Ecology and Environmental Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 748-759.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.05.008
• Research Article [Ecology] • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIN Yaoben1,2(
), WANG Dong3, WANG Xinliang4,*(
)
Received:2025-08-30
Revised:2026-01-19
Accepted:2026-02-13
Online:2026-05-18
Published:2026-05-08
通讯作者:
*E-mail: 作者简介:林耀奔(1991年生),男,副教授,博士,硕士研究生导师,主要研究方向为耕地生态与区域可持续发展。E-mail: lyb@njtech.edu.cn
基金资助:CLC Number:
LIN Yaoben, WANG Dong, WANG Xinliang. Spatial Differentiation of Paddy Soil Micro-ecological Environments and Their Influencing Factors in the Yellow River Irrigation District[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(5): 748-759.
林耀奔, 汪栋, 王心良. 引黄灌区水田土壤微生态环境空间分异及其影响因素研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(5): 748-759.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.05.008
| 灌区 | 样点 | w(水分)/% | pH | w(有机质)/(g·kg−1) | w(有效磷)/(mg·kg−1) | w(速效钾)/(mg·kg−1) | w(全氮)/(g·kg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 十八户 | B01-04 | 26.3±2.7a | 7.32±0.17a | 45.5±15.3a | 84.0±33.5a | 29.3±8.5ab | 2.47±0.40a |
| 曹店 | C01-04 | 21.7±3.1b | 7.29±0.12a | 31.0±10.4b | 45.5±17.5b | 30.9±10.5ab | 1.57±0.20b |
| 东水源 | D01-04 | 27.2±4.0a | 7.41±0.11ab | 42.4±13.7a | 69.6±18.6ab | 27.5±5.8ab | 2.27±0.35ab |
| 官家 | G01-04 | 22.8±2.5b | 7.44±0.15ab | 31.7±13.3b | 75.1±19.1ab | 27.7±7.6ab | 1.71±0.23b |
| 双河 | H01-04 | 24.5±4.1ab | 7.38±0.22ab | 45.6±12.0a | 62.8±14.6ab | 30.6±11.5ab | 2.11±0.29ab |
| 垦东 | K01-04 | 23.7±2.9b | 7.59±0.13ab | 37.5±14.8ab | 35.9±8.7b | 35.9±10.5a | 2.11±0.31ab |
| 路庄 | L01-04 | 17.9±3.8c | 8.02±0.11b | 28.6±9.6b | 48.2±11.3b | 20.6±5.5b | 1.52±0.16b |
| 麻湾 | M01-04 | 18.2±2.7c | 7.58±0.17ab | 29.8±13.3b | 60.8±10.4ab | 34.8±9.0ab | 1.39±0.13b |
| 五七 | Q01-04 | 26.8±3.2a | 7.36±0.18ab | 44.6±13.0a | 40.5±7.3ab | 27.1±6.9ab | 2.43±0.12ab |
| 胜利 | S01-04 | 19.1±2.5bc | 7.64±0.10ab | 40.5±10.3ab | 72.2±15.5ab | 35.5±8.9a | 2.22±0.18ab |
| 王庄 | W01-04 | 27.3±2.9ab | 7.47±0.16ab | 50.3±12.4a | 29.6±10.8b | 28.5±7.7ab | 2.23±0.13ab |
| 一号 | Y01-04 | 28.6±4.1a | 7.32±0.20ab | 55.3±14.4a | 104.6±22.7a | 32.5±9.2a | 2.72±0.43a |
Table 1 Spatial differences in fundamental physicochemical properties of soils in the irrigation area
| 灌区 | 样点 | w(水分)/% | pH | w(有机质)/(g·kg−1) | w(有效磷)/(mg·kg−1) | w(速效钾)/(mg·kg−1) | w(全氮)/(g·kg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 十八户 | B01-04 | 26.3±2.7a | 7.32±0.17a | 45.5±15.3a | 84.0±33.5a | 29.3±8.5ab | 2.47±0.40a |
| 曹店 | C01-04 | 21.7±3.1b | 7.29±0.12a | 31.0±10.4b | 45.5±17.5b | 30.9±10.5ab | 1.57±0.20b |
| 东水源 | D01-04 | 27.2±4.0a | 7.41±0.11ab | 42.4±13.7a | 69.6±18.6ab | 27.5±5.8ab | 2.27±0.35ab |
| 官家 | G01-04 | 22.8±2.5b | 7.44±0.15ab | 31.7±13.3b | 75.1±19.1ab | 27.7±7.6ab | 1.71±0.23b |
| 双河 | H01-04 | 24.5±4.1ab | 7.38±0.22ab | 45.6±12.0a | 62.8±14.6ab | 30.6±11.5ab | 2.11±0.29ab |
| 垦东 | K01-04 | 23.7±2.9b | 7.59±0.13ab | 37.5±14.8ab | 35.9±8.7b | 35.9±10.5a | 2.11±0.31ab |
| 路庄 | L01-04 | 17.9±3.8c | 8.02±0.11b | 28.6±9.6b | 48.2±11.3b | 20.6±5.5b | 1.52±0.16b |
| 麻湾 | M01-04 | 18.2±2.7c | 7.58±0.17ab | 29.8±13.3b | 60.8±10.4ab | 34.8±9.0ab | 1.39±0.13b |
| 五七 | Q01-04 | 26.8±3.2a | 7.36±0.18ab | 44.6±13.0a | 40.5±7.3ab | 27.1±6.9ab | 2.43±0.12ab |
| 胜利 | S01-04 | 19.1±2.5bc | 7.64±0.10ab | 40.5±10.3ab | 72.2±15.5ab | 35.5±8.9a | 2.22±0.18ab |
| 王庄 | W01-04 | 27.3±2.9ab | 7.47±0.16ab | 50.3±12.4a | 29.6±10.8b | 28.5±7.7ab | 2.23±0.13ab |
| 一号 | Y01-04 | 28.6±4.1a | 7.32±0.20ab | 55.3±14.4a | 104.6±22.7a | 32.5±9.2a | 2.72±0.43a |
| 灌区 | Cu | Cd | Pb | Cr | As | Hg | Ni | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 十八户 | 56.0±19.4a | 2.31±0.11ab | 41.8±9.6ab | 217.3±11.3a | 3.38±3.50a | 0.48±0.09a | 51.5±2.4a | 132.0±9.5ab |
| 曹店 | 36.0±7.5b | 2.05±0.36b | 38.1±11.6ab | 208.0±8.2a | 4.65±2.15a | 0.52±0.15a | 50.5±3.7a | 116.8±50.8ab |
| 东水源 | 45.3±7.8ab | 2.31±0.45ab | 36.9±13.6ab | 211.5±12.0a | 5.16±4.43a | 0.76±0.38a | 57.5±11.4a | 112.2±16.5b |
| 官家 | 39.0±6.9ab | 2.09±0.34ab | 38.4±7.9ab | 212.5±10.8a | 4.09±4.08a | 0.71±0.25a | 48.8±7.5a | 114.3±27.4b |
| 双河 | 43.0±6.6ab | 2.14±0.32ab | 41.6±8.1ab | 213.5±9.7a | 4.11±5.14a | 0.53±0.42a | 54.5±7.9a | 133.8±17.0ab |
| 垦东 | 40.5±6.1ab | 2.53±0.30a | 41.3±20.6ab | 216.5±15.9a | 1.97±0.87a | 0.51±0.06a | 52.8±7.5a | 112.1±13.4b |
| 路庄 | 40.3±6.8ab | 2.20±0.28ab | 34.9±4.2b | 208.8±14.9a | 2.48±3.24a | 0.37±0.19a | 55.5±8.1a | 97.6±24.9b |
| 麻湾 | 36.0±4.2b | 2.21±0.31ab | 31.4±4.4b | 209.0±7.1a | 3.58±4.91a | 0.41±0.17a | 58.5±8.1a | 102.8±10.8b |
| 五七 | 44.5±2.5ab | 2.30±0.31ab | 42.7±3.8ab | 220.8±9.3a | 3.36±2.15a | 0.46±0.07a | 49.5±9.5a | 118.0±10.9ab |
| 胜利 | 43.8±5.1ab | 2.19±0.25ab | 41.8±6.4ab | 215.0±12.5a | 7.45±3.76a | 0.49±0.25a | 57.3±10.4a | 119.8±18.0ab |
| 王庄 | 41.8±11.4ab | 2.26±0.47ab | 42.2±13.0ab | 224.0±13.7a | 2.11±1.66a | 0.44±0.26a | 58.0±3.2a | 123.0±29.3ab |
| 一号 | 39.8±14.9ab | 2.16±0.24ab | 39.2±8.7ab | 207.0±10.7a | 10.0±1.3b | 0.65±0.23a | 55.5±2.6a | 115.1±26.9b |
Table 2 Spatial differences in soil heavy metal concentrations in the irrigated area mg·kg?1
| 灌区 | Cu | Cd | Pb | Cr | As | Hg | Ni | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 十八户 | 56.0±19.4a | 2.31±0.11ab | 41.8±9.6ab | 217.3±11.3a | 3.38±3.50a | 0.48±0.09a | 51.5±2.4a | 132.0±9.5ab |
| 曹店 | 36.0±7.5b | 2.05±0.36b | 38.1±11.6ab | 208.0±8.2a | 4.65±2.15a | 0.52±0.15a | 50.5±3.7a | 116.8±50.8ab |
| 东水源 | 45.3±7.8ab | 2.31±0.45ab | 36.9±13.6ab | 211.5±12.0a | 5.16±4.43a | 0.76±0.38a | 57.5±11.4a | 112.2±16.5b |
| 官家 | 39.0±6.9ab | 2.09±0.34ab | 38.4±7.9ab | 212.5±10.8a | 4.09±4.08a | 0.71±0.25a | 48.8±7.5a | 114.3±27.4b |
| 双河 | 43.0±6.6ab | 2.14±0.32ab | 41.6±8.1ab | 213.5±9.7a | 4.11±5.14a | 0.53±0.42a | 54.5±7.9a | 133.8±17.0ab |
| 垦东 | 40.5±6.1ab | 2.53±0.30a | 41.3±20.6ab | 216.5±15.9a | 1.97±0.87a | 0.51±0.06a | 52.8±7.5a | 112.1±13.4b |
| 路庄 | 40.3±6.8ab | 2.20±0.28ab | 34.9±4.2b | 208.8±14.9a | 2.48±3.24a | 0.37±0.19a | 55.5±8.1a | 97.6±24.9b |
| 麻湾 | 36.0±4.2b | 2.21±0.31ab | 31.4±4.4b | 209.0±7.1a | 3.58±4.91a | 0.41±0.17a | 58.5±8.1a | 102.8±10.8b |
| 五七 | 44.5±2.5ab | 2.30±0.31ab | 42.7±3.8ab | 220.8±9.3a | 3.36±2.15a | 0.46±0.07a | 49.5±9.5a | 118.0±10.9ab |
| 胜利 | 43.8±5.1ab | 2.19±0.25ab | 41.8±6.4ab | 215.0±12.5a | 7.45±3.76a | 0.49±0.25a | 57.3±10.4a | 119.8±18.0ab |
| 王庄 | 41.8±11.4ab | 2.26±0.47ab | 42.2±13.0ab | 224.0±13.7a | 2.11±1.66a | 0.44±0.26a | 58.0±3.2a | 123.0±29.3ab |
| 一号 | 39.8±14.9ab | 2.16±0.24ab | 39.2±8.7ab | 207.0±10.7a | 10.0±1.3b | 0.65±0.23a | 55.5±2.6a | 115.1±26.9b |
| 灌区 | 群落丰富度指数 | 群落均匀度指数 | 群落多样性指数 | 群落覆盖度指数 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sobs指数 | Chao指数 | Shannon均匀度 | Simpson均匀度 | Shannon指数 | Invsimpson指数 | Coverage指数 | ||||
| 十八户 | 590.0±130.1a | 698.1±159.1a | 0.54±0.15c | 0.022±0.017c | 3.436±1.066b | 12.74±9.69b | 0.998±0.001a | |||
| 曹店 | 490.3±114.3bc | 551.0±193.1bc | 0.61±0.15bc | 0.056±0.066b | 3.738±1.002ab | 22.23±19.57ab | 0.9987±0.001a | |||
| 东水源 | 517.0±193.5bc | 594.2±241.0bc | 0.63±0.09ab | 0.046±0.042b | 3.72±0.88ab | 24.74±14.27ab | 0.9977±0.002a | |||
| 官家 | 548.3±290.4bc | 669.3±346.3bc | 0.48±0.20c | 0.019±0.011c | 2.37±1.58c | 10.41±8.12b | 0.9977±0.002a | |||
| 双河 | 553.3±115.3bc | 633.8±229.4bc | 0.74±0.03a | 0.065±0.056b | 4.13±1.2 ab | 34.03±24.15a | 0.9989±0.002a | |||
| 垦东 | 464.5±224.2bc | 517.2±236.8bc | 0.59±0.06bc | 0.022±0.023c | 3.00±0.56b | 15.53±7.43ab | 0.9980±0.001a | |||
| 路庄 | 514.3±82.3bc | 553.8±85.1bc | 0.65±0.09ab | 0.054±0.056b | 4.00±0.58ab | 28.72±29.69a | 0.9989±0.001a | |||
| 麻湾 | 425.3±190.4c | 493.5±199.2bc | 0.48±0.25c | 0.018±0.017c | 2.67±1.55b | 9.82±11.03b | 0.9984±0.001a | |||
| 五七 | 531.0±134.3bc | 639.7±138.9bc | 0.46±0.14c | 0.014±0.009c | 2.89±1.16b | 7.99±5.64b | 0.9978±0.002a | |||
| 胜利 | 551.8±31.2bc | 591.4±33.7bc | 0.63±0.04ab | 0.039±0.019b | 3.97±0.62ab | 27.48±11.28a | 0.9989±0.001a | |||
| 王庄 | 587.8±58.9bc | 664.1±106.8bc | 0.62±0.14ab | 0.041±0.029b | 3.90±1.12ab | 23.36±18.01ab | 0.9986±0.001a | |||
| 一号 | 674.7±52.4b | 720.1±83.2ab | 0.57±0.03bc | 0.021±0.006c | 3.76±0.27ab | 19.63±7.22ab | 0.9975±0.001a | |||
Table 3 Differences in soil fungal diversity metrics across the irrigated region
| 灌区 | 群落丰富度指数 | 群落均匀度指数 | 群落多样性指数 | 群落覆盖度指数 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sobs指数 | Chao指数 | Shannon均匀度 | Simpson均匀度 | Shannon指数 | Invsimpson指数 | Coverage指数 | ||||
| 十八户 | 590.0±130.1a | 698.1±159.1a | 0.54±0.15c | 0.022±0.017c | 3.436±1.066b | 12.74±9.69b | 0.998±0.001a | |||
| 曹店 | 490.3±114.3bc | 551.0±193.1bc | 0.61±0.15bc | 0.056±0.066b | 3.738±1.002ab | 22.23±19.57ab | 0.9987±0.001a | |||
| 东水源 | 517.0±193.5bc | 594.2±241.0bc | 0.63±0.09ab | 0.046±0.042b | 3.72±0.88ab | 24.74±14.27ab | 0.9977±0.002a | |||
| 官家 | 548.3±290.4bc | 669.3±346.3bc | 0.48±0.20c | 0.019±0.011c | 2.37±1.58c | 10.41±8.12b | 0.9977±0.002a | |||
| 双河 | 553.3±115.3bc | 633.8±229.4bc | 0.74±0.03a | 0.065±0.056b | 4.13±1.2 ab | 34.03±24.15a | 0.9989±0.002a | |||
| 垦东 | 464.5±224.2bc | 517.2±236.8bc | 0.59±0.06bc | 0.022±0.023c | 3.00±0.56b | 15.53±7.43ab | 0.9980±0.001a | |||
| 路庄 | 514.3±82.3bc | 553.8±85.1bc | 0.65±0.09ab | 0.054±0.056b | 4.00±0.58ab | 28.72±29.69a | 0.9989±0.001a | |||
| 麻湾 | 425.3±190.4c | 493.5±199.2bc | 0.48±0.25c | 0.018±0.017c | 2.67±1.55b | 9.82±11.03b | 0.9984±0.001a | |||
| 五七 | 531.0±134.3bc | 639.7±138.9bc | 0.46±0.14c | 0.014±0.009c | 2.89±1.16b | 7.99±5.64b | 0.9978±0.002a | |||
| 胜利 | 551.8±31.2bc | 591.4±33.7bc | 0.63±0.04ab | 0.039±0.019b | 3.97±0.62ab | 27.48±11.28a | 0.9989±0.001a | |||
| 王庄 | 587.8±58.9bc | 664.1±106.8bc | 0.62±0.14ab | 0.041±0.029b | 3.90±1.12ab | 23.36±18.01ab | 0.9986±0.001a | |||
| 一号 | 674.7±52.4b | 720.1±83.2ab | 0.57±0.03bc | 0.021±0.006c | 3.76±0.27ab | 19.63±7.22ab | 0.9975±0.001a | |||
| [1] |
ANGULO V, BLEICHRODT R J, DIJKSTERHUIS J, et al., 2024. Enhancement of soil aggregation and physical properties through fungal amendments under varying moisture conditions[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 26(5): e16627.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
BALU S K, ANDRA S, JEEVANANDAM J, et al., 2023. Exploring the potential of metal oxide nanoparticles as fungicides and plant nutrient boosters[J]. Crop Protection, 174: 106398.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
CHANDRAN S, LOGANATHACHETTI D S, SADAIAPPAN B, et al., 2025. Irrigation water and soil chemistry shape fungal guilds in date palm soils, enhancing pathotroph abundance under saline groundwater irrigation[J]. Current Research in Microbial Sciences, 8: 100370.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
CHERNYSHEVA E, KASHIRSKAYA N, DEMKINA E, et al., 2025. Organic grave good-related soil microorganisms: Read-out of soil biological memory for archaeological research[J]. Catena, 254: 108955.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
DU X P, BI Y L, TIAN L X, et al., 2024. Enhancing infiltration characteristics of compact soil in open-pit dumps through arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation in Amorpha fruticosa: Mechanisms and effects[J]. Catena, 247: 108515.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
EMMERLING C, HERZOG M, HOFFMANN C, et al., 2025. Operational soil warming by underground transmission lines impacts on soil microorganisms and related metabolic activities[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 188(3): 464-472.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
GARCIA-LOPEZ MT, MECA E, JAIME R, et al., 2024. Sporulation and dispersal of the biological control agent Aspergillus flavus AF36 under field conditions[J]. Phytopathology, 114(5): 1118-1125.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
HE M Y, SHEN C, PENG S, et al., 2024. The influence of soil salinization, induced by the backwater effect of the Yellow River, on microbial community dynamics and ecosystem functioning in arid regions[J]. Environmental Research, 262(Part 1): 119854.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
LIANG X Y, WANG H T, WANG C J, et al., 2023. Disentangling the impact of biogas slurry topdressing as a replacement for chemical fertilizers on soil bacterial and fungal community composition, functional characteristics, and co-occurrence networks[J]. Environmental Research, 238(2): 117256.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
MÄDER P, STACHE F, ENGELBART L, et al., 2024. Effects of MCPA and difenoconazole on glyphosate degradation and soil microorganisms[J]. Environmental Pollution, 362: 124926.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
PEREIRA G, CASTILLO-NOVALES D, SALAZAR C, et al., 2024. Gigaspora roseae and Coriolopsis rigida fungi improve performance of Quillaja saponaria plants grown in sandy substrate with added sewage sludge[J]. Journal of Fungi, 11(1): 1-16.
DOI URL |
| [12] | RICHARDS L, CREMIN K, COATES M, et al., 2024. Ammonia leakage can underpin nitrogen-sharing among soil microorganisms[J]. The ISME Journal, 18(1): wrae171. |
| [13] |
SARKER A, MASUD M, DEEPO D M, et al., 2023. Biological and green remediation of heavy metal contaminated water and soils: A state-of-the-art review[J]. Chemosphere, 332: 138861.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
TATSUMI C, TANIGUCHI T, HYODO F, et al., 2023. Mycorrhizal type affects forest nitrogen availability, independent of organic matter quality[J]. Biogeochemistry, 165(3): 327-340.
DOI |
| [15] |
WHALEN E D, GRANDY A S, GEYER K M, et al., 2024. Microbial trait multifunctionality drives soil organic matter formation potential[J]. Nature Communications, 15(1): 10209.
DOI |
| [16] |
XUE C Y, DU Y, ALLINSON G, et al., 2024. Metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons pollutants in industrial parks under valley landforms in Tibetan Plateau: Spatial pattern, ecological risk and interaction with soil microorganisms[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 471: 134411.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
YIALLOURIS A, PANA Z D, MARANGOS G, et al., 2024. Fungal diversity in the soil mycobiome: Implications for one health[J]. One Health, 18: 100720.
DOI URL |
| [18] | 陈彦云, 夏皖豫, 赵辉, 等, 2022. 粉垄耕作对耕地土壤酶活性、微生物群落结构和功能多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 42(12): 5009-5021. |
| CHEN Y Y, XIA W Y, ZHAO H, et al., 2022. Effects of pounded ridge tillage on soil enzyme activities, microbial community structure, and functional diversity in cultivated land[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(12): 5009-5021. | |
| [19] | 邓江茹, 刘文娟, 马琨, 等, 2024. 减氮和控释肥替代对宁夏引黄灌区玉米产量及土壤无机氮的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 49(3): 2069-2079. |
| DENG J R, LIU W J, MA K, et al., 2024. Effects of nitrogen reduction and controlled-release fertilizer substitution on maize yield and soil inorganic nitrogen in Yellow River Irrigation Districts of Ningxia[J]. Journal of Agro-Environmental Science, 49(3): 2069-2079. | |
| [20] | 杜运付, 伍金花, 高海健, 等, 2024. 菌根真菌修复重金属污染土壤研究进展[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 32(7): 1681-1692. |
| DU Y F, WU J H, GAO H J, et al., 2024. Advances in the remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils by mycorrhizal fungi[J]. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 32(7): 1681-1692. | |
| [21] |
高海燕, 张胜男, 杨制国, 等, 2025. 科尔沁沙地油松固沙林土壤真菌群落结构及功能[J]. 干旱区研究, 42(1): 118-126.
DOI |
| GAO H Y, ZHANG S N, YANG Z G, et al., 2025. Structure and function of soil fungal communities in Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica shelterbelt forests in Horqin Sandy Land[J]. Arid Zone Research, 42(1): 118-126. | |
| [22] | 郭海涛, 曹艳峰, 云秋皓, 2024. 汾河平原小麦成熟前期根际土丛枝菌根真菌群落结构的空间变异[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 38(5): 163-170. |
| GUO H T, CAO Y F, YUN Q H, 2024. Spatial variation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in wheat rhizosphere before maturity in the Fenhe Plain[J]. Arid Land Resources and Environment, 38(5): 163-170. | |
| [23] | 侯瑞楠, 崔钰爽, 王雨, 等, 2025. 河北省同纬度不同样地土壤盐分特征与微生物群落结构研究[J]. 微生物学报, 65(4): 1417-1432. |
| HOU R N, CUI Y S, WANG Y, et al., 2025. Characteristics of soil salinity and microbial community structure in different sites of the same latitude in Hebei Province[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 65(4): 1417-1432. | |
| [24] | 李常乐, 张富, 王理德, 等, 2024. 民勤绿洲退耕地土壤微生物群落结构与功能多样性特征[J]. 环境科学学报, 45(3): 1821-1829. |
| LI C L, ZHANG F, WANG L D, et al., 2024. Structure and functional diversity of soil microbial communities in abandoned farmland in Minqin Oasis[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 45(3): 1821-1829. | |
| [25] | 李劲, 程铭昊, 张溢, 等, 2025. 神农架国家公园不同植被类型土壤微生物群落结构及功能[J]. 生态学报, 45(10): 4842-4854. |
| LI J, CHENG M H, ZHANG Y, et al., 2025. Soil microbial community structure and function in different vegetation types of Shennongjia National Park[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 45(10): 4842-4854. | |
| [26] | 林曦照, 李星陆, 姜筱雨, 等, 2024. 放牧对中国北部草地土壤真菌群落组成和功能的影响: Meta分析[J]. 土壤学报, 61(6): 1755-1765. |
| LIN X Z, LI X L, JIANG X Y, et al., 2024. Effects of grazing on soil fungal community composition and function in northern Chinese grasslands: A meta-analysis[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 61(6): 1755-1765. | |
| [27] | 刘星, 邱慧珍, 王蒂, 等, 2015. 甘肃省中部沿黄灌区轮作和连作马铃薯根际土壤真菌群落的结构性差异评估[J]. 生态学报, 35(12): 3938-3948. |
| LIU X, QIU H Z, WANG D, et al., 2015. Structural differences of rhizosphere soil fungal communities between rotation and continuous potato cropping in central Gansu Yellow River irrigation area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(12): 3938-3948. | |
| [28] | 罗颖, 李敬伟, 袁浩, 等, 2023. 稀土-重金属共污染土壤中真菌群落结构特征及主导影响因素[J]. 环境科学, 44(9): 5145-5153. |
| LUO Y, LI J W, YUAN H, et al., 2023. Fungal community structure and key driving factors in soils co-contaminated by rare earth elements and heavy metals[J]. Environmental Science, 44(9): 5145-5153. | |
| [29] | 骆晓声, 寇长林, 张济世, 等, 2025. 炭基肥对麦-玉轮作农田土壤酶活性和真菌群落及作物产量的影响[J]. 环境科学, 46(6): 3965-3974. |
| LUO X S, KOU C L, ZHANG J S, et al., 2025. Effects of carbon-based fertilizer on soil enzyme activities, fungal communities and crop yield in wheat-maize rotation fields[J]. Environmental Science, 46(6): 3965-3974. | |
| [30] | 牟红霞, 张文文, 刘秉儒, 2021. 引黄灌区不同种植年限紫花苜蓿土壤真菌群落多样性特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 28(4): 91-96. |
| MU H X, ZHANG W W, LIU B R, 2021. Diversity characteristics of soil fungal communities in alfalfa with different planting years in Yellow River irrigation district[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 28(4): 91-96. | |
| [31] |
王燚, 李文珊, 展鹏飞, 等, 2024. 若尔盖高原泥炭沼泽土壤微生物空间分布[J]. 应用生态学报, 35(6): 1705-1715.
DOI |
|
WANG Y, LI W S, ZHAN P F, et al., 2024. Spatial distribution of peatland soil microorganisms on the Zoige Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 35(6): 1705-1715.
DOI |
|
| [32] | 姚瑶, 罗朋, 李京玲, 等, 2023. 基于VIKOR方法的引黄灌区土壤质量综合评价[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 37(6): 133-140. |
| YAO Y, LUO P, LI J L, et al., 2023. Comprehensive evaluation of soil quality in the Yellow River irrigation area based on the VIKOR method[J]. Arid Zone Research, 37(6): 133-140. | |
| [33] | 殷楠, 伊丽努尔·阿里甫江, 孙奥, 等, 2025. 东天山北坡工业带土壤重金属来源解析及健康风险评价[J]. 土壤通报, 56(3): 861-872. |
| YIN N, YILINUR·ALIFUJIANG, SUN A, et al., 2025. Source apportionment and health risk assessment of soil heavy metals in the industrial belt on the northern slope of the Eastern Tianshan Mountains[J]. Soil Bulletin, 56(3): 861-872. | |
| [34] |
余书捷, 沈蓉, 林敦梅, 2025. 外生菌根真菌对森林土壤有机质形成和分解的影响研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 36(3): 943-949.
DOI |
| YU S J, SHEN R, LIN D M, 2025. Progress in studies on the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on formation and decomposition of forest soil organic matter[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 36(3): 943-949. | |
| [35] |
张传华, 刘力, 代杰, 等, 2025. 基于土壤重金属污染和累积性评价的耕地环境质量类别划分与风险管控[J]. 生态环境学报, 34(2): 311-320.
DOI |
| ZHANG C H, LIU L, DAI J, et al., 2025. Classification and risk management of cultivated land environmental quality based on evaluation of soil heavy metal pollution and accumulation[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 34(2): 311-320. | |
| [36] | 张英, 曹红雨, 赵珮杉, 等, 2025. 半干旱-亚湿润干旱区樟子松林地土壤真菌群落随林龄增长的演变[J]. 环境科学, 46(6): 3975-3984. |
| ZHANG Y, CAO H Y, ZHAO P S, et al., 2025. Successional changes of soil fungal communities with increasing stand age in Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forests in semi-arid to sub-humid dry regions[J]. Environmental Science, 46(6): 3975-3984. |
| [1] | ZHAO Shuang, NIE Qianyu, YUE Ang, WANG Dongchuan, SUN Xiaowei, ZHANG Haotian, LIU Haotian, YE Kai. Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Cultivated Land Fragmentation in Typical Agricultural Regions of Northern China under Topographic-Economic Synergy [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(4): 642-653. |
| [2] | MU Haofeng, SONG Zhelu, GAO Zhen, HOU Ying, CHEN Weiping. Temporal Dynamics and Influencing Factors of Urban PM2.5 Pollution Risk Based on Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(2): 256-266. |
| [3] | SHI Hanzhi, CAO Yiran, LIU Fan, WU Zhichao, LI Furong, DENGTENG Haobo, XU Aiping, LI Dongqin, WEN Dian, WANG Xu. Study on the Regulation of Soil Lead Forms Transformation under the Combined Action of Straw and Bacteria [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(1): 155-166. |
| [4] | HAO Xiaoyan, DONG Chao, XUE Yang, HAN Liping. Symbiotic Effects and Influencing Factors of Energy Supply and Ecological Security in Energy Endowment Advantageous Areas [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(6): 974-985. |
| [5] | CHEN Jieru, YE Changsheng, WEI Wei, CAI Xin, WANG Lili. Analysis of “Production-Living-Ecological Space” Coupling Coordination and Influencing Factors in County Areas of Poyang Lake City Cluster [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(5): 807-818. |
| [6] | GUO Mingbin, GONG Jianzhou, WANG Lijuan, WANG Shikuan. Analysis of the Natural Dominant Factors Driving NO2 Concentration Changes in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area from 2019 to 2023 [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(4): 534-547. |
| [7] | WANG Chunmei, JIANG Bingqi, HU Jun, CHEN Daiwen, HUANG Lihua, CHENG Wanwan. Multi-scale Variations and Influencing Factors of Total Radioactivity in Atmospheric Environment Around Nuclear Power Plants [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(12): 1900-1908. |
| [8] | XIA Yining, LIU Peng’ao, HE Kerun, TIAN Chaohui, ZENG Liting, HOU Kelun. Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Scenario Simulations of Ecosystem Carbon Storage Based on Land Use Changes in the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan Metropolitan Area [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(11): 1661-1674. |
| [9] | ZHANG Weichen, WANG Xingqi, WANG Bojie. Spatiotemporal Pattern and Influencing Factors of the Ecosystem Services in the Tabu River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(7): 1142-1152. |
| [10] | LI Cheng, CHENG Zhipeng, LIU Yujin, YAO Yiming, LI Chunlei. Research on Ecological Risks and Its Control Policies of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(6): 980-996. |
| [11] | LI Rongjie, LI Huimei, WU Feifei, ZHAO mingde, WANG Shihan, SUN xueying. Study on the Spatial Differentiation Pattern and Driving Force of Ecosystem Services in Qinghai Lake Basin [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(2): 301-309. |
| [12] | LUO Xiaoling, LIU Jun, WANG Qi, LIU Tongxu, LIANG Yaojie, XIE Zhiyi, WANG Zhongwei, CHEN Duohong. Temporal and Spatial Changes in pH and Organic Matter and Their Influencing Factors in Soils with Various Land Use Types in Guangdong Province since 2016 [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(12): 1849-1861. |
| [13] | HE Ziqi, FANG Xi, HONG Yu. Influence of Plant Configuration on Sediment Size and the Removal of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Agricultural Drainage Ditches [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(11): 1727-1736. |
| [14] | YUAN Xi, FU Kaidao, TAO Yuchen, ZHANG Nian, YANG Lisha. Spatial-temporal Distribution and Influencing Factors of Nitrous Oxide Flux Across the Water-air Interface in Lancang River, China [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(1): 54-61. |
| [15] | LI Jianhui, DANG Zheng, CHEN Lin. Spatial-temporal Characteristics of PM2.5 and Its Influencing Factors in the Yellow River Jiziwan Metropolitan Area [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(4): 697-705. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn