2000年以来浐灞河流域不同地貌区植被变化特征及影响因素研究

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.02.002

生态环境学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 224-230.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.02.002

2000年以来浐灞河流域不同地貌区植被变化特征及影响因素研究

杨媛媛¹^,²^,³(), 佘志鹏¹, 宋进喜², 朱大为⁴

1.西安浐灞生态区博士后科研工作站,陕西西安 710024
2.西北大学城市与环境学院,陕西西安 710127
3.西安理工大学/省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,陕西西安 710048
4.国网陕西省电力有限公司,陕西西安 710048

收稿日期:2021-09-08 出版日期:2022-02-18 发布日期:2022-04-14
作者简介:杨媛媛（1990年生）,女,博士,主要从事生态水文方面研究。E-mail: run19930512@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41877077)

Study on Vegetation Variation Characteristics and Influencing Factors in Different Geomorphic Zones in the Chanbahe River Basin since 2000

YANG Yuanyuan¹^,²^,³(), SHE Zhipeng¹, SONG Jinxi², ZHU Dawei⁴

1. Xi'an Chanba Ecological Zone Postdoctoral Research Station, Xi'an 710024, P. R. China
2. School of City and Environment, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, P. R. China
3. State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region/Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, P. R. China
4. State Grid Shaanxi Electric Power Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710048, P. R. China

Received:2021-09-08 Online:2022-02-18 Published:2022-04-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

秦岭是中国南北气候分界线。2000年以来植被的快速恢复,对该区域生态水文过程产生了深远的影响。秦岭地区地貌多样,分析不同地貌区植被恢复特征、影响因素及其对生态水文过程的影响,对秦岭生态环境保护具有重要的借鉴意义。以位于秦岭北坡的浐灞河流域为研究对象,将整个研究区分为上游山地区、中游丘陵区和下游平原区3个分区,以归一化植被指数（NDVI）为基础数据,基于趋势分析和回归分析等方法,研究了浐灞河流域不同地貌区的植被恢复差异、影响因素及其对径流输沙的影响。结果表明,浐灞河流域上游山地区NDVI值呈极显著增加趋势,中游丘陵区NDVI值呈缓慢增加趋势,而下游平原区呈极显著减少趋势。上游山地区NDVI在6—9月处于较高水平,中游丘陵区和下游平原区NDVI的年内分布呈现双峰特征。整个浐灞河流域的植被恢复速度为0.0019/a,上游山地区、中游丘陵区以及下游平原区的植被恢复速度存在显著差异（P<0.05）。上游山地区海拔对植被恢复速度具有显著影响（P<0.05）,中游地区不同坡度的植被恢复存在显著差异（P<0.05）。上游山地区植被恢复的主要驱动力是林地自身植被覆盖度的提升,中游丘陵区部分林地覆盖度的提升是这一区域植被覆盖度提升的主要原因,而下游平原区耕地转为建设用地是植被退化的主要原因。年降水量对上游山地区的植被覆盖度影响不显著,但对中游丘陵区的植被覆盖度具有极显著的正相关关系（P<0.001）。在浐灞河流域,植被恢复对径流量的影响较小,而对土壤侵蚀模数影响较大。综上,植被在秦岭北坡不同地貌区的恢复特征和影响因素不同,深入研究植被恢复的时空差异及其对气象因子的响应,对于秦岭地区植被保护具有重要意义。

关键词: 植被恢复, 秦岭, 地貌, 趋势分析, NDVI, 西安浐灞生态区

Abstract:

The Qinling Mountains form a climatic boundary between northern and southern China. The rapid restoration of vegetation since 2000 has had a profound impact on the eco-hydrological processes of this region. The Qinling Mountains consist of diverse geomorphic landforms. Thus, analyses of vegetation restoration characteristics, influencing factors, and their influences on eco-hydrological processes in different landforms are important for environmental protection in the region. We investigated the Chanbahe River Basin on the northern slope of the Qinling Mountains, and divided the study area into three zones (i.e., the upstream mountainous zone, the midstream hilly zone, and the downstream plain zone). Based on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), we conducted trend and regression analyses to explore the differences in vegetation restoration, the influencing factors, and their effects on runoff and sediment transport. The results showed that the NDVI values had a highly significant increasing trend in the upstream mountainous zone, a gradual increasing trend in the midstream hilly zone, and a highly significant decreasing trend in the downstream plain zone. In the upstream mountainous zone, the NDVI value was the highest from June to September, whereas in the midstream hilly and downstream plain zones, the annual NDVI distribution showed a double-peak. The vegetation restoration speed across the entire basin was 0.0019/a but showed significant differences among the three zones (P<0.05). Altitude had a significant influence on the vegetation restoration speed in the upstream mountainous zone (P<0.05). Furthermore, the vegetation restoration speed showed significant differences among different slope gradients in the midstream zone (P<0.05). The primary driver of vegetation restoration in the upstream mountainous midstream hilly zones was an increase in vegetation coverage in the forest land. The main cause of vegetation degradation in the downstream plain zone was the conversion of farmland into construction land. Annual precipitation had a non-significant influence on vegetation coverage in the upstream mountainous zone but was significantly positively correlated with vegetation coverage in the midstream hilly zone (P<0.001). Across the basin, vegetation restoration had little influence on the runoff volume but a considerable effect on the soil erosion modulus. In summary, vegetation restoration characteristics and influencing factors varied among the three geomorphic zones on the northern slope of the Qinling Mountains. Further in-depth study on the spatiotemporal differences in vegetation restoration and its response to meteorological factors should be conducted for the improvement of vegetation protection in the Qinling Mountains.

Key words: vegetation restoration, Qinling mountains, geomorphic, trend analysis, NDVI, Xi'an Chanba ecological district

中图分类号:

F205
X17

杨媛媛, 佘志鹏, 宋进喜, 朱大为. 2000年以来浐灞河流域不同地貌区植被变化特征及影响因素研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(2): 224-230.

YANG Yuanyuan, SHE Zhipeng, SONG Jinxi, ZHU Dawei. Study on Vegetation Variation Characteristics and Influencing Factors in Different Geomorphic Zones in the Chanbahe River Basin since 2000[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(2): 224-230.

图/表 8

图1 研究区概况

Figure 1 Overview of the study area

图2 浐灞河流域不同地貌分区NDVI变化特征

Figure 2 NDVI variation characteristics of different geomorphological zone units in the Chanba river basin

图3 浐灞流域典型年份的NDVI图

Figure 3 NDVI map of Chanba river basin in 2000, 2010 and 2020

图4 浐灞河流域NDVI的年内变化特征

Figure 4 The characteristics of the annual variation of NDVI in the Chanba River Basin

图5 浐灞河流域植被恢复趋势

Figure 5 The trends of vegetation restoration in Chanbar river basin

表1 2000—2020年研究区土地利用转移及植被恢复速度

Table 1 The land use transfer and the rate of vegetation restoration in the study area from 2000 to 2020

地貌分区 Geomorphological zone	土地利用变化 Land use change	比例 Proportion/%	植被恢复速度 Vegetation restoration rate
上游山地区 Upstream mountainous area	林地→林地	90.98	0.0036
	耕地→耕地	5.84	0.0038
	耕地→林地	1.65	0.0040
	其他	1.53	—
中游丘陵区 Midstream hilly area	耕地→耕地	73.19	0.0003
	林地→林地	9.64	0.0043
	建设用地→建设用地	6.13	-0.0002
	耕地→建设用地	6.07	0.0004
	其他	4.97	—
下游平原区 Downstream plain area	耕地→建设用地	37.84	-0.0055
	建设用地→建设用地	32.62	-0.0008
	耕地→耕地	25.47	-0.0043
	其他	4.07	—

图6 不同分区NDVI与年降水量回归分析

Figure 6 Regression analysis of NDVI and annual precipitation in different districts

表2 气象因子与NDVI的Pearson相关系数

Table 2 Pearson correlation coefficient of meteorological factors and NDVI

气象因子 Meteorological factors	上游山地区 Upstream mountainous area		中游丘陵区 Midstream hilly area
气象因子 Meteorological factors	生长季 Growing season	非生长季 Non-growing season	生长季 Growing season	非生长季 Non-growing season
降水量 Precipitation	0.245	0.026	0.526*	0.293
气温 Temperature	0.075	0.202	0.014	0.348

