Plant Diversity and Its Relationship with Soil Physicochemical Properties of Urban Forest Communities in Central Guizhou

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.11.003

Ecology and Environment ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 2130-2141.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.11.003

Special Issue: 生物多样性专题汇编

• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles

Plant Diversity and Its Relationship with Soil Physicochemical Properties of Urban Forest Communities in Central Guizhou

LIN Li¹(), DAI Lei¹, LIN Zebei², WU Jitong², YAN Wei², WANG Zhijie¹^,³^,^*()

1. College of Life Sciences, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
2. Forestry and Grassland Resources Monitoring Center of Guiyang City, Guiyang 550025, China
3. Collaborative Innovation Center for Mountain Ecology and Agricultural Bioengineering, Guiyang 550025, China

Received:2021-05-26 Online:2021-11-18 Published:2021-12-29
Contact: WANG Zhijie

黔中城市森林群落植物多样性及其与土壤理化性质的关系

林丽¹(), 代磊¹, 林泽北², 吴际通², 颜伟², 王志杰¹^,³^,^*()

1.贵州大学生命科学学院,贵州贵阳 550025
2.贵阳市林草资源监测中心,贵州贵阳 550025
3.山地生态与农业生物工程协同创新中心,贵州贵阳 550025

通讯作者: 王志杰
作者简介:林丽（1993年生）,女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为修复生态。E-mail: 1292364928@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42061039);国家自然科学基金项目(41701319);贵州大学培育项目(贵大培育[2020]46);贵阳市森林资源管理站技术服务项目(H20200129);贵州省生物学一流学科建设项目(GNYL[2017]009)

Abstract

Abstract:

Taking ten typical urban forest communities in Guiyang as research objects, based on field sampling survey and laboratory test, the differences of plant diversity and soil physicochemical properties in different urban forest communities in Guiyang were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. The effects of soil physicochemical properties on plant diversity and species distribution in different urban forest communities in Guiyang city were studied by using redundancy analysis and canonical correspondence analysis, aiming to provide important scientific basis and theoretical support for ecological protection and maintenance of urban forest plant diversity in Guiyang city and even Karst urban forest in southwest China. The results showed that: (1) There are 61 families, 107 genera, and 124 species of vascular plants totally. The plant species with the highest important values were different at different layers in different types of urban forests. The composition of the Mixed Plantation of Ligustrum lucidum and Betula alnoides mixed forest the most abundant, and the Pinus massoniana forest is the lowest. (2) The Shannon-Wiener index, richness index, and Pielou evenness index of various urban forest communities are the highest in Ligustrum lucidum mixed forest, and the diversity indexes of the Pinus massoniana forest is the lowest. There is a significant difference between the diversity indexes of the Pinus massoniana forest and the diversity indexes of Ligustrum lucidum mixed forest. The diversity index changes of shrub layer and community were similar, the Shannon-Wiener index and richness index of herb layer were the highest in Pinus massoniana and Pinus armandii mixed forest while the Pielou evenness index was the highest in Cinnamomum camphorum forest, and the three indexes were the lowest in Pinus massoniana forest, while the change of Simpson dominance index was opposite to the other three indexes. (3) Different urban forest communities of soil pH, total phosphorus, total potassium, available potassium, available phosphorus, bulk density has significant difference, but no significant difference of total nitrogen, available nitrogen, organic matter, among them, the soil pH on species distribution and the shrub layer has a significant influence species diversity, soil bulk density has significant effect on species distribution and herbaceous species diversity, Soil available potassium had no significant effect on species distribution, but had significant effect on community species diversity, while soil organic matter and total phosphorus, were opposite.

Key words: urban forest communities, plant diversity, species distribution, soil physicochemical properties, redundancy analysis, canonical correspondence analysis

摘要：

以贵阳市10种典型城市森林群落为研究对象,在野外抽样调查和实验室检测的基础上,采用单因素方差分析,分析了贵阳市不同城市森林群落植物多样性和土壤理化性质的差异,运用冗余分析和典范对应分析,探讨了贵阳市不同城市森林群落土壤理化性质对植物多样性及物种分布的影响,旨在为贵阳市乃至中国西南喀斯特城市森林生态保护、城市森林植物多样性维护提供重要科学依据和理论支撑。结果表明,（1）研究区有维管植物61科、107属、124种,不同类型城市森林群落不同层间重要值最高的物种不同,女贞桦木混交林物种组成丰富,马尾松林物种组成最贫乏。（2）各种城市森林群落物种Shannon-Wiener指数、丰富度指数和Pielou均匀度指数均以女贞桦木混交林最大,马尾松林最小,且二者相应的多样性指数间差异显著;灌木层与群落多样性指数变化相似,草本层Shannon-Wiener指数和丰富度指数以马尾松华山松混交林最大,Pielou均匀度指数以香樟林最大,且3个指数均以马尾松林最小,而Simpson优势度指数变化与其他3个指数变化相反。（3）不同城市森林群落的土壤pH、全磷、全钾、速效钾、速效磷、容重具有显著差异,而全氮、速效氮、有机质差异不显著,其中,土壤pH对物种分布及灌木层物种多样性有显著影响、土壤容重对物种分布及草本物种多样性有显著影响,土壤速效钾对物种分布影响不显著,但对群落物种多样性有显著影响,而土壤有机质、全磷则与之相反。

关键词: 城市森林群落, 植物多样性, 物种分布, 土壤理化性质, 冗余分析, 典范对应分析

CLC Number:

Q948
X176

LIN Li, DAI Lei, LIN Zebei, WU Jitong, YAN Wei, WANG Zhijie. Plant Diversity and Its Relationship with Soil Physicochemical Properties of Urban Forest Communities in Central Guizhou[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(11): 2130-2141.

林丽, 代磊, 林泽北, 吴际通, 颜伟, 王志杰. 黔中城市森林群落植物多样性及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(11): 2130-2141.

Figures/Tables 8

References 61

[1]	GUISAN A, ZIMMERMANN N E, et al., 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology[J]. Ecological Modelling, 135(2-3): 147-186. DOI URL
[2]	LIU L B, NI J, 2020. Variations of the biodiversity and carbon functions of Karst forests in two morphologically different sites in Southwestern China[J]. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution, 67(1-2): 9-16. DOI URL
[3]	PYSEK P, LEPS J, 1992. Response of a weed community to nitrogen fertilization: a multivariate analysis[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science; 2(2): 237-244. DOI URL
[4]	WEIGEL R, GILLES J, KLISZ M, et al., 2019. Forest understory vegetation is more related to soil than to climate towards the cold distribution margin of European beech[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 30(4): 746-755. DOI URL
[5]	ROSEN Z, MICHAEL L, 1995. Species diversity in space and time Speciation[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 87-111.
[6]	YU M, SUN O J X, 2013. Effects of forest patch type and site on herb-layer vegetation in a temperate forest ecosystem[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 300(1): 14-20. DOI URL
[7]	安明态, 2019. 喀斯特森林土壤水分和养分格局及其植物物种多样性维持机制研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学: 1-256.
	AN M T, 2019. Studies on maintenance mechanism of plant species diversity and soil moisture and nutrient pattern in Karst forest[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University: 1-256.
[8]	陈晓熹, 杨新东, 曾献兴, 等, 2019. 环境因子对青云山自然保护区森林群落物种分布的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 38(12): 3642-3650.
	CHEN X X, YANG X D, ZENG X X, et al., 2019. Influences of environmental factors on species distribution in forest community in Wengyuan Qingyunshan Nature Reserve Guangdong[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 38(12): 3642-3650.
[9]	崔宁洁, 张丹桔, 刘洋, 等, 2014. 不同林龄马尾松人工林林下植物多样性与土壤理化性质[J]. 生态学杂志, 33(10): 2610-2617.
	CUI N J, ZHANG D J, LIU Y, et al., 2014. Plant diversity and soil physicochemical properties under different aged Pinus massoniana plantations[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 33(10): 2610-2617.
[10]	范得芳, 王得祥, 柴宗政, 等, 2016. 环境因子对秦岭锐齿栎群落物种分布及多样性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 44(10): 59-67.
	FAN D F, WANG D X, CHAI Z Z, et al., 2016. Effects of environmental factors on species distribution and diversity of Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata community in Qinling Mountains[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 44(10): 59-67.
[11]	方精云, 王襄平, 沈泽昊, 等, 2009. 植物群落清查的主要内容、方法和技术规范[J]. 生物多样性, 17(6): 533-548.
	FANG J Y, WANG X P, SHEN Z H, et al., 2009. Methods and protocols for plant community inventory[J]. Biodiversity Science, 17(6): 533-548. DOI URL
[12]	高贤明, 马克平, 陈灵芝, 等, 2001. 暖温带若干落叶阔叶林群落物种多样性及其与群落动态的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 25(3): 283-290.
	GAO X M, MA K P, CHEN L Z, et al., 2001. Species diversity of some deciduous broad-leaved forests in the warm-temperate zone and its relations to community stability[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 25(3): 283-290.
[13]	郭春秀, 姚拓, 马俊梅, 等, 2017. 石羊河下游不同类型荒漠草地黑果枸杞群落结构及物种多样性特征[J]. 草地学报, 25(3): 529-537.
	GUO C X, YAO T, MA J M, et al., 2017. Characteristics and species diversity of lycium ruthenicum on different types of desert grassland in Shiyang River[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 25(3): 529-537.
[14]	姜俊, 刘宪钊, 贾宏炎, 等, 2019. 杉木人工林近自然化改造对林下植被多样性和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 41(5): 170-177.
	JIANG J, LIU X Z, JIA H Y, et al., 2019. Effects of stand density on understory species diversity and soil physicochemical properties after close-to-nature transformation management of Chinese fir plantation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 41(5): 170-177.
[15]	雷斯越, 2019. 不同地形条件下退耕草地植被恢复与土壤理化性质分异特征[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学: 1-46.
	LEI S Y, 2019. Vegetation restoration with soil physical and chemical properties distribution characteristics of converted grassland in different topographic conditions[D]: Yangling: Northwest A & F University: 1-46.
[16]	李海梅, 何兴元, 陈玮, 等, 2004. 中国城市森林研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 生态学杂志, 23(2): 55-59.
	LI H M, HE X Y, CHEN W, et al., 2004. Current situations and trend of investigations on urban forest in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology 23(2): 55-59.
[17]	李芹, 容丽, 王敏, 2019. 地形对喀斯特山地植物物种多样性及分布格局的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 39(6): 27-34.
	LI Q, RONG L, WANG M, 2019. Effects of topography on diversity and distribution pattern of plant species in Karst Mountains Area[J]. Bulletion of Soil and Water Conservation, 39(6): 27-34.
[18]	李婷婷, 唐永彬, 周润惠, 等, 2021. 云顶山不同人工林林下植物多样性及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 生态学报, 41(3): 1168-1177.
	LI T T, TANG Y B, ZHOU R H, et al., 2021. Understory plant diversity and its relationship with soil physicochemical properties in different plantations in Yunding Mountain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(3): 1168-1177.
[19]	罗楠, 舒英格, 陈梦军, 等, 2020. 喀斯特山区不同草地土壤结构及分形特征[J]. 草业学报, 29(7): 11-22.
	LUO N, SHU Y G, CHEN M J, et al., 2020. Soil structure and fractal characteristics of different land categories in a Karst Rocky Desertification Area[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 29(7): 11-22.
[20]	罗巧玉, 王彦龙, 杜雷, 等, 2021. 黄河源区发草适生地植物群落特征及其土壤因子解释[J]. 草业学报, 30(4): 80-89.
	LUO Q Y, WANG Y L, DU L, et al., 2021. Plant community diversity and soil factor interpretation of adaptive region of Deschampsia caespitosa in the source region of the Yellow River[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 30(4): 80-89.
[21]	吕倩, 康文斯, 郭茂金, 等, 2019. 柏木人工林目标树经营初期对林下植物多样性及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 25(5): 1036-1043.
	LV Q, KANG W S, GUO M J, et al., 2019. Early effects of target tree management on undergrowth plant diversity and soil physicochemical properties in Cupressus funebris plantations[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 25(5): 1036-1043.
[22]	马杰, 贾宝全, 张文, 等, 2019. 北京市六环内城市森林结构总体特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 38(8): 2318-2325.
	MA J, JIA B Q, ZHANG W, et al., 2019. The characteristics of urban forest structure within the Sixth Ring Road of Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 38(8): 2318-2325.
[23]	郝建锋, 王德艺, 李艳, 等, 2014. 人为干扰对川西金凤山楠木次生林群落结构和物种多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 34(23): 6930-6942.
	HAO J F, WANG D Y, LI Y, et al., 2014. Effects of human disturbance on species diversity of Phoebe zhennan communitis in Jinfengshan Moutain in western Sichuan[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(23): 6930-6942.
[24]	马天舒, 丁伟林, 肖复明, 等, 2020. 不同年龄阶段陈山红心杉人工林土壤理化性质[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 40(12): 114-124.
	MA T S, DING W L, XIAO F M, et al., 2020. The soil physical and chemical properties in different stand ages of Chenshan red-heart Chinese fir[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 40(12): 114-124.
[25]	马志波, 肖文发, 黄清麟, 等, 2016. 森林群落多样性与空间格局研究综述[J]世界林业研究, 29(3): 35-39.
	MA Z B, XIAO W F, HUANG Q L, et al., 2016. A Review of Diversity and Spatial Pattern of Forest Community[J]. World Forestry Research, 29(3): 35-39.
[26]	孟庆欣, 2020. 太行山植物群落多样性分布格局及其对环境因子的响应[D]. 太原: 山西大学: 1-69.
	MENG Q X, 2020. Distribution patterns and its response to environmental factors of plant communities in Taihang Mountains[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi university: 1-69.
[27]	秦晓佳, 丁贵杰, 2012. 低磷胁迫对不同种源马尾松幼苗氮钾吸收与利用的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 32(4): 32-36.
	QIN X J, DING G J, 2012. Effects of low phosphorus stress on absorption and utilization of nitrogen and potassium in different provenances Pinus massoniana seedlings[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 32(4): 32-36.
[28]	任学敏, 杨改河, 王得祥, 等, 2012. 环境因子对巴山冷杉-糙皮桦混交林物种分布及多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 32(2): 605-613.
	REN X M, YANG G H, WANG D X, et al., 2012. Effects of environmental factors on species distribution and diversity in an Abies fargesii-Betula utilis mixed forest[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(2): 605-613. DOI URL
[29]	戎建涛, 张晓红, 郜爱玲, 等, 2019. 不同间伐强度经营对柳杉人工林土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 34(4): 206-211.
	RONG J T, ZHANG X H, GAO A L, et al., 2019. Effects of different thinning intensity managements on soil physicochemical properties of cryptomeria fortunei plantations[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 34(4): 206-211.
[30]	邵方丽, 余新晓, 郑江坤, 等, 2012. 北京山区防护林优势树种分布与环境的关系[J]. 生态学报, 32(19): 6092-6099.
	SHAO F L, YU X X, ZHENG J K, et al., 2012. Relationships between dominant arbor species distribution and environmental factors of shelter forests in the Beijing Mountain Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(19): 6092-6099. DOI URL
[31]	司彬, 姚小华, 任华东, 等, 2008. 黔中喀斯特植被自然演替过程中物种组成及多样性研究--以贵州省普定县为例[J]. 林业科学研究, 21(5): 669-674.
	SI B, YAO X H, REN H D, et al., 2008. Species composition and diversity in the process of natural succession of Karst vegetation in central Guizhou: case study of Puding country in Guizhou[J]. Forest Research, 21(5): 669-674.
[32]	孙千惠, 吴霞, 王媚臻, 等, 2018. 林分密度对马尾松林林下物种多样性和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 29(3): 732-738.
	SUN Q H, WU X, WANG M Z, et al., 2018. Effects of stand density on understory species diversity and soil physicochemical properties of Pinus massoniana plantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29(3): 732-738.
[33]	陶晓, 樊伟, 杨春, 等, 2016. 城市不同森林土壤溶解性有机碳和微生物生物量碳特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 35(12): 3191-3196.
	TAO X, FAN W, YANG C, et al., 2016. Characteristics of soil dissolved organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon in different urban forest communities[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 35(12): 3191-3196.
[34]	汪超, 王孝安, 郭华, 等, 2006. 黄土高原马栏林区主要森林群落物种多样性研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 24(4): 791-797.
	WANG C, WANG X A, GUO H, et al., 2006. Species diversities of major communities in Malan forest region of the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Botanica Boredli-Occidentalia Sinica, 24(4): 791-797.
[35]	汪攀, 王霖娇, 盛茂银, 等, 2018. 西南喀斯特石漠化生态系统植物多样性、土壤生态化学计量特征及其相关性分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 49(10): 1959-1969.
	WANG P, WANG L J, SHENG M Y, et al., 2018. Plant diversity ecological stoichiometry characteristics of soils and their correlation of the Karst rocky desertification ecosystem in southwestern China[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 49(10): 1959-1969.
[36]	王凯博, 陈美玲, 秦娟, 等, 2007. 子午岭植被自然演替中植物多样性变化及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 西北植物学报, 27(10): 2089-2096.
	WANG K B, CHEN M L, QIN J, et al., 2007. Plant species diversity and the relation with soil properties in natural succession process in Ziwuling Area[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 27(10): 2089-2096.
[37]	王玲, 2020. 林分密度对油松人工林群落结构和植物多样性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 29(12): 2328-2336.
	WANG L, 2020. Effects of different stand densities on community structure and species diversity of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 29(12): 2328-2336.
[38]	王世雄, 王孝安, 李国庆, 等, 2010. 陕西子午岭植物群落演替过程中物种多样性变化与环境解释[J]. 生态学报, 30(6): 1638-1647.
	WANG S X, WANG X A, LI G Q, et al., 2010. Species diversity and environmental interpretation in the process of community succession in the Ziwu Mountain of Shaanxi Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30(6): 1638-1647.
[39]	王岩, 李玉灵, 石娟华, 等, 2012. 不同植被恢复模式对铁尾矿物种多样性及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 26(3): 112-117.
	WANG Y, LI Y L, SHI J H, et al., 2012. Effect of different vegetation restoration measures on the species diversity and soil properties of Iron Tailings[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 26(3): 112-117.
[40]	魏晨辉, 沈光, 裴忠雪, 等, 2015. 不同植物种植对松嫩平原盐碱地土壤理化性质与细根生长的影响[J]. 植物研究, 35(5): 759-764.
	WEI C H, SHEN G, PEI Z X, et al., 2015. Effects of different plants cultivation on soil physical-chemical properties and fine root growth in saline-alkaline soil in Songnen Plain, Northeastern China[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research 35(5): 759-764.
[41]	温佩颖, 金光泽, 2019. 地形对阔叶红松林物种多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 39(3): 945-956.
	WEN P Y, JIN G Z, 2019. Effects of topography on species diversity in a typical mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(3): 945-956.
[42]	肖德荣, 田昆, 袁华, 等, 2007. 滇西北高原典型退化湿地纳帕海植物群落景观多样性[J]. 生态学杂志, 26(8): 1171-1176.
	XIAO D R, TIAN K, YUAN H, et al., 2007. Landscape diversity of Napahai wetland plant community in Northwest Yunnan of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 26(8): 1171-1176.
[43]	闫宝龙, 赵清格, 张波, 等, 2017. 不同植被类型对土壤理化性质和土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 26(2): 189-195.
	YAN B L, ZHAO Q G, ZHANG B, et al., 2017. Effects of different vegetation types on soil physicochemical properties and soil respiration[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 26(2): 189-195.
[44]	闫玮明, 孙冰, 裴男才, 等, 2019. 粤北阔叶人工林和次生林植物多样性与土壤理化性质相关性研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 28(5): 898-907.
	YAN W M, SUN B, PEI N C, et al., 2019. Correlation analyses on plant diversity and soil physical-chemical properties between evergreen broad-leaved plantations and natural secondary forests in North Guangdong, China[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 28(5): 898-907.
[45]	杨崇曜, 李恩贵, 陈慧颖, 等, 2017. 内蒙古西部自然植被的物种多样性及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 25(12): 1303-1312. DOI
	YANG C Y, LI E G, CHEN H Y, et al., 2017. Biodiversity of natural vegetation and influencing factors in western Inner Mongolia[J]. Biodiversity Science, 25(12): 1303-1312. DOI URL
[46]	杨振奇, 秦富仓, 张晓娜, 等, 2018. 砒砂岩区不同立地类型人工沙棘林下草本物种多样性环境解释[J]. 生态学报, 38(14): 5132-5140.
	YANG Z Q, QIN F C, ZHANG X N, et al., 2018. Environmental interpretation of herb species diversity under different site types of Hippophae rhamnoides forest in feldspathic sandstone region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(14): 5132-5140.
[47]	喻理飞, 朱守谦, 叶镜中, 等, 2002. 退化喀斯特森林自然恢复过程中群落动态研究[J]. 林业科学, 38(1): 1-7.
	YU L F, ZHU S Q, YE J Z, et al., 2002. Dynamics of a degraded Karst forest in the process of natural restoration[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 38(1): 1-7.
[48]	余飞燕, 叶鑫, 周润惠, 等, 2021. 金马河温江段河岸带不同生境植物物种多样性与土壤理化性质的动态变化[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 29(1): 1-8.
	YU F Y, YE X, ZHOU R H, et al., 2021. Dynamic Changes in Plant Diversity and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Different Habitats in Wenjiang Section of Jinma River[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 29(1): 1-8.
[49]	张芳, 杜虎, 曾馥平, 等, 2020. 西南喀斯特峰丛洼地木本植物群落结构与多样性变化[J]. 生态学报, 40(12): 4094-4104.
	ZHANG F, DU H, ZENG F P, et al., 2020. Changes of woody community structure and diversity in Karst peak-cluster depression in southwest China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(12): 4094-4104.
[50]	张涵丹, 康希睿, 邵文豪, 等, 2021. 不同类型杉木人工林林下草本植物多样性特征[J]. 生态学报, 41(6): 2118-2128.
	ZHANG H D, KANG X R, SHAO W H, et al., 2021. Characteristics of herbaceous plant biodiversity in Cunninghamia lanceolate plantations with different community structures[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(6): 2118-2128.
[51]	张柳桦, 齐锦秋, 柳苹玉, 等, 2018. 林分密度对桉树人工林群落结构和物种多样性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 38(1): 166-175.
	ZHANG L H, QI J Q, LIU P Y, et al., 2018. Effects of stand density on community structure and species diversity of Eucalyptus robusta plantation[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 38(1): 166-175.
[52]	张起鹏, 2019. 地形对高寒草甸植物多样性影响的多层次分析--以合作市为例[D]. 南京: 南京师范大学: 1-135.
	ZHANG Q P, 2019. Effects of topography on plant diversity patterns in alpine meadow using Multi-scaleanalysis: Taking Hezuo city as an example[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University: 1-135.
[53]	张文, 张建利, 周玉锋, 2011. 喀斯特山地草地植物群落结构与相似性特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 20(5): 843-848.
	ZHANG W, ZHANG J L, ZHOU Y F, 2011. The plant community structure & similarity trait of the Karst Mountain grassland[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 20(5): 843-848.
[54]	张文华, 2011. 喀斯特森林植被种群生态学与群落稳定性分析[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学: 1-191.
	ZHANG W H, 2011. Ecological research on population and community stability in Karst forest vegetation[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University: 1-191.
[55]	赵娜, 鲁绍伟, 李少宁, 等, 2018. 北京松山自然保护区典型植物群落物种多样性研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 38(11): 2120-2128.
	ZHAO N, LU S W, LI S N, et al., 2018. Study on plant diversity of typical plant communities in Songshan Nature Reserve Beijing[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 38(11): 2120-2128.
[56]	赵耀, 王百田, 2018a. 晋西黄土区不同林地植物多样性研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 40(9): 45-54.
	ZHAO Y, WANG B T, 2018. Plant diversity of different forestland in the Loess region of western Shanxi Province, Northern China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 40(9): 45-54.
[57]	赵耀, 王百田, 李萌, 等, 2018b. 晋西吕梁山区3种森林碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 24(3): 518-524.
	ZHAO Y, WANG B T, LI M, et al., 2018. Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in three forests in the Lüliang Mountainous Area of Shanxi Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 24(3): 518-524.
[58]	郑鸾, 龙翠玲, 2020. 茂兰喀斯特森林不同地形植物多样性与土壤理化特征研究[J]. 广西植物, 40(6): 792-801.
	ZHENG L, LONG C L, 2020. Differences of plant diversity and soil physicochemical properties in Maolan Karst forest under different topographic conditions[J]. Guangxi Sciences, 40(6): 792-801.
[59]	曾亚兰, 李绍才, 孙海龙, 2021. 四川盆周山地5种典型林分土壤理化性质比较[J]. 南方农业, 15(4): 25-29.
	ZENG Y L, LI S C, SUN H L, 2021. Comparison of soil physical and chemical properties of five typical forests in the mountainous regions around Sichuan Basin[J]. South China Agriculture, 15(4): 25-29.
[60]	朱宏光, 熊江波, 尤业民, 等, 2014. 不同更新方式巨尾桉林下植物群落变化及其环境解释[J]. 广西科学, 21(5): 469-476.
	ZHU H G, XIONG J B, YOU Y M, et al., 2014. Changes in understory plant community of eucalyptus grandis×E. urophylla plantation in different regeneration modes and associated environment explanations[J]. Guangxi Sciences, 21(5): 469-476.
[61]	朱守谦, 杨世逸, 1987. 茂兰喀斯特森林科学考察集[M]. 贵阳: 贵州人民出版社: 210-224.
	ZHU S Q, YANG S Y, 1987. Scientific survey of the Maolan Karst forest[M]. Guiyang: Guizhou People’s Publishing House: 210-224.

群落号 CID	群落类型 Community types	海拔 Altitude/m	经度和纬度 Longitude and Latitude	样地 Sample plot	坡度 Slope/(°)	坡向 Aspect	坡位 Slope position
Ⅰ	马尾松华山松混交林 Pinus massoniana and Pinus armandiimixed forest	1359	106°66′21.35″E 26°67′12.36″N	1, 3	6, 12	南、西南 South, Southwest	中坡 Middle slope
Ⅱ	马尾松林 Pinus massoniana forest	1302	106°66′80.27″E 26°66′80.44″N	6, 12	14	南 South	中坡 Middle slope
Ⅲ	华山松混交林 Pinus armandii mixed forest	1322	106°67′27.37″E 26°66′78.89″N	2, 5	3, 8	西北 Northwest	中坡 Middle slope
Ⅳ	华山松林 Pinus armandii forest	1293	106°66′55.36″E 26°66′53.29″N	4	35	南 South	中坡 Middle slope
Ⅴ	女贞林 Ligustrum lucidum forest	1174	106°66′52.41″E 26°66′85.28″N	7	20	北 North	中坡 Middle slope
Ⅵ	女贞桦木混交林 Ligustrum lucidum and Betula alnoides mixed forest	1128	106°66′00.70″E 26°66′18.46″N	8	7	北 North	上坡 Upper slope
Ⅶ	桦木混交林 Betula alnoides mixed forest	1243	106°69′75.56″E 26°61′30.83″N	9	9	南 South	下坡 lower slope
Ⅷ	杉木林 Cunninghamia lanceolata forest	1288	106°70′54.24″E 26°63′52.86″N	10	8	东 East	上坡 Upper slope
Ⅸ	柳杉林 Cryptomeria japonica forest	1210	106°67′43.34″E 26°64′78.75″N	11	0	无坡向 No aspect	平地 Flat ground
Ⅹ	香樟林 Cinnamomum longepaniculatum forest	1293	106°67′80.74″E 26°54′17.16″N	13	1	无坡向 No aspect	平地 Flat ground

群落号 CID	群落类型 Community types	海拔 Altitude/m	经度和纬度 Longitude and Latitude	样地 Sample plot	坡度 Slope/(°)	坡向 Aspect	坡位 Slope position
Ⅰ	马尾松华山松混交林 Pinus massoniana and Pinus armandiimixed forest	1359	106°66′21.35″E 26°67′12.36″N	1, 3	6, 12	南、西南 South, Southwest	中坡 Middle slope
Ⅱ	马尾松林 Pinus massoniana forest	1302	106°66′80.27″E 26°66′80.44″N	6, 12	14	南 South	中坡 Middle slope
Ⅲ	华山松混交林 Pinus armandii mixed forest	1322	106°67′27.37″E 26°66′78.89″N	2, 5	3, 8	西北 Northwest	中坡 Middle slope
Ⅳ	华山松林 Pinus armandii forest	1293	106°66′55.36″E 26°66′53.29″N	4	35	南 South	中坡 Middle slope
Ⅴ	女贞林 Ligustrum lucidum forest	1174	106°66′52.41″E 26°66′85.28″N	7	20	北 North	中坡 Middle slope
Ⅵ	女贞桦木混交林 Ligustrum lucidum and Betula alnoides mixed forest	1128	106°66′00.70″E 26°66′18.46″N	8	7	北 North	上坡 Upper slope
Ⅶ	桦木混交林 Betula alnoides mixed forest	1243	106°69′75.56″E 26°61′30.83″N	9	9	南 South	下坡 lower slope
Ⅷ	杉木林 Cunninghamia lanceolata forest	1288	106°70′54.24″E 26°63′52.86″N	10	8	东 East	上坡 Upper slope
Ⅸ	柳杉林 Cryptomeria japonica forest	1210	106°67′43.34″E 26°64′78.75″N	11	0	无坡向 No aspect	平地 Flat ground
Ⅹ	香樟林 Cinnamomum longepaniculatum forest	1293	106°67′80.74″E 26°54′17.16″N	13	1	无坡向 No aspect	平地 Flat ground

群落号 CID	Shannon-Wiener 指数 Shannon-Wiener index	丰富度指数 Richness index	Simpson 指数 Simpson index	Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou index
Ⅰ	1.40±0.44a	5.50±2.26a	0.32±0.13d	0.86±0.10a
Ⅱ	0.58±0.46e	2.18±1.22e	0.57±0.30a	0.60±0.44b
Ⅲ	1.24±0.47abc	4.59±2.42abc	0.35±0.19cd	0.86±0.23a
Ⅳ	0.98±0.65abcd	4.09±3.42abcd	0.48±0.27abc	0.76±0.29ab
Ⅴ	1.22±0.52abc	4.73±2.05abc	0.38±0.24bcd	0.84±0.20ab
Ⅵ	1.45±0.33a	5.63±2.06a	0.29±0.13d	0.88±0.15a
Ⅶ	1.31±0.40ab	5.00±2.05ab	0.34±0.14cd	0.86±0.13a
Ⅷ	0.89±0.52cde	3.55±1.75bcde	0.52±0.24ab	0.71±0.29ab
Ⅸ	0.68±0.56de	2.54±1.37de	0.61±0.30a	0.62±0.42b
Ⅹ	0.91±0.43bcde	3.09±1.22cde	0.46±0.19abcd	0.87±0.23ab

群落号 CID	Shannon-Wiener 指数 Shannon-Wiener index	丰富度指数 Richness index	Simpson 指数 Simpson index	Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou index
Ⅰ	1.40±0.44a	5.50±2.26a	0.32±0.13d	0.86±0.10a
Ⅱ	0.58±0.46e	2.18±1.22e	0.57±0.30a	0.60±0.44b
Ⅲ	1.24±0.47abc	4.59±2.42abc	0.35±0.19cd	0.86±0.23a
Ⅳ	0.98±0.65abcd	4.09±3.42abcd	0.48±0.27abc	0.76±0.29ab
Ⅴ	1.22±0.52abc	4.73±2.05abc	0.38±0.24bcd	0.84±0.20ab
Ⅵ	1.45±0.33a	5.63±2.06a	0.29±0.13d	0.88±0.15a
Ⅶ	1.31±0.40ab	5.00±2.05ab	0.34±0.14cd	0.86±0.13a
Ⅷ	0.89±0.52cde	3.55±1.75bcde	0.52±0.24ab	0.71±0.29ab
Ⅸ	0.68±0.56de	2.54±1.37de	0.61±0.30a	0.62±0.42b
Ⅹ	0.91±0.43bcde	3.09±1.22cde	0.46±0.19abcd	0.87±0.23ab

层次 Level	群落号 CID	Shannon-Wiener指数 Shannon-Wiener index	丰富度指数 Richness index	Simpson指数 Simpson index	Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou index
灌木层 Shrub layer	Ⅰ	1.31±0.43a	4.90±0.28a	0.34±0.14b	0.86±0.10a
	Ⅱ	0.49±0.51c	1.80±1.32d	0.51±0.37ab	0.52±0.54b
	Ⅲ	0.98±0.46ab	3.30±1.34bcd	0.43±0.23b	0.82±0.30ab
	Ⅳ	0.77±0.48bc	2.60±1.14cd	0.53±0.28ab	0.73±0.41ab
	Ⅴ	1.19±0.67ab	4.60±2.07abc	0.41±0.33b	0.70±0.41ab
	Ⅵ	1.39±0.35a	5.40±1.14a	0.32±0.18b	0.84±0.20ab
	Ⅶ	1.30±0.50ab	5.00±2.35ab	0.36±0.19b	0.83±0.18ab
	Ⅷ	0.81±0.66abc	3.20±2.28bcd	0.56±0.28ab	0.66±0.40ab
	Ⅸ	0.36±0.35c	1.80±0.84d	0.77±0.23a	0.45±0.44b
	Ⅹ	0.80±0.19abc	2.60±0.89cd	0.48±0.07ab	0.91±0.13a
草本层 Herb layer	Ⅰ	1.48±0.47a	5.80±2.97a	0.29±0.13c	0.89±0.08a
	Ⅱ	0.73±0.41b	2.50±0.97c	0.56±013a	0.76±0.29b
	Ⅲ	1.41±0.37a	4.80±1.61ab	0.28±0.10c	0.94±0.06a
	Ⅳ	1.04±0.80ab	4.00±3.08abc	0.48±0.30ab	0.81±0.18ab
	Ⅴ	1.27±0.46a	4.20±1.79abc	0.33±0.15bc	0.94±0.02a
	Ⅵ	1.43±0.32a	5.00±2.00ab	0.27±0.08c	0.93±0.08a
	Ⅶ	1.30±0.37a	4.40±1.51abc	0.32±0.12bc	0.92±0.04a
	Ⅷ	1.06±0.40ab	3.80±1.48abc	0.43±0.15abc	0.82±0.06ab
	Ⅸ	1.14±0.38ab	3.60±1.14bc	0.36±0.16bc	0.92±0.08a
	Ⅹ	1.15±0.48ab	3.60±1.52bc	0.36±0.18bc	0.95±0.03a

Plant Diversity and Its Relationship with Soil Physicochemical Properties of Urban Forest Communities in Central Guizhou

黔中城市森林群落植物多样性及其与土壤理化性质的关系

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 61

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

群落号 CID	pH	w_(TN)/(g∙kg^-1)	w_(TP)/(g∙kg^-1)	w_(TK)/(g∙kg^-1)	w_(AN)/(mg∙kg^-1)
Ⅰ	5.04±0.78cd	2.45±0.43a	0.59±0.14b	20.21±5.81a	159.68±32.40a
Ⅱ	4.93±0.20cd	2.65±1.16a	0.99±0.45ab	19.28±1.63a	165.40±52.93a
Ⅲ	6.13±0.27b	3.60±0.95a	1.15±0.19ab	18.60±1.75a	218.70±40.83a
Ⅳ	5.81±0.23bc	3.23±0.25a	0.99±0.45ab	16.16±2.01abc	205.42±13.52a
Ⅴ	7.14±0.30a	4.02±0.97a	1.15±0.17ab	15.01±0.77abc	225.87±15.89a
Ⅵ	7.31±0.45a	4.42±1.72a	1.19±0.13ab	17.52±2.15ab	250.31±55.00a
Ⅶ	7.22±0.63a	2.76±1.34a	0.79±0.11b	11.42±0.54bc	177.46±70.43a
Ⅷ	4.62±0.04cd	2.78±0.73a	1.13±0.23ab	10.24±0.46c	191.25±33.46a
Ⅸ	5.57±1.07cd	2.93±2.10a	1.09±0.19ab	11.05±0.66bc	171.53±94.65a
Ⅹ	5.88±0.30bc	2.69±0.13a	1.69±0.71a	15.75±2.05abc	189.28±7.02a
群落号 CID	w_(AP)/(mg∙kg^-1)	w_(AK)/(mg∙kg^-1)	w_(OM)/(g∙kg^-1)	w_(BD)/(g∙cm^-3)
Ⅰ	7.71±1.25b	178.05±51.58a	47.90±10.74a	22.03±12.21ab
Ⅱ	10.47±4.32b	163.92±19.97ab	45.56±17.44a	35.26±22.37ab
Ⅲ	7.21±0.34b	164.80±54.35ab	65.14±16.79a	18.80±8.33ab
Ⅳ	8.75±2.38b	163.00±29.84ab	60.15±4.18a	13.51±5.22b
Ⅴ	173.47±19.59a	135.68±45.31abc	76.83±19.03a	61.58±30.11a
Ⅵ	198.15±43.70a	143.35±14.28abc	84.14±35.25a	30.10±8.90ab
Ⅶ	178.79±64.34a	82.37±4.53bc	51.08±27.27a	32.96±7.37ab
Ⅷ	9.59±1.70b	56.36±7.10c	53.34±15.09a	22.23±3.55ab
Ⅸ	51.96±73.78b	62.55±10.29bc	53.29±39.39a	40.08±17.62ab
Ⅹ	7.93±1.46b	143.14±19.59abc	46.49±2.66a	72.89.11±4.74a

层次 Level	环境因子 Environmental Factors	解释变异量 Explain the amount of variation	伪F统计量 Pseudo F statistic	P
群落Community	pH	28.2	2.50	0.198
	w_(TN)/(g∙kg^-1)	28.0	1.10	0.416
	w_(TP)/(g∙kg^-1)	12.0	2.80	0.120
	w_(TK)/(g∙kg^-1)	13.2	2.60	0.281
	w_(AN)/(mg∙kg^-1)	31.0	12.60	0.008
	w_(AP)/(mg∙kg^-1)	13.1	0.70	0.484
	w_(AK)/(mg∙kg^-1)	20.2	<0.10	1
	w_(OM)/(g∙kg^-1)	32.3	3.80	0.062
	w_(BD)/(g∙cm^-3)	10.4	4.30	0.054
灌木层Shrub layer	pH	41.9	5.80	0.032
	w_(TN)/(g∙kg^-1)	28.7	3.50	0.156
	w_(TP)/(g∙kg^-1)	0.6	<0.11	0.123
	w_(TK)/(g∙kg^-1)	8.2	1.50	0.236
	w_(AN)/(mg∙kg^-1)	30.8	0.30	0.624
	w_(AP)/(mg∙kg^-1)	36.8	1.10	0.136
	w_(AK)/(mg∙kg^-1)	9.3	6.20	0.106
	w_(OM)/(g∙kg^-1)	32.7	3.50	0.156
	w_(BD)/(g∙cm^-3)	2.1	55.90	0.102
草本层Herb layer	pH	10.5	1.50	0.458
	w_(TN)/(g∙kg^-1)	5.0	0.70	0.454
	w_(TP)/(g∙kg^-1)	28.2	3.10	0.011
	w_(TK)/(g∙kg^-1)	9.9	1.20	0.412
	w_(AN)/(mg∙kg^-1)	3.3	2.40	0.180
	w_(AP)/(mg∙kg^-1)	9.3	0.10	0.790
	w_(AK)/(mg∙kg^-1)	7.3	0.20	0.738
	w_(OM)/(g∙kg^-1)	8.9	<0.11	1
	w_(BD)/(g∙cm^-3)	7.9	0.90	0.360

[1]	DU Dandan, GAO Ruizhong, FANG Lijing, XIE Longmei. Spatial Variation of Soil Heavy Metals and Their Responses to Physicochemical Factors of Salt Lake Basin in Arid Area [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(6): 1123-1132.
[2]	LI Yang, HOU Zhiyong, CHEN Wei, YU Xiaoying, XIE Yonghong, HUANG Xin, TAN Peiyang, LI Jicheng, LI Shanglin, YANG Hui. Plant Diversity and Systematic Composition of Alpine Wetlands in Dawei Mountain [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(4): 643-650.
[3]	LI Shanjia, WANG Xingmin, LIU Haifeng, SUN Mengge, LEI Yuxin. Diversity of Desert Plants in Hexi Corridor and Its Response to Environmental Factors [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 429-438.
[4]	WANG Zhe, TIAN Shengni, ZHANG Yongmei, ZHANG Heyu, ZHOU Zhongze. Study on the Plant Community Characteristics of the Estuary of Pai River in Chaohu Lake [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(9): 1823-1831.
[5]	WANG Lixiao, LIU Jinxian, CHAI Baofeng. Response of Soil Bacterial Community and Nitrogen Cycle during the Natural Recovery of Abandoned Farmland in Subalpine of the North China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(8): 1537-1546.
[6]	WANG Lei, WEN Yuanguang, ZHOU Xiaoguo, ZHU Hongguang, SUN Dongjing. Effects of Mixing Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis with Castanopsis hystrix on Understory Vegetation and Soil Properties [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(7): 1340-1349.
[7]	ZHANG Bowen, QIN Juan, REN Zhongming, CHEN Ziqi, YAO Shunjia, LIU Ye, SONG Yanyu. Effects of Slope Aspect on Understory Plant Diversity of Pinus massoniana Pure Forest and Different Coniferous and Broad-leaved Mixed Forest Types in North Subtropical Region [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(6): 1091-1100.
[8]	MA Huiying, LI Xinzhu, MA Xinyu, GONG Lu. Characteristics and Driving Factors of Soil Organic Carbon Fractions under Different Vegetation Types of the mid-Northern Piedmont of the Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(6): 1124-1131.
[9]	CHEN Yao, LI Yunhong, SHAO Yingnan, LIU Yulong, LIU Yankun. Study on Species Diversity and Soil Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Broad-leaved Pinus koraiensis Forest [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(4): 679-687.
[10]	XUAN Jin, LI Zuchan, ZOU Cheng, QIN Zibo, WU Yahua, HUANG Liujing. Multi-scale Effects of Central Bar Landscape Class and Pattern on Plant Diversity in Minjiang River: The Case of Minjiang River Basin (Fuzhou Section) Planning [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(12): 2320-2330.
[11]	HAN Xin, YUAN Chunyang, LI Jihong, HONG Zongwen, LIU Xuan, DU Ting, LI Han, YOU Chenming, TAN Bo, ZHU Peng, XU Zhenfeng. Effects of Tree Species and Soil Layers on Soil Extractable Nitrogen Content [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(11): 2143-2151.
[12]	BAI Haifeng, WANG Yirui, SONG Jinxi, KONG Feihe, ZHANG Xuexian, LI Qi. Characteristics of Plankton Community Structure and Its Relation to Environmental Factors in Weihe River, China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(1): 117-130.
[13]	LIU Xiaoju, CHU Jiangtao, ZHANG Yue, SHAN Qi. Effects of Environmental Factors and Fire Disturbance Factors on Distribution of Chamerion angustifolium in Kanas Taiga [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(1): 37-43.
[14]	CHEN Shuangshuang, ZHU Ninghua, ZHOU Guangyi, YUAN Xingming, SHANG Hai, WANG Yixuan. Vegetation and Soil Physical Characteristics of Artificial Arbor Forests under Different Grades of Rocky Desertification [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(1): 52-61.
[15]	WANG Rui, SONG Xiangyun, LIU Xinwei. Seasonal Characteristics of Soil Enzymes in Different Vegetations in the Yellow River Delta [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(1): 62-69.