生态环境学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 199-208.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.02.004
童玮1(
), 储晓燕2, 童志鹏3, 吴文骁2, 吴家森1,*(
)
收稿日期:2025-07-16
修回日期:2025-11-15
接受日期:2025-12-09
出版日期:2026-02-18
发布日期:2026-02-09
通讯作者:
吴家森
作者简介:童玮(1999年生),女,硕士研究生,主要从事资源利用与植物保护研究。E-mail: 1051311136@qq.com
基金资助:
TONG Wei1(
), CHU Xiaoyan2, TONG Zhipeng3, WU Wenxiao2, WU Jiasen1,*(
)
Received:2025-07-16
Revised:2025-11-15
Accepted:2025-12-09
Online:2026-02-18
Published:2026-02-09
摘要:
以浙江省建德市富春江-新安江国家级风景名胜区常绿落叶混交林为对象,解析其群落结构及种间关系,阐明该群落特征并预测演替方向,旨在为探索该类型森林的正向演替与人为调控提供科学依据。在研究区设置并全面调查1个1 hm2和8个0.04 hm2森林样地中胸径≥1.0 cm的所有木本植物,筛选出重要值≥1%的21个优势种,运用生态位宽度、Pianka生态位重叠指数、方差比率法、X 2检验及随机森林模型,分析物种生态位特征与种间联结性。结果表明,样地中胸径≥1.0 cm的木本植物隶属于36科62属85种;重要值前5位分别为枫香树Liquidambar formosana、黄檀Dalbergia hupeana、檵木Loropetalum chinense、杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata、苦槠Castanopsis sclerophylla。样地中210对Pianka生态位重叠指数(Oik)为2.95×10−3-0.82。X 2检验显示210对种对中,正负联结比例为0.45,优势树种种间关系以负关联和无关联为主。综合X 2检验、随机森林模型分析,表明群落中的枫香树、黄檀、杉木的优势地位呈下降趋势,而常绿阔叶树种将作为最终的优势种。综上,该群落正处于演替中期,尚未达到稳定状态。今后可对苦槠、乌楣栲Castanopsis jucunda、青冈栎Quercus glauca等幼苗进行保育,同时适度补植常绿阔叶树,促进常绿阔叶林顶极群落的及早形成。
中图分类号:
童玮, 储晓燕, 童志鹏, 吴文骁, 吴家森. 基于生态位和随机森林的常绿落叶混交林演替规律研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(2): 199-208.
TONG Wei, CHU Xiaoyan, TONG Zhipeng, WU Wenxiao, WU Jiasen. A Study on the Succession Patterns of Evergreen and Deciduous Mixed Forests Based on Niche and Random Forest[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(2): 199-208.
| 样地号 | 类型 | 海拔/m | 群落类型 | 样地面积/m2 | 经度/° | 纬度/° | 郁闭度 | 优势物种 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 天然林 | 126.8 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 10000 | 119.551919 | 29.615047 | 0.75 | 枫香树Liquidambar formosana |
| 2 | 天然林 | 251.0 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.131376 | 29.439467 | 0.76 | 水杉Metasequoia glyptostroboides |
| 3 | 天然林 | 256.6 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.131764 | 29.439183 | 0.76 | 枫香树Liquidambar formosana |
| 4 | 天然林 | 60.1 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.552923 | 29.612075 | 0.82 | 浙江楠Phoebe chekiangensis |
| 5 | 天然林 | 50.3 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.552950 | 29.612458 | 0.84 | 枫香树Liquidambar formosana |
| 6 | 天然林 | 62.7 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.412834 | 29.535873 | 0.78 | 板栗Castanea mollissima |
| 7 | 天然林 | 71.5 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.412802 | 29.535930 | 0.84 | 檵木Loropetalum chinense |
| 8 | 天然林 | 60.6 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.396718 | 29.524119 | 0.77 | 香樟Camphora officinarum |
| 9 | 天然林 | 80.2 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.396010 | 29.523443 | 0.70 | 香樟Camphora officinarum |
表1 研究区常绿、落叶混交林群落样地基本情况
Table 1 Basic information of the mixed evergreen and deciduous forest community plots in the study area
| 样地号 | 类型 | 海拔/m | 群落类型 | 样地面积/m2 | 经度/° | 纬度/° | 郁闭度 | 优势物种 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 天然林 | 126.8 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 10000 | 119.551919 | 29.615047 | 0.75 | 枫香树Liquidambar formosana |
| 2 | 天然林 | 251.0 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.131376 | 29.439467 | 0.76 | 水杉Metasequoia glyptostroboides |
| 3 | 天然林 | 256.6 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.131764 | 29.439183 | 0.76 | 枫香树Liquidambar formosana |
