Ecology and Environment ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 160-169.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.01.018
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2021-09-23
Online:
2022-01-18
Published:
2022-03-10
Contact:
ZHAO Ying
通讯作者:
赵颖
作者简介:
王飞(1980年生),男,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为生态环境保护与治理。E-mail: nemo@sxu.edu.cn
基金资助:
CLC Number:
WANG Fei, ZHAO Ying. Pollution Characteristics and Risk Assessment of PAHs in Agricultural Soil from Sewage Irrigation Area of Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(1): 160-169.
王飞, 赵颖. 太原市污灌区农田土壤中多环芳烃污染特征及生态风险评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(1): 160-169.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.01.018
化合物 Compounds | 缩写 Abbreviation | 化合物 Compounds | 缩写 Abbreviation |
---|---|---|---|
萘 | NaP | 苯并[a]蒽 | BaA |
苊烯 | Acy | 䓛 | Chr |
苊 | Ace | 苯并[b]荧蒽 | BbF |
芴 | Flu | 苯并[k]荧蒽 | BkF |
菲 | Phe | 苯并[a]芘 | BaP |
蒽 | Ant | 茚并[1, 2, 3]芘 | InP |
荧蒽 | Flt | 二苯并[a, h]蒽 | BA |
芘 | Pyr | 苯并[ghi]苝 | BP |
Table 1 Standard sample composition of PAHs
化合物 Compounds | 缩写 Abbreviation | 化合物 Compounds | 缩写 Abbreviation |
---|---|---|---|
萘 | NaP | 苯并[a]蒽 | BaA |
苊烯 | Acy | 䓛 | Chr |
苊 | Ace | 苯并[b]荧蒽 | BbF |
芴 | Flu | 苯并[k]荧蒽 | BkF |
菲 | Phe | 苯并[a]芘 | BaP |
蒽 | Ant | 茚并[1, 2, 3]芘 | InP |
荧蒽 | Flt | 二苯并[a, h]蒽 | BA |
芘 | Pyr | 苯并[ghi]苝 | BP |
化合物 Compounds | 环数 Ring | 最小值 Min. | 最大值 Max. | 平均值 Average | 中位数 Median |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NaP | 2 | 14.00 | 1358.40 | 131.86 | 99.30 |
Acy | 3 | 3.10 | 784.34 | 49.55 | 18.60 |
Ace | 3 | 1.50 | 476.35 | 36.84 | 14.46 |
Flu | 3 | 8.10 | 1100.88 | 97.72 | 33.22 |
Phe | 3 | 56.90 | 2864.50 | 366.67 | 223.85 |
Ant | 3 | 3.50 | 980.00 | 96.83 | 31.30 |
Flt | 4 | 21.90 | 2234.90 | 414.13 | 255.90 |
Pyr | 4 | 17.10 | 1805.50 | 302.05 | 171.19 |
BaA | 4 | 6.80 | 1236.40 | 198.00 | 113.25 |
Chr | 4 | 15.50 | 1407.30 | 320.07 | 199.03 |
BbF | 5 | 15.20 | 1525.60 | 376.12 | 236.15 |
BkF | 5 | 7.00 | 532.00 | 120.37 | 68.98 |
BaP | 5 | 9.10 | 531.40 | 178.97 | 117.20 |
BA | 5 | 4.60 | 833.10 | 112.10 | 65.93 |
InP | 6 | 10.30 | 969.50 | 190.13 | 126.63 |
BP | 6 | 10.20 | 813.90 | 196.70 | 133.70 |
ƩPAHs | — | 214.50 | 13511.50 | 3197.57 | 2127.75 |
Table 2 PAHs concentrations in farmland soil µg∙kg-1
化合物 Compounds | 环数 Ring | 最小值 Min. | 最大值 Max. | 平均值 Average | 中位数 Median |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NaP | 2 | 14.00 | 1358.40 | 131.86 | 99.30 |
Acy | 3 | 3.10 | 784.34 | 49.55 | 18.60 |
Ace | 3 | 1.50 | 476.35 | 36.84 | 14.46 |
Flu | 3 | 8.10 | 1100.88 | 97.72 | 33.22 |
Phe | 3 | 56.90 | 2864.50 | 366.67 | 223.85 |
Ant | 3 | 3.50 | 980.00 | 96.83 | 31.30 |
Flt | 4 | 21.90 | 2234.90 | 414.13 | 255.90 |
Pyr | 4 | 17.10 | 1805.50 | 302.05 | 171.19 |
BaA | 4 | 6.80 | 1236.40 | 198.00 | 113.25 |
Chr | 4 | 15.50 | 1407.30 | 320.07 | 199.03 |
BbF | 5 | 15.20 | 1525.60 | 376.12 | 236.15 |
BkF | 5 | 7.00 | 532.00 | 120.37 | 68.98 |
BaP | 5 | 9.10 | 531.40 | 178.97 | 117.20 |
BA | 5 | 4.60 | 833.10 | 112.10 | 65.93 |
InP | 6 | 10.30 | 969.50 | 190.13 | 126.63 |
