生态环境学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1176-1186.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.08.002
齐儒春1(
), 王静2,3,*(
), 马林熠1, 马飞2,3, 刘吉利2,3
收稿日期:2025-12-08
修回日期:2026-04-10
接受日期:2026-07-29
出版日期:2026-08-18
发布日期:2026-08-17
通讯作者:
E-mail: 作者简介:齐儒春(2001年生),女(满族),硕士研究生,主要研究方向为农业资源与环境。E-mail: 2670045821@qq.com
基金资助:
Qi Ruchun1(
), Wang Jing2,3,*(
), Ma Linyi1, Ma Fei2,3, Liu Jili2,3
Received:2025-12-08
Revised:2026-04-10
Accepted:2026-07-29
Online:2026-08-18
Published:2026-08-17
摘要:
【目的】旨在探明苏打盐碱土壤在不同种稻年限的影响下土壤有机碳组分含量及其在不同土层的分布规律,揭示其改良效果和内在机理。【方法】以引黄灌区苏打盐碱土为研究对象,通过采集不同种稻年限(1、2、5、8、20年)的土壤样品,分析土壤有机碳、无机碳和总碳含量随着土层深度及种稻年限的变化。【结果】随着种稻年限的增加,土壤有机碳含量在各土层中均有不同程度积累,且在表层(0-20 cm)含量较高,提升了土壤有机质含量;种稻20年时,0-20、20-40、40-60 cm土层土壤无机碳含量在各对应土层中均最高,分别为1.26、1.32、1.79 g·kg−1;土壤总碳含量随长期种植显著增加,且深层(40-60 cm)土壤的总碳含量在种植中期达到峰值后趋于稳定。Pearson相关性分析发现土壤有机碳和土壤总碳存在显著正相关(p<0.05),与土壤无机碳存在负相关。通过冗余分析和Mantel检验得出,土壤速效钾、EC和pH是驱动碳组分变化的关键环境因子,土层深度是影响土壤有机碳和土壤无机碳的关键因子,二者受环境因子影响程度更强(r>0.5)。【结论】长期种植水稻能显著促进苏打盐碱土有机碳库的固存,且这种固碳效应具有明显的表层聚集性和土层差异性,为评估盐碱地稻田生态系统的土壤肥力提供了科学依据。
中图分类号:
齐儒春, 王静, 马林熠, 马飞, 刘吉利. 引黄灌区不同种稻年限苏打盐碱土碳组分垂直分布特征及其驱动因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(8): 1176-1186.
Qi Ruchun, Wang Jing, Ma Linyi, Ma Fei, Liu Jili. Vertical Distribution of Carbon Components in Soda-Saline-Alkaline Soils under Different Rice Cultivation Durations in Yellow River Irrigation Districts and Their Driving Factors[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(8): 1176-1186.
| 种植年限/a | 纬度(N) | 经度(E) | 海拔/m |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38°50′24.18″ | 106°20′29.36″ | 1090 |
| 2 | 38°50′12.83″ | 106°20′28.86″ | 1090 |
| 5 | 38°50′10.46″ | 106°20′28.70″ | 1090 |
| 8 | 38°50′19.35″ | 106°20′30.36″ | 1090 |
| 20 | 38°50′18.25″ | 106°20′28.65″ | 1090 |
表1 试验地信息
Table 1 Test site information
| 种植年限/a | 纬度(N) | 经度(E) | 海拔/m |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38°50′24.18″ | 106°20′29.36″ | 1090 |
| 2 | 38°50′12.83″ | 106°20′28.86″ | 1090 |
| 5 | 38°50′10.46″ | 106°20′28.70″ | 1090 |
| 8 | 38°50′19.35″ | 106°20′30.36″ | 1090 |
| 20 | 38°50′18.25″ | 106°20′28.65″ | 1090 |
| 种植年限/ a | pH | 电导率/ (dS·m−1) | 有机质质量分数/ (g·kg−1) | 速效钾质量分数/ (mg·kg−1) | 速效磷质量分数/ (mg·kg−1) | 碱解氮质量分数/ (mg·kg−1) | 容重/ (g·cm−3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.62±0.03 | 1.26±0.02 | 4.03±0.18 | 163.52±6.30 | 5.33±0.98 | 19.02±1.39 | 1.42±0.03 |
| 2 | 8.77±0.15 | 0.55±0.08 | 4.85±0.03 | 156.78±3.65 | 2.25±0.42 | 15.97±1.68 | 1.57±0.01 |
| 5 | 8.02±0.06 | 0.49±0.01 | 5.23±0.08 | 169.35±8.50 | 3.29±0.23 | 17.23±0.65 | 1.56±0.03 |