参考文献 30

[1]	BAI Y, 2021. Analysis of vegetation dynamics in the Qinling-Daba Mountains region from MODIS time series data[J]. Ecological Indicators, 129(8): 108029. DOI URL
[2]	CHEN C, PARK T, WANG X H, et al., 2019. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2(2): 122-129. DOI URL
[3]	DIDAN K, 2015. MOD13Q1 MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 250m SIN Grid V006 [Dataset]. NASA EOSDIS LP DAAC. DOI: 10.5067/MODIS/MOD13Q1.006. DOI
[4]	GAO H D, WU Z, JIA L L, et al., 2019. Vegetation change and its influence on runoff and sediment in different landform units, Wei River, China[J]. Ecological Engineering, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105609. DOI
[5]	HENSEL D, FRANS L, 2006. Regional Kendall test for trend[J]. Environmental science and technology, 40(13): 4066-4073. DOI URL
[6]	HUANG X L, ZHANG T B, YI G H, et al., 2019. Dynamic changes of NDVI in the growing season of the Tibeban Plateau during the past 17 year of the climate change[J]. International Journal of Environment Research and Public Health, 16(18): 1-21. DOI URL
[7]	LI P, WANG J, LIU M M, et al., 2021. Spatio-temporal variation characteristics of NDVI and its response to climate on the Loess Plateau from 1985 to 2015 [J]. Catena, DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105331. DOI
[8]	LIU J Y, KUANG W H, ZHANG Z X, et al., 2014. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns, and causes of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24(2): 195-210. DOI URL
[9]	SEN P K, 1968. Estimates of regression coefficient based on Kendall's tau[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63(324): 1379-1389. DOI URL
[10]	SUN J Y, WANG X H, CHEN A P, et al., 2011. NDVI indicated characteristics of vegetation cover change in China's metropolises over the last three decades[J]. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 179(1-4): 1-14.
[11]	WANG S, FU B J, PIAO S L, et al., 2016. Reduced sediment transport in the Yellow River due to anthropogenic changes[J]. Nature Geoscience, 9(1): 38-41. DOI URL
[12]	XIAO J L, ZENG F, HE Q L, et al., 2021. Responses of forest carbon cycle to drought and elevated CO₂[J]. Atmosphere, 12(2): 212. DOI URL
[13]	XU G C, ZHANG J X, LI P, et al., 2018. Vegetation restoration projects and their influence on runoff and sediment in China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 95(1): 233-241. DOI URL
[14]	白红英, 2014. 秦巴山区森林植被对环境变化的响应[M]. 北京: 科学出版社: 50-62.
	BAI H Y, 2014. The response of forest vegetation to environmental changes in Qinba Mountains[M]. Beijing: Science Press: 50-62.
[15]	邓晨晖, 白红英, 高山, 等, 2018. 秦岭植被覆盖时空变化及其对气候变化与人类活动的双重响应[J]. 自然资源学报, 33(3): 425-438.
	DENG C H, BAI H Y, GAO S, et al., 2018. Spatial-temporal variation of the vegetation coverage in Qinling Mountains and its dual response to climate change and human activities[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 33(3): 425-438.
[16]	冯源, 肖文发, 朱建华, 等, 2020. 造林对区域森林生态系统碳储量和固碳速率的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 36(3): 281-290.
	FENG Y, XIAO W F, ZHU J H, et al., 2020. Impacts of afforestation on the carbon stocks and carbon sequestration rates of regional forest ecosystems[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 36(3): 281-290.
[17]	高海东, 吴曌, 2021. 黄河头道拐-潼关区间植被恢复及其对水沙过程影响[J]. 地理学报, 76(5): 1206-1217. DOI
	GAO H D, WU Z, 2021. Vegetation restoration and its effect on runoff and sediment processes in the Toudaoguai-Tongguan section of the Yellow River[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 76(5): 1206-1217.
[18]	郭铌, 朱燕君, 王介民, 等, 2008. 近22年来西北不同类型植被NDVI变化与气候因子的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 32(2): 319-327. DOI