BP | 6 | 10.20 | 813.90 | 196.70 | 133.70 |
ƩPAHs | — | 214.50 | 13511.50 | 3197.57 | 2127.75 |
研究区域 Area | PAHs种类 Variaties of PAHs | 质量分数范围 Ranges of concentrations | 平均值 Averages | 参考文献 References |
---|---|---|---|---|
沈阳污灌区 | — | 950-2790 | 2133 | Song et al., |
沈抚石油类污灌区 | — | 787-24600 | 4950 | 曲健等, |
乌鲁木齐某污灌区 | 16 | 8720-10926 | 9992 | 王雪萍等, |
辽宁浑蒲灌区 | 16 | 620-1040 | 795 | 高昌源等, |
太原污灌区 | 16 | 214-13511 | 3198 | 本研究 |
Table 3 PAHs concentrations in other sewage irrigation areas µg∙kg-1
研究区域 Area | PAHs种类 Variaties of PAHs | 质量分数范围 Ranges of concentrations | 平均值 Averages | 参考文献 References |
---|---|---|---|---|
沈阳污灌区 | — | 950-2790 | 2133 | Song et al., |
沈抚石油类污灌区 | — | 787-24600 | 4950 | 曲健等, |
乌鲁木齐某污灌区 | 16 | 8720-10926 | 9992 | 王雪萍等, |
辽宁浑蒲灌区 | 16 | 620-1040 | 795 | 高昌源等, |
太原污灌区 | 16 | 214-13511 | 3198 | 本研究 |
PAHs | 小店区 Xiaodian area | 晋源区 Jinyuan area | 清徐县 Qingxu area | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC1 | PC2 | PC1 | PC2 | |||
NaP | 0.414 | 0.135 | -0.057 | 0.897 | -0.257 | 0.25 | ||
Ace | -0.043 | 0.923 | 0.039 | 0.944 | 0.737 | 0.413 | ||
Acy | -0.04 | 0.889 | 0.844 | 0.333 | 0.09 | 0.92 | ||
Flu | -0.098 | 0.983 | 0.65 | 0.615 | 0.369 | 0.822 | ||
Phe | 0.553 | 0.784 | 0.322 | 0.876 | 0.893 | 0.156 | ||
Ant | 0.007 | 0.995 | 0.172 | 0.96 | 0.902 | 0.27 | ||
Flt | 0.817 | 0.542 | 0.466 | 0.841 | 0.965 | 0.078 | ||
Pyr | 0.954 | 0.244 | 0.477 | 0.819 | 0.944 | 0.17 | ||
BaA | 0.969 | -0.111 | 0.503 | 0.801 | 0.973 | 0.087 | ||
Chr | 0.979 | -0.172 | 0.68 | 0.561 | 0.932 | 0.08 | ||
BbF | 0.973 | -0.146 | 0.768 | 0.175 | 0.948 | 0.085 | ||
BkF | 0.986 | 0.012 | 0.892 | 0.079 | 0.968 | 0.118 | ||
BaP | 0.986 | 0.123 | 0.874 | 0.16 | 0.977 | 0.046 | ||
BA | 0.967 | -0.201 | 0.908 | 0.227 | 0.968 | 0.085 | ||
InP | 0.99 | -0.078 | 0.887 | 0.233 | 0.976 | 0.069 | ||
BP | 0.963 | 0.236 | 0.909 | 0.139 | 0.955 | 0.087 | ||
特征值 | 9.698 | 4.767 | 7.018 | 6.395 | 11.596 | 1.944 | ||
方差贡献率% | 60.615 | 29.795 | 43.860 | 39.970 | 72.474 | 12.150 |
Table 4 Rotational component matrix of PAHs
PAHs | 小店区 Xiaodian area | 晋源区 Jinyuan area | 清徐县 Qingxu area | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC1 | PC2 | PC1 | PC2 | |||
NaP | 0.414 | 0.135 | -0.057 | 0.897 | -0.257 | 0.25 | ||
Ace | -0.043 | 0.923 | 0.039 | 0.944 | 0.737 | 0.413 | ||
Acy | -0.04 | 0.889 | 0.844 | 0.333 | 0.09 | 0.92 | ||
Flu | -0.098 | 0.983 | 0.65 | 0.615 | 0.369 | 0.822 | ||
Phe | 0.553 | 0.784 | 0.322 | 0.876 | 0.893 | 0.156 | ||
Ant | 0.007 | 0.995 | 0.172 | 0.96 | 0.902 | 0.27 | ||
Flt | 0.817 | 0.542 | 0.466 | 0.841 | 0.965 | 0.078 | ||
Pyr | 0.954 | 0.244 | 0.477 | 0.819 | 0.944 | 0.17 | ||
BaA | 0.969 | -0.111 | 0.503 | 0.801 | 0.973 | 0.087 | ||
Chr | 0.979 | -0.172 | 0.68 | 0.561 | 0.932 | 0.08 | ||
BbF | 0.973 | -0.146 | 0.768 | 0.175 | 0.948 | 0.085 | ||
BkF | 0.986 | 0.012 | 0.892 | 0.079 | 0.968 | 0.118 | ||
BaP | 0.986 | 0.123 | 0.874 | 0.16 | 0.977 | 0.046 | ||
BA | 0.967 | -0.201 | 0.908 | 0.227 | 0.968 | 0.085 | ||
InP | 0.99 | -0.078 | 0.887 | 0.233 | 0.976 | 0.069 | ||
BP | 0.963 | 0.236 | 0.909 | 0.139 | 0.955 | 0.087 | ||
特征值 | 9.698 | 4.767 | 7.018 | 6.395 | 11.596 | 1.944 | ||
