Ecology and Environment ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 1952-1960.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.10.002
Special Issue: 生物多样性专题汇编
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Xiaolong1,2(), ZHOU Jihua2, LAI Liming2, ZHENG Yuanrun2,*(
)
Received:
2021-05-20
Online:
2021-10-18
Published:
2021-12-21
Contact:
ZHENG Yuanrun
张晓龙1,2(), 周继华2, 来利明2, 郑元润2,*(
)
通讯作者:
郑元润
作者简介:
张晓龙(1988年生),男,博士,主要从事植物生态适应方面研究。E-mail: zhangxiaolong@sxufe.edu.cn
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHANG Xiaolong, ZHOU Jihua, LAI Liming, ZHENG Yuanrun. Variation Characteristics of Populus euphratica Community Diversity Along the Downstream Riverbanks of the Heihe River[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(10): 1952-1960.
张晓龙, 周继华, 来利明, 郑元润. 黑河下游胡杨群落多样性沿河岸距离的变化特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(10): 1952-1960.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.10.002
样地 Site | 沿河距离 Distance/ m | 海拔 Altitude/ m | 土壤含水量 Soil moisture/ % | 土壤容重 Soil bulk density/ (g∙cm-3) | 土壤电导率 Soil electrical conductivity/ (mS∙cm-1) | 群落属性 Community characteristics | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
优势种 Dominant species | 群落结构 Structure | 群落盖度 Coverage/% | 重要值 Importance value | ||||||
S1 | 50 | 916 | 5.73±0.76bc | 1.41±0.04c | 0.36±0.03d | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-灌-草Tree-shrub-herb | 30.33±2.40c | 0.83 |
S2 | 200 | 917 | 5.04±0.75bc | 1.50±0.03b | 0.59±0.09cd | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-灌-草Tree-shrub-herb | 34.00±4.58bc | 0.81 |
S3 | 350 | 914 | 4.42±0.70bc | 1.50±0.04b | 0.37±0.02d | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-灌-草Tree-shrub-herb | 40.33±2.60bc | 0.82 |
S4 | 500 | 914 | 18.51±1.73a | 1.41±0.02c | 2.56±0.53a | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-灌-草Tree-shrub-herb | 46.67±2.91b | 0.80 |
S5 | 650 | 913 | 19.27±1.56a | 1.37±0.03c | 0.40±0.10d | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-灌-草Tree-shrub-herb | 74.33±6.96a | 0.61 |
S6 | 800 | 913 | 15.23±2.50a | 1.38±0.02c | 1.02±0.19c | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-灌-草Tree-shrub-herb | 68.67±8.17a | 0.65 |
S7 | 950 | 912 | 7.78±0.93b | 1.40±0.05c | 0.50±0.04cd | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-草 Tree-herb | 45.00±3.61b | 0.87 |
S8 | 1100 | 916 | 3.06±0.39c | 1.58±0.03a | 0.66±0.13cd | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-草 Tree-herb | 40.33±1.76bc | 0.91 |
S9 | 1250 | 915 | 2.32±0.26c | 1.62±0.04a | 1.98±0.44b | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-草 Tree-herb | 34.33±2.33bc | 0.90 |
Table 1 Populus euphratica forest sampling sites in the downstream desert riparian zone of the Heihe River
样地 Site | 沿河距离 Distance/ m | 海拔 Altitude/ m | 土壤含水量 Soil moisture/ % | 土壤容重 Soil bulk density/ (g∙cm-3) | 土壤电导率 Soil electrical conductivity/ (mS∙cm-1) | 群落属性 Community characteristics | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
优势种 Dominant species | 群落结构 Structure | 群落盖度 Coverage/% | 重要值 Importance value | ||||||
S1 | 50 | 916 | 5.73±0.76bc | 1.41±0.04c | 0.36±0.03d | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-灌-草Tree-shrub-herb | 30.33±2.40c | 0.83 |
