广东省江门市耕地土壤矿质养分特征及差异

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2025.01.006

生态环境学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 46-55.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2025.01.006

广东省江门市耕地土壤矿质养分特征及差异

黄连喜¹(), 王泽煌², 田利华², 赵景鹏², 陈伟盛¹, 林启美¹, 黄庆¹, 魏岚¹^,^*()

1.广东省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所/农业农村部南方植物营养与肥料重点实验室/广东省农业资源循环利用与耕地保育重点实验室，广东广州 510640
2.江门市农业科技创新中心，广东江门 529100

收稿日期:2024-06-21 出版日期:2025-01-18 发布日期:2025-01-21
通讯作者: * 魏岚。E-mail: 441004456@qq.com
作者简介:黄连喜（1982年生），女，副研究员，硕士，主要从事耕地土壤地力提升、农产品质量安全调控及土壤污染修复治理等研究工作。E-mail: hlx4@163.com
基金资助:
广东省农业农村厅2022年广东省省级涉农项目(107000068-2022-0000176609)

Characteristics and Differences of Soil Mineral Nutrients in Jiangmen City, Guangdong Province

HUANG Lianxi¹(), WANG Zehuang², TIAN Lihua², ZHAO Jingpeng², CHEN Weisheng¹, LIN Qimei¹, HUANG Qing¹, WEI Lan¹^,^*()

1. Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer in South Region, Ministry of Agriculture/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nutrient Cycling and Farmland Conservation, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China
2. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Center of Jiangmen City, Jiangmen 529099, P. R. China

Received:2024-06-21 Online:2025-01-18 Published:2025-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

土壤矿质养分是评价土壤肥力的重要指标，是土壤供给作物生长的必需营养元素。为实现化肥减量增效、农作物合理施肥及耕地土壤质量提升目标，对江门市主要作物的耕地土壤进行矿质养分调查分析。结果表明，江门市耕地土壤pH均值5.60，超过45%的耕地土壤酸化严重，茄果与瓜类蔬菜地、果园及稻田土壤酸性较强，恩平市及蓬江/江海地区土壤pH明显高于其他县区。土壤有机质平均质量分数为26.4 g∙kg⁻¹，以新会区及果园土壤最高，恩平市最低。碱解氮和速效钾均值分别为120 mg∙kg⁻¹和136 mg∙kg⁻¹，新会区、蓬江/江海区及果园土壤最高，恩平市最低。74.5%样点的土壤有效磷含量达到极丰富水平，均值为123 mg∙kg⁻¹。土壤交换性钙、交换性镁质量摩尔浓度与有效硼、有效硅质量分数均值分别为2.02 cmol∙kg⁻¹、0.650 cmol∙kg⁻¹、0.650 mg∙kg⁻¹和132 mg∙kg⁻¹，仅新会区、蓬江/江海区及果园土壤含量稍高。不同作物及县区间的土壤pH变异性较弱，变异系数为9.43%—17.0%，有机质、碱解氮、有效硼和有效硅含量变异性中等，变异系数为20.4%—86.6%，有效磷、速效钾、交换性钙和交换性镁含量变异性较强，变异系数为55.4%—143%。与第二次土壤普查结果相比，江门市耕地土壤具有酸化加剧的趋势，有效磷含量极显著提升，有机质、碱解氮和速效钾含量有所提升。江门市耕地土壤有机质和碱解氮含量中等偏高水平，速效钾，有效硼和有效硅含量偏低，交换性钙和交换性镁缺乏。江门地区整体土壤矿质养分差异明显，不同作物及区域间土壤矿质养分差异不可忽视，需按照“控氮、减磷、提质、增钾、稳硼硅、补钙镁”的总体原则，推广测土配方及精准平衡施肥。

关键词: 江门市, 耕地, 土壤, 矿质养分, 变异性

Abstract:

Soil mineral nutrients are important indices for evaluating soil fertility, and are essential nutrient elements for the soil to supply crops. To reduce fertilizer amount and increase efficiency, rational fertilization of crops and improving soil quality of cultivated land, mineral nutrients in cultivated land soil of the main crops in Jiangmen City were investigated and analyzed. The results showed that the average pH of the cultivated soil in Jiangmen was 5.60 and more than 45% of the cultivated soil was acidified. Soil acidity in eggplant and melon vegetable fields, orchards, and paddy fields was stronger. The soil pH in Enping City and Pengjiang/Jianghai was significantly higher than that in other districts. The average soil organic matter content was 26.4 g∙kg⁻¹, with the highest values in Xinhui District and orchard soil, and the lowest in Enping City. The average values of alkali-hydrolytic nitrogen and available potassium content were 120 mg∙kg⁻¹ and 136 mg∙kg⁻¹, respectively, with the highest values in the Xinhui District, Pengjiang/Jianghai District, and orchard soils, and the lowest in Enping City. The available phosphorus content in 74.5% of the soil samples was very high, with an average value of 123 mg∙kg⁻¹.The mean values of exchangeable calcium, exchangeable magnesium, available boron and available silicon in soils were 2.02 cmol∙kg⁻¹, 0.650 cmol∙kg⁻¹, 0.650 mg∙kg⁻¹ and 132 mg∙kg⁻¹, respectively, with slightly higher contents only in Xinhui District, Pengjiang/Jianghai District and orchard. The variability of pH value was weak; organic matter, alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen, available boron, and available silicon content were moderate; and available phosphorus, available potassium, exchangeable calcium, and exchangeable magnesium content were strong in the soil of different crops and districts, with coefficients of variation ranging from 9.43% to 17.0%, 20.4% to 86.6%, and 55.4% to 143%, respectively. Compared with the results of the second soil survey, the cultivated soil in Jiangmen showed increased acidification, significantly increased available phosphorus content, and slightly increased organic matter, alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen, and available potassium content. In Jiangmen, the contents of organic matter and alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen were medium-high, the contents of available potassium, available boron, and available silicon were low, and the contents of exchangeable calcium and exchangeable magnesium were lacking. Therefore, the differences in mineral nutrients in the Jiangmen area are evident, and the differences in soil mineral nutrients in different crops and regions cannot be ignored. It is necessary for Jiangmen City to promote soil testing formula and precise balanced fertilization according to the overall principle of “controlling nitrogen, reducing phosphorus, improving organic matter, increasing potassium, stabilizing borosilicate, and supplementing calcium and magnesium”.

Key words: Jiangmen City, cultivated land, soil, mineral nutrients, variability

中图分类号:

S153.6
X144

黄连喜, 王泽煌, 田利华, 赵景鹏, 陈伟盛, 林启美, 黄庆, 魏岚. 广东省江门市耕地土壤矿质养分特征及差异[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(1): 46-55.

HUANG Lianxi, WANG Zehuang, TIAN Lihua, ZHAO Jingpeng, CHEN Weisheng, LIN Qimei, HUANG Qing, WEI Lan. Characteristics and Differences of Soil Mineral Nutrients in Jiangmen City, Guangdong Province[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2025, 34(1): 46-55.