方差贡献率% | 60.615 | 29.795 | 43.860 | 39.970 | 72.474 | 12.150 |
研究区 Study area | 模型 Model | 回归 Regression | 残差 Residual | 总计 Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
小店区 | 平方和 | 33.98 | 0.02 | 34 |
df | 2 | 32 | 34 | |
均方 | 16.99 | 0.001 | ||
F | 27796.467 | |||
Sig. | 0.000a | |||
晋源区 | 平方和 | 33.895 | 0.105 | 34 |
df | 2 | 32 | 34 | |
均方 | 16.948 | 0.003 | ||
F | 5176.184 | |||
Sig. | 0.000a | |||
清徐县 | 平方和 | 38.59 | 0.41 | 39 |
df | 2 | 37 | 39 | |
均方 | 19.295 | 0.011 | ||
F | 1741.227 | |||
Sig. | 0.000a |
Table 5 Variance analysis of regression equation
研究区 Study area | 模型 Model | 回归 Regression | 残差 Residual | 总计 Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
小店区 | 平方和 | 33.98 | 0.02 | 34 |
df | 2 | 32 | 34 | |
均方 | 16.99 | 0.001 | ||
F | 27796.467 | |||
Sig. | 0.000a | |||
晋源区 | 平方和 | 33.895 | 0.105 | 34 |
df | 2 | 32 | 34 | |
均方 | 16.948 | 0.003 | ||
F | 5176.184 | |||
Sig. | 0.000a | |||
清徐县 | 平方和 | 38.59 | 0.41 | 39 |
df | 2 | 37 | 39 | |
均方 | 19.295 | 0.011 | ||
F | 1741.227 | |||
Sig. | 0.000a |
研究区 Study area | 模型 Model | 常量 Constant | 回归因子得分REGR factor score 1 for analysis 2 | 回归因子得分REGR factor score 2 for analysis 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
小店区 | 非标准化系数 | B | 1.10×10-16 | 0.896 | 0.443 |
标准误差 | 0.006 | 0.004 | 0.004 | ||
标准系数 | Beta | 0.896 | 0.443 | ||
t | 0 | 211.405 | 104.407 | ||
Sig. | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
晋源区 | 非标准化系数 | B | -7.45×10-17 | 0.75 | 0.659 |
标准误差 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
标准系数 | Beta | 0.75 | 0.659 | ||
t | 0 | 76.463 | 67.125 | ||
Sig. | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
清徐县 | 非标准化系数 | B | -3.15×10-16 | 0.986 | 0.134 |
标准误差 | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.017 | ||
标准系数 | Beta | 0.986 | 0.134 | ||
t | 0 | 58.476 | 7.94 | ||
Sig. | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Table 6 Coefficients of the regression model
研究区 Study area | 模型 Model | 常量 Constant | 回归因子得分REGR factor score 1 for analysis 2 | 回归因子得分REGR factor score 2 for analysis 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
小店区 | 非标准化系数 | B | 1.10×10-16 | 0.896 | 0.443 |
标准误差 | 0.006 | 0.004 | 0.004 | ||
标准系数 | Beta | 0.896 | 0.443 | ||
t | 0 | 211.405 | 104.407 | ||
Sig. | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
晋源区 | 非标准化系数 | B | -7.45×10-17 | 0.75 | 0.659 |
标准误差 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
标准系数 | Beta | 0.75 | 0.659 | ||
t | 0 | 76.463 | 67.125 | ||
Sig. | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
清徐县 | 非标准化系数 | B | -3.15×10-16 | 0.986 | 0.134 |
标准误差 | 0.017 | 0.017 | 0.017 | ||
标准系数 | Beta | 0.986 | 0.134 | ||
t | 0 | 58.476 | 7.94 | ||
Sig. | 1 | 0 | 0 |
地区 Study area | QMERM | QMERM均值 Mean of QMERM | 污染程度 Pollution level | 样品比例 Sample proportion/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<0.1 | 0.1<QMERM<0.5 | 0.5<QMERM <1.5 | QMERM>1.5 | ||||
小店区 | 0.05-0.40 | 0.2 | 中低毒性 | 25.71 | 74.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
晋源区 | 0.02-0.46 | 0.18 | 中低毒性 | 31.43 | 68.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
