固定化混合菌对陕北黄土地区石油污染土壤的修复效果

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.08.013

生态环境学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 1610-1615.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.08.013

固定化混合菌对陕北黄土地区石油污染土壤的修复效果

花莉^*(), 成涛之, 梁智勇

陕西科技大学环境科学与工程学院,陕西西安 710021

收稿日期:2021-09-16 出版日期:2022-08-18 发布日期:2022-10-10
通讯作者: * 花莉, E-mail: tuliphua@126.com
作者简介:花莉（1979年生）,女,教授,博士,研究方向为固体废弃物资源化及土壤污染修复。E-mail: tuliphua@126.com
基金资助:
陕西省科技厅重点研发项目(S2018-YF-YBSF-0369);陕西省西安市科技计划项目(2019GXYD1.9);陕西省西安市未央区科技计划项目(202043)

Remediation Effect of Petroleum-Contaminated Soil by Immobilized Mixed Bacteria in Northern Shaanxi Province of China

HUA Li^*(), CHENG Taozhi, LIANG Zhiyong

College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710021, P. R. China

Received:2021-09-16 Online:2022-08-18 Published:2022-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近些年土壤污染修复问题备受关注,而在贫瘠的黄土地区,本身脆弱的土壤环境加之受石油污染,给环境造成巨大危害,探寻一种适合用于黄土地区石油污染土壤的修复方法尤为重要。利用前期已筛选的高效石油降解菌,分别以小麦秸秆、生物炭和活性炭为吸附载体,海藻酸钠为包埋剂对混合菌进行吸附包埋固定,研究了不同载体固定化混合菌对陕北黄土地区受石油污染土壤的修复效果及修复后土壤中微生物多样性的变化。研究发现固定化混合菌对原油的降解效果比游离态混合菌好,且不同固定化载体修复效果有差异。经过42 d的修复,灭菌组中秸秆固定化混合菌修复效果最好,降解率为54.92%,比单纯的游离混合菌提高了20%;未灭菌组中生物质炭固定化混合菌修复效果最好,降解率为54.19%,比游离态混合菌提高了近30%。与游离态混合菌相比,固定化混合菌对石油的去除效果显著提高,可以在相对短的时间内达到较高的去除率。土壤Shannon-Wiener指数与微生物多样性T-RFLP的分析表明,石油烃降解率和微生物多样性变化相吻合。石油烃降解率高的土壤,其微生物多样性高,这是由于生物质炭为固定化混合菌提供了最适宜的生长环境,同时它是促进厚壁菌门（Firmicutes）和变形菌门（Proteobacteria）生长的最佳载体,对于修复土壤比秸秆提高养分更重要。由此可见,固定化混合菌在石油生物降解过程中起重要作用。

关键词: 黄土, 石油污染土壤, 固定化微生物, 微生物群落, 微生物多样性

Abstract:

Soil pollution remediation has received much attention in recent years. the fragile soil environment combined with oil pollution has caused great harm to the environment in the barren loess areas. It is important to find a suitable remediation method for oil-contaminated soil in loess areas. Immobilized microorganism beans were prepared with straw, biochar, and activated carbon for adsorption carrier respectively and sodium alginate as embedding agent by using highly efficient oil degradation hybrid bacteria screened in early. The effect of soil restoration with different carrier immobilized mixed bacteria and the microbial diversity in the petroleum-contaminated soil after remediation were investigated in the loess region of northern Shaanxi. The degradation effect of immobilized mixed bacteria on crude oil was better than that of free mixed bacteria. the remediation effects of different immobilized carriers were different. After 42-days remediation, the best remediation effect of straw immobilized hybrid bacteria in the sterilized group was 54.92%, which was 20% higher than that of free hybrid bacteria alone. The best remediation effect of biomass charcoal immobilized hybrid bacteria in the unsterilized group was 54.19%, which was nearly 30% higher than that of free hybrid bacteria. It suggested that the immobilized hybrid bacteria were significantly more effective in removing petroleum than the free state hybrid bacteria, and could achieve relatively high removal rate in a relatively short period of time. Soil Shannon-Wiener index and microbial diversity T-RFLP analyses showed that the degradation rate of petroleum hydrocarbons was correlated with the microbial diversity in soils. This might be attributed to the fact that biomass charcoal provided the most suitable environment for the growth of immobilized mixed bacteria, and was the best vehicle to promote the growth of phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, which is more important than straw to improve the nutrients for soil remediation. This study suggested that the immobilized mixed bacteria played an important role in the petroleum biodegradation process.