| 8 | 8.72±0.03 | 0.23±0.07 | 7.26±0.12 | 173.21±4.39 | 4.19±0.25 | 22.35±3.26 | 1.52±0.02 |
| 20 | 7.11±0.13 | 0.09±0.03 | 7.66±0.06 | 198.36±6.52 | 2.64±0.39 | 28.92±1.25 | 1.59±0.01 |
表2 试验区土壤基本理化性质
Table 2 The physical and chemical properties of experimental site
| 种植年限/ a | pH | 电导率/ (dS·m−1) | 有机质质量分数/ (g·kg−1) | 速效钾质量分数/ (mg·kg−1) | 速效磷质量分数/ (mg·kg−1) | 碱解氮质量分数/ (mg·kg−1) | 容重/ (g·cm−3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.62±0.03 | 1.26±0.02 | 4.03±0.18 | 163.52±6.30 | 5.33±0.98 | 19.02±1.39 | 1.42±0.03 |
| 2 | 8.77±0.15 | 0.55±0.08 | 4.85±0.03 | 156.78±3.65 | 2.25±0.42 | 15.97±1.68 | 1.57±0.01 |
| 5 | 8.02±0.06 | 0.49±0.01 | 5.23±0.08 | 169.35±8.50 | 3.29±0.23 | 17.23±0.65 | 1.56±0.03 |
| 8 | 8.72±0.03 | 0.23±0.07 | 7.26±0.12 | 173.21±4.39 | 4.19±0.25 | 22.35±3.26 | 1.52±0.02 |
| 20 | 7.11±0.13 | 0.09±0.03 | 7.66±0.06 | 198.36±6.52 | 2.64±0.39 | 28.92±1.25 | 1.59±0.01 |
| 年限/ a | 土层深度/ cm | pH | 电导率/ (dS·m−1) | 水分质量分数/ % | 有机质质量 分数/(g·kg−1) | 全氮质量 分数/(g·kg−1) | 全磷质量 分数/(g·kg−1) | 碱解氮质量 分数/(mg·kg−1) | 速效磷质量 分数/(mg·kg−1) | 速效钾质量 分数/(mg·kg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0-20 | 7.97±0.07d | 1.22±0.11a | 14.91±0.18de | 4.56±0.06ef | 0.43±0.01f | 0.55±0.01c | 19.67±0.46e | 6.08±1.12a | 152.96±6.27cd |
| 20-40 | 8.11±0.03cd | 1.11±0.09b | 15.1±0.58de | 4.51±0.03fg | 0.44±0.02ef | 0.56±0.02c | 19.20±1.23e | 5.30±0.46ab | 136.69±3.14e | |
| 40-60 | 8.17±0.08cd | 1.03±0.12b | 15.27±0.12d | 4.44±0.01g | 0.44±0.02ef | 0.55±0.03c | 18.75±0.73e | 4.58±0.73bc | 121.42±2.56f | |
| 2 | 0-20 | 8.33±0.24bc | 0.61±0.02c | 23.41±0.25a | 4.62±0.05e | 0.47±0.01de | 0.57±0.02bc | 16.77±3.47ef | 2.37±0.27fg | 134.82±3.47e |
| 20-40 | 8.59±0.1ab | 0.49±0.04de | 23.50±0.08a | 4.63±0.08e | 0.48±0.01d | 0.57±0.01bc | 15.08±1.7fgh | 2.11±0.21fg | 112.62±5.69g | |
| 40-60 | 8.83±0.11a | 0.39±0.04e | 23.65±0.38a | 4.62±0.03e | 0.47±0.03de | 0.58±0.02bc | 13.37±1.32gh | 1.83±0.06g | 94.42±1.18h | |
| 5 | 0-20 | 7.92±0.21d | 0.50±0.01d | 14.00±0.21f | 5.15±0.02d | 0.55±0.04c | 0.57±0.01bc | 19.01±1.45e | 3.80±0.75cd | 179.05±1.16ab |
| 20-40 | 8.00±0.18d | 0.47±0.07de | 14.60±0.25e | 5.16±0.03d | 0.54±0.02c | 0.57±0.03bc | 15.54±1.17fg | 3.07±0.26def | 175.84±1.62b | |
| 40-60 | 8.09±0.09cd | 0.46±0.09de | 15.16±0.54de | 5.15±0.04d | 0.56±0.03c | 0.57±0.03bc | 12.09±1.61h | 2.34±0.31fg | 171.63±3.33b | |
| 8 | 0-20 | 8.59±0.25ab | 0.23±0.02f | 14.60±0.17e | 7.89±0.05a | 0.68±0.00b | 0.65±0.04a | 25.93±1.03cd | 4.49±0.94bc | 158.74±1.92c |
| 20-40 | 8.68±0.06a | 0.21±0.02f | 17.07±0.13c | 7.82±0.08ab | 0.67±0.01b | 0.66±0.02a | 24.78±1.62d | 3.38±0.47de | 150.34±5.84d | |