清徐县 | 0.01-0.26 | 0.04 | 低毒性 | 97.50 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Table 7 Potential ecological risk assessment of 15 PAHs
地区 Study area | QMERM | QMERM均值 Mean of QMERM | 污染程度 Pollution level | 样品比例 Sample proportion/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<0.1 | 0.1<QMERM<0.5 | 0.5<QMERM <1.5 | QMERM>1.5 | ||||
小店区 | 0.05-0.40 | 0.2 | 中低毒性 | 25.71 | 74.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
晋源区 | 0.02-0.46 | 0.18 | 中低毒性 | 31.43 | 68.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
清徐县 | 0.01-0.26 | 0.04 | 低毒性 | 97.50 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
多环芳烃 PAHs | 小店区 Xiaodian area | 晋源区 Jinyuan area | 清徐县 Qingxu area | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值 Min. | 最大值 Max. | 平均值 Mean | 最小值 Min. | 最大值 Max. | 平均值 Mean | 最小值 Min. | 最大值 Max. | 平均值 Mean | |||
萘 | 0.03 | 0.35 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 1.36 | 0.2 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.05 | ||
苊 | 0 | 0.48 | 0.07 | 0 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.01 | ||
苊烯 | 0.01 | 0.78 | 0.11 | 0 | 0.28 | 0.04 | 0 | 0.04 | 0.01 | ||
芴 | 0.01 | 1.1 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 0.35 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.02 | ||
菲 | 0.13 | 1.2 | 0.44 | 0.06 | 2.86 | 0.56 | 0.06 | 0.52 | 0.13 | ||
蒽 | 0.18 | 7.28 | 1.63 | 0.05 | 9.8 | 1.24 | 0.04 | 0.87 | 0.15 | ||
荧蒽 | 0.12 | 1.54 | 0.63 | 0.04 | 2.23 | 0.54 | 0.02 | 0.99 | 0.11 | ||
芘 | 0.08 | 1.21 | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1.81 | 0.39 | 0.02 | 0.77 | 0.09 | ||
苯并(a)蒽 | 5.81 | 95.89 | 27.37 | 1.76 | 123.64 | 28.41 | 0.68 | 52.2 | 5.64 | ||
䓛 | 1.3 | 12.87 | 4.7 | 0.39 | 14.07 | 4.21 | 0.16 | 7.19 | 1 | ||
苯并(b)荧蒽 | 15.52 | 152.56 | 60.73 | 4.36 | 133 | 42.77 | 1.52 | 86.25 | 12.88 | ||
苯并(k)荧蒽 | 4.4 | 53.2 | 20.54 | 1.46 | 45.71 | 12.96 | 0.7 | 29.71 | 3.79 | ||
苯并(a)芘 | 62 | 522 | 290.36 | 20.4 | 531.4 | 207.09 | 9.1 | 498.5 | 56.89 | ||
茚并(123-c, d)芘 | 5.84 | 90.28 | 29.51 | 2.47 | 96.95 | 24.34 | 1.03 | 45.44 | 5.17 | ||
二苯并(a, h)蒽 | 34.2 | 534 | 159.66 | 14.3 | 833.1 | 150.46 | 4.6 | 255 | 31.91 | ||
苯并[g, h, i]苝 | 0.59 | 8.11 | 3.04 | 0.26 | 8.14 | 2.49 | 0.1 | 4.27 | 0.57 | ||
16PAHs | 130.54 | 1774.58 | 599.58 | 45.64 | 2022.37 | 475.83 | 18.08 | 981.83 | 118.43 | ||
7carPAHs | 129.07 | 1460.8 | 592.87 | 45.14 | 1777.87 | 470.24 | 17.79 | 974.29 | 117.28 |
Table 8 Toxic equivalent concentration of 16 PAHs μg∙kg-1
多环芳烃 PAHs | 小店区 Xiaodian area | 晋源区 Jinyuan area | 清徐县 Qingxu area | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值 Min. | 最大值 Max. | 平均值 Mean | 最小值 Min. | 最大值 Max. | 平均值 Mean | 最小值 Min. | 最大值 Max. | 平均值 Mean | |||
萘 | 0.03 | 0.35 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 1.36 | 0.2 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.05 | ||
苊 | 0 | 0.48 | 0.07 | 0 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.01 | ||
苊烯 | 0.01 | 0.78 | 0.11 | 0 | 0.28 | 0.04 | 0 | 0.04 | 0.01 | ||
芴 | 0.01 | 1.1 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 0.35 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.02 | ||
菲 | 0.13 | 1.2 | 0.44 | 0.06 | 2.86 | 0.56 | 0.06 | 0.52 | 0.13 | ||
蒽 | 0.18 | 7.28 | 1.63 | 0.05 | 9.8 | 1.24 | 0.04 | 0.87 | 0.15 | ||
荧蒽 | 0.12 | 1.54 | 0.63 | 0.04 | 2.23 | 0.54 | 0.02 | 0.99 | 0.11 | ||
芘 | 0.08 | 1.21 | 0.45 | 0.03 | 1.81 | 0.39 | 0.02 | 0.77 | 0.09 | ||
苯并(a)蒽 | 5.81 | 95.89 | 27.37 | 1.76 | 123.64 | 28.41 | 0.68 | 52.2 | 5.64 | ||
䓛 | 1.3 | 12.87 | 4.7 | 0.39 | 14.07 | 4.21 | 0.16 | 7.19 | 1 | ||
苯并(b)荧蒽 | 15.52 | 152.56 | 60.73 | 4.36 | 133 | 42.77 | 1.52 | 86.25 | 12.88 | ||
苯并(k)荧蒽 | 4.4 | 53.2 | 20.54 | 1.46 | 45.71 | 12.96 | 0.7 | 29.71 | 3.79 | ||
苯并(a)芘 | 62 | 522 | 290.36 | 20.4 | 531.4 | 207.09 | 9.1 | 498.5 | 56.89 | ||
茚并(123-c, d)芘 | 5.84 | 90.28 | 29.51 | 2.47 | 96.95 | 24.34 | 1.03 | 45.44 | 5.17 | ||
二苯并(a, h)蒽 | 34.2 | 534 | 159.66 | 14.3 | 833.1 | 150.46 | 4.6 | 255 | 31.91 | ||
苯并[g, h, i]苝 | 0.59 | 8.11 | 3.04 | 0.26 | 8.14 | 2.49 | 0.1 | 4.27 | 0.57 | ||
16PAHs | 130.54 | 1774.58 | 599.58 | 45.64 | 2022.37 | 475.83 | 18.08 | 981.83 | 118.43 | ||
7carPAHs | 129.07 | 1460.8 | 592.87 | 45.14 | 1777.87 | 470.24 | 17.79 | 974.29 | 117.28 |
[1] |
AGARWAL T, KHILLARE P S, SHRIDHAR V, et al., 2008. Pattern, sources and toxic potential of PAHs in the agricultural soils of Delhi, India[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 163(2-3): 1033-1039.
DOI URL |
[2] |
ATHANASIOS V, KONSTANTINOS F, THOMAIS V, et al., 2006. Characterization of atmospheric particulates, particle-bound transition metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of urban air in the centre of Athens (Greece)[J]. Chemosphere, 65(5): 760-768.
DOI URL |
[3] | CHEN Y, ZHANG J Q, ZHANG F, et al., 2017. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in farmland soils around main reservoirs of Jilin Province, China: Occurrence, sources and potential human health risk[J]. Environmental Geochemistry & Health, 40(2-3): 1-12. |
[4] | FU X W, LI T Y, JI L, et al., 2018. Occurrence, sources and health risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils around oil wells in the border regions between oil fields and suburbs[J]. Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety, 157: 276-284. |
[5] |
GAO Y Z, ZENG Y C, SHEN Q, et al., 2009. Fractionation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon residues in soils[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 172(2-3): 897-903.
DOI URL |
[6] | GE W CHENG Q Q, CHAI C, et al., 2017. Pollution characteristics and source analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in agricultural soils from Shandong[J]. Environmental Science, 38(4): 1587-1596. |
[7] |
KAVOURAS I G, KOUTRAKIS P, TSAPAKIS M, et al., 2001. Source apportionment of urban particulate aliphatic and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) using multivariate methods[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 35(11): 2288-2294.
DOI URL |
[8] |
KHALILI N R, SCHEFF P A, HOLSEN T M., 1995. PAH source fingerprints for coke ovens, diesel and gasoline engines, highway tunnels, and wood combustion emissions[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 29(4): 533-542.