Key words: loess, petroleum contaminated soil, immobilized microorganisms, microbial community, microbial diversity

中图分类号:

花莉, 成涛之, 梁智勇. 固定化混合菌对陕北黄土地区石油污染土壤的修复效果[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(8): 1610-1615.

HUA Li, CHENG Taozhi, LIANG Zhiyong. Remediation Effect of Petroleum-Contaminated Soil by Immobilized Mixed Bacteria in Northern Shaanxi Province of China[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(8): 1610-1615.

图/表 4

参考文献 24

[1]	ABENA M T B, LI T, SHAH M N, et al., 2019. Biodegradation of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in highly contaminated soils by natural attenuation and bioaugmentation[J]. Chemosphere, 234: 864-874. DOI PMID
[2]	BLACKWOOD C B, MARSH T, KIM S H, et al., 2003. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism data analysis for quantitative comparison of microbial communities[J]. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 69(2): 926-933.
[3]	MEYER S, BRIGHT R M, FISCHER D, et al., 2012. Albedo impact on the suitability of biochar systems to mitigate global warming[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(22): 12726-12734. DOI URL
[4]	PACWA-PLOCINICZAK M, PLAZA G A, POLIWODA A, et al., 2014. Characterization of hydrocarbon-degrading and biosurfactant-producing Pseudomonas sp. P-1 strain as a potential tool for bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(15): 9385-9395. DOI URL
[5]	SAN M F, KACHT W, VARGAS T, et al., 2020. Mechanisms of pyritebio depression with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans in seawater flotation[J]. Minerals Engineering, DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2019.106067. DOI
[6]	VECINO X, DEVESA-REY R, CRUZ J M, et al., 2013. Entrapped peat in alginate beads as green adsorbent for the elimination of dye compounds from vinasses[J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 224(3): 1-9.
[7]	WU M L, WU J L, ZHANG X H, et al., 2019. Effect of bioaugmentation and bio stimulation on hydrocarbon degradation and microbial community composition in petroleum-contaminated loessal soil[J]. Chemosphere, DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124456. DOI
[8]	WU P, WANG Z Y, BHATNAGAR A, et al., 2021. Microorganisms-carbonaceous materials immobilized complexes: Synthesis, adaptability and environmental applications[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125915. DOI
[9]	XU X, WU Z, DONG Y, et al., 2016. Effects of nitrogen and biochar amendment on soil methane concentration profiles and diffusion in a rice-wheat annual rotation system[J]. Scientific Reports, DOI: 10.1038/srep38688. DOI
[10]	ZHU X M, CHEN B L, ZHU L Z, et al., 2017. Effects and mechanisms of biochar-microbe interactions in soil improvement and pollution remediation: A review[J]. Environmental Pollution, 227: 98-115. DOI PMID
[11]	ZHANG D X, PAN G X, WU G, et al., 2016. Biochar helps enhance maize productivity and reduce greenhouse gas emissions under balanced fertilization in a rainfed low fertility inceptisol[J]. Chemosphere, 142: 106-113. DOI PMID
[12]	卜晓莉, 薛建辉, 2014. 生物炭对土壤生境及植物生长影响的研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 23(3): 535-540.
	BU X L, XUE J H, 2014. Biochar effects on soil habitat and plant growth: A review[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 23(3): 535-540.
[13]	程扬, 刘子丹, 沈启斌, 等, 2018. 秸秆生物炭施用对玉米根际和非根际土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 27(10): 1870-1877.
	CHENG Y, LIU Z D, SHEN Q B, et al., 2018. The impact of straw biochar on corn rhizospheric and non-rhizospheric soil microbial community structure[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 27(10): 1870-1877.
[14]	马健波, 韩斌, 任文涛, 等, 2021. 陕北某采油厂石油污染土壤的修复示范工程[J]. 化工环保, 41(1): 56-60. DOI
	MA J B, HAN B, REN W T, et al., 2021. Effects and biological response on bioremediation of petroleum contaminated soil[J]. Environmental Protection, 41(1): 56-60.
[15]	马骁轩, 蔡红珍, 付鹏, 等, 2016. 中国农业固体废弃物秸秆的资源化处置途径分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 25(1): 168-174.
	MA X X, CAI H Z, FU P, et al., 2016. Analysis of the reutilization methods for agricultural waste of straw in China[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 25(1): 168-174
[16]	屈撑囤, 马健波, 贾汉忠, 等, 2016. 微生物协同降解深层石油污染土壤研究[J]. 油气田环境保护, 26(5): 6-9, 17, 60.
	QU Z T, MA J B, JIA H Z, et al., 2016. Research on microbial synergistic degradation of deep petroleum contaminated soil[J]. Environmental Protection of Oil and Gas Fields, 26(5): 6-9, 17, 60.
[17]	任静, 沈佳敏, 张磊, 等, 2020. 生物炭固定化多环芳烃高效降解菌剂的制备及稳定性[J]. 环境科学学报, 40(2): 4517-4523.
	REN J, SHEN J M, ZHANG L, et al., 2020. Preparation and stability of biochar for the immobilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons degradating-bacteria[J]. Journal of Environmental Science, 40(2): 4517-4523.
[18]	王娣, 马闯, 高欢, 等, 2020. 微生物强化对石油污染土壤的修复特性研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 39(12): 2798-2805.
	WANG T, MA C, GAO H, et al., 2020. Study of survival conditions and growth of petroleum hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria in petroleumcontaminated soil[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 39(12): 2798-2805.
[19]	温传忠, 王绪远, 2011. 超声-重量法测定不同土壤粒级石油回收率研究[J]. 广州化工, 39(2): 70-73.
	WEN C Z, WANG X Y, 2011. Research on the extractive ratio of oil in different diameter soil mensurated by measure of ultrasonic and weight[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 39(2): 70-73.
[20]	许殷瑞, 吴蔓莉, 王丽, 等, 2021. 陕北油田区石油污染土壤微生物种群变化及影响因素[J/OL]. 中国环境科学: 1-14[2021-09-14]. https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.20210313.006.
	XU Y R, WU M L, WANG L, et al., 2021. The in ffluences of petroleum pollution on the microbial population distribution in Northern Shaanxi province of China[J/OL]. China Environmental Science, 1-14 [2021-09-14]. https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.20210313.006.
[21]	杨萌青, 李立明, 李川, 等, 2013. 石油污染土壤微生物群落结构与分布特性研究[J]. 环境科学, 34(2): 789-794.
	YANG M Q, LI L M, LI C, et al., 2013. Microbial community structure and distribution characteristics in oil contaminated soil[J]. Environmental Science, 34(2): 789-794. DOI URL
[22]	杨茜, 吴蔓莉, 聂麦茜, 等, 2015. 石油污染土壤的生物修复技术及微生物生态效应[J]. 环境科学, 36(5): 1856-1863.
	YANG Q, WU M L, NIE M Q, et al., 2015. Effects and biological response on bioremediation of petroleum contaminated soil[J]. Environmental Science, 36(5): 1856-1863. DOI URL
[23]	袁三青, 薛燕芬, 高鹏, 等, 2007. T-RFLP技术分析油藏微生物多样性[J]. 微生物学报, 47(2): 290-294.
	YUAN S Q, XUE Y F, GAO P, et al., 2007. Microbial diversity in Shengli petroleum reservoirs analyzed by T-RFLP.[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 47(2): 290-294.
[24]	张又弛, 李会丹, 2015. 生物炭对土壤中微生物群落结构及其生物地球化学功能的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 24(5): 898-905.
	ZHANG Y C, LI H D, 2015. Influence of biochar on the community structure and biogeochemical functions of microorganisms in soils[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 24(5): 898-905.

序号 Number	样品 Sample	辛普森指数J Simpson (J)	香农指数H Shannon (H)	均匀度 Uniformity	Brillouin 指数Brillouin	D_mc(McIntosh) 指数McIntosh (D_mc)
1	A-1	0.8224	3.1674	0.7456	2.818	0.6319
2	A-2	0.6374	2.1894	0.5751	1.9482	0.4364
3	A-3	0.5098	2.0034	0.4716	1.7185	0.3289
4	B-1	0.5592	1.9484	0.4987	1.7119	0.3686
5	B-2	0.7707	2.8533	0.6717	2.5252	0.5702
6	B-3	0.7337	2.6409	0.6333	2.3354	0.5296

序号 Number	样品 Sample	辛普森指数J Simpson (J)	香农指数H Shannon (H)	均匀度 Uniformity	Brillouin 指数Brillouin	D_mc(McIntosh) 指数McIntosh (D_mc)
1	A-1	0.8224	3.1674	0.7456	2.818	0.6319
2	A-2	0.6374	2.1894	0.5751	1.9482	0.4364
3	A-3	0.5098	2.0034	0.4716	1.7185	0.3289
4	B-1	0.5592	1.9484	0.4987	1.7119	0.3686
5	B-2	0.7707	2.8533	0.6717	2.5252	0.5702
6	B-3	0.7337	2.6409	0.6333	2.3354	0.5296

