间伐对亚热带马尾松人工林碳动态及碳固定经济价值的影响

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.08.001

生态环境学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 1499-1509.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.08.001

• 研究论文 • 下一篇

间伐对亚热带马尾松人工林碳动态及碳固定经济价值的影响

程传鹏¹^,²(), 徐明洁²^,³, 刘慧峰¹^,^*()

1.河南财经政法大学,河南郑州 450046
2.中国科学院千烟洲亚热带森林生态系统观测研究站,江西吉安 343700
3.沈阳农业大学农学院,辽宁沈阳 110866

收稿日期:2022-03-15 出版日期:2022-08-18 发布日期:2022-10-10
通讯作者: * 刘慧峰,讲师,博士。E-mail: liuhuifeng08@163.com
作者简介:程传鹏（1988年生）,男,讲师,博士,主要从事森林生态学和生态经济学方面研究。E-mail: chengpeng4@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42175141);河南省哲学社会科学规划年度项目(2020CJJ079)

Effects of Thinning on Carbon Dynamics and Economic Value of Carbon Fixation in Subtropical Pinus massoniana Plantation

CHENG Chuanpeng¹^,²(), XU Mingjie²^,³, LIU Huifeng¹^,^*()

1. Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou 450046, P. R. China
2. Qianyanzhou Ecological Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ji’an 343700,P. R. China
3. College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, P. R. China

Received:2022-03-15 Online:2022-08-18 Published:2022-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

森林兼具资源与环境双重属性,在调控全球碳循环、减缓气候变暖、促进社会经济可持续发展方面起着重要作用。碳交易背景下,对人工林实施间伐管理将对生态系统碳动态及碳固定经济价值产生显著的影响。为研究间伐对人工林碳动态及碳固定经济价值的影响,准确掌握人工林森林生态系统碳动态组分对间伐的响应,以亚热带马尾松（Pinus massoniana Lamb.）人工林为研究对象,于2014年12月—2016年12月开展间伐30%（密度）后生态系统碳动态组分野外观测与模拟以及在3种碳价格（1200元、150美元和34.38元）情境下碳固定经济价值评估。结果表明：间伐后森林生态系统碳汇功能显著降低,间伐后第一年甚至由碳汇转变为微弱的碳源,林下植被碳排放及伐桩呼吸碳排放升高是导致这一结果的主要原因;随后其碳汇功能迅速恢复,间伐后第二年恢复至70.0%,乔木层碳排放降低和林下植被碳排放及伐桩呼吸碳排放升高在这一过程中发挥了重要作用。间伐对森林环境因素、土壤养分、植物竞争关系等的影响,显著改变了亚热带人工马尾松林生态系统碳动态组分,并共同影响了生态系统碳动态和碳固定能力。碳价格显著影响生态系统碳固定经济价值,在上述3种碳价格情境下第一年和第二年间伐后生态系统碳固定经济价值分别减少7647.27、5869.28、219.09 yuan∙hm^-2和1623.75、1246.23、46.53 yuan∙hm^-2,计算间伐获得木材经济收益则可弥补因碳汇功能降低导致的碳固定经济价值损失。研究结果对于细化研究生态系统碳动态实测方法和综合评估生态系统碳固定经济价值具有重要作用,也对完善碳交易市场提出了更高的要求。

关键词: 间伐, 碳动态, 碳固定, 经济价值, 马尾松, 亚热带

Abstract:

Forests are important natural resources and have important ecological and economic values, which play an important role in regulating the global carbon cycle, mitigating climate warming and promoting sustainable social and economic development. In the context of carbon trading, thinning management of plantations could greatly affect carbon sequestration and the corresponding economic value. To study the effects of thinning on carbon dynamics and the economic value of carbon sequestration and accurately understand the response of forest ecosystem carbon dynamics to thinning, we conducted field observations and simulations of ecosystem carbon dynamic components after 30% (density) thinning in subtropical Pinus massoniana plantations from December 2014 to December 2016 and evaluated the economic value of ecosystem carbon fixation under three carbon price scenarios (1200 yuan, 150 US dollars and 34.38 yuan). The results showed that the carbon sink function of the forest ecosystem decreased significantly after thinning and even changed from a carbon sink to a weak carbon source in the first year after thinning. The increase in the carbon emissions of understory vegetation and stump respiration were the main reasons for this result. Subsequently, the forest ecosystem carbon sink function recovered rapidly and recovered to 70.0% in the second year after thinning. The decrease in the carbon emissions of the tree layer and the increase in the carbon emissions of the understory vegetation and stump respiration played an important role in this process. The effects of thinning on forest environmental factors, soil nutrients and plant competition significantly changed the carbon dynamic components of the subtropical Pinus massoniana plantation and together affected the carbon dynamics and carbon fixation capacity of the ecosystem. The changes in understory vegetation carbon emissions and stump respiration carbon emissions played an important role in this change. The carbon price significantly affected the economic value of ecosystem carbon fixation after thinning, which decreased by 7647.27 yuan∙hm^-2, 5869.28 yuan∙hm^-2, and 219.09 yuan∙hm^-2 and 1623.75 yuan∙hm^-2, 1246.23 yuan∙hm^-2, and 46.53 yuan∙hm^-2, respectively. The loss of economic value of carbon fixation caused by the reduction in the carbon sink function can be compensated for by calculating the economic benefit of wood obtained from thinning. The research results play an important role in refining the measurement methods of ecosystem carbon dynamics and comprehensively evaluating the economic value of ecosystem carbon fixation and put forward higher requirements for improving the carbon trading market.

Key words: thinning, carbon dynamics, carbon fixation, economic value, Pinus massoniana, subtropical

中图分类号:

F062.2
X196

程传鹏, 徐明洁, 刘慧峰. 间伐对亚热带马尾松人工林碳动态及碳固定经济价值的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(8): 1499-1509.

CHENG Chuanpeng, XU Mingjie, LIU Huifeng. Effects of Thinning on Carbon Dynamics and Economic Value of Carbon Fixation in Subtropical Pinus massoniana Plantation[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(8): 1499-1509.

图/表 7

参考文献 41

[1]	ACUNA M, NAVARRO-CERRILLO R M, RUIZ-GÓMEZ F, et al., 2021. How does carbon pricing impact optimal thinning schedules and net present value in Mediterranean pine plantations?[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 482: 118847. DOI URL
[2]	AUN K, KUKMÄGI M, VARIK M, et al., 2021a. Short-term effect of thinning on the carbon budget of young and middle-aged silver birch (Betula pendula Roth) stands[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 480: 118660. DOI URL
[3]	AUN K, KUKMÄGI M, VARIK M, et al., 2021b. Short-term effect of thinning on the carbon budget of young and middle-aged Scots pine (Pinussylvestris L.) stands[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 492: 119241. DOI URL
[4]	AUSTIN K G, BAKER J S, SOHNGEN B L, et al., 2020. The economic costs of planting, preserving, and managing the world’s forests to mitigate climate change[J]. Nature communications, 11(1): 5946. DOI URL
[5]	BAUTISTA I, LIDÓM A, LULLl C, et al., 2021. Thinning decreased soil respiration differently intwo dryland Mediterranean forests with contrasted soil temperature andhumidity regimes[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 140(6): 1469-1485. DOI URL
[6]	CHEN S, SHAHI C, CHEN H Y H, et al., 2017. Economic analysis of forest management alternatives: Compositional objectives, rotation ages, and harvest methods in boreal forests[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 85(Part 1):124-134. DOI URL
[7]	CHENG C P, WANG Y D, FU X L, et al., 2017. Thinning effect on understory community and photosynthetic characteristics in a subtropical Pinus massoniana plantation[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 47(8): 1104-1115. DOI URL
[8]	CHENG X Q, HAN H R, ZHU J, et al., 2021. Forest thinning and organic matter manipulation drives changes in soil respiration in a Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation in China[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 211: 104996.
[9]	CHIANG J M, BROWN K J, 2010. The effects of thinning and burning treatments on within-canopy variation of leaf traits in hardwood forests of southern Ohio[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 260(6): 1065-1075. DOI URL
[10]	EGGERS J, RÄTY M, ÖHMAN K, et al., 2020. How well do stakeholder-defined forest management scenarios balance economic and ecological forest values?[J]. Forests, DOI: 10.3390/f11010086. DOI
[11]	ENRÍQUEZ-DE-SALAMANCA Á, 2021. Carbon versus timber economy in Mediterranean forests[J]. Atmosphere, 12(6): 746. DOI URL
[12]	FÖRSTER AGNES, CULMSEE H, LEYSCHNER C, 2021. Thinned northern German Scots pine forests have a low carbon storage and uptake potential in comparison to naturally developing beech forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 479: 118575. DOI URL
[13]	GONG C, TAN Q Y, LIU G B, et al., 2021. Forest thinning increases soil carbon stocks in China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 482: 118812. DOI URL
[14]	LINDGREN P M F, SULLIVAN T P, 2013. Long-term response of tree and stand growth of young lodgepole pine to pre-commercial thinning and repeated fertilization[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 307: 155-164. DOI URL
[15]	LINDROTH A, HOLST J, HELIASZ M, et al., 2018. Effects of low thinning on carbon dioxide fluxes in a mixed hemiboreal forest[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 262: 59-70. DOI URL
[16]	LULL C, BAUTISTA I, LIDON A, et al., 2020. Temporal effects of thinning on soil organic carbon pools, basal respiration and enzyme activities in a Mediterranean Holm oak forest[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118088. DOI
[17]	PIAO S L, FANG J Y, CIAIS P, et al., 2009. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China[J]. Nature, 458: 1009-1013. DOI URL
[18]	TAYE F A, FOLKERSEN M V, FLEMING C M, et al., 2021. The economic values of global forest ecosystem services: A meta-analysis[J]. Ecological Economics, 189: 107145. DOI URL
[19]	VICCARO M, COZZI M, FANELLI L, et al., 2019. Spatial modelling approach to evaluate the economic impacts of climate change on forests at a local scale[J]. Ecological Indicators, 106: 105523. DOI URL
[20]	WANG J L, WANG H M, FU X L, et al., 2016. Effects of site preparation treatments before afforestation on soil carbon release[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 361: 277-285. DOI URL
[21]	WANG W W, PAGE-DUMROESE D, JURGENSEN M, et al., 2018. Effect of forest thinning and wood quality on the short-term wood decomposition rate in a Pinus tabuliformis plantation[J]. Journal of Plant Research, 131(6): 897-905. DOI URL
[22]	XU M J, HU J, ZHANG T, et al., 2021. Specific responses of canopy conductance to environmental factors in a coniferous plantation in subtropical China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 131: 108168. DOI URL
[23]	XU M J, WEN X F, WANG H M, et al., 2014. Effects of Climatic Factors and Ecosystem Responses on the Inter-Annual Variability of Evapotranspiration in a Coniferous Plantation in Subtropical China[J]. PLOS ONE, 9(1): e85593. DOI URL
[24]	ZANCHI G, BRADY M V, 2019. Evaluating the contribution of forest ecosystem services to societal welfare through linking dynamic ecosystem modelling with economic valuation[J]. Ecosystem Services, 39: 101011. DOI URL
[25]	国家林业和草原局, 2019. 中国森林资源报告(2014- 2018)[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社: 2-9.
	National Forestry and Grassland Administration, 2019. CHINA FOREST RESOURCES REPORT (2014-2018)[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House: 2-9.
[26]	国家林业局, 2008. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范:LY/T 1721-2008[M]. 北京: 中国标准出版社: 1-4.
	National Forestry Administration, 2008. Specifications for assessment of forest ecosystem services in China:LY/T 1721-2008[M]. Beijing: Standards Press of China: 1-4.
[27]	胡原, 曾维忠, 2020. 碳汇造林项目促进了当地经济发展吗?--基于四川县域面板数据的PSM-DID实证研究[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 30(2): 89-98.
	HU Y, ZENG W Z, 2020. Does the carbon sink afforestation project promote local economic development?[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 30(2): 89-98.
[28]	李瑞霞, 马洪靖, 闵建刚, 等, 2012. 间伐对马尾松人工林林下植物多样性的短期和长期影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 21(5): 807-812.
	LI R X, MA H J, MIN J G, et al., 2012. Short-term and long-term effects of thinning on the undergrowth diversity in the Pinusmassoniana plantation[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 21(5): 807-812.
[29]	李轩然, 刘琪璟, 蔡哲, 等, 2007. 千烟洲针叶林的比叶面积及叶面积指数[J]. 植物生态学报, 31(1): 93-101.
	LI X R, LIU Q J, CAI Z, et al., 2007. Specific leaf area and leaf area index of conifer plantations in Qianyanzhou station of subtropical China[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 31(1): 93-101.
[30]	马浩然, 赵天忠, 2021. 森林生态效益补偿研究进展与展望[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 20(4): 90-99.
	MA H Z, ZHAO T Z, 2021. Research of forest ecological benefit compensation: Progress and prospect[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Sciences), 20(4): 90-99.
[31]	马泽清, 王辉民, 杨风亭, 等, 2020. 基于长期观测研究支撑亚热带红壤丘陵区森林生态系统恢复与可持续发展[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 35(12): 1525-1536.
	MA Z Q, WANG H M, YANG F T, et al., 2020. Ecological restoration and sustainable development of forest ecosystem in subtropical red soil hilly region based on long-term observation and research[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 35(12): 1525-1536.
[32]	梅梦媛, 雷一东, 2019. 我国人工林新时代发展形势分析[J]. 世界林业研究, 32(3): 73-77.
	MEI M Y, LEI Y D, 2019. Analysis on development trend of china’s plantation in new era[J]. World Forestry Research, 32(3): 73-77.
[33]	王小玲, 沈月琴, 朱臻, 2013. 考虑碳汇收益的林地期望值最大化及其敏感性分析--以杉木和马尾松为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 37(4): 143-148.
	WANG X L, SHEN Y Q, ZHU Z, 2013. The maximization of land expectation value (LEV) considering carbon benefits and its sensitivity analysis: Take Chinese fir and Masson pine for example[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 37(4): 143-148.
[34]	谢聪, 徐晋涛, 2020. 森林社会经济效益问题探讨[J]. 世界林业研究, 33(3): 101-106.
	XIE C, XU J T, 2020. A discussion on forest socioeconomic benefit[J]. World Forestry Research, 33(3): 101-106.
[35]	薛蓓蓓, 田国双, 2021. 基于碳汇木材复合经营目标的综合效益及影响因素分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 45(2): 205-212.
	XUE B B, TIAN G S, 2021. Analysis of comprehensive benefits and influencing factors based on the combined economic value of carbon sequestration and timber benefits[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 45(2): 205-212.
[36]	杨博文, 2021. 习近平新发展理念下碳达峰、碳中和目标战略实现的系统思维、经济理路与科学路径[J]. 经济学家(9): 5-12.
	YANG B W, 2021. The systematic thinking, economic logic and scientific path for the realization of carbon summit and carbon neutral target strategy under Xi Jinping’s new development concept[J]. Economist, (9): 5-12.
[37]	杨尚东, 吴俊, 谭宏伟, 等, 2014. 南方红壤区西南桦和马尾松人工林土壤微生物活性及细菌多样性比较[J]. 生态环境学报, 23(3): 415-422.
	YANG S D, WU J, TAN H W, et al., 2014. Comparison on soil microbial activities and bacterial diversity between Betula alnoides and Pinus massoniana plantations in red soil region, China[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 23(3): 415-422.
[38]	张春华, 居为民, 王登杰, 等, 2018. 2004-2013年山东省森林碳储量及其碳汇经济价值[J]. 生态学报, 38(5): 1739-1749.
	ZHANG C H, JU W M, WANG D J, et al., 2018. Biomass carbon stocks and economic value dynamics of forests in Shandong Province from 2004 to 2013 [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(5): 1739-1749.
[39]	张峰, 彭祚登, 2021. 北京市森林碳储量和碳汇经济价值研究[J]. 林业资源管理, (6): 52-58.
	ZHANG F, PENG Z D, 2021. Biomass carbon stocks and carbon stock economic value of forests in Beijing[J]. Forest Resources Management, (6): 52-58.
[40]	张娟, 陈钦, 2021. 森林碳汇经济价值评估研究--以福建省为例[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 43(5): 121-128.
	ZHANG J, CHEN Q, 2021. Study on economic value assessment of forest carbon sequestration[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 43(5): 121-128.
[41]	朱梅钰, 龙飞, 祁慧博, 等, 2021. 基于行业减排的森林碳汇需求空间测度与分类[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 38(2): 377-386.
	ZHU M Y, LONG F, QI H B, 2021. Spatial measurement and classification of forest carbon sink demand based on industry emission reduction[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 38(2): 377-386.

项目 Item	2015		2016
项目 Item	对照Unthinned	T₂₀₁₄	对照Unthinned	T₂₀₁₄
生态系统碳吸收Ecosystem carbon uptake(by C)/(g∙m^-2∙a^-1)	-2313.87±77.91a	-1843.98±6.91b	-3061.80±70.50a	-2274.42±42.00b
生态系统碳排放Ecosystem carbon emissions(by C)/(g∙m^-2∙a^-1)	1621.84±78.42a	1658.36±7.27a	2420.00±20.38b	1604.47±39.40a
生态系统碳动态Ecosystem carbon dynamics(by C)/(g∙m^-2∙a^-1)	-455.21±30.90a	182.06±6.08b	-409.96±16.79a	-274.65±7.63b

项目 Item	2015		2016
项目 Item	对照Unthinned	T₂₀₁₄	对照Unthinned	T₂₀₁₄
生态系统碳吸收Ecosystem carbon uptake(by C)/(g∙m^-2∙a^-1)	-2313.87±77.91a	-1843.98±6.91b	-3061.80±70.50a	-2274.42±42.00b
生态系统碳排放Ecosystem carbon emissions(by C)/(g∙m^-2∙a^-1)	1621.84±78.42a	1658.36±7.27a	2420.00±20.38b	1604.47±39.40a
生态系统碳动态Ecosystem carbon dynamics(by C)/(g∙m^-2∙a^-1)	-455.21±30.90a	182.06±6.08b	-409.96±16.79a	-274.65±7.63b

项目 Item	2015		2016
项目 Item	对照 Unthinned	T₂₀₁₄	对照 Unthinned	T₂₀₁₄
乔木层碳吸收 Carbon fixation of tree layer/kg	-7450.67±298.62a	-5750.90±24.75b	-9635.55±268.07a	-7159.25±155.84b
林下植被碳吸收 Carbon fixation of understory community/kg	-930.17±12.85a	-909.33±14.41a	-1431.96±10.33a	-1062.26±2.80b
林下植被碳排放 Carbon emissions of understory community/kg	870.90±5.14a	1213.36±10.41b	963.04±5.07a	1304.49±9.24b
乔木层碳排放 Carbon emissions of tree layer/kg	3079.64±120.32b	2429.88±31.37a	5894.92±92.92b	2445.47±162.44a

项目 Item	2015		2016
项目 Item	对照 Unthinned	T₂₀₁₄	对照 Unthinned	T₂₀₁₄
乔木层碳吸收 Carbon fixation of tree layer/kg	-7450.67±298.62a	-5750.90±24.75b	-9635.55±268.07a	-7159.25±155.84b
林下植被碳吸收 Carbon fixation of understory community/kg	-930.17±12.85a	-909.33±14.41a	-1431.96±10.33a	-1062.26±2.80b
林下植被碳排放 Carbon emissions of understory community/kg	870.90±5.14a	1213.36±10.41b	963.04±5.07a	1304.49±9.24b
乔木层碳排放 Carbon emissions of tree layer/kg	3079.64±120.32b	2429.88±31.37a	5894.92±92.92b	2445.47±162.44a

项目 Item		对照 Unthinned	T₂₀₁₄
土层层次Soil layer/cm	土壤性质Soil property	对照 Unthinned	T₂₀₁₄
0-10	pH	4.22±0.02a	4.23±0.03a
	w_(NH4+-N)/(mg∙kg^-1)	8.15±0.34b	5.66±0.22a
	w_(NO3--N)/(mg∙kg^-1)	2.90±0.12b	1.53±0.08a
	w_{(inorganic N)}/(mg∙kg^-1)	11.05±0.22b	7.60±0.33a
10-20	pH	4.23±0.01a	4.21±0.02a
	w_(NH4+-N)/(mg∙kg^-1)	3.17±0.07a	3.38±0.21a
	w_(NO3--N)/(mg∙kg^-1)	1.28±0.12a	1.09±0.02a
	w_{(inorganic N)}/(mg∙kg^-1)	4.45±0.15a	4.46±0.18a
5 cm土壤湿度 Soil water content at 5 cm/(cm³∙cm^-3)		12.98±0.29a	13.90±0.22b
地表温度Surface temperature/℃		17.97±0.29a	18.58±0.29a
5 cm 土壤温度Soil temperature at 5 cm/℃		16.5±0.08a	17.21±0.33a
LAI Leaf area index		3.15±0.05b	2.56±0.15a
冠层开度Canopy openness/%		37.57±1.42a	44.45±1.80b
总太阳辐射透过率 Total solar radiation transmittance (T_tot)/%		37.94±1.10a	55.15±1.53b
直接太阳辐射透过率 Direct solar radiation transmittance (T_dir)/%		35.43±0.83a	55.20±1.09b
散射太阳辐射透过率 Diffuse solar radiation transmittance (T_dif)/%		35.43±1.37a	55.10±1.97b

间伐对亚热带马尾松人工林碳动态及碳固定经济价值的影响

Effects of Thinning on Carbon Dynamics and Economic Value of Carbon Fixation in Subtropical Pinus massoniana Plantation

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 41

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李勋, 崔宁洁, 张艳, 覃宇, 张健. 马尾松与乡土阔叶树种凋落叶纤维素、总酚以及缩合单宁降解的混合效应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(9): 1813-1822.
[2]	张博文, 秦娟, 任忠明, 陈子齐, 姚舜佳, 刘烨, 宋炎玉. 坡向对北亚热带区马尾松纯林及不同针阔混交林型林下植物多样性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(6): 1091-1100.
[3]	陈丽娟, 周文君, 易艳芸, 宋清海, 张一平, 梁乃申, 鲁志云, 温韩东, MOHD Zeeshan, 沙丽清. 云南哀牢山亚热带常绿阔叶林土壤CH₄通量特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(5): 949-960.
[4]	温智峰, 魏识广, 李林, 叶万辉, 练琚愉. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林植物不同分类水平上的空间分布格局及空间关联[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(3): 440-450.
[5]	杨世福, 马玲玲, 陈芸芝, 唐旭利. 鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林演替系列土壤细菌群落的变化特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(12): 2275-2282.
[6]	张天霖, 蔡章林, 赵厚本, 吴仲民, 周光益, 邱治军. ¹³C脉冲标记法研究非正常凋落物对土壤有机碳的激发效应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(9): 1797-1804.
[7]	王玄, 熊鑫, 张慧玲, 赵梦頔, 胡明慧, 褚国伟, 孟泽, 张德强. 模拟酸雨对南亚热带森林凋落物分解和土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(9): 1805-1813.
[8]	洪文君, 莫罗坚, 张浩. 华南地区马占相思人工林不同改造模式对林分结构的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(7): 1360-1367.
[9]	张健, 徐明, 王阳, 文春玉, 杨云礼, 张姣, 聂坤. 黔中地区不同马尾松群丛土壤球囊霉素分布特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(12): 2303-2308.
[10]	张洋洋, 周清慧, 许骄阳, 魏鸣, 陈继豪, 何伟, 王鹏程, 晏召贵. 林龄对马尾松人工林林下植物与土壤种子库多样性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(11): 2121-2129.