PM2.5中水溶性有机碳的污染特征、吸光特性和来源研究

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2024.07.008

生态环境学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7): 1072-1078.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2024.07.008

• 研究论文【环境科学】 • 上一篇下一篇

PM_2.5中水溶性有机碳的污染特征、吸光特性和来源研究

张俊美¹(), 王志宇¹, 杨本勇¹, 杨书申¹^,^*(), 杨凌霄²

1.中原工学院能源与环境学院，河南郑州 450007
2.山东大学环境研究院，山东青岛 266237

收稿日期:2024-03-05 出版日期:2024-07-18 发布日期:2024-09-04
通讯作者: *杨书申。E-mail: yangss@zut.edu.cn
作者简介:张俊美（1990年生），女，副教授，博士，研究方向为气溶胶理化特性和来源研究，气溶胶对人体健康风险评估。E-mail: jmzhangchina@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41375145);河南省自然科学基金项目(212300410322);青年人才创新能力基金项目(K2020QN017)

Pollution Characteristics, Light Absorption and Sources of Water-soluble Organic Carbon in PM_2.5

ZHANG Junmei¹(), WANG Zhiyu¹, YANG Benyong¹, YANG Shushen¹^,^*(), YANG Lingxiao²

1. School of Energy & Environment, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450007, P. R. China
2. Environment Research Institute, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, P. R. China

Received:2024-03-05 Online:2024-07-18 Published:2024-09-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

大气颗粒物中水溶性有机碳（WSOC），碳质气溶胶的重要组成部分，因其具有吸光性和吸湿性，且含有有毒的组分，对区域气候变化和人体健康具有重要的影响。郑州是颗粒物污染严重的大都市，对WSOC的短期或长期研究均很匮乏。为探究郑州大气PM_2.5中WSOC的污染特征、季节变化、来源和吸光特性，于2020年12月－2021年10月4个不同季节连续采集PM_2.5样品，对WSOC的浓度（总有机碳分析仪）和吸光特性（紫外－可见分光光度计）进行分析，并结合水溶性无机离子（离子色谱），有机碳（OC）和元素碳（EC）（热光反射碳分析仪）数据对WSOC进行来源解析。结果表明，采样期间WSOC的质量浓度年平均值为(13.6±7.48) μg∙m⁻³，且浓度具有明显的冬季高、夏季低的季节特征。与国内外研究对比发现，该研究的WSOC污染较严重，其对人体健康，对气候影响评估和预测的不确定性不容忽视。夏季WSOC对OC的贡献明显高于冬季，表明夏季二次生成的重要影响。正定矩阵因子分解法（PMF）和相关性分析结果显示WSOC主要来源包括生物质燃烧，二次生成和机动车尾气排放，其次是煤燃烧和土壤/建筑尘源。WSOC的光吸收指数（AAE）年平均值为6.88±1.31，没有明显的季节变化。光吸收强度（A_bs365）年平均值为 (9.71±5.77) Mm⁻¹，通过相关性分析发现水溶性棕色碳（BrC）与WSOC具有相似的来源，冬季生物质燃烧，夏季二次生成均为其主要来源。质量吸收效率（MAE₃₆₅）年平均值为 (0.710±0.206) m²∙g⁻¹，与国内外研究相比，其大小处于中等水平，单位质量WSOC对郑州辐射强迫的影响不能忽略。A_bs365和MAE₃₆₅均具有与WSOC相同的季节变化特征，与不同季节WSOC的组成和排放源密切相关。

关键词: 水溶性有机碳, 污染特征, 季节变化, 来源, 吸光特性

Abstract:

Water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) in atmospheric particulate matter (PM) is an important component of carbonaceous aerosols that has a significant impact on regional climate change and human health owing to its light absorption, hygroscopic properties, and toxic components. In Zhengzhou, a megacity with heavy PM pollution, there is a lack of short-and long-term studies on WSOC. To investigate the pollution characteristics, seasonal variation, sources, and light absorption of water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) in PM_2.5, seasonal PM_2.5 samples were collected from December 2020 to October 2021. The concentration (using a total organic carbon analyzer) and light absorption parameters (UV-visible spectrophotometer) of WSOC were analyzed, and water-soluble inorganic ions (ion chromatography), organic carbon (OC), and elemental carbon (EC) (thermo-reflective carbon analyzer) were combined to identify the sources of WSOC. The results showed that the WSOC concentration averaged (13.56±7.48) μg∙m⁻³ during the sampling periods and exhibited significant seasonal variations, with the maximum value in winter and the minimum value in summer. Compared to domestic and foreign studies, WSOC pollution in this study was more serious, and its impact on human health and uncertainty in assessing and predicting climate impacts cannot be ignored. The contribution of WSOC to OC was significantly higher in summer than in winter, indicating the significant influence of secondary generations in summer. The major WSOC sources identified by the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model and correlation analysis were biomass burning, secondary generation, and vehicle exhaust emissions, followed by coal burning and soil/construction dust sources. The annual average light absorption index (AAE) was 6.88±1.31, with no significant seasonal variations. The annual average light absorption intensity (A_bs365) was (9.71±5.77) Mm⁻¹. Correlation analysis showed that water-soluble brown carbon (BrC) and WSOC had similar sources during the sampling period, with biomass burning in winter and secondary-generation burning in summer being the main sources. The annual average mass absorption efficiency (MAE₃₆₅) was (0.710±0.206) m²∙g⁻¹, which is a moderate level compared to domestic and foreign studies, and the influence of the WSOC mass unit on radiative forcing in Zhengzhou cannot be ignored. Both A_bs365 and MAE₃₆₅ had the same seasonal variation trend as WSOC, which was related to the composition and emission sources of WSOC in different seasons.

Key words: WSOC, pollution characteristics, seasonal variation, source, light absorption properties

中图分类号:

X131.1
X16

张俊美, 王志宇, 杨本勇, 杨书申, 杨凌霄. PM_2.5中水溶性有机碳的污染特征、吸光特性和来源研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(7): 1072-1078.

ZHANG Junmei, WANG Zhiyu, YANG Benyong, YANG Shushen, YANG Lingxiao. Pollution Characteristics, Light Absorption and Sources of Water-soluble Organic Carbon in PM_2.5[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(7): 1072-1078.

图/表 4

参考文献 29

[1]	ASA-AWUKU A, ENGELHART G J, LEE B H, et al., 2009. Relating CCN activity, volatility, and droplet growth kinetics of β-caryophyllene secondary organic aerosol[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry Physics, 9(3): 795-812.
[2]	BARRETT T E, SHEESLEY R J, 2014. Urban impacts on regional carbonaceous aerosols: Case study in central Texas[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 64(8): 917-926.
[3]	BONES D L, HENRICKSEN D K, MANG S A, et al., 2010. Appearance of strong absorbers and fluorophores in limonene-O₃ secondary organic aerosol due to NH₄⁺-mediated chemical aging over long time scales[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115(D5): D05203.
[4]	CAO J J, WU F K, CHOW J, et al., 2005. Characterization and source apportionment of atmospheric organic and elemental carbon during fall and winter of 2003 in Xi’an, China[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry Physics, 5: 3127-3137.
[5]	CHEN Y F, GE X, CHEN H, et al., 2018. Seasonal light absorption properties of water-soluble brown carbon in atmospheric fine particles in Nanjing, China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 187: 230-240.
[6]	CHENG Y, HE K B, ZHENG M, et al., 2011. Mass absorption efficiency of elemental carbon and water-soluble organic carbon in Beijing, China[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry Physics, 11: 11497-11510.
[7]	DU Z Z, HE K B, CHENG Y, et al., 2014a. A yearlong study of water-soluble organic carbon in Beijing I: Sources and its primary vs. secondary nature[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 92: 514-521.
[8]	DU Z Y, HE K B, CHENG Y, et al., 2014b. A yearlong study of water-soluble organic carbon in Beijing II: Light absorption properties[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 89: 235-241.
[9]	HE T, WU Y, WANG D, et al., 2023. Molecular compositions and optical properties of water-soluble brown carbon during the autumn and winter in Guangzhou, China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 296: 119573.
[10]	HECOBIAN A, ZHANG X, ZHENG M, et al., 2010. Water-soluble organic aerosol material and the light-absorption characteristics of aqueous extracts measured over the Southeastern United States[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry Physics, 10(13): 5965-5977.
[11]	HUANG R J, YANG L, CAO J J, et al., 2018. Brown carbon aerosol in urban Xi'an, Northwest China: The composition and light absorption properties[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(12): 6825-6833.
[12]	KIM H, KIM J Y, JIN H C, et al., 2016. Seasonal variations in the light-absorbing properties of water-soluble and insoluble organic aerosols in Seoul, Korea[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 129: 234-242.
[13]	LIU J, BERGIN M, GUO H, et al., 2013. Size-resolved measurements of brown carbon in water and methanol extracts and estimates of their contribution to ambient fine-particle light absorption[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry Physics, 13: 12389-12404.
[14]	SUTO N, KAWASHIMA H, 2021. Measurement report: Source characteristics of water-soluble organic carbon in PM_2.5 at two sites in Japan, as assessed by long-term observation and stable carbon isotope ratio[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry Physics, 21(15): 11815-11828.
[15]	VERMA V, RICO-MARTINEZ R, KOTRA N, et al., 2012. Contribution of water-soluble and insoluble components and their hydrophobic/ hydrophilic subfractions to the reactive oxygen species-generating potential of fine ambient aerosols[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(20): 11384-11392.
[16]	WEI Y, HUANG R J, YANG L, et al., 2020. Characterization of the light-absorbing properties, chromophore composition and sources of brown carbon aerosol in Xi’an, northwestern China[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry Physics, 20(8): 5129-5144.
[17]	WANG J Z, HO S, CAO J J, et al., 2015. Characteristics and major sources of carbonaceous aerosols in PM_2.5 from Sanya, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 530-531: 110-119.
[18]	WATSON J G, CHOW J C, LOWENTHAL D H, et al., 1994. Differences in the carbon composition of source profiles for diesel- and gasoline-powered vehicles[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 28(15): 2493-2505.
[19]	YU Q, CHEN J, QIN W H, et al., 2022. Oxidative potential associated with water-soluble components of PM_2.5 in Beijing: The important role of anthropogenic organic aerosols[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 433: 128839.
[20]	ZHANG S W, TANG H, LI Q, et al., 2021. Secondary organic aerosols in PM_2.5 in Bengbu, a typical city in central China: Concentration, seasonal variation and sources[J]. Atmosphere, 12(7): 854.
[21]	ZHAO M F, HUANG Z S, QIAO T, et al., 2015. Chemical characterization, the transport pathways and potential sources of PM_2.5 in Shanghai: Seasonal variations[J]. Atmospheric Research, 158-159: 66-78.
[22]	ZHANG X H, ZHANG X X, TALIFU D, et al., 2023. Secondary formation and influencing factors of WSOC in PM_2.5over Urumqi, NW China[J]. Atmosperic Enviroment, 293: 119450.
[23]	ZHU C S, CAO J J, HUANG R J, et al., 2018. Light absorption properties of brown carbon over the southeastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Science of the total Environment, 625: 246-251.
[24]	郭子雍, 阳宇翔, 彭龙, 等, 2021. 广州地区不同粒径段大气颗粒物中水溶性有机碳的吸光贡献[J]. 中国环境科学, 41(2): 497-504.
	GUO Z Y, YANG Y X, PENG L, et al., 2021. The size-resolved light absorption contribution of water-soluble organic carbon in the atmosphere of Guangzhou[J]. China Environmental Science, 41(2): 497-504.
[25]	刘晓妍, 2020. 南京地区水溶性有机碳气溶胶的来源于吸光特性[D]. 南京: 南京信息工程大学: 1-443.
	LIU X Y, 2020. Source and light absorption characterisitics of water-soluble organic carbonaceous aerosol in Nanjing[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology: 1-443.
[26]	唐淑婷, 2020. 济南市大气颗粒物中水溶性有机碳污染特征研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学: 1-111.
	TANG S T, 2020. The characteristics of water-soluble organic caarbon (WSOC) in PM_2.5 in Jinan[D]. Ji’nan: Shandong University: 1-111.
[27]	王芳, 2022. 洞庭湖地区PM_2.5中水溶性有机碳污染特征及来源研究[D]. 南昌: 东华理工大学: 1-188.
	WANG F, 2022. Characteristics and sources of water-soluble organic carbon pollution in PM_2.5 in Dongting Lake area[D]. Nanchang: East China University of Technology: 1-188.
[28]	张俊美, 陈仕霖, 王乾恒, 等, 2023. 郑州市大气PM_2.5中水溶性离子的污染特征及来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 4(2): 602-613.
	ZHANG J M, CHEN S L, WANG Q H, et al., 2023. Pollution Characteristics and Sources of Water-soluble Ions in PM_2.5 in Zhengzhou City[J]. Environmental Science, 4(2): 602-610.
[29]	朱鑫, 陈庆彩, 王擎雯, 等, 2022. 西安市大气颗粒物中棕碳的吸光性研究[J]. 大气与环境光学学报, 17(1): 125-135.
	ZHU X, CHEN Q C, WANG Q W, et al., 2022. Absorbance of brown carbon in atmospheric particulate matter in Xi’an[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 17(1): 125-135.

采样点	时间周期	春季	夏季	秋季	冬季	参考文献
本研究	2020‒2021	10.7±2.83	6.46±1.76	12.3±1.70	20.0±9.05	本研究
北京	2017‒2018	4.40±2.34	4.66±2.46	4.77±2.83	11.7±13.9	Yu et al., 2022
上海	2011‒2012	4.71±3.61	3.78±2.98	6.92±4.44	5.97±4.04	Zhao et al., 2015
济南	2015‒2017	5.06±2.38	6.77±4.20	5.85±2.31	12.3±5.91	唐淑婷, 2020
蚌埠	2019‒2020	4.43±2.17	3.17±1.22	6.08±2.15	8.08±4.08	Zhang et al., 2021
南京	2015‒2016	4.67	5.46	4.57	8.01	刘晓妍, 2020
长沙	2017‒2018	4.32±1.26	5.09±2.19	6.22±2.74	7.00±2.96	王芳, 2022
西安	2016‒2017	‒	3.29	‒	18.0	朱鑫等 2022
广州 (PM₁₀)	2015‒2016	3.60±1.16	2.42±0.51	3.87±1.51	5.07±2.80	郭子雍等, 2021
乌鲁木齐	2017‒2018	4.29	3.95	6.16	9.73	Zhang et al., 2023
德克萨斯州 (美国)	2011‒2012	1.3±0.55	2.0±1.3	1.9±1.6	1.3±0.76	Barrett et al., 2014
筑波 (日本)	2017‒2019	1.2±0.3	0.8±0.4	1.3±0.5	1.4±0.4	Suto et al., 2021

采样点	时间周期	春季	夏季	秋季	冬季	参考文献
本研究	2020‒2021	10.7±2.83	6.46±1.76	12.3±1.70	20.0±9.05	本研究
北京	2017‒2018	4.40±2.34	4.66±2.46	4.77±2.83	11.7±13.9	Yu et al., 2022
上海	2011‒2012	4.71±3.61	3.78±2.98	6.92±4.44	5.97±4.04	Zhao et al., 2015
济南	2015‒2017	5.06±2.38	6.77±4.20	5.85±2.31	12.3±5.91	唐淑婷, 2020
蚌埠	2019‒2020	4.43±2.17	3.17±1.22	6.08±2.15	8.08±4.08	Zhang et al., 2021
南京	2015‒2016	4.67	5.46	4.57	8.01	刘晓妍, 2020
长沙	2017‒2018	4.32±1.26	5.09±2.19	6.22±2.74	7.00±2.96	王芳, 2022
西安	2016‒2017	‒	3.29	‒	18.0	朱鑫等 2022
广州 (PM₁₀)	2015‒2016	3.60±1.16	2.42±0.51	3.87±1.51	5.07±2.80	郭子雍等, 2021
乌鲁木齐	2017‒2018	4.29	3.95	6.16	9.73	Zhang et al., 2023
德克萨斯州 (美国)	2011‒2012	1.3±0.55	2.0±1.3	1.9±1.6	1.3±0.76	Barrett et al., 2014
筑波 (日本)	2017‒2019	1.2±0.3	0.8±0.4	1.3±0.5	1.4±0.4	Suto et al., 2021

参数	春季	夏季	秋季	冬季	年平均
AAE	6.00±0.979	6.19±0.902	7.63±0.763	7.29±1.45	6.88±1.31
A_bs365	7.55±2.81	2.78±0.410	8.25±1.21	15.2±5.43	9.71±5.77
MAE₃₆₅	0.724±0.185	0.459±0.126	0.674±0.0923	0.851±0.185	0.710±0.206

参数	春季	夏季	秋季	冬季	年平均
AAE	6.00±0.979	6.19±0.902	7.63±0.763	7.29±1.45	6.88±1.31
A_bs365	7.55±2.81	2.78±0.410	8.25±1.21	15.2±5.43	9.71±5.77
MAE₃₆₅	0.724±0.185	0.459±0.126	0.674±0.0923	0.851±0.185	0.710±0.206

采样点	采样时间	冬季	夏季	参考文献
本研究	2020‒2021	0.851	0.459	本研究
北京	2010‒2011	1.26	0.51	Du et al., 2014b
西安	2015‒2016	1.85	0.91	Wei et al., 2020
西安	2016‒2017	2.05	1.06	朱鑫等, 2022
济南	2015‒2017	0.76	0.42	唐淑婷, 2020
广州 (PM_3.0)	2015‒2016	0.96	0.54	郭子雍等, 2021
南京	2015‒2016	1.04	0.51	Chen et al., 2018
首尔 (韩国)	2012‒2013	1.02	0.28	Kim et al., 2016
佐治亚州 (美国)	2007	0.62	0.29	Hecobian et al., 2010
鲁朗	2015‒2016	0.75	0.32	Zhu et al., 2018

PM_2.5中水溶性有机碳的污染特征、吸光特性和来源研究

Pollution Characteristics, Light Absorption and Sources of Water-soluble Organic Carbon in PM_2.5

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴文伟, 沈城, 沙晨燕, 林匡飞, 吴健, 谢雨晴, 周璇. 城市工业地块土壤重金属污染风险评价与源解析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(5): 791-801.
[2]	张淼, 王桂霞, 王昌伟, 贺艳云, 许艳芳, 李琪, 许杨, 张俊骁, 张桂芹. 济南市区黑碳污染变化特征及来源解析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(4): 560-572.
[3]	梁燕, 刘家齐, 肖凡, 潘民萍, 韦凯文, 张楚雯, 段敏. 氮沉降形态对西南岩溶区森林土壤有效磷来源的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(2): 192-201.
[4]	梁贝竹, 陈建耀, 杨再智, 张鹏程, 任坤, 梁作兵, 杨晨晨, 吴洁珊. 华南滨海小流域地下水中PPCPs的分布、来源及影响因素——以珠海市唐家湾镇为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(2): 249-260.
[5]	蒋伯琪, 浮天, 程昳璇, 苏枞枞, 沈建东, 于谨铖, 于兴娜. 沈阳市臭氧污染特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(1): 72-79.
[6]	陈鸿展, 区晖, 叶四化, 张倩华, 周树杰, 麦磊. 珠江广州段水体微塑料的时空分布特征及生态风险评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(9): 1663-1672.
[7]	张怀成, 韩红, 王在峰, 韩立钊, 刘克, 张桂芹, 范晶, 魏小锋. 济南市城市扬尘的微观形貌和化学组分特征分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(3): 545-555.
[8]	李海燕, 杨小琴, 简美鹏, 张晓然. 城市水体中微塑料的来源、赋存及其生态风险研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(2): 407-420.
[9]	李姝亭, 胡冠九, 罗小三. 大气环境中全（多）氟烷基化合物（PFASs）的来源、分布及健康风险研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(12): 2103-2114.
[10]	黄国锋, 贺斌, 谢志宜, 刘军, 王安侯, 廖彤, 王博瑾, 郝贝贝. 广东省农业源污染对水环境的影响及其空间分异格局[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(12): 2207-2215.
[11]	李少宁, 李婷婷, 陶雪莹, 赵娜, 徐晓天, 鲁绍伟. 4种落叶树种释放有益挥发性有机物的比较研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(1): 123-128.
[12]	陈小南, 李琼雯, 余建平, 余顺海, 李双, 曹铭昌. 钱江源国家公园白颈长尾雉生境适宜性评价研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(9): 1832-1839.
[13]	王默雷, 李智慧, 陈来国, 郭送军, 刘明, 王硕, 陆海涛. 城市垃圾焚烧厂烟气及周边土壤中多溴联苯醚的污染特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(8): 1582-1589.
[14]	樊珂宇, 高原, 赖子尼, 曾艳艺, 刘乾甫, 李海燕, 麦永湛, 杨婉玲, 魏敬欣, 孙金辉, 王超. 珠三角河网鱼类微塑料污染特征研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(8): 1590-1598.
[15]	朱丽, 闫怀忠, 孙友敏, 范晶, 刘光辉, 张桂芹. 山东典型重工业区降尘污染特征及成因分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(7): 1393-1399.

PM2.5中水溶性有机碳的污染特征、吸光特性和来源研究

Pollution Characteristics, Light Absorption and Sources of Water-soluble Organic Carbon in PM2.5

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

PM_2.5中水溶性有机碳的污染特征、吸光特性和来源研究

Pollution Characteristics, Light Absorption and Sources of Water-soluble Organic Carbon in PM_2.5