鼎湖山不同类型森林物种多样性和功能多样性研究

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2025.08.007

生态环境学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 1219-1227.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2025.08.007

鼎湖山不同类型森林物种多样性和功能多样性研究

李林¹(), 张朝阳¹, 储小雪¹^,^*(), 周景钢⁴^,⁵, 王雪²^,³, 魏识广²^,³

1.桂林电子科技大学生命与环境科学学院，广西桂林 541004
2.珍稀濒危动植物生态与环境保护教育部重点实验室，广西桂林 541006
3.广西漓江流域景观资源保育与可持续利用重点实验室，广西桂林 541006
4.中国科学院华南植物园，广东广州 510650
5.中国科学院退化生态系统植被恢复与管理重点实验室，广东广州 510650

收稿日期:2024-12-31 出版日期:2025-08-18 发布日期:2025-08-01
通讯作者: *E-mail: chuxiaoxue@guet.edu.cn
作者简介:李林（1978年生），女，博士研究生，研究方向为生物多样性保护和森林碳汇。E-mail: lilin@guet.edu.cn
基金资助:
广西自然科学基金项目(2022GXNSFAA035583);广西自然科学基金项目(2021GXNSFBA196052);国家自然科学基金项目(32460270)

Studies on Species Diversity and Functional Diversity of Different Types of Forests in Dinghu Mountains

LI Lin¹(), ZHANG Chaoyang¹, CHU Xiaoxue¹^,^*(), ZHOU Jinggang⁴^,⁵, WANG Xue²^,³, WEI Shiguang²^,³

1. Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, P. R. China
2. Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environment Protection, Ministry of Education, Guilin 541006, P. R. China
3. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Landscape Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization in Lijiang River Basin, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006, P. R. China
4. South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, P. R. China
5. Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of South China Botanical Garden of Degraded Ecosystems, Chinese Academy of Science, Guangzhou 510650, P. R. China

Received:2024-12-31 Online:2025-08-18 Published:2025-08-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

物种多样性和功能多样性的联动规律可以用于评价生物多样性对生态系统功能的影响。研究鼎湖山南亚热带森林物种和功能多样性的联动规律，对于监测区域生物多样性的意义重大。以鼎湖山5种不同类型1 hm²森林群落[南亚热带山地常绿阔叶林、沟谷雨林、常绿阔叶林（荷木林）、常绿针叶林（马尾松林）和针阔混交林]为研究对象，计算了3个物种多样性指数和4个功能多样性指数，采用多重比较法和线性回归分析不同森林群落物种多样性与功能多样性的差异和关系。结果表明，1）山地常绿阔叶林和沟谷雨林物种丰富度、Shannon-Weiner指数以及Pielou均匀度指数较高；常绿阔叶林（荷木林）功能丰富度和功能分散度较高，山地常绿阔叶林的功能均匀度和功能离散度较高。2）5个森林群落的Patrick丰富度指数、Shannon-Weiner指数都与功能丰富度指数显著相关；功能均匀度指数F_e都与Pielou均匀度指数显著正相关，而与Patrick丰富度指数和Shannon-Weiner指数无显著关系；功能离散度与物种多样性指数均存在显著的相关关系。3）海拔和坡度对功能多样性均具有显著的影响。该研究提示我们对森林群落的保护需要关注物种和功能多样性的联动关系，根据具体海拔和坡度主导的生境类型制定针对性的保护方案。

关键词: 森林群落, 物种多样性, 功能多样性, 地形因子, 南亚热带

Abstract:

The linkage between species and functional diversity can be used to evaluate the predictive effect of species diversity on functional diversity, and elucidating the relationship between species and functional diversity is key to revealing the impact of biodiversity on ecosystem functions. Dinghu Mountain is located in Guangdong Province, China, has a southern subtropical monsoon climate, abundant annual rainfall, and a forest community rich in species with complex and diverse structures. Exploring the linkage patterns between forest species diversity and functional diversity is of great significance for monitoring regional biodiversity. In this study, five different types of 1 hm² forest communities in Dinghu Mountain (south subtropical montane evergreen broadleaf forest, gully rainforest, evergreen broadleaf forest (Schima superba Gardn. et Champ forest), evergreen coniferous forest (Pinus massoniana Lamb forest) and mixed coniferous and broadleaved forest) were used for the study, and three indices of species diversity (Patrick’s Richness Index, Shannon-Weiner's Diversity Index, Pielou’s Evenness Index) and four indices of functional diversity (Functional Richness Index F_r, Functional Evenness Index F_e, Functional Discrete Index F_v, Functional Dispersal Index F_d) were calculated using a multiple comparison method.). Four functional diversity indices (Functional Richness Index F_r, Functional Uniformity Index F_e, Functional Dispersion Index F_v, Functional Dispersion Index F_d) were used, and the multiple comparison method was used to study the differences between species diversity and functional diversity in different forest types. Linear regression was used to analyze the relationship between species and functional diversity in different forest communities. The results showed that 1) the species diversity and functional diversity of the southern subtropical forest communities in the Dinghushan Mountain differed to some extent, with higher values of the Patrick index of richness, Shannon-Weiner index, and Pielou evenness index in the southern subtropical montane evergreen broadleaf forests and gully rainforests, which indicated that they were richer in species diversity. The degree of functional richness and functional dispersion of the evergreen broadleaf forests was higher, and the degree of functional uniformity and functional dispersion of the montane evergreen broadleaf forests had higher functional evenness and functional dispersion. 2) The correlation between the Patrick richness, Shannon-Weiner, and functional richness indices was significant; the functional evenness index, F_e, was positively correlated with the Pielou evenness index, but not significantly correlated with the Patrick richness, and Shannon-Weiner indices; the functional dispersal index was significantly correlated with the species diversity index were significantly correlated. 3) This study found that elevation and slope have significant effects on the functional diversity of southern subtropical forests in Dinghushan, and slope, which is related to elevation, is also an important factor. Dinghushan belongs to the southern subtropical region, which is rich in forest vegetation and has a different correlation of species diversity and functional diversity than other regions at the same latitude, where forest cover is limited. This study suggests that we need to pay attention to the linkage between species and functional diversity in the protection of forest communities and formulate targeted protection programs according to specific habitat types.

Key words: forest community, species diversity, functional diversity, environmental factors, South Subtropical

中图分类号:

Q948
X176

李林, 张朝阳, 储小雪, 周景钢, 王雪, 魏识广. 鼎湖山不同类型森林物种多样性和功能多样性研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(8): 1219-1227.

LI Lin, ZHANG Chaoyang, CHU Xiaoxue, ZHOU Jinggang, WANG Xue, WEI Shiguang. Studies on Species Diversity and Functional Diversity of Different Types of Forests in Dinghu Mountains[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(8): 1219-1227.

图/表 6

表1 鼎湖山（DHS）5个卫星样地的基本信息

Table 1 The basic information of the five satellite plots in Dinghushan (DHS)

样地号	森林群落类型	海拔/m	原点北纬（N）	原点东经（E）
1	南亚热带山地常绿阔叶林	602－660	23°10′34″	112°31′30″
2	南亚热带常绿阔叶林（荷木林）	182－256	23°08′22″	112°30′49″
3	南亚热带沟谷雨林	90－133	23°10′15″	112°32′29″
4	南亚热带常绿针叶林（马尾松林）	38－93	23°09′58″	112°33′28″
5	南亚热带针阔混交林	50－85	23°09′41″	112°32′36″

表2 物种多样性和功能多样性指数

Table 2 Species Diversity and Functional Diversity Diversity Index

序号	指标	公式	参数描述	表征说明
1	Patrick丰富度指数	R=S	任意两个个体为不同物种的概率p时，p_i——第i个物种的相对多度；S——目标样地中的总物种数	指数值越大表征群落的α物种多样性越高
2	Shannon-Weiner指数	$H = − ∑ i = 1 s (p i ln p i)$
3	Pielou均匀度指数	$J = H ln S$
4	功能均匀度指数	$F e = ∑ i = 1 S − 1 min W i, 1 S − 1 − 1 S − 1 1 − 1 S − 1$	S——物种丰富度；W_i ——物种i的加权均匀度	指数值越大表征群落的功能多样性越高
5	功能丰富度指数	$F r = C i R c$	C_i ——群落i内物种所占据的生态位空间；R_c——特征c的绝对值	指数值越大表征群落的功能多样性越高
6	功能离散度指数	$F d = ∑ a j z j ∑ a j$	a_j ——物种j的多度；z_j ——物种j到加权质心的距离	指数值越大，表征物种功能性状在性状空间范围分布的离散程度越高
7	功能分散度指数	$d = ∑ i = 1 S P i × (G i − G l ¯)$ $F_{\mathrm{v}}=\frac{d+\overline{G_{l}}}{h+\overline{G_{l}}}$	G_i ——欧氏距离； $G l ¯$ ——各物种性状欧氏距离的均值；h——对d计算时取距离差绝对值所得；P_i ——物种i的相对多度	指数值越大，表征物种功能性状在性状空间范围分布的离散程度越高

表2 物种多样性和功能多样性指数

Table 2 Species Diversity and Functional Diversity Diversity Index

序号	指标	公式	参数描述	表征说明
1	Patrick丰富度指数	R=S	任意两个个体为不同物种的概率p时，p_i——第i个物种的相对多度；S——目标样地中的总物种数	指数值越大表征群落的α物种多样性越高
2	Shannon-Weiner指数	$H = − ∑ i = 1 s (p i ln p i)$
3	Pielou均匀度指数	$J = H ln S$
4	功能均匀度指数	$F e = ∑ i = 1 S − 1 min W i, 1 S − 1 − 1 S − 1 1 − 1 S − 1$	S——物种丰富度；W_i ——物种i的加权均匀度	指数值越大表征群落的功能多样性越高
5	功能丰富度指数	$F r = C i R c$	C_i ——群落i内物种所占据的生态位空间；R_c——特征c的绝对值	指数值越大表征群落的功能多样性越高
6	功能离散度指数	$F d = ∑ a j z j ∑ a j$	a_j ——物种j的多度；z_j ——物种j到加权质心的距离	指数值越大，表征物种功能性状在性状空间范围分布的离散程度越高
7	功能分散度指数	$d = ∑ i = 1 S P i × (G i − G l ¯)$ $F_{\mathrm{v}}=\frac{d+\overline{G_{l}}}{h+\overline{G_{l}}}$	G_i ——欧氏距离； $G l ¯$ ——各物种性状欧氏距离的均值；h——对d计算时取距离差绝对值所得；P_i ——物种i的相对多度	指数值越大，表征物种功能性状在性状空间范围分布的离散程度越高

表3 不同群落类型植物物种多样性差异

Table 3 Diversity of plant species in different communities

样地号	森林群落类型	Patrick丰富度指数	Shannon-Weiner指数	Pielou均匀度指数
1	南亚热带山地常绿阔叶林	14.44b	2.206a	0.831a
2	南亚热带常绿阔叶林（荷木林）	7.72d	1.401c	0.694b
3	南亚热带沟谷雨林	16.20a	2.199a	0.795a
4	南亚热带常绿针叶林（马尾松林）	8.28d	1.620b	0.784a
5	南亚热带针阔混交林	11.32c	1.515bc	0.627c

表4 不同群落植物功能多样性差异

Table 4 Differences in plant functional diversity in different communities

样地号	森林群落类型	功能丰富度指数	功能均匀度指数	功能分散度指数	功能离散度指数
1	南亚热带山地常绿阔叶林	0.011c	0.735a	0.849b	3.455a
2	南亚热带常绿阔叶林（荷木林）	0.293a	0.680b	0.911a	2.997c
3	南亚热带沟谷雨林	0.011c	0.683b	0.756c	2.965c
4	南亚热带常绿针叶林（马尾松林）	0.132b	0.682b	0.724c	3.029bc
5	南亚热带针阔混交林	0.044c	0.680b	0.866b	3.244ab

图1 鼎湖山南亚热带森林群落物种多样性与功能多样性的耦合关系

Figure 1 Coupled relationship between species diversity and functional diversity of southern subtropical forest communities in Dinghushan Mountain

图2 地形对鼎湖山南亚热带森林群落功能多样性的影响

Figure 2 Influence of topography on the functional diversity of southern subtropical forest communities in Dinghushan, China

参考文献 41

[1]	BAI X H, ZHANG J T, 2018. Environmental interpretation of forest communities in Xiaowutai Mountain by fuzzy mathematics analysis[J]. Ecological Informatics, 48: 178-186.
[2]	BELLO F D, LEPŠ J, SEBASTIÀ M, 2006. Variations in species and functional plant diversity along climatic and grazing gradients[J]. Ecography, 29(6): 801-810.
[3]	DÍAZ S, HODGSON J G, THOMPSON K, et al., 2004. The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 15(3): 295-304.
[4]	DRUCKENBROD D L, MARTIN B, ORWIG D A, et al., 2019. Redefining temperate forest responses to climate and disturbance in the eastern United States: New insights at the mesoscale[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 28(5): 557-575.
[5]	DURAN S M, MARTIN R E, DIAZ S, et al., 2019. Informing trait-based ecology by assessing remotely sensed functional diversity across a broad tropical temperature gradient[J]. Science Advances, 5(12): eaaw8114.
[6]	FLYNN D F, MIROTCHNICK N, JAIN M, et al., 2011. Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity-ecosystem-function relationships[J]. Ecology, 92(8): 1573-1581.
[7]	FU H, ZHONG J Y, YUAN G X, et al., 2014. Functional traits composition predicts macrophytes community productivity along a water depth gradient in a freshwater lake[J]. Ecology and Evolution, 4(9): 1516-1523.
[8]	HOOPER D U, VITOUSEK P M, 1997. The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes[J]. Science, 277(5330): 1302-1305.
[9]	LEGENDRE P, MI X C, REN H B, et al., 2009. Partitioning beta diversity in a subtropical broad-leaved forest of China[J]. Ecology, 90(3): 663-674. DOI PMID
[10]	LI L, WEN Z F, WEI S G, et al., 2022. Functional diversity and its influencing factors in a Subtropical forest community in China[J]. Forests, 13(7): 966.
[11]	MASON N W H, MOUILLOT D, LEE W G, et al., 2005. Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: The primary components of functional diversity[J]. Oikos, 111(1): 112-118.
[12]	MORELLI M C M, SOUZA C R D, MOREL J D, et al., 2021. Can small-scale altitudinal gradients predict spatial and temporal patterns in tropical forests?[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 32(5): 1855-1865.
[13]	PETCHEY O L, GASTON K J, 2006. Functional diversity: Back to basics and looking forward[J]. Ecology Letters, 9(6): 741-758. DOI PMID
[14]	R Core Team, 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing[M]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundational for Statistical Computing.
[15]	SCHRADER J, SHI P J, ROYER D L, et al., 2021. Leaf size estimation based on leaf length, width and shape[J]. Annals of Botany, 128(4): 395-406. DOI PMID
[16]	陈超, 朱志红, 李英年, 等, 2016. 高寒草甸种间性状差异和物种均匀度对物种多样性与功能多样性关系的影响[J]. 生态学报, 36(3): 661-674.
	CHEN C, ZHU Z H, LI Y N, et al., 2016. Effects of interspecific trait dissimilarity and species evenness on the relationship between species diversity and functional diversity in an alpine meadow[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(3): 661-674.
[17]	陈倩, 2019. 秦岭山地天然次生林群落物种多样性与功能多样性研究[D]. 西安: 西北农林科技大学: 1-61.
	CHEN Q, 2019. Study on species diversity and functional diversity of natural secondary forest communities in the Qinling Mountains[D]. Xi’an: Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University: 1-61.
[18]	陈又清, 2017. 功能多样性——生物多样性与生态系统功能关系研究的新视角[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 39(6): 1082-1088.
	CHEN Y Q, 2017. Functional diversity: A new viewpoint in the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research[J]. Journal of Yunnan University (Natural Science Edition), 39(6): 1082-1088.
[19]	董世魁, 汤琳, 张相锋, 等, 2017. 高寒草地植物物种多样性与功能多样性的关系[J]. 生态学报, 37(5): 1472-1483.
	DONG S K, TANG L, ZHANG X F, et al., 2017. Relationship between plant species diversity and functional diversity in alpine grasslands[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(5): 1472-1483.
[20]	段文军, 王金叶, 2013. 猫儿山自然保护区森林群落垂直格局与主导因素分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 22(4): 563-566.
	DUAN W J, WANG J Y, 2013. Vertical distribution pattern and determinant analysis of forest community in Maoer Mountain National Nature Reserve[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 22(4): 563-566.
[21]	葛兆轩, 孙国龙, 袁业, 等, 2017. 河北省森林草原区草本植物物种多样性和功能多样性[J]. 草业学报, 26(7): 35-44. DOI
	GE Z X, SUN G L, YUAN Y, et al., 2017. Herbaceous plant species diversity and functional diversity in the forest-steppe zone of Hebei, China[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 26(7): 35-44.
[22]	黄立新, 2016. 鼎湖山南亚热带不同成熟度常绿阔叶林群落功能多样性的对比研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学.
	HUANG L X, 2016. Comparative study on the functional diversity of evergreen broad-leaved forest communities with different maturity levels in the southern subtropics of Dinghu Mountain[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences.
[23]	江小雷, 张卫国, 2010. 功能多样性及其研究方法[J]. 生态学报, 30(10): 2766-2773.
	JIANG X L, ZHANG W G, 2010. Functional diversity and its research methods[J]. Journal of Ecology, 30(10): 2766-2773.
[24]	李晓强, 田平, 程小琴, 2017. 山西太岳山典型森林物种多样性和功能多样性关系研究[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 37(9): 628-634.
	LI X Q, TIAN P, CHENG X Q, 2017. The species and functional diversity of the typical forest of Taiyue Mountain, Shanxi, China[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 37(9): 628-634.
[25]	刘旻霞, 南笑宁, 张国娟, 等, 2021. 高寒草甸不同坡向植物群落物种多样性与功能多样性的关系[J]. 生态学报, 41(13): 5398-5407.
	LIU M X, NAN X N, ZHANG G J, et al., 2021. Relationship between species diversity and functional diversity of plant communities on different slopes in alpine meadow[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(13): 5398-5407.
[26]	刘旻霞, 张国娟, 李亮, 等, 2022. 甘南高寒草甸海拔梯度上功能多样性与生态系统多功能的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 33(5): 1291-1299. DOI
	LIU M X, ZHANG G J, LI L, et al., 2022. Relationship between functional diversity and ecosystem multifunctionality of alpine meadow along an altitude gradient in Gannan, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 33(5): 1291-1299.
[27]	马克平, 钱迎倩, 1998. 生物多样性保护及其研究进展[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 4(1): 96-100.
	MA K P, QIAN Y Q, 1998. Biodiversity conservation and its research progress[J]. Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 4(1): 96-100.
[28]	么旭阳, 胡耀升, 刘艳红, 2014. 长白山阔叶红松林不同群落类型的植物功能性状与功能多样性[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 42(3): 77-84.
	MU X Y, HU Y S, LIU Y H, 2014. Plant functional traits and diversities of different communities in broad-leaved Korean pine forests in the Changbai Mountain[J]. Journal of Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 42(3): 77-84.
[29]	任一星, 2012. 北京山区典型森林群落功能多样性研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学: 1-63.
	REN Y X, 2012. Functional diversity of typical forest communities in the mountainous areas of Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University: 1-63.
[30]	盛芝露, 2015. 退化梯度上高山草甸植物群落功能多样性研究[D]. 昆明: 云南大学: 1-68.
	SHENG Z L, 2015. Functional diversity of alpine meadow plant communities on a degradation gradient[D]. Kunming: Yunnan University: 1-68.
[31]	田平, 程小琴, 韩海荣, 等, 2017. 环境因子对山西太岳山典型森林类型物种多样性及其功能多样性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 37(5): 992-1003.
	TIAN P, CHENG X Q, HAN H R, et al., 2017. Plant functional traits and diversities of different communities in broadleaved Korean pine forests in the Changbai Mountain[J]. Northwest Journal of Botany, 37(5): 992-1003.
[32]	王长庭, 龙瑞军, 丁路明, 等, 2005. 草地生态系统中物种多样性、群落稳定性和生态系统功能的关系[J]. 草业科学, 22(5): 1-7.
	WANG C T, LONG R J, DING L M, et al., 2005. The relationship between species diversity, community stability and ecosystem functioning in grassland ecosystems[J]. Pratacultural Science, 22(5): 1-7.
[33]	王俊丽, 2021. 西南喀斯特森林植物多样性和功能性状的纬度格局研究[D]. 南宁: 南宁师范大学: 1-103.
	WANG J L, 2021. Study on the latitudinal pattern of plant diversity and functional traits in the karst forests of Southwest China[D]. Nanning: Nanning Normal University: 1-103.
[34]	魏识广, 叶万辉, 练琚愉, 等, 2022. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林群落及其卫星样地物种多样性特征[J]. 生态学报, 42(11): 4515-4523.
	WEI S G, YE W H, LIAN J Y, et al., 2022. Species diversity characteristics of lower subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest community and its satellite plots[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(11): 4515-4523.
[35]	吴昊, 肖楠楠, 林婷婷, 2020. 秦岭松栎林功能多样性与物种多样性和环境异质性的耦合关系[J]. 生态环境学报, 29(6): 1090-1100. DOI
	WU H, XIAO N N, LIN T T, 2020. Relationships between functional diversity and species diversity of pine-oak mixed forest in Qinling Mountains and their environmental explanations[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 29(6): 1090-1100.
[36]	王铸豪, 何道泉, 宋绍敦, 等, 1982. 鼎湖山自然保护区的植被[J]. 热带亚热带森林生态系统研究 (1): 77-141.
	WANG Z H, HE D Q, SONG S D, et al., 1982. The vegetation of Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve[J]. Tropical and Subtropical Forest Ecosystem (1): 77-141.
[37]	许格希, 史作民, 唐敬超, 等, 2016. 海南尖峰岭热带山地雨林林冠层树种功能多样性特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 27(11): 3444-3454.
	XU G X, SHI Z M, TANG J C, et al., 2016. Functional diversity characteristics of canopy tree species of Jianfengling tropical montane rainforest on Hainan Island, China[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 27(11): 3444-3454.
[38]	薛倩妮, 闫明, 毕润成, 2015. 山西五鹿山森林群落木本植物功能多样性[J]. 生态学报, 35(21): 7023-7032.
	KUE Q N, YAN M, BI R C, 2015. Functional diversity research of tree and shrub layers in forest communities of the Wulu Mountains Nature Reserve in Shanxi, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(21): 7023-7032.
[39]	张金屯, 范丽宏, 2011. 物种功能多样性及其研究方法[J]. 山地学报, 29(5): 513-519.
	ZHANG J T, FAN L H, 2011. Functional diversity of species and its research methods[J]. Journal of Mountain Geology, 29(5): 513-519.
[40]	赵小娜, 秦浩, 张峰, 2017. 山西文峪河上中游森林群落多样性[J]. 生态学报, 37(4): 1093-1102.
	ZHAO X N, QIN H, ZHANG F, 2017. Diversity of forest communities in the upstream and middle reaches of the Wenyu River watershed, Shanxi[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(4): 1093-1102.
[41]	朱云云, 王孝安, 王贤, 等, 2016. 坡向因子对黄土高原草地群落功能多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 36(21): 6823-6833.
	ZHU Y Y, WANG X A, WANG X, et al., 2016. Effect of slope aspect on the functional diversity of grass communities in the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(21): 6823-6833.

鼎湖山不同类型森林物种多样性和功能多样性研究

Studies on Species Diversity and Functional Diversity of Different Types of Forests in Dinghu Mountains

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 41

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐茂宏. 暖温带森林土壤微生物α多样性海拔梯度格局及其影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(5): 678-687.
[2]	邓鹏飞, 肖永有, 曾常金, 高雨, 张秀兰, 陈兴彬, 肖复明, 徐小牛. 长期弃管杉木人工林群落结构及其物种多样性特点[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(4): 511-520.
[3]	王梓晗, 吕世杰, 王忠武, 刘红梅. 放牧强度对优势种群重要值和物种多样性及其二者典型关系的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(6): 869-876.
[4]	关玉亮, 甘先华, 殷祚云, 黄钰辉, 陶玉柱, 李宽, 张卫强, 邓彩琼, 曾祥尧, 黄芳芳. 南岭自然保护区不同海拔梯度植物多样性分布格局[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(6): 877-887.
[5]	卿彩霞, 陈圣宾, 邓杰文, 邓惺位, 李喆, 邱鹭. 生境数量和生境质量以及气象因子对成都市粪食性金龟物种多样性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(5): 708-719.
[6]	卫玺玺, 晁鑫艳, 郑景明, 唐可欣, 万龙, 周金星. 贺兰山东、西侧典型植物群落物种多样性差异及其影响因子[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(4): 520-530.
[7]	崔盼盼, 于洋, 曲波, 苏芳莉. 封育对退化河岸草地植物多样性和植被景观的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(11): 1708-1716.
[8]	宋思梦, 林冬梅, 周恒宇, 罗宗志, 张丽丽, 易超, 林辉, 林兴生, 刘斌, 苏德伟, 郑丹, 余世葵, 林占熺. 种植巨菌草对乌兰布和沙漠植物物种多样性与土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(9): 1595-1605.
[9]	赵蔓, 张晓曼, 杨明洁. 林火干扰对栓皮栎-辽东栎混交林植物多样性与土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(10): 1732-1740.
[10]	秦佳琪, 肖指柔, 明安刚, 朱豪, 滕金倩, 梁泽丽, 陶怡, 覃林. 针阔人工混交林及其纯林对土壤微生物碳循环功能基因丰度的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(10): 1719-1731.
[11]	张立进, 杜虎, 曾馥平, 黄国勤, 宋敏, 宋同清. 喀斯特峰丛洼地植被恢复过程中生产力与多样性关系探讨[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(1): 26-35.
[12]	陈瑶, 李云红, 邵英男, 刘玉龙, 刘延坤. 阔叶红松林物种多样性与土壤理化特征研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 679-687.
[13]	冯凌, 喻理飞, 王阳, 张丽敏, 赵庆, 李方兵. 喀斯特地区植被不同恢复阶段功能冗余和功能多样性对群落稳定性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 670-678.
[14]	温智峰, 魏识广, 李林, 叶万辉, 练琚愉. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林植物不同分类水平上的空间分布格局及空间关联[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(3): 440-450.
[15]	王玄, 熊鑫, 张慧玲, 赵梦頔, 胡明慧, 褚国伟, 孟泽, 张德强. 模拟酸雨对南亚热带森林凋落物分解和土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(9): 1805-1813.