S2 | 200 | 917 | 5.04±0.75bc | 1.50±0.03b | 0.59±0.09cd | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-灌-草Tree-shrub-herb | 34.00±4.58bc | 0.81 |
S3 | 350 | 914 | 4.42±0.70bc | 1.50±0.04b | 0.37±0.02d | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-灌-草Tree-shrub-herb | 40.33±2.60bc | 0.82 |
S4 | 500 | 914 | 18.51±1.73a | 1.41±0.02c | 2.56±0.53a | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-灌-草Tree-shrub-herb | 46.67±2.91b | 0.80 |
S5 | 650 | 913 | 19.27±1.56a | 1.37±0.03c | 0.40±0.10d | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-灌-草Tree-shrub-herb | 74.33±6.96a | 0.61 |
S6 | 800 | 913 | 15.23±2.50a | 1.38±0.02c | 1.02±0.19c | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-灌-草Tree-shrub-herb | 68.67±8.17a | 0.65 |
S7 | 950 | 912 | 7.78±0.93b | 1.40±0.05c | 0.50±0.04cd | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-草 Tree-herb | 45.00±3.61b | 0.87 |
S8 | 1100 | 916 | 3.06±0.39c | 1.58±0.03a | 0.66±0.13cd | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-草 Tree-herb | 40.33±1.76bc | 0.91 |
S9 | 1250 | 915 | 2.32±0.26c | 1.62±0.04a | 1.98±0.44b | 胡杨 Populus euphratica | 乔-草 Tree-herb | 34.33±2.33bc | 0.90 |
分布区类型 Areal-types | 科 Family | 比例 Ratio/% | 属 Genera | 比例 Ratio/% | 所有分布物种 All distributed species |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
世界广布 Cosmopolitan | 豆科 Leguminosae, 藜科 Chenopodiaceae, 菊科 Compositae | 42.8 | 槐属 Sophora | 11.1 | 苦豆子 S. alopecuroides, 胡杨 P. euphratica, 多枝柽柳 T. ramosissima, 驼蹄瓣 Z. fabago, 莴苣 L. sativa, 骆驼蓬 P. harmala, 瓣鳞花 F. pulverulenta, 甘草 G. uralensis, 沙蓬 A. squarrosum |
泛热带分布及其变型 Pantropic | 蒺藜科 Zygophyllaceae | 14.3 | — | — | |
北温带分布 N. Temp. | 杨柳科 Salicaceae | 14.3 | 杨属 Populus | 11.1 | |
旧世界温带 Old World Temp. | 柽柳科 Tamaricaceae | 14.3 | 柽柳属 Tamarix, 莴苣属 Lactuca | 22.2 | |
地中海区、西亚至中亚分布 Mediterranea, W. Asia to C. Asia | 瓣鳞花科 Frankeniaceae | 14.3 | 驼蹄瓣属 Zygophyllum, 骆驼蓬属 Peganum, 瓣鳞花属 Frankenia, 甘草属 Glycyrrhiza | 44.5 | |
中亚分布 C. Asia | — | — | 沙蓬属 Agriophyllum | 11.1 | |
总计 | 7 | 100 | 9 | 100 | 9 |
Table 2 Types of families and genera of plants in the studied areas
分布区类型 Areal-types | 科 Family | 比例 Ratio/% | 属 Genera | 比例 Ratio/% | 所有分布物种 All distributed species |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
世界广布 Cosmopolitan | 豆科 Leguminosae, 藜科 Chenopodiaceae, 菊科 Compositae | 42.8 | 槐属 Sophora | 11.1 | 苦豆子 S. alopecuroides, 胡杨 P. euphratica, 多枝柽柳 T. ramosissima, 驼蹄瓣 Z. fabago, 莴苣 L. sativa, 骆驼蓬 P. harmala, 瓣鳞花 F. pulverulenta, 甘草 G. uralensis, 沙蓬 A. squarrosum |
泛热带分布及其变型 Pantropic | 蒺藜科 Zygophyllaceae | 14.3 | — | — | |
北温带分布 N. Temp. | 杨柳科 Salicaceae | 14.3 | 杨属 Populus | 11.1 | |
旧世界温带 Old World Temp. | 柽柳科 Tamaricaceae | 14.3 | 柽柳属 Tamarix, 莴苣属 Lactuca | 22.2 | |
地中海区、西亚至中亚分布 Mediterranea, W. Asia to C. Asia | 瓣鳞花科 Frankeniaceae | 14.3 | 驼蹄瓣属 Zygophyllum, 骆驼蓬属 Peganum, 瓣鳞花属 Frankenia, 甘草属 Glycyrrhiza | 44.5 | |
中亚分布 C. Asia | — | — | 沙蓬属 Agriophyllum | 11.1 | |
总计 | 7 | 100 | 9 | 100 | 9 |
群落特征 Community characteristics | 均值 Mean value | 标准误 SE | 最小值 Minimum | 最大值 Maximum | 自由度 Df | F值 F value | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
群落盖度 Community coverage | 46.00% | 3.11% | 25.00% | 87.00% | 8 | 12.00 | P<0.001 |
乔木层盖度 Tree layer coverage | 36.85% | 2.07% | 15.00% | 65.00% | 8 | 3.08 | P=0.023 |
灌木层盖度 Shrub layer coverage | 6.96% | 1.62% | 0.00 | 24.0% | 8 | 6.41 | P<0.001 |
草本层盖度 Herb layer coverage | 16.93% | 3.05% | 0.00 | 61.00% | 8 | 24.68 | P<0.001 |
Patrick指数 | 3.00 | 0.32 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 11.78 | P<0.001 |
Simpson指数 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.66 | 8 | 5.70 | P<0.001 |
Shannon-Wiener指数 | 0.62 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 1.31 | 8 | 7.05 | P<0.001 |
Pielou指数 | 0.53 | 0.03 | 0.23 | 0.81 | 8 | 2.19 | P=0.080 |
Table 3 Community coverage and diversity characteristics at different distances along the river
群落特征 Community characteristics | 均值 Mean value | 标准误 SE | 最小值 Minimum | 最大值 Maximum | 自由度 Df | F值 F value | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
群落盖度 Community coverage | 46.00% | 3.11% | 25.00% | 87.00% | 8 | 12.00 | P<0.001 |
乔木层盖度 Tree layer coverage | 36.85% | 2.07% | 15.00% | 65.00% | 8 | 3.08 | P=0.023 |
灌木层盖度 Shrub layer coverage | 6.96% | 1.62% | 0.00 | 24.0% | 8 | 6.41 | P<0.001 |
草本层盖度 Herb layer coverage | 16.93% | 3.05% | 0.00 | 61.00% | 8 | 24.68 | P<0.001 |
Patrick指数 | 3.00 | 0.32 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 11.78 | P<0.001 |
Simpson指数 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.66 | 8 | 5.70 | P<0.001 |
Shannon-Wiener指数 | 0.62 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 1.31 | 8 | 7.05 | P<0.001 |
Pielou指数 | 0.53 | 0.03 | 0.23 | 0.81 | 8 | 2.19 | P=0.080 |
土壤属性 Soil properties | 群落盖度 Community coverage | 乔木层盖度 Tree layer coverage | 灌木层盖度 Shrub layer coverage | 草本层盖度 Herb layer coverage | Patrick 指数 | Simpson 指数 | Shannon- Wiener指数 | Pielou 指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土壤含水量 Soil water content | 0.671** | 0.517** | 0.547** | 0.665** | 0.746** | 0.676** | 0.730** | 0.313ns |
土壤容重 Soil bulk density | -0.528** | -0.351ns | -0.507** | -0.564** | -0.635** | -0.613** | -0.643** | -0.300ns |
土壤电导率 Soil electrical conductivity | -0.019ns | 0.103ns | -0.209ns | -0.162ns | 0.084ns | -0.146ns | -0.088ns | -0.274ns |
Table 4 Pearson correlation coefficients between soil water-salt conditions and community characteristics
土壤属性 Soil properties | 群落盖度 Community coverage | 乔木层盖度 Tree layer coverage | 灌木层盖度 Shrub layer coverage | 草本层盖度 Herb layer coverage | Patrick 指数 | Simpson 指数 | Shannon- Wiener指数 | Pielou 指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土壤含水量 Soil water content | 0.671** | 0.517** | 0.547** | 0.665** | 0.746** | 0.676** | 0.730** | 0.313ns |
土壤容重 Soil bulk density | -0.528** | -0.351ns | -0.507** | -0.564** | -0.635** | -0.613** | -0.643** | -0.300ns |
土壤电导率 Soil electrical conductivity | -0.019ns | 0.103ns | -0.209ns | -0.162ns | 0.084ns | -0.146ns | -0.088ns | -0.274ns |
[1] |
DING J Y, ZHAO W W, DARYANTO S, et al., 2017. The spatial distribution and temporal variation of desert riparian forests and their influencing factors in the downstream Heihe River basin, China[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(5):2405-2419.
DOI URL |
[2] |
FU A H, CHEN Y N, LI W H, 2014. Water use strategies of the desert riparian forest plant community in the lower reaches of Heihe River Basin, China[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 57(6):1293-1305.
DOI URL |
[3] |
GASTON K J, 2000. Global patterns in biodiversity[J]. Nature, 405(6783):220-227.
DOI URL |
[4] | HAO X M, LI W H, HUANG X, et al., 2010. Assessment of the groundwater threshold of desert riparian forest vegetation along the middle and lower reaches of the Tarim River, China[J]. Hydrological Processes, 24(2):178-186. |
[5] |
LI W, YU T F, LI X Y, et al., 2016. Sap flow characteristics and their response to environmental variables in a desert riparian forest along lower Heihe River Basin, Northwest China[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5570-2.
DOI |
[6] |
MARTENS S N, BRESHEARS D D, MEYER C W, et al., 1997. Scales of above-ground and below-ground competition in a semi-arid woodland detected from spatial pattern[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 8(5):655-664.
DOI URL |
[7] |
MEYER K M, WARD D, WIEGAND K, et al., 2007. Multi-proxy evidence for competition between savanna woody species[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 10(1):63-72.
DOI URL |
[8] |
MI X C, FENG G, HU Y B, et al., 2021. The global significance of biodiversity science in China: An overview[J]. National Science Review, DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwab032/6147049.
DOI |
[9] |
RAHBEK C, BORREGAARD M K, COLWELL R K, et al., 2019. Humboldt's enigma: What causes global patterns of mountain biodiversity?[J]. Science, 365(6458):1108-1113.
DOI URL |
[10] |
TILMAN D, REICH P B, KNOPS J, 2006. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment[J]. Nature, 441(7093):629-632.
DOI URL |
[11] | WHITFORD W G, 2002. Ecology of Desert Ecosystems [M]. New York: Academic Press. |
[12] |
YU T F, FENG Q, SI J H, et al., 2013. Hydraulic redistribution of soil water by roots of two desert riparian phreatophytes in northwest China's extremely arid region[J]. Plant and Soil, 372:297-308.
DOI URL |
[13] |
ZENG Y, ZHAO C, KUNDZEWICZ Z W, et al., 2020. Distribution pattern of Tugai forests species diversity and their relationship to environmental factors in an arid area of China[J]. PLoS ONE, 15(5):e0232907.
DOI URL |
[14] | ZHENG T Y, WANG D, JI L T, et al., 2020. Classification, ordination and diversity pattern of typical forest communities in Taibai Mountain Nature Reserve[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(20):7353-7361. |
[15] |
ZHANG X L, GUAN T L, ZHOU J H, et al., 2018. Groundwater depth and soil properties are associated with variation in vegetation of a desert riparian ecosystem in an arid area of China[J]. Forests, 9(1):34.
DOI URL |
[16] | ZHU Y H, CHEN Y N, REN L L, et al., 2016. Ecosystem restoration and conservation in the arid inland river basins of Northwest China: Problems and strategies[J]. Ecology Engineering, 94:629-637. |
[17] | 白元, 徐海量, 张鹏, 等, 2012. 塔里木河下游荒漠植物群落物种多样性及其结构特征分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 28(5):486-492. |
BAI Y, XU H L, ZHANG P, et al., 2012. Species diversity and structural characters of desert plant communities in lower reaches of Tarim River[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 28(5):486-492. | |
[18] | 程国栋, 2009. 黑河流域水-生态-经济系统综合管理研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社. |
CHENG G D, 2009. Study on the integrated management of the water-ecology-economy system of Heihe River Basin [M]. Beijing: Science Press. | |
[19] |
方精云, 郭柯, 王国宏, 等, 2020. 《中国植被志》的植被分类系统、植被类型划分及编排体系[J]. 植物生态学报, 44(2):96-110.
DOI |
FANG J Y, GUO K, WANG G H, et al., 2020. Vegetation classification system and classification of vegetation types used for the compilation of vegetation of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 44(2):96-110. | |
[20] | 方精云, 王襄平, 沈泽昊, 等, 2009. 植物群落清查的主要内容、方法和技术规范[J]. 生物多样性, 17(6):533-548. |
FANG J Y, WANG X P, SHEN Z H, et al., 2009. Methods and protocols for plant community inventory[J]. Biodiversity Science, 17(6):533-548. | |
[21] | 冯起, 1998. 半湿润地区改良风沙土土壤性质研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 18(4):1-6. |
FENG Q, 1998. Properties of ameliorated sandy land soil on semi-humid area[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 18(4):1-6. | |
[22] | 韩路, 陈家力, 王家强, 等, 2019. 塔河源荒漠河岸林群落物种组成、结构与植物区系特征[J]. 植物科学学报, 37(3):324-336. |
HAN L, CHEN J L, WANG G Q, et al., 2019. Species composition, community structure, and floristic characteristics of desert riparian forest community along the mainstream of Tarim River[J]. Plant Science Journal, 37(3):324-336. | |
[23] | 李小雁, 郑元润, 王彦辉, 等, 2020. 黑河流域植被格局与生态水文适应机制[M]. 北京: 科学出版社. |
LI X Y, ZHENG Y R, WANG Y H, et al., 2021. Vegetation pattern and eco-hydrological adaptation mechanism in Heihe River Basin[M]. Beijing: Science Press. | |
[24] | 刘秉儒, 2021. 生物多样性的海拔分布格局研究及进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 30(2):438-444. |
LIU B R, 2021. Recent advances in altitudinal distribution patterns of biodiversity[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 30(2):438-444. | |
[25] | 刘蔚, 王涛, 苏永红, 等, 2005. 黑河下游土壤和地下水盐分特征分析[J]. 冰川冻土, 27(6):890-898. |
LIU W, WANG T, SU Y H, et al., 2005. Analysis of the characteristics of soil and groundwater salinity in the lower reaches of Heihe River[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 27(6):890-898. | |
[26] | 史浩伯, 孙桂丽, 王桂华, 等, 2020. 阿克苏河中游荒漠河岸林物种多样性与群落稳定性[J]. 水土保持通报 40(2):9-15. |
SHI H B, SUN G L, WANG G H, et al., 2020. Species diversity and community stability of desert riparian forests in middle reaches of Aksu River[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 40(2):9-15. | |
[27] | 吴征镒, 1991. 中国种子植物属的分布区类型[J]. 云南植物研究, 13(S4):1-139. |
WU Z Y, 1991. The areal-types of Chinese genera of seed plants[J]. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 13(S4):1-139. | |
[28] | 吴征镒, 周浙昆, 李德铢, 等, 2003. 世界种子植物科的分布区类型系统[J]. 云南植物研究, 25(3):245-257. |
WU Z Y, ZHOU Z K, LI D S, et al., 2003. The areal-types of the world families of seed plants[J]. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 25(3):245-257. | |
[29] | 张晓龙, 周继华, 蔡文涛, 等, 2017. 水分梯度下黑河流域荒漠植物群落多样性特征[J]. 生态学报, 37(14):4627-4635. |
ZHANG X L, ZHOU J H, CAI W T, et al., 2017. Diversity characteristics of plant communities in the arid desert of the Heihe basin under different moisture gradients[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(14):4627-4635. | |
[30] | 张晓龙, 周继华, 来利明, 等, 2019. 黑河下游荒漠河岸地带土壤水盐和养分的空间分布特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 28(9):1739-1747. |
ZHANG X L, ZHOU J H, LAI L M, et al., 2019. Spatial characterization of soil water-salt and nutrient in a desert riparian area along the lower reaches of Heihe River, China[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 28(9):1739-1747. | |
[31] | 张晓龙, 周继华, 来利明, 等, 2021. 荒漠河岸多枝柽柳灌丛碳氮磷化学计量特征及其影响因素[J]. 环境科学研究, 34(3):698-706. |
ZHANG X L, ZHOU J H, LAI L M, et al., 2021. Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometric characteristics of Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb. shrubland and their influencing factors in a desert riparian area of China[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 34(3):698-706. | |
[32] | 张新时, 1987. 中国的几种植被类型(Ⅳ)温带荒漠与荒漠生态系统[J]. 生物学通报, 7:20-22. |
ZHANG X S, 1987. Several vegetation types in China (Ⅳ) temperate desert and desert ecosystem[J]. Bulletin of Biology, 7:20-22. | |
[33] | 张雪妮, 杨晓东, 吕光辉, 2016. 水盐梯度下荒漠植物多样性格局及其与土壤环境的关系[J]. 生态学报, 36(11):3206-3215. |
ZHANG X N, YANG X D, LV G H, 2016. Diversity patterns and response mechanisms of desert plants to the soil environment along soil water and salinity gradients[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(11):3206-3215. |
