Study on Species Diversity and Soil Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Broad-leaved Pinus koraiensis Forest

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.04.005

Ecology and Environment ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 679-687.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.04.005

• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles

Study on Species Diversity and Soil Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Broad-leaved Pinus koraiensis Forest

CHEN Yao¹^,²(), LI Yunhong¹^,³, SHAO Yingnan¹^,³, LIU Yulong¹^,², LIU Yankun¹^,³^,^*()

1. Heilongjiang Institute of Ecology, Harbin 150081, P. R. China
2. Mudanjiang Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Mudanjiang 157500, P. R. China
3. Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Forestry Ecological Engineering of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150081, P. R. China

Received:2022-02-11 Online:2022-04-18 Published:2022-06-22
Contact: LIU Yankun

阔叶红松林物种多样性与土壤理化特征研究

陈瑶¹^,²(), 李云红¹^,³, 邵英男¹^,³, 刘玉龙¹^,², 刘延坤¹^,³^,^*()

1.黑龙江省生态研究所,黑龙江哈尔滨 150081
2.黑龙江牡丹江森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站,黑龙江牡丹江 157500
3.黑龙江省森林生态与林业生态工程重点实验室,黑龙江哈尔滨 150081

通讯作者: 刘延坤
作者简介:陈瑶（1983年生）,女,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为森林生态。E-mail: chenyao198305@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41475123);黑龙江省重点研发计划项目(GA21C030);黑龙江省省属科研院所科研业务费项目(CZKYF2021-2-C006);黑龙江省省属科研院所科研业务费项目(CZKYF2020C010)

Abstract

Abstract:

In this study, wet, medium and dry Picea spp.-Abies spp.-Pinus koraiensis forests (PLP), Tilia spp.-Pinus koraiensis forests (TPi), and Quercus mongolica-Pinus koraiensis forests (QP) were used as the research objects to analyze the vegetation species diversity among the three forest types. In order to provide a theoretical basis for biodiversity conservation and sustainable management of broad-leaved Pinus koraiensis forest, redundancy analysis was used to explore the impact mechanism of soil physical and chemical characteristics on species diversity. The results show that (1) there were 40 species in the PLP in the study area, belonging to 31 families and 36 genera, 49 species in the TPi, belonging to 37 families and 46 genera, and 37 species in the QP, belonging to 21 families and 25 genera. Among them, the species structure of TPi was rich, and the species composition of QP was poor. (2) There were significant differences in the tree layer richness index, Shannon-Wiener index, Simpson dominance index, and Pielou evenness index among the three forest types. All of them showed the highest values in TPi, significantly higher than those of the other two forest types. The richness index, Shannon-Wiener index, Simpson dominance index, and Pielou evenness index of shrub layer were not significantly different; the herb layer richness index, Shannon-Wiener index, Simpson dominance index, and Pielou evenness index varied significantly, showing the highest distribution in TPi and the lowest distribution in QP. (3) There were significant differences in soil bulk density, water content, total phosphorus content, and total nitrogen content among the three forest types, but their differences in soil pH were not significant. (4) Redundancy analysis showed that soil bulk density, total phosphorus content, and water content were the main environmental factors that significantly affected species diversity in the tree layer, shrub layer, and herb layer. In conclusion, there is a correlation between species diversity and soil physical and chemical characteristics of broad-leaved Pinus koraiensis forest in Xiaoxing’an Mountains. Adjusting soil water content, improving soil aeration, and supplementing soil nutrients can promote the growth and development of understory vegetation, thereby increasing species diversity. Management can be supplemented with phosphate fertilizer and tending and thinning to maintain soil performance and provide suitable conditions for the survival and development of more species.

Key words: Broad-leaved Pinus koraiensis forest, species diversity, soil physical and chemical characteristics, redundancy analysis

摘要：

以湿生、中生、旱生的云杉Picea spp.-冷杉Abies spp.-红松Pinus koraiensis林（PLP）、椴树Tilia spp.-红松林（TPi）和蒙古栎Quercus mongolica-红松林（QP）为研究对象,分析3种林型之间植被物种多样性与土壤理化特征的差异,采用冗余分析的方法,探讨土壤理化特征对物种多样性的影响机制,以期为阔叶红松林的生物多样性保护和森林的可持续经营提供理论基础。结果表明,（1）研究区云杉-冷杉-红松林有40种,隶属于31科36属,椴树-红松林有49种,隶属于37科46属,蒙古栎-红松林有37种,隶属于21科25属,其中,椴树-红松林的物种结构组成丰富,蒙古栎-红松林物种组成结构最贫乏。（2）3种林型乔木层的丰富度指数、Shannon-Wiener 指数、Simpson优势度指数和Pielou均匀度指数之间差异显著,均以椴树-红松林的最高,显著高于其他两个林型。灌木层的丰富度指数、Shannon-Wiener指、Simpson优势度指数和Pielou均匀度指数之间差异不显著;草本层丰富度指数、Shannon-Wiener指数、Simpson优势度指数和Pielou均匀度指数之间差异显著,均呈现椴树-红松林最高,蒙古栎-红松林最低的分布。（3）3种林型土壤容重、含水量、全磷和全氮之间差异显著,土壤pH差异不显著。（4）冗余分析表明,土壤容重、全磷和含水量是显著影响乔木层、灌木层和草本层物种多样性的主要环境因子。小兴安岭阔叶红松林物种多样性与土壤理化特征具有相关性,调节土壤含水量、改善土壤通气性、补充土壤营养成分可促进林下植被生长发育,从而提高物种多样性。在生产经营中可以补充磷肥和抚育间伐等管理,保持良好的土壤性能,为更多物种的生存和发育提供良好的条件。

关键词: 阔叶红松林, 物种组成, 物种多样性, 土壤理化特征, 冗余分析

CLC Number:

CHEN Yao, LI Yunhong, SHAO Yingnan, LIU Yulong, LIU Yankun. Study on Species Diversity and Soil Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Broad-leaved Pinus koraiensis Forest[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(4): 679-687.

陈瑶, 李云红, 邵英男, 刘玉龙, 刘延坤. 阔叶红松林物种多样性与土壤理化特征研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 679-687.

Figures/Tables 6

References 37

[1]	SIM-SIM M, LOPES T, RUAS S, et al., 2015. Does altitude shape molecular diversity and richness of bryophytes in Madeira's natural forest? Acase study with four bryophyte species at two altitudinal levels[J]. Plant Ecology and Evolution, 2148(2): 171-180.
[2]	崔宁洁, 张丹桔, 刘洋, 等, 2014. 不同林龄马尾松人工林林下植物多样性与土壤理化性质[J]. 生态学杂志, 33(10): 2610-2617.
	CUI N J, ZHANG D J, LIU Y, et al., 2014. Plant diversity and soil physicochemical properties under different aged Pinus massoniana plantations[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 33(10): 2610-2617.
[3]	董雪, 杜昕, 孙志虎, 等, 2020. 生境梯度影响下的天然红松种群空间格局与种内关联[J]. 生态学报, 40(15): 5239-5246.
	DONG X, DU X, SUN Z H, et al., 2020. Spatial pattern and intraspecific association of natural Korean pine population under the influence of habitat gradient[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(15): 5239-5246.
[4]	冯健, 王骞春, 陆爱君, 等, 2021. 辽东山区落叶松-水曲柳混交林植物多样性和土壤特性研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报 (自然科学版), 49(6): 27-37.
	FENG J, WANG Q C, LU A J, et al., 2021. Plant Diversity and soil characteristics of larch-manchurianssh mixed stand in eastern Liao ning[J]. Journal of Northwest & Funiversity, 49(6): 27-37.
[5]	郝凌颖, 2012. 紫金山不同坡位林分结构与生物多样性研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学: 1-41.
	HAO L Y, 2012. Study on stand structure and biodiversity of different slope positions in Purple Mountain[D]. Nanjing: Journal of Nanjing Forestry University: 1-41.
[6]	侯红亚, 王立海, 2013. 小兴安岭阔叶红松林物种组成及主要种群的空间分布格局[J]. 应用生态学报, 24(11): 3043-3049.
	HOU H Y, WANG L H, 2013. Species composition and main populations spatial distribution pattern in Korean pine broad- leaved forest in Xiaoxing’an Mountains of Northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(11): 3043-3049.
[7]	黄润霞, 徐明锋, 刘婷, 等, 2020. 亚热带5种森林类型林下植物物种多样性及其环境解释[J]. 西南林业大学学报 (自然科学), 40(2): 53-62.
	HUANG R X, XU M F, LIU T, et al., 2020. Environmental interpretation and species diversity of understory vegetation in 5 subtropical forest types[J]. Journal of Southwest forestry university, 40(2): 53-62.
[8]	李梦佳, 何中声, 江蓝, 等, 2021. 戴云山物种多样性与系统发育多样性海拔梯度分布格局及驱动因子[J]. 生态学报, 41(3): 1148-1157.
	LI M J, HE Z S, JIANG L, et al., 2021. The elevation and factors driving the forest tree diversity and phylogenetic diversity on the south slope of Daiyun Mountain[J]. Acta Ecologica sinica, 41(3): 1148-1157.
[9]	李婷婷, 姬兰柱, 于大炮, 等, 2019. 东北阔叶红松林群落分类、排序及物种多样性比较[J]. 生态学报, 39(2): 620-628.
	LI T T, JI L Z, YU D P, et al., 2019. Forest community classification,ordination,and comparison of species diversity in broadleaved-Korean pine mixed forests of Northeast China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(2): 620-628.
[10]	李文华, 2011. 东北天然林研究[M]. 北京: 气象出版社.
	LI W H, 2011. Study on natural forest in northeast China[M]. Beijing: The meteorological press.
[11]	李瑛云, 宋森, 张艳波, 等, 2013. 阔叶红松林物种多样性变化对土壤性质的影响[J]. 森林工程, 29(4): 24-29.
	LI Y Y, SONG S, ZHANG Y B, et al., 2013. Influence of Species Diversity on the Soil Properties of Broadleaved Korean Pine Forest[J]. Forest Engineering, 29(4): 24-29.
[12]	林丽, 代磊, 林泽北, 等, 2021. 黔中城市森林群落植物多样性及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 生态环境学报, 30(11): 2130-2141.
	LIN L, DAI L, LIN Z B, et al., 2021. Plant diversity and its relationship with soil physicochemical properties of urban forest communities in central Guizhou[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 30(11): 2130-2141.
[13]	刘道锟, 孙海龙, 甘秋妹, 等, 2016. 大兴安岭干旱阳坡不同植被退化阶段土壤理化性质与物种多样性研究[J]. 森林工程, 32(2): 1-6.
	LIU D K, SUN H L, GAN Q M, et al., 2016. Soil physicochemical properties and plant species diversity of different vegetation degradation stages in arid sunny -slope of great Xing’an Mountains[J]. Forest Engineering, 32(2): 1-6.
[14]	刘少冲, 段文标, 冯静, 等, 2011. 林隙对小兴安岭阔叶红松林树种更新及物种多样性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 22(6): 1381-1388.
	LIU S C, DUAN W B, FENG J, et al., 2011. Effect sofforest gapontree species regeneration and diversity of mixed broadleaved Korean pineforestin Xiaoxing’an Mountains[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 22(6): 1381-1388.
[15]	娄淑兰, 刘目兴, 易军, 等, 2019. 三峡山地不同类型植被和坡位对土壤水文功能的影响[J]. 生态学报, 39(13): 4844-4854.
	LOU S L, LIU M X, YI J, et al., 2019. Influence of vegetation coverage and topographic position on soil hydrological function in the hillslope of the three gorges area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(13): 4844-4854.
[16]	骆丹, 王春胜, 刀保辉, 等, 2021. 云南德宏州西南桦天然林物种组成及多样性研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 34(5): 159-167.
	LUO D, WANG C S, DAO B H, et al., 2021. Species Composition and Diversity of Betula alnoides Natural Forests at Dehong Prefecture, Yunnan Province[J]. Forest Research, 34(5): 159-167.
[17]	秦娟, 唐心红, 杨雪梅, 2013. 马尾松不同林型对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 22(4): 598-604.
	QIN J, TANG X H, YANG X M, 2013. Effects of soil physical and chemical properties on different forest types of Pinus massoniana[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 22(4): 598-604.
[18]	舒韦维, 卢立华, 李华, 等, 2021. 林分密度对杉木人工林林下植被和土壤性质的影响[J]. 生态学报, 41(11): 4521-4530.
	SHU W W, LU L H, LI H, et al., 2021. Effects of stand density on understory vegetation and soil properties of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(11): 4521-4530.
[19]	王冰, 张鹏杰, 张秋良, 2021. 不同林型兴安落叶松林土壤理化特征[J]. 西北林学院学报, 36(6): 65-71.
	WANG B, ZHANG P J, ZHANG Q L, 2021. Soil physicochemical characteristics of Larix gmelinii Forest with different forest types[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 36(6): 65-71.
[20]	王梅, 2010. 陕北黄土高原油松人工林生物学特性与天然化发育评价[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学.
	WANG M, 2010. Biological characteristics and evaluation of naturalized development of pinus tabulaeformis plantation in Some Random Place Somewhere of Shanbei[D]. Yangling: Journal of Northwest A & F University.
[21]	王媚臻, 齐锦秋, 魏丽萍, 等, 2018. 人为干扰对栲树次生林群落物种多样性和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 26(4): 355-362.
	WANG M Z, QI J Q, WEI L P, et al., 2018. Effect of Human disturbance on species diversity and soil physio-chemical properties of Castanopsis fargesii secondary forest[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 26(4): 355-362.
[22]	魏晨辉, 沈光, 裴忠雪, 等, 2015. 不同植物种植对松嫩平原盐碱地土壤理化性质与细根生长的影响[J]. 植物研究, 35(5): 759-764.
	WEI C H, SHEN G, PEI Z X, et al., 2015. Effects of different plants cultivation on soil physical-chemical properties and fine root growth in saline-alkaline soil in Songnen Plain, northeastern China[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 35(5): 759-764.
[23]	吴晓莆, 朱彪, 赵淑清, 等, 2004. 东北地区阔叶红松林的群落结构及其物种多样性比较[J]. 生物多样性, 12(1): 174-181. DOI
	WU X P, ZHU B, ZHAO S Q, et al., 2004. Comparison of community structure and species diversity of mixed forests of deciduous broad-leaved tree and Korean pine in Northeast China[J]. Biodiversity Science, 12(1): 174-181. DOI URL
[24]	徐化成, 2001. 中国红松天然林[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社.
	XU H C, 2001. Natural Korean pine forest in China[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House.
[25]	杨京彪, 郭泺, 周萤, 等, 2015. 坡位对红松阔叶林物种多样性的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 43(1): 28-31.
	YANG J B, GUO S, ZHOU Y, et al., 2015. Effects of slope position on species diversity of broad-leaved Korea pine forest[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 43(1): 28-31.
[26]	杨晓惠, 林文树, 刘曦, 等, 2021. 小兴安岭典型阔叶红松林幼树的群落结构动态[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 41(12): 87-97.
	YANG X H, LIN W S, LIU X, et al., 2021. The species-abundance distribution pattern of broad-leaved Korean pine forest in the Lesser Khingan mountains[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 40(12): 104-113, 133.
[27]	曾歆花, 张万军, 宋以刚, 等, 2013. 河北太行山低山丘陵区植被恢复过程中物种多样性与土壤养分变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 32(4): 852-858.
	ZENG X H, ZHANG W J, SONG Y G, et al., 2013. Species diversity and soil nutrient dynamics along a chronosequence of vegetation restoration in Taihang Mountains hilly region, Hebei Province of North China[J]. Chinese Journal Ecology, 32(4): 852-858.
[28]	张林静, 岳明, 顾峰雪, 等, 2002. 新疆阜康绿洲荒漠过渡带植物群落物种多样性与土壤环境因子的耦合关系[J]. 应用生态学报, (06): 658-662.
	ZHANG L J, YUE M, GU F X, et al., 2002. Coupling relationship between plant communities' species diversity and soil factors in ecotone between desert and oasis in Fukang, Xinjiang[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, (06): 658-662.
[29]	张玲, 张东来, 毛子军, 2017. 小兴安岭阔叶红松林不同演替系列土壤有机碳及各组分特征[J]. 林业科学, 53(9): 11-17.
	ZHANG L, ZHANG D L, MAO Z J, 2017. Charicateristic of soil oranic carbon and its components in different successionalseries of broadleaved Korean pine forest in Xiaoxing’an Mountains[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 53(9): 11-17.
[30]	张沛健, 徐建民, 卢万鸿, 等, 2021. 雷州半岛不同林龄尾细桉林植物多样性和土壤理化性质分析[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 41(9): 96-105.
	ZHANG P J, XU J M, LU W H, et al., 2021. Plant diversity and soil physicochemical properties under different aged Eucalyptus urophylla×Eucalyptus tereticornis plantations in Leizhou Peninsula[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 41(9): 96-105.
[31]	张荣, 李婷婷, 金锁, 等, 2020. 人为干扰对蒙顶山木荷次生林物种多样性及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 37(5): 867-875.
	ZHANG R, LI T T, JIN S, et al., 2020. Effects of human disturbance on species diversity and soil physiochemical properties of Schimasuperba community in Mengding Mountain[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 37(5): 867-875.
[32]	张筱, 陈义堂, 杨秋菊, 等, 2022. 不同地形100年生杉木人工林土壤理化性质及林下植被多样性差异分析[J]. 西南林业大学学报 (自然科学), 42(1): 1-11.
	ZHANG X, CHEN Y T, YANG Q J, et al., 2022. Differences of soil physicochemical properties and undergrowth vegetation diversity of 100 year old chinese fir plantations in different terrain[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Sciences), 42(1): 1-11.
[33]	张勇强, 李智超, 厚凌宇, 等, 2020. 林分密度对杉木人工林下物种多样性和土壤养分的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 57(1): 239-250.
	ZHANG Y Q, LI Z C, HOU L Y, et al., 2020. Effects of stand density on understory species diversity and soil nutrients in Chinese fir plantation[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 57(1): 239-250.
[34]	赵一臣, 张鑫, 张君卿, 2019. 原始阔叶红松林土壤微生物特征研究[J]. 林业资源管理, (3): 132-138.
	ZHAO Y C, ZHANG X, ZHANG J Q, 2019. Study on soil microbial characteristics of primitive broad-leaved Korean pine forest[J]. Forest Resources Management, (3): 132-138.
[35]	郑鸾, 龙翠玲, 2020. 茂兰喀斯特森林不同地形植物多样性与土壤理化特征研究[J]. 广西植物, 40(6): 792-801.
	ZHENG L, LONG C L, 2020. Differences of plant diversity and soil physicochemical properties in Maolan karst forest under different topographic conditions[J]. Guihaia, 40(6): 792-801.
[36]	周润惠, 苏天成, 喻静, 等, 2022. 碧峰峡常绿阔叶林不同群落物种多样性和土壤理化性质[J]. 生态学杂志, 41(1): 1-8.
	ZHOU R H, SU T C, YU J, et al., 2022. Species diversity and soil physicochemical properties of different communities in Bifengxia evergreen broad-leaved forest[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 41(1): 1-8.
[37]	周晓果, 2016. 林下植物功能群丧失对桉树人工林土壤生态系统多功能性的影响[D]. 南宁: 广西大学: 1-169.
	ZHOU X G, 2016. Effects of understory plant functional groups loss on soil ecosystem multifunctionlity in Eucalyptus plantations[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University: 1-169.

林型 Forest type	海拔 Altitude/m	坡度 Slope/(°)	坡位 Slope Position	坡向 Aspect	地形 Topography	林分密度 Stand density/(plant∙hm^-2)	平均胸径DBH/cm	生境 Habitat preference
PLP	348±27	13±2	中坡	西南	山地	660	32.86±6.09	湿生
TPi	384±36	12±3	中坡	南	山地	500	33.71±1.74	中生
QP	478±2	20±2	上坡	南	山地	560	30.05±3.28	旱生

林型 Forest type	海拔 Altitude/m	坡度 Slope/(°)	坡位 Slope Position	坡向 Aspect	地形 Topography	林分密度 Stand density/(plant∙hm^-2)	平均胸径DBH/cm	生境 Habitat preference
PLP	348±27	13±2	中坡	西南	山地	660	32.86±6.09	湿生
TPi	384±36	12±3	中坡	南	山地	500	33.71±1.74	中生
QP	478±2	20±2	上坡	南	山地	560	30.05±3.28	旱生

层次 Layer	林型 Forest type	科 Family	属 Genus	种 Species	主要物种及其重要值 Main species and their important values	和值 Sum values
乔木层 Arbors layer	PLP	4	5	6	红松 (0.4005)+冷杉 (0.2171)+云杉 (0.0890)+椴树 (0.0683) Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc.+Abies nephrolepis (Trautv.) Maxim.+Picea spp.+Tilia spp.	0.7704
	TPi	7	8	11	红松 (0.6426)+椴树 (0.2068)+冷杉 (0.0623)+云杉 (0.0525) Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc.+Tilia spp.+Abies nephrolepis (Trautv.) Maxim.+Picea spp.	0.9642
	QP	5	6	8	红松 (0.5708)+蒙古栎 (0.2900)+白桦 (0.0624)+枫桦 (0.0509) Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc.+Quercus mongolica Fisch. ex Ledeb.+Betula platyphylla Suk.+Betula costata Trautv	0.9741
灌木层 Shurb layer	PLP	9	10	12	毛榛 (0.1429)+珍珠梅 (0.1029)+刺五加 (0.0952)+山刺玫 (0.0752) Corylus mandshurica Maxim.+Sorbaria sorbifolia (L.) A. Br+Acanthopanax senticosus (Rupr. Maxim.) Harms+Rosa davurica Pall.	0.4162
	TPi	8	9	9	瘤枝卫矛 (0.1538)+珍珠梅 (0.1338)+山梅花 (0.0769)+刺五加 (0.0679) Euonymus verrucosus Scop.+Sorbaria sorbifolia (L.) A. Br+Philadelphus incanus Koehne+Acanthopanax senticosus (Rupr. Maxim.) Harms	0.4324
	QP	8	9	10	瘤枝卫矛 (0.2105)+胡枝子 (0.2005)+兴安杜鹃 (0.1579)+溲疏 (0.1053) Euonymus verrucosus Scop.+Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.+Rhododendron dauricum L.+Deutzia scabra Thunb.	0.6742
草本层 Herb layer	PLP	18	21	22	金腰子 (0.1439)+新蹄盖蕨 (0.1364)+羊胡子苔草 (0.1136)+大穗苔草 (0.0716) Chrysosplenium serreanum H and.- Mazz.+Neoathyrium crenulatoserrulatum (Makino) Ching et Z. R. Wang+Eriophorum russeolum+Carex rhynchophysa C. A. Mey.	0.4655
	TPi	22	29	29	羊胡子苔草 (0.1377)+新蹄盖蕨 (0.1005)+宽叶山蒿 (0.0713)+金腰子 (0.0611) Carex callitrichos V. Krccz.in kom. FI+Neoathyrium crenulatoserrulatum (Makino) Ching et Z. R. Wang+Artemisia stolonifera (Maxim.) Komar.+Chrysosplenium serreanum H and.-Mazz.	0.3706
	QP	8	10	19	羊胡子苔草 (0.4393)+舞鹤草 (0.0998)+东方草莓 (0.0967)+宽叶山蒿 (0.0764) Carex callitrichos V. Krccz.in kom. FI+Maianthemum bifolium (Linn.) F. W. Schmid+Fragaria orientalis Losinsk+Artemisia stolonifera (Maxim.) Komar	0.7122

层次 Layer	林型 Forest type	科 Family	属 Genus	种 Species	主要物种及其重要值 Main species and their important values	和值 Sum values
乔木层 Arbors layer	PLP	4	5	6	红松 (0.4005)+冷杉 (0.2171)+云杉 (0.0890)+椴树 (0.0683) Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc.+Abies nephrolepis (Trautv.) Maxim.+Picea spp.+Tilia spp.	0.7704
	TPi	7	8	11	红松 (0.6426)+椴树 (0.2068)+冷杉 (0.0623)+云杉 (0.0525) Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc.+Tilia spp.+Abies nephrolepis (Trautv.) Maxim.+Picea spp.	0.9642
	QP	5	6	8	红松 (0.5708)+蒙古栎 (0.2900)+白桦 (0.0624)+枫桦 (0.0509) Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc.+Quercus mongolica Fisch. ex Ledeb.+Betula platyphylla Suk.+Betula costata Trautv	0.9741
灌木层 Shurb layer	PLP	9	10	12	毛榛 (0.1429)+珍珠梅 (0.1029)+刺五加 (0.0952)+山刺玫 (0.0752) Corylus mandshurica Maxim.+Sorbaria sorbifolia (L.) A. Br+Acanthopanax senticosus (Rupr. Maxim.) Harms+Rosa davurica Pall.	0.4162
	TPi	8	9	9	瘤枝卫矛 (0.1538)+珍珠梅 (0.1338)+山梅花 (0.0769)+刺五加 (0.0679) Euonymus verrucosus Scop.+Sorbaria sorbifolia (L.) A. Br+Philadelphus incanus Koehne+Acanthopanax senticosus (Rupr. Maxim.) Harms	0.4324
	QP	8	9	10	瘤枝卫矛 (0.2105)+胡枝子 (0.2005)+兴安杜鹃 (0.1579)+溲疏 (0.1053) Euonymus verrucosus Scop.+Lespedeza bicolor Turcz.+Rhododendron dauricum L.+Deutzia scabra Thunb.	0.6742
草本层 Herb layer	PLP	18	21	22	金腰子 (0.1439)+新蹄盖蕨 (0.1364)+羊胡子苔草 (0.1136)+大穗苔草 (0.0716) Chrysosplenium serreanum H and.- Mazz.+Neoathyrium crenulatoserrulatum (Makino) Ching et Z. R. Wang+Eriophorum russeolum+Carex rhynchophysa C. A. Mey.	0.4655
	TPi	22	29	29	羊胡子苔草 (0.1377)+新蹄盖蕨 (0.1005)+宽叶山蒿 (0.0713)+金腰子 (0.0611) Carex callitrichos V. Krccz.in kom. FI+Neoathyrium crenulatoserrulatum (Makino) Ching et Z. R. Wang+Artemisia stolonifera (Maxim.) Komar.+Chrysosplenium serreanum H and.-Mazz.	0.3706
	QP	8	10	19	羊胡子苔草 (0.4393)+舞鹤草 (0.0998)+东方草莓 (0.0967)+宽叶山蒿 (0.0764) Carex callitrichos V. Krccz.in kom. FI+Maianthemum bifolium (Linn.) F. W. Schmid+Fragaria orientalis Losinsk+Artemisia stolonifera (Maxim.) Komar	0.7122

土壤因子 Soil factors	土层深度Soil depth/ cm	林型Forest type
土壤因子 Soil factors	土层深度Soil depth/ cm	PLP	TPi	QP
SBD/ (g∙cm^-3)	0‒10	0.85±0.05ABc	0.62±0.05Bb	1.10±0.06Aa
	10‒20	1.08±0.07Ab	0.95±0.07Bab	1.09±0.05Ba
	20‒30	1.28±0.10Aa	1.19±0.03Ba	1.31±0.08Ba
w_(SWC)/ %	0‒10	84.86±18.62Aa	83.23±12.67Aa	64.13±5.71Ba
	10‒20	69.37±19.88Aa	40.50±2.66ABb	24.54±2.69Ba
	20‒30	33.47±5.38Ab	34.04±2.96Ab	18.84±2.64Aa
pH	0‒10	5.34±0.19Aa	6.54±0.19Aa	5.12±0.06Aa
	10‒20	5.29±0.09Aa	6.52±0.22Aa	5.16±0.05Aa
	20‒30	5.74±0.13Aa	6.62±0.19Aa	5.47±0.08Aa
w_(TN)/ (g∙kg^-1)	0‒10	5.29±0.04Aa	7.36±0.06Aa	6.12±0.07Ba
	10‒20	2.91±0.06Ab	3.52±0.02Ab	3.36±0.03Bb
	20‒30	1.47±0.04Ac	2.46±0.03Ab	1.89±0.03Ac
w_(TP)/ (g∙kg^-1)	0‒10	0.57±0.06Aa	1.10±0.08Ba	0.79±0.07Ab
	10‒20	0.54±0.06Ba	0.73±4.00Aa	0.71±0.06Bb
	20‒30	0.53±0.06Ba	0.62±0.08Aa	0.66±0.03Aa
w_(OM)/ (g∙kg^-1)	0‒10	176.10±29.23Aa	197.77±9.15Aa	184.86±18.61Aa
	10‒20	84.26±13.95Ab	102.02±8.90Ab	83.36±6.09Ab
	20‒30	46.89±6.19Ac	72.22±8.09Ab	62.6±8.84Ab

Study on Species Diversity and Soil Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Broad-leaved Pinus koraiensis Forest

阔叶红松林物种多样性与土壤理化特征研究

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 37

Related Articles 12

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

环境 Environmental	乔木层 Arbors layer				灌木层 Shurb layer				草本层 Herb layer
环境 Environmental	RDA1	RDA2	F	P	RDA1	RDA2	F	P	RDA1	RDA2	F	P
SBD	0.5335	0.2166	3.4	0.042	-0.3084	-0.0680	0.8	0.335	-0.1746	0.0117	0.2	0.662
SWC	-0.1023	-0.2363	0.5	0.654	0.4816	-0.0064	2.1	0.186	-0.7414	0.0112	8.6	0.021
PH	-0.3233	-0.1117	0.9	0.459	0.2206	0.0247	0.4	0.561	-0.4682	0.011	2.0	0.203
TN	0.4904	0.0240	2.2	0.141	-0.0611	-0.0545	<0.1	0.875	-0.6123	-0.0464	4.2	0.076
TP	-0.1039	-0.4331	1.7	0.221	0.6107	-0.0332	4.2	0.045	-0.5226	-0.0025	2.6	0.138
OM	-0.1932	0.1294	0.4	0.675	-0.4566	-0.0418	1.9	0.214	0.6057	-0.0194	4.1	0.096
特征值 Eigenvalues		0.4525	0.2861		0.6241	0.0297			0.8827	0.0077
累计解释变异 Explained variation		45.25	73.86		62.41	65.39			88.27	89.04

[1]	DU Dandan, GAO Ruizhong, FANG Lijing, XIE Longmei. Spatial Variation of Soil Heavy Metals and Their Responses to Physicochemical Factors of Salt Lake Basin in Arid Area [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(6): 1123-1132.
[2]	LI Shanjia, WANG Xingmin, LIU Haifeng, SUN Mengge, LEI Yuxin. Diversity of Desert Plants in Hexi Corridor and Its Response to Environmental Factors [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 429-438.
[3]	ZHANG Lijin, DU Hu, ZENG Fuping, HUANG Guoqin, SONG Min, SONG Tongqing. Discussion on the Relationship between Productivity and Diversity during Vegetation Restoration in the Karst Peak-cluster Depression [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(1): 26-35.
[4]	MA Huiying, LI Xinzhu, MA Xinyu, GONG Lu. Characteristics and Driving Factors of Soil Organic Carbon Fractions under Different Vegetation Types of the mid-Northern Piedmont of the Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(6): 1124-1131.
[5]	FENG Ling, YU Lifei, WANG Yang, ZHANG Limin, ZHAO Qing, LI Fangbing. The Effects of the Functional Redundancy and Functional Diversity on the Community Stability in Different Stages of the Plant Communities Restoration in Karst Vegetation [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(4): 670-678.
[6]	HU Jingda, ZHOU Haiju, HUANG Yongzhen, YAO Xianyu, YE Shaoming, YU Sufang. A Study on Plant Species Diversity and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen in Different Cunninghamia lanceolata Stand Types [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(3): 451-459.
[7]	HAN Xin, YUAN Chunyang, LI Jihong, HONG Zongwen, LIU Xuan, DU Ting, LI Han, YOU Chenming, TAN Bo, ZHU Peng, XU Zhenfeng. Effects of Tree Species and Soil Layers on Soil Extractable Nitrogen Content [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(11): 2143-2151.
[8]	HE Bin, LI Qing, CHEN Qunli, LI Wangjun, YOU Ping. Altitudinal Pattern of Species Diversity of Pseudotsuga sinensis Communty in Northwestern Guizhou, China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(6): 1111-1120.
[9]	PAN Hongli, LI Huichao, YU Zhixiang, CAL Lei, LI Xuhua, LIU Xingliang. Plant Composition and Diversity of Invasive Communities of Lantana camara in Panzhihua City [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(6): 1177-1182.
[10]	HUANG Cheng, WU Yueying, JI Hengkuan, CHEN Liming, LI Beiying, FU Chuanliang, LI Jianhong, WU Weidong, WU Zhipeng. Response of Iron Reduction Characteristics to DOM Molecular Properties under Anaerobic Conditions in Typical Paddy Soils of Hainan Island [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(5): 957-967.
[11]	JIANG Nihao, ZHANG Shihan. Interspecific Association and Environmental Interpretation of Dominant Herbaceous Species in Pinus yunnanensis Forest in the Western Suburbs of Chuxiong City [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(11): 2109-2120.
[12]	LIN Li, DAI Lei, LIN Zebei, WU Jitong, YAN Wei, WANG Zhijie. Plant Diversity and Its Relationship with Soil Physicochemical Properties of Urban Forest Communities in Central Guizhou [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(11): 2130-2141.