生态环境学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 875-884.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.06.005
李琴(
), 郑强*(
), 杨卫君**(
), 张力月, 王梓, 赵立宁
收稿日期:2025-10-20
修回日期:2026-03-20
接受日期:2026-03-24
出版日期:2026-06-18
发布日期:2026-06-08
通讯作者:
** 杨卫君,E-mail: 作者简介:李琴(2002年生),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为作物栽培。E-mail: l200347_q@163.com基金资助:
LI Qin(
), ZHENG Qiang*(
), YANG Weijun**(
), ZHANG Liyue, WANG Zi, ZHAO Lining
Received:2025-10-20
Revised:2026-03-20
Accepted:2026-03-24
Online:2026-06-18
Published:2026-06-08
摘要:
探究减量灌水配施生物炭对北疆灌区麦田土壤团聚体稳定性及其碳氮分布的影响,为灌区农田土壤改良和节水灌溉提供理论依据。采用随机区组设计,设4个生物炭用量(B0:0 t·hm−2;B1:10 t·hm−2;B2:20 t·hm−2;B3:30 t·hm−2)和2个灌水量(W0:4.50×103 m3·hm−2常规灌溉;W1:4.05×103 m3·hm−2减量灌水),共8个处理,分析不同处理下不同土层(0-20 cm,20-40 cm)土壤团聚体及其碳氮含量变化。结果表明:各处理下土壤团聚体主要以0.25-2 mm团聚体为主,其中减量灌水配施生物炭20 t·hm−2时各土层土壤0.25-2 mm团聚体占比最高(B2W1),分别为46.4%(0-20 cm土层)和46.2%(20-40 cm);施用生物炭20 t·hm−2显著提升了0-20 cm土层土壤团聚体平均质量直径、几何质量直径和>0.25 mm大团聚体含量(p<0.01),较不施生物炭处理分别增加8.66%、11.7%和2.91%;>2 mm粒级土壤团聚体的碳氮比。各粒级团聚体的有机碳和全氮含量均随生物炭施用量增加而显著增加,且减量灌水条件下的有机碳和全氮含量均高于常规灌溉。综上,减量灌水配施生物炭能够有效促进土壤大团聚体的形成并提高其稳定性,同时通过调控土壤碳氮水平进一步提升土壤肥力,当生物炭施用20 t·hm−2时具有最佳的改良效果。该研究可为北疆灌区农田合理施用生物炭以及节水灌溉提供理论依据和数据支撑。
中图分类号:
李琴, 郑强, 杨卫君, 张力月, 王梓, 赵立宁. 减量灌水配施生物炭对麦田土壤团聚体及其碳氮分布的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(6): 875-884.
LI Qin, ZHENG Qiang, YANG Weijun, ZHANG Liyue, WANG Zi, ZHAO Lining. Effects of Reduced Irrigation with Biochar Amendment on Soil Aggregates and Their Carbon-Nitrogen Distribution in Wheat Fields[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(6): 875-884.
| 土层/ cm | 处理 | 不同粒级的土壤团聚体质量分数/% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >2 mm | 0.25-2 mm | 0.053-0.25 mm | <0.053 mm | ||||
| 0-20 | B0W0 | 26.03±4.94b | 47.81±4.21a | 22.38±2.33a | 3.32±0.30ab | ||
| B1W0 | 25.03±3.38b | 45.83±4.31ab | 25.61±2.00a | 3.53±0.47ab | |||
| B2W0 | 29.68±4.32ab | 46.31±1.66ab | 20.22±4.07a | 3.79±1.40ab | |||
| B3W0 | 24.12±5.60b | 47.33±1.75a | 23.06±3.99a | 5.49±0.05ab | |||
| B0W1 | 25.81±4.30b | 43.38±3.28ab | 26.15±2.66a | 4.66±1.03ab | |||
| B1W1 | 25.22±4.82b | 44.12±0.98ab | 25.63±4.41a | 5.03±1.27ab | |||
| B2W1 | 23.38±1.53b | 46.38±1.54ab | 24.37±1.79a | 5.87±0.81a | |||
| B3W1 | 23.33±2.04b | 45.77±3.98ab | 25.01±3.71a | 5.89±0.82a | |||
| 20-40 | B0W0 | 32.52±2.71ab | 39.38±8.40b | 24.89±10.58a | 3.21±0.52b | ||
| B1W0 | 26.41±7.45ab | 48.26±1.12a | 21.72±5.29a | 3.61±1.80ab | |||
| B2W0 | 35.05±4.28a | 41.99±1.11ab | 19.26±3.94a | 3.69±0.73ab | |||
| B3W0 | 29.78±2.36ab | 44.91±2.33ab | 21.49±0.82a | 3.82±0.72ab | |||
| B0W1 | 25.15±6.71b | 44.63±1.40ab | 25.78±6.31a | 4.44±1.21ab | |||
| B1W1 | 24.41±2.58b | 43.47±2.61ab | 27.12±3.31a | 5.00±1.57ab | |||
| B2W1 | 24.19±3.20b | 46.21±0.99ab | 24.88±2.08a | 4.72±1.60ab | |||
| B3W1 | 29.37±5.04ab | 44.65±1.12ab | 22.36±5.65a | 3.61±0.81ab | |||
| B | * | ns | * | * | |||
| W | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||
| B×W | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||
表1 不同处理下土壤团聚体质量分数
Table 1 Percentage content of soil aggregates under different treatments
| 土层/ cm | 处理 | 不同粒级的土壤团聚体质量分数/% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >2 mm | 0.25-2 mm | 0.053-0.25 mm | <0.053 mm | ||||
| 0-20 | B0W0 | 26.03±4.94b | 47.81±4.21a | 22.38±2.33a | 3.32±0.30ab | ||
| B1W0 | 25.03±3.38b | 45.83±4.31ab | 25.61±2.00a | 3.53±0.47ab | |||
| B2W0 | 29.68±4.32ab | 46.31±1.66ab | 20.22±4.07a | 3.79±1.40ab | |||
| B3W0 | 24.12±5.60b | 47.33±1.75a | 23.06±3.99a | 5.49±0.05ab | |||
| B0W1 | 25.81±4.30b | 43.38±3.28ab | 26.15±2.66a | 4.66±1.03ab | |||
| B1W1 | 25.22±4.82b | 44.12±0.98ab | 25.63±4.41a | 5.03±1.27ab | |||
| B2W1 | 23.38±1.53b | 46.38±1.54ab | 24.37±1.79a | 5.87±0.81a | |||
| B3W1 | 23.33±2.04b | 45.77±3.98ab | 25.01±3.71a | 5.89±0.82a | |||
| 20-40 | B0W0 | 32.52±2.71ab | 39.38±8.40b | 24.89±10.58a | 3.21±0.52b | ||
| B1W0 | 26.41±7.45ab | 48.26±1.12a | 21.72±5.29a | 3.61±1.80ab | |||
| B2W0 | 35.05±4.28a | 41.99±1.11ab | 19.26±3.94a | 3.69±0.73ab | |||
| B3W0 | 29.78±2.36ab | 44.91±2.33ab | 21.49±0.82a | 3.82±0.72ab | |||
| B0W1 | 25.15±6.71b | 44.63±1.40ab | 25.78±6.31a | 4.44±1.21ab | |||
| B1W1 | 24.41±2.58b | 43.47±2.61ab | 27.12±3.31a | 5.00±1.57ab | |||
| B2W1 | 24.19±3.20b | 46.21±0.99ab | 24.88±2.08a | 4.72±1.60ab | |||
| B3W1 | 29.37±5.04ab | 44.65±1.12ab | 22.36±5.65a | 3.61±0.81ab | |||
| B | * | ns | * | * | |||
| W | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||
| B×W | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||
| 土层/cm | 回归方程 | r2 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-20 | MMD=0.027X1−0.007X2−0.017X3−0.02X4+1.987 | 0.983** |
| GMD=0.019X1+0.002X2−0.014X3−0.02X4+0.729 | 0.978** | |
| Rd>0.25=0.004X1+0.004X2−0.005X3−0.005X4+0.568 | 0.990** | |
| 20-40 | MMD=0.018X1−0.016X2−0.023X3−0.047X4+2.872 | 0.985** |
| GMD=0.01X1−0.003X2−0.018X3−0.049X4+1.407 | 0.968** | |
| Rd>0.25=0.002X1+0.002X2−0.007X3−0.01X4+0.765 | 0.978** |
表2 团聚体稳定性与团聚体粒级的逐步回归方程
Table 2 Stepwise regression equations for aggregate stability and aggregate particle size
| 土层/cm | 回归方程 | r2 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-20 | MMD=0.027X1−0.007X2−0.017X3−0.02X4+1.987 | 0.983** |
| GMD=0.019X1+0.002X2−0.014X3−0.02X4+0.729 | 0.978** | |
| Rd>0.25=0.004X1+0.004X2−0.005X3−0.005X4+0.568 | 0.990** | |
| 20-40 | MMD=0.018X1−0.016X2−0.023X3−0.047X4+2.872 | 0.985** |
| GMD=0.01X1−0.003X2−0.018X3−0.049X4+1.407 | 0.968** | |
| Rd>0.25=0.002X1+0.002X2−0.007X3−0.01X4+0.765 | 0.978** |
图2 不同处理下土壤有机碳含量及各粒级团聚体有机碳分布 S1、S1分别代表0-20、20-40 cm土层;图中径向刻度尺表示不同处理下土壤团聚体的有机碳含量,单位为g·kg?1;图中不同小写英文字母表示处理之间差异显著(p<0.05)。下同
Figure 2 Soil organic carbon content and organic carbon distribution of aggregates of particle size under different treatments
图3 不同处理下各粒级土壤团聚体有机碳贡献率 图中百分数表示不同粒级土壤团聚体有机碳贡献率占比;S1、S2代表0-20、20-40 cm土层且图中由内向外依次为B0W0、B1W0、B2W0、B3W0、B0W1、B1W1、B2W1、B3W1处理。下同
Figure 3 Contribution rate of organic carbon of soil aggregates of different particle sizes under different treatments
图4 不同处理下土壤全氮含量及各粒级团聚体全氮分布
Figure 4 Soil total nitrogen content and total nitrogen distribution of aggregates of particle size under different treatments
| [1] |
HU X J, GU H D, LIU J J, et al., 2022. Metagenomics reveals divergent functional profiles of soil carbon and nitrogen cycling under long-term addition of chemical and organic fertilizers in the black soil region[J]. Geoderma, 418: 115846.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
LIU J, JIANG B S, SHEN J L, et al., 2021. Contrasting effects of straw and straw-derived biochar applications on soil carbon accumulation and nitrogen use efficiency in double-rice cropping systems[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 311: 107286.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
PANG J W, WANG Y H, WANG B F, et al., 2023. Biochar application increases maize yield under film mulching due to higher soil organic content and soil aggregate stability in a semi-arid area[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 23(4): 1718-1732.
DOI |
| [4] |
RABOT E, WIESMEIER M, SCHLUER S, et al., 2018. Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: A review[J]. Geoderma, 314: 122-137.
DOI URL |
| [5] | SU R L, WU X, HU J L, et al., 2023. Warming promotes the decomposition of oligotrophic bacterial-driven organic matter in paddy soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 186: 109-156. |
| [6] |
WANG Y H, PANG J W, ZHANG M J, et al., 2023. Is adding biochar be better than crop straw for improving soil aggregates stability and organic carbon contents in film mulched fields in semiarid regions? -Evidence of 5-year field experiment[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 338: 117711.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
WU J J, ZHOU B, LI Z C, et al., 2025. Biochar promoted soil organic carbon accumulation and aggregate stability by increasing the content of organic complex metal oxides in paddy soil[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 254: 106713.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
YANG S H, XIAO Y N, SUN X, et al., 2019. Biochar improved rice yield and mitigated CH4 and N2O emissions from paddy field under controlled irrigation in the Taihu Lake Region of China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 200: 69-77.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
ZHANG C, ZHAO X, LIANG A J, et al., 2023. Insight into the soil aggregate-mediated restoration mechanism of degraded black soil via biochar addition: Emphasizing the driving role of core microbial communities and nutrient cycling[J]. Environmental Research, 228: 115895.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
ZIMMERMAN A R, GAO B, AHN M Y, 2011. Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43(6): 1169-1179.
DOI URL |
| [11] | 鲍士旦, 2000. 土壤农化分析[M]. 第3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社. |
| BAO S D, 2000. Soil agricultural chemical analysis[M]. Third edition. Beijing: China Agriculture Press. | |
| [12] | 曹玉凤, 佟师师, 岳岐, 等, 2025. 生物炭对棕壤团聚体稳定性及磷组分分布的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 33(3): 520-530. |
| CAO Y F, TONG S S, YUE Q, et al., 2025. Effect of biochar on the stability and distribution of phosphorus fractions of brown soil aggregates[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 33(3): 520-530. | |
| [13] | 陈全, 陈丽芳, 吴丹萍, 等, 2023. 土壤矿物质增强生物炭稳定性的机制综述[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 42(3): 490-499. |
| CHEN Q, CHEN L F, WU D P, et al., 2023. Mechanisms of soil minerals enhance biochar stability: A review[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 42(3): 490-499. | |
| [14] |
邓铭江, 王全九, 陶汪海, 等, 2023. 西北旱区现代农业提质增效发展模式探究[J]. 中国工程科学, 25(4): 59-72.
DOI |
|
DENG M J, WANG Q J, TAO W H, et al., 2023. Development model for improving the quality and efficiency of modern agriculture in the arid region of northwest China[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 25(4): 59-72.
DOI |
|
| [15] | 方婧, 金亮, 程磊磊, 等, 2019. 环境中生物质炭稳定性研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 56(5): 1034-1047. |
| FANG J, JIN L, CHENG L L, et al., 2019. Advancement in research on stability of biochar in the environment[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 56(5): 1034-1047. | |
| [16] |
黄坤, 许明, 吴秀娟, 等, 2024. 生物质活性炭的制备与微结构特性调控研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 43(5): 2475-2493.
DOI |
|
HUANG K, XU M, WU X J, et al., 2024. Research progress on preparation and microstructural characteristics regulation of biomass activated carbon[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 43(5): 2475-2493.
DOI |
|
| [17] |
黄霖锋, 陈利荣, 张承焱, 等, 2026. 滴灌与间作对盐碱地水盐运移及高粱产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 37(1): 125-135.
DOI |
|
HUANG L F, CHEN L R, ZHANG C Y, et al., 2026. Effects of drip irrigation and intercropping on soil water-salt dynamics and sorghum yield in saline-alkali land[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 37(1): 125-135.
DOI |
|
| [18] |
黄炜怡, 黄芬, 谢银财, 等, 2025. 土壤改良对土壤有机碳和岩溶作用影响机制及其碳汇效应[J]. 地球科学进展, 40(6): 559-576.
DOI |
|
HUANG W Y, HUANG F, XIE Y C, et al., 2025. Mechanism of soil improvement affecting soil organic carbon and karst processes: Implications for carbon sequestration[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 40(6): 559-576.
DOI |
|
| [19] | 黄文智, 陈学文, 梁爱珍, 等, 2025. 土壤团聚体孔隙及其表征方法[J]. 土壤与作物, 14(2): 129-143. |
| HUANG W Z, CHEN X W, LIANG A Z, et al., 2025. Soil aggregate pores and their characterization methods[J]. Soils and Crops, 4(2): 129-143. | |
| [20] | 黄治宏, 赵浩宾, 王龙飞, 等, 2025. 生物炭对土壤酶活性、生态功能研究进展及作用机制分析[J]. 中国土壤与肥料 (1): 250-259. |
| HUANG Z H, ZHAO H B, WANG L F, et al., 2025. Research progress and mechanism analysis of biochar on soil enzyme activity and ecological function[J]. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China (1): 250-259. | |
| [21] | 季卫英, 管丹蓉, 宓立峰, 等, 2024. 不同土地利用方式对土壤团聚体稳定性及碳氮含量的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 44(6): 377-386. |
| JI W Y, GUAN D R, MI L F, et al., 2024. Effects of different land-use patterns on soil aggregate stability and contents of carbon and nitrogen[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 44(6): 377-386. | |
| [22] | 蒋雪洋, 张前前, 沈浩杰, 等, 2021. 生物质炭对稻田土壤团聚体稳定性和微生物群落的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 58(6): 1564-1573. |
| JIANG X Y, ZHANG Q Q, SHEN H J, et al., 2021. Effects of biochar on soil aggregate stability and microbial community in paddy field[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 58(6): 1564-1573. | |
| [23] | 李晨, 陈明婉, 金鑫, 等, 2023. 施入生物炭对热带农田土壤团聚体组成及碳氮含量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 54(5): 1071-1079. |
| LI C, CHEN M W, JIN X, et al., 2023. Effects of biochar application on soil aggregate composition and carbon and nitrogen contents in tropical farmland[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 54(5): 1071-1079. | |
| [24] | 李堃, 龙思帆, 吴硕廷, 等, 2024. 施用生物炭对柏木林地土壤有机碳含量和团聚体稳定性的影响[J]. 四川林业科技, 45(4): 1-5. |
| LI K, LONG S F, WU S T, et al., 2024. Effects of biochar application on soil organic carbon content and aggregate stability in Cupressus funebris forest standv[J]. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 45(4): 1-5. | |
| [25] | 李耸耸, 2020. 干旱对土壤团聚体稳定性的影响及其调控机制[J]. 草原与草业, 32(3): 12-14, 33. |
| LI S S, 2020. Review on effect of drought on soil aggregates stability and its biological regulation mechanism[J]. Grassland and Prataculture, 32(3): 12-14, 33. | |
| [26] |
龙吉兰, 蒋铮, 刘定琴, 等, 2024. 干旱下植物根系分泌物及其介导的根际激发效应研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 48(7): 817-827.
DOI |
|
LONG J L, JIANG Z, LIU D Q, et al., 2024. Effects of drought on plant root exudates and associated rhizosphere priming effect: Review and prospect[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 48(7): 817-827.
DOI URL |
|
| [27] | 龙杰琦, 苗淑杰, 李娜, 等, 2022. 施用生物炭对黑土各组分有机质结构的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 28(5): 775-785. |
| LONG J Q, MIAO S J, LI N, et al., 2022. Effects of biochar application on the structural properties of organic matter fractions in Mollisols[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 28(5): 775-785. | |
| [28] | 罗慧, 刘水, 李伏生, 2014. 不同灌水施肥策略对土壤微生物量碳氮和酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 34(18): 5266-5274. |
| LUO H, LIU S, LI F S, et al., 2014. Effect of different irrigation and fertilization strategies on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen and enzyme activity[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(18): 5266-5274. | |
| [29] | 马小明, 齐翔鲲, 谭雪, 等, 2026. 免耕秸秆覆盖对半干旱区土壤团聚体稳定性和玉米产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志 (1): 152-159. |
| MA X M, QI X K, TAN X, et al., 2026. Effects of no-tillage with straw mulching on soil aggregate stability and maize yield in semi-arid region[J]. Crops (1): 152-159. | |
| [30] | 孟艳, 沈亚文, 孟维伟, 等, 2023. 生物炭施用对农田土壤团聚体及有机碳影响的整合分析[J]. 环境科学, 44(12): 6847-6856. |
| MENH Y, SHEN Y W, MENG W W, et al., 2023. Effect of biochar on agricultural soil aggregates and organic carbon: A meta-analysis[J]. Environmental Science, 44(12): 6847-6856. | |
| [31] |
庞津雯, 王钰皓, 陶宏扬, 等, 2023. 生物炭不同添加量对旱作覆膜农田土壤团聚体特性及有机碳含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 56(9): 1729-1743.
DOI |
|
PANG J W, WANG Y H, TAO H Y, et al., 2023. Effects of different biochar application rates on soil aggregate characteristics and organic carbon contents for film-mulching field in semiarid areas[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 56(9): 1729-1743.
DOI |
|
| [32] | 庞小能, 于爱忠, 王玉珑, 等, 2025. 不同耕作与秸秆还田方式对土壤团聚体及碳氮储量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 33(10): 1922-1937. |
| PANG X N, YU A Z, WANG Y L, et al., 2025. Effects of different tillage practices and straw returning methods on soil aggregates and carbon-nitrogen storage[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 33(10): 1922-1937. | |
| [33] | 孙雪, 张玉铭, 张丽娟, 等, 2021. 长期添加外源有机物料对华北农田土壤团聚体有机碳组分的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 29(8): 1384-1396. |
| SUN X, ZHANG Y M, ZHANG L J, et al., 2021. Effects of long-term exogenous organic material addition on the organic carbon composition of soil aggregates in farmlands of North China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 29(8): 1384-1396. | |
| [34] | 谭文峰, 许运, 史志华, 等, 2023. 胶结物质驱动的土壤团聚体形成过程与稳定机制[J]. 土壤学报, 60(5): 1297-1308. |
| TAN W F, XU Y, SHI Z H, et al., 2023. The formation process and stabilization mechanism of soil aggregates driven by binding materials[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 60(5): 1297-1308. | |
| [35] | 王强, 耿增超, 许晨阳, 等, 2020. 施用生物炭对塿土土壤微生物代谢养分限制和碳利用效率的影响[J]. 环境科学, 41(5): 2425-2433. |
| WANG Q, GENG Z C, XU C Y, et al., 2020. Effects of biochar application on soil microbial nutrient limitations and carbon use efficiency in lou soil[J]. Environmental Science, 41(5): 2425-2433. | |
| [36] |
王莎莎, 陈俊玲, 张晓杰, 等, 2025. 有机肥替代化肥与生物炭配施对茶园土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳积累的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 46(4): 937-947.
DOI |
|
WANG S S, CHEN J L, ZHANG X J, et al., 2025. Impacts of substituting chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer in conjunction with biochar on soil aggregate stability and accumulation of organic carbon in tea plantations[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 46(4): 937-947.
DOI |
|
| [37] | 谢钧宇, 曹寒冰, 孟会生, 等, 2020. 不同施肥措施及施肥年限下土壤团聚体的大小分布及其稳定性[J]. 水土保持学报, 34(3): 274-281, 290. |
| XIE J Y, CAO H B, MENG H S, et al., 2020. Effects of different fertilization regimes and fertilization ages on size distribution and stability of soil aggregates[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 34(3): 274-281, 290. | |
| [38] | 薛兆琨, 俞柯汝, 马嘉伟, 等, 2025. 生物炭与有机肥配施对土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳贡献率的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 57(7): 108-115. |
| XUE Z K, YU K R, MA J W, et al., 2025. Effects of combined application of biochar and organic fertilizer on soil aggregate stability and contribution of organic carbon[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 57(7): 108-115. | |
| [39] | 杨小立, 蔡竟芳, 王大郅, 等, 2025. 淹水和互花米草生物炭对滨海湿地土壤理化特征和微生物群落的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 45(8): 288-301. |
| YANG X L, CAI J F, WANG D Z, et al., 2025. Effects of flooding and Spartina alterniflora-derived biochar on soil physicochemical properties and microbial communities in coastal wetlands[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 45(8): 288-301. | |
| [40] | 朱士江, 叶晓思, 王斌, 等, 2018. 不同水分调控、生物炭配比对水稻产量与水分利用效率的影响[J]. 节水灌溉 (1): 1-5. |
| ZHU S J, YE X S, WANG B, et al., 2018. Effects of water-biochar coupling on rice yield and water use efficiency[J]. Water Saving Irrigation (1): 1-5. |
| [1] | 李梦, 韩亚峰, 胡艺宝, 姜梦晓, 张鑫, 高佳凯, 马任甜, 郑宾, 张烨, 孙丽蓉, 郭大勇, 石兆勇, 王旭刚. 不同化学结构外源碳添加对稻田土壤有机碳组分及碳排放的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(6): 865-874. |
| [2] | 李赢, 黄华丽, 张帆, 韩艳刚. 邻体相互作用对温带次生林树木生长及稳定性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(6): 922-927. |
| [3] | 黄绍强, 江恒, 余世钦, 蒋新宇, 程炯, 陈三雄. 小球藻对广东红壤团聚体水稳性及其胞外聚合物组分的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(3): 425-436. |
| [4] | 李彦霖, 徐红伟, 徐琳, 骆紫藤, 袁亚玲, 谭波. 带状改造对柳杉人工林土壤水稳性团聚体组成及稳定性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(2): 223-231. |
| [5] | 史广宇, 沈新怡. 共热解技术对污泥中重金属的固定及资源化利用研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(2): 323-332. |
| [6] | 王国琳, 刘凯英, 宋宁宁, 刘君, 王芳丽, 王学霞, 宗海英, 李绍静. 盐碱土有机态氮组分对秸秆及秸秆生物炭输入的响应机理[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(1): 62-74. |
| [7] | 张义栋, 杨旭楠, 陈艳姣, 汪涛, 许玫英. FT-IR技术在水体沉积物有机碳分析中的应用研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(9): 1483-1494. |
| [8] | 柳凤娟, 马超, 黄玲涵, 陈琪, 罗绪强. 生物炭添加对尾砂污染土壤中As和Sb植物有效性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(8): 1273-1281. |
| [9] | 贺环, 周丹丹, 马芷萱, 李芳芳, 秦珊珊, 豆思娴. 钙改性对生物炭中溶解性有机质与Cd(Ⅱ)结合的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(7): 1121-1132. |
| [10] | 林泳怡, 周燕飞, 邓金环, 田纪辉, 蔡昆争. 生物炭与磷添加促进赤红壤的硅形态转化和大豆植株硅吸收转运[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(5): 710-719. |
| [11] | 吴小令, 杜衍红, 窦飞, 高双全, 王向琴. 生物炭和腐殖质治理重金属污染菜地的定位试验研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(12): 1952-1961. |
| [12] | 王永梅, 袁雨珍, 王梓成, 李志丰, 高双全, 刘传平, 杜衍红. 生物炭协同化肥减量对重金属污染土壤甜玉米安全生产的长期效应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(12): 1962-1973. |
| [13] | 赵程潇, 马江鸿, 刘虹霞, 胡静雯, 潘姿彤, 王嘉莹, 李金页. 生物炭对人工湿地的强化脱氮作用[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(12): 1985-1992. |
| [14] | 孔小云, 张永坤, 李润杰, 李颖, 林成清, 马占明, 辛继林, 杨晓璇, 党怡乐, 赵家艺, 冯玲正, 周燕. 湟水河流域耕地土壤团聚体有机碳空间变异特征及其驱动因素分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(11): 1715-1727. |
| [15] | 吉波, 程红光, 韩世明, 邢丹, 吴志兵, 张金莲, 刘芳, 朱艺, 邓丽蓉, 张晓松. 生物炭与丛枝菌根真菌对土壤中磷供应影响的研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(11): 1812-1826. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||