Pattern and Influencing Factors of Forest Soil Microbial Communities in Different Climate Types in China

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.08.001

Ecology and Environment ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 1355-1364.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.08.001

• Research Article [Ecology] • Next Articles

Pattern and Influencing Factors of Forest Soil Microbial Communities in Different Climate Types in China

JIANG Yishan¹^,²(), SUN Yingtao², ZHANG Gan², LUO Chunling²^,^*()

1. Academy of Green Manufacturing Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, P. R. China
2. Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China

Received:2023-07-20 Online:2023-08-18 Published:2023-11-08
Contact: LUO Chunling

中国不同气候类型森林土壤微生物群落结构及其影响因素

姜懿珊¹^,²(), 孙迎韬², 张干², 罗春玲²^,^*()

1.武汉科技大学绿色制造工程研究院，湖北武汉 4880011
2.中国科学院广州地球化学研究所/有机地球化学国家重点实验室，广东广州 510640

通讯作者: 罗春玲
作者简介:姜懿珊（1990年生），女，助理研究员，博士，从事土壤元素循环、污染控制及类土壤转化机制研究。E-mail: jiangyishan@wust.edu.cn
基金资助:
有机地球化学国家重点实验室开放基金项目(SKLOG202106)

Abstract

Abstract:

Forest soil microorganisms determine the energy flow and material cycle of forest ecosystems, and their community structure and influencing factors are significant to maintain ecosystem stability and respond to global climate change. Phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) can be used as biomarkers to directly reflect the biomass and community structure of different microbial communities in soil because they only exist in living microorganisms. This study focuses on soil microorganisms and uses the PLFA method to analyze the community structure, biomass, and physicochemical properties of microorganisms in natural forest soils from all six climate types in China. The main factors affecting the microbial community structure were analyzed using correlation analysis and redundancy analysis methods. The analysis results indicate that there are significant differences in soil density, soil pH, soil litter carbon content, soil organic carbon content, soil total nitrogen content, soil carbon nitrogen ratio, and soil total phosphorus content among the six climate types. There are significant differences in fungal community biomass among the six climate types, with a trend of first increasing and then decreasing as the climate types change from cold zone to temperate zone to tropical zone. The ratio of fungi to bacteria in warm temperate soil is the highest (0.7), significantly higher than that in subtropical and tropical soils (0.4-0.5). The ratio of Gram positive to negative bacteria in tropical and alpine soils is significantly higher than that in other climate types (1.3-1.5), with the lowest in subtropical soils (0.7). The climate (annual average temperature, annual precipitation) and soil physicochemical properties (soil pH, soil density, soil total nitrogen content and soil organic carbon content) are significantly correlated with the soil microbial biomass and community structure represented by PLFAs content (P<0.01). This study summarizes that there is no significant difference in the overall microbial biomass represented by total PLFAs among six climate types, but there are significant differences in soil physicochemical properties and microbial community structure. The main influencing factors of forest soil microbial community structure are annual mean temperature, annual mean precipitation and soil pH value. This study reveals the characteristics of forest soil microbial communities in China as a whole, and providing a basis for us to reveal the response of soil microbial communities to climate change in space.

Key words: forest soil, microbial structure, microbial biomass, climate types

摘要：

森林土壤微生物决定了森林生态系统的能量流动和物质循环，研究其群落结构和影响因素对于维持生态系统稳定性和应对全球气候变化具有重要意义。磷脂脂肪酸（PLFAs）因其仅在活体微生物中存在的特性，可以作为生物标志物直观反映土壤中不同种类微生物群落的生物量和群落结构。以土壤微生物为对象，采用PLFA方法，分析了中国全部6种气候类型中天然森林土壤中微生物的群落结构、生物量和理化性质，并采用相关分析和冗余分析方法分析了影响微生物群落结构的主要因素。结果表明，6种气候类型中，土壤容重、土壤pH、土壤凋落物碳质量分数、土壤有机碳质量分数、土壤总氮质量分数、土壤碳氮比和土壤总磷质量分数存在显著差异。真菌群落生物量在6种气候类型中存在显著差异，随气候类型从寒带-温带-热带变化中呈现先升后降的趋势。暖温带土壤真菌与细菌比值最高（0.7），显著高于亚热带、热带土壤（0.4－0.5）。热带土壤和高原土壤的革兰氏阳性与阴性菌比显著高于其他气候类型（1.3－1.5），亚热带土壤最低（0.7）。气候（年均温、年降水量）和土壤理化性质（土壤pH、土壤容重、土壤总氮质量分数和土壤有机碳质量分数）与PLFAs质量分数所代表的土壤微生物生物量和群落结构呈现显著相关关系（P<0.01）。综上，在中国6种气候类型中，森林土壤中总PLFAs所代表的生物量差异不大，但土壤的理化性质和微生物群落结构差异显著。森林土壤微生物群落结构最主要影响因素是年均温、年降水量和土壤pH值。

关键词: 森林土壤, 微生物群落结构, 微生物生物量, 气候类型

CLC Number:

JIANG Yishan, SUN Yingtao, ZHANG Gan, LUO Chunling. Pattern and Influencing Factors of Forest Soil Microbial Communities in Different Climate Types in China[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(8): 1355-1364.

姜懿珊, 孙迎韬, 张干, 罗春玲. 中国不同气候类型森林土壤微生物群落结构及其影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(8): 1355-1364.

Figures/Tables 6

References 37

[1]	ALLEN S E, 1974. Chemical analysis of ecological materials[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 13(2): 650. DOI URL
[2]	Bligh E G, Dyer W J A, 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification[J]. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology, 37(8): 911-917. DOI PMID
[3]	CAMPBELL C, 2010. Soil microbiology, ecology, and biochemistry[M]. Edited by PAUL E A. European Journal of Soil Science 59(5): 1008-1009.
[4]	FROSTEGÅRD Å., BÅÅTH E, 1996. The use of phospholipid fatty acid analysis to estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 22(1-2): 59-65. DOI URL
[5]	JUMPPONEN A, MYROLD D D, 2014. Microbial community and functional responses to rainfall manipulations in a prairie soil[J]. Genomic Science Contractor-Grantee Meeting XII, 56: 98.
[6]	LECHEVALIER M P, MOSS C W, 1976. Lipids in bacterial taxonomy - a taxonomist’s view, critical reviews in microbiology, informa healthcare[J]. CRC Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 5(2): 109. DOI URL
[7]	LEWE N, HERMANS S, LEAR G et al., 2021. Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis as a tool to estimate absolute abundances from compositional 16S rRNA bacterial metabarcoding data[J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 188(1): 106271. DOI URL
[8]	LIANG Y T, JIANG Y J, WANG F et al., 2015. Long-term soil transplant simulating climate change with latitude significantly alters microbial temporal turnover[J]. The ISME Journal, 9(12): 2561-2572. DOI
[9]	LIU S, WANG F, XUE K et al., 2014. The interactive effects of soil transplant into colder regions and cropping on soil microbiology and biogeochemistry[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 17(3): 566-576. DOI URL
[10]	LIU X, WANG S, JIANG Y S, et al., 2017. Polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated diphenylethers in soils from planted forests and adjacent natural forests on a tropical island[J]. Environmental Pollution, 227(8): 57-63. DOI URL
[11]	WHITE D, DAVIS W, NICKELS J et al., 1979. Determination of the sedimentary microbial biomass by extractible lipid phosphate[J]. Oecologia, 40(1): 51-62. DOI PMID
[12]	WANG G H, JIN J, TU M N et al., 2006. Effects of plant, soil and soil management on soil microbial community diversity[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 25(5): 550-556.
[13]	ZHAO M X, XUE K, WANG F et al., 2014. Microbial mediation of biogeochemical cycles revealed by simulation of global changes with soil transplant and cropping[J]. The ISME Journal, 8(10): 2045-2055. DOI
[14]	白晓旭, 史荣久, 尤业明, 等, 2015. 河南宝天曼不同林龄与林型森林土壤的细菌群落结构与多样性[J]. 应用生态学报, 26(8): 2273-2281.
	BAI X X, SHI R J, YOU Y M, et al., 2015. Bacterial community structure and diversity in soils of different forest ages and types in Baotianman forest, Henan Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 26(8): 2273-2281.
[15]	毕明丽, 宇万太, 姜子绍, 等, 2010. 利用PLFA方法研究不同土地利用方式对潮棕壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 43(9): 1834-1842.
	BI M L, YU W T, JIANG Z S, et al., 2010. Study on the effects of different land use patterns on microbial community structure in aquic brown soil by utilizing PLFA method[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 43(9): 1834-1842.
[16]	曹永昌, 谭向平, 和文祥, 等, 2016. 秦岭地区不同林分土壤微生物群落代谢特征[J]. 生态学报, 36(10): 2978-2986.
	CAO Y C, TAN X P, HE W X, et al., 2016. The metabolism characteristics of microbial community in different forest soil in Qinling Mountains Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(10): 2978-2986.
[17]	陈庆强, 沈承德, 孙彦敏, 等, 2005. 鼎湖山土壤有机质深度分布的剖面演化机制[J]. 土壤学报, 42(1): 1-8.
	CHEN Q Q, SHEN C D, SUN Y M, et al., 2005. Mechanism of distribution of soil organic matter with depth due to evolution of soil profiles at the Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 42(1): 1-8.
[18]	丁爽, 魏圣钊, 陈真亮, 等, 2023. 中国西南典型森林土壤微生物在不同土壤深度下的变化特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 34(3): 614-622. DOI
	DING S, WEI S Z, CHEN Z L, et al., 2023. Variation characteristics of microorganisms at different soil depths of typical forests in southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied ecology, 34(3): 614-622. DOI
[19]	高秀宏, 李敏, 卢萍, 等, 2019. 呼和浩特市大青山白桦根际土壤细菌群落结构研究[J]. 生态学报, 39(10): 3586-3596.
	GAO X H, LI M, LU P, et al., 2019. Bacterial community in the rhizosphere soil of Betula platyphylla in the Daqing Mountains, Hohhot[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(10): 3586-3596.
[20]	谷晓楠, 贺红士, 陶岩, 等, 2017. 长白山土壤微生物群落结构及酶活性随海拔的分布特征与影响因子[J]. 生态学报, 37(24): 8374-8384.
	GU X N, HE H S, TAO Y, et al., 2017. Soil microbial community structure, enzyme activities, and their influencing factors along different altitudes of Changbai Mountain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(24):8374-8384.
[21]	姜雪薇, 马大龙, 臧淑英, 等, 2021. 高通量测序分析大兴安岭典型森林土壤细菌和真菌群落特征[J]. 微生物学通报, 48(4): 1093-1105.
	JIANG X W, MA D L, ZANG S Y, et al., 2021. Characteristics of soil bacterial and fungal community of typical forest in the Greater Khingan Mountains based on high-throughput sequencing[J]. Microbiology China, 48(4): 1093-1105.
[22]	李洪杰, 刘军伟, 杨林, 等, 2016. 海拔梯度模拟气候变暖对高山森林土壤微生物生物量碳氮磷的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 22(4): 599-605.
	LI H J, LIU J W, YANG L, et al., 2016. Effects of simulated climate warming on soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus of alpine forest[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 22(4): 599-605.
[23]	李雪, 万晓华, 周富伟, 等, 2020. 南亚热带6种人工林土壤微生物生物量和群落结构特征[J]. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 15(1): 33-40.
	LI X, WAM X H, ZHOU F W, et al., 2020. Characteristics of soil microbial biomass and community structure under six different tree species plantations in southern subtropical of China[J]. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 15(1): 33-40.
[24]	乔沙沙, 周永娜, 柴宝峰, 等, 2017. 关帝山森林土壤真菌群落结构与遗传多样性特征[J]. 环境科学, 38(6): 2502-2512.
	QIAO S S, ZHOU Y N, CHAI B F, et al., 2017. Characteristics of fungi community structure and genetic diversity of forests in Guandi Mountains[J]. Environmental Science, 38(6): 2502-2512.
[25]	谭红妍, 闫瑞瑞, 闫玉春, 等, 2015. 不同放牧强度下温性草甸草原土壤微生物群落结构PLFAs分析[J]. 草业学报, 24(3): 115-121. DOI
	TAN H Y, YAN R R, YAN Y C, et al., 2015. Phospholipid fatty acid analysis of soil microbial communities under different grazing intensities in meadow steppe[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 30(6): 1126-1134.
[26]	王卫霞, 史作民, 罗达, 等, 2013. 南亚热带3种人工林土壤微生物生物量和微生物群落结构特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 24(7): 1784-1792.
	WANG W X, SHI Z M, LUO D, et al., 2013. Characteristics of soil microbial biomass and community composition in three types of plantations in southern subtropical area of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(7): 1784-1792.
[27]	韦应莉, 曹文侠, 李建宏, 等, 2018. 不同放牧与围封高寒灌丛草地土壤微生物群落结构PLFA分析[J]. 生态学报, 38(13): 4897-4908.
	WEI Y L, CAO W X, LI J H, et al., 2018. Phospholipidfatty acid (PLFA) Analysis of soil microbial community structure with different intensities of grazing and fencing in alpine shrubland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(13): 4897-4908.
[28]	吴则焰, 林文雄, 陈志芳, 等, 2014. 武夷山不同海拔植被带上土壤微生物PLFA分析[J]. 林业科学, 50(7): 105-112.
	WU Z Y, LIN W X, CHEN Z F, et al., 2014. Phospholipid fatty acid analysis of soil microbes at different elevation of Wuyi Mountains[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 50(7): 105-112.
[29]	徐文煦, 王继华, 张雪萍, 2009. 我国森林土壤微生物生态学研究现状及展望[J]. 哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报, 25(3): 96-100.
	XU W X, WANG J H, ZHANG X P, 2009. Research progress on microbial ecology of forest in China[J]. Natural Science Journal of Harbin Normal University, 25(3): 96-100.
[30]	徐德英, 孙良杰, 王阳, 等, 2020. 土壤微生物群落对玉米根茬和茎叶残体碳的利用特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 40(10): 4504-4513.
	XU D Y, SUN L J, WANG Y, et al., 2020. Characteristics of microbial utilization of maize root-and straw derived carbon[J]. China Environmental Science, 40(10): 4504-4513.
[31]	杨立宾, 朱道光, 崔福星, 等, 2017. 寒温带兴安落叶松林不同林型土壤微生物群落特征[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 45(9): 66-72.
	YANG L B, ZHU D G, CUI F X, et al., 2017. Soil microbial community characteristics of the different forest types of larix gmelini forest in cold temperate zone[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 45(9): 66-72.
[32]	张秋芳, 刘波, 林营志, 等, 2009. 土壤微生物群落磷脂脂肪酸PLFA生物标记多样性[J]. 生态学报, 29(8): 4127-4137.
	ZHANG Q F, LIU B, LIN Y Z, et al., 2009. The Diversity of Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) Biomarker for the Microbial Community in soil[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(8): 4127-4137.
[33]	张瑞娟, 李华, 林勤保, 等, 2011. 土壤微生物群落表征中磷脂脂肪酸 (PLFA) 方法研究进展[J]. 山西农业科学, 39(9): 1020-1024.
	ZHANG R J, LI H, LIN Q B, et al., 2011. Research progress of PLFA method in the soil microbial community[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 39(9): 1020-1024.
[34]	赵帅, 张静妮, 赖欣, 等, 2011. 放牧与围栏内蒙古针茅草原土壤微生物生物量碳、氮变化及微生物群落结构PLFA分析[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 30(6): 1126-1134.
	ZHAO S, ZHANG J N, LAI X, et al., 2011. Analysis of microbial biomass C, N and soil microbial community structure of stipa steppes Using PLFA at grazing and fenced in Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 30(6): 1126-1134.
[35]	赵雯, 王丹丹, 热依拉木民, 等, 2023. 阿尔山地区兴安落叶松林土壤微生物群落结构[J]. 生物多样性, 31(2): 151-162.
	ZHAO W, WANG D D, MUMIN R Y Z, et al., 2023. Soil microbial community structure of Larix gmelinii forest in the Aershan area[J]. Biodiversity Science, 31(2): 151-162.
[36]	朱平, 陈仁升, 宋耀选, 等, 2015. 祁连山不同植被类型土壤微生物群落多样性差异[J]. 草业学报, 24(6): 75-84. DOI
	ZHU P, CHEN R R, SONG Y X, et al., 2015. Soil microbial community diversity under four vegetation types in the Qilian Mountains, China[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 24(6): 75-84. DOI
[37]	朱万泽, 马胜兰, 王文武, 等, 2023. 土壤微生物碳利用效率研究进展[J]. 山地学报, 41(1): 1-18.
	ZHU W Z, MA S L, WANG W W, et al., 2023. Research advances in soil microbial carbon use efficiency[J]. Mountain Research, 41(1): 1-18.

气候森林类型	采样区	经纬度	采样点数量	海拔高度范围/m	年降雨量范围/mm	年均温范围/℃
寒温带针叶林	大兴安岭DX	123.5143°E, 49.5409W	8	445‒1370	371‒549	-3.6‒ -1.3
温带针阔混交林	小兴安岭XX	129.6451E, 47.4468W	9	240‒1420	619‒693	1.1‒2.8
	长白山CB	128.1301E, 42.1402W	4	1250‒2000	941‒950	5.1‒5.1
	赛罕乌拉HS	118.7067E, 44.1911W	3	1170‒1400	509‒509	4.0‒4.0
	塞罕坝SH	117.2924E, 42.4682W	4	1560‒1870	530‒541	4.0‒4.5
	白草洼BC	117.6061E, 40.8154W	4	1120‒1710	656‒664	8.5‒8.6
暖温带落叶阔叶林	五岳寨WY	113.8379E, 38.7197W	4	1430‒1880	525‒525	11.1‒11.1
	关帝山GD	111.4423E, 37.8880W	3	1310‒2200	469‒469	9.7‒9.7
	秦岭QL	107.8002E, 34.0171W	6	870‒2350	674‒696	13.4‒13.7
	青峰山QF	107.4418E, 34.0009W	3	1530‒2100	699‒706	13.5‒13.6
	鳌山AS	107.4666E, 33.8583W	4	1260‒1720	728‒731	13.8‒13.9
亚热带常绿阔叶林	神农架SN	110.5480E, 31.7582W	4	1210‒3090	1005‒1127	15.9‒16.0
	天目山TM	119.7071E, 30.5828W	4	540‒1460	1692‒1774	16.9‒17.0
	梵净山FJ	108.7021E, 27.9072W	3	1482‒2095	1500‒1501	15.2‒15.2
	武功山WG	114.1627E, 27.4649W	3	778‒1115	2067‒2068	18.2‒18.2
	雷公山LG	108.1994E, 26.3806W	4	1223‒1844	1555‒1558	16.3‒16.3
	南岭NL	113.0148E, 24.9141W	4	1160‒1520	2080‒2082	19.4‒19.5
	井冈山JG	114.1635E, 26.4999W	5	925‒1350	2079‒2084	18.6‒18.7
	哀牢山AL	101.0328E, 24.5333W	5	2190‒2655	985‒991	17.7‒17.7
	戴云山DY	118.2217E, 25.6431W	5	1100‒1510	2010‒2012	20.3‒20.3
	鼎湖山DH	112.5386E, 23.1684W	3	210‒586	2073‒2073	21.5‒21.5
	十万大山SW	107.9145E, 21.8843W	5	393‒708	1819‒1824	22.7‒22.8
热带雨林	西双版纳BN	101.2854E, 21.9072W	2	652‒805	97.08‒97.08	22.98‒22.98
	尖峰岭JF	108.8900E, 18.7297W	1	873‒873	76.83‒76.83	25.08‒25.08
	霸王岭BW	108.8067E, 18.6999W	2	1101‒1148	76.08‒76.83	25.08‒25.08
	海南岛HN	109.6399E, 19.4486W	2	143‒143	1815‒1815	23.5‒23.5
高原山地森林	贡嘎山GG	102.0709E, 29.6033W	4	2300‒2700	1353‒1613	7.6‒10.1

气候森林类型	采样区	经纬度	采样点数量	海拔高度范围/m	年降雨量范围/mm	年均温范围/℃
寒温带针叶林	大兴安岭DX	123.5143°E, 49.5409W	8	445‒1370	371‒549	-3.6‒ -1.3
温带针阔混交林	小兴安岭XX	129.6451E, 47.4468W	9	240‒1420	619‒693	1.1‒2.8
	长白山CB	128.1301E, 42.1402W	4	1250‒2000	941‒950	5.1‒5.1
	赛罕乌拉HS	118.7067E, 44.1911W	3	1170‒1400	509‒509	4.0‒4.0
	塞罕坝SH	117.2924E, 42.4682W	4	1560‒1870	530‒541	4.0‒4.5
	白草洼BC	117.6061E, 40.8154W	4	1120‒1710	656‒664	8.5‒8.6
暖温带落叶阔叶林	五岳寨WY	113.8379E, 38.7197W	4	1430‒1880	525‒525	11.1‒11.1
	关帝山GD	111.4423E, 37.8880W	3	1310‒2200	469‒469	9.7‒9.7
	秦岭QL	107.8002E, 34.0171W	6	870‒2350	674‒696	13.4‒13.7
	青峰山QF	107.4418E, 34.0009W	3	1530‒2100	699‒706	13.5‒13.6
	鳌山AS	107.4666E, 33.8583W	4	1260‒1720	728‒731	13.8‒13.9
亚热带常绿阔叶林	神农架SN	110.5480E, 31.7582W	4	1210‒3090	1005‒1127	15.9‒16.0
	天目山TM	119.7071E, 30.5828W	4	540‒1460	1692‒1774	16.9‒17.0
	梵净山FJ	108.7021E, 27.9072W	3	1482‒2095	1500‒1501	15.2‒15.2
	武功山WG	114.1627E, 27.4649W	3	778‒1115	2067‒2068	18.2‒18.2
	雷公山LG	108.1994E, 26.3806W	4	1223‒1844	1555‒1558	16.3‒16.3
	南岭NL	113.0148E, 24.9141W	4	1160‒1520	2080‒2082	19.4‒19.5
	井冈山JG	114.1635E, 26.4999W	5	925‒1350	2079‒2084	18.6‒18.7
	哀牢山AL	101.0328E, 24.5333W	5	2190‒2655	985‒991	17.7‒17.7
	戴云山DY	118.2217E, 25.6431W	5	1100‒1510	2010‒2012	20.3‒20.3
	鼎湖山DH	112.5386E, 23.1684W	3	210‒586	2073‒2073	21.5‒21.5
	十万大山SW	107.9145E, 21.8843W	5	393‒708	1819‒1824	22.7‒22.8
热带雨林	西双版纳BN	101.2854E, 21.9072W	2	652‒805	97.08‒97.08	22.98‒22.98
	尖峰岭JF	108.8900E, 18.7297W	1	873‒873	76.83‒76.83	25.08‒25.08
	霸王岭BW	108.8067E, 18.6999W	2	1101‒1148	76.08‒76.83	25.08‒25.08
	海南岛HN	109.6399E, 19.4486W	2	143‒143	1815‒1815	23.5‒23.5
高原山地森林	贡嘎山GG	102.0709E, 29.6033W	4	2300‒2700	1353‒1613	7.6‒10.1

气候类型		土壤容重/ (g∙cm^-3)	pH	凋落物碳质量分数/%	有机碳质量分数/%	总氮质量分数/%	碳氮比	总磷质量分数/‰	真菌与细菌比	革兰氏阳性与阴性菌比
寒温带	DX	0.42±0.17 ¹⁾	5.03±0.78	36.31±6.00	17.32±8.96	0.71±0.37	32.07±24.65	2.97±3.96	0.65±0.33	0.81±0.35
温带	BC	0.48±0.16	5.53±0.73	35.12±1.43	10.95±4.49	0.91±0.28	11.66±2.18	1.07±0.12	0.64±0.11	0.58±0.16
	CB	0.21±0.03 ²⁾	4.83±0.40	26.62±5.36	6.70±1.75	0.49±0.14	13.77±0.70	1.00±0.15	0.64±0.20	0.97±0.50
	HS	0.46±0.19	6.01±0.50	30.62±7.36	6.30±2.23	0.45±0.23	14.74±2.37	0.61±0.27	0.67±0.10	0.71±0.26
	SH	0.43±0.13	6.39±0.38	28.62±5.61	10.83±4.86	0.69±0.34	16.49±2.08	0.82±0.31	0.70±0.12	0.59±0.18
	XX	0.42±0.10	5.60±0.45	34.74±5.00	13.85±4.85	0.94±0.34	14.87±1.58	1.39±0.39	0.48±0.05	1.30±0.20
暖温带	AS	0.32±0.09	5.19±0.86	35.48±4.86	20.36±11.25	1.09±0.38	17.81±3.88	1.00±0.23	0.74±0.11	0.56±0.06
	GD	0.31±0.06	5.96±0.61	36.59±2.36	11.14±1.01	0.58±0.01	19.32±1.57	0.93±0.01	0.56±0.06	1.13±0.20
	QF	0.37±0.02	5.95±0.26	36.91±1.96	10.94±3.18	0.81±0.40	15.26±5.79	1.19±0.36	0.70±0.18	1.19±0.46
	QL	0.37±0.05	6.42±0.65	35.09±3.21	13.75±4.13	1.00±0.25	13.74±1.39	1.47±0.41	0.77±0.14	0.62±0.16
	WY	0.42±0.22	5.24±1.06	28.33±8.18	5.26±1.00	0.34±0.10	15.62±1.60	0.81±0.23	0.61±0.07	0.98±0.64
亚热带	AL	0.53±0.09	4.45±0.68	46.18±1.27	14.33±5.75	0.96±0.35	14.95±3.44	1.12±0.46	0.55±0.09	0.61±0.20
	DH	0.81±0.15	3.78±0.18		4.51±1.04	0.21±0.11	25.29±11.48	0.33±0.03	0.48±0.17	0.69±0.23
	DY	0.42±0.14	3.79±0.37	48.04±1.92	9.59±3.42	0.52±0.19	18.47±2.27	0.41±0.09	0.51±0.07	0.56±0.14
	FJ	0.30±0.09	4.30±0.38	43.70±6.25	18.06±5.68	1.25±0.37	14.46±0.48	1.28±0.55	0.33±0.10	1.11±0.45
	JG	0.51±0.20	4.85±2.00	46.25±1.92	9.22±4.38	0.37±0.25	31.97±13.88	0.46±0.15	0.45±0.07	0.61±0.17
	LG	0.66±0.13	4.13±0.76	39.36±4.63	13.78±2.56	0.92±0.23	15.18±1.69	0.89±0.28	0.46±0.10	0.51±0.14
	NL	0.64±0.17	4.28±0.13	38.48±4.49	5.42±1.38	0.50±0.10	11.06±3.14	0.28±0.08	0.63±0.29	0.53±0.17
	SN	0.33±0.04	5.32±0.69	39.00±3.82	16.73±12.42	1.05±0.62	14.67±3.22	1.38±0.55	0.80±0.18	0.50±0.10
	SW	0.77±0.12	3.80±0.25	33.81±13.80	5.01±1.51	0.33±0.11	19.93±17.53	0.24±0.05	0.27±0.11	1.01±0.24
	TM	0.62±0.23	4.56±0.39		7.21±4.17	0.52±0.32	14.12±1.22	0.93±0.47	0.46±0.17	0.89±0.59
	WG	0.72±0.17	4.37±0.16	26.83±8.40	3.66±1.10	0.27±0.08	13.35±1.44	0.71±0.20	0.41±0.07	1.08±0.73
热带	BN	1.22±0.02	5.91±0.84	31.14±3.58	2.39±1.56	0.32±0.20	7.42±0.33	10.48±9.77	0.32±0.08	1.94±0.26
	BW	1.17±0.15	4.89±0.11	35.00±5.65	2.38±0.52	0.23±0.02	10.15±1.56	2.85±0.57	0.49±0.08	1.51±0.03
	HN	1.24±0.05	4.66±0.33	‒	2.01±0.45	0.31±0.07	6.55±0.05	0.26±0.06	0.44±0.03	1.26±0.39
	JF	1.32±0	5.65±0	39.00±0	1.53±0	0.17±0	8.90±0	1.52±0	0.51±0	1.18±0
高原	GG	1.03±0.30	4.49±0.97	34.14±13.60	5.87±3.66	0.42±0.18	13.13±3.78	8.31±2.87	0.49±0.12	1.34±0.28

气候类型		土壤容重/ (g∙cm^-3)	pH	凋落物碳质量分数/%	有机碳质量分数/%	总氮质量分数/%	碳氮比	总磷质量分数/‰	真菌与细菌比	革兰氏阳性与阴性菌比
寒温带	DX	0.42±0.17 ¹⁾	5.03±0.78	36.31±6.00	17.32±8.96	0.71±0.37	32.07±24.65	2.97±3.96	0.65±0.33	0.81±0.35
温带	BC	0.48±0.16	5.53±0.73	35.12±1.43	10.95±4.49	0.91±0.28	11.66±2.18	1.07±0.12	0.64±0.11	0.58±0.16
	CB	0.21±0.03 ²⁾	4.83±0.40	26.62±5.36	6.70±1.75	0.49±0.14	13.77±0.70	1.00±0.15	0.64±0.20	0.97±0.50
	HS	0.46±0.19	6.01±0.50	30.62±7.36	6.30±2.23	0.45±0.23	14.74±2.37	0.61±0.27	0.67±0.10	0.71±0.26
	SH	0.43±0.13	6.39±0.38	28.62±5.61	10.83±4.86	0.69±0.34	16.49±2.08	0.82±0.31	0.70±0.12	0.59±0.18
	XX	0.42±0.10	5.60±0.45	34.74±5.00	13.85±4.85	0.94±0.34	14.87±1.58	1.39±0.39	0.48±0.05	1.30±0.20
暖温带	AS	0.32±0.09	5.19±0.86	35.48±4.86	20.36±11.25	1.09±0.38	17.81±3.88	1.00±0.23	0.74±0.11	0.56±0.06
	GD	0.31±0.06	5.96±0.61	36.59±2.36	11.14±1.01	0.58±0.01	19.32±1.57	0.93±0.01	0.56±0.06	1.13±0.20
	QF	0.37±0.02	5.95±0.26	36.91±1.96	10.94±3.18	0.81±0.40	15.26±5.79	1.19±0.36	0.70±0.18	1.19±0.46
	QL	0.37±0.05	6.42±0.65	35.09±3.21	13.75±4.13	1.00±0.25	13.74±1.39	1.47±0.41	0.77±0.14	0.62±0.16
	WY	0.42±0.22	5.24±1.06	28.33±8.18	5.26±1.00	0.34±0.10	15.62±1.60	0.81±0.23	0.61±0.07	0.98±0.64
亚热带	AL	0.53±0.09	4.45±0.68	46.18±1.27	14.33±5.75	0.96±0.35	14.95±3.44	1.12±0.46	0.55±0.09	0.61±0.20
	DH	0.81±0.15	3.78±0.18		4.51±1.04	0.21±0.11	25.29±11.48	0.33±0.03	0.48±0.17	0.69±0.23
	DY	0.42±0.14	3.79±0.37	48.04±1.92	9.59±3.42	0.52±0.19	18.47±2.27	0.41±0.09	0.51±0.07	0.56±0.14
	FJ	0.30±0.09	4.30±0.38	43.70±6.25	18.06±5.68	1.25±0.37	14.46±0.48	1.28±0.55	0.33±0.10	1.11±0.45
	JG	0.51±0.20	4.85±2.00	46.25±1.92	9.22±4.38	0.37±0.25	31.97±13.88	0.46±0.15	0.45±0.07	0.61±0.17
	LG	0.66±0.13	4.13±0.76	39.36±4.63	13.78±2.56	0.92±0.23	15.18±1.69	0.89±0.28	0.46±0.10	0.51±0.14
	NL	0.64±0.17	4.28±0.13	38.48±4.49	5.42±1.38	0.50±0.10	11.06±3.14	0.28±0.08	0.63±0.29	0.53±0.17
	SN	0.33±0.04	5.32±0.69	39.00±3.82	16.73±12.42	1.05±0.62	14.67±3.22	1.38±0.55	0.80±0.18	0.50±0.10
	SW	0.77±0.12	3.80±0.25	33.81±13.80	5.01±1.51	0.33±0.11	19.93±17.53	0.24±0.05	0.27±0.11	1.01±0.24
	TM	0.62±0.23	4.56±0.39		7.21±4.17	0.52±0.32	14.12±1.22	0.93±0.47	0.46±0.17	0.89±0.59
	WG	0.72±0.17	4.37±0.16	26.83±8.40	3.66±1.10	0.27±0.08	13.35±1.44	0.71±0.20	0.41±0.07	1.08±0.73
热带	BN	1.22±0.02	5.91±0.84	31.14±3.58	2.39±1.56	0.32±0.20	7.42±0.33	10.48±9.77	0.32±0.08	1.94±0.26
	BW	1.17±0.15	4.89±0.11	35.00±5.65	2.38±0.52	0.23±0.02	10.15±1.56	2.85±0.57	0.49±0.08	1.51±0.03
	HN	1.24±0.05	4.66±0.33	‒	2.01±0.45	0.31±0.07	6.55±0.05	0.26±0.06	0.44±0.03	1.26±0.39
	JF	1.32±0	5.65±0	39.00±0	1.53±0	0.17±0	8.90±0	1.52±0	0.51±0	1.18±0
高原	GG	1.03±0.30	4.49±0.97	34.14±13.60	5.87±3.66	0.42±0.18	13.13±3.78	8.31±2.87	0.49±0.12	1.34±0.28

环境参数	细菌	真菌	革兰氏阳性菌	革兰氏阴性菌	总PLFAs	真菌和细菌比	革兰氏阳性和阴性菌比
经度	0.158	0.141	0.106	-0.006	0.121	0.067	0.039
纬度	0.260**²⁾	0.348**	0.177	0.111	0.277**	0.335**	0.019
海拔高度	-0.030	0.077	-0.112	0.113	0.032	0.245*	-0.232*
年均温	-0.263**	-0.325**	-0.211*	-0.129	-0.293**	-0.281**	-0.049
年降水量	-0.183	-0.299**	-0.228*	-0.079	-0.261**	-0.347*	-0.194*
土壤容重	-0.232*³⁾	-0.321**	0.013	-0.249**	-0.192*	-0.328**	0.362**
pH	0.218*	0.333**	0.241*	0.081	0.279**	0.277**	0.183
凋落物碳质量分数	0.019	-0.083	-0.057	0.101	-0.027	-0.094	-0.179
土壤有机碳	0.509**	0.534**	0.303**	0.567**	0.498**	0.312**	-0.293**
土壤总氮	0.590**	0.603**	0.426**	0.582**	0.585**	0.205*	-0.174
土壤碳氮比	-0.047	-0.042	-0.132	0.019	-0.076	0.090	-0.228*
土壤总磷	-0.051	-0.083	0.168	-0.093	0.049	0.104	0.325**

Pattern and Influencing Factors of Forest Soil Microbial Communities in Different Climate Types in China

中国不同气候类型森林土壤微生物群落结构及其影响因素

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 37

Related Articles 12

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LIANG Chuan, YANG Yanfang, YU Shanshan, ZHOU Li, ZHANG Jingwei, ZHANG Xiujuan. Differences of Microbial Biomass and Community Structure Characteristics in Sediments under Net-pen and Pond Fish Farming [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(8): 1487-1495.
[2]	CHEN Dongdong, HUO Lili, ZHAO Liang, CHEN Xin, SHU Min, HE Fuquan, ZHANG Yukun, ZHANG Li, LI Qi. Contribution of Water and Heat Factors to Spatial Variability of Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen in Qinghai Alpine Grassland: Based on Enhanced Regression Tree Model [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(7): 1207-1217.
[3]	LI Weiwen, HUANG Jinquan, QI Yujie, LIU Xiaolan, LIU Jigen, MAO Zhichao, GAO Xiufang. Meta-analysis of Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon Content and Its Influencing Factors under Soil Erosion [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(1): 47-55.
[4]	HUANG Weijia, LIU Chun, LIU Yue, HUANG Bin, LI Dingqiang, YUAN Zaijian. Soil Ecological Stoichiometry and Its Influencing Factors at Different Elevations in Nanling Mountains [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(1): 80-89.
[5]	CUI Qiao, LI Zongxing, ZHANG Baijuan, ZHAO Yue, NAN Fusen. A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Freezing and Thawing on Soil Dissolved Carbon and Nitrogen and Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen Contents [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(8): 1700-1712.
[6]	YU Yanghua, WU Yingu, SONG Yanping, LI Yitong. Stoichiometric Characteristics of Soil Microbial Concentration and Biomass in Zanthoxylum planispinum var. Dintanensis Plantations of Different Ages [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(6): 1160-1168.
[7]	SUN Jianbo, CHANG Wenjun, LI Wenbin, ZHANG Shiqing, LI Chunqiang, PENG Ming. Dynamics of Soil Microbial Biomass and Enzyme Activities in Rhizosphere Soil at Different Growing Stages of Banana [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(6): 1169-1174.
[8]	ZHU Li'an, ZHANG Huihua, CHENG Jiong, LI Ting, LIN ZI, LI Junjie. Potential Ecological Risk Pattern Analysis of Heavy Metals in Soil of Forestry Land in The Pearl River Delta [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(6): 1253-1262.
[9]	LIANG Jiawei, YU Weimin, YAO Yuling, HU Qiqi, LU Danmian, WANG Rongping, LIAO Xinrong, HUANG Saihua. Effects of a Bio-organic Fertilizer on Soil Quality and Vegetable Yield [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(3): 497-503.
[10]	HU Rui, FANG Huanying, XIAO Shengsheng, DUAN Jian, ZHANG Jie, LIU Hongguang, TANG Chongjun. Soil Carbon Sink Effect of Main Management Models in Typical Granite Erosion Area of Red Soil in South China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(8): 1617-1626.
[11]	ZHANG Jian, XU Ming, WANG Yang, WEN Chunyu, YANG Yunli, ZHANG Jiao, NIE Kun. Distribution Characteristics of the Glomalin-Related Soil Protein of Different Pinus massoniana Association in Central Guizhou [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(12): 2303-2308.
[12]	YANG Hongbing, XIAO Yihua, LI Ming, XU Han, SHI Xin, GUO Xiaomin. Coupling Relationship between Soil Aggregate Stability and Microbial Extracellular Enzyme Activities in Typical Urban Forests during the Dry Season [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(10): 1976-1989.