DOI URL |
[9] |
KOHLER M, KUNNIGER T, SCHMID P, et al., 2000. Inventory and emission factors of creosote, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and phenols from railroad ties treated with creosote[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 34(22): 4766-4772.
DOI URL |
[10] |
LARSEN R K, BAKER J E, 2003. Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the urban atmosphere: A comparison of three methods[J]. Environmental Science Technology, 37(9): 1873-1881.
DOI URL |
[11] |
LEE Y N, LEE S, KIM J S, et al., 2019. Chemical analysis techniques and investigation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in fruit, vegetables and meats and their products[J]. Food Chemistry, 277: 156-161.
DOI URL |
[12] | LIN C, LIU J L, WANG R M, et al., 2013. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface soils of Kunming, China: Concentrations, distribution, sources, and potential risk[J]. Journal of Soil Contamination, 22(7): 753-766. |
[13] |
LONG E R, MACDONALD D, SMITH S L, 1995. Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments[J]. Environmental Management, 19(1): 81-97.
DOI URL |
[14] |
MCCREADY S, BIRCH G F, LONG E R, et al., 2006. Predictive abilities of numerical sediment quality guidelines in Sydney Harbour, Australia, and vicinity[J]. Environment International, 32(5): 638-649.
DOI URL |
[15] |
MEN B, HE M C, TAN L, et al., 2009. Distributions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the Daliao River estuary of Liaodong Bay, Bohai Sea (China)[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58(6): 818-826.
DOI URL |
[16] |
RAVINDRA K, BENCS L, WAUTERS E, et al., 2006. Seasonal and site-specific variation in vapour and aerosol phase PAHs over Flanders (Belgium) and their relation with anthropogenic activities[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 40(4): 771-785.
DOI URL |
[17] |
REIKO K, ROBERT A O, RANDY L, et al., 2008. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in edible grain: A pilot study of agricultural crops as a human exposure pathway for environmental contaminants using wheat as a model crop[J]. Environmental Research, 107(2): 145-151.
DOI URL |
[18] |
SONG Y F, WILKE B M, SONG X Y, et al., 2006. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and heavy metals(HMs) as well as their genotoxicity in soil after long-term wastewater irrigation[J]. Chemosphere, 65(10): 1859-1868.
DOI URL |
[19] |
WIT G T, TROST E, 1999. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediments of the Baltic sea and of the German Coastal Waters[J]. Chemosphere, 38(7): 1603-1614.
DOI URL |
[20] |
XU D C, ZHOU P, ZHAN J, et al., 2013. Assessment of trace metal bioavailability in garden soils and health risks via consumption of vegetables in the vicinity of Tongling mining area, China[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 90: 103-111.
DOI URL |
[21] |
XU Y F, DAI S X, MENG K, et al., 2018. Occurrence and risk assessment of potentially toxic elements and typical organic pollutants in contaminated rural soils[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 630: 618-629.
DOI URL |
[22] |
YADAV I C, DEVI N L, LI J, et al., 2017. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in house dust and surface soil in major urban regions of Nepal: Implication on source apportionment and toxicological effect[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 616-617: 223-235.
DOI URL |
[23] |
ZHOU J L, SIDDIQUI E, NGO H H, et al., 2014. Estimation of uncertainty in the sampling and analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soil in Brighton, UK[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 497-498: 163-171.