| 40-60 | 8.79±0.13a | 0.20±0.02f | 19.57±0.21b | 7.77±0.06bc | 0.68±0.02b | 0.65±0.01a | 23.61±1.16d | 2.25±0.26fg | 141.90±7.06e | |
| 20 | 0-20 | 6.77±0.17e | 0.09±0.01g | 2.57±0.34i | 7.89±0.02a | 0.78±0.03a | 0.59±0.01bc | 31.38±3.33a | 2.78±0.11efg | 186.40±8.31a |
| 20-40 | 6.87±0.05e | 0.07±0.02g | 3.38±0.53h | 7.80±0.03b | 0.79±0.01a | 0.61±0.02b | 30.76±0.58ab | 1.84±0.23g | 179.34±6.48ab | |
| 40-60 | 6.99±0.20e | 0.06±0.01g | 4.17±0.20g | 7.72±0.00c | 0.77±0.02a | 0.59±0.03bc | 28.14±2.32bc | 0.92±0.10h | 171.28±4.25b |
表3 种植年限与土层深度交互作用下土壤理化性质特征
Table 3 Soil physicochemical properties under the interaction of planting duration and soil depth
| 年限/ a | 土层深度/ cm | pH | 电导率/ (dS·m−1) | 水分质量分数/ % | 有机质质量 分数/(g·kg−1) | 全氮质量 分数/(g·kg−1) | 全磷质量 分数/(g·kg−1) | 碱解氮质量 分数/(mg·kg−1) | 速效磷质量 分数/(mg·kg−1) | 速效钾质量 分数/(mg·kg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0-20 | 7.97±0.07d | 1.22±0.11a | 14.91±0.18de | 4.56±0.06ef | 0.43±0.01f | 0.55±0.01c | 19.67±0.46e | 6.08±1.12a | 152.96±6.27cd |
| 20-40 | 8.11±0.03cd | 1.11±0.09b | 15.1±0.58de | 4.51±0.03fg | 0.44±0.02ef | 0.56±0.02c | 19.20±1.23e | 5.30±0.46ab | 136.69±3.14e | |
| 40-60 | 8.17±0.08cd | 1.03±0.12b | 15.27±0.12d | 4.44±0.01g | 0.44±0.02ef | 0.55±0.03c | 18.75±0.73e | 4.58±0.73bc | 121.42±2.56f | |
| 2 | 0-20 | 8.33±0.24bc | 0.61±0.02c | 23.41±0.25a | 4.62±0.05e | 0.47±0.01de | 0.57±0.02bc | 16.77±3.47ef | 2.37±0.27fg | 134.82±3.47e |
| 20-40 | 8.59±0.1ab | 0.49±0.04de | 23.50±0.08a | 4.63±0.08e | 0.48±0.01d | 0.57±0.01bc | 15.08±1.7fgh | 2.11±0.21fg | 112.62±5.69g | |
| 40-60 | 8.83±0.11a | 0.39±0.04e | 23.65±0.38a | 4.62±0.03e | 0.47±0.03de | 0.58±0.02bc | 13.37±1.32gh | 1.83±0.06g | 94.42±1.18h | |
| 5 | 0-20 | 7.92±0.21d | 0.50±0.01d | 14.00±0.21f | 5.15±0.02d | 0.55±0.04c | 0.57±0.01bc | 19.01±1.45e | 3.80±0.75cd | 179.05±1.16ab |
| 20-40 | 8.00±0.18d | 0.47±0.07de | 14.60±0.25e | 5.16±0.03d | 0.54±0.02c | 0.57±0.03bc | 15.54±1.17fg | 3.07±0.26def | 175.84±1.62b | |
| 40-60 | 8.09±0.09cd | 0.46±0.09de | 15.16±0.54de | 5.15±0.04d | 0.56±0.03c | 0.57±0.03bc | 12.09±1.61h | 2.34±0.31fg | 171.63±3.33b | |
| 8 | 0-20 | 8.59±0.25ab | 0.23±0.02f | 14.60±0.17e | 7.89±0.05a | 0.68±0.00b | 0.65±0.04a | 25.93±1.03cd | 4.49±0.94bc | 158.74±1.92c |
| 20-40 | 8.68±0.06a | 0.21±0.02f | 17.07±0.13c | 7.82±0.08ab | 0.67±0.01b | 0.66±0.02a | 24.78±1.62d | 3.38±0.47de | 150.34±5.84d | |
| 40-60 | 8.79±0.13a | 0.20±0.02f | 19.57±0.21b | 7.77±0.06bc | 0.68±0.02b | 0.65±0.01a | 23.61±1.16d | 2.25±0.26fg | 141.90±7.06e | |
| 20 | 0-20 | 6.77±0.17e | 0.09±0.01g | 2.57±0.34i | 7.89±0.02a | 0.78±0.03a | 0.59±0.01bc | 31.38±3.33a | 2.78±0.11efg | 186.40±8.31a |
