Ecology and Environmental Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1234-1245.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.08.007
• Research Article [Ecology] • Previous Articles Next Articles
Wang Liyan1(
), Cao Wei1,2,*(
), Luo Yunjian1, Zhang Deshun2
Received:2026-01-12
Revised:2026-06-20
Accepted:2026-07-02
Online:2026-08-18
Published:2026-08-17
通讯作者:
E-mail: 作者简介:汪丽妍(2001年生),女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为城市绿地生态功能。E-mail: MZ120241550@stu.yzu.edu.cn
基金资助:CLC Number:
Wang Liyan, Cao Wei, Luo Yunjian, Zhang Deshun. Research on the Impact of Urban Blue and Green Spaces Landscape Pattern in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration on Ecological Utilization Efficiency[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(8): 1234-1245.
汪丽妍, 曹玮, 罗云建, 张德顺. 长三角城市群城市蓝绿空间景观格局对生态利用效率的影响研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(8): 1234-1245.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.08.007
| 数据类型 | 名称 | 分辨率 | 数据来源 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 土地利用数据 | 土地利用数据 | 10 m | 欧空局(ESA)发布的WorldCover数据( |
| 土壤数据 | 土壤数据 | 1 km | 世界土壤数据库(HWSD)( |
| 地形数据 | 数字高程模型 | 30 m | 中国科学院资源环境科学与数据平台( |
| 气象数据 | 年均降雨量、年均蒸散发 | 1 km | 中国科学院资源环境科学与数据平台( |
| 气温、湿度 | 1 km | 国家青藏高原科学数据中心( | |
| 社会经济数据 | 国内生产总值 | 1 km | 中国GDP空间分布公里网格数据集( |
| 人口密度 | 1 km | LandScan Global Program(landscan.ornl.gov) | |
| 夜间灯光指数 | 1 km | 国家青藏高原科学数据中心( |
Table 1 Data sources
| 数据类型 | 名称 | 分辨率 | 数据来源 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 土地利用数据 | 土地利用数据 | 10 m | 欧空局(ESA)发布的WorldCover数据( |
| 土壤数据 | 土壤数据 | 1 km | 世界土壤数据库(HWSD)( |
| 地形数据 | 数字高程模型 | 30 m | 中国科学院资源环境科学与数据平台( |
| 气象数据 | 年均降雨量、年均蒸散发 | 1 km | 中国科学院资源环境科学与数据平台( |
| 气温、湿度 | 1 km | 国家青藏高原科学数据中心( | |
| 社会经济数据 | 国内生产总值 | 1 km | 中国GDP空间分布公里网格数据集( |
| 人口密度 | 1 km | LandScan Global Program(landscan.ornl.gov) | |
| 夜间灯光指数 | 1 km | 国家青藏高原科学数据中心( |
| 指标类型 | 一级指标 | 二级指标 |
|---|---|---|
| 投入指标 | 土地投入 | 绿地空间面积占比/% |
| 水体空间面积占比.% | ||
| 产出指标 | 期望产出 | 年产水量/mm 总碳储量/(t∙hm−2) 土壤保持/(t∙km−2) 生境质量(0-1无量纲) 城市降温效应(0-1无量纲) 空气净化量/kg |
Table 2 Index system of ecological efficiency evaluation
| 指标类型 | 一级指标 | 二级指标 |
|---|---|---|
| 投入指标 | 土地投入 | 绿地空间面积占比/% |
| 水体空间面积占比.% | ||
| 产出指标 | 期望产出 | 年产水量/mm 总碳储量/(t∙hm−2) 土壤保持/(t∙km−2) 生境质量(0-1无量纲) 城市降温效应(0-1无量纲) 空气净化量/kg |
| 景观指数 | 绿地指数 | 水体指数 | 描述 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 斑块面积占比 | G_PLAND | W_PLAND | 绿色/蓝色空间斑块的百分比/% |