DOI URL |
[24] | 蔡杨, 李伟, 左雪燕, 等, 2021. 盐城滨海湿地土壤多环芳烃分布特征及影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 30(6): 1249-1259. |
CAI Y, LI W, ZUO X Y, et al., 2021. Distribution characteristics and influencing factors of PAHs in Yancheng coastal wetland soil[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 30(6): 1249-1259. | |
[25] | 陈庆锋, 马君健, 郭贝贝, 2016. 山东省农业典型地区土壤中PAHs分布特征、来源及生态风险评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 25(6): 1006-1013. |
CHEN Q F, MA J J, GUO B B, 2016. The distribution characterization/ sources and risk assessment of PAHs in different agriculture typical areas of Shandong Province[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 25(6): 1006-1013. | |
[26] | 高昌源, 刘丹, 郭美霞, 2016. 辽宁典型污灌区及公路沿线农田土壤多环芳烃污染特征及来源分析[J]. 环境保护与循环经济, 36(9): 46-51. |
GAO C Y, LIU D, GUO M X, 2016. Pollution characteristics and source analysis of PAHs in farmland soil from typical sewage irrigation area and Central Loop Highway of Liaoning province[J]. Environmental Protection and Circular Economy, 36(9): 46-51. | |
[27] | 葛蔚, 程琪琪, 柴超, 等, 2017. 山东省农田土壤多环芳烃的污染特征及源解析[J]. 环境科学, 38(4): 1587-1596. |
GE W, CHENG Q Q, CHAI C, et al., 2017. Pollution Characteristics and Source Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Agricultural Soils from Shandong[J]. Environmental Science, 38(4): 1587-1596 | |
[28] | 韩文辉, 党晋华, 赵颖, 2016. 污灌区重金属和多环芳烃复合污染及其对农田土壤微生物数量的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 25(9): 1562-1568. |
HAN W H, DANG J H, ZHAO Y, 2016. Compound pollution of heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sewage irrigation area and its effect on soil microbial quantity[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 25(9): 1562-1568. | |
[29] | 环境保护部, 2016. 土壤和沉积物多环芳烃的测定气相色谱-质谱法:HJ 805-2016[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社: 3-10. |
Ministry of Environmental Protection, 2016. Soil and sediment- determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method: HJ 805-2016[S]. publisher-loc: China Environmental Science Press: 3-10. | |
[30] | 李恭臣, 夏星辉, 王然, 等, 2006. 黄河中下游水体中多环芳烃的分布及来源[J]. 环境科学, 27(9): 1738-1743. |
LI G C, XIA X H, WANG R, et al., 2006. Pollution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Environmental Science, 27(9): 1738-1743. | |
[31] | 廖书林, 郎印海, 王延松, 2011. 辽河口湿地土壤多环芳烃的分布及来源研究[J]. 环境科学, 32(4): 1094-1100. |
LIAO S L, LANG Y H, WANG Y S, 2011. Distribution and Sources of PAHs in Soil from Liaohe Estuarine Wetland[J]. Environmental Science, 32(4): 1094-1100. | |
[32] | 刘庚, 牛俊杰, 王玲, 等, 2017. 污灌区农田土壤多环芳烃污染及风险评价[J]. 环境化学, 36(7): 1622-1629. |
LIU G, NIU J J, WANG L, et al., 2017. Contamination and risk assessment of PAHs in agricultural soil from wastewater irrigated area[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 36(7): 1622-1629. | |
[33] | 刘小娟, 2010. 太原污灌区土壤有效态及作物重金属含量分析[D]. 太原: 山西大学: 7-8. |
LIU X J, 2010. Analysis of Taiyuan sewage irrigation areas available heavy metals content in soils and crops[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi University: 7-8. | |
[34] | 曲健, 宋云横, 苏娜. 沈抚灌区上游土壤中多环芳烃的含量分析[J]. 中国环境监测, 2006, 22(3): 29-31. |
QU J, SONG Y H, SU N, 2006. Analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in upriver soil of Shen-Fu irrigation area[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 22(3): 29-31. | |
[35] | 生态环境部, 2018. 土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准 (试行): GB 15618-2018[S]. 北京: 中国环境出版集团: 2-3. |
Ministry of Ecology Environment, 2018. Soil environmental quality Risk control standard for soil contamination of agricultural land: GB 15618-2018[S]. Beijing: China Environmental Publishing Group: 2-3. | |
[36] | 孙海峰, 张勇, 解静芳, 2015. 正定矩阵因子分解模型在环境中多环芳烃源解析方面的应用[J]. 生态毒理学报, 10(4): 25-33. |
SUN H F, ZHANG Y, XIE J F, 2015. Applications of positive matrix factorization (PMF)for source apportionment of PAHs in the environment[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 10(4): 25-33. | |
[37] | 王雪萍, 王庆, 吴启豪, 等, 2020. 某污灌区土壤中多环芳烃形态分析及风险评价[J]. 环境科学与技术, 43(4): 192-198. |
[38] | WANG X P, WANG Q, WU Q H, et al., 2020. Species analysis and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil of a sewage irrigation area[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(4): 192-198. |
[39] | 张倩, 狄晓艳, 武冬梅, 等, 2014. 种植黑麦草对山西工矿区多环芳烃和重金属复合污染土壤微生物群落多样性的影响[J]. 山西师范大学学报 (自然科学版), 28(2): 82-88. |
ZHANG Q, DI X Y, WU D M, et al., 2014. Effect of ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metal contaminated soil microbial community diversity in Shanxi Mining Areas[J]. Journal of Shanxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 28(2): 82-88. | |
[40] | 翟梦晓, 2011. 黄淮水系河南段表层沉积物中多环芳烃的赋存特征及来源解析[D]. 新乡: 河南师范大学: 32-35. |