| 20-40 | 6.87±0.05e | 0.07±0.02g | 3.38±0.53h | 7.80±0.03b | 0.79±0.01a | 0.61±0.02b | 30.76±0.58ab | 1.84±0.23g | 179.34±6.48ab | |
| 40-60 | 6.99±0.20e | 0.06±0.01g | 4.17±0.20g | 7.72±0.00c | 0.77±0.02a | 0.59±0.03bc | 28.14±2.32bc | 0.92±0.10h | 171.28±4.25b |
| 因子 | F值 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 土壤有机碳 | 土壤无机碳 | 土壤总碳 | |
| 种植年限 | 704.73* | 100.87* | 157.52* |
| 土层深度 | 11958.45* | 126.00* | 255.32* |
| 种植年限×土层深度 | 391.08* | 32.92* | 53.10* |
表4 种植年限和土层深度对土壤碳组分影响的双因素方差分析
Table 4 Two-factor ANOVA of the effects of planting duration and soil layer depth on soil carbon components
| 因子 | F值 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 土壤有机碳 | 土壤无机碳 | 土壤总碳 | |
| 种植年限 | 704.73* | 100.87* | 157.52* |
| 土层深度 | 11958.45* | 126.00* | 255.32* |
| 种植年限×土层深度 | 391.08* | 32.92* | 53.10* |
图2 不同种植年限水稻的不同土层有机碳含量 图中大写字母表示同一种植年限不同土层间差异显著(p<0.05),小写字母表示不同种植年限同一土层间差异显著(p<0.05)。下同
Figure 2 Soil organic carbon content in different rice cropping systems by planting duration
图5 土壤碳组分与各因子间的相关性分析 *表示在0.05的水平下显著相关,**表示在0.01的水平下极显著相关,***表示在0.001的水平下极其显著相关;NX为种植年限,SD为土层深度,SOC为有机碳,SIC为无机碳,TC为总碳,MC为含水量,SOM为有机质,TN为全氮,TP为全磷,AN为碱解氮,AP为速效磷,AK为速效钾
Figure 5 Correlation analysis between soil carbon components and various factors
图7 土壤碳组分影响因子的Mantel分析 NX为种植年限,SD为土层深度,MC为含水量,SOM为有机质,TN为全氮,TP为全磷,AN为碱解氮,AP为速效磷,AK为速效钾,SOC为有机碳,SIC为无机碳,TC为总碳
Figure 7 Mantel analysis of factors influencing soil carbon components
| [1] |
Bughio M A, Wang P L, Meng F Q, et al., 2016. Neoformation of pedogenic carbonates by irrigation and fertilization and their contribution to carbon sequestration in soil[J]. Geoderma, 262: 12-19.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
Kirk G J D, Boghi A, Affholder M C, et al., 2019. Soil carbon dioxide venting through rice roots[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 42(12): 3197-3207.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
Li B B, Li P P, Yang X M, et al., 2021. Land‐use conversion changes deep soil organic carbon stock in the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 32(1): 505-517.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
Li X H, Ding J L, Liu J, et al., 2021. Digital mapping of soil organic carbon using sentinel series data: A case study of the Ebinur lake watershed in Xinjiang[J]. Remote Sensing, 13: 769.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
Meetei T T, Kundu M C, Devi Y B, 2020. Long-term effect of rice-based cropping systems on pools of soil organic carbon in farmer’s field in hilly agroecosystem of Manipur, India[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(4): 1-17.
DOI |
| [6] |
Raza S, Irshad A, Margenot A, et al., 2024. Inorganic carbon is overlooked in global soilcarbon research: A bibliometric analysis[J]. Geoderma, 443: 116831.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
Yang X M, Song Z L, Zwieten L V, et al., 2024. Significant accrual of soil organic carbon through long‐term rice cultivation in paddy fields in China[J]. Global Change BIology, 30(3): e17213.
DOI URL |
| [8] | 陈超, 李劲彬, 2017. 城市绿化用地土壤有机碳和无机碳剖面分布特征[J]. 农业科学研究, 38(4): 7-12. |
| Chen C, Li J B, 2017. Profile distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon and inorganic carbon in urban green space[J]. Agricultural Science Research, 38(4): 7-12. | |
| [9] | 陈建国, 张杨珠, 曾希柏, 等, 2008. 不同配方施肥对长期缺施钾肥的红壤性水稻土微生物特性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 14(6): 1200-1205. |
| Chen J G, Zhang Y Z, Zeng X B, et al., 2008. Effects of different fertilizer formulations on microbial properties of red-soil paddy soils long-term deficient in potassium fertilizer[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 14(6): 1200-1205. | |
| [10] | 白曙光, 焦燕, 温慧洋, 等, 2018. 不同含盐量土壤可溶性无机碳及盐基离子的剖面分布特征[J]. 地球环境学报, 9(4): 348-355. |
| Bai S G, Jiao Y, Wen H Y, et al., 2018. Profile distribution characteristics of soluble inorganic carbon and base ions in soils with different salinity levels[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Sciences, 9(4): 348-355. | |
| [11] | 崔宇鸿, 叶绍明, 卢志锋, 等, 2024. 不同连栽代次桉树人工林土壤团聚体中有机碳组分的积累和转化[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 46(10): 42-52. |
| Cui Y H, Ye S M, Lu Z F, et al., 2024. Accumulation and transformation of organic carbon components in soil aggregates of eucalyptus plantations with different successive planting generations[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 46(10): 42-52. | |
| [12] | 范东亮, 周蓓蓓, 陈晓鹏, 等, 2025. 枯草芽孢杆菌调控轻度盐碱土微环境与棉花增产机制[J]. 农业工程学报, 41(2): 134-145. |
| Fan D L, Zhou B B, Chen X P, et al., 2025. Mechanism of bacillus subtilis regulation of microenvironment in mildly saline-alkali soil and its role in cotton yield enhancement[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Engineering, 41(2): 134-145. | |
| [13] | 郭军玲, 金辉, 郭彩霞, 等, 2019. 不同有机物料对苏打盐化土有机碳和活性碳组分的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 25(8): 1290-1299. |
| Guo J L, Jin H, Guo C X, et al., 2019. Effects of different organic materials on organic carbon and active carbon components in soda-salt-affected soils[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 25(8): 1290-1299. | |
| [14] | 胡丹阳, 张欢, 宿宝巍, 等, 2024. 长江下游沿江平原土壤发育过程中碳库分配动态[J]. 环境科学, 45(1): 314-322. |
| Hu D Y, Zhang H, Su B W, et al., 2024. Dynamics of carbon pool allocation during soil development in the Yangtze River Delta Plain[J]. Environmental Science, 45(1): 314-322. | |
| [15] | 黄子晨, 张小平, 卞方圆, 等, 2020. 浙东滨海围垦区土壤碳含量的时间变化特征及其影响因子[J]. 土壤通报, 51(6): 1409-1415. |
| Huang Z C, Zhang X P, Bian F Y, et al., 2020. Temporal variation characteristics of soil carbon content and influencing factors in coastal reclamation areas of eastern Zhejiang[J]. Bulletin of Soil Science, 51(6): 1409-1415. | |
| [16] |
康民泰, 杜孝敬, 张燕红, 等, 2024. 新疆盐渍区水稻品种生育表现与耐盐性筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 61(3): 591-598.
DOI |
| Kang M T, Du X J, Zhang Y H, et al., 2024. Growth performance and salt tolerance screening of rice varieties in saline-alkali areas of Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 61(3): 591-598. | |
| [17] | 孔晨晨, 2025. 北京市农田土壤有机碳分布特征及驱动机制研究[D]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学. |
| Kong C C, 2025. Distribution characteristics and driving mechanisms of soil organic carbon in farmland soils of Beijing[D]. Huainan: Anhui University of Science and Technology. | |
| [18] | 李森淼, 2025. 长期施用有机肥对苏打盐碱土有机碳组分及胡敏酸结构特征的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学. |
| Li S M, 2025. Effects of Long-Term Application of Organic Fertilizer on Organic Carbon Components and humic acid structural characteristics in sodic-alkali soils[D]. Harbin:Northeast Agricultural University. | |
| [19] | 刘骅欣, 2024. 吉林西部盐碱区土壤有机碳时空变化及影响因素研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学. |
| Liu H X, 2024. Spatiotemporal variations and influencing factors of soil organic carbon in western Jilin’s saline-alkali areas[D]. Changchun: Jilin University. | |
| [20] | 刘琪, 李宇虹, 李哲, 等, 2021. 不同水分条件和微生物生物量水平下水稻土有机碳矿化及其影响因子特征[J]. 环境科学, 42(5): 2440-2448. |
| Liu Q, Li Y H, Li Z, et al., 2021. Organic carbon mineralization in paddy soils under different moisture conditions and microbial biomass levels and its influencing factors[J]. Environmental Science, 42(5): 2440-2448. | |
| [21] | 陆水凤, 王呈玉, 杜燕, 等, 2019. 种稻年限对苏打盐碱土理化性质及真菌群落的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 40(1): 15-22. |
| Lu S F, Wang C Y, Du Y, et al., 2019. Effects of rice cultivation duration on the physicochemical properties and fungal communities of soda-alkali soils[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 40(1): 15-22. | |
| [22] | 雒琼, 王玉刚, 邓彩云, 等, 2017. 不同农业土地利用年限干旱区土壤剖面碳存储动态变化[J]. 农业工程学报, 33(19): 287-294. |
| Luo Q, Wang Y G, Deng C Y, et al., 2017. Dynamic changes in soil profile carbon storage under different agricultural land use durations in arid regions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Engineering, 33(19): 287-294. | |
| [23] | 罗雪娇, 王志春, 杨帆, 2024. 苏打盐碱土壤黏粒分散特征研究进展[J]. 土壤, 56(2): 255-263. |
| Luo X J, Wang Z C, Yang F, 2024. Research progress on the dispersion characteristics of clay particles in soda-alkali soils[J]. Soil, 56(2): 255-263. | |
| [24] | 孟慧婷, 陈龙池, 余鑫, 等, 2026. 土地利用变化对东江湖流域森林土壤有机碳含量的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 45(1): 77-83. |
| Meng H T, Chen L C, Yu X, et al., 2026. Impact of land use change on forest soil organic carbon content in the dongjiang lake basin[J]. Journal of Ecology, 45(1): 77-83. | |
| [25] | 宋佳珅, 张宏媛, 常芳弟, 等, 2023. 亚表层培肥结合地膜覆盖对河套灌区盐碱土壤有机碳和无机碳的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 31(3): 385-395. |
| Song J S, Zhang H Y, Chang F D, et al., 2023. Effects of subsurface fertilization combined with plastic mulching on organic and inorganic carbon in saline-alkali soils of the Hetao irrigation district[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecological Agriculture (Chinese and English), 31(3): 385-395. | |
| [26] | 汤洁, 刘禹晴, 王思宁, 等, 2019. 吉林西部盐碱地区稻田土壤有机碳矿化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 33(2): 162-168. |
| Tang J, Liu Y Q, Wang S N, et al., 2019. Mineralization characteristics of soil organic carbon in rice fields of western Jilin’s saline-alkali region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 33(2): 162-168. | |
| [27] | 王静, 程昱润, 肖国举, 等, 2021. 宁夏银北不同草田轮作模式对细菌群落组成特征的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 52(7): 283-292. |
| Wang J, Cheng Y R, Xiao G J, et al., 2021. Effects of different grass-crop rotation patterns on bacterial community composition characteristics in Yinchuan north, Ningxia[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 52(7): 283-292. | |
| [28] | 王萍, 2014. 稻田土壤有机碳积累、稳定及其生态功能变化: 滩涂围垦稻田植稻时间序列案例研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学. |
| Wang P, 2014. Accumulation, stability and ecological function changes of soil organic carbon in paddy fields: A case study of rice planting time series in reclaimed tidal flat paddy fields[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University. | |
| [29] | 解雪峰, 刘艳英, 阮妤楠, 等, 2025. 天目山森林土壤碳组分沿海拔梯度变化特征及影响因素[J]. 环境科学, 46(11): 7006-7012. |
| Xie X F, Liu Y Y, Ruan Y N, et al., 2025. Altitudinal gradient variations and influencing factors of carbon components in forest soils of Tianmushan mountain[J]. Environmental Science, 46(11): 7006-7012. | |
| [30] |
许文强, 陈曦, 罗格平, 等, 2011. 土壤碳循环研究进展及干旱区土壤碳循环研究展望[J]. 干旱区地理, 34(4): 614-620.
DOI |
| Xu W Q, Chen X, Luo G P, et al., 2011. Advances in soil carbon cycle research and prospects for soil Carbon cycle studies in arid regions[J]. Arid Zone Geography, 34(4): 614-620. | |
| [31] | 杨潇, 2025. 渭北旱塬长期施肥下土壤无机碳组分变化的驱动机制[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学. |
| Yang X, 2025. Driving mechanisms of changes in soil inorganic carbon components under long-term fertilization on the Weibei Dry plateau[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University. | |
| [32] | 于艳丽, 2023. 盐碱地土壤改良与水稻栽培技术探讨[J]. 农业科技与装备 (2): 46-47, 50. |
| Yu Y L, 2023. Discussion on soil improvement and rice cultivation techniques for saline-alkali land[J]. Agricultural Science and Technology Equipment (2): 46-47, 50. | |
| [33] | 苑佰飞, 马玉涛, 包岩, 等, 2019. 水稻种植对吉林省西部苏打盐碱土改良培肥效果[J]. 水土保持学报, 33(3): 320-326. |
| Yuan B F, Ma Y T, Bao Y, et al., 2019. Effect of rice cultivation on ameliorating soil fertility of soda saline-alkali soil in western Jilin province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 33(3): 320-326. | |
| [34] | 臧金宇, 刘金华, 刘胜楠, 等, 2024. 不同种稻年限苏打盐碱土剖面性状及有机碳分布特征[J]. 生态科学, 43(3): 169-177. |
| Zang J Y, Liu J H, Liu S N, et al., 2024. Profile characteristics and organic carbon distribution in soda-alkali soils with different rice-cultivation durations[J]. Ecological Science, 43(3): 169-177. | |
| [35] |
张俊华, 李国栋, 王岩松, 等, 2020. 黄河泥沙冲/沉积区土壤有机碳不同组分空间特征及变异机制[J]. 地理学报, 75(3): 558-570.
DOI |
| Zhang J H, Li G D, Wang Y S, et al., 2020. Spatial characteristics and variation mechanisms of different components of soil organic carbon in the erosional/depositional zone of the yellow river[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 75(3): 558-570. | |
| [36] | 张敬业, 张文菊, 徐明岗, 等, 2012. 长期施肥下红壤有机碳及其颗粒组分对不同施肥模式的响应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 18(4): 868-875. |
| Zhang J Y, Zhang W J, Xu M G, et al., 2012. Response of organic carbon and its particle fractions in red soil to different fertilization regimes under long-term fertilization[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 18(4): 868-875. | |
| [37] | 张敬智, 马超, 郜红建, 2017. 淹水和好气条件下东北稻田黑土有机碳矿化和微生物群落演变规律[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 36(6): 1160-1166. |
| Zhang J Z, Ma C, Gao H J, 2017. Patterns of organic carbon mineralization and microbial community evolution in northeast China’s paddy black soil under flooded and aerated conditions[J]. Journal of Agricultural Environmental Sciences, 36(6): 1160-1166. | |
| [38] | 祝慧, 陶静静, 王明达, 等, 2024. 基于文献计量分析土壤无机碳研究现状与趋势[J]. 土壤通报, 55(4): 1174-1184. |
| Zhu H, Tao J J, Wang M D, et al., 2024. Current status and trends in soil inorganic carbon research based on bibliometric analysis[J]. Bulletin of Soil Science, 55(4): 1174-1184. | |
| [39] | 朱阳春, 张振华, 赵学勇, 等, 2017. 河套灌区土壤有机碳和总碳的空间异质性及相关性分析[J]. 江苏农业学报, 33(6): 1294-1300. |
| Zhu Y C, Zhang Z H, Zhao X Y, et al., 2017. Spatial heterogeneity and correlation analysis of soil organic carbon and total carbon in the Hetao irrigation district[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Agriculture, 33(6): 1294-1300. |
| [1] | 王宇星, 王文颖, 熊友才, 杨方堃, 马燕梅. 高寒草地土壤总有机碳与活性碳组分对退化和地形的响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(6): 831-842. |
| [2] | 王丹妮, 曾荣菊, 林诗英, 吴彦, 李雅颖, 俞永祥, 姚槐应. 宁波市陆地生态系统土壤碳储量及固碳潜力评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(6): 856-864. |
| [3] | 李梦, 韩亚峰, 胡艺宝, 姜梦晓, 张鑫, 高佳凯, 马任甜, 郑宾, 张烨, 孙丽蓉, 郭大勇, 石兆勇, 王旭刚. 不同化学结构外源碳添加对稻田土壤有机碳组分及碳排放的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(6): 865-874. |
| [4] | 邱锡香, 罗义豪, 周健闪, 张昆, 张银烽. 滇西北典型高原湿地土壤铁结合态有机碳含量特征及调控因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(5): 714-724. |
| [5] | 唐中奥, 淳祯杰, 段兴武, 张瑞环, 荣丽, 刘文旭. 模拟侵蚀对元江流域黄红壤土壤微生物和土壤有机碳的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(1): 54-61. |
| [6] | 王国琳, 刘凯英, 宋宁宁, 刘君, 王芳丽, 王学霞, 宗海英, 李绍静. 盐碱土有机态氮组分对秸秆及秸秆生物炭输入的响应机理[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(1): 62-74. |
| [7] | 刘卿, 龚雨顺, 王伟, 方贤滔, 吴金水, 沈健林. 湖南典型茶园土壤有机碳及其组分时空特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(9): 1386-1397. |
| [8] | 申佳龙, 吴栎宏, 李林霜, 周远芳, 杨孝民. 典型喀斯特山地小流域土地利用类型对土壤有机碳组分及其固碳效应的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(3): 358-367. |
| [9] | 李建付, 黄志霖, 和成忠, 姜昕, 宋琳, 刘佳鑫, 陈利顶. 滇东喀斯特断陷盆地土壤有机碳空间分布特征及其关键影响因子[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(9): 1339-1352. |
| [10] | 石含之, 熊振乾, 曹怡然, 吴志超, 文典, 李富荣, 李冬琴, 王旭. 外源秸秆添加对红壤及黑土有机碳固定的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(9): 1372-1383. |
| [11] | 罗庆, 何清, 吴慧秋, 寇力月, 方旭, 张鑫雨, 李缘, 柴育廷, 张瑞生, 代文举. 辽河口湿地土壤有机碳组分特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(3): 333-340. |
| [12] | 林丹丹, 毕华兴, 赵丹阳, 管凝, 韩金丹, 郭艳杰. 晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林土壤有机碳组分及碳库特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(3): 379-388. |
| [13] | 常博然, 陈茹岚, 王彪, 蓝天, 邓琳, 薛会英. 藏东南折拉山不同林分类型土壤有机碳及其组分分布特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(10): 1495-1505. |
| [14] | 梁鑫, 韩亚峰, 郑柯, 王旭刚, 陈志怀, 杜鹃. 磁铁矿对稻田土壤碳矿化的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(9): 1615-1622. |
| [15] | 赵维彬, 唐丽, 王松, 刘玲玲, 王树凤, 肖江, 陈光才. 两种生物炭对滨海盐碱土的改良效果[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(4): 678-686. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||