Comparative Study on the Release of Beneficial Volatile Organic Compounds from Four Deciduous Tree Species

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.01.013

Ecology and Environment ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 123-128.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.01.013

• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparative Study on the Release of Beneficial Volatile Organic Compounds from Four Deciduous Tree Species

LI Shaoning¹^,²(), LI Tingting¹^,², TAO Xueying¹^,², ZHAO Na¹, XU Xiaotian¹, LU Shaowei¹^,²^,^*()

1. Yanshan Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Institute of Beijing of Forestry and Pomology, Beijing Academy of Agricultureand Forestry Sciences, Beijing, 100093, P. R. China
2. Shenyang Agricultural University, Liaoning, Shenyang 110866, P. R. China

Received:2022-10-20 Online:2023-01-18 Published:2023-04-06
Contact: LU Shaowei

4种落叶树种释放有益挥发性有机物的比较研究

李少宁¹^,²(), 李婷婷¹^,², 陶雪莹¹^,², 赵娜¹, 徐晓天¹, 鲁绍伟¹^,²^,^*()

1.北京市农林科学研究院林业果树研究所，北京燕山森林生态系统长期定位观测研究站，北京 100093
2.沈阳农业大学，辽宁沈阳 110866

通讯作者: 鲁绍伟
作者简介:李少宁（1975年生），男，副研究员，博士，主要从事森林生态方向研究。E-mail: Lishaoning@126.com
基金资助:
北京市农林科学院科技创新能力建设资助项目(KJCX20200207);北京市农林科学院科技创新能力建设资助项目(KJCX20200602);北京市农林科学院科技创新能力建设资助项目(KJCX20200801);国家自然科学基金项目(32171844);国家自然科学基金项目(32171537)

Abstract

Abstract:

To examine the difference of beneficial biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) released by different tree species and the seasonal diurnal variation characteristics of weeping willow, the aim of this study is to screen out the garden greening tree species with high health value, beneficial for the environment and human body. Four deciduous tree species in Beijing typical forest ecosystem, Salix babylonica, Sophora japonica, Ginkgo biloba and Koelreuteria paniculata, were selected as the research objects. Dynamic headspace bagging technology and automatic thermal desorption - gas chromatography/mass spectrometry were used to compare and analyze the difference of beneficial BVOCs released from leaves of different plants, and screen the tree species with health benefits. Meanwhile, the diurnal dynamic characteristics of BVOCs released by weeping willow in different growing seasons were studied. The results showed that (1) the beneficial BVOCs released by the four decident tree species contained six common beneficial components: 1R)-(+) -α-pinene, leaf acetate, cis-3-hexene-1-ol, L-menthol, natural nonaldehyde and chamomile blue. Ginkgo and koelreuteria mainly released alcohols (17.23%, 14.08%) and esters (13.43%, 9.49%). Weeping willow mainly released aldehydes (13.57%). Locust mainly released olefin compounds (15.75%). (2) The total amount of beneficial BVOCs released by four species was 50.90% for Ginkgo, 38.81% for koelia, 32.11% for drooping willow and 29.24% for Robinia pseudoacacia. (3) Weeping willow mainly released olefin compounds in spring, aldehydes in summer, and alcohols in autumn. (4) The beneficial BVOCs emitted by weeping willow in different growing seasons had obvious diurnal differences, and the daily release showed a unimodal curve distribution, and the highest value of daily release mostly appeared around noon when the light was most intense. In this study, the four deciduous tree species released relatively high contents of alcohols, esters and aldehydes, and could be planted in a suitable season according to the efficacy of each compound category. Secondly, in the construction of garden road greening, forest health, priority can be given to ginkgo, koelreuteria, weeping willow, and locust in turn; midday is the best time for people to do outdoor activities, when forest tree species can more efficiently release beneficial volatile organic compounds.

Key words: deciduous tree species, beneficial volatile organic matter, weeping willow, daily variation, seasonal changes

摘要：

研究不同树种之间释放有益挥发性有机物（BVOCs）成分差异和垂柳季节性日变化特征，旨在筛选出康养价值高，对环境有益、人体有利的园林绿化树种。以北京市典型森林生态系统中的4种落叶树种——垂柳（Salix babylonica）、国槐（Sophora japonica）、银杏（Ginkgo biloba）和栾树（Koelreuteria paniculata）为研究对象，采用动态顶空套袋技术与自动热脱附-气相色谱/质谱联用法，对比分析不同植物叶片释放有益BVOCs成分的差异，筛选具有康体保健功效的树种。同时，研究垂柳在不同生长季节释放BVOCs的日动态变化特征。结果表明，（1）4种落叶树种释放的有益BVOCs含有6种共同有益成分：(1R)-(+)-α-蒎烯、乙酸叶醇酯、顺-3-己烯-1-醇、左薄荷脑、天然壬醛和甘菊蓝。银杏和栾树主要释放醇类（17.23%、14.08%）、酯类化合物（13.43%、9.49%）；垂柳主要释放醛类化合物（13.57%）；国槐则主要释放烯烃类化合物（15.75%）。（2）4种树种有益BVOCs释放总量分别表现为银杏50.90%、栾树38.81%、垂柳32.11%、国槐29.24%。（3）垂柳在春季主要释放烯烃类化合物，而在夏季，醛类化合物排放量较高，秋季则主要释放醇类化合物。（4）垂柳在不同生长季排放的有益BVOCs具有明显日差异，日释放量均呈单峰曲线分布，日释放高值多出现于光照最为强烈的正午前后。该研究4种落叶树种释放的醇类、酯类和醛类化合物相对含量较高，可根据各化合物类别功效适地适季栽种；其次在园林道路绿化、森林康养等建设中可优先考虑银杏树。午时左右森林树种能够更加高效地释放有益挥发性有机物，此时段是人们进行户外活动的最佳时间，能够更高效地吸收森林树种发挥的生态康养价值。

关键词: 落叶树种, 有益挥发性有机物, 垂柳, 日变化, 季节变化

CLC Number:

LI Shaoning, LI Tingting, TAO Xueying, ZHAO Na, XU Xiaotian, LU Shaowei. Comparative Study on the Release of Beneficial Volatile Organic Compounds from Four Deciduous Tree Species[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(1): 123-128.

李少宁, 李婷婷, 陶雪莹, 赵娜, 徐晓天, 鲁绍伟. 4种落叶树种释放有益挥发性有机物的比较研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(1): 123-128.

Figures/Tables 4

References 30

[1]	FINESHI S, LORETO F, 2012. Leaf volatile isoprenoids: An important defensive armament in forest tree species[J]. Iforest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 5(1): 13-17. DOI URL
[2]	GUIDOLOTTI G, PALLOZZI E, GAVRICHKOVA O, et al., 2019. Emission of constitutive isoprene, induced monoterpenes, and other volatiles under high temperatures in Eucalyptus camaldulensis: A 13C labelling study[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 15(3): 176-184. DOI URL
[3]	GUENTHER A B, ZIMMERMAN P R, HAELRY P C, et al., 1993. Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: model evaluations and sensitivity analyses[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 98(D7): 12609-12617. DOI URL
[4]	PEÑUELAS J, LLUSIÀ J, 2003. BVOCs: Plant defense against climate warming[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 8(3): 105-109. DOI URL
[5]	BONN B, MOORTGAT G K, 2003. Sesquiterpene ozonolysis: Origin of atmospheric new particle formation from biogenic hydrocarbons[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 30(11): 1585. DOI URL
[6]	CALFAPIETRA C, FARES S, MANES F, et al., 2013. Role of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOC) emitted by urban trees on ozone concentration in cities: A review[J]. Environmental Pollution, 183: 71-80. DOI PMID
[7]	HANSEN J S, NORGAARD A W, KOPONEN I K, et al., 2016, Limonene and its ozone-initiated reaction products attenuate allergic lung inflammation in mice[J]. Journal of immunotoxicology, 13(6):793-803. DOI URL
[8]	HOLOPAINEN J K, BLANDE J D, 2012. Molecular plant volatile communication[J]. Sensing in Nature, 739: 17-31.
[9]	SINDELAROVA K, GRANIER C, BOUARA I, et al., 2014. Global data set of biogenic VOC emissions calculated by the MEGAN model over the last 30 years[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry Physics. 14(17): 9317-9341. DOI URL
[10]	BENNETT R N, WALLSGROVE R M, 2010. Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms[J]. New Phytol, 127(4): 617-633. DOI URL
[11]	TURLINGS T C J, ERB M, 2018. Tritrophic interactions mediated by herbivore-induced plant volatiles: Mechanisms, ecological relevance, and application potential[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 63(1): 433-452. DOI URL
[12]	高岩, 2005. 北京市绿化树木挥发性有机物释放动态及其对人体健康的影响[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学.
	GAO Y, 2005. Emission dynamics of volatile organic compounds from green trees in Beijing and its impact on human health[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University.
[13]	高媛, 2019. 5种园林绿化树种BVOCs排放动态及其影响因素研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学.
	GAO Y, 2019. Study on BVOCs emission dynamics and influencing factors of five landscaping trees[D]. Yangling: Northwest Agricultural and Forestry University.
[14]	高宇, 孙晓玲, 金珊, 2012. 绿叶挥发物及其生态功能研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2(4): 11-23.
	GAO Y, SUN X L, JIN S, et al., 2012. Advances in green leaf volatiles and its ecological functions[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2(4): 11-23. DOI
[15]	胡春芳, 袁相洋, 田媛, 等, 2018. 常见花卉植物释放挥发性有机化合物的研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 37(2): 588-595.
	HU C F, YUAN X Y, TIAN Y, et al., 2018. A review on biogenic volatile organic compounds emitted from common flower plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 37(2): 588-595.
[16]	姜梦丽, 2015. 芳冰鼻吸剂的制备及其对大鼠心脑关联性的研究[D]. 福州: 福建中医药大学.
	JIANG M L, 2015. Preparation of fangbing nasal inhalation and its correlation with heart and brain in rats[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
[17]	姜圆圆, 2018. L-薄荷醇衍生物的合成及其抗抑郁, 抗惊厥, 催眠活性研究[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学.
	JIANG Y Y, 2018. Synthesis of L-menthol derivatives and their antidepressant, anticonvulsant and hypnotic activities[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University.
[18]	李海梅, 何兴元, 王奎玲, 2007. 沈阳城区五种乔木树种的光合特性[J]. 应用生态学报, 18(8): 1709-1714.
	LI H M, HE X Y, WANG K L, 2007. Photosynthetic characteristics of five tree species in Shenyang urban area[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 18(8): 1709-1714.
[19]	李洪远, 王芳, 熊善高, 等, 2015. 植物挥发性有机物的作用与释放影响因素研究进展[J]. 安全与环境学报, 15(2): 292-296.
	LI H Y, WANG F, XIONG S G, et al., 2015. Research review on the role and the influential factors of the biogenic volatile organic compounds[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 15(2): 292-296.
[20]	李平, 贾红婕, 靳毓, 等, 2016. 核桃分心木水提液易挥发性成分分析[J]. 食品科学, 37(16): 142-148. DOI
	LI P, JIA H J, JIN Y, et al., 2016. Analysis of volatile components in the water extract of Walnut Centrifex[J]. Food Science, 37(16): 142-148.
[21]	李树炎, 徐晓燕, 王林, 等, 2020. 茶树鲜叶和鲜花精油成分及清除DPPH自由基能力的比较[J]. 江苏农业科学, 48(6): 184-188.
	LI S Y, XU X Y, WANG L, et al., 2020. Comparison of essential oils from fresh leaves and flowers of tea trees and their ability to scavenge DPPH free radicals[J] Jiangsu Agricultural Science, 48(6): 184-188.
[22]	马卫华, 李磊, 武文卿, 等, 2018. 红富士苹果花挥发性成分分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 34(15): 60-65. DOI
	MA W H, LI L, WU W Q, et al., 2018. Analysis of volatile components in red Fuji apple flowers[J]. China Agricultural Bulletin, 34(15): 60-65.
[23]	彭秋桐, 2020. 常见水生植物释放的挥发性有机物 (BVOCs) 种类初步研究[D]. 武汉: 湖北大学.
	PENG Q T, 2020. Preliminary study on the types of volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) released by common aquatic plants[D]. Wuhan: Hubei University.
[24]	王凌健, 方欣, 杨长青, 等, 2013. 植物萜类次生代谢及其调控[J]. 中国科学: 生命科学, 43(12): 1030-1046.
	WANG L J, FANG X, YANG C Q, et al., 2013. Secondary metabolism and regulation of plant mites[J]. China Science Life Science. 43(12): 1030-1046.
[25]	王君怡, 2022. 北京地区8种典型景观树种释放挥发性有机物 (BVOCs) 动态变化特征研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学.
	WANG J Y, 2002. Study on the dynamic change characteristics of volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) released by eight typical landscape trees in Beijing[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University.
[26]	夏琪涵, 2019. 植物VOCs有益成分的分子康养作用机理研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学.
	XIA Q H, 2019. Study on the molecular health mechanism of beneficial components of plant VOCs[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University.
[27]	谢小洋, 2016. 西安市主要绿化树种VOCs组成及释放规律研究[D]. 陕西: 西北农林科技大学.
	XIE X X, 2016. Study on VOCs composition and release law of main greening trees in Xi’an[D]. Shanxi: Northwest Agricultural and Forestry University.
[28]	袁卿语, 2022. 园林植物释放挥发性有机物动态变化特征及其效应研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学.
	YUAN Q Y, 2022. Study on dynamic change characteristics and effects of volatile organic compounds released by landscape plants[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University.
[29]	赵学丽, 舒钰, 王丹, 2019. 红松松针挥发油氨基酸组分及化合物成分[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 47(6): 40-44.
	ZHAO X L, SHU Y, WANG D, 2019. Amino acid composition and compound composition of volatile oil from Korean pine needles[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 47(6): 40-44.
[30]	周琦, 王金凤, 徐永勤, 等, 2020. 樟树叶片挥发性有机物释放季节和日动态变化规律[J]. 广西植物, 40(7): 1021-1032.
	ZHOU Q, WANG J F, XU Y Q, et al., 2020. Seasonal and diurnal change laws of volatile organic compounds from leaves of Cinnamomum camphora[J]. Guihaia, 40(7): 1021-1032.

化合物类别	序号	化合物	分子式	相对含量/%
化合物类别	序号	化合物	分子式	垂柳 Salix babylonica	国槐 Sophora japonica	银杏 Ginkgo biloba	栾树 Koelreuteria paniculata
烯烃类	1	(1R)-(+)-α-蒎烯 (1R)-(+)-Alpha-Pinene	C₁₀H₁₆	0.53±0.13	9.50±2.14	0.97±0.02	1.34±0.83
	2	(s)-(-)-柠檬烯 (-)-Limonene	C₁₀H₁₆	—	—	5.20±0.53	—
	3	桧烯 Sabinene	C₁₀H₁₆	—	1.17±0.05	2.46±0.55	2.27±0.39
	4	萜品油烯 Terpinolene	C₁₀H₁₆	—	3.64±1.04	1.39±0.04	0.42±0.01
	5	月桂烯 Myrcene	C₁₀H₁₆	1.30±0.19	0.73±0.11	—	1.06±0.26
	6	松油烯 P-mentha-1, 3-diene	C₁₀H₁₆	－	0.71±0.02	—	—
	7	α-蒎烯 α-Pinene	C₁₀H₁₆	0.37±0.04	—	—	—
酯类	8	乙酸叶醇酯 (Z)-3-Hexenyl acetate	C₈H₁₄O₂	9.95±3.06	3.19±0.67	13.43±2.14	9.49±1.68
醛类	9	癸醛 Decanal	C₁₀H₂₀O	2.32±0.48	—	1.84±0.38	3.09±0.90
	10	己醛 Hexana	C₆H₁₂O	6.72±1.33	—	4.40±0.05	—
	11	天然壬醛 Nonyl aldehyde	C₉H₁₈O	4.53±0.05	4.40±0.92	2.43±0.35	5.09±0.55
酮类	12	甲基庚烯酮 6-Methyl-5-Hepten-2-one	C₈H₁₄O	—	0.65±0.04	0.82±0.24	0.88±0.08
酮类	13	异佛尔酮 (z)-P-menthan-3-on	C₉H₁₄O	0.89±0.03	—	0.32±0.01	—
醇类	14	顺-3-己烯-1-醇 Cis-3-Hexen-1-ol	C₆H₁₂O	2.52±0.86	3.77±0.42	16.83±3.31	13.32±2.81
醇类	15	左薄荷脑 L(-)-Menthol	C₁₀H₂₀O	1.62±0.17	0.24±0.06	0.40±0.03	0.76±0.02
其他类	16	甘菊蓝 Azulene	C₁₀H₈	1.36±0.36	0.40±0.05	0.21±0.02	0.57±0.26
其他类	17	左旋樟脑 (-)-Alcanfor	C₁₀H₁₆O	—	0.84±0.02	0.20±0.01	0.52±0.01

化合物类别	序号	化合物	分子式	相对含量/%
化合物类别	序号	化合物	分子式	垂柳 Salix babylonica	国槐 Sophora japonica	银杏 Ginkgo biloba	栾树 Koelreuteria paniculata
烯烃类	1	(1R)-(+)-α-蒎烯 (1R)-(+)-Alpha-Pinene	C₁₀H₁₆	0.53±0.13	9.50±2.14	0.97±0.02	1.34±0.83
	2	(s)-(-)-柠檬烯 (-)-Limonene	C₁₀H₁₆	—	—	5.20±0.53	—
	3	桧烯 Sabinene	C₁₀H₁₆	—	1.17±0.05	2.46±0.55	2.27±0.39
	4	萜品油烯 Terpinolene	C₁₀H₁₆	—	3.64±1.04	1.39±0.04	0.42±0.01
	5	月桂烯 Myrcene	C₁₀H₁₆	1.30±0.19	0.73±0.11	—	1.06±0.26
	6	松油烯 P-mentha-1, 3-diene	C₁₀H₁₆	－	0.71±0.02	—	—
	7	α-蒎烯 α-Pinene	C₁₀H₁₆	0.37±0.04	—	—	—
酯类	8	乙酸叶醇酯 (Z)-3-Hexenyl acetate	C₈H₁₄O₂	9.95±3.06	3.19±0.67	13.43±2.14	9.49±1.68
醛类	9	癸醛 Decanal	C₁₀H₂₀O	2.32±0.48	—	1.84±0.38	3.09±0.90
	10	己醛 Hexana	C₆H₁₂O	6.72±1.33	—	4.40±0.05	—
	11	天然壬醛 Nonyl aldehyde	C₉H₁₈O	4.53±0.05	4.40±0.92	2.43±0.35	5.09±0.55
酮类	12	甲基庚烯酮 6-Methyl-5-Hepten-2-one	C₈H₁₄O	—	0.65±0.04	0.82±0.24	0.88±0.08
酮类	13	异佛尔酮 (z)-P-menthan-3-on	C₉H₁₄O	0.89±0.03	—	0.32±0.01	—
醇类	14	顺-3-己烯-1-醇 Cis-3-Hexen-1-ol	C₆H₁₂O	2.52±0.86	3.77±0.42	16.83±3.31	13.32±2.81
醇类	15	左薄荷脑 L(-)-Menthol	C₁₀H₂₀O	1.62±0.17	0.24±0.06	0.40±0.03	0.76±0.02
其他类	16	甘菊蓝 Azulene	C₁₀H₈	1.36±0.36	0.40±0.05	0.21±0.02	0.57±0.26
其他类	17	左旋樟脑 (-)-Alcanfor	C₁₀H₁₆O	—	0.84±0.02	0.20±0.01	0.52±0.01

Comparative Study on the Release of Beneficial Volatile Organic Compounds from Four Deciduous Tree Species

4种落叶树种释放有益挥发性有机物的比较研究

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 30

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	DONG Jiefang, DENG Chun, ZHANG Zhongwu. Spatio-temporal Evolution and Population Exposure Risk to PM_2.5 in the Weihe River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(6): 1078-1088.
[2]	ZHENG Qingzhou, HE Jun, LI Shenzhi, DENG Chengzhi, WU Zhipeng, HUANG Xiaolin, WU Xia. Analysis on the Differences and Influencing Factors of Human Comfort between Urban and Rural Areas in Chongqing [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(6): 1089-1097.
[3]	WANG Jiayi, SUN Tingting, SHA Runyu, CHEN Tinghong, XING Ran, QIN Boqiang, SHI Wenqing. Study on the Synergic Effect of Algae Salvage on Pollution Control and Carbon Emission Reduction in Eutrophic Lakes [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(6): 1108-1114.
[4]	XU Xiaoyun, RAO Zhihan, JIANG Hongbin, ZHANG Wei, CHEN Chao, YANG Yongan, HU Yanli, WEI Haichuan. Pollution Characteristics and Formation Potential for O₃ and SOA of Ambient VOCs in Suining Industrial Zone in Summer [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 956-968.
[5]	ZHANG Junwei, XIA Shengjie, CHEN Huiru, LIU Yanhong. Influence of Landscape Pattern Evolution on Thermal Environment of Urban Agglomerations in Central Shanxi Province [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 943-955.
[6]	YANG Kai, YANG Jingrui, CAO Peipei, LÜ Chunhua, SUN Wenjuan, YU Lingfei, DENG Xi. Dynamic Response of Rice Plant Height, Tillering and SPAD under Elevated CO₂ Concentration and Their Simulation [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 933-942.
[7]	GE Yuankai, ZHAO Longlong, CHEN Jinsong, REN Yanni, LI Hongzhong. Spatio-temporal Evolution Trend of Meteorological Drought and Identification of Drought Events in Southwest China from 1983 to 2020 [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 920-932.
[8]	HAO Lei, ZHAI Yongguang, QI Wenchao, LAN Qiongqiong. Spatial-temporal Dynamics of Vegetation Carbon Sources/sinks in Inner Mongolia from 2001 to 2020 and Its Response to Climate Change [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 825-834.
[9]	LI Jianhui, DANG Zheng, CHEN Lin. Spatial-temporal Characteristics of PM_2.5 and Its Influencing Factors in the Yellow River Jiziwan Metropolitan Area [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(4): 697-705.
[10]	LIU Ziwei, GE Jiwen, WANG Yuehuan, YANG Shiyu, YAO Dong, XIE Jinlin. Variation Pattern and Influential Factors of Methane Flux in the Dajiuhu Peatland [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(4): 706-714.
[11]	WANG Jiali, FENG Jingke, YANG Yuanzheng, ZU Jiaxing, CAI Wenhua, YANG Jian. Research on Spatial Relations between Impervious Surfaces and the Urban Thermal Environment in the Central Metropolitan Area of Nanning City [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 525-534.
[12]	ZHANG Huaicheng, HAN Hong, WANG Zaifeng, HAN Lizhao, LIU Ke, ZHANG Guiqin, FAN Jing, WEI Xiaofeng. Micromorphology Characteristics and Chemical Composition of Urban Dust in Ji'nan [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 545-555.
[13]	WEN Lirong, JIANG Ming, HUANG Bo, YUAN Luan, ZHOU Yan, LU Weimei, ZHANG Ying, LIU Ming, ZHANG Liyun. Analysis of Ozone Pollution Causes and Source Analysis of VOCs in Typical Areas of Pearl River Delta: A Case Study of Zhongshan City [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 500-513.
[14]	WU Yarui, WANG Meijing, WANG Tao, YANG Meihuan. Effect of COVID-19 on Temporal and Spatial Distribution of NO₂ Concentration and Socio-Economic Life: A Case Study of Shaanxi Province [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 514-524.
[15]	LI Yushi, XIA Zhiye, ZHANG Lei. Carbon Emission Prediction and Spatial Optimization of Land Use in Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle in 2030 Based on SSPs Multi-scenarios [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 535-544.