| 平均形状指数 | G_SHAPE_MN | W_SHAPE_MN | 斑块形状与相同面积的方形与圆形之间的偏离程度 |
| 景观形状指数 | G_LSI | W_LSI | 反映景观形状的复杂程度 |
| 平均斑块面积 | G_AREA_MN | W_AREA_MN | 绿色/蓝色空间斑块的平均大小/hm2 |
| 斑块聚集度 | G_AI | W_AI | 衡量绿地/水体斑块的聚集程度/% |
| 斑块连接度指数 | W_COHESION | W_COHESION | 反映绿地/水体斑块的自然连通程度/% |
Table 3 Selection of landscape pattern indicators for blue and green spaces
| 景观指数 | 绿地指数 | 水体指数 | 描述 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 斑块面积占比 | G_PLAND | W_PLAND | 绿色/蓝色空间斑块的百分比/% |
| 平均形状指数 | G_SHAPE_MN | W_SHAPE_MN | 斑块形状与相同面积的方形与圆形之间的偏离程度 |
| 景观形状指数 | G_LSI | W_LSI | 反映景观形状的复杂程度 |
| 平均斑块面积 | G_AREA_MN | W_AREA_MN | 绿色/蓝色空间斑块的平均大小/hm2 |
| 斑块聚集度 | G_AI | W_AI | 衡量绿地/水体斑块的聚集程度/% |
| 斑块连接度指数 | W_COHESION | W_COHESION | 反映绿地/水体斑块的自然连通程度/% |
| 生态利用效率 | 综合效率/% | 纯技术效率/% | 规模效率/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 低效率(<0.75) | 7.95 | 0.02 | 2.25 |
| 中低效率 [0.75-0.90) | 76.70 | 74.41 | 8.66 |
| 中高效率 [0.9-1.0) | 14.38 | 23.56 | 88.77 |
| 高效率(≥1.0) | 0.96 | 2.02 | 0.32 |
Table 4 Classification of ecological utilization efficiency grades
| 生态利用效率 | 综合效率/% | 纯技术效率/% | 规模效率/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 低效率(<0.75) | 7.95 | 0.02 | 2.25 |
| 中低效率 [0.75-0.90) | 76.70 | 74.41 | 8.66 |
| 中高效率 [0.9-1.0) | 14.38 | 23.56 | 88.77 |
| 高效率(≥1.0) | 0.96 | 2.02 | 0.32 |
Figure 3 The average values of comprehensive ecological efficiency, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency of green and blue spaces in (a) provinces and (b) cities
| 模型 | 景观格局指数 | 综合效率(a) | 纯技术效率(b) | 规模效率(c) | 景观格局指数滞后项 | 综合效率(a) | 纯技术效率(b) | 规模效率(c) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | G_SHAPE_MN | −0.1240*** | −0.0453*** | −0.0910*** | w_G_SHAPE_MN | 0.0007 | 0.0170*** | −0.0075 |
| W_SHAPE_MN | −0.0021** | −0.0027*** | 0.00048 | w_W_SHAPE_MN | 0.0045** | 0.0031** | 0.0018 | |
| II | G_LSI | −0.0030*** | −0.0034*** | 0.00028 | w_G_LSI | 0.0011** | 0.0013*** | −0.0008* |
| W_LSI | −0.0014*** | −0.0006*** | −0.0009*** | w_W_LSI | 0.0017*** | 0.0012*** | 0.0008*** | |
| III | G_AREA_MN | −0.0029*** | −3.8E−05 | −0.0031*** | w_G_AREA_MN | −0.0010*** | −0.0002 | −0.0012*** |
| W_AREA_MN | −0.0001** | −0.0002*** | 9.98E−05*** | w_W_AREA_MN | −0.0002* | −0.0000 | −0.0001* | |
| IV | G_AI | −0.0021*** | −0.0008*** | −0.0015*** | w_G_AI10 | 0.0005*** | 0.0005*** | 0.0001* |
| W_AI | −6.9E−05 | −0.0001*** | 4.32E−05 | w_W_AI | 0.0003*** | 0.0001*** | 0.0002*** | |
| V | G_COHESION | −0.0019*** | −0.0009*** | −0.0011*** | w_G_COHESION | 0.0007*** | 0.0006*** | 0.0002*** |
| W_COHESION | −0.0002*** | −0.0002*** | −7.5E−05*** | w_W_COHESION | 0.0002*** | 0.0001*** | 0.0002*** |
Table 5 Regression results of spatial Durbin model
| 模型 | 景观格局指数 | 综合效率(a) | 纯技术效率(b) | 规模效率(c) | 景观格局指数滞后项 | 综合效率(a) | 纯技术效率(b) | 规模效率(c) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | G_SHAPE_MN | −0.1240*** | −0.0453*** | −0.0910*** | w_G_SHAPE_MN | 0.0007 | 0.0170*** | −0.0075 |
| W_SHAPE_MN | −0.0021** | −0.0027*** | 0.00048 | w_W_SHAPE_MN | 0.0045** | 0.0031** | 0.0018 | |
| II | G_LSI | −0.0030*** | −0.0034*** | 0.00028 | w_G_LSI | 0.0011** | 0.0013*** | −0.0008* |
| W_LSI | −0.0014*** | −0.0006*** | −0.0009*** | w_W_LSI | 0.0017*** | 0.0012*** | 0.0008*** | |
| III | G_AREA_MN | −0.0029*** | −3.8E−05 | −0.0031*** | w_G_AREA_MN | −0.0010*** | −0.0002 | −0.0012*** |
| W_AREA_MN | −0.0001** | −0.0002*** | 9.98E−05*** | w_W_AREA_MN | −0.0002* | −0.0000 | −0.0001* | |
| IV | G_AI | −0.0021*** | −0.0008*** | −0.0015*** | w_G_AI10 | 0.0005*** | 0.0005*** | 0.0001* |
| W_AI | −6.9E−05 | −0.0001*** | 4.32E−05 | w_W_AI | 0.0003*** | 0.0001*** | 0.0002*** | |
| V | G_COHESION | −0.0019*** | −0.0009*** | −0.0011*** | w_G_COHESION | 0.0007*** | 0.0006*** | 0.0002*** |
| W_COHESION | −0.0002*** | −0.0002*** | −7.5E−05*** | w_W_COHESION | 0.0002*** | 0.0001*** | 0.0002*** |
| 模型 | 变量 | 综合效率(a) | 纯技术效率(b) | 规模效率(c) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 直接效应 | 间接效应 | 总效应 | 直接效应 | 间接效应 | 总效应 | 直接效应 | 间接效应 | 总效应 | ||||
| I | G_SHAPE_MN | −0.1240 | −0.2217 | −0.3457 | −0.0453 | −0.0752 | −0.1205 | −0.0910 | −0.1946 | −0.2856 | ||
| W_SHAPE_MN | −0.0021 | −0.0037 | −0.0057 | −0.0027 | −0.0044 | −0.0071 | 0.0005 | 0.0010 | 0.0015 | |||
| II | G_LSI | −0.0030 | −0.0078 | −0.0108 | −0.0034 | −0.0053 | −0.0087 | 0.0003 | 0.0009 | 0.0012 | ||
| W_LSI | −0.0014 | −0.0035 | −0.0048 | −0.0006 | −0.0010 | −0.0016 | −0.0009 | −0.0027 | −0.0036 | |||
| III | G_AREA_MN | −0.0029 | −0.0048 | −0.0077 | −0.0000 | −0.0001 | −0.0001 | −0.0031 | −0.0046 | −0.0077 | ||
| W_AREA_MN | −0.0001 | −0.0002 | −0.0003 | −0.0002 | −0.0003 | −0.0005 | 0.0001 | 0.0002 | 0.0003 | |||
| IV | G_AI | −0.0021 | −0.0040 | −0.0060 | −0.0008 | −0.0014 | −0.0022 | −0.0015 | −0.0032 | −0.0047 | ||
| W_AI | −0.0001 | −0.0001 | −0.0002 | −0.0001 | −0.0002 | −0.0003 | 0.0000 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | |||
| V | G_COHESION | −0.0019 | −0.0040 | −0.0059 | −0.0009 | −0.0016 | −0.0025 | −0.0011 | −0.0028 | −0.0039 | ||
| W_COHESION | −0.0002 | −0.0005 | −0.0007 | −0.0002 | −0.0003 | −0.0004 | −0.0001 | −0.0002 | −0.0003 | |||
Table 6 Spatial Durbin model effect decomposition
| 模型 | 变量 | 综合效率(a) | 纯技术效率(b) | 规模效率(c) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 直接效应 | 间接效应 | 总效应 | 直接效应 | 间接效应 | 总效应 | 直接效应 | 间接效应 | 总效应 | ||||
| I | G_SHAPE_MN | −0.1240 | −0.2217 | −0.3457 | −0.0453 | −0.0752 | −0.1205 | −0.0910 | −0.1946 | −0.2856 | ||
| W_SHAPE_MN | −0.0021 | −0.0037 | −0.0057 | −0.0027 | −0.0044 | −0.0071 | 0.0005 | 0.0010 | 0.0015 | |||
| II | G_LSI | −0.0030 | −0.0078 | −0.0108 | −0.0034 | −0.0053 | −0.0087 | 0.0003 | 0.0009 | 0.0012 | ||
| W_LSI | −0.0014 | −0.0035 | −0.0048 | −0.0006 | −0.0010 | −0.0016 | −0.0009 | −0.0027 | −0.0036 | |||
| III | G_AREA_MN | −0.0029 | −0.0048 | −0.0077 | −0.0000 | −0.0001 | −0.0001 | −0.0031 | −0.0046 | −0.0077 | ||
| W_AREA_MN | −0.0001 | −0.0002 | −0.0003 | −0.0002 | −0.0003 | −0.0005 | 0.0001 | 0.0002 | 0.0003 | |||
| IV | G_AI | −0.0021 | −0.0040 | −0.0060 | −0.0008 | −0.0014 | −0.0022 | −0.0015 | −0.0032 | −0.0047 | ||
| W_AI | −0.0001 | −0.0001 | −0.0002 | −0.0001 | −0.0002 | −0.0003 | 0.0000 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | |||
| V | G_COHESION | −0.0019 | −0.0040 | −0.0059 | −0.0009 | −0.0016 | −0.0025 | −0.0011 | −0.0028 | −0.0039 | ||
| W_COHESION | −0.0002 | −0.0005 | −0.0007 | −0.0002 | −0.0003 | −0.0004 | −0.0001 | −0.0002 | −0.0003 | |||
| [1] |
Cao W, Wang L Y, Li R, et al., 2025. Unveiling the nonlinear relationships and co-mitigation effects of green and blue space landscapes on PM2.5 exposure through explainable machine learning[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 122: 106234.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
Cao W, Zhou W, Wu T, et al., 2022. Spatial-temporal characteristics of cultivated land use eco-efficiency under carbon constraints and its relationship with landscape pattern dynamics[J]. Ecological Indicators, 141: 109140.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
Fang G J, Sun X, Liao C, et al., 2023. How do ecosystem services evolve across urban-rural transitional landscapes of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in China: Patterns, trade-offs, and drivers[J]. Landscape Ecology, 38: 1125-1145.
DOI |
| [4] |
Jamil R, Julian J P, Jensen J L R, et al., 2024. Urban green infrastructure connectivity: The role of private semi-natural areas[J]. Land, 13(8): 1213.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
Lei Y, Xiao Y, Wang F, et al., 2024. Investigation on the complex relationship between urbanization and eco-efficiency in urban agglomeration of China: The case study of Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration[J]. Ecological Indicators, 159: 111704.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
Liu S C, Wu P J, 2023. How does population agglomeration influence China’s energy eco-efficiency? Evidence from spatial econometric analysis[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(28): 72248-72261.
DOI |
| [7] |
Liu Y, Song Y, Arp H P, 2012. Examination of the relationship between urban form and urban eco-efficiency in China[J]. Habitat International, 36(1): 171-177.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
Peng M H, Zhang X L, Luo J, et al., 2025. Spatial patterns and drivers of China's agricultural ecological efficiency: A super-efficiency EBM-GeoDetector Approach[J]. Sustainability, 17(6): 2739.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
Rashidi K, Saen R F, 2015. Measuring eco-efficiency based on green indicators and potentials in energy saving and undesirable output abatement[J]. Energy Econ, 50: 18-26.
DOI URL |
| [10] | Schaltegger S, Sturm A, 1990. Ökologische Rationalität: Ansatzpunkte zur Ausgestaltung von ökologieorientierten Managementinstrumenten[J]. Die Unternehmung, 44(4): 273-290. |
| [11] |
Van O W, Van P S, Cools J, 2020. Urban green infrastructure: A review on valuation toolkits from an urban planning perspective[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 267: 110603.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
Wu J, Yang S, Zhang X, 2020. Interaction analysis of urban blue-green space and built-up area based on coupling model: A case study of Wuhan central city[J]. Water, 12(8): 2185.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
Xiang Y, Ye Y, Peng C C, et al., 2022. Seasonal variations for combined effects of landscape metrics on land surface temperature (LST) and aerosol optical depth (AOD)[J]. Ecological Indicators, 138: 108810.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
Xue D, Li Y, Ahmad F, et al., 2021. Urban eco-efficiency and its influencing factors in Western China: Fresh evidence from Chinese cities based on the US-SBM[J]. Ecological Indicators, 127: 107784.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
Yu S Y, Chen Z Q, Yu B L, et al., 2020. Exploring the relationship between 2D/3D landscape pattern and land surface temperature based on explainable eXtreme Gradient Boosting tree: A case study of Shanghai, China[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 725: 138229.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
Zhang F, Qian H C, 2024. A comprehensive review of the environmental benefits of urban green spaces[J]. Environmental Research, 252(2): 118837.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
Zhou W, Cao W, Wu T, et al., 2023. The win-win interaction between integrated blue and green space on urban cooling[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 863: 160712.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
Zhou Y, Kong Y, Wang H K, et al., 2020. The impact of population urbanization lag on eco-efficiency: A panel quantile approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244: 118664.
DOI URL |
| [19] | 杜娅明, 2024. 黄河流域土地利用碳排放效率时空演变及其对景观格局的响应[D]. 西安: 西北师范大学. |
| Du Y M, 2024. Spatiotemporal evolution of land use carbon emission efficiency in the Yellow River Basin and its response to landscape patterns[D]. Xi’an: Northwest Normal University. | |
| [20] | 贺震, 2019. 构建长三区域生态环保共同体[N]. 中国环境报, 2019-05-31(3). |
| He Z, 2019. Building an ecological and environmental protection community in the Yangtze River Delta region[N]. China Environment News, 2019-05-31(3). | |
| [21] | 李彤辉, 韩素波, 李强, 等, 2025. 京津冀县域景观格局演进对国土空间生态效率的影响研究[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 41(4): 35-43. |
| Li T H, Han S B, Li Q, et al., 2025. Impact of county-level landscape pattern evolution on ecological efficiency of land space in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 41(4): 35-43. | |
| [22] | 刘蒙罢, 张安录, 熊燕飞, 2022. 长江经济带城市土地利用生态效率空间差异及其与产业结构升级的交互溢出效应[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 32(10): 125-139. |
| Liu M B, Zhang A L, Xiong Y F, 2022. Spatial differences of urban land use ecological efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and its interactive spillover effects with industrial structure upgrading[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 32(10): 125-139. | |
| [23] | 江曼琦, 田伟腾, 2024. 中国城市生态空间规模与结构对空气污染的影响[J]. 城市问题 (12): 20-31. |
| Jiang M Q, Tian W T, 2024. Impact of the scale and structure of urban ecological space on air pollution in China[J]. Urban Problems (12): 20-31. | |
| [24] | 马才学, 杨蓉萱, 柯新利, 等, 2022. 城市扩张背景下生态用地格局与生态效率的多尺度关联分析[J]. 生态科学, 41(5): 1-10. |
| Ma C X, Yang R X, Ke X L, et al., 2022. Multi-scale correlation analysis of ecological land use pattern and ecological efficiency under urban expansion[J]. Ecological Science, 41(5): 1-10. | |
| [25] | 孙定钊, 梁友嘉, 刘丽珺, 2024. 贵州省2000-2020年土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 33(3): 547-560. |
| Sun D Z, Liang Y J, Liu L J, 2024. Impact of land use change on ecosystem service value in Guizhou Province from 2000 to 2020[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 33(3): 547-560. | |
| [26] | 涂燕茹, 邢龙, 伍旭坤, 等, 2025. 基于Meta-AHP-IPA的城市蓝绿空间生态系统服务功能评价--以马鞍山市为例[J]. 白城师范学院学报, 39(2): 67-74. |
| Tu Y R, Xiang L, Wu X K, et al., 2025. Evaluation of urban blue-green space ecosystem service function based on Meta-AHP-IPA: A case study of Ma’anshan City[J]. Journal of Baicheng Normal University, 39(2): 67-74. | |
| [27] | 王飞, 陶芹, 程宪波, 等, 2023. 快速城镇化地区景观格局变化对水生态系统服务的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 37(1): 159-167. |
| Wang F, Tao Q, Cheng X B, et al., 2023. Influence of landscape pattern change on water ecosystem service in rapidly urbanization areas[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 37(1): 159-167. | |
| [28] |
许浩, 金婷, 刘伟, 2022. 苏锡常都市圈蓝绿空间规模与格局演变特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 46(1): 219-226.
DOI |
| Xu H, Jin T, Liu W, 2022. Study on the scale and landscape pattern evolution characteristics of blue-green space in Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou metropolitan area, China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 46(1): 219-226. | |
| [29] |
杨昊彧, 黄康江, 陈晓东, 等, 2025. 贵州省生态空间效率演变及景观格局的影响归因[J]. 生态环境学报, 34(6): 902-913.
DOI |
| Yang H Y, Huang K J, Chen X D, et al., 2025. Evolution of ecological spatial efficiency and attribution analysis of landscape pattern in Guizhou Province[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 34(6): 902-913. | |
| [30] | 杨婉清, 王晨睿, 孙晓, 等, 2024. 农业区生态系统服务的影响因素及空间优化分析--以北京市为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 45(1): 116-128. |
| Yang W Q, Wang C R, Sun X, et al., 2024. Influencing factors and spatial optimization analysis of ecosystem services in agricultural areas: A case study of Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 45(1): 116-128. | |
| [31] | 杨雨辰, 焦胜, 卢洁, 等, 2025. 基于景观生态风险和生态系统服务供需的生态分区研究--以浏阳河流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 34(9): 2104-2117. |
| Yang Y C, Jiao S, Lu J, et al., 2025. Ecological zoning based on landscape ecological risk and supply-demand of ecosystem services: A case study of Liuyang River Basin[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 34(9): 2104-2117. | |
| [32] | 禹佳宁, 周燕, 王雪原, 等, 2021. 城市蓝绿景观格局对雨洪调蓄功能的影响[J]. 风景园林, 28(9):63-67. |
| Yu J N, Zhou Y, Wang X Y, et al., 2021. Influence of urban blue-green landscape pattern on rainfall-flood regulation and storage function[J]. Landscape Architecture, 28(9): 63-67. | |
| [33] | 袁旸洋, 罗尚岑, 郭蔚, 等, 2025. 城市蓝绿空间生态效益测度及关键影响因子识别--以南京中心城区为例[J]. 中国城市林业, 23(4): 1-11. |
| Yuan Y Y, Luo S C, Guo W, et al., 2025. Ecological benefits measurement and key influencing factor identification for urban blue-green spaces: A case study of Nanjing City core[J]. Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry, 23(4): 1-11. | |
| [34] | 袁旸洋, 张佳琦, 汤思琪, 等, 2023. 基于文献计量分析的城市蓝绿空间生态效益研究综述与展望[J]. 园林, 40(4): 59-67. |
| Yuan Y Y, Zhang J Q, Tang S Q, et al., 2023. Progress and review of research on urban blue-green space based on bibliometric analysis[J]. Landscape Architecture, 40(4): 59-67. | |
| [35] |
张利国, 谭笑, 肖晴川, 等, 2023. 基于气候资源投入的中国农业生态效率测度与区域差异[J]. 经济地理, 43(4): 154-163.
DOI |
|
Zhang L G, Tan X, Xiao Q C, et al., 2023. Agricultural eco-efficiency measurement and regional difference in China based on the climate resource input[J]. Economic Geography, 43(4): 154-163.
DOI |
|
| [36] | 张贤, 刘彦随, 王伟, 等, 2025. 基于PLUS-InVEST模型的中国多情景土地利用变化模拟及其对生态系统服务功能的影响[J]. 生态学报, 45(19): 9577-9593. |
| Zhang X, Liu Y S, Wang W, et al., 2025. Simulation of multi-scenario land use change and its impact on ecosystem services in China based on PLUS-InVEST model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 45(19): 9577-9593. | |
| [37] | 赵强, 王天鸠, 王涛, 等, 2024. 基于InVEST模型的长三角生态绿色一体化示范区生境质量时空演变特征分析[J]. 自然资源遥感, 36(3): 187-195. |
| Zhao Q, Wang T J, Wang T, et al., 2024. Analysis of spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of habitat quality in the Yangtze River Delta Eco-Green Integrated Development Demonstration Zone based on InVEST model[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 36(3): 187-195. | |
| [38] | 周杰, 张学儒, 牟凤云, 等, 2018. 基于CA-Markov的土壤有机碳储量空间格局重建研究--以泛长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 27(7): 1565-1575. |
| Zhou J, Zhang X R, Mou F Y, et al., 2018. Reconstruction of spatial pattern of soil organic carbon storage based on CA-Markov: A case study of Pan-Yangtze River Delta region[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 27(7): 1565-1575. | |
| [39] | 住房和城乡建设部, 2021. 2020年中国城市建设统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社. |
| Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, 2021. 2020 China urban construction statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press. | |
| [40] | 朱红波, 丁未来, 周瑞彤, 2025. 长江经济带耕地利用生态效率评价与空间格局分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 34(1): 87-99. |
| Zhu H B, Ding W L, Zhou R T, 2025. Evaluation of ecological efficiency and spatial pattern of cultivated land use in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 34(1): 87-99. |
| [1] | Xu Yujing, Yang Hao, Yu Hong, Chai Yuying. Analysis on Spatio-temporal Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Coastal Blue Carbon Storage in the Pearl River Delta, China [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(8): 1163-1175. |
| [2] | Wang Daoyuan, Zhao Ning, Liu Pingxin, Jiao Guiquan, Huang Yuming, Li Xiaohui. Research on the Trade-off and Coordination Characteristics of Ecosystem Services and Zoning Management in the Taihang Mountains [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(8): 1221-1233. |
| [3] | Yao Xubing, Zhang Ling, Che Sifang, Deng Xiaoxia. Study on the Impact of Digital Rural Development on Agricultural Ecological Efficiency [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(7): 1045-1058. |
| [4] | SHI Hongfei, HOU Guangliang, CAO Mingzhu, GUAN Jiameng, HE Jiahao, TANG Zhonghua, MA Shuguang. Water Conservation in the Three-River Headwaters Region of the Yellow River: Spatiotemporal Changes and Driving Forces Using the InVEST Model [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(5): 793-804. |
| [5] | WANG Yue, YU Fudong, ZHANG Yue, XIANG Hengxing, YAN Hengqi, MAO Dehua. Multi-scenario Simulation of Landscape Pattern and Carbon Storage Changes in Northeast Black Soil Region Based on the PLUS-InVEST Model [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(2): 178-189. |
| [6] | HOU Huimin, LI Haohao, WANG Hui, WANG Pengquan, BAO Zhiqiang, REN Zhiwei. Assessment and Future Scenario Prediction of Nitrogen Retention Function in the Shiyang River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(2): 232-244. |
| [7] | WEN Yujing, LI Ni. Spatiotemporal Differentiation and Zoning of Carbon Storage in Hilly Areas Based on Topographic Gradients: Take Chang-Zhu-Tan Urban Agglomeration As an Example [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(9): 1373-1385. |
| [8] | WANG Tianwen, LUO Mingliang, BAI Leichao. Dynamic Changes and Trade-off-Synergy Analysis of Ecosystem Services in the Jialing River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(6): 888-901. |
| [9] | ZHANG Hongbo, YIN Ban, LI Chunyong, CUI Songyun, HE Yan, LI Xiaohong, DENG Lixian. Characteristics and Drivers of the Dynamic Evolution of Water Conservation Function in the Honghe River Basin (China Section) in the Last 40 Years [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(4): 556-569. |
| [10] | LI Man, WU Dongli, HE Hao, YU Huijie, ZHAO Lin, LIU Cong, HU Zhenghua, LI Qi. Spatio-temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Carbon Storage in the Yellow River Basin from 1990 to 2020 [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(3): 333-344. |
| [11] | ZHANG Ji, YANG Shiqi, ZHAO Lei, FENG Jieling, CHEN Yanying. Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics of Habitat Quality in the One Belt and Three Barriers Region of Chongqing City Based on the InVEST Model [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(2): 167-180. |
| [12] | MA Yuewei, CHEN Yumei, ZHANG Shenglan, GUI Yali, CHEN Yanmei. Coupling and Coordination of Habitat Quality and Human Activity Intensity in Jiajin Mountains Giant Panda Sanctuary [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(2): 197-208. |
| [13] | ZHANG Yan, ZHANG Shaojuan, LÜ Tao, HE Huiting. Research on the Coupling and Synergistic Relationship between Landscape Ecological Risk and Habitat Quality in the Yellow River Basin (Inner Mongolia Section) [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(12): 1841-1852. |
| [14] | HUANG Jiayuan, YANG Fan, ZOU Bin, XIAO Yadan. Identification and Restoration of Land Use Zones Based on the “State-Structure” Assessment of Ecological Security Patterns: The Case of Hunan Province [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(12): 1853-1865. |
| [15] | TANG Jianting, YUAN Jie, CHEN Zongyan, LI Xiaoyan, SUN Ziting. Study on Land Use Change and Carbon Stock on the South Slope of Qilian Mountains [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(9): 1353-1361. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Website Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Add: 808# Tianyuan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou. 510650.
Institute of Eco-environmental and Soil Sciences, Guangdong Academy of Sciences
Tel/Fax: 020-87024961; E-mail: editor@jeesci.com
Support by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd., E-mail: support@magtech.com.cn