扎兰屯地区典型天然林群落特征及其相关性分析

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.07.003

生态环境学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 1353-1359.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.07.003

所属专题：生物多样性专题汇编

扎兰屯地区典型天然林群落特征及其相关性分析

赵丽¹^,²(), 郭春燕³, 张文军¹, 王晓江¹, 刘平生¹^,²^,^*()

1.内蒙古自治区林业科学研究院,内蒙古呼和浩特 010010
2.沙地生物资源保护与培育国家林业局重点实验室,内蒙古呼和浩特 010010
3.内蒙古自治区气象服务中心,内蒙古呼和浩特 010051

收稿日期:2021-03-23 出版日期:2021-07-18 发布日期:2021-10-09
通讯作者: *刘平生（1961年生）,男,研究员,研究方向为林木引种繁育与生态学。E-mail: nmlkylps@163.com
作者简介:赵丽（1982年生）,女,副研究员,研究方向为林木引种繁育与生态学。E-mail: 591518088@qq.com
基金资助:
内蒙古退耕还林工程生态效益监测项目;十三五国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0500904)

Community Characteristics and Their Correlation Analysis of Typical Natural Forest in Zhalantun

ZHAO Li¹^,²(), GUO Chunyan³, ZHANG Wenjun¹, WANG Xiaojiang¹, LIU Pingsheng¹^,²^,^*()

1. Inner Mongolia Academy of Forestry, Hohhot 010010, China
2. Key laboratory of conservation and cultivation in desert biological resources, State forestry bureau, Hohhot 010010, China
3. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Meteorological Service Center, Inner Mongolia, Hohhot 010051, China

Received:2021-03-23 Online:2021-07-18 Published:2021-10-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了解天然林的群落特征及其相关性,提升天然林的管理及生态防护功能,以大兴安岭扎兰屯天然落叶松（Larix gmelinii）纯林、白桦（Betula platyphylla）次生林、白桦-落叶松混交林为研究对象,分别对乔木层、灌木层和草本层的高度、胸径、冠幅、盖度等指标进行调查,分析群落结构特征,计算物种丰富度指数、多样性指数和均匀度指数,并进行主成分分析（PCA）。结果显示,（1）3个群落中落叶松林的乔木层树高、胸径和灌木层的地径、盖度均最高,草本层特征差异不显著（P>0.05）。（2）落叶松林、白桦-落叶松林中平榛（Corylus heterophylla）和土庄绣线菊（Spiraea pubescens）的重要值均明显高于其他灌木树种;白桦林灌木层只有兴安柳（Salix hsinganica）;3种林分草本层均以兴安苔草（Carex chinganensis）为优势种。（3）乔木层、灌木层的丰富度指数、Simpson指数和Shannon-Wiener指数均表现出：白桦-落叶松林>落叶松林>白桦次生林;草本层以落叶松林最为丰富,其Simpson指数、Shannon-Wiener指数均以白桦林为最大;乔木层、灌木层、草本层的Pielou指数均以白桦-落叶松林为最大。（4）PCA排序结果显示,随着林分郁闭度、乔木树高、胸径及灌木盖度、高度、基径的增大,灌木层植物的多样性指数和均匀度增加明显,草本层多样性降低;草本高度越高、盖度越大,草本层多样性指数、均匀度越高。研究表明：乔木层郁闭度、灌木层生长特征（盖度、高度和基径）是影响物种多样性的主因,林分群落特征与植物多样性存在相关性。

关键词: 天然林, 群落结构特征, 植物多样性, 耦合关系, PCA分析

Abstract:

The purpose of this paper is to improve management and ecological services of natural forests by exploring the community characteristics and their correlation relationship. In this study, the diameter breast height (DBH), diameter ground height (DGH), canopy diameter (CD), fraction cover (FC) of trees, shrub and herb were investigated for three typical communities i.e. pure larch forest (Larix gmelinii), birch secondary forest (Betula platyphylla), mixed larch-birch forest, located in Zhalantun in Daxinganling Mountains. The community characteristics including richness index, diversity index and evenness index were calculated and analyzed by PCA method. The results showed that (1) height and DBH of tree, DBG and FC of shrub layer in pure larch forest were largest. The herb characteristics of among three natural forests were not significantly different (P>0.05). (2) Corylus heterophylla and Spiraea pubescens were more important than the other shrub species in pure larch forest and mixed larch-birch forest. There was only one shrub species i.e. Salix hsinganica in birch secondary forest. Carex chinganensis was the dominant species among three natural forest. (3) The richness index, Simpson index and Shannon-Wiener index of tree and shrub were: mixed larch-birch forest>larch forest>birch secondary forest. The richness index of herb was largest for larch forest, while Simpson index and Shannon-Wiener index of herb were largest for birch secondary forest. Meantime, the Pielou index of tree, shrub and herb was the largest for mixed larch-birch forest. (4) PCA result showed that the diversity index and evenness of shrub increased and the herb diversity decreased when the canopy closure, height, DBH of trees and FC, height and DGH of shrub increased. We conclude that tree canopy density and shrub coverage, height and DGH are the main affecting factors of plant diversity. There is the correlation relationship between community characteristics and plant diversity.

Key words: natural forest, community characteristics, plant diversity, coupling relationship, principal component analysis

中图分类号:

赵丽, 郭春燕, 张文军, 王晓江, 刘平生. 扎兰屯地区典型天然林群落特征及其相关性分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(7): 1353-1359.

ZHAO Li, GUO Chunyan, ZHANG Wenjun, WANG Xiaojiang, LIU Pingsheng. Community Characteristics and Their Correlation Analysis of Typical Natural Forest in Zhalantun[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(7): 1353-1359.

图/表 5

参考文献 28

[1]	CADOTTE M W, CARSCADDEN K, MIROTCHNICK N, 2011. Beyond species functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(5): 1079-1087. DOI URL
[2]	LEVINE J M, HILLERISLAMBERS J, 2009. The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity[J]. Nature, 461(7261): 254-257. DOI URL
[3]	LI L, HUAR IG Z L, YE W H, et al., 2009. Spatial distributions of tree species in a subtropical forest of china[J]. Oikos, 118(4): 495-502. DOI URL
[4]	TRENTINI C P, CAMPANELLO P I, VILLAGRA M, et al., 2017. Thinning of loblolly pine plantations in subtropical Argentina: Impact on microclimate and understory vegetation[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 384: 236-247. DOI URL
[5]	WANG Q G, BAO D C, GUO Y L, et al., 2014. Species associations in a species-rich subtropical forest were not well-explained by stochastic geometry of biodiversity[J]. PLoS One, 9(5): e97300. DOI URL
[6]	崔佳佳, 铁牛, 2021. 大兴安岭北部森林群落结构及植物多样性特征研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 36(2): 24-30.
	CUI J J, TIE N, 2021. Forest community structureand plant diversity characteristics in Northern Greater Khingan Mountains[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 36(2): 24-30.
[7]	杜志, 亢新刚, 孟京辉, 等, 2013. 长白山杨桦次生林主要树种的空间分布格局及其关联性[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 41(4): 36-42.
	DU Z, KANG X G, M J H, et al., 2013. Spatial distribution patterns and associations of dominant tree species in poplar-birch secondary forest stand in Changbai Mountains[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 41(4): 36-42.
[8]	桂旭君, 练琚愉, 张入匀, 等, 2019. 鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林群落垂直结构及其物种多样性特征[J]. 生物多样性, 27(6): 619-629. DOI
	GUI X J, LIAN J Y, ZHANG R Y, et al., 2019. Vertical structure and its biodiversity in a subtropical evergreen broad leaved forest at Dinghushan in Guangdong Province, China[J]. Biodiversity Science, 27(6): 619-629. DOI URL
[9]	蒋蕾, 刘兆刚, 2014. 大兴安岭天然白桦林群落结构特征及其物种多样性[J]. 森林工程, 30(4): 12-17.
	JIANG L, LIU Z G, 2014. Structure characteristics of natural birch community and species diversity in Great Xing’an mountains[J]. Forest Engineering, 30(4): 12-17.
[10]	雷相东, 2000. 东北过伐林区几种典型森林类型的物种和林分结构多样性及采伐的影响研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学.
	LEI X D, 2000. Studies on plant species diversity and stand structural diversity of typical forest types and cutting effects on them in over-logged forests in Northeastern China[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University.
[11]	李冰, 2009. 大兴安岭兴安落叶松林健康评价研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学.
	LI B, 2009. Research on forest health evaluation of Larix gmelin in the great Xing’an Mountains[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University.
[12]	黎芳, 潘萍, 宁金魁, 等, 2016. 飞播马尾松林林分空间结构对林下植被多样性的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 44(1): 31-35, 40.
	LI F, PAN P, NING J K, et al., 2016. Effects of stand spatial structure on understory vegetation diversity of aerial seeding Pinus massoniana plantations[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 44(11): 31-35, 40.
[13]	连灵燕, 张海珠, 2012. 白桦天然次生林种群种间关联及演替规律的研究[J]. 山西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 26(4): 62-65.
	LIAN L Y, ZHANG H Z, 2012. Study on interspecific association and community succession of Betula platypylla natural secondary forest[J]. Shanxi Normal University (Science), 26(4): 62-65.
[14]	刘林馨, 2012. 小兴安岭森林生态系统植物多样性及生态服务功能价值研究[D]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学.
	LIU L X, 2012. Study on the palnt biodiversity and ecosystem service functions evaluation of forest ecosystem in Xiaoxing’an mountains[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forest University.
[15]	刘召强, 刘艺平, 冯理明, 等, 2020. 额尔齐斯河流域垂枝桦林群落结构特征与物种多样性相关分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 40(3): 532-542.
	LIU Z Q, LIU Y P, FENG L M, et al., 2020. Differences in community characteristics, species diversity, and their coupling associations among Betula pendula forests in Irtysh river watershed[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 40(3): 532-542.
[16]	马文静, 张庆, 牛建明, 等, 2013. 物种多样性和功能群多样性与生态系统生产力的关系——以内蒙古短花针茅草原为例[J]. 植物生态学报, 37(7): 620-630. DOI
	MA W J, ZHANG Q, NIU J M, et al., 2013. Relationship of ecosystem primary productivity to species diversity and functional group diversity: Evidence from Stipa breviflora grassland in Nei Mongol[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 37(7): 620-630. DOI URL
[17]	曲红, 王百田, 王棣, 等, 2010. 黄土区不同配置人工林物种多样性研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 19(4): 843-848.
	QU H, WANG B T, WANG D, et al., 2010. Research of artificial forest plant diversity under different configuration of loess area[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 19(4): 843-848.
[18]	矢佳昱, 韩海荣, 程小琴, 等, 2018. 辽河源自然保护区不同年龄天然油松林林下草本层植物物种多样性及其环境解释[J]. 生态学杂志, 37(5): 1326-1333.
	SHI J Y, HAN H R, CHENG X Q, et al., 2018. Environmental factors affecting plant species diversity of understory herbaceous communities in a chronosequence of Pinus tabuliformis forest in Liaoheyuan Nature Reserve[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 37(5): 1326-1333.
[19]	覃志杰, 董威, 刘泰瑞, 等, 2019. 油松天然次生林林下植物多样性对林分密度的响应研究[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 39(1): 61-67.
	TAN Z J, DONG W, LIU T R, et al., 2019. Responses of understory plant diversity to stand density in natural secondary forests of Pinus tabulaeformis [J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 39(1): 61-67.
[20]	王玲, 2020. 林分密度对油松人工林群落结构和植物多样性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 29(12): 2328-2336.
	WANG L, 2020. Effects of different stand densities on community structure and species diversity of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 29(12): 2328-2336.
[21]	邢晖, 2014. 大兴安岭落叶松白桦混交林林分空间结构优化技术研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学.
	XING H, 2014. Study on the forest stand spatial structure optimization technology for Larch-Betula platyphylla mixed forest stand in Daxing’an mountains[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forest University.
[22]	赵淑清, 方精云, 朴世龙, 等, 2004. 大兴安岭呼中地区白卡鲁山植物群落结构及其多样性研究[J]. 生物多样性, 12(1): 182-189.
	ZHAO S Q, FANG J Y, PIAO S L, et al., 2004. Structure and species diversity of boreal forests in Mt. Baikalu, Huzhong area, Daxing’an Mountains, Northeast China[J]. Biodiversity Science, 12(1): 182-189.
[23]	张建宇, 2018. 大兴安岭森林植物多样性、群落结构特征及耦合性关系分析[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学.
	ZHANG J Y, 2018. Characteristics of plant diversity and community structure in Daxing’anling forests and association analysis[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forest University.
[24]	张佳, 李生宇, 靳正忠, 等, 2011. 防护林下草本植物层片物种多样性与环境因子的关系[J]. 干旱区研究, 28(1): 118-125.
	ZHANG J, LI S Y, JIN Z Z, et al., 2011. Relationship between species diversity of herbaceous plants in the shelterbelt and environment factors[J]. Arid Zone Research, 28(1): 118-125. DOI URL
[25]	张建宇, 王文杰, 杜红居, 等, 2018. 大兴安岭呼中地区3种林分的群落特征、物种多样性差异及其耦合关系[J]. 生态学报, 38(13): 4684-4693.
	ZHANG J Y, WANG W J, DUAN H J, et al., 2018. Differences in community characteristics,species diversity and their coupling associations among three forest types in the Huzhongarea Daxinganling Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(13): 4684-4693.
[26]	张维伟, 薛文艳, 杨斌, 等, 2019. 桥山栎林群落结构特征与物种多样性相关关系分析[J]. 生态学报, 39(11): 3991-4001.
	ZHANG W W, XUE W Y, YANG B, et al., 2019. Differences incommunity characteristics,species diversity, and their coupling associations among three Quercus acutissima forests in Qiaoshan[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(11): 3991-4001.
[27]	周晓果, 温远光, 朱宏光, 等, 2017. 大明山常绿阔叶林冠层垂直结构与林下植物更新[J]. 应用生态学报, 28(2): 367-374.
	ZHOU X G, WEN Y G, ZHU H G, et al., 2017. Canopy vertical structure and understory plant regeneration of an evergreen broadleaved forest in Damingshan, Guangxi, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 28(2): 367-374.
[28]	张柳桦, 齐锦秋, 李婷婷, 等, 2019. 林分密度对新津文峰山马尾松人工林林下物种多样性和生物量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 39(15): 5709-5717.
	ZHANG L H, QI J Q, LI T T, et al., 2019. Effects of stand density on understory plant diversity and biomass in a Pinus massoniana plantation in Wenfeng Mountain, Xinjin County[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(15): 5709-5717.

层 Layer	特征参数 Characteristic parameter	落叶松林 Larch forest	白桦-落叶松林 Birch-larch forest	白桦林 Birch forest
乔木层 Arbor	树高Tree height/m	13.87±1.22a	10.78±0.47b	6.97±0.20c
	胸径 Tree diameter breast height/cm	18.73±4.63a	13.86±0.45a	7.24±0.37b
	郁闭度 Tree canopy closure/%	97.51±4.30a	87.78±17.80a	56.92±2.92b
灌木层 Shrub	株高 Shrub height/m	0.66±0.09a	0.7±0.04a	0.46±0.06b
	地径 Shrub ground diameter/cm	0.67±0.1a	0.61±0.13a	0.38±0.16a
	盖度 Shrub coverage/%	55.78±31.31a	39.25±9.5ab	10.33±4.33b
	冠幅 Shrub crown width/cm	31.19±11.74a	28.92±7.96a	20.00±10.33a
草本层 Herb	多度 Herb coverage/plant	12.24±5.92a	8.44±2.04a	7.00±1.20a
	高度 Herb height/cm	22.55±7.69a	14.50±1.71a	29.52±16.77a
	盖度 Herb coverage/%	60.65±26.55a	38.52±2.86a	56.32±2.63a

层 Layer	特征参数 Characteristic parameter	落叶松林 Larch forest	白桦-落叶松林 Birch-larch forest	白桦林 Birch forest
乔木层 Arbor	树高Tree height/m	13.87±1.22a	10.78±0.47b	6.97±0.20c
	胸径 Tree diameter breast height/cm	18.73±4.63a	13.86±0.45a	7.24±0.37b
	郁闭度 Tree canopy closure/%	97.51±4.30a	87.78±17.80a	56.92±2.92b
灌木层 Shrub	株高 Shrub height/m	0.66±0.09a	0.7±0.04a	0.46±0.06b
	地径 Shrub ground diameter/cm	0.67±0.1a	0.61±0.13a	0.38±0.16a
	盖度 Shrub coverage/%	55.78±31.31a	39.25±9.5ab	10.33±4.33b
	冠幅 Shrub crown width/cm	31.19±11.74a	28.92±7.96a	20.00±10.33a
草本层 Herb	多度 Herb coverage/plant	12.24±5.92a	8.44±2.04a	7.00±1.20a
	高度 Herb height/cm	22.55±7.69a	14.50±1.71a	29.52±16.77a
	盖度 Herb coverage/%	60.65±26.55a	38.52±2.86a	56.32±2.63a

层 layer	植物种 Plant species	重要值 Importance value/%
层 layer	植物种 Plant species	落叶松林 Larch forest	白桦-落叶松林 Birch-larch forest	白桦林 Birch forest
乔木层Tree	落叶松 Larix gmelinii	70.40	44.74	11.69
	山杨 Populus davidiana	9.71	2.95	5.83
	白桦 Betula platyphylla	9.87	22.53	76.62
	柞木 Xylosma racemosum	5.24	17.35	‒
	黑桦 Betula dahurica	4.78	12.43	5.86
灌木层Shrub	土庄绣线菊 Spiraea pubescens	28.72	35.32	‒
	平榛 Corylus heterophylla	56.66	53.24	‒
	小叶鼠李 Rhamnus parvifolia	‒	1.95	‒
	胡枝子 Lespedeza bicolor	14.62	6.98	‒
	山刺梅 Rosa davurica	‒	2.51	‒
	兴安柳 Salix hsinganica	‒	‒	100.00
草本层Herb	地榆 Sanguisorba officinalis	5.44	7.46	6.58
	东方草莓 Fragaria orientalis	16.56	10.82	‒
	兴安苔草 Carex chinganensis	29.61	38.37	36.45
	蒙古蒿 Mongolian wormwood	2.22	‒	‒
	唐松草Thalictrum petaloideum	4.25	4.67	1.10
	鼠掌老鹳草 Geranium sibiricum	3.31	5.07	15.41
	野火球 Trifolium lupinaster	2.66	2.95	0.91
	白莲蒿 Artemisia sacrorum	4.79	4.95	7.97
	龙牙草 Agrimonia pilosa	1.14	‒	2.53
	黑沙蒿 Artemisia ordosica	1.17	1.56	‒
	细叶鸢尾 Iris tenuifolia	4.79	3.12	3.26
	小红菊 Dendranthema chanetii	7.71	4.27	‒
	茜草 Rubia cordifolia	1.31	1.06	4.43
	费菜 Sedum aizoon	3.59	1.21	‒
	冰草 Agropyron cristatum	5.08	3.69	‒
	东北酸模 Rumex thyrsiflorus	0.84	‒	3.73
	狗尾草 Setaria viridis	‒	0.86	5.37
	铃兰 Convallaria majalis	‒	1.05	‒
	楔叶菊 Dendranthema naktongense	‒	1.19	‒
	柴胡 Bupleurum chinense	‒	1.17	‒
	益母草 Leonurus artemisia	‒	1.05	‒
	橐吾 Ligularia spp.	‒	‒	4.17

层 layer	植物种 Plant species	重要值 Importance value/%
层 layer	植物种 Plant species	落叶松林 Larch forest	白桦-落叶松林 Birch-larch forest	白桦林 Birch forest
乔木层Tree	落叶松 Larix gmelinii	70.40	44.74	11.69
	山杨 Populus davidiana	9.71	2.95	5.83
	白桦 Betula platyphylla	9.87	22.53	76.62
	柞木 Xylosma racemosum	5.24	17.35	‒
	黑桦 Betula dahurica	4.78	12.43	5.86
灌木层Shrub	土庄绣线菊 Spiraea pubescens	28.72	35.32	‒
	平榛 Corylus heterophylla	56.66	53.24	‒
	小叶鼠李 Rhamnus parvifolia	‒	1.95	‒
	胡枝子 Lespedeza bicolor	14.62	6.98	‒
	山刺梅 Rosa davurica	‒	2.51	‒
	兴安柳 Salix hsinganica	‒	‒	100.00
草本层Herb	地榆 Sanguisorba officinalis	5.44	7.46	6.58
	东方草莓 Fragaria orientalis	16.56	10.82	‒
	兴安苔草 Carex chinganensis	29.61	38.37	36.45
	蒙古蒿 Mongolian wormwood	2.22	‒	‒
	唐松草Thalictrum petaloideum	4.25	4.67	1.10
	鼠掌老鹳草 Geranium sibiricum	3.31	5.07	15.41
	野火球 Trifolium lupinaster	2.66	2.95	0.91
	白莲蒿 Artemisia sacrorum	4.79	4.95	7.97
	龙牙草 Agrimonia pilosa	1.14	‒	2.53
	黑沙蒿 Artemisia ordosica	1.17	1.56	‒
	细叶鸢尾 Iris tenuifolia	4.79	3.12	3.26
	小红菊 Dendranthema chanetii	7.71	4.27	‒
	茜草 Rubia cordifolia	1.31	1.06	4.43
	费菜 Sedum aizoon	3.59	1.21	‒
	冰草 Agropyron cristatum	5.08	3.69	‒
	东北酸模 Rumex thyrsiflorus	0.84	‒	3.73
	狗尾草 Setaria viridis	‒	0.86	5.37
	铃兰 Convallaria majalis	‒	1.05	‒
	楔叶菊 Dendranthema naktongense	‒	1.19	‒
	柴胡 Bupleurum chinense	‒	1.17	‒
	益母草 Leonurus artemisia	‒	1.05	‒
	橐吾 Ligularia spp.	‒	‒	4.17

层 Layer	物种多样性指数 Species diversity index	落叶松林 Larch forest	白桦-落叶松混交林 Birch-larch forest	白桦林 Birch forest
乔木层 Arbor	丰富度R	2.67±1.53ab	4.33±0.58a	2.00±0b
	Simpson指数D	0.21±0.20b	0.67±0.01a	0.13±0.18b
	Shannon-Wienner 指数H	0.43±0.40b	1.25±0.03a	0.22±0.26b
	Pielou指数1 J_sw	0.31±0.29b	0.86±0.05a	0.29±0.33b
	Pielou指数2 J_si	0.28±0.26a	0.88±0.04a	0.28±0.40a
	Alatalo指数E_a	0.33±0.29b	0.83±0.06a	0.49±0.21ab
灌木层 Shrub	丰富度R	3.00±0a	3.33±1.53a	1.00±0b
	Simpson指数D	0.36±0.08a	0.59±0.34a	0.00b
	Shannon-Wienner 指数H	0.63±0.14a	0.62±0.20a	0.00b
	Pielou指数1 J_sw	0.58±0.13a	0.58±0.19a	0.00b
	Pielou指数2 J_si	0.53±0.13ab	0.90±0.49a	0.00b
	Alatalo指数E_a	0.63±0.04a	0.65±0.11a	0.00b
草本层 Herb	丰富度R	16.00±2.00a	15.67±2.08a	10.67±2.08b
	Simpson指数D	0.77±0.07a	0.78±0.07a	0.84±0.02a
	Shannon-Wienner 指数H	1.79±0.24a	1.96±0.29a	2.04±0.10a
	Pielou指数1 J_sw	0.65±0.07b	0.71±0.07ab	0.87±0.03a
	Pielou指数2 J_si	0.82±0.07a	0.84±0.07a	0.93±0.01a
	Alatalo指数E_a	0.68±0.06ab	0.62±0.05b	0.77±0.02a

扎兰屯地区典型天然林群落特征及其相关性分析

Community Characteristics and Their Correlation Analysis of Typical Natural Forest in Zhalantun

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 28

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

群落特征参数 Community characteristic parameter	PCA
群落特征参数 Community characteristic parameter	Axis 1	Axis 2	Axis 3	Axis 4
特征值 Eigenvalues	0.6842	0.2037	0.0398	0.0388
累积贡献率 Explained variation (cumulative)	68.42	88.79	92.77	96.65

[1]	李阳, 侯志勇, 陈薇, 于晓英, 谢永宏, 黄鑫, 谭佩阳, 李继承, 黎尚林, 杨辉. 大围山高山湿地植物多样性与区系组成研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(4): 643-650.
[2]	王哲, 田胜尼, 张永梅, 张和禹, 周忠泽. 巢湖派河口滩涂植物群落特征研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(9): 1823-1831.
[3]	王礼霄, 刘晋仙, 柴宝峰. 华北亚高山土壤细菌群落及氮循环对退耕还草的响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(8): 1537-1546.
[4]	张博文, 秦娟, 任忠明, 陈子齐, 姚舜佳, 刘烨, 宋炎玉. 坡向对北亚热带区马尾松纯林及不同针阔混交林型林下植物多样性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(6): 1091-1100.
[5]	段文军, 李达, 李冲. 5种不同林龄尾巨桉人工林林下植物多样性及其影响因素分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(5): 857-864.
[6]	胡靓达, 周海菊, 黄永珍, 姚贤宇, 叶绍明, 喻素芳. 不同杉木林分类型植物多样性及其土壤碳氮关系的研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(3): 451-459.
[7]	玄锦, 李祖婵, 邹诚, 秦子博, 吴雅华, 黄柳菁. 江心洲景观类型和格局对植物多样性的多尺度影响——以闽江流域福州段为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(12): 2320-2330.
[8]	陈双双, 朱宁华, 周光益, 袁星明, 尚海, 王迤翾. 不同等级石漠化环境下人工乔木林的植被与土壤物理特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(1): 52-61.
[9]	闫东锋, 张妍妍, 吕康婷, 周梦丽, 王婷, 赵宁. 太行山南麓不同海拔梯度天然林优势树种生态位特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(8): 1571-1580.
[10]	祁雪连, 葛晓敏, 钱壮壮, 张康, 郑旭, 钱琦, 丁晖, 唐罗忠. 武夷山天然针阔混交林与毛竹人工林土壤性质差异[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(8): 1599-1606.
[11]	王一荃, 周璋, 李意德, 陈德祥, 张涛, 杨繁. 不同热带森林空气负离子浓度评价研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(5): 898-906.
[12]	林丽, 代磊, 林泽北, 吴际通, 颜伟, 王志杰. 黔中城市森林群落植物多样性及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(11): 2130-2141.