| 4 | 天然林 | 60.1 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.552923 | 29.612075 | 0.82 | 浙江楠Phoebe chekiangensis |
| 5 | 天然林 | 50.3 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.552950 | 29.612458 | 0.84 | 枫香树Liquidambar formosana |
| 6 | 天然林 | 62.7 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.412834 | 29.535873 | 0.78 | 板栗Castanea mollissima |
| 7 | 天然林 | 71.5 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.412802 | 29.535930 | 0.84 | 檵木Loropetalum chinense |
| 8 | 天然林 | 60.6 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.396718 | 29.524119 | 0.77 | 香樟Camphora officinarum |
| 9 | 天然林 | 80.2 | 常绿落叶混交林 | 400 | 119.396010 | 29.523443 | 0.70 | 香樟Camphora officinarum |
| 模型调优参数 | sp1数量 | sp1胸径 | sp1高度 | sp2数量 | sp2胸径 | sp2高度 | sp4数量 | sp4胸径 | sp4高度 | sp5数量 | sp5胸径 | sp5高度 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最佳特征变量数 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 60 | 60 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 60 | 8 | 2 |
| 均方根误差 | 2.86 | 6.57 | 3.85 | 4.21 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 3.98 | 7.13 | 4.59 | 2.35 | 7.67 | 4.08 |
| 决定系数 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.58 |
表2 优势树种随机森林模型交叉验证调优结果
Table 2 Cross-validation tuning results of the random forest models for dominant tree species
| 模型调优参数 | sp1数量 | sp1胸径 | sp1高度 | sp2数量 | sp2胸径 | sp2高度 | sp4数量 | sp4胸径 | sp4高度 | sp5数量 | sp5胸径 | sp5高度 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 最佳特征变量数 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 60 | 60 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 60 | 8 | 2 |
| 均方根误差 | 2.86 | 6.57 | 3.85 | 4.21 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 3.98 | 7.13 | 4.59 | 2.35 | 7.67 | 4.08 |
| 决定系数 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.58 |
| 编号 | 物种 | 株树 | 平均树高/m | 平均胸径/cm | 分布频数 | 重要值/% | 生态位宽度 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BL | BS | |||||||
| sp1 | 枫香树Liquidambar formosana | 129 | 10.78 | 17.42 | 28 | 18.16 | 19.79 | 3.13 |
| sp2 | 黄檀Dalbergia hupeana | 145 | 7.19 | 8.02 | 24 | 8.89 | 15.54 | 2.93 |
| sp3 | 檵木Loropetalum chinense | 174 | 5.21 | 6.42 | 22 | 8.86 | 13.28 | 2.77 |
| sp4 | 杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata | 90 | 9.01 | 12.81 | 13 | 7.11 | 8.49 | 2.28 |
| sp5 | 苦槠Castanopsis sclerophylla | 61 | 8.49 | 14.40 | 17 | 4.43 | 8.63 | 2.41 |
| sp6 | 乌楣栲Castanopsis jucunda | 60 | 8.46 | 14.35 | 12 | 4.31 | 7.32 | 2.17 |
| sp7 | 木蜡树Toxicodendron sylvestre | 78 | 7.15 | 8.06 | 22 | 4.00 | 16.81 | 2.93 |
| sp8 | 微毛柃Eurya hebeclados | 102 | 4.44 | 4.48 | 21 | 3.76 | 12.88 | 2.74 |
| sp9 | 青冈栎Quercus glauca | 55 | 8.23 | 10.92 | 15 | 3.17 | 8.43 | 2.40 |
| sp10 | 香樟Camphora officinarum | 34 | 11.19 | 22.40 | 11 | 3.07 | 6.72 | 2.09 |
| sp11 | 板栗Castanea mollissima | 36 | 10.72 | 20.10 | 7 | 2.99 | 4.05 | 1.62 |
| sp12 | 山合欢Albizia kalkora | 42 | 8.40 | 11.47 | 16 | 2.34 | 8.17 | 2.42 |
| sp13 | 白栎Quercus fabri | 42 | 6.85 | 8.55 | 12 | 1.92 | 5.28 | 2.00 |
| sp14 | 麻栎Quercus acutissima | 22 | 11.25 | 22.07 | 10 | 1.66 | 8.34 | 2.20 |
| sp15 | 秀丽槭Acer elegantulum | 28 | 8.01 | 16.31 | 5 | 1.66 | 2.82 | 1.22 |
| sp16 | 山矾Symplocos sumuntia | 45 | 4.93 | 5.17 | 13 | 1.63 | 4.88 | 2.03 |
| sp17 | 黄山栾树Koelreuteria bipinnata var. integrifoliola | 28 | 8.61 | 10.55 | 5 | 1.42 | 4.61 | 1.57 |
| sp18 | 水杉Metasequoia glyptostroboides | 15 | 14.13 | 30.46 | 2 | 1.37 | 1.64 | 0.58 |
| sp19 | 化香树Platycarya strobilacea | 20 | 10.85 | 16.22 | 6 | 1.24 | 3.39 | 1.44 |
| Sp20 | 榉树Zelkova serrata | 35 | 4.05 | 3.63 | 9 | 1.12 | 6.48 | 2.00 |
| Sp21 | 山胡椒Lindera glauca | 27 | 5.77 | 5.79 | 8 | 1.02 | 5.93 | 1.90 |
表3 优势物种重要值及生态位宽度
Table 3 Importance values and niche widths of dominant tree species
| 编号 | 物种 | 株树 | 平均树高/m | 平均胸径/cm | 分布频数 | 重要值/% | 生态位宽度 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BL | BS | |||||||
| sp1 | 枫香树Liquidambar formosana | 129 | 10.78 | 17.42 | 28 | 18.16 | 19.79 | 3.13 |
| sp2 | 黄檀Dalbergia hupeana | 145 | 7.19 | 8.02 | 24 | 8.89 | 15.54 | 2.93 |
| sp3 | 檵木Loropetalum chinense | 174 | 5.21 | 6.42 | 22 | 8.86 | 13.28 | 2.77 |
| sp4 | 杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata | 90 | 9.01 | 12.81 | 13 | 7.11 | 8.49 | 2.28 |
| sp5 | 苦槠Castanopsis sclerophylla | 61 | 8.49 | 14.40 | 17 | 4.43 | 8.63 | 2.41 |
| sp6 | 乌楣栲Castanopsis jucunda | 60 | 8.46 | 14.35 | 12 | 4.31 | 7.32 | 2.17 |
| sp7 | 木蜡树Toxicodendron sylvestre | 78 | 7.15 | 8.06 | 22 | 4.00 | 16.81 | 2.93 |
| sp8 | 微毛柃Eurya hebeclados | 102 | 4.44 | 4.48 | 21 | 3.76 | 12.88 | 2.74 |
| sp9 | 青冈栎Quercus glauca | 55 | 8.23 | 10.92 | 15 | 3.17 | 8.43 | 2.40 |
| sp10 | 香樟Camphora officinarum | 34 | 11.19 | 22.40 | 11 | 3.07 | 6.72 | 2.09 |
| sp11 | 板栗Castanea mollissima | 36 | 10.72 | 20.10 | 7 | 2.99 | 4.05 | 1.62 |
| sp12 | 山合欢Albizia kalkora | 42 | 8.40 | 11.47 | 16 | 2.34 | 8.17 | 2.42 |
| sp13 | 白栎Quercus fabri | 42 | 6.85 | 8.55 | 12 | 1.92 | 5.28 | 2.00 |
| sp14 | 麻栎Quercus acutissima | 22 | 11.25 | 22.07 | 10 | 1.66 | 8.34 | 2.20 |
| sp15 | 秀丽槭Acer elegantulum | 28 | 8.01 | 16.31 | 5 | 1.66 | 2.82 | 1.22 |
| sp16 | 山矾Symplocos sumuntia | 45 | 4.93 | 5.17 | 13 | 1.63 | 4.88 | 2.03 |
| sp17 | 黄山栾树Koelreuteria bipinnata var. integrifoliola | 28 | 8.61 | 10.55 | 5 | 1.42 | 4.61 | 1.57 |
| sp18 | 水杉Metasequoia glyptostroboides | 15 | 14.13 | 30.46 | 2 | 1.37 | 1.64 | 0.58 |
| sp19 | 化香树Platycarya strobilacea | 20 | 10.85 | 16.22 | 6 | 1.24 | 3.39 | 1.44 |
| Sp20 | 榉树Zelkova serrata | 35 | 4.05 | 3.63 | 9 | 1.12 | 6.48 | 2.00 |
| Sp21 | 山胡椒Lindera glauca | 27 | 5.77 | 5.79 | 8 | 1.02 | 5.93 | 1.90 |
图1 优势物种Pianks生态位重叠指数 sp1:枫香树;sp2:黄檀;sp3:檵木;sp4:杉木;sp5:苦槠;sp6:乌楣栲;sp7:木蜡树;sp8:微毛柃;sp9:青冈栎;sp10:香樟;sp11:板栗;sp12:山合欢;sp13:白栎;sp14:麻栎;sp15:秀丽槭;sp16:山矾;sp17:黄山栾树;sp18:水杉;sp19:化香树;sp20:榉树;sp21:山胡椒
Figure 1 Pianka niche overlap index for dominant
| 群落 | 方差比率(RV) | 检验统计量(W) | 卡方临界值(0.95,32) | 卡方临界值(0.05,32) | 检验结果 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优势树种 | 2.08 | 68.68 | 18.49 | 43.77 | 显著正联结 |
表4 优势树种总体关联性
Table 4 Overall correlation of dominant tree species
| 群落 | 方差比率(RV) | 检验统计量(W) | 卡方临界值(0.95,32) | 卡方临界值(0.05,32) | 检验结果 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优势树种 | 2.08 | 68.68 | 18.49 | 43.77 | 显著正联结 |
图2 优势物种X 2统计量检验 sp1:枫香树;sp2:黄檀;sp3:檵木;sp4:杉木;sp5:苦槠;sp6:乌楣栲;sp7:木蜡树;sp8:微毛柃;sp9:青冈栎;sp10:香樟;sp11:板栗;sp12:山合欢;sp13:白栎;sp14:麻栎;sp15:秀丽槭;sp16:山矾;sp17:黄山栾树;sp18:水杉;sp19:化香树;sp20:榉树;sp21:山胡椒。“**”为极显著相关(p<0.01),“*”为显著相关(p<0.05),无“*”为不显著相关(p>0.05)
Figure 2 X 2 correlation test of dominant population of dominant tree species
图3 影响建群种生长的关键树种及因子 sp1:枫香树;sp2:黄檀;sp3:檵木;sp4:杉木;sp5:苦槠;sp6:乌楣栲;sp7:木蜡树;sp8:微毛柃;sp9:青冈栎;sp10:香樟;sp11:板栗;sp12:山合欢;sp13:白栎;sp14:麻栎;sp15:秀丽槭;sp16:山矾;sp17:黄山栾树;sp18:水杉;sp19:化香树;sp20:榉树;sp21:山胡椒
Figure 3 Key tree species and factors influencing the growth of dominant species in community establishment
| [1] |
ALTMANN A, TOLOŞI L, SANDER O, et al., 2010. Permutation importance: A corrected feature importance measure[J]. Bioinformatics, 26(10): 1340-1347.
DOI PMID |
| [2] |
BONGERS F J, 2020. Functional-structural plant models to boost understanding of complementarity in light capture and use in mixed-species forests[J]. Basic and Applied Ecology, 48: 92-101.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
COLWELL R K, FUTUYMA D J, 1971. On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap[J]. Ecology, 52(4): 567-576.
DOI PMID |
| [4] |
CUTLER D R, EDWARDS T C J R, BEARD K H, et al., 2007. Random forests for classification in ecology[J]. Ecology, 88(11): 2783-2792.
DOI PMID |
| [5] |
DAI Z T, FAN Y F, LI Y J, et al., 2025. Global patterns and environmental drives of nitrite/nitrate-dependent anaerobic methane oxidation across natural ecosystems[J]. Global Change Biology, 31(7): e70350.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
FAVARETTO V F, MARTINEZ C A, SORIANI H H, et al., 2011. Differential responses of antioxidant enzymes in pioneer and late-successional tropical tree species grown under sun and shade conditions[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 70(1): 20-28.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
HU Y L, WANG S L, ZENG D H, 2006. Effects of single Chinese Fir and mixed leaf litters on soil chemical, microbial properties and soil enzyme activities[J]. Plant and Soil, 282(1): 379-386.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
HUANG K, XIA J Y, 2019. High ecosystem stability of evergreen broadleaf forests under severe droughts[J]. Global Change Biology, 25(10): 3494-3503.
DOI PMID |
| [9] |
ITO S, SHINOHARA C, HIRATA R, et al., 2019. Factors limiting the distribution of deciduous broadleaved trees in warm-temperate mountainous riparian forests[J]. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 15(4): 391-400.
DOI |
| [10] |
KUNSTLER G, FALSTER D, COOMES D A, et al., 2016. Plant functional traits have globally consistent effects on competition[J]. Nature, 529(7585): 204-207.
DOI |
| [11] |
MYERS J A, CHASE J M, JIMÉNEZ I, et al., 2013. Beta-diversity in temperate and tropical forests reflects dissimilar mechanisms of community assembly[J]. Ecology Letters, 16(2): 151-157.
DOI PMID |
| [12] | PIANKA E R, 1973. The structure of lizard communities[J]. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 4(1): 53-74. |
| [13] |
POORTER L, BONGERS L, BONGERS F, 2006. Architecture of 54 moist-forest tree species: Traits, trade-offs, and functional groups[J]. Ecology, 87(5): 1289-1301.
DOI PMID |
| [14] |
SCHLUTER D, 1984. A variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications[J]. Ecology, 65(3): 998-1005.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
SEMCHENKO M, ABAKUMOVA M, LEPIK A, et al., 2013. Plants are least suppressed by their frequent neighbours: The relationship between competitive ability and spatial aggregation patterns[J]. Journal of Ecology, 101(5): 1313-1321.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
BREUGEL M V, BONGERS F, NORDEN N, et al., 2024. Feedback loops drive ecological succession: Towards a unified conceptual framework[J]. Biological Reviews, 99(3): 928-949.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
ZHAO X Y, ZHANG W Q, FENG Y J, et al., 2022. Soil organic carbon primarily control the soil moisture characteristic during forest restoration in subtropical China[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10: 1003532.
DOI URL |
| [18] | 刁忠煜, 祁建华, 黄健彬, 2025. 青岛近岸生物气溶胶中细菌存活率分布特征及其影响因素的随机森林回归分析[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 55(8): 116-127. |
| DIAO Z Y, QI J H, HUANG J B, 2025. Distribution characteristics and random forest regression analysis of influencing factors of bacterial viability in bioaerosols in the coastal region of Qingdao[J]. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 55(8): 116-127. | |
| [19] | 丁圣彦, 宋永昌, 2003. 演替研究在常绿阔叶林抚育和恢复上的应用[J]. 应用生态学报, 14(3): 423-426. |
| DING S Y, SONG Y C, 2003. Application of succession study in tending and restoration of evergreen broadleaved forest[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 14(3): 423-426. | |
| [20] | 丁圣彦, 宋永昌, 2004. 常绿阔叶林植被动态研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 24(8): 1769-1779. |
| DING S Y, SONG Y C, 2004. Research advances in vegetation dynamic of evergreen broad-leaved forest[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24(8): 1769-1779. | |
| [21] |
丁文慧, 李秀珍, 姜俊彦, 等, 2016. 崇明东滩南部河口盐沼植物群落种间关系的数量分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 27(5): 1417-1426.
DOI |
| DING W H, LI X Z, JIANG J Y, et al., 2016. Numerical analysis of inter-specific relationships in the estuary salt marsh plant community of southern Chongming Dongtan, Shanghai[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 27(5): 1417-1426. | |
| [22] | 段仁燕, 王孝安, 2004. 植物邻体干扰的研究范畴、热点及意义[J]. 西北植物学报, 24(6): 1138-1144. |
| DUAN R Y, WANG X A, 2004. Contents, heated problems and significance of neighborhood interference among plants[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 24(6): 1138-1144. | |
| [23] | 关晓蔷, 王文剑, 庞继芳, 等, 2021. 基于空间变换的随机森林算法[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 58(11): 2485-2499. |
| GUAN X Q, WANG W J, PANG J F, et al., 2021. Space transformation based random forest algorithm[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 58(11): 2485-2499. | |
| [24] | 管杰然, 商天其, 伊力塔, 等, 2017. 天目山常绿落叶阔叶混交林优势种生物量变化及群落演替特征[J]. 生态学报, 37(20): 6761-6772. |
| GUAN J R, SHANG T Q, YI L T, et al., 2017. Biomass change and community succession characteristics of dominant species in evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved mixed forests in Tianmu Mountain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(20): 6761-6772. | |
| [25] | 管铭, 金则新, 李月灵, 等, 2015. 千岛湖次生林优势种植物光合生理生态特性[J]. 生态学报, 35(7): 2057-2066. |
| GUAN M, JIN Z X, LI Y L, et al., 2015. Photo-ecological characteristics of the dominant plant species in the secondary forest surrounding Qiandao Lake, Zhejiang, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(7): 2057-2066. | |
| [26] |
桂旭君, 练琚愉, 张入匀, 等, 2019. 鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林群落垂直结构及其物种多样性特征[J]. 生物多样性, 27(6): 619-629.
DOI |
|
GUI X J, LIAN J Y, ZHANG R Y, et al., 2019. Vertical structure and its biodiversity in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest at Dinghushan in Guangdong Province, China[J]. Biodiversity Science, 27(6): 619-629.
DOI URL |
|
| [27] | 郭建辉, 2020. 浙江省针阔混交林非空间结构动态演变过程特征研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学. |
| GUO J H, 2020. Dynamic evolution of non-spatial structure of coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest in Zhejiang Province[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang A & F University. | |
| [28] | 黄浩, 吴文骁, 吕江波, 等, 2025. 浙江建德楠木林优势树种生态位及种间联结性[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 42(2): 329-338. |
| HUANG H, WU W X, LÜ J B, et al., 2025. Ecological niche and interspecific association of dominant tree species in a Machilus and Phoebe forest in Jiande, Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 42(2): 329-338. | |
| [29] | 黄兆旺, 叶丽敏, 周肄智, 等, 2025. 浙西南针阔混交林碳、水通量季节动态及其对环境响应[J/OL]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), [2025-11-10]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/10.1449.S.20250603.1301.008. |
| HUANG Z W, YE L M, ZHOU Y Z, et al., 2025. Seasonal dynamics of carbon and water vapor fluxes and their environmental responses in mixed coniferous-broadleaf forests of southwestern Zhejiang, China[J/OL]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, [2025-11-10]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/10.1449.S.20250603.1301.008. | |
| [30] | 李根有, 丁炳扬, 2021. 浙江植物志(新编)[M]. 杭州: 浙江科学技术出版社. |
| LI G Y, DING B Y, 2021. Flora of Zhejiang (New Edition)[M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Science and Technology Publishing House. | |
| [31] | 李坚锋, 潘萍, 欧阳勋志, 等, 2022. 庐山常绿阔叶林种间联结性及物种共存机制[J]. 生态学杂志, 41(8): 1474-1481. |
|
LI J F, PAN P, OUYANG X Z, et al., 2022. Interspecific association and species coexistence mechanism of evergreen broad-leaved forest in Lushan Mountain[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 41(8): 1474-1481.
DOI |
|
| [32] |
李珂佳, 蔡晨, 阮广鸣, 等, 2025. 小叶红豆群落主要树种的种间关系及群落稳定性[J]. 应用生态学报, 36(2): 427-436.
DOI |
| LI K J, CAI C, RUAN G M, et al., 2025. Interspecific association of main tree species in Ormosia microphylla community and its community stability[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 36(2): 427-436. | |
| [33] | 李琨, 胡兆贵, 张茂付, 等, 2025. 巾子峰国家森林公园常绿阔叶林木本植物优势种的生态位和种间联结性[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 42(1): 45-54. |
| LI K, HU Z G, ZHANG M F, et al., 2025. Niche and interspecific connectivity of dominant species of woody plants in evergreen broad-leaved forest of Jinzifeng National Forest Park[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 42(1): 45-54. | |
| [34] | 李奇鸽, 俞叶飞, 陈伟杰, 等, 2025. 浙江大盘山云锦杜鹃群落结构和优势种群动态研究[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 42(1): 1-11. |
| LI Q G, YU Y F, CHEN W J, et al., 2025. Community structure and dominant population dynamics of Rhododendron fortunei in Mount Dapanshan, Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 42(1): 1-11. | |
| [35] | 李瑞芬, 宋丁全, 2012. 查湾自然保护区枫香种群生命表与生存分析[J]. 金陵科技学院学报, 28(4): 66-70. |
| LI R F, SONG D Q, 2012. Life table and survival analysis of Liquidambar Formosana population in Zhawan Nature Reserve[J]. Journal of Jinling Institute of Technology, 28(4): 66-70. | |
| [36] | 李玉玲, 梁素, 周丽珠, 等, 2024. 基于功能性状的中亚热带岩溶常绿落叶阔叶混交林物种多样性维持研究[J]. 生态学报, 44(10): 4400-4411. |
| LI Y L, LIANG S, ZHOU L Z, et al., 2024. Maintenance of species diversity in evergreen deciduous broad-leaved mixed forest of karst hills in central subtropical region based on functional traits[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44(10): 4400-4411. | |
| [37] | 林思祖, 黄世国, 洪伟, 2004. 杉阔混交林杉木与其混交树种种间竞争研究[J]. 林业科学, 40(2): 160-164. |
| LIN S Z, HUANG S G, HONG W, 2004. The study on the interspecific competition between Chinese Fir and its main mixed species in Chinese Fir and broad-leaf mixed forest[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 40(2): 160-164. | |
| [38] | 刘微, 2014. 天童主要落叶和常绿树种叶片N、P化学计量学及分配特征研究[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学. |
| LIU W, 2014. Leaf N, P stoichiometry and allocation of main deciduous and evergreen tree species in Tiantong National Forest Park, Zhejiang Province, China[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University. | |
| [39] | 卢炜丽, 张洪江, 陈奇伯, 等, 2016. 重庆四面山杉木林群落乔木层优势种群生态位特征研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 31(2): 60-65. |
| LU W L, ZHANG H J, CHEN Q B, et al., 2016. Niche characteristics of the tree-layer dominant populations of Cunninghamia lanceolata forest in Chongqing Simian Mountains[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 31(2): 60-65. | |
| [40] | 马克平, 刘玉明, 1994. 生物群落多样性的测度方法 Ⅰ. α多样性的测度方法(下)[J]. 生物多样性, 2(4): 231-239. |
|
MA K P, LIU Y M, 1994. Measuring methods of biological community diversity: Ⅰ. α diversity measurement method (Part2)[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2(4): 231-239.
DOI URL |
|
| [41] | 莫金凤, 曾睿楷, 周庆, 等, 2024. 广东鹅凰嶂省级自然保护区圆籽荷所在群落乔木层优势种的生态位及种间联结性[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 33(6): 74-82. |
| MO J F, CENG R K, ZHOU Q, et al., 2024. Niche and interspecific associations of dominant species in arbor layer of the community including Apterosperma oblata in Ehuangzhang Provincial Nature Reserve of Guangdong Province[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 33(6): 74-82. | |
| [42] | 商侃侃, 王婕, 余倩, 等, 2011. 天目山第三纪孑遗植物缺萼枫香的群落特征及其生态学意义[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 157(3): 134-144. |
| SHANG K K, WANG J, YU Q, et al., 2011. Tertiary relict plant Liquidambar acalycina Chang on Mt. Tianmuin Eastern China: Characteristics of the community and the ecological significance[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science), 157(3): 134-144. | |
| [43] | 沈琪, 张骏, 朱锦茹, 等, 2005. 浙江省生态公益林植被恢复过程中物种组成及多样性的变化[J]. 生态学报, 25(9): 2131-2138. |
| SHEN Q, ZHANG J, ZHU J R, et al., 2005. Changes of species composition and diversity in the restoration processes of ecological public-welfare forests in Zhejiang, East China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 25(9): 2131-2138. | |
| [44] | 沈泽昊, 金义兴, 赵子恩, 等, 2000. 亚热带山地森林珍稀植物群落的结构与动态[J]. 生态学报, 20(5): 800-807. |
| SHEN Z H, JIN Y X, ZHAO Z E, et al., 2000. The structure and dynamics of the rare plant communities in subtropical mountain of China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 20(5): 800-807. | |
| [45] | 苏文浩, 王晓楠, 董灵波, 2024. 大兴安岭不同演替阶段天然林物种多度格局模拟[J]. 生态学报, 44(10): 4412-4422. |
| SU W H, WANG X N, DONG L B, et al., 2024. Simulation of species abundance patterns in different successional stages of natural forests in Great Khingan Mountain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44(10): 4412-4422. | |
| [46] |
唐青青, 黄永涛, 丁易, 等, 2016. 亚热带常绿落叶阔叶混交林植物功能性状的种间和种内变异[J]. 生物多样性, 24(3): 262-270.
DOI |
|
TANG Q Q, HUANG Y T, DING Y, et al., 2016. Interspecific and intraspecific variation in functional traits of subtropical evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved mixed forests[J]. Biodiversity Science, 24(3): 262-270.
DOI |
|
| [47] | 王刚, 赵松岭, 张鹏云, 等, 1984. 关于生态位定义的探讨及生态位重叠计测公式改进的研究[J]. 生态学报, 4(2): 119-127. |
| WANG G, ZHAO S L, ZHANG P Y, et al., 1984. Discussion on the definition of niche and study on the improvement of the measurement formula of niche overlap[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 4(2): 119-127. | |
| [48] |
王进, 朱江, 艾训儒, 等, 2019. 湖北星斗山地形变化对不同生活型植物叶功能性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 43(5): 447-457.
DOI |
|
WANG J, ZHU J, AI X R, et al., 2019. Effects of topography on leaf functional traits across plant life forms in Xingdou Mountain, Hubei, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 43(5): 447-457.
DOI |
|
| [49] |
王如, 彭文成, 杨佳, 等, 2024. 尖峰岭杉木人工林群落主要木本植物的生态位和种间联结[J]. 应用生态学报, 35(6): 1483-1491.
DOI |
|
WANG R, PENG W C, YANG J, et al., 2024. Niche and interspecific association of main woody plants in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation community in Jianfengling, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 35(6): 1483-1491.
DOI |
|
| [50] | 王晓峰, 汪思龙, 张伟东, 2013. 杉木凋落物对土壤有机碳分解及微生物生物量碳的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 24(9): 2393-2398. |
| WANG X F, WANG S L, ZHANG W D, 2013. Effects of Chinese Fir litter on soil organic carbon decomposition and microbial biomass carbon[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(9): 2393-2398. | |
| [51] | 王胤晨, 袁扬, 任昌仕, 等, 2025. 基于机器学习的贵州省中华蜜蜂工蜂形态分化分析[J]. 昆虫学报, 68(8): 1164-1174. |
| aWANG Y C, YUAN Y, REN C S, et al., 2025. Analysis of the morphological differentiation of Apis cerana cerana (Hymenoptera: Apidae) workers in Guizhou Province based on machine learning[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 68(8): 1164-1174. | |
| [52] |
魏强, 凌雷, 张广忠, 等, 2015. 兴隆山森林群落不同演替阶段优势乔木种群结构特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 39(5): 59-66.
DOI |
| WEI Q, LING L, ZHANG G Z, et al., 2015. Structure characteristics of dominant tree species population in different succession stages of forest community in Xinglong Mountain[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 39(5): 59-66. | |
| [53] | 吴卫华, 吴家森, 吴文骁, 等, 2024. 珍稀植物浙江安息香群落种间生态位及种间联结[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 52(12): 46-54. |
| WU W H, WU J S, WU W X, et al., 2024. The interspecific niche and interspecific association of the rare plant Styrax zhejiangensis Community[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 52(12): 46-54. | |
| [54] | 吴友贵, 叶珍林, 周荣飞, 等, 2016. 百山祖常绿阔叶林优势种群的生态位[J]. 广西植物, 36(2): 186-192. |
| WU Y G, YE Z L, ZHOU R F, et al., 2016. Niche of dominant species populations in an evergreen broad-leaved forest in Baishanzu[J]. Guihaia, 36(2): 186-192. | |
| [55] | 辛营营, 韦新良, 2011. 青山湖针阔混交林优势树种竞争的数量研究[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 28(4): 601-606. |
| XIN Y Y, WEI X L, 2011. Dominance in a mixed conifer and broadleaved forest of Qingshan Lake, Zhejiang[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 28(4): 601-606. | |
| [56] | 胥清利, 2007. 枫香与杉木、马尾松混交林土壤有机质和腐殖质碳的研究[J]. 福建林业科技, 34(4): 42-45. |
| XU Q L, 2007. A study on soil organic and humic carbon in mixed plantations of Liquidambar formosana and Cunninghamia lanceolata, L. formosana and Pinus massoniana[J]. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, 34(4): 42-45. | |
| [57] | 徐满厚, 刘敏, 翟大彤, 等, 2016. 植物种间联结研究内容与方法评述[J]. 生态学报, 36(24): 8224-8233. |
| XU M H, LIU M, ZHAI D T, et al., 2016. A review of contents and methods used to analyze various aspects of plant interspecific associations[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(24): 8224-8233. | |
| [58] |
袁金凤, 胡仁勇, 慎佳泓, 等, 2011. 4种不同演替阶段森林群落物种组成和多样性的比较研究[J]. 植物研究, 31(1): 61-66.
DOI |
| YUAN J F, HU R Y, SHEN J H, et al., 2011. Comparison of species composition and diversity of four successional forest communities in Zhejiang Province, East China[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 31(1): 61-66. | |
| [59] | 张跃西, 钟章成, 1999. 木本植物邻体干扰研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 18(2): 56-60. |
| ZHANG Y X, ZHONG Z C, 1999. Advances of neighborhood interference among woody plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 18(2): 56-60. | |
| [60] | 张桂珍, 杨焕强, 朱耀福, 等, 2022. 建德地区短时强降水时空分布特征分析[J]. 现代农业科技 (3): 186-190. |
| ZHANG G Z, YANG H Q, ZHU Y F, et al., 2022. Analysis on temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of short-term heavy rainfall in Jiande area[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology (3): 186-190. | |
| [61] | 郑永敏, 吕江波, 吴文骁, 等, 2024. 新安江森林公园阔叶林木本植物生态位与种间联结性[J]. 森林与环境学报, 44(6): 619-627. |
| ZHENG Y M, LÜ J B, WU W X, et al., 2024. Study on ecological niche and interspecific associations in the evergreen broad-leaved forests of Xin’anjiang Forest Park[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 44(6): 619-627. | |
| [62] | 周忠诚, 贺勇, 侯梅, 等, 2016. 鄂东北枫香林更新演替研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 55(19): 4932-4936. |
| ZHOU Z C, HE Y, HOU M, et al., 2016. Research on regeneration and succession of sweetgum (Liquidambar formosana) forest in Northeast Hubei Province[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 55(19): 4932-4936. | |
| [63] |
邹朋峻, 关庆伟, 袁在翔, 等, 2023. 紫金山南麓枫香种群结构与动态特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 47(3): 157-163.
DOI |
| ZOU P J, GUAN Q W, YUAN Z X, et al., 2023. The population structure and dynamics of Liquidambar formosana on the southeast foothill of Zijin Mountain, Nanjing City[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 47(3): 157-163. |
| [1] | 吴锡言, 李维军, 卡那特, 彭玉杰. 基于随机森林和OCO-2遥感数据分析2023年中国连续时空xCO2变化特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(9): 1341-1350. |
| [2] | 张晟博, 吴作航, 党皓飞, 廖廓, 陆灯盛, 李登秋. 近20年武夷山地区不同遥感指标对极端气候事件的响应及差异[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(8): 1240-1254. |
| [3] | 祁珣, 冯鑫鑫, 陈颖军, 冯艳丽, 陈田, 李军, 张干. 轻型汽油卡车尾气颗粒物中氨和有机胺的排放特征及影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(7): 997-1006. |
| [4] | 刘泽渊, 魏有海, 严旭发, 程亮, 侯璐, 严紫玮, 郭良芝. 气候变化对入侵杂草续断菊潜在地理分布的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(6): 845-852. |
| [5] | 张丹丹, 毋振海, 吴渴, 毕方, 李云凤, 安聪, 韩翼昕, 刘正阳, 朱玲, 王学中. 基于不同类型臭氧污染日的臭氧污染特征及影响因素分析:以亳州市为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(5): 720-730. |
| [6] | 刘嘉怡, 张军, 张帆, 张慧, 王梓晗, 刘菊红, 吕世杰. 围封对短花针茅荒漠草原优势种群种间联结性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(2): 247-255. |
| [7] | 阿旺罗布, 王俊伟, 曾哲飞, 李伟, 闹增措, 谭鑫, 拉琼. 西藏雅尼湿地洲滩植物群落优势种生态位及种间联结性[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(10): 1558-1568. |
| [8] | 王恭斌, 花利忠, 卢璇, 李琳, 章欣欣, 李兰晖. 基于遥感与机器学习的中国城市夏季热岛气候带分异特征(2003-2022年)及其驱动因子分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(10): 1609-1617. |
| [9] | 赵婧姝, 刘杰, 蒋旭升, 黄展桂, 杨霖. 镉-铅-锌复合污染土壤中青葙根际微生物群落的演替过程[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(10): 1644-1653. |
| [10] | 卢德浩, 郑峰霖, 古佳玮, 帅晓迈, 杨佳曼, 李程, 蔡梦真, 陈红跃. 不同林分类型凋落物和土壤水源涵养能力分析与评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(1): 26-35. |
| [11] | 李建付, 黄志霖, 和成忠, 姜昕, 宋琳, 刘佳鑫, 陈利顶. 滇东喀斯特断陷盆地土壤有机碳空间分布特征及其关键影响因子[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(9): 1339-1352. |
| [12] | 杜忠毓, 邢文黎, 党宁, 赵维彬, 谭许脉, 肖江, 盖旭, 陈光才. 甘肃西和锑矿生态破坏区优势物种生态位及种间联结性[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(7): 1036-1047. |
| [13] | 周玉祥, 赵玉, 聂仁东, 丁丁, 郭立华, 周佳峥. 下辽河平原土地沙漠化程度及预测研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(6): 1133-1139. |
| [14] | 张林, 齐实, 周飘, 伍冰晨, 张岱, 张岩. 北京山区针阔混交林地土壤有机碳含量的影响因素研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(3): 450-458. |
| [15] | 王成武, 罗俊杰, 唐鸿湖. 基于InVEST模型的太行山沿线地区生态系统碳储量时空分异驱动力分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(2): 215-225. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||