ZHAI M X, 2011. Distribution and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediment from Henan reach of Huaihe, Huanghe water[D]. Xinxiang: Henan Normal University: 32-35. | |
[41] | 周洁, 张敬锁, 刘晓霞, 等, 2019. 北京市郊农田土壤中多环芳烃污染特征及风险评价[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 36(4):534-540. |
ZHOU J, ZHANG J S, LIU X X, et al., 2019. Pollution characteristics and risk assessment of PAHs in agricultural soil in suburb of Beijing[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 36(4): 534-540. |
[1] | HAO Lei, ZHAI Yongguang, QI Wenchao, LAN Qiongqiong. Spatial-temporal Dynamics of Vegetation Carbon Sources/sinks in Inner Mongolia from 2001 to 2020 and Its Response to Climate Change [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 825-834. |
[2] | XU Xiaoyun, RAO Zhihan, JIANG Hongbin, ZHANG Wei, CHEN Chao, YANG Yongan, HU Yanli, WEI Haichuan. Pollution Characteristics and Formation Potential for O3 and SOA of Ambient VOCs in Suining Industrial Zone in Summer [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 956-968. |
[3] | QIAN Haiming, ZHANG Yunlin, LI Na, WANG Weijia, SUN Xiao, ZHANG Yibo, SHI Kun, FENG Sheng, GAO Yanghui. High Frequency Monitoring of Water Quality Dynamics for River Drinking Water Source during the Typical Rainfall Process [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 579-589. |
[4] | YANG Qili, DOU Weili, LIU Zhiwen, GUO Jing, LÜ Gang. Analysis of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Pollution Characteristics and Influencing Factors Based on N-alkanes Tracing in the River Channel of Fuxin Xihe River [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 599-608. |
[5] | FU Chuanbo, DAN Li, TONG Jinhe, CHEN Hong. Characteristics and Potential Source Analysis of Ozone pollution in Haikou City [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(2): 331-340. |
[6] | LI Haiyan, YANG Xiaoqin, JAN Meipeng, ZHANG Xiaoran. [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(2): 407-420. |
[7] | TONG Yindong, HUANG Lanlan, YANG Ning, ZHANG Yiyan, LI Zipeng, SHAO Bo. Distribution Characteristics and Potential Environmental Risk Analysis of Microcystins in Global Water Bodies [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(1): 129-138. |
[8] | JIANG Ming, ZHANG Ziyang, LI Tingting, LIN Boji, ZHANG Zhengen, LIAO Tong, YUAN Luan, PAN Suhong, LI Jun, ZHANG Gan. Source Apportionment of Ammonium in Atmospheric PM2.5 in the Pearl River Delta Based on Nitrogen Isotope [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(9): 1840-1848. |
[9] | HAO Beibei, WANG Nan, WU Haoping, ZHOU Zhixin, ZHANG Siyi, HE Bin. Research on the Reduction Function of Ecological Ditches on Runoff Pollution from Rice Field in the Pearl River Delta [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(9): 1856-1864. |
[10] | WU Haoping, QIN Hongjie, HE Bin, YOU Yi, CHEN Jinfeng, ZOU Chunping, YANG Siyu, HAO Beibei. A Brief Discussion on the Development Trend of the Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution Control Model Based on Carbon Neutrality [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(9): 1919-1926. |
[11] | WANG Molei, LI Zhihui, CHEN Laiguo, GUO Songjun, LIU Ming, WANG Shuo, LU Haitao. Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers in Flue Gas from Municipal Waste Incineration Plants and Surrounding Soil Pollution Characteristics [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(8): 1582-1589. |
[12] | FAN Keyu, GAO Yuan, LAI Zini, ZENG Yanyi, LIU Qianfu, LI Haiyan, MAI Yongzhan, YANG Wanling, WEI Jingxin, SUN Jinhui, WANG Chao. Characteristics of Microplastic Pollution in Fish in the Pearl River Delta [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(8): 1590-1598. |
[13] | SHI Wenjing, ZHOU Hanpeng, SUN Tao, HUANG Jintao, YANG Wenhuan, LI Weiping. Research on Priority Control Factors and Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Soil Around Mining Areas [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(8): 1616-1628. |
[14] | LI Xiuhua, ZHAO Ling, TENG Ying, LUO Yongming, HUANG Biao, LIU Chong, LIU Benle, ZHAO Qiguo. Characteristics, Spatial Distribution and Risk Assessment of Combined Mercury and Cadmium Pollution in Farmland Soils Surrounding Mercury Mining Areas in Guizhou [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(8): 1629-1636. |
[15] | ZHU Li, YAN Huaizhong, SUN Youmin, FAN Jing, LIU Guanghui, ZHNG Guiqin. Characteristics and Source Identification of Dust Precipitates in A Typical Heavy Industry Area in Shandong [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(7): 1393-1399. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn