生态环境学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 362-377.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.03.004
李家蔚1(
), 黄凯2,*(
), 李盛泽1, 董路2, 于相毅3, 毛岩3, 孟耀斌1,*(
)
收稿日期:2025-07-07
修回日期:2025-11-27
接受日期:2025-12-23
出版日期:2026-03-18
发布日期:2026-03-13
通讯作者:
*E-mail: 作者简介:李家蔚(1999年生),女,博士研究生,研究方向为化学品环境安全评估。E-mail: LJWei@mail.bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
LI Jiawei1(
), HUANG Kai2,*(
), LI Shengze1, DONG Lu2, YU Xiangyi3, MAO Yan3, MENG Yaobin1,*(
)
Received:2025-07-07
Revised:2025-11-27
Accepted:2025-12-23
Online:2026-03-18
Published:2026-03-13
摘要:
该研究基于耦合浅水湖泊模块(LKZ Module)的SWAT-KM多介质环境模型,系统模拟2010-2024年历史期及2025-2030年未来共享社会经济路径(SSPs)情景下滇池流域邻苯二甲酸二辛酯(DOP)的时空迁移特征与生态风险,旨在揭示典型城市型入流湖泊DOP的多介质暴露机制及气候变化调控效应。模型以滇池流域为对象,整合多源高分辨率空间数据,并对DOP排放进行通量估算,系统模拟日尺度下DOP于水体、沉积物、土壤、大气、植被间的迁移转化。结果显示,1)SWAT-KM可有效再现DOP时空分布特征。2)DOP呈“核心聚集、外围稀释”格局,滇池北部主城区周边为高风险区,雨季河道水体质量浓度峰值可超130 ng·L−1;北部湖区沉积物质量分数峰值近4.0 mg·kg−1。3)2024年部分子流域水环境风险表征比率(RCRaqua)超过5,暴露风险显著。4)在SSP5-8.5与SSP3-7.0情境下,极端降水频率与强度升高,导致河道质量浓度峰值达2.8×103 ng·L−1,湖泊水体与沉积物DOP峰值分别达到2.7 ng·L−1与5.0 mg·kg−1。该研究构建了DOP全过程暴露与风险识别框架,首次在流域-湖泊尺度量化“城市面源-环境迁移-沉积再释放”过程链,并提出入湖河道污染负荷削减与风险预警等关键干预措施,显著提升了城市湖泊流域新污染物治理的科学性与前瞻性。
中图分类号:
李家蔚, 黄凯, 李盛泽, 董路, 于相毅, 毛岩, 孟耀斌. SWAT-KM环境暴露模拟支持下的滇池流域邻苯二甲酸二辛酯生态风险研判[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(3): 362-377.
LI Jiawei, HUANG Kai, LI Shengze, DONG Lu, YU Xiangyi, MAO Yan, MENG Yaobin. Ecological Risk Investigation of Di-n-octyl Phthalate in the Dianchi Lake Basin by Simulating SWAT-KM for Environmental Exposure[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(3): 362-377.
| 物理化学性质 | 参数数值 | 物理化学性质 | 参数数值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAS号 | 117-84-0 | 25 ℃时正辛醇/水分配系数(logKow) | 8.1 |
| 摩尔质量/(g·mol−1) | 390.6 | 25 ℃时有机碳分配系数(logKoc) | 5.22 |
| 20 ℃时水溶解度/(mg·L−1) | 0.022 | 生物富集系数(logF) 1) | 3.699 |
| 25 ℃时亨利定律常数/(Pa·m3·mol−1) | 0.263 | 正十六烷/空气分配系数的对数(L) 2) | 11.965 |
| 沸点/℃ | 384 | 分子氢键质子给体能力(A) 2) | 0 |
| 25 ℃时蒸气压/Pa | 3.6×10−4 | 分子氢键质子受体能力(B) 2) | 1.13 |
| 熔点/℃ | −50 | 过量分子摩尔折射率(E) 2) | 0.64 |
| 25 ℃时汽化焓/(kJ·mol−1) | 129 | 分子偶极/极化性(S) 2) | 1.29 |
| 20 ℃时密度/(g·cm−3) | 0.985 | McGowan分子体积(V)/(cm3·mol−1) 2) | 3.404 |
| 25 ℃时水生物降解速率常数/d−1 3) | 0.2 | 25 ℃时污水处理厂生物降解速率常数/d−1 3) | 0.72 |
| 28 ℃时土壤中的生物降解速率常数/d−1 3) | 0.03 | 厌氧环境下生物降解速率常数/d−1 3) | 0.036 |
| 快速域吸附速率(k1)/d−1 4) | 1.125×10−2 | 慢速域吸附速率(k−1)/d−1 4) | 4.167×10−3 |
表1 DOP理化性质参数
Table1 Physicochemical properties of DOP
| 物理化学性质 | 参数数值 | 物理化学性质 | 参数数值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAS号 | 117-84-0 | 25 ℃时正辛醇/水分配系数(logKow) | 8.1 |
| 摩尔质量/(g·mol−1) | 390.6 | 25 ℃时有机碳分配系数(logKoc) | 5.22 |
| 20 ℃时水溶解度/(mg·L−1) | 0.022 | 生物富集系数(logF) 1) | 3.699 |
| 25 ℃时亨利定律常数/(Pa·m3·mol−1) | 0.263 | 正十六烷/空气分配系数的对数(L) 2) | 11.965 |
| 沸点/℃ | 384 | 分子氢键质子给体能力(A) 2) | 0 |
| 25 ℃时蒸气压/Pa | 3.6×10−4 | 分子氢键质子受体能力(B) 2) | 1.13 |
| 熔点/℃ | −50 | 过量分子摩尔折射率(E) 2) | 0.64 |
| 25 ℃时汽化焓/(kJ·mol−1) | 129 | 分子偶极/极化性(S) 2) | 1.29 |
| 20 ℃时密度/(g·cm−3) | 0.985 | McGowan分子体积(V)/(cm3·mol−1) 2) | 3.404 |
| 25 ℃时水生物降解速率常数/d−1 3) | 0.2 | 25 ℃时污水处理厂生物降解速率常数/d−1 3) | 0.72 |
| 28 ℃时土壤中的生物降解速率常数/d−1 3) | 0.03 | 厌氧环境下生物降解速率常数/d−1 3) | 0.036 |
| 快速域吸附速率(k1)/d−1 4) | 1.125×10−2 | 慢速域吸附速率(k−1)/d−1 4) | 4.167×10−3 |
图3 2008-2024年DOP全国消费量与滇池流域人均向各环境介质排放强度变化趋势图
Figure 3 Trends in national DOP consumption and per capita emissions to environmental media in the Dianchi Lake Basin, 2008?2024
图5 滇池流域水环境中DOP时序模拟结果(以17号子流域为例)
Figure 5 Simulated temporal dynamics of DOP in the aquatic environment of the Dianchi Lake Basin (example of Subbasin 17)
图10 滇池流域2024年不同季节DOP水生态风险表征比率(RCRaqua)空间分布图
Figure 10 Seasonal spatial distribution of ecological risk characterization ratio (RCRaqua) for DOP in the Dianchi Lake Basin in 2024
图11 不同SSPs情景下17号子流域DOP水体与活跃层沉积物浓度模拟结果
Figure 11 Simulated DOP concentrations in water and active layer sediment under different SSP scenarios in Subbasin 17
图12 不同SSPs情景下滇池湖泊分区1中DOP水体与沉积物浓度模拟结果
Figure 12 Simulated DOP concentrations in water and sediment under different SSPs scenarios in Lake Zone 1 of Dianchi Lake
| 水体类型 | 采样区域 | 采样时间 | DOP平均质量浓度 | DOP质量浓度范围 | 参考文献 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 湖泊 | 广州城市湖泊 | 2006年8月13日-18日 | - | N.D.-10.0 ng·L−1 | Zeng et al., |
| 巢湖 | 2010年5月-2011年4月 | 35.0 ng·L−1 | N.D.-45.0 ng·L−1 | He et al., | |
| 什刹海 | 2012年4-5月 | 19.0 ng·L−1 | 15.0-22.0 ng·L−1 | Zheng et al., | |
| 颐和园湖泊 | 2012年4-5月 | 19.0 ng·L−1 | 16.0-24.0 ng·L−1 | Zheng et al., | |
| 太湖 | 2014年12月 | 160.0 ng·L−1 | 7.0-59.0 ng·L−1 | Gao et al., | |
| 兴凯湖 | 2017年6月25日 | 2.0 ng·L−1 | N.D.-7.0 ng·L−1 | Yang et al., | |
| 鄱阳湖 | 2018年12月-2019年7月 | 10.0 ng·L−1 | N.D.-18.0 ng·L−1 | Ai et al., | |
| 高邮湖 | 2021年6月 | - | N.D.-8.0 ng·L−1 | Huang et al., | |
| 河道 | 长江武汉段 | 2005年6月和12月 | - | N.D.-3.2×103 ng·L−1 | Wang et al., |
| 珠江口 | 2013年1-6月 | 366.0 ng·L−1 | N.D.-4.2×103 ng·L−1 | Li et al., | |
| 松花江 | 2016年7月 | - | N.D.-621.0 ng·L−1 | Wen et al., | |
| 长江上游 | 2019年5-6月 | 2.7 ng·L−1 | 0.5-8.7 ng·L−1 | Ren et al., | |
| 汉江 | 2019年6月-2020年1月 | 32.5 ng·L−1 | N.D.-162.0 ng·L−1 | Dong et al., | |
| 沉积物 | 什刹海 | 2012年4-5月 | 0.82 mg·kg−1 | 0.01-2.62 mg·kg−1 | Zheng et al., |
| 颐和园湖泊 | 2012年4-5月 | 0.30 mg·kg−1 | N.D.-0.60 mg·kg−1 | Zheng et al., | |
| 太湖 | 2014年12月 | 7.41 mg·kg−1 | 0.48-16.20 mg·kg−1 | Gao et al., |
表2 国内主要水体中DOP实测浓度对比
Table 2 Measured concentrations of DOP in major water bodies in China
| 水体类型 | 采样区域 | 采样时间 | DOP平均质量浓度 | DOP质量浓度范围 | 参考文献 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 湖泊 | 广州城市湖泊 | 2006年8月13日-18日 | - | N.D.-10.0 ng·L−1 | Zeng et al., |
| 巢湖 | 2010年5月-2011年4月 | 35.0 ng·L−1 | N.D.-45.0 ng·L−1 | He et al., | |
| 什刹海 | 2012年4-5月 | 19.0 ng·L−1 | 15.0-22.0 ng·L−1 | Zheng et al., | |
| 颐和园湖泊 | 2012年4-5月 | 19.0 ng·L−1 | 16.0-24.0 ng·L−1 | Zheng et al., | |
| 太湖 | 2014年12月 | 160.0 ng·L−1 | 7.0-59.0 ng·L−1 | Gao et al., | |
| 兴凯湖 | 2017年6月25日 | 2.0 ng·L−1 | N.D.-7.0 ng·L−1 | Yang et al., | |
| 鄱阳湖 | 2018年12月-2019年7月 | 10.0 ng·L−1 | N.D.-18.0 ng·L−1 | Ai et al., | |
| 高邮湖 | 2021年6月 | - | N.D.-8.0 ng·L−1 | Huang et al., | |
| 河道 | 长江武汉段 | 2005年6月和12月 | - | N.D.-3.2×103 ng·L−1 | Wang et al., |
| 珠江口 | 2013年1-6月 | 366.0 ng·L−1 | N.D.-4.2×103 ng·L−1 | Li et al., | |
| 松花江 | 2016年7月 | - | N.D.-621.0 ng·L−1 | Wen et al., | |
| 长江上游 | 2019年5-6月 | 2.7 ng·L−1 | 0.5-8.7 ng·L−1 | Ren et al., | |
| 汉江 | 2019年6月-2020年1月 | 32.5 ng·L−1 | N.D.-162.0 ng·L−1 | Dong et al., | |
| 沉积物 | 什刹海 | 2012年4-5月 | 0.82 mg·kg−1 | 0.01-2.62 mg·kg−1 | Zheng et al., |
| 颐和园湖泊 | 2012年4-5月 | 0.30 mg·kg−1 | N.D.-0.60 mg·kg−1 | Zheng et al., | |
| 太湖 | 2014年12月 | 7.41 mg·kg−1 | 0.48-16.20 mg·kg−1 | Gao et al., |
| [1] |
AI S H, GAO X Y, WANG X N, et al., 2021. Exposure and tiered ecological risk assessment of phthalate esters in the surface water of Poyang Lake, China[J]. Chemosphere, 262: 127864.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
ARNOLD J G, SRINIVASAN R, MUTTIAH R S, et al., 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34(1): 73-89.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
BAI J Y, NIU Z L, MA Y L, et al., 2025. Extraction, determination, dietary and environmental risks assessment of phthalate acid esters in bottled water, liquor, and surface water[J]. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 19: 101648.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
BALOYI N D, TEKERE M, MAPHANGWA K W, et al., 2023. Appraisal of the temporospatial migration and potential ecotoxicity of phthalic acid esters in municipal effluents, rivers and dam—a catchment-wide assessment[J]. Water, 15(11): 2061.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
BIRDWELL J, COOK R L, THIBODEAUX L J, 2007. Desorption kinetics of hydrophobic organic chemicals from sediment to water: A review of data and models[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 26(3): 424-434.
PMID |
| [6] |
BRUSSEAU M L, REID M E, 1991. Nonequilibrium sorption of organic chemicals by low organic-carbon aquifer materials[J]. Chemosphere, 22(3-4): 341-350.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
DONG L, LIN L, PAN X, et al., 2022. Distribution dynamics of phthalate esters in surface water and sediment of the middle-lower Hanjiang River, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5): 2702.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
GAO X Y, LI J, WANG X N, et al., 2019. Exposure and ecological risk of phthalate esters in the Taihu Lake basin, China[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 171: 564-570.
DOI PMID |
| [9] |
GLOEGE L, MCKINLEY G A, MOONEY R J, et al., 2020. Lake hydrodynamics intensify the potential impact of watershed pollutants on coastal ecosystem services[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6): 064028.
DOI URL |
| [10] | GUINÉE J B, HEIJUNGS R, VAN OERS L, et al., 1996. LCA impact assessment of toxic releases: generic modelling of fate, exposure and effect for ecosystems and human beings with data for about 100 chemicals[R]. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Netherlands. |
| [11] |
HE W, QIN N, KONG X Z, et al., 2013. Spatio-temporal distributions and the ecological and health risks of phthalate esters (PAEs) in the surface water of a large, shallow Chinese lake[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 461-462: 672-680.
DOI URL |
| [12] | HOSTETLER S W, BARTLEIN P J, 1990. Simulation of lake evaporation with application to modeling lake level variations of Harney-Malheur Lake, Oregon[J]. Water Resources Research, 26(10): 2603-2612. |
| [13] |
HUANG C Y, GONG X H, QIN Y, et al., 2024. Risk assessment of China’s Eastern Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project from the perspective of phthalate esters occurrence in the impounded lakes[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 473: 134511.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
KLOTZ M, SCHMIDT S, WIESINGER H, et al., 2024. Increasing the recycling of PVC flooring requires phthalate removal for ensuring consumers’ safety: A cross-checked substance flow analysis of plasticizers for Switzerland[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 58(42): 18686-18700.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
LAMARCHE G, LURTON X, 2018. Introduction to the special issue “Seafloor backscatter data from swath mapping echosounders: From technological development to novel applications” [J]. Marine Geophysical Research, 39(1): 1-3.
DOI |
| [16] |
LI X M, BAO L W, WEI Y, et al., 2023. Occurrence, bioaccumulation, and risk assessment of microplastics in the aquatic environment: A review[J]. Water, 15(9): 1768.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
LI X H, YIN P H, ZHAO L, 2016. Phthalate esters in water and surface sediments of the Pearl River Estuary: distribution, ecological, and human health risks[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(19): 19341-19349.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
LIANG J Y, NING X A, KONG M Y, et al., 2017. Elimination and ecotoxicity evaluation of phthalic acid esters from textile-dyeing wastewater[J]. Environmental Pollution, 231(Part 1): 115-122.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
LÜ X M, WU Y C, CHEN G L, et al., 2022. The strategy for estrogen receptor mediated-risk assessment in environmental water: a combination of species sensitivity distributions and in silico approaches[J]. Environmental Pollution, 309: 119763.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
MENG X Y, WANG H, 2017. Significance of the China meteorological assimilation driving datasets for the SWAT model (CMADS) of east Asia[J]. Water, 9(10): 765.
DOI URL |
| [21] | MORIASI D N, ARNOLD J G, VAN LIEW M W, et al., 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations[J]. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 50(3): 885-900. |
| [22] | MORIASI D N, GITAU M W, PAI N, et al., 2015. Hydrologic and water quality models: Performance measures and evaluation criteria[J]. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 58(6): 1763-1785. |
| [23] |
MUÑOZ-SABATER J, DUTRA E, AGUSTÍ-PANAREDA A, et al., 2021. ERA5-Land: A state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications[J]. Earth System Science Data, 13(9): 4349-4383.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
MURILLO-TORRES R, DURÁN-ÁLVAREZ J C, PRADO B, et al., 2012. Sorption and mobility of two micropollutants in three agricultural soils: A comparative analysis of their behavior in batch and column experiments[J]. Geoderma, 189-190: 462-468.
DOI URL |
| [25] | PETERSON D R, STAPLES C A, 2003. Degradation of Phthalate Esters in the Environment[M]. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 85-124. |
| [26] |
PIRONTI C, RICCIARDI M, PROTO A, et al., 2021. Endocrine-Disrupting Compounds: an overview on their occurrence in the aquatic environment and human exposure[J]. Water, 13(10): 1347.
DOI URL |
| [27] |
REN J N, ZHU N Z, MENG X Z, et al., 2023. Occurrence and ecological risk assessment of 16 phthalates in surface water of the mainstream of the Yangtze River, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(25): 66936-66946.
DOI |
| [28] |
SÆBØ A, POPEK R, NAWROT B, et al., 2012. Plant species differences in particulate matter accumulation on leaf surfaces[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 427-428: 347-354.
DOI URL |
| [29] |
SETH R, MACKAY D, MUNCKE J, 1999. Estimating the organic carbon partition coefficient and its variability for hydrophobic chemicals[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 33(14): 2390-2394.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
STAPLES C A, PETERSON D R, PARKERTON T F, et al., 1997. The environmental fate of phthalate esters: A literature review[J]. Chemosphere, 35(4): 667-749.
DOI URL |
| [31] |
WANG F, XIA X H, SHA Y J, 2008b. Distribution of phthalic acid esters in Wuhan section of the Yangtze River, China[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 154(1-3): 317-324.
DOI URL |
| [32] |
WANG P, WANG S L, FAN C Q, 2008a. Atmospheric distribution of particulate- and gas-phase phthalic esters (PAEs) in a metropolitan city, Nanjing, East China[J]. Chemosphere, 72(10): 1567-1572.
DOI URL |
| [33] |
WANG X Y, HU E, YANG C H, et al., 2023. Occurrence, distribution and risk assessment of phthalate esters in 51 urban wastewater treatment plants in Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 11(3): 110075.
DOI URL |
| [34] |
WANG Y F, QIAN H F, 2021. Phthalates and their impacts on human health[J]. Healthcare, 9(5): 603.
DOI URL |
| [35] |
WEN Z D, HUANG X L, GAO D W, et al., 2018. Phthalate esters in surface water of Songhua River watershed associated with land use types, Northeast China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(8): 7688-7698.
DOI URL |
| [36] |
YANG Q, HUANG X L, WEN Z D, et al., 2021. Evaluating the spatial distribution and source of phthalate esters in the surface water of Xingkai Lake, China during summer[J]. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 47(2): 437-446.
DOI URL |
| [37] |
ZENG F, WEN J X, CUI K Y, et al., 2009. Seasonal distribution of phthalate esters in surface water of the urban lakes in the subtropical city, Guangzhou, China[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 169(1-3): 719-725.
DOI PMID |
| [38] |
ZHANG F Y, LI X B, WANG X, et al., 2025. CMIP6-driven 10 km super-resolution daily climate projections with PET estimates in China[J]. Scientific Data, 12(1): 720.
DOI |
| [39] |
ZHENG X X, ZHANG B T, TENG Y G, 2014. Distribution of phthalate acid esters in lakes of Beijing and its relationship with anthropogenic activities[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 476-477: 107-113.
DOI PMID |
| [40] |
ZHU Q Q, XU L Y, WANG W Y, et al., 2022. Occurrence, spatial distribution and ecological risk assessment of phthalate esters in water, soil and sediment from Yangtze River Delta, China[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 806(Part 4): 150966.
DOI URL |
| [41] | 常敏, 2017. 2016年中国邻苯二甲酸二辛酯市场分析及前景展望[J]. 中国石油和化工经济分析 (10): 61-63. |
| CHANG M, 2017. Market analysis and prospect of dioctyl phthalate in China in 2016[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Industry Economic Analysis (10): 61-63. | |
| [42] | 李玉芳, 伍小明, 2022. 我国邻苯二甲酸二辛酯的市场分析[J]. 精细与专用化学品, 30(12): 14-16. |
| LI Y F, WU X M, 2022. Market analysis of dioctyl phthalate in China[J]. Fine and Specialty Chemicals, 30(12): 14-16. | |
| [43] | 龙清风, 孟耀斌, 李想, 等, 2023. 基于SWAT-KM暴露模拟的环境暴露与环境风险分析方法——以壬基酚为例[J]. 生态毒理学报, 18(2): 420-433. |
| LONG Q F, MENG Y B, LI X, et al., 2023. Environmental risk analysis for chemicals with exposure model of SWAT-KM: a demonstrative study with nonylphenol[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 18(2): 204-218. | |
| [44] | 吕睿, 赵好轩, 麦富生, 等, 2024. 滇池流域表层沉积物溶解性有机质分布特征及其环境意义[J]. 环境科学学报, 44(8): 337-350. |
| LÜ R, ZHAO H X, MAI F S, et al., 2024. Characteristics of dissolved organic matter distribution in surface sediments of Dianchi basin and its environmental significance[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 44(8): 337-350. | |
| [45] | 孟耀斌, 李家蔚, 李盛泽, 等, 2025. 满足流域尺度的湖泊中化学物质环境暴露浓度模拟方法: 中国, ZL2025108049334 [P]. 2025-09-23 [2025-09-29]. http://epub.cnipa.gov.cn/. |
| MENG Y B, LI J W, LI S Z, et al., 2025. Simulation Method for Environmental Exposure Concentration of Chemicals in Lakes at Watershed Scale: China, ZL2025108049334[P]. 2025-09-23 [2025-09-29]. http://epub.cnipa.gov.cn/. | |
| [46] | 孟耀斌, 李想, 龙清风, 2021. 化学物质环境暴露模拟模型SWAT-KM技术文档及使用手册[R]. 北京: 北京师范大学. |
| MENG Y B, LI X, LONG Q F, 2021. Technical documentation and user manual for the SWAT-KM environmental chemical exposure simulation model[R]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University. | |
| [47] | 孟耀斌, 李想, 宋昊政, 等, 2022a. 环境系统模拟中化学物质的土壤行为模拟方法: 中国, ZL202110397263.0 [P]. 2022-04-22 [2025-09-29]. http://epub.cnipa.gov.cn/. |
| MENG Y B, LI X, SONG H Z, et al., 2022a. Simulation Method for the Soil Behavior of Chemicals in Environmental System Simulation: China, ZL202110397263.0[P]. 2022-04-22 [2025-09-29]. http://epub.cnipa.gov.cn/. | |
| [48] | 孟耀斌, 李想, 宋昊政, 2022b. 化学物质环境系统行为模拟中大气行为的简化模拟方法: 中国, ZL202110396188.6 [P]. 2022-08-26 [2025-09-29]. http://epub.cnipa.gov.cn/. |
| MENG Y B, LI X, SONG H Z, 2022b. Optimization of the Multiple Migration Processes Sequence for Chemicals Behavior Simulation in Environmental System: China, ZL202110396188.6[P]. 2022-08-26 [2025-09-29]. http://epub.cnipa.gov.cn/. | |
| [49] | 孟耀斌, 宋昊政, 李想, 2022c. 化学物质环境系统行为模拟中迁移过程计算顺序优化方法: 中国, ZL202110533940.7 [P]. 2022-07-22 [2025-09-29]. http://epub.cnipa.gov.cn/. |
| MENG Y B, SONG H Z, LI X, 2022c. Calculation Sequence Optimization Method for Migration Process in Environmental System Behavior Simulation of Chemicals: China, ZL202110533940.7[P]. 2022-07-22 [2025-09-29]. http://epub.cnipa.gov.cn/. | |
| [50] | 孟耀斌, 2022. 化学物质环境系统模拟中与植物相关的行为模拟方法: 中国, ZL202110397243.3 [P]. 2022-11-11 [2025-09-29]. http://epub.cnipa.gov.cn/. |
| MENG Y B, 2022. Simulation of Plant-Related Behavior in Environmental System Simulation of Chemicals: China, ZL202110397243.3[P]. 2022-11-11 [2025-09-29]. http://epub.cnipa.gov.cn/. | |
| [51] | 生态环境部, 2020. 《化学物质环境与健康暴露评估技术导则(试行)》[S]. 北京: 生态环境部. |
| Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China, 2020. Technical Guidelines for Environmental and Health Exposure Assessment of Chemical Substances (Trial) [S]. Beijing: Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. | |
| [52] | 生态环境部, 国家疾控局, 2025. 关于公开征求〈优先控制化学品名录(第三批) 征求意见稿〉意见的函[EB/OL]. 公告 2025年第381号, (2025-11-19) [2025-11-27]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk06/202511/W020251121684275316163.pdf. |
| Ministry of Ecology and Environment, National Disease Control and Prevention Administration, 2025. Letter on Soliciting Public Comments on the “List of Priority Control Chemicals (Third Batch) (Draft for Comments)” [EB/OL]. Announcement No. 381 of 2025, ( 2025-11-19) [2025-11-27]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk06/202511/W020251121684275316163.pdf. | |
| [53] | 史学正, 于东升, 高鹏, 等, 2007. 中国土壤信息系统 (SISChina) 及其应用基础研究[J]. 土壤, 39(3): 329-333. |
| SHI X Z, YU D S, GAO P, et al., 2007. Soil Information System of China (SISChina) and its applications[J]. Soil, 39(3): 329-333. | |
| [54] | 谭捷, 2018. 我国邻苯二甲酸二辛酯的市场分析[J]. 精细与专用化学品, 26(1): 10-14. |
| TAN J, 2018. Market analysis of dioctyl phthalate in China[J]. Fine and Specialty Chemicals, 26(1): 10-14. | |
| [55] | 张英, 邵智, 吴雪, 等, 2024. 滇池流域汛期污染特征及分区管控策略研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 46(7): 1076-1084. |
| ZHANG Y, SHAO Z, WU X, et al., 2024. Research on the pollutant characteristics during the flood season and partition management methods in the Dianchi Lake[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 46(7): 1076-1084. |
| [1] | 周浩然, 何涛, 彭恋, 钟志明, 钱宝. 长江流域重要水源地微塑料赋存特征及生态风险评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(3): 345-351. |
| [2] | 刘崇万, 朱晓华, 王明华, 徐志华, 任娣, 杨洪生, 万金娟. 江苏典型淡水鱼类养殖尾水抗生素污染特征、生态风险及其与环境理化因子相关性[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(3): 378-392. |
| [3] | 杜方旎, 冯青靓, 原寒, 曹少飞. 模式鱼类生物标志物在放射生态学研究中的应用及前景[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(8): 1182-1191. |
| [4] | 田蜜, 廖日权, 张健, 董凤凤, 唐建辉. 钦州湾全氟/多氟烷基化合物的污染特征及生态风险评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(7): 1020-1028. |
| [5] | 郭欣达, 付奔, 余思洁, 侯鹰, 陈卫平. 城市内涝和夏季高温风险评价与优先管控区识别方法研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(5): 731-742. |
| [6] | 张艳, 张少娟, 吕韬, 贺慧汀. 黄河流域(内蒙古段)景观生态风险与生境质量的耦合协同关系研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(12): 1841-1852. |
| [7] | 张舒涵, 姜海玲, 于海淋, 冯馨慧. 沈阳现代化都市圈景观生态风险时空演变及驱动力分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(9): 1471-1481. |
| [8] | 李程, 程志鹏, 刘育金, 姚义鸣, 李春雷. 全(多)氟烷基化合物生态风险及其管控政策研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(6): 980-996. |
| [9] | 李慧, 邓佳伟, 李亚鑫, 母滢琦. 秦岭北麓典型流域径流对气候和土地利用变化的响应——以灞河流域为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(5): 802-811. |
| [10] | 李彩虹. 基因技术生态风险的伦理治理探析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(5): 824-830. |
| [11] | 闫兴蕊, 龚平, 王小萍, 商立海, 李一农, 毛飞剑, 牛学锐, 张勃. 三江源地区土壤和牧草中的有机氯污染物:分布、来源和生态风险[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(3): 428-438. |
| [12] | 唐舒娅, 王春辉, 宋靖, 李刚. 环象山港区域土壤重金属污染特征及风险评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(11): 1768-1781. |
| [13] | 陈鸿展, 区晖, 叶四化, 张倩华, 周树杰, 麦磊. 珠江广州段水体微塑料的时空分布特征及生态风险评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(9): 1663-1672. |
| [14] | 李惠梅, 李荣杰, 晏旭昇, 武非非, 高泽兵, 谭永忠. 青海湖流域生态风险评价及生态功能分区研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(7): 1185-1195. |
| [15] | 胡习邦, 关晓彤, 谢紫霞, 张修玉. 农用地土壤中邻苯二甲酸二乙基已基酯的污染现状及生态风险评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(12): 2083-2093. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||