	GUO N, ZHU Y J, WANG J M, et al., 2008. The relationship between NDVI and climate elements for 22 years in different vegetation areas of northwest China[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 32(2): 319-327.
[19]	李程, 庄大方, 何剑锋, 等, 2021. 东西伯利亚苔原-泰加林过渡带植被遥感物候时空特征及其对气温变化的响应[J]. 地理学报, 76(7): 1634-1648. DOI
	LI C, ZHUANG D F, HE J F, et al., 2021. Spatiotemporal variations in remote sensing phenology of vegetation and its responses to temperature change of boreal forest in tundra-taiga transitional zone in the Eastern Siberia[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 76(7): 1634-1648.
[20]	李登科, 王钊, 2020. 基于MCD12Q2的秦岭植被物候时空变化及对气候的响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 29(1): 11-22.
	LI D K, WANG Z, 2020. Spatiotemporal variation of vegetation phenology and its response to climate in Qinling Mountains based on MCD12Q2[J]. Ecology and Environment Sciences, 29(1): 11-22.
[21]	刘宪锋, 潘耀忠, 朱秀芳, 等, 2015. 2000-2014年秦巴山区植被覆盖时空变化特征及其归因[J]. 地理学报, 70(5): 705-716. DOI
	LIU X F, PAN Y Z, ZHU X F, et al., 2015. Spatiotemporal variation of vegetation coverage in Qinling-Daba Mountains in relation to environmental factors[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(5): 705-716.
[22]	马新萍, 白红英, 侯钦磊, 等, 2012. 1959年至2010年秦岭灞河流域径流量变化及其影响因素分析[J]. 资源科学, 34(7): 1298-1305.
	MA X P, BAI H Y, HOU Q L, et al., 2012. Runoff change of bahe river basin in Qinling Mountains and its influencing factors[J]. Resource Science, 34(7): 1298-1305.
[23]	莫申国, 2008. GIS支持下的秦岭植被景观梯度分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 21(2): 105-108.
	MO S G, 2008. Vegetation landscape gradient analysis based on GIS in Qinling Mountains[J]. Research of Environmental Science, 21(2): 105-108.
[24]	倪铭, 张曦月, 姜超, 等, 2021. 中国西南部地区植被对极端气候事件的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 45(6): 626-640.
	NI M, ZHANG X Y, JIANG C, et al., 2021. Responses of vegetation to extreme climate events in southwestern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 45(6): 626-640. DOI URL
[25]	齐贵增, 白红英, 赵婷, 等, 2021. 秦岭陕西段南北坡植被对干湿变化响应敏感性及空间差异[J]. 地理学报, 76(1): 44-56. DOI
	QI G Z, BAI H Y, ZHAO T, et al., 2021. Sensitivity and areal differentiation of vegetation responses to hydrothermal dynamics on the southern and northern slopes of the Qinling Mountains in Shaanxi province[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 76(1): 44-56.
[26]	孙华, 白红英, 张清雨, 等, 2009. 秦岭南北地区植被覆盖对区域环境变化的响应[J]. 环境科学学报, 29(12): 2635-2641.
	SUN H, BAI H Y, ZHANG Q Y, et al., 2009. Responses of vegetation coverage to regional environmental change in the northern and southern Qinling Mountains[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 29(12): 2635-2641.
[27]	王治国, 白永平, 车磊, 等, 2020. 关中平原城市群植被覆盖的时空特征与影响因素[J]. 干旱区地理, 43(4): 1041-1050.
	WANG Z G, BAI Y P, CHE L, et al., 2020. Spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of vegetation coverage in urban agglomeration of Guanzhong Plain[J]. Arid Land Geography, 43(4): 1041-1050.
[28]	许智超, 张岩, 刘宪春, 等, 2011. 半干旱黄土区退耕还林十年植被恢复变化分析--以陕西吴起县为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 20(1): 91-96.
	XU Z C, ZHANG Y, LIU X C, et al., 2011. Vegetation restoration since the project of returning cropland to forest in the semiarid Loess Plateau: A case study of Wuqi county, Shaanxi province[J]. Ecology and Environment, 20(1): 91-96.
[29]	赵炯昌, 潘岱立, 卫伟, 等, 2021. 植被格局对土壤入渗和水沙过程影响的模拟试验研究[J]. 生态学报, 41(4): 1373-1380.
	ZHAO J C, PAN D L, WEI W, et al., 2021. Simulation experiment on the influence of vegetation pattern on soil infiltration and water and sediment process[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(4): 1373-1380.
[30]	朱国平, 王秀茹, 王敏, 等, 2006. 城市河流的近自然综合治理研究进展[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 4(1): 92-97.
	ZHU G P, WANG X R, WANG M, et al., 2006. Advances on near natural comprehensive control of urban river[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 4(1): 92-97.

2000年以来浐灞河流域不同地貌区植被变化特征及影响因素研究

Study on Vegetation Variation Characteristics and Influencing Factors in Different Geomorphic Zones in the Chanbahe River Basin since 2000

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	巫晨煜, 许帆帆, 魏士博, 樊晶晶, 刘观鹏, 王坤. 渭河流域地表植被覆盖对气候变化的响应研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(5): 835-844.
[2]	王超, 杨倩楠, 张池, 刘同旭, 张晓龙, 陈静, 刘科学. 丹霞山不同土地利用方式土壤磷组分特征及其有效性[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(5): 889-897.
[3]	李晖, 李必龙, 葛黎黎, 韩琛惠, 杨倩, 张岳军. 2000-2021年汾河流域植被时空演变特征及地形效应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(3): 439-449.
[4]	贾志峰, 刘鹏程, 刘宇, 吴博博, 陈丹姿, 张向飞. 气候变化和人类活动对松辽流域植被覆盖的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(1): 1-10.
[5]	阮惠华, 许剑辉, 张菲菲. 2001—2020年粤港澳大湾区植被和地表温度时空变化研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(8): 1510-1520.
[6]	陈文裕, 夏丽华, 徐国良, 余世钦, 陈行, 陈金凤. 2000—2020年珠江流域NDVI动态变化及影响因素研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(7): 1306-1316.
[7]	李梦华, 韩颖娟, 赵慧, 王云霞. 基于地理探测器的宁夏植被覆盖度时空变化特征及其驱动因子分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(7): 1317-1325.
[8]	孙梦鑫, 张岳, 辛宇, 钟鼎杰, 杨存建. 川西高原近20 a植被物候变化及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(7): 1326-1339.
[9]	刘祥宏, 尹勤瑞, 辛建宝, 刘伟, 许秀泉, 黄占斌, 安如意. 生态植被自然修复及其人工促进技术研究进展与展望[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(7): 1476-1488.
[10]	曹晓云, 祝存兄, 陈国茜, 孙树娇, 赵慧芳, 朱文彬, 周秉荣. 2000—2021年柴达木盆地地表绿度变化及地形分异研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(6): 1080-1090.
[11]	王超, 杨倩楠, 张池, 李祥东, 陈静, 张晓龙, 陈金洁, 刘科学. 东南湿润区典型丹霞地貌土壤有机碳组分及其敏感性研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(6): 1132-1140.
[12]	陈金凤, 余世钦, 符加方, 徐国良, 于波, 赖晓群, 胡思源, 张开渠, 刘家华. 华南红层地貌区不同利用方式土壤质量特征及其影响因素——以南雄盆地为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(5): 918-930.
[13]	高思琦, 董国涛, 蒋晓辉, 聂桐, 郭欣伟, 党素珍, 李心宇, 李昊洋. 黄河源植被覆盖度变化及空间分布自然驱动力分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(3): 429-439.
[14]	余玉洋, 宋丰艺, 张世杰. 2000—2020年河南省NDVI时空变化及其驱动因素定量分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(10): 1939-1950.
[15]	聂桐, 董国涛, 蒋晓辉, 郭欣伟, 党素珍, 郑嘉昊, 李立缠, 王江. 榆林地区植被时空分异特征及其影响因素研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(1): 26-36.