Ecology and Environmental Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 1402-1411.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.09.007
• Research Article [Ecology] • Previous Articles Next Articles
Liu Xiaopeng1,2(
), Xu Cheng1,2, Tang Luozhong1,2,3,*(
)
Received:2026-01-05
Revised:2026-07-06
Accepted:2026-08-13
Online:2026-09-18
Published:2026-09-16
通讯作者:
唐罗忠, E-mail: 作者简介:刘晓朋(1998年生),男,硕士,主要从事林农复合经营理论与技术研究。E-mail: liuxp19981222@163.com
基金资助:CLC Number:
Liu Xiaopeng, Xu Cheng, Tang Luozhong. Effects of Poplar-crop Intercropping and Fertilization on the Soil Nutrients and Plant Growth[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(9): 1402-1411.
刘晓朋, 徐成, 唐罗忠. 杨树农作物间作与施肥对土壤养分和植物生长的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(9): 1402-1411.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.09.007
| 处理 | 种植模式 | 施肥量/(g·pot−1) |
|---|---|---|
| P10 | 杨树 | 10 |
| P5 | 杨树 | 5 |
| P0 | 杨树 | 0 |
| PA10 | 杨树+小麦+大豆 | 10 |
| PA5 | 杨树+小麦+大豆 | 5 |
| PA0 | 杨树+小麦+大豆 | 0 |
| A10 | 小麦+大豆 | 10 |
| A5 | 小麦+大豆 | 5 |
| A0 | 小麦+大豆 | 0 |
| CK | 不种植 | 0 |
Table 1 Planting patterns and fertilization treatments
| 处理 | 种植模式 | 施肥量/(g·pot−1) |
|---|---|---|
| P10 | 杨树 | 10 |
| P5 | 杨树 | 5 |
| P0 | 杨树 | 0 |
| PA10 | 杨树+小麦+大豆 | 10 |
| PA5 | 杨树+小麦+大豆 | 5 |
| PA0 | 杨树+小麦+大豆 | 0 |
| A10 | 小麦+大豆 | 10 |
| A5 | 小麦+大豆 | 5 |
| A0 | 小麦+大豆 | 0 |
| CK | 不种植 | 0 |
| 处理 | 苗高/cm | 地径/mm |
|---|---|---|
| P10 | 311.2±17.8Aa | 23.9±0.6Aa |
| P5 | 302.3±17.0Aa | 21.1±0.7Ab |
| P0 | 245.7±14.9Ab | 15.3±0.4Ac |
| PA10 | 302.6±16.5Aa | 20.6±0.7Ba |
| PA5 | 268.4±7.0Bb | 18.0±0.3Bb |
| PA0 | 205.2±12.7Bc | 14.2±0.4Bc |
Table 2 Poplar growth under different planting patterns and different fertilization amount
| 处理 | 苗高/cm | 地径/mm |
|---|---|---|
| P10 | 311.2±17.8Aa | 23.9±0.6Aa |
| P5 | 302.3±17.0Aa | 21.1±0.7Ab |
| P0 | 245.7±14.9Ab | 15.3±0.4Ac |
| PA10 | 302.6±16.5Aa | 20.6±0.7Ba |
| PA5 | 268.4±7.0Bb | 18.0±0.3Bb |
| PA0 | 205.2±12.7Bc | 14.2±0.4Bc |
| 处理 | 籽粒数/(grain·pot−1) | 千粒质量/g | 产量/(kg·hm−2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 杨麦间作+施肥10g | 456.3±86.0Ba | 33.4±2.5Aab | 2308.9±487.0Ba |
| 杨麦间作+施肥5g | 226.7±34.5Bb | 34.7±1.4Aa | 1197.6±227.4Bb |
| 杨麦间作+施肥0g | 26.1±3.3Bc | 30.0±1.8Ab | 118.1±20.2Bc |
| 小麦单作+施肥10g | 928.2±137.4Aa | 35.3±1.2Aab | 4977.0±875.1Aa |
| 小麦单作+施肥5g | 525.3±66.8Ab | 37.8±2.9Aa | 2998.4±362.4Ab |
| 小麦单作+施肥0g | 152.0±20.7Ac | 32.0±2.6Ab | 735.1±57.1Ac |
Table 3 Thousand grain weight and yield of wheat under different planting patterns and different fertilization amount
| 处理 | 籽粒数/(grain·pot−1) | 千粒质量/g | 产量/(kg·hm−2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 杨麦间作+施肥10g | 456.3±86.0Ba | 33.4±2.5Aab | 2308.9±487.0Ba |
| 杨麦间作+施肥5g | 226.7±34.5Bb | 34.7±1.4Aa | 1197.6±227.4Bb |
| 杨麦间作+施肥0g | 26.1±3.3Bc | 30.0±1.8Ab | 118.1±20.2Bc |
| 小麦单作+施肥10g | 928.2±137.4Aa | 35.3±1.2Aab | 4977.0±875.1Aa |
| 小麦单作+施肥5g | 525.3±66.8Ab | 37.8±2.9Aa | 2998.4±362.4Ab |
| 小麦单作+施肥0g | 152.0±20.7Ac | 32.0±2.6Ab | 735.1±57.1Ac |
| 处理 | 籽粒数/(grain·pot−1) | 百粒质量/g | 产量/(kg·hm−2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 杨豆间作+施肥10 g | 71.0±13.9Ba | 16.6±1.8Aa | 1767.7±267.4Ba |
| 杨豆间作+施肥5 g | 69.3±11.0Ba | 15.1±1.7Aa | 1551.8±148.2Ba |
| 杨豆间作+施肥0 g | 63.2±15.5Ba | 14.2±1.4Aa | 1399.9±107.4Ba |
| 大豆单作+施肥10 g | 186.3±9.2Aa | 16.3±1.1Aa | 4601.3±311.9Aa |
| 大豆单作+施肥5 g | 120.0±11.1Ab | 16.2±0.5Aa | 2946.8±245.7Ab |
| 大豆单作+施肥0 g | 94.7±11.9Ac | 14.3±0.5Ab | 2054.1±187.9Ac |
Table 4 Hundred grain weight and yield of soybean under different planting patterns and different fertilization amount
| 处理 | 籽粒数/(grain·pot−1) | 百粒质量/g | 产量/(kg·hm−2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 杨豆间作+施肥10 g | 71.0±13.9Ba | 16.6±1.8Aa | 1767.7±267.4Ba |
| 杨豆间作+施肥5 g | 69.3±11.0Ba | 15.1±1.7Aa | 1551.8±148.2Ba |
| 杨豆间作+施肥0 g | 63.2±15.5Ba | 14.2±1.4Aa | 1399.9±107.4Ba |
| 大豆单作+施肥10 g | 186.3±9.2Aa | 16.3±1.1Aa | 4601.3±311.9Aa |
| 大豆单作+施肥5 g | 120.0±11.1Ab | 16.2±0.5Aa | 2946.8±245.7Ab |
| 大豆单作+施肥0 g | 94.7±11.9Ac | 14.3±0.5Ab | 2054.1±187.9Ac |
| 施肥量 | Lp | La | L |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 g | 0.93±0.01a | 0.44±0.07a | 1.37±0.04a |
| 5 g | 0.88±0.01b | 0.48±0.03a | 1.36±0.05ab |
| 0 g | 0.86±0.02b | 0.41±0.01a | 1.27±0.02b |
Table 5 Land equivalent ratio of poplar-crop intercropping under different fertilization amount
| 施肥量 | Lp | La | L |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 g | 0.93±0.01a | 0.44±0.07a | 1.37±0.04a |
| 5 g | 0.88±0.01b | 0.48±0.03a | 1.36±0.05ab |
| 0 g | 0.86±0.02b | 0.41±0.01a | 1.27±0.02b |
| 植物性状 | pH | 铵态氮 | 硝态氮 | 有效磷 | 速效钾 | 有机质 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 小麦籽粒数 | −0.107 | 0.712 | 0.815* | −0.034 | 0.225 | −0.558 |
| 小麦千粒质量 | 0.045 | 0.768 | 0.592 | −0.280 | 0.074 | −0.571 |
| 小麦产量 | −0.067 | 0.731 | 0.814* | −0.072 | 0.191 | −0.568 |
| 大豆籽粒数 | −0.125 | −0.766 | 0.708 | 0.071 | −0.430 | −0.759 |
| 大豆百粒质量 | −0.847* | −0.637 | 0.229 | 0.614 | 0.442 | 0.030 |
| 大豆产量 | −0.200 | −0.783 | 0.675 | 0.138 | −0.368 | −0.707 |
| 杨树苗高 | −0.798 | 0.006 | 0.341 | 0.791 | 0.868* | −0.694 |
| 杨树地径 | −0.758 | 0.087 | 0.261 | 0.874* | 0.924** | −0.779 |
Table 6 Correlation analysis between soil nutrient mass fraction and growth of crops and poplar seedlings