图/表 10

参考文献 30

[1]	CHANG D, LI S, LAI Z Q, 2023. Effects of extreme precipitation intensity and duration on the runoff and nutrient yields[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 626(Part A): 130281.
[2]	JABBOROVA D, SAYYED R Z, AZIMOV A, et al., 2021. Impact of mineral fertilizers on mineral nutrients in the ginger rhizome and on soil enzymes activities and soil properties[J]. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(9):5268-5274. DOI PMID
[3]	JOHNSON D W, TURNER J, 2019. Tamm Review: Nutrient cycling in forests: A historical look and newer developments[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 444:344-373. DOI
[4]	LI C, YANG J, LI Z M, et al., 2023. Integrating crop and soil nutrient management for higher wheat grain yield and protein concentration in dryland areas[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 147:126827.
[5]	LUNA E, JOUANY C, CASTAÑEDA C, 2019. Soil composition and plant nutrients at the interface between crops and saline wetlands in arid environments in NE Spain[J]. CATENA, 173:384-393.
[6]	MA Y Q, WOOLF D, FAN M S, et al., 2023. Global crop production increase by soil organic carbon[J]. Nature Geoscience, 16(12):1159-1165.
[7]	MALONE Z, BERHE A A, RYALS R, et al., 2023. Impacts of organic matter amendments on urban soil carbon and soil quality: A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 419:138148.
[8]	PENG X D, DAI Q H, DING G J, et al., 2019. Role of underground leakage in soil, water and nutrient loss from a rock-mantled slope in the karst rocky desertification area[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 578:124086.
[9]	SELVAM R, SANTHI R, MARAGATHAM S, et al., 2022. Targeted yield model-based balanced nutrient recommendation for barnyard millet on inceptisol of Tamil Nadu[J]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 56(6):638-645.
[10]	SUN Y Y, ZHANG N N, YAN J K, et al., 2020. Effects of soft rock and biochar applications on millet (Setaria italica L.) crop performance in sandy soil[J]. Agronomy, 10(5):669.
[11]	WANG M M, TAVAKKOLI E, RENGASAMY P, et al., 2021. Management zone delineation based on soil properties measured during the reproductive stage of rice in the field[J]. Land Degradation and Development, 32(10):3106-3121.
[12]	YAHAYA S M, MAHMUD A A, ABDULLAHI M, et al., 2023. Recent advances in the chemistry of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium as fertilizers in soil: A review[J]. Pedosphere, 33(3):385-406.
[13]	阿丽娅·阿力木, 丛小涵, 夏晓莹, 等, 2022. 不同土地利用方式下土壤养分特征变化分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 59(4):925-933. DOI
	ALIYA A, CONG X H, XIA X Y, et al., 2022. Characteristics of soil nutrient under different land use patterns[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Seiences, 59(4):925-933.
[14]	董一漩, 屠乃美, 魏征, 等, 2019. 施肥模式对不同基础地力稻田培肥和水稻产量的动态影响[J]. 东北农业科学, 44(2):13-18, 33.
	DONG Y X, TU N M, WEI Z, et al., 2019. The dynamic effects of fertilization mode on fertilization and rice yield in paddy fields with different basic fertility[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 44(2):1-18, 33.
[15]	广东省土壤普查办公室, 1993. 广东土壤[M]. 北京: 科学出版社.
	Soil Census Office of Guangdong Province, 1993. Guangdong soil[M]. Beijing: Science Press.
[16]	胡建新, 汪莹, 彭成林, 等, 2011. 攀枝花烟区土壤交换性钙、镁含量评价[J]. 西南农业学报, 24(4):1415-1418.
	HU J X, WANG Y, PENG C L, et al., 2011. Evaluation of soil exchangeable calcium and magnesium in Panzhihua tobacco-growing areas[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 24(4):1415-1418.
[17]	黄志鹏, 李龙承, 吴海宁, 等, 2017. 增施钙肥对酸性旱地幼龄果园间作花生的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 39(5):693-697. DOI
	HUANG Z P, LI L C, WU H N, et al., 2017. Effects of calcium fertilizer on intercropping peanut in acid young orchard soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 39(5):693-697.
[18]	江叶枫, 钟珊, 李婕, 等, 2018. 近30年余干县耕地土壤碳氮比时空变异特征及其影响因素[J]. 环境科学, 39(3):1386-1395.
	JIANG Y F, ZHONG S, LI J, et al., 2018. Spatial and temporal variability of soil c-to-n ratio of Yugan county and its influencing factors in the past 30 years[J]. Environmental Science, 39(3):1386-1395.
[19]	李丹萍, 刘敦一, 张白鸽, 等, 2018. 不同镁肥在中国南方三种缺镁土壤中的迁移和淋洗特征[J]. 土壤学报, 55(6):1513-1524.
	LI D P, LIU D Y, ZHANG B G, et al., 2018. Movement and leaching of magnesium fertilizers in three types of magnesium-deficient soils in south China relative to fertilizer type[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 55(6):1513-1524.
[20]	王巍巍, 魏春雁, 张之鑫, 等, 2016. 不同种稻年限盐碱地水田表层土壤酶活性变化及其与土壤养分关系[J]. 东北农业科学, 41(4):43-48.
	WANG W W, WEI C Y, ZHANG Z X, et al., 2016. Studies on changes of surface layer soil enzyme in saline- alkali paddy field of different planting years and relationship between soil enzyme changes and soil nutrients[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 41(4):43-48.
[21]	王校辉, 2021. 河南省平顶山市耕地土壤养分状况及聚类分析[J]. 东北农业科学, 46(3):37-40.
	WANG X H, 2021. Soil nutrient status and cluster analysis of cultivated land in Pingdingshan city of Henan province[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 46(3):37-40.
[22]	薛雪, 毛宇鹏, 张洪, 2023. 珠三角典型区域农田小区尺度氮、磷、镉、砷输移特征与控制对策[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 13(3):1179-1186.
	XUE X, MAO Y P, ZHANG H, 2023. Transport fluxes of nitrogen, phosphorus, cadmium and arsenic at farmland plot scale in the typical areas of Pearl River Delta region[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 13(3):1179-1186.
[23]	杨东, 刘晓霞, 陈红金, 等, 2023. 定额制施肥对土壤及生态环境影响的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 39(32):91-98. DOI
	YANG D, LIU X X, CHEN H J, et al., 2023. Effeet of quota-based fertilization on soil and ecological environment: Research progress[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 39(32):91-98.
[24]	张竞, 苗晋杰, 裴艳东, 等, 2018. 潮白河中游冲积平原土壤养分空间变异特征及其影响因素[J]. 土壤通报, 49(6):1436-1444.
	ZHANG J, MIAO J J, PEI Y D, et al., 2018. Spatial variability of soil nutrient and its controlling factors in the middle reaches of Chaobai River[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 49(6):1436-1444.
[25]	张宁宁, 白雪, 欧阳小雪, 等, 2023. 土壤因子与农产品品质关系研究进展[J]. 中国无机分析化学, 13(6):513-523.
	ZHANG N N, BAI X, OUYANG X X, et al., 2023. Research progress on the relationship between soilfactors and agricultural product quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Analytical Chemistry, 13(6):513-523.
[26]	郑立臣, 宇万太, 马强, 等, 2004. 农田土壤肥力综合评价研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 23(5):156-161.
	ZHENG L C, YU W T, MA Q, et al., 2004. Advances in the integrated evaluation of farmland fertility[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 23(5):156-161.
[27]	周海燕, 徐明岗, 蔡泽江, 等, 2019. 湖南祁阳县土壤酸化主要驱动因素贡献解析[J]. 中国农业科学, 52(8):1400-1412. DOI
	ZHOU H Y, XU M G, CAI Z J, et al., 2019. Quantitative analysis of driving-factors of soil acidification in Qiyang county, Hunan province[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 52(8):1400-1412. DOI
[28]	周敏, 杨国顺, 2019. 葡萄园土壤养分状况分析与肥力评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 47(22):164-169.
	ZHOU M, YANG G S, 2019. Soil fertility analysis and evaluation of v. Davidii foëx vineyard[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 47(22):164-169.
[29]	朱梓弘, 杨程, 谢银财, 等, 2018. 重度石漠化区不同土地利用方式下土壤养分特征[J]. 中国岩溶, 37(6):842-849.
	ZHU Z H, YANG C, XIE Y C, et al., 2018. Characteristics of soil nutrient in karst rocky regions with heavy desertification under different land-use patterns[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 37(6):842-849.
[30]	中华人民共和国农业部, 2006. 土壤检测第1部分:土壤样品的采集、处理和贮存: NY/T 1121.1—2006[S].
	Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China,2006. Soil Testing Part 1: Soil sampling, processing and reposition: NY/T 1121.1—2006[S].

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	10	0	0	83

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	87	6
比例	94%	6%

摘要

129

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	129

	来源	本网站

	次数	129
	比例	100%

养分指标	一级	二级	三级	四级	五级	六级
有机质质量分数/(g∙kg⁻¹)	>40	30—40	20—30	10—20	6—10	<6.0
碱解氮质量分数/(mg∙kg⁻¹)	>150	120—150	90—120	60-90	30—60	<30
有效磷质量分数/(mg∙kg⁻¹)	>40	20—40	10—20	5—10	3—5	<3
速效钾质量分数/(mg∙kg⁻¹)	>200	150— 200	100—150	50—100	30— 50	<30
交换性钙容量/(cmol∙kg⁻¹)	≥4	2—4	≤2
交换性镁容量/(cmol∙kg⁻¹)	≥1	0.5—1	≤0.5
有效硼质量分数/(mg∙kg⁻¹)	>2.0	1.01— 2.0	0.501—1.0	0.201—0.50	<0.20
有效硅质量分数/(mg∙kg⁻¹)	>230	115—230	70—115	25—70	<25

养分指标	一级	二级	三级	四级	五级	六级
有机质质量分数/(g∙kg⁻¹)	>40	30—40	20—30	10—20	6—10	<6.0
碱解氮质量分数/(mg∙kg⁻¹)	>150	120—150	90—120	60-90	30—60	<30
有效磷质量分数/(mg∙kg⁻¹)	>40	20—40	10—20	5—10	3—5	<3
速效钾质量分数/(mg∙kg⁻¹)	>200	150— 200	100—150	50—100	30— 50	<30
交换性钙容量/(cmol∙kg⁻¹)	≥4	2—4	≤2
交换性镁容量/(cmol∙kg⁻¹)	≥1	0.5—1	≤0.5
有效硼质量分数/(mg∙kg⁻¹)	>2.0	1.01— 2.0	0.501—1.0	0.201—0.50	<0.20
有效硅质量分数/(mg∙kg⁻¹)	>230	115—230	70—115	25—70	<25

耕地利用类型	pH				有机质质量分数
耕地利用类型	范围	均值	中位值	变异系数/%	范围/(g∙kg⁻¹)	均值/(g∙kg⁻¹)	中位值/(g∙kg⁻¹)	变异系数/%
水稻田	3.70—6.96	5.48	5.44	10.7	11.2—70.7	30.5	29.6	36.4
叶菜地	4.50—7.07	5.82	5.70	11.0	13.4—42.2	24.4	23.3	32.6
根茎蔬菜地	2.88—7.54	5.77	5.70	17.0	4.92—48.9	22.3	23.7	45.9
茄果与瓜类蔬菜地	4.03—6.89	5.41	5.35	13.4	6.05—83.9	25.9	25.1	44.7
豆类蔬菜地	4.04—6.89	5.69	5.69	11.2	9.84—45.0	24.4	25.2	41.9
玉米地	4.72—7.08	5.62	5.60	11.9	13.2—41.0	27.3	26.9	25.3
花生地	4.16—8.25	6.13	6.33	16.2	8.98—31.2	18.3	16.5	36.0
果园	4.02—7.10	5.46	5.54	15.9	9.44—60.0	30.6	26.3	39.4

耕地利用类型	pH				有机质质量分数
耕地利用类型	范围	均值	中位值	变异系数/%	范围/(g∙kg⁻¹)	均值/(g∙kg⁻¹)	中位值/(g∙kg⁻¹)	变异系数/%
水稻田	3.70—6.96	5.48	5.44	10.7	11.2—70.7	30.5	29.6	36.4
叶菜地	4.50—7.07	5.82	5.70	11.0	13.4—42.2	24.4	23.3	32.6
根茎蔬菜地	2.88—7.54	5.77	5.70	17.0	4.92—48.9	22.3	23.7	45.9
茄果与瓜类蔬菜地	4.03—6.89	5.41	5.35	13.4	6.05—83.9	25.9	25.1	44.7
豆类蔬菜地	4.04—6.89	5.69	5.69	11.2	9.84—45.0	24.4	25.2	41.9
玉米地	4.72—7.08	5.62	5.60	11.9	13.2—41.0	27.3	26.9	25.3
花生地	4.16—8.25	6.13	6.33	16.2	8.98—31.2	18.3	16.5	36.0
果园	4.02—7.10	5.46	5.54	15.9	9.44—60.0	30.6	26.3	39.4

耕地利用类型	碱解氮质量分数				有效磷质量分数				速效钾质量分数
耕地利用类型	范围/ (mg∙kg⁻¹)	均值/ (mg∙kg⁻¹)	中位值/ (mg∙kg⁻¹)	变异系数/ %	范围/ (mg∙kg⁻¹)	均值/ (mg∙kg⁻¹)	中位值/ (mg∙kg⁻¹)	变异系数/ %	范围/ (mg∙kg⁻¹)	均值/ (mg∙kg⁻¹)	中位值/ (mg∙kg⁻¹)	变异系数/ %
水稻田	14.0—275	123	119	45.3	4.68—206	57.5	46.5	78.9	12.0—303	84.4	75.0	64.1
叶菜地	44.9—190	130	129	33.6	21.8—478	174	98.3	86.6	38.0—410	163	153	56.8
根茎蔬菜地	29.6—226	89.7	77.9	52.6	3.93—306	103	72.9	87.6	6.00—313	68.2	53.0	82.3
茄果-瓜类蔬菜地	15.1—302	137	115	49.0	4.89—740	182	144	76.0	17.0—709	163	130	84.9
豆类蔬菜地	32.6—347	98.5	87.9	68.8	6.09—419	147	115	79.3	28.0—337	117	93.0	79.9
玉米地	53.5—218	127	120	34.9	14.8—390	162	117	69.9	29.0—653	209	153	85.6
花生地	3.10—193	85.5	83.9	48.7	2.35—292	83.5	56.6	93.9	27.0—292	71.9	56.0	82.0
果园	38.0—435	144	130	58.0	8.02—694	159	116	87.2	54.0—1.11×10³	294	181	85.8

广东省江门市耕地土壤矿质养分特征及差异

Characteristics and Differences of Soil Mineral Nutrients in Jiangmen City, Guangdong Province

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

本文评价

耕地利用类型	交换性钙质量摩尔浓度				交换性镁质量摩尔浓度				有效硼质量分数				有效硅质量分数
	b/(cmol∙kg⁻¹)			变异系数/ %	b/(cmol∙kg⁻¹)			变异系数/ %	w/(mg∙kg⁻¹)			变异系数/ %	w/(mg∙kg⁻¹)			变异系数/ %
	范围	均值	中位值	变异系数/ %	范围	均值	中位值	变异系数/ %	范围	均值	中位值	变异系数/ %	范围	均值	中位值	变异系数/ %
水稻田	9.00×10⁻²—7.35	1.47	1.20	75.6	0.100—2.00	0.570	0.410	77.0	8.00×10⁻²—1.68	0.640	0.620	50.5	27.2—252	110	92.9	51.7
叶菜地	0.360— 7.00	2.78	2.45	61.8	0.200—2.20	0.940	0.800	62.2	0.180— 1.18	0.700	0.760	37.6	60.2—427	143	110	65.8
根茎蔬菜地	N.d— 8.20	1.91	1.20	94.6	0.100—2.50	0.380	0.300	108	0.148—3.33	0.690	0.620	75.1	25.8—549	145	101	76.4
茄果与瓜类蔬菜地	N.d— 6.23	1.54	1.10	81.0	N.d— 2.34	0.590	0.500	78.9	0.151— 1.86	0.610	0.520	55.1	28.1—693	104	85.8	89.0
豆类蔬菜地	0.340— 7.30	1.96	1.50	90.1	0.200—4.70	0.710	0.370	143	0.220— 1.30	0.640	0.590	45.0	33.8—479	159	127	69.2
玉米地	N.d— 12.7	2.81	1.40	111	0.200—3.00	0.800	0.400	96.0	0.190— 1.08	0.650	0.660	34.5	44.2—430	137	77.5	85.6
花生地	0.107— 9.00	2.81	2.15	82.2	0.100—1.96	0.420	0.300	102	9.00×10⁻²—1.15	0.510	0.480	52.4	25.2—529	172	121	75.2
果园	N.d— 13.0	2.88	1.71	98.9	0.100—4.70	1.14	0.930	83.3	8.30×10⁻²—1.82	0.750	0.730	46.2	41.4—768	156	137	77.6

[1]	许铭宇, 俞龙生. 农林废弃有机材料对离子型稀土矿尾砂的土壤改良效应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(1): 126-134.
[2]	卢德浩, 郑峰霖, 古佳玮, 帅晓迈, 杨佳曼, 李程, 蔡梦真, 陈红跃. 不同林分类型凋落物和土壤水源涵养能力分析与评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(1): 26-35.
[3]	侯金龙, 马志强, 杨澄, 葛双双, 何迪, 董璠. 京津冀地区植被碳源/汇的时空变化特征及影响因素分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(9): 1329-1338.
[4]	李建付, 黄志霖, 和成忠, 姜昕, 宋琳, 刘佳鑫, 陈利顶. 滇东喀斯特断陷盆地土壤有机碳空间分布特征及其关键影响因子[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(9): 1339-1352.
[5]	李彦林, 陈杨洋, 杨霜溶, 刘菊梅. 植物根系分泌的有机酸对土壤碳氮矿化的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(9): 1362-1371.
[6]	石含之, 熊振乾, 曹怡然, 吴志超, 文典, 李富荣, 李冬琴, 王旭. 外源秸秆添加对红壤及黑土有机碳固定的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(9): 1372-1383.
[7]	朱乐洋, 张西哲, 陶江, 王秀, 韩艳英, 叶彦辉. 氮添加对色季拉山急尖长苞冷杉林土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(9): 1384-1396.
[8]	吴东阳, 吴家欢, 李伟志, 黄志杰, 杨春亚, 陈火君. 蚓粪、猪粪配施化肥对土壤质量、辣椒生长及品质的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(9): 1416-1425.
[9]	丛鑫, 张怀迪, 张荣, 赵琛, 陈坤, 刘寒冰. 基于Meta分析的近10年中国农田土壤重金属污染特征与风险解析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(9): 1451-1459.
[10]	刘东宜, 屈永华, 冯耀伟, 屈冉. 基于网格搜索优化CatBoost模型的GF-5卫星影像铬离子含量反演研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(9): 1460-1470.
[11]	庞波, 海香, 张海芳, 张艳军, 王慧, 刘红梅, 杨殿林. 藜芦扩散对山地草甸草地植被特征和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(8): 1174-1181.
[12]	王文静, 翟水晶, 王赛. 闽江下游湿地土壤硅的沿程分布特征及影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(8): 1182-1191.
[13]	范贝贝, 丁帅, 张田田, 张帅, 魏露露, 陈清. 周期性淹水-落干和施用秸秆对白云石改良棕壤磷素流失风险的模拟研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(8): 1203-1213.
[14]	张京磊, 王国良, 吴波, 贾春林, 张进红, 周圆, 马冰. 滨海盐碱地苜蓿-小黑麦轮作对土壤细菌和真菌群落多样性与网络结构的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(7): 1048-1062.
[15]	林于蓝, 陈厚朴, 于文豪, 王宝英, 张杨, 张金波, 蔡祖聪, 赵军. 强还原处理对土壤中常见抗生素及其抗性基因的影响研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(7): 1107-1116.