[1] | HOU Hui, YAN Peixuan, XIE Qinmi, ZHAO Hongliang, PANG Danbo, CHEN Lin, LI Xuebin, HU Yang, LIANG Yongliang, NI Xilu. Characterization of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Community Diversity in the Rhizosphere Soils of Prunus mongolica Scrub of Helan Mountain [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 857-865. |
[2] | JIANG Yongwei, DING Zhenjun, YUAN Junbin, ZHANG Zheng, LI Yang, WEN Qingchun, WANG Yeyao, JIN Xiaowei. Study on Benthic Macroinvertebrates Community Structure and Water Quality Evaluation in Main Rivers of Liaoning Province [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 969-979. |
[3] | WANG Yun, ZHENG Xilai, CAO Min, LI Lei, SONG Xiaoran, LIN Xiaolei, GUO Kai. Study on Denitrification Performance and Control Factors in Brackish-Freshwater Transition Zone of Coastal Aquifer [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 980-988. |
[4] | KOU Zhu, QING Chun, YUAN Changguo, LI Ping. Diversity and Distribution of Sulfur Oxidizing Bacteria in Hot Springs of Northeast Tibet, China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 989-1000. |
[5] | HU Fang, LIU Jutao, WEN Chunyun, HAN Liu, WEN Hui. Phytoplankton Community Structure and Evaluation of Aquatic Ecological Conditions in Fu River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(4): 744-755. |
[6] | YU Fei, ZENG Hailong, FANG Huaiyang, FU Lingfang, LIN Shu, DONG Jiahao. Spatio-temporal Variation Characteristics of Phytoplankton Functional Groups and Water Quality Evaluation in the Typical Tidal River Network [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(4): 756-765. |
[7] | WANG Lixiao, LIU Jinxian, CHAI Baofeng. Response of Soil Bacterial Community and Nitrogen Cycle during the Natural Recovery of Abandoned Farmland in Subalpine of the North China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(8): 1537-1546. |
[8] | WANG Yingcheng, YAO Shiting, JIN Xin, YU Wenzhen, LU Guangxin, WANG Junbang. Comparative Study on Soil Bacterial Diversity of Degraded Alpine Meadow in the Sanjiangyuan Region [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(4): 695-703. |
[9] | LIU Hongmei, HAI Xiang, AN Kerui, ZHANG Haifang, WANH Hui, ZHANG Yanjun, WANG Lili, ZHANG Guilong, YANG Dianlin. Effects of Different Fertilization Regimes on Community Structure Diversity of CO2-assimilating Bacteria in Maize Field of Fluvo-aquic Soil in North China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(4): 715-722. |
[10] | XIA Kai, DENG Pengfei, MA Ruihao, WANG Fei, WEN Zhengyu, XU Xiaoniu. Changes of Soil Bacterial Community Structure and Diversity from Conversion of Masson Pine Secondary Forest to Slash Pine and Chinese Fir Plantations [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(3): 460-469. |
[11] | SONG Xiuli, HUANG Ruilong, KE Caijie, HUANG Wei, ZHANG Wu, TAO Bo. Effects of Different Cropping Systems on Bacterial Community Structure and Diversity in Continuous Cropping Soil [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(3): 487-496. |
[12] | BAI Haifeng, WANG Yirui, SONG Jinxi, KONG Feihe, ZHANG Xuexian, LI Qi. Characteristics of Plankton Community Structure and Its Relation to Environmental Factors in Weihe River, China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(1): 117-130. |
[13] | HE Rui, JIANG Ran, YANG Fang, ZHANG Xinfeng, LIN Jianluan, ZHU Xiaoping, PENG Songyao. Characteristics of Meso-zooplankton Community and Its Relationship with Environmental Factors in Sea Water near Maoming [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(1): 142-150. |
[14] | LIU Bingru. Response of Thermal Adaptability of Soil Microbial Respiration and Microbial Community and Diversity to Global Climate Change: A Review [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(1): 181-186. |
[15] | JIA Chenbo, GUO Yang, MA Chenglian, SU Jianyu, XU Chunyan. Difference on Soil Microbial Community and Function of Healthy and Diseased Plants of Lycium barbarum Ningqi-1 [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(9): 1831-1841. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn