): 969-979.
[3]	王云, 郑西来, 曹敏, 李磊, 宋晓冉, 林晓宇, 郭凯. 滨海含水层咸-淡水过渡带反硝化性能与控制因素研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(5): 980-988.
[4]	寇祝, 卿纯, 袁昌果, 李平. 西藏东北部热泉水中硫氧化菌的多样性及分布特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(5): 989-1000.
[5]	胡芳, 刘聚涛, 温春云, 韩柳, 文慧. 抚河流域浮游植物群落结构特征及其水生态状况评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(4): 744-755.
[6]	于菲, 曾海龙, 房怀阳, 付玲芳, 林澍, 董家豪. 典型感潮河网浮游藻类功能群时空变化特征及水质评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(4): 756-765.
[7]	盛美君, 李胜君, 杨昕玥, 王蕊, 李洁, 李刚, 修伟明. 华北潮土农田土壤酶活性对土地利用强度的响应特征探讨[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(2): 299-308.
[8]	王礼霄, 刘晋仙, 柴宝峰. 华北亚高山土壤细菌群落及氮循环对退耕还草的响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(8): 1537-1546.
[9]	朱奕豪, 李青梅, 刘晓丽, 李娜, 宋凤玲, 陈为峰. 不同土地整治类型新增耕地土壤微生物群落特征研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(5): 909-917.
[10]	王英成, 姚世庭, 金鑫, 俞文政, 芦光新, 王军邦. 三江源区高寒退化草甸土壤细菌多样性的对比研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 695-703.
[11]	杨贤房, 陈朝, 郑林, 万智巍, 陈永林, 王远东. 稀土矿区不同土地利用类型土壤细菌群落特征及网络分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 793-801.
[12]	夏开, 邓鹏飞, 马锐豪, 王斐, 温正宇, 徐小牛. 马尾松次生林转换为湿地松和杉木林对土壤细菌群落结构和多样性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(3): 460-469.
[13]	宋秀丽, 黄瑞龙, 柯彩杰, 黄蔚, 章武, 陶波. 不同种植方式对连作土壤细菌群落结构和多样性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(3): 487-496.
[14]	杨虎, 王佩瑶, 李小伟, 王继飞, 杨君珑. 贺兰山东坡不同植被类型的土壤真菌多样性及其群落结构[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(2): 239-247.
[15]	李聪, 吕晶花, 陆梅, 杨志东, 刘攀, 任玉连, 杜凡. 滇东南亚热带土壤细菌群落对植被垂直带变化的响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(10): 1971-1983.

不同施肥措施对华北潮土区玉米田土壤固碳细菌群落结构多样性的影响

Effects of Different Fertilization Regimes on Community Structure Diversity of CO2-assimilating Bacteria in Maize Field of Fluvo-aquic Soil in North China

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

Effects of Different Fertilization Regimes on Community Structure Diversity of CO₂-assimilating Bacteria in Maize Field of Fluvo-aquic Soil in North China