成都市河流中四环素、喹诺酮类抗生素污染特征及生态风险评价

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.11.003

生态环境学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 1922-1932.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.11.003

成都市河流中四环素、喹诺酮类抗生素污染特征及生态风险评价

韩迁(), 张玉娇^*(), 赖承钺, 杨璐瑶, 孟旭

成都市环境保护科学研究院，四川成都 610072

收稿日期:2022-11-28 出版日期:2023-11-18 发布日期:2024-01-17
通讯作者: * 张玉娇。E-mail: 379181725@qq.com
作者简介:韩迁（1996年生），女，助理工程师，主要研究方向为水环境中新兴污染物。E-mail: 1585518710@qq.com
基金资助:
成都市长江水生态环境保护研究(2022-LHYJ-02-0509-01)

Pollution Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment of Tetracycline and Quinolone Antibiotics in Rivers of Chengdu

HAN Qian(), ZHANG Yujiao^*(), LAI Chengyue, YANG Luyao, MENG Xu

Chengdu Research Institute of Environmental Protection Sciences, Chengdu 610072, P. R. China

Received:2022-11-28 Online:2023-11-18 Published:2024-01-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来抗生素的大量使用和滥用，导致抗生素在多种环境介质中均被检测到，其带来的生态风险和健康风险日益引起人们的广泛关注。成都市目前尚缺乏有关地表水抗生素污染的数据，因此，为了评估成都市不同流域中抗生素的分布特征以及生态风险，采用固相萃取（SPE）和高效液相色谱串联质谱法（HPLC-MS/MS），分别监测了成都市府河、西江河、毗河、濛阳河以及蒲江河5条流域中四环素、喹诺酮两大类共计25种抗生素在丰水期和枯水期的污染水平，并对其进行生态风险评价。结果表明，两个水期共检出16种抗生素，检出率介于0－90.3%之间；四环素在丰水期和枯水期均表现出较高的检出率，分别为87.1%和77.4%。两类抗生素总质量浓度表现为枯水期远高于丰水期，总质量浓度范围介于ND－642 ng∙L⁻¹之间，平均质量浓度为65.6 ng∙L⁻¹。质量浓度最高的抗生素为喹诺酮类的氟罗沙星和氧氟沙星，分别为642 ng∙L⁻¹和384 ng∙L⁻¹，平均为245 ng∙L⁻¹和42.9 ng∙L⁻¹。在被研究的5个流域中，抗生素的残留水平依次为西江河>蒲江河>府河>毗河>濛阳河；与国内其他水体比较，成都市研究河流中抗生素的污染程度处于中等水平。根据欧盟技术指导文件中关于抗生素环境风险评价的方法，对其中比较常见的9种抗生素进行生态风险评价。结果表明，枯水期生态风险高于丰水期，其中，洛美沙星和诺氟沙星在濛阳河及西江河流域、强力霉素在蒲江河流域中的RQ均大于1。抗生素生态加和风险RQ≥1，表明抗生素污染物的暴露对该流域生态环境有着潜在危害。

关键词: 成都市, 四环素, 喹诺酮, 丰水期, 枯水期, 污染水平, 生态风险评价

Abstract:

Due to the widespread use and abuse of antibiotics in recent years, antibiotics have already been detected in various environmental media, and the ecological and health risks caused by them have attracted widespread attention. However, Chengdu currently lacks data on antibiotic contamination of surface water. Therefore, to assess the distribution characteristics and ecological risks of antibiotics in different watersheds in Chengdu, in this paper, solid phase extraction (SPE) and high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) were used to monitor the pollution levels of tetracyclines and quinolones, which included a total of 25 kinds of antibiotics in five Chengdu watersheds of Fu River, Xijiang River, Pi River, Mengyang River, and Pujiang River in high and low flow periods. In addition, we also carried out an ecological risk assessment. The results showed that 16 antibiotics were detected in the two water periods, and the detection rates ranged from 0 to 90.3%. The tetracycline showed a high detection rate in both high and low flow periods, which were 87.1% and 77.4%, respectively. The total concentration of the two types of antibiotics was much higher in the low flow period than in the high flow period, the detected mass concentration ranged from ND to 642 ng L⁻¹, and the average mass concentration was 65.6 ng∙L⁻¹. The antibiotics with the highest concentration were the quinolones fleroxacin and ofloxacin, which were 642 ng∙L⁻¹ and 384 ng∙L⁻¹, respectively, and the average concentrations were 245 ng∙L⁻¹ and 42.9 ng∙L⁻¹. In the five watersheds studied, the residual levels of antibiotics were in the order of Xijiang River>Pujiang River>Fu River>Pi River>Mengyang River. Compared with other watersheds in China, the pollution degree of antibiotics was at a moderate level in the studied rivers. According to the environmental risk assessment method of antibiotics in the European Union technical guidance document, we conducted an ecological risk assessment for 9 kinds of the more common antibiotics. The results showed that the ecological risk in the dry season was higher than that in the high flow period. The RQ of lomefloxacin and norfloxacin in Mengyang River and Xijiang River and the doxycycline in Pujiang River were all greater than 1. The ecological additive risk of antibiotics RQ≥1, indicates that the exposure of antibiotic pollutants has potential harm to the ecological environment of the basin.

Key words: Chengdu, tetracycline, quinolone, wet season, dry season, pollution level, ecological risk assessment

中图分类号:

韩迁, 张玉娇, 赖承钺, 杨璐瑶, 孟旭. 成都市河流中四环素、喹诺酮类抗生素污染特征及生态风险评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(11): 1922-1932.

HAN Qian, ZHANG Yujiao, LAI Chengyue, YANG Luyao, MENG Xu. Pollution Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment of Tetracycline and Quinolone Antibiotics in Rivers of Chengdu[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(11): 1922-1932.

图/表 8

参考文献 39

[1]	ASHTON D, HILTON M, THOMAS K V, 2004. Investigating the environmental transport of human pharmaceuticals to streams in the United Kingdom[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 333(1-3): 167-184. DOI PMID
[2]	BENOǏT F, RAPHAEL M, BERNARD V, et al., 2009. Environmental risk assessment of six human pharmaceuticals: Are the current environmental risk assessment procedures sufficient for the protection of the aquatic environment[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 23(5): 1344-1354. DOI URL
[3]	BACKHAUS T, SCHOLZE M, GRIMME L H, 2000. The single substance and mixture toxicity of quinolones to the bioluminescent bacterium Vibrio fischeri[J]. Aquatic Toxicology, 49: 49-61. DOI URL
[4]	CLEUVERS M, 2004. Mixture toxicity of the anti-inflammatory drugs diclofenac, ibuprofen, naproxen and acetylsalicylic acid[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 59(3): 309-315. DOI URL
[5]	CLEUVERS M, 2003. Aquatic ecotoxicity of pharmaceuticals including the assessment of combination effects[J]. Toxicology Letters, 142(3): 185-194. DOI PMID
[6]	DONG D M, ZHANG L W, LIU S, et al., 2016. Antibiotics in water and sediments from Liao River in Jilin Province, China: Occurrence, distribution, and risk assessment[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(16): 1202. DOI URL
[7]	European Chemicals Bureau, 2003. Technical guidance document on risk assessment[R]. European Communities: European Commission Joint Research Center: 93-101.
[8]	FATTA-KASSINOS D, MERIC S, NIKOLAOU A, 2011. Pharmaceutical residues in environmental waters and wastewater: Current state of knowledge and future research[J]. Analytical Bioanalytical Chemistry, 399: 251-275. DOI URL
[9]	JIANG L, HU X L, YIN D Q, et al., 2011. Occurrence, distribution and seasonal variation of antibiotics in the Huangpu River, Shanghai, China[J]. Chemosphere, 82(6): 822-828. DOI PMID
[10]	LI S, SHI W Z, LI H M, et al., 2018. Antibiotics in water and sediments of rivers and coastal area of Zhuhai City, Pearl River estuary, South China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 636: 1009-1019. DOI URL
[11]	LIU X H, LU S Y, GUO W, et al., 2018. Antibiotics in the aquatic environments: A review of lakes, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 627: 1195-1208. DOI URL
[12]	LUO Y, XU L, RYSZ M, et al., 2011. Occurrence and transport of tetracycline, sulfonamide, quinolone, and macrolide antibiotics in the Haihe River basin, China[J]. Environment Science & Technology, 45(5): 1827-1833. DOI URL
[13]	LOFTIN K A, ADAMS C D, MEYER M T, et al., 2008. Effects of ionic strength, temperature, and pH on degradation of selected antibiotics[J]. Journal of Environmental Qual, 37: 378-386. DOI URL
[14]	MA Y P, LI M WU M M, et al., 2015. Occurrences and regional distributions of 20 antibiotics in water bodies during groundwater recharge[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 518-519: 498-506. DOI URL
[15]	PARK S, CHOI K, 2008. Hazard assessment of commonly used agricultural antibiotics on aquatic ecosystems[J]. Ecotoxicology, 17(6): 526-538. DOI PMID
[16]	QUINN B, GAGNE F, BLAISE C, 2008. An investigation into the acute and chronic toxicity of eleven pharmaceuticals (and their solvents) found in wastewater effluent on the cnidarian, Hydra attenuata [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 389(2-3): 306-314. DOI URL
[17]	SASSMAN S A, LEE L S, 2005. Sorption of three tetracyclines by several soils: assessing the role of pH and cation exchange[J]. Environmental Science ＆ Technology, 39(19): 7452-7459.
[18]	VAN D X, DEWULF J, VAN L H, et al., 2014. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics: an emerging class of environmental micropollutants[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 500-501: 250-269.
[19]	WANG Z Y, CHEN Q W, ZHANG J Y, et al., 2019. Characterization and source identification of tetracycline antibiotics in the drinking water sources of the lower Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 244: 13-22. DOI PMID
[20]	WANG Z, DU Y, YANG C, et al., 2017. Occurrence and ecological hazard assessment of selected antibiotics in the surfacewaters in and around Lake Honghu, China[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 609: 1423. DOI URL
[21]	WANG D, SUI Q, ZHAO W T, et al., 2014. Pharmaceutical and personal care products in the surface water of China: A review[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 59(9): 743-751. (in Chinese)
[22]	ZHANG Q Q, YING G G, PAN C G, et al., 2015. Comprehensive evaluation of antibiotics emission and fate in the river basins of China: Source analysis, multimedia modeling, and linkage to bacterial resistance[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(11): 6772-6782. DOI URL
[23]	ZHOU L J, YING G G, ZHANG R Q, et al., 2013. Use patterns, excretion masses and contamination profiles of antibiotics in a typical swine farm, south China[J]. Environmental Science Processes & Impacts, 15(4): 802-813.
[24]	陈亚君, 2020. 四环素类抗生素在微塑料和土壤中的吸附行为及其机理研究[D]. 南京: 南京师范大学: 3-4.
	CHEN Y J, 2020. Adsorption behavior and mechanism of tetracycline antibiotics in microplastics and soil[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University: 3-4.
[25]	高丽, 李翔, 张远, 等, 2014. 北京市清河中抗生素的污染特征研究[J]. 生态科学, 33(1): 83-92.
	GAO L, LI X, ZHANG Y, et al., 2014. Research on pollution characteristics of antibiotics in Qinghe River in Beijing[J]. Ecological Science, 33(1): 83-92.
[26]	侯为道, 傅小鲁, 杨元, 等, 2004. 动物性食品中兽药残留水平及膳食安全性评价[J]. 现代预防医学, 31(1): 47-49.
	HOU W D, FU X L, YANG Y, et al., 2004. Evaluation of veterinary drug residue levels and dietary safety in animal foods[J]. Modern Preventive medicine, 31(1): 47-49.
[27]	卢正山, 2020. 浑河沈抚段水体典型抗生素分布特征及风险评价[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳师范大学:19-28.
	LU Z S, 2020. Typical antibiotic distribution characteristics and risk assessment of water bodies in Shenfu section of Hunhe River[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Normal University:19-28.
[28]	李士俊, 谢文明, 2019. 污水处理厂中抗生素去除规律研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 42(3): 17-29.
	LI S J, XIE W M, 2019. Research advances in antibiotics removal in wastewater treatment plants: A review[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(3): 17-29.
[29]	李佳乐, 王瑶, 董一慧, 等, 2022. 鄱阳湖流域袁河水体典型抗生素分布特征及生态风险评价[J]. 生态毒理学报, 17(4): 7-12.
	LI J L, WANG Y, DONG Y H, et al., 2022. Distribution characteristics and ecological risk assessment of typical antibiotics in Yuanhe River of Poyang Lake Basin[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 17(4): 7-12.
[30]	莫苑敏, 黄亮亮, 2019. 广西青狮潭水库水体喹诺酮类抗生素的分布特征及生态风险评价[J]. 湖泊科学, 31(1): 124-133.
	MO Y M, HUANG L L, 2019. Distribution characteristics and ecological risk assessment of quinolone antibiotics in Qingshitan Reservoir, Guangxi[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 31(1): 124-133. DOI URL
[31]	农业部畜牧兽医局, 2003. 农业部发布动物性食品中兽药最高残留限量[J]. 中国兽药杂志, 37(2): 7-9.
	Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Bureau of the Ministry of Agriculture, 2003. The Ministry of Agriculture issues the maximum residue limits of veterinary drugs in animal food[J]. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 37(2): 7-9.
[32]	王桥军, 亦如瀚, 莫测辉, 等, 2009. 广州市水环境中喹诺酮类抗生素的污染特征[J]. 生态科学, 28(3): 276-280.
	WANG Q J, YI R H, MO C H, et al., 2009. The concentration characteristics of fluoroquinolone antibiotics in the aquatic environmental of Guangzhou[J]. Ecological Science, 28(3): 276-280.
[33]	杨俊, 王汉欣, 2019. 苏州市水环境中典型抗生素污染特征及生态风险评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 28(2): 359-368. DOI
	YANG J, WANG H X, 2019. Occurrence, distribution and risk assessment of typical antibiotics in the aquatic environment of Suzhou city[J]. Journal of Eco-Environment, 28(2): 359-368.
[34]	赵富强, 高会, 张克玉, 等, 2021. 中国典型河流水域抗生素的赋存状况及风险评估研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 43(1): 94-102.
	ZHAO F Q, GAO H, ZHANG K Y, et al., 2021. Study on the occurrence and risk assessment of antibiotics in typical river waters in China[J]. Environmental Pollution and Control, 43(1): 94-102.
[35]	张亚茹, 张国栋, 王永强, 等, 2021. 新疆赛里木湖近岸表层水典型抗生素的赋存与风险评价[J]. 湖泊科学, 33(2): 483-493.
	ZHANG Y R, ZHANG G D, WANG Y Q, et al., 2021. Occurrence and ecological risk of typical antibiotics in surface water of the Lake Sayram, Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 33(2): 483-493. DOI URL
[36]	张晶晶, 陈娟, 王沛芳, 等, 2021. 中国典型湖泊四大类抗生素污染特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 41(9): 4271-4283.
	HANG J J, CHEN J, WANG P F, et al., 2021. Pollution characteristics of four-type antibiotics in typical lakes in China[J]. China Environmental Science, 41(9): 4271-4283.
[37]	张亚茹, 张国栋, 2021. 新疆赛里木湖近岸表层水典型抗生素的赋存与风险评价[J]. 湖泊科学, 33(2): 483-493.
	ZHANG Y R, ZHANG G D, 2021. Appearance and risk evaluation of typical antibiotics in the coastal surface water of Sailimu Lake, Xinjiang[J]. Lake Science, 33(2): 483-493.
[38]	赵腾辉, 陈奕涵, 韩巍, 等, 2016. 东江上游典型抗生素污染特征及生态风险评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 25(10): 1707-1713. DOI
	ZHAO T H, CHEN Y H, HAN W, et al., 2016. The contamination characteristics and ecological risk assessment of typical antibiotics in the upper reaches of the Dongjiang River[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 25(10): 1707-1713.
[39]	张晓娇, 柏杨巍, 张远, 等, 2017. 辽河流域地表水中典型抗生素污染特征及生态风险评估[J]. 环境科学, 38(11): 4553-4561.
	ZHANG X J, BO Y W, ZHANG Y, et al., 2017. Characteristics of typical antibiotic contamination and ecological risk assessment in surface water in the Liaohe River Basin[J]. Environmental Science, 38(11): 4553-4561.

药物	丰水期					枯水期
药物	质量浓度范围	检出率	均值	中值	质量浓度最高点位	质量浓度范围	检出率	均值	中值	质量浓度最高点位
EATC	ND ¹⁾	0	ND	ND	‒ ²⁾	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
ATC	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
CTE	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
DCTC	3.34‒111	9.68	40.2	5.78	S25	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
DC	1.85‒3.41	13.3	2.67	2.86	S7	25.9‒158	16.1	65.6	44.7	S28
MTC	0.530‒11.4	32.3	3.64	2.29	S28	1.86‒84.3	58.1	19.9	15.2	S19
TC	0.140‒0.960	87.1	0.420	0.350	S12	0.170‒3.78	77.4	1.27	0.840	S22
CINO	0.130‒11.5	16.1	3.53	2.20	S23	17.6‒65.1	12.9	42.7	44.0	S25
CIP	0.420‒4.97	29.0	1.84	1.28	S5	1.29‒36.6	32.3	17.6	16.4	S29
DAN	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
DIF	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
ENO	0.490‒12.4	22.5	5.92	6.23	S8	2.45‒23.7	6.45	13.1	13.1	S12
ENR	0.250‒4.85	25.8	1.74	1.61	S12	21.2‒42.0	9.66	29.1	25.7	S12
FLE	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	31.1‒642	9.68	245	61.3	S15
FLU	0.140‒25.9	90.3	2.41	0.910	S23	1.66‒46.3	54.8	18.7	14.8	S14
LOM	0.120‒0.640	6.45	0.380	0.380	S4	6.39‒27.5	9.68	19.5	24.8	S13
MAR	0.170‒0.640	9.68	0.420	0.470	S15	5.38‒157	16.1	53.4	35.9	S15
NA	0.120‒0.750	6.45	0.430	0.430	S26	19.2‒75.4	22.6	46.4	43.2	S6
NOR	0.320‒0.920	12.9	0.510	0.410	S3	12.4‒42.7	12.9	24.4	21.4	S3
OFL	0.340‒141	61.3	11.9	2.24	S24	8.88‒384	54.9	73.8	42.0	S11
ORB	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	2.27‒4.79	9.68	3.76	4.12	S13
PEF	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
PPA	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
SAR	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
SPA	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒

药物	丰水期					枯水期
药物	质量浓度范围	检出率	均值	中值	质量浓度最高点位	质量浓度范围	检出率	均值	中值	质量浓度最高点位
EATC	ND ¹⁾	0	ND	ND	‒ ²⁾	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
ATC	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
CTE	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
DCTC	3.34‒111	9.68	40.2	5.78	S25	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
DC	1.85‒3.41	13.3	2.67	2.86	S7	25.9‒158	16.1	65.6	44.7	S28
MTC	0.530‒11.4	32.3	3.64	2.29	S28	1.86‒84.3	58.1	19.9	15.2	S19
TC	0.140‒0.960	87.1	0.420	0.350	S12	0.170‒3.78	77.4	1.27	0.840	S22
CINO	0.130‒11.5	16.1	3.53	2.20	S23	17.6‒65.1	12.9	42.7	44.0	S25
CIP	0.420‒4.97	29.0	1.84	1.28	S5	1.29‒36.6	32.3	17.6	16.4	S29
DAN	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
DIF	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
ENO	0.490‒12.4	22.5	5.92	6.23	S8	2.45‒23.7	6.45	13.1	13.1	S12
ENR	0.250‒4.85	25.8	1.74	1.61	S12	21.2‒42.0	9.66	29.1	25.7	S12
FLE	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	31.1‒642	9.68	245	61.3	S15
FLU	0.140‒25.9	90.3	2.41	0.910	S23	1.66‒46.3	54.8	18.7	14.8	S14
LOM	0.120‒0.640	6.45	0.380	0.380	S4	6.39‒27.5	9.68	19.5	24.8	S13
MAR	0.170‒0.640	9.68	0.420	0.470	S15	5.38‒157	16.1	53.4	35.9	S15
NA	0.120‒0.750	6.45	0.430	0.430	S26	19.2‒75.4	22.6	46.4	43.2	S6
NOR	0.320‒0.920	12.9	0.510	0.410	S3	12.4‒42.7	12.9	24.4	21.4	S3
OFL	0.340‒141	61.3	11.9	2.24	S24	8.88‒384	54.9	73.8	42.0	S11
ORB	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	2.27‒4.79	9.68	3.76	4.12	S13
PEF	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
PPA	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
SAR	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒
SPA	ND	0	ND	ND	‒	ND	0	ND	ND	‒

名称	TCs				QNs							参考文献
名称	CTC	DC	TC	TCsum	ENR	OFL	LOM	FLU	CIP	NOR	QNsum	参考文献
黄浦江	‒ ¹⁾	‒	15.1‒113	15.1‒113	ND²⁾	ND‒6.50	‒	‒	ND‒2.70	ND‒2.60	ND‒11.8	Jiang et al., 2011
珠江	ND‒33.0	‒	ND‒349	ND‒382	‒	ND‒703	‒	ND‒463	ND‒91.8	ND‒54.2	ND‒1.31×10³	Li et al., 2019
青狮潭	‒	‒	‒	‒	4.59‒6.06	50.0‒660	‒	‒	3.49‒6.22	3.70‒5.00	61.8‒677	莫苑敏等, 2019
清河	‒	‒	‒	‒	3.10‒ 6.30	6.40‒3.14×10³	‒	‒	35.8‒ 672	‒	45.3‒3.82×10³	高丽等, 2014
浑河	‒	‒	ND‒ 10.1	ND‒ 10.1	ND‒ 4.40	ND‒ 32.1	‒	‒	ND‒ 14.2	‒	ND‒50.7	卢正山, 2020
苏州市	‒	3.27‒454	4.06‒547	7.33‒1.00×10³	‒	1.64‒195	‒	‒	ND‒90.5	1.17‒556	2.81‒841	杨俊等, 2019
袁河	ND‒ 156	ND‒ 38.6	ND‒ 7.95	ND‒ 203	ND	ND‒ 0.870	‒	‒	ND	ND	ND‒ 0.870	李佳乐等, 2022
赛里木湖	ND‒ 15.9	‒	ND	ND‒ 15.9	ND‒ 5.90	‒	‒	‒	ND	ND‒ 10.7	ND‒ 16.6	张亚茹等, 2021
辽河	‒	‒	ND‒4.60	ND‒4.60	ND‒49.3	‒	‒	‒	ND‒23.7	ND‒83.8	ND‒436	张晓娇等, 2017
本研究	‒	ND‒158	ND‒3.78	ND‒162	ND‒41.9	ND‒384	ND‒27.5	ND‒46.3	ND‒36.7	ND‒42.7	ND‒580

名称	TCs				QNs							参考文献
名称	CTC	DC	TC	TCsum	ENR	OFL	LOM	FLU	CIP	NOR	QNsum	参考文献
黄浦江	‒ ¹⁾	‒	15.1‒113	15.1‒113	ND²⁾	ND‒6.50	‒	‒	ND‒2.70	ND‒2.60	ND‒11.8	Jiang et al., 2011
珠江	ND‒33.0	‒	ND‒349	ND‒382	‒	ND‒703	‒	ND‒463	ND‒91.8	ND‒54.2	ND‒1.31×10³	Li et al., 2019
青狮潭	‒	‒	‒	‒	4.59‒6.06	50.0‒660	‒	‒	3.49‒6.22	3.70‒5.00	61.8‒677	莫苑敏等, 2019
清河	‒	‒	‒	‒	3.10‒ 6.30	6.40‒3.14×10³	‒	‒	35.8‒ 672	‒	45.3‒3.82×10³	高丽等, 2014
浑河	‒	‒	ND‒ 10.1	ND‒ 10.1	ND‒ 4.40	ND‒ 32.1	‒	‒	ND‒ 14.2	‒	ND‒50.7	卢正山, 2020
苏州市	‒	3.27‒454	4.06‒547	7.33‒1.00×10³	‒	1.64‒195	‒	‒	ND‒90.5	1.17‒556	2.81‒841	杨俊等, 2019
袁河	ND‒ 156	ND‒ 38.6	ND‒ 7.95	ND‒ 203	ND	ND‒ 0.870	‒	‒	ND	ND	ND‒ 0.870	李佳乐等, 2022
赛里木湖	ND‒ 15.9	‒	ND	ND‒ 15.9	ND‒ 5.90	‒	‒	‒	ND	ND‒ 10.7	ND‒ 16.6	张亚茹等, 2021
辽河	‒	‒	ND‒4.60	ND‒4.60	ND‒49.3	‒	‒	‒	ND‒23.7	ND‒83.8	ND‒436	张晓娇等, 2017
本研究	‒	ND‒158	ND‒3.78	ND‒162	ND‒41.9	ND‒384	ND‒27.5	ND‒46.3	ND‒36.7	ND‒42.7	ND‒580

项目	抗生素名称缩写
项目	DC	TC	CIP	DIF	ENR	FLU	LOM	NOR	OFL
ρ_n/(ng∙L⁻¹)	131	5.00×10³	5.00×10³	4.35×10⁵	49.0	2.84×10⁴	19.9	16.0	1.08×10³

成都市河流中四环素、喹诺酮类抗生素污染特征及生态风险评价

Pollution Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment of Tetracycline and Quinolone Antibiotics in Rivers of Chengdu

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 39

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

流域	抗生素风险熵
流域	DC	TC	CIP	DIF	ENR	FLU	LOM	NOR	OFL	RQ_sum
濛阳河	0.0260	0.00	0.00	‒	0.0582	0.00	0.0321	0.0575	4.6×10⁻³	0.179
毗河	‒ ¹⁾	0.00	0.00	‒	－	0.00	‒	‒	1.48×10⁻²	0.0152
西江河	0.0150	0.00	0.00	‒	0.0371	0.00	‒	0.0237	2.10×10⁻³	0.0785
府河	‒	0.00	‒	‒	‒	0.00	‒	0.0200	0.131	0.151
蒲江河	0.0240	0.00	‒	‒	‒	0.00	‒	‒	9.00×10⁻⁴	0.0252

[1]	陈鸿展, 区晖, 叶四化, 张倩华, 周树杰, 麦磊. 珠江广州段水体微塑料的时空分布特征及生态风险评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(9): 1663-1672.
[2]	黄世聪, 陈丽珂, 张政杰, 陈科华, 陈澄宇, 曾巧云. 四环素对不同品种蔬菜毒性阈值及其敏感性分布[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(11): 1988-1995.
[3]	施建飞, 靳正忠, 周智彬, 王鑫. 额尔齐斯河流域典型尾矿库区周边土壤重金属污染评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(5): 1015-1023.
[4]	李喆, 陈圣宾, 陈芝阳. 地表温度与土地利用类型间的空间尺度依赖性——以成都为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(5): 999-1007.
[5]	谢邵文, 郭晓淞, 杨芬, 黄强, 陈曼佳, 魏兴琥, 刘承帅. 广州市城市公园土壤重金属累积特征、形态分布及其生态风险[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(11): 2206-2215.
[6]	汪进, 韩智勇, 冯燕, 周若昕, 王双超. 成都市工业区绿地土壤重金属形态分布特征及生态风险评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(9): 1923-1932.
[7]	余楚, 李剑锋, 吕敦玉. 大兴安岭南段某矿区河流表层沉积物重金属污染及风险评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(11): 2223-2231.