| 植物性状 | pH | 铵态氮 | 硝态氮 | 有效磷 | 速效钾 | 有机质 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 小麦籽粒数 | −0.107 | 0.712 | 0.815* | −0.034 | 0.225 | −0.558 |
| 小麦千粒质量 | 0.045 | 0.768 | 0.592 | −0.280 | 0.074 | −0.571 |
| 小麦产量 | −0.067 | 0.731 | 0.814* | −0.072 | 0.191 | −0.568 |
| 大豆籽粒数 | −0.125 | −0.766 | 0.708 | 0.071 | −0.430 | −0.759 |
| 大豆百粒质量 | −0.847* | −0.637 | 0.229 | 0.614 | 0.442 | 0.030 |
| 大豆产量 | −0.200 | −0.783 | 0.675 | 0.138 | −0.368 | −0.707 |
| 杨树苗高 | −0.798 | 0.006 | 0.341 | 0.791 | 0.868* | −0.694 |
| 杨树地径 | −0.758 | 0.087 | 0.261 | 0.874* | 0.924** | −0.779 |
| [1] |
Dollinger J, Jose S, 2018. Agroforestry for soil health[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 92(2): 213-219.
DOI |
| [2] |
Guo J H, Liu X J, Zhang Y, et al., 2010. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands[J]. Science, 327(5968): 1008-1010.
DOI PMID |
| [3] |
Hildreth L A, 2008. The economic impacts of agroforestry in the northern plains of China[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 72(2): 119-126.
DOI URL |
| [4] | Mcrae S M, 2024. Agroforestry in temperate-climate commercial agriculture: Feedback from agroforestry practitioners in the Mid-Atlantic United States[J]. Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene, 12(1): 00136. |
| [5] |
Moreno G, Obrador J J, Garcia A, 2007. Impact of evergreen oaks on soil fertility and crop production in intercropped dehesas[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 119(3-4): 270-280.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
Panozzo A, Quataert P, De Swaef T, et al., 2026. A meta-analysis on the impact of trees on yield of intercrops in alley-cropping systems of temperate climates[J]. Agricultural Systems, 232: 104578.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
Rao M R, Willey R W, 1980. Evaluation of yield stability in intercropping: Studies on sorghum/pigeonpea[J]. Experimental Agriculture, 16(2): 105-116.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
Udawatta R P, Rankoth L M, Jose S, 2019. Agroforestry and biodiversity[J]. Sustainability, 11(10): 2879.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
Wanvestraut R H, Jose S, Nair P K R, et al., 2004. Competition for water in a pecan (Carya illinoensis K. Koch) - cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) alley cropping system in the southern United States[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 60(2): 167-179.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
Xu C, Qian Z Z, Wang B, et al., 2023. Effects of poplar agroforestry systems on soil nutrient and enzyme activity in the coastal region of eastern China[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 23: 3108-3123.
DOI |
| [11] |
Yang T, Ouyang X Y, Wang B, et al., 2023. Understanding the effects of tree-crop intercropping systems on crop production in China by combining field experiments with a meta-analysis[J]. Agricultural Systems, 210: 103705.
DOI URL |
| [12] | Zomer R J, Trabucco A, Coe R, et al., 2014. Trees on farms: An update and reanalysis of agroforestry’s global extent and socio-ecological characteristics[C]// Working Paper 179, Bogor, Indonesia: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southeast Asia Regional Program. |
| [13] | 蔡宇星, 黄山, 阳小凤, 等, 2025. 根瘤菌与施肥量对洞庭湖区春大豆生长与产量的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 43(4): 975-984. |
| Cai Y X, Huang S, Yang X F, et al., 2025. Effects of rhizobia and fertilizer application rate on growth and yield of spring soybean in the Dongting Lake Area[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 43(4): 975-984. | |
| [14] | 蔡智才, 毕华兴, 许华森, 等, 2018. 晋西黄土区苹果花生间作系统小气候效应[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 36(2): 234-241. |
| Cai Z C, Bi H X, Xu H S, et al., 2018. The microclimate effect of Malus pumila and Arachis hypogaea intercropping system in the loess plateau of West Shanxi Province[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 36(2): 234-241. | |
| [15] | 方升佐, 徐锡增, 吕士行, 2004. 杨树定向培育[M]. 合肥: 安徽科学技术出版社. |
| Fang S Z, Xu X Z, Lü S X, 2004. Poplar cultivation under target determination[M]. Hefei: Anhui Science and Technology Publishing House. | |
| [16] | 富丰珍, 徐程扬, 李广德, 2010. 我国杨树林农复合经营现状及存在的问题[J]. 西北林学院学报, 25(2): 221-224. |
| Fu F Z, Xu C Y, Li G D, 2010. Current situations and problems in the agroforestry management model of poplar plantation in China[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 25(2): 221-224. | |
| [17] |
洪壮壮, 曾占奎, 宋俊乔, 等, 2024. 小麦籽粒钙和钾含量的QTL定位及遗传效应分析[J]. 华北农学报, 39(4): 37-46.
DOI |
|
Hong Z Z, Zeng Z K, Song J Q, et al., 2024. QTL mapping and genetic effect analysis of calcium and potassium content in wheat grain[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 39(4): 37-46.
DOI |
|
| [18] | 李俊祥, 宛志沪, 2002. 淮北平原杨-麦间作系统的小气候效应与土壤水分变化研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 13(4): 390-394. |
| Li J X, Wan Z H, 2002. Microclimatic effect and soil moisture change of poplar-wheat intercropping systems in Huaibei Plain[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 13(4): 390-394. | |
| [19] | 李玫, 王天华, 魏刚, 等, 1995. 杨树、刺槐混交及缺钾情况下对矿物钾的利用[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 17(2): 99-103. |
| Li M, Wang T H, Wei G, et al., 1995. Studies on the uptake of mineral K by mixed plantings of poplar and black locust under K-deficiency[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 17(2): 99-103. | |
| [20] |
祁雪连, 葛晓敏, 钱壮壮, 等, 2021. 武夷山天然针阔混交林与毛竹人工林土壤性质差异[J]. 生态环境学报, 30(8): 1599-1606.
DOI |
| Qi X L, Ge X M, Qian Z Z, et al., 2021. Differences of soil properties between natural mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forest and Moso bamboo plantation in Wuyi Mountains[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 30(8): 1599-1606. | |
| [21] | 滕应, 沈仁芳, 李九玉, 等, 2025. 中国耕地土壤酸化现状、研究进展与重点方向[J]. 土壤, 57(6): 1219-1227. |
| Teng Y, Shen R F, Li J Y, et al., 2025. Current situation, research progress and key directions of soil acidification in cultivated land in China[J]. Soils, 57(6): 1219-1227. | |
| [22] | 魏万玲, 2024. 施肥与根瘤菌对黑土大豆根际微生物组的影响及固氮溶磷菌群构建[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院. |
| Wei W L, 2024. Effects of fertilization and rhizobium on rhizosphere microbiome of soybean in black soil and construction of nitrogen-fixing and phosphorus-solubilizing bacterial community[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. | |
| [23] |
魏勇, 张焕朝, 张金龙, 2003. 杨树根际土壤磷的分布特征及其有效性[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 27(5): 20-24.
DOI |
| Wei Y, Zhang H C, Zhang J L, 2003. Poplar root-induced distribution characteristics of soil phosphorus and its availability[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 27(5): 20-24. | |
| [24] | 吴存荣, 魏立立, 乔丽娜, 等, 2018. 谷物与豆类千粒重的测定: GB/T 5519-2018[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社: 1-7. |
| Wu C R, Wei L L, Qiao L N, et al., 2018. Cereals and pulses- Determination of the mass of 1000 grains: GB/T 5519-2018[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press: 1-7. | |
| [25] | 夏玄, 2018. 氮素营养对大豆结瘤固氮及相关调控物质影响的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学. |
| Xia X, 2018. Study on the effect of nitrogen nutrition on soybean nodulation and nitrogen fixation and related regulation substances[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University. | |
| [26] | 许华森, 毕华兴, 高路博, 等, 2014. 晋西黄土区苹果+大豆间作系统小气候及其对作物生产力的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 12(2): 9-15. |
| Xu H S, Bi H X, Gao L B, et al., 2014. Microclimate and its effects on crop productivity in the Malus pumila and Glycine max intercropping systems on the Loess Plateau of West Shanxi Province[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 12(2): 9-15. | |
| [27] | 杨灿, 李建军, 黄静, 等, 2017. 洞庭湖洲滩人工林林农复合经营模式与综合效益研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 37(5): 106-112. |
| Yang C, Li J J, Huang J, et al., 2017. Research of agroforestry compound management model and general benefits on Dongting Lake marshland plantation[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 37(5): 106-112. | |
| [28] | 张焕朝, 王改萍, 徐锡增, 等, 2003. 根际酸化作用对杨树无性系磷营养效率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 14(10): 1607-1611. |
| Zhang H C, Wang G P, Xu X Z, et al., 2003. Effects of rhizosphere acidification on phosphorus efficiency in clones of poplar[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 14(10): 1607-1611. | |
| [29] | 张占田, 樊兆博, 冷伟锋, 等, 2025. 硅钙钾镁肥对小麦土壤、产量、养分利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料 (5): 141-153. |
| Zhang Z T, Fan Z B, Leng W F, et al., 2025. Effects of silicon-calcium-potassium-magnesium fertilizer on wheat soil, yield and nutrient utilization[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China (5): 141-153. | |
| [30] |
周苗苗, 汤锐恒, 台玉莹, 等, 2023. 大豆钾营养及其分子调控机制研究进展[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 45(3): 444-453.
DOI |
| Zhou M M, Tang R H, Tai Y Y, et al., 2023. Research progress on potassium nutrient and molecular regulatory mechanism of soybean[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 45(3): 444-453. |
| [1] | Cao Yun, Cheng Chunxiang, Chen Zixuan, Bo Yu, Sun Yinglong, Yu Min. Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Carbon Sequestration Capacity and Its Climatic Drivers in the Northeast Forest Region of China [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(9): 1329-1341. |
| [2] | Zhang Ji, Yang Shiqi, Zhang Tianyu, Liu Zhiqiang, Ao Yang. Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Net Ecosystem Productivity in Chongqing Based on the CASA-GSMSR Model [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(9): 1342-1355. |
| [3] | Qin Meiou, Jiang Peng, Wen Rihong, Zhu Mengyuan, Yang Feiyun, Feng Ailin, Fang Yuan, Cai Fu. Effects of Atmospheric Drought on Vegetation Productivity in Typical Temperate Ecosystems of China [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(7): 1037-1044. |
| [4] | Yao Xubing, Zhang Ling, Che Sifang, Deng Xiaoxia. Study on the Impact of Digital Rural Development on Agricultural Ecological Efficiency [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(7): 1045-1058. |
| [5] | CAI Nana, WU Liucui, LIU Zhihui, QIAN Long, YANG Meihua, WANG Mengdie, YANG Guojiao, HU Zhongmin. Effects of Nitrogen and Water Addition on Ecosystem Productivity in a Temperate Typical Grassland of Inner Mongolia under Different Precipitation Backgrounds [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(6): 939-947. |
| [6] | CHEN Xuanxing, XIANG Yunyan, LIAO Jing, YANG Yuanzheng, ZU Jiaxing. Spatiotemporal Variation of Peak Phenology Metrics in China’s Grasslands and Analysis of Influencing Factors [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(5): 679-690. |
| [7] | ZHANG Tao, YANG Hui, CAO Jianhua, ZHOU Mengxia, KANG Zhiqiang. Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics of Vegetation Net Ecosystem Productivity in Guangxi Based on Lithological Zoning [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(5): 702-713. |
| [8] | LU Hao, CAO Guangchao, SU Wanfeng, ZHAO Meiliang, XUE Feng. Response of Vegetation Gross Primary Productivity to Drought in the Gonghe Basin [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(4): 509-519. |
| [9] | CHENG Wenjie, NI Yongxin, LÜ Xizhi, MA Li, ZHANG Qiufen, WANG Jianwei, ZHANG Hengshuo, DENG Wenyan. Response Mechanism of Gross Primary Productivity to Climatic Drought in the Yellow River Source region [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(3): 393-402. |
| [10] | YU Yanju, DING Xue. Study on the Spatiotemporal Patterns and Driving Factors of Forest Vegetation Net Primary Productivity in the Central Yunnan Urban Agglomeration [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(2): 209-222. |
| [11] | XU Da, GONG Chengcheng, ZHANG Zaiyong, RAN Bin, HU Yue, WANG Hanbing, CHEN Chen. The Spatiotemporal Variation Patterns of Vegetation Net Primary Productivity and Its Influencing Factors in the Mu Us Sandy Land [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(9): 1361-1372. |
| [12] | DING Xin, LIU Jian, WEI Lihong, XIE Dewei, ZHENG Zhaopei. Spatiotemporal Patterns and Influencing Factors of Vegetation Net Ecosystem Productivity in Shandong Province Based on GSMSR Model [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(7): 1079-1089. |
| [13] | YUAN Yanfeng, HU Yonghong, WANG Hesong, LU Xiankai, HOU Meiting, JIA Gensuo. Impact of Heat Waves on Vegetation Productivity in Northern Europe [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(6): 831-844. |
| [14] | SONG Shuangshuang, QIN Shijiao, Sun Pengcheng, FU Xingtao. Estimation and Prediction of Vegetation Carbon Sinks in Fenhe River Basin Based on Multi-source Remote Sensing Data [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(3): 345-357. |
| [15] | GUO Zhao, SHI Yun, LIU Tieming, ZHANG Yuxin, YAN Yongzhi. Analysis of Spatiotemporal Patterns and Driving Factors of NPP on the Northern Slope of the Qinling Mountains from 2001 to 2020 [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(3): 401-410. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Website Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Add: 808# Tianyuan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou. 510650.
Institute of Eco-environmental and Soil Sciences, Guangdong Academy of Sciences
Tel/Fax: 020-87024961; E-mail: editor@jeesci.com
Support by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd., E-mail: support@magtech.com.cn