Ecology and Environmental Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 458-468.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.03.012
• Research Article [Environmental Science] • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Yukun1,2,3,4(
), CHEN Dongdong1,2,3,4, LI Qi1,2,3,4, HE Fuquan1,2,3,4, ZHANG Li1,2,3,4, ZHAO Liang1,2,3,4,*(
)
Received:2025-05-28
Revised:2025-09-17
Accepted:2025-11-11
Online:2026-03-18
Published:2026-03-13
张煜坤1,2,3,4(
), 陈懂懂1,2,3,4, 李奇1,2,3,4, 贺福全1,2,3,4, 张莉1,2,3,4, 赵亮1,2,3,4,*(
)
通讯作者:
*E-mail: 作者简介:张煜坤(1994年生),男,工程师,硕士,研究方向为生态环境保护。E-mail: zhangyukun@nwipb.cas.cn
基金资助:CLC Number:
ZHANG Yukun, CHEN Dongdong, LI Qi, HE Fuquan, ZHANG Li, ZHAO Liang. Source Analysis of Soil Heavy Metals Based on Multivariate Statistical Analysis and PMF Model: A Case Study of Sanjiangyuan[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(3): 458-468.
张煜坤, 陈懂懂, 李奇, 贺福全, 张莉, 赵亮. 基于多元统计分析和PMF模型的土壤重金属源解析——以三江源为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(3): 458-468.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.03.012
| E | R | 生态风险 级别 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 分级标准范围 | 本研究 | 分级标准范围 | 本研究 | ||
| <40 | <40 | <150 | <100 | 轻微风险 | |
| 40-80 | 40-80 | 150-300 | 100-200 | 中等风险 | |
| 80-160 | 80-160 | 300-600 | 200-400 | 较强风险 | |
| 160-320 | 160-320 | ≥600 | ≥400 | 很强风险 | |
| ≥320 | ≥320 | - | - | 极强风险 | |
Table1 Comparison Of E and R standards for different ecological risks with heavy metals between the Hkanson standards and this paper
| E | R | 生态风险 级别 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 分级标准范围 | 本研究 | 分级标准范围 | 本研究 | ||
| <40 | <40 | <150 | <100 | 轻微风险 | |
| 40-80 | 40-80 | 150-300 | 100-200 | 中等风险 | |
| 80-160 | 80-160 | 300-600 | 200-400 | 较强风险 | |
| 160-320 | 160-320 | ≥600 | ≥400 | 很强风险 | |
| ≥320 | ≥320 | - | - | 极强风险 | |
| 分布方位 | 采样点 | w(Pb)/(mg∙kg−1) | w(Cd)/(mg∙kg−1) | w(Cr)/(mg∙kg−1) | w(As)/(mg∙kg−1) | w(Hg)/(mg∙kg−1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 土壤深度/cm | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | |||||
| 北部 | QML | 6.32 | 6.73 | 0.051 | 0.04 | 39.63 | 39.12 | 10.11 | 10.3 | 0.02 | 0.014 | ||||
| WDL | 7.17 | 6.85 | 0.032 | 0.041 | 17.32 | 19.68 | 7.11 | 6.56 | 0.021 | 0.016 | |||||
| ZD | 9.45 | 9.72 | 0.066 | 0.07 | 37.16 | 37.52 | 10.82 | 11.84 | 0.051 | 0.019 | |||||
| KKXL | 4.68 | 4.69 | 0.021 | 0.025 | 14.5 | 16.63 | 8.63 | 9.03 | 0.011 | 0.0051 | |||||
| MD | 8.64 | 8.71 | 0.044 | 0.047 | 40.5 | 39.17 | 12.53 | 14.81 | 0.016 | 0.012 | |||||
| ELH | 14.11 | 13.85 | 0.029 | 0.021 | 31.21 | 33.25 | 20.21 | 20.81 | 0.014 | 0.009 | |||||
| 南部 | YS | 26.93 | 25.36 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 72.84 | 73.15 | 20.95 | 21.22 | 0.056 | 0.041 | ||||
| JZ | 11.67 | 12.45 | 0.073 | 0.077 | 58.63 | 58.43 | 13.13 | 13.6 | 0.045 | 0.035 | |||||
| CD | 9.24 | 10.24 | 0.047 | 0.054 | 53.26 | 47.76 | 12.91 | 15.9 | 0.066 | 0.049 | |||||
| BM | 10.73 | 10.41 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 56.3 | 56.71 | 13.05 | 12.9 | 0.033 | 0.028 | |||||
| NQ | 10.76 | 10.16 | 0.096 | 0.099 | 27.56 | 28.16 | 13.48 | 13.7 | 0.035 | 0.031 | |||||
| BT | 12.33 | 12.33 | 0.063 | 0.063 | 55.52 | 55.58 | 14.11 | 14.1 | 0.049 | 0.039 | |||||
| MQ | 9.41 | 9.56 | 0.063 | 0.069 | 46.52 | 48.52 | 11.82 | 11.5 | 0.032 | 0.028 | |||||
| 东部 | XH | 9.41 | 9.41 | 0.064 | 0.054 | 39.6 | 39.67 | 8.91 | 8.91 | 0.028 | 0.023 | ||||
| ZK | 23.21 | 20.85 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 63.15 | 62.25 | 28.95 | 29.12 | 0.017 | 0.013 | |||||
| GH | 20.08 | 16.86 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 46.22 | 47.58 | 14.38 | 15.32 | 0.062 | 0.041 | |||||
| HN | 10.13 | 9.43 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 50.26 | 48.56 | 12.53 | 13.02 | 0.032 | 0.032 | |||||
| GN | 19.11 | 18.97 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 45.03 | 44.32 | 11.03 | 12.98 | 0.039 | 0.028 | |||||
Table 2 The content of Pb, Cd, Cr, As, and Hg in different regions of Sanjiangyuan
| 分布方位 | 采样点 | w(Pb)/(mg∙kg−1) | w(Cd)/(mg∙kg−1) | w(Cr)/(mg∙kg−1) | w(As)/(mg∙kg−1) | w(Hg)/(mg∙kg−1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 土壤深度/cm | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | |||||
| 北部 | QML | 6.32 | 6.73 | 0.051 | 0.04 | 39.63 | 39.12 | 10.11 | 10.3 | 0.02 | 0.014 | ||||
| WDL | 7.17 | 6.85 | 0.032 | 0.041 | 17.32 | 19.68 | 7.11 | 6.56 | 0.021 | 0.016 | |||||
| ZD | 9.45 | 9.72 | 0.066 | 0.07 | 37.16 | 37.52 | 10.82 | 11.84 | 0.051 | 0.019 | |||||
| KKXL | 4.68 | 4.69 | 0.021 | 0.025 | 14.5 | 16.63 | 8.63 | 9.03 | 0.011 | 0.0051 | |||||
| MD | 8.64 | 8.71 | 0.044 | 0.047 | 40.5 | 39.17 | 12.53 | 14.81 | 0.016 | 0.012 | |||||
| ELH | 14.11 | 13.85 | 0.029 | 0.021 | 31.21 | 33.25 | 20.21 | 20.81 | 0.014 | 0.009 | |||||
| 南部 | YS | 26.93 | 25.36 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 72.84 | 73.15 | 20.95 | 21.22 | 0.056 | 0.041 | ||||
| JZ | 11.67 | 12.45 | 0.073 | 0.077 | 58.63 | 58.43 | 13.13 | 13.6 | 0.045 | 0.035 | |||||
| CD | 9.24 | 10.24 | 0.047 | 0.054 | 53.26 | 47.76 | 12.91 | 15.9 | 0.066 | 0.049 | |||||
| BM | 10.73 | 10.41 | 0.069 | 0.069 | 56.3 | 56.71 | 13.05 | 12.9 | 0.033 | 0.028 | |||||
| NQ | 10.76 | 10.16 | 0.096 | 0.099 | 27.56 | 28.16 | 13.48 | 13.7 | 0.035 | 0.031 | |||||
| BT | 12.33 | 12.33 | 0.063 | 0.063 | 55.52 | 55.58 | 14.11 | 14.1 | 0.049 | 0.039 | |||||
| MQ | 9.41 | 9.56 | 0.063 | 0.069 | 46.52 | 48.52 | 11.82 | 11.5 | 0.032 | 0.028 | |||||
| 东部 | XH | 9.41 | 9.41 | 0.064 | 0.054 | 39.6 | 39.67 | 8.91 | 8.91 | 0.028 | 0.023 | ||||
| ZK | 23.21 | 20.85 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 63.15 | 62.25 | 28.95 | 29.12 | 0.017 | 0.013 | |||||
| GH | 20.08 | 16.86 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 46.22 | 47.58 | 14.38 | 15.32 | 0.062 | 0.041 | |||||
| HN | 10.13 | 9.43 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 50.26 | 48.56 | 12.53 | 13.02 | 0.032 | 0.032 | |||||
| GN | 19.11 | 18.97 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 45.03 | 44.32 | 11.03 | 12.98 | 0.039 | 0.028 | |||||
| 重金属 元素 | 本研究区 | 青藏高原其他地区土壤重金属质量分数/(mg∙kg−1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 总样点 | 南部 | 北部 | 青海省背景值(郭立本等, | 青藏高原东北部(李雷明, | 青藏高原东北-西南(杨安等, | 环青海湖 (卫佩茹, | 青海湖流域表土(王平等, | 青海省重要交通沿线 (安思危, | 一江两河 (王伟鹏等, | 青海木里煤矿(王佟等, | |
| Pb | 9.36 | 12.97 | 8.41 | 20.9 | 72.49 | 28.65 | 21.86 | 20.47 | 32.91 | 35.81 | 240 |
| Cd | 0.06 | 0.1 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.68 | 0.17 | 0.62 | - | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.81 |
| Cr | 45.75 | 52.78 | 30.47 | 70.1 | 83.11 | 70.84 | 41.35 | 54.17 | 74.62 | 82.95 | 350.02 |
| As | 11.69 | 14.45 | 11.89 | 14.00 | - | - | 11.73 | 11.66 | 21.61 | - | 20.01 |
| Hg | 0.03 | 0.041 | 0.017 | 0.021 | 0.28 | 0.029 | 0.031 | 0.035 | 0.05 | 0.022 | 1.00 |
Table 3 Heavy metal content in soils of other regions of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and the characteristics of soil environmental background values in Qinghai Province
| 重金属 元素 | 本研究区 | 青藏高原其他地区土壤重金属质量分数/(mg∙kg−1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 总样点 | 南部 | 北部 | 青海省背景值(郭立本等, | 青藏高原东北部(李雷明, | 青藏高原东北-西南(杨安等, | 环青海湖 (卫佩茹, | 青海湖流域表土(王平等, | 青海省重要交通沿线 (安思危, | 一江两河 (王伟鹏等, | 青海木里煤矿(王佟等, | |
| Pb | 9.36 | 12.97 | 8.41 | 20.9 | 72.49 | 28.65 | 21.86 | 20.47 | 32.91 | 35.81 | 240 |
| Cd | 0.06 | 0.1 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.68 | 0.17 | 0.62 | - | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.81 |
| Cr | 45.75 | 52.78 | 30.47 | 70.1 | 83.11 | 70.84 | 41.35 | 54.17 | 74.62 | 82.95 | 350.02 |
| As | 11.69 | 14.45 | 11.89 | 14.00 | - | - | 11.73 | 11.66 | 21.61 | - | 20.01 |
| Hg | 0.03 | 0.041 | 0.017 | 0.021 | 0.28 | 0.029 | 0.031 | 0.035 | 0.05 | 0.022 | 1.00 |
| 指标 | 富集因子指数 | 潜在生态风险指数 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 重金属元素 | Pb | Cd | Cr | As | Hg | - | |||||||
| 土壤深度/cm | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | |
| QML | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.88 | 1.31 | 59.50 | 47.27 | |
| MQ | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 1.08 | 1.13 | 1.89 | 1.47 | 71.06 | 60.80 | |
| ZD | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.8 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.25 | 1.32 | 1.77 | 1.28 | 82.50 | 55.54 | |
| JZ | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 1.35 | 1.43 | 2.7 | 2.19 | 81.29 | 70.03 | |
| CD | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 1.55 | 1.59 | 3.81 | 3.37 | 112.46 | 75.72 | |
| NQ | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 1.37 | 1.41 | 1.93 | 1.84 | 83.61 | 70.76 | |
| BT | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.16 | 1.46 | 1.46 | 3.94 | 3.94 | 121.03 | 99.42 | |
| HN | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.91 | 0.71 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.92 | 1.58 | 96.73 | 64.00 | |
| XH | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.94 | 1.94 | 65.46 | 59.19 | |
| BM | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 1.07 | 1.18 | 1.19 | 1.2 | 2.17 | 2 | 80.67 | 74.18 | |
| KKXL | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.99 | 1.05 | 0.84 | 0.66 | 26.16 | 28.10 | |
| MD | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 1.18 | 1.35 | 1.19 | 0.85 | 50.78 | 45.92 | |
| GN | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 1.08 | 1.06 | 1.13 | 1.05 | 107.57 | 100.62 | |
| GH | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 1.26 | 1.35 | 1.26 | 1.28 | 1.29 | 1.09 | 138.07 | 127.19 | |
| WDL | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 27.34 | 24.49 | |
| ELH | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 52.43 | 49.56 | |
| YS | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 1.02 | 1.09 | 1.41 | 1.52 | 3.15 | 3.01 | 168.74 | 151.08 | |
| ZK | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.63 | 0.77 | 1.05 | 1.12 | 1.68 | 1.55 | 109.84 | 105.43 | |
Table 4 Potential ecological risk index and enrichment factor index of each sampling site
| 指标 | 富集因子指数 | 潜在生态风险指数 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 重金属元素 | Pb | Cd | Cr | As | Hg | - | |||||||
| 土壤深度/cm | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | 0-10 | 10-20 | |
| QML | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.88 | 1.31 | 59.50 | 47.27 | |
| MQ | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 1.08 | 1.13 | 1.89 | 1.47 | 71.06 | 60.80 | |
| ZD | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.8 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.25 | 1.32 | 1.77 | 1.28 | 82.50 | 55.54 | |
| JZ | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 1.35 | 1.43 | 2.7 | 2.19 | 81.29 | 70.03 | |
| CD | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 1.55 | 1.59 | 3.81 | 3.37 | 112.46 | 75.72 | |
| NQ | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 1.37 | 1.41 | 1.93 | 1.84 | 83.61 | 70.76 | |
| BT | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 1.16 | 1.46 | 1.46 | 3.94 | 3.94 | 121.03 | 99.42 | |
| HN | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.91 | 0.71 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.92 | 1.58 | 96.73 | 64.00 | |
| XH | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.94 | 1.94 | 65.46 | 59.19 | |
| BM | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 1.07 | 1.18 | 1.19 | 1.2 | 2.17 | 2 | 80.67 | 74.18 | |
| KKXL | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.99 | 1.05 | 0.84 | 0.66 | 26.16 | 28.10 | |
| MD | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 1.18 | 1.35 | 1.19 | 0.85 | 50.78 | 45.92 | |
| GN | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 1.08 | 1.06 | 1.13 | 1.05 | 107.57 | 100.62 | |
| GH | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 1.26 | 1.35 | 1.26 | 1.28 | 1.29 | 1.09 | 138.07 | 127.19 | |
| WDL | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 27.34 | 24.49 | |
| ELH | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 52.43 | 49.56 | |
| YS | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 1.02 | 1.09 | 1.41 | 1.52 | 3.15 | 3.01 | 168.74 | 151.08 | |
| ZK | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.63 | 0.77 | 1.05 | 1.12 | 1.68 | 1.55 | 109.84 | 105.43 | |
| 土壤深度/cm | 主成分 | 特征值 | 方差 | 累积方差 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-10 | 1 | 3.11 | 62.20 | 62.19 |
| 2 | 0.79 | 15.85 | 78.05 | |
| 3 | 0.49 | 9.87 | 87.92 | |
| 4 | 0.42 | 8.39 | 96.30 | |
| 5 | 0.19 | 3.70 | 100.00 | |
| 10-20 | 1 | 3.20 | 64.95 | 63.95 |
| 2 | 0.79 | 15.59 | 79.74 | |
| 3 | 0.53 | 10.61 | 90.35 | |
| 4 | 0.36 | 7.25 | 97.61 | |
| 5 | 0.12 | 2.39 | 100.00 |
Table 5 Results of principal component analysis
| 土壤深度/cm | 主成分 | 特征值 | 方差 | 累积方差 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-10 | 1 | 3.11 | 62.20 | 62.19 |
| 2 | 0.79 | 15.85 | 78.05 | |
| 3 | 0.49 | 9.87 | 87.92 | |
| 4 | 0.42 | 8.39 | 96.30 | |
| 5 | 0.19 | 3.70 | 100.00 | |
| 10-20 | 1 | 3.20 | 64.95 | 63.95 |
| 2 | 0.79 | 15.59 | 79.74 | |
| 3 | 0.53 | 10.61 | 90.35 | |
| 4 | 0.36 | 7.25 | 97.61 | |
| 5 | 0.12 | 2.39 | 100.00 |
| [1] |
AN S W, LIU N T, LI X M, et al., 2022. Understanding heavy metal accumulation in roadside soils along major roads in the Tibet Plateau[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 802: 149865.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
BAI Y R, ZHANG Y H, LIU X, et al., 2023. The spatial distribution and source apportionment of heavy metals in soil of Shizuishan, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 82(21): 494.
DOI |
| [3] |
BHUIYAN M A H, KARMAKER S C, BODRUD-DOZA M, et al., 2021. Enrichment, sources and ecological risk mapping of heavy metals in agricultural soils of dhaka district employing SOM, PMF and GIS methods[J]. Chemosphere, 263: 128339.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
CHEN P, KANG S, BAI J, et al., 2015. Yak dung combustion aerosols in the Tibetan Plateau: Chemical characteristics and influence on the local atmospheric environment[J]. Atmospheric Research, 156: 58-66.
DOI URL |
| [5] | CHEN R, HAN L, LIU Z, et al., 2022. Assessment of soil-heavy metal pollution and the health risks in a mining area from Southern Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 10(7): 385. |
| [6] |
CHI H J, LIU X, YANG X F, et al., 2024. Risk assessment and source identification of soil heavy metals: a case study of farmland soil along a river in the southeast of a mining area in Southwest China[J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 46(2): 39.
DOI PMID |
| [7] |
DE SILVA S, BALL A S, HUYNH T, et al., 2016. Metal accumulation in roadside soil in Melbourne, Australia: Effect of road age, traffic density and vehicular speed[J]. Environmental Pollution, 208(Part A): 102-109.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
DU H L, WANG J S, WANG Y, et al., 2023. Contamination characteristics, source analysis, and spatial prediction of soil heavy metal concentrations on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 23(5): 2202-2215.
DOI |
| [9] |
GUÉDÉ K G, YU Z B, SIMONOVIC S P, et al., 2025. Combined effect of landuse/landcover and climate change projection on the spatiotemporal streamflow response in cryosphere catchment in the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 376: 124353.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
HAN R Y, XU Z F, 2022. Spatial distribution and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in karst soils from the Yinjiang County, Southwest China[J]. Peer J, 10: e12716.
DOI URL |
| [11] | HE L H, GAO X H, 2016. Assessment of potential ecological risk for soil heavy metals in Sanjiang Source Region: A case study of Yushu County, Qinghai Province[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 35(6): 1071-1080. |
| [12] |
LIANG J H, LIU Z Y, TIAN Y Q, et al., 2023. Research on health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil based on multi-factor source apportionment: A case study in Guangdong Province, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 858(Part 3): 159991.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
LIU Y L, WANG J F, GUO J M, et al., 2022. Vertical distribution characteristics of soil mercury and its formation mechanism in permafrost regions: A case study of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 113: 311-321.
DOI PMID |
| [14] | LIU Z P, WANG L, YAN M J, et al., 2024. Source apportionment of soil heavy metals based on multivariate statistical analysis and the PMF model: A case study of the Nanyang Basin, China[J]. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 33: 103537. |
| [15] |
LONG Z J, ZHU H, BING H J, et al., 2021. Contamination, sources and health risk of heavy metals in soil and dust from different functional areas in an industrial city of Panzhihua City, Southwest China[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 420: 126638.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
MARRUGO-NEGRETE J, PINEDO-HERNÁNDEZ J, DÍEZ S, 2017. Assessment of heavy metal pollution, spatial distribution and origin in agricultural soils along the Sinú River Basin, Colombia[J]. Environmental research, 154: 380-388.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
NURALYKYZY B, WANG P, DENG X, et al., 2021. Heavy metal contents and assessment of soil contamination in different land-use types in the Qaidam Basin[J]. Sustainability, 13(21): 12020.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
SHAH M T, ARA J, MUHAMMAD S, et al., 2012. Health risk assessment via surface water and sub-surface water consumption in the mafic and ultramafic terrain, Mohmand agency, northern Pakistan[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 118: 60-67.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
TAN C, WANG H, YANG Q C, et al., 2023. An integrated approach for quantifying source apportionment and source-oriented health risk of heavy metals in soils near an old industrial area[J]. Environmental Pollution, 323: 121271.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
TEPANOSYAN G, SAHAKYAN L, BELYAEVA O, et al., 2017. Human health risk assessment and riskiest heavy metal origin identification in urban soils of Yerevan, Armenia[J]. Chemosphere, 184: 1230-1240.
DOI PMID |
| [21] | WANG G, ZENG C, ZHANG F, et al., 2017. Traffic-related trace elements in soils along six highway segments on the Tibetan Plateau: Influence factors and spatial variation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 581: 811-821. |
| [22] |
YUAN S J, YANG G D, ZHANG X L, et al., 2025. Assessment of distribution, contamination, ecological risks, and sources of heavy metals in soil from metal recycling sites[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 197(6): 1-19.
DOI |
| [23] |
ZHANG H, WANG Z F, ZHANG Y L, et al., 2015. Identification of traffic-related metals and the effects of different environments on their enrichment in roadside soils along the Qinghai-Tibet highway[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 521-522: 160-172.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
ZHANG T, WANG P, WANG M G, et al., 2023b. Spatial distribution, source identification, and risk assessment of heavy metals in riparian soils of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Environmental Research, 237: 116977.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
ZHANG Y X, SONG B, ZHOU Z Y, 2023a. Pollution assessment and source apportionment of heavy metals in soil from lead-zinc mining areas of south China[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 11(2): 109320.
DOI URL |
| [26] |
ZHENG J T, WANG P, SHI H Y, et al., 2023. Quantitative source apportionment and driver identification of soil heavy metals using advanced machine learning techniques[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 873: 162371.
DOI URL |
| [27] | 安思危, 2021. 青藏高原重要交通沿线土壤-植被重金属累积特征与过程解析[D]. 重庆: 西南大学. |
| AN S W, 2021. Accumulation characteristics and progresses of heavy metals in soil-vegetation system along the important roads in the Tibet Plateau[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University. | |
| [28] | 陈林, 马琨, 马建军, 等, 2023. 宁夏引黄灌区农田土壤重金属生态风险评价及来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 44(1): 356-366. |
|
CHEN L, MA K, MA J J, et al., 2023. Risk assessment and sources of heavy metals in farmland soils of Yellow River irrigation area of Ningxia[J]. Environmental Science, 44(1): 356-366.
DOI URL |
|
| [29] | 杜昊霖, 王莺, 王劲松, 等, 2021. 青藏高原典型流域土壤重金属分布特征及其生态风险评价[J]. 环境科学, 42(9): 4422-4431. |
|
DU H L, WANG Y, WANG J S, et al., 2021. Distribution characteristics and ecological risk assessment of soil heavy metals in typical watersheds of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Environmental Science, 42(9): 4422-4431.
DOI URL |
|
| [30] | 高越, 吕童, 张蕴凯, 等, 2023. PMF和RF模型联用的土壤重金属污染来源解析与污染评价: 以西北某典型工业园区为例[J]. 环境科学, 44(6): 3488-3499. |
| GAO Y, LÜ T, ZHANG Y K, et al., 2023. Source apportionment and pollution assessment of soil heavy metal pollution using PMF and RF model: A case study of a typical industrial park in northwest China[J]. Environmental Science, 44(6): 3488-3499. | |
| [31] | 郭立本, 郭竞世, 1995. 青海省土壤环境背景值研究实验室质量控制[J]. 青海环境, 5(1): 40-42. |
| GUO L B, GUO J S, 1995. Quality Control of the Research Laboratory on Soil Environmental Background Values in Qinghai Province[J]. Journal of Qinghai Environment, 5(1): 40-42. | |
| [32] | 宫殿清, 王兆锋, 张镱锂, 等, 2025. 西藏一江两河地区草地土壤重金属的富集程度及其源解析[J]. 环境科学, 46(9): 6046-6055. |
| GONG D Q, WANG Z F, ZHANG Y L, et al., 2025. Enrichment levels and source apportionment of heavy metals in grassland soil of the one river and its two tributaries in Xizang[J]. Environmental Science, 46(9): 6046-6055. | |
| [33] | 韩琳, 徐夕博, 2020. 基于PMF模型及地统计的土壤重金属健康风险定量评价[J]. 环境科学, 41(11): 5114-5124. |
|
HAN L, XU X B, 2020. Quantitative evaluation of human health risk of heavy metals in soils based on positive matrix factorization model and Geo-statistics[J]. Environmental Science, 41(11): 5114-5124.
DOI URL |
|
| [34] | 何林华, 高小红, 2016. 三江源区土壤重金属的累积特征及潜在生态风险评价——以青海省玉树县为例[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 35(6): 1071-1080. |
| HE L H, GAO X H, 2016. Assessment of potential ecological risk for soil heavy metals in Sanjiang Source Region: A case study of Yushu[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 35(6): 1071-80. | |
| [35] | 李雷明, 2020. 青藏高原东北部土壤痕量元素环境地球化学行为[D]. 西宁: 中国科学院青海盐湖研究所. |
| LI L M, 2020. Environmental geochemical behaviors of trace elements in soils of the northeastern Qinhai-Tibet Plateau[D]. Xining: Qinghai Institute of Salt Lakes, Chinese Academy of Sciences. | |
| [36] | 李文明, 孙朝, 陈霄燕, 等, 2023. 青海省典型高山农业区域土壤重金属污染评价及来源探析[J]. 岩矿测试, 42(3): 598-615. |
| LI W M, SUN Z, CHEN X Y, et al., 2023. Evaluation and source of heavy metal pollution in surface soils in typical alpine agricultural areas of Qinghai Province[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 42(3): 598-615. | |
| [37] | 孙雪纯, 侯书贵, 黄壬晖, 等, 2023. 可可西里特拉什湖中微塑料污染特征、来源和生态风险[J]. 环境科学学报, 43(2): 231-240. |
| SUN X C, HOU S G, HUANG R H, et al., 2023. Characteristics, sources and ecological risks of microplastics in Telashi Lake in Hoh Xil[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 43(2): 231-240. | |
| [38] | 孙友敏, 李少洛, 陈春竹, 等, 2018. 济南市机动车排气污染特征及对市区PM2.5的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 38(4): 1384-1391. |
| SUN Y M, LI S L, CHEN C Z, et al., 2018. Study on characteristics of vehicle exhaust and the influence on PM2.5 in Jinan City[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 38(4): 1384-1391. | |
| [39] | 未亚西, 贺慧丹, 罗谨, 等, 2018. 三江源畜牧业示范区土壤重金属含量特征及评[J]. 中国环境监测, 34(4): 95-101. |
| WEI Y X, HE H D, LUO J, et al., 2018. Characteristics and potential risks evaluation of soil heavy metals of the stockbreeding demonstration zone in the source of Lantsang, Yellow and Yangtse River[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 34(4): 95-101. | |
| [40] | 卫佩茹, 2020. 环青海湖地区表层土壤中重金属污染研究[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学. |
| WEI P R, 2020. Heavy metal pollution in surface soil around Qinghai Lake[D]. Xi’an: Shaanxi Normal University. | |
| [41] | 夏子书, 白一茹, 王幼奇, 等, 2022. 基于PMF模型的宁南山区小流域土壤重金属空间分布及来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 43(1): 432-441. |
| XIA Z S, BAI Y R, WANG Y Q, et al., 2022. Spatial distribution and source analysis of soil heavy metals in a small watershed in the mountainous area of southern Ningxia based on PMF model[J]. Environmental Science, 43(1): 432-441. | |
| [42] | 王佟, 章梅, 徐辉, 等, 2022. 青海木里煤田聚乎更矿区土壤肥力及重金属风险评价[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 52(4): 113-120. |
| WANG T, ZHANG M, XU H, et al., 2022. Soil fertility and heavy metal risk assessment in Jvhugeng mining area, Muli Coalfield, Qinghai Province[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 50(4): 113-120. | |
| [43] | 王平, 曹军骥, 吴枫, 2010. 青海湖流域表层土壤环境背景值及其影响因素[J]. 地球环境学报, 1(3): 189-200. |
| WANG P, CAO J J, WU F, 2010. Environmental background values and its impact factors of topsoils within the Lake Qinghai catchment, northeast Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Earth Environment, 1(3): 189-200. | |
| [