菌门水平 Phylum	样品 Sample
菌门水平 Phylum	A-1	A-2	A-3	B-1	B-2	B-3
Firmicutes	3.21	2.25	1.32	0.16	0.48	0.23
Proteobacteria	0.52	3.12	0.49	1.38	3.25	2.46
Actinobacteria	6.42	11.15	7.61	11.81	6.60	13.91
Bacteroidetes	2.07	6.07	3.34	5.05	1.95	1.98
Aquificae	0.10	0.00	0.07	0.10	0.56	0.18
Deferribacteres	0.14	0.10	0.12	0.16	0.18	0.19
Fibrobacteress	0.23	0.37	0.37	0.49	0.28	0.33
Thermus	0.06	0.04	0.05	0.06	0.07	0.08
Others	0.50	5.47	0.82	1.57	0.21	0.23
Uncultured	86.75	71.48	85.79	79.28	86.47	80.31

菌门水平 Phylum	样品 Sample
菌门水平 Phylum	A-1	A-2	A-3	B-1	B-2	B-3
Firmicutes	3.21	2.25	1.32	0.16	0.48	0.23
Proteobacteria	0.52	3.12	0.49	1.38	3.25	2.46
Actinobacteria	6.42	11.15	7.61	11.81	6.60	13.91
Bacteroidetes	2.07	6.07	3.34	5.05	1.95	1.98
Aquificae	0.10	0.00	0.07	0.10	0.56	0.18
Deferribacteres	0.14	0.10	0.12	0.16	0.18	0.19
Fibrobacteress	0.23	0.37	0.37	0.49	0.28	0.33
Thermus	0.06	0.04	0.05	0.06	0.07	0.08
Others	0.50	5.47	0.82	1.57	0.21	0.23
Uncultured	86.75	71.48	85.79	79.28	86.47	80.31

固定化混合菌对陕北黄土地区石油污染土壤的修复效果

Remediation Effect of Petroleum-Contaminated Soil by Immobilized Mixed Bacteria in Northern Shaanxi Province of China

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 24

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王琳, 卫伟. 黄土高原典型县域生态系统服务变化特征及驱动因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(6): 1140-1148.
[2]	陈俊芳, 吴宪, 刘啸林, 刘娟, 杨佳绒, 刘宇. 不同土壤水分下元素化学计量对微生物多样性的塑造特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(5): 898-909.
[3]	王云, 郑西来, 曹敏, 李磊, 宋晓冉, 林晓宇, 郭凯. 滨海含水层咸-淡水过渡带反硝化性能与控制因素研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(5): 980-988.
[4]	阳涅, 孙晓旭, 孔天乐, 孙蔚旻, 陈泉源, 高品. 微生物群落对河流底泥中锑含量变化的响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(3): 609-618.
[5]	王洁, 单燕, 马兰, 宋延静, 王向誉. 秸秆/生物质炭协同还田措施对黄河三角洲盐碱土壤的改良效果研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(1): 90-98.
[6]	陈小弯, 田华川, 常军军, 陈礼强, 舒兴权, 冯秀祥. 杞麓湖中河河口表流湿地净化河道污染水的效果及其微生物群落特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(9): 1865-1875.
[7]	齐月, 张强, 胡淑娟, 蔡迪花, 赵福年, 陈斐, 张凯, 王鹤龄, 王润元. 黄土高原地区气候变化及其对冬小麦生产潜力的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(8): 1521-1529.
[8]	高鹏, 高品, 孙蔚旻, 孔天乐, 黄端仪, 刘华清, 孙晓旭. 蜈蚣草根际及内生微生物群落对砷污染胁迫的响应机制研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(6): 1225-1234.
[9]	张恒宇, 孙树臣, 吴元芝, 安娟, 宋红丽. 黄土高原不同植被密度条件下土壤水、碳、氮分布特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(5): 875-884.
[10]	朱奕豪, 李青梅, 刘晓丽, 李娜, 宋凤玲, 陈为峰. 不同土地整治类型新增耕地土壤微生物群落特征研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(5): 909-917.
[11]	王英成, 姚世庭, 金鑫, 俞文政, 芦光新, 王军邦. 三江源区高寒退化草甸土壤细菌多样性的对比研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 695-703.
[12]	邓晓, 武春媛, 杨桂生, 李怡, 李勤奋. 椰壳生物炭对海南滨海土壤的改良效果[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 723-731.
[13]	宋秀丽, 黄瑞龙, 柯彩杰, 黄蔚, 章武, 陶波. 不同种植方式对连作土壤细菌群落结构和多样性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(3): 487-496.
[14]	梅闯, 蔡昆争, 黎紫珊, 徐美丽, 黄飞. 稻秆生物炭对稻田土壤Cd形态转化和微生物群落的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(2): 380-390.
[15]	赵安周, 田新乐. 基于GEE平台的1986-2021年黄土高原植被覆盖度时空演变及影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(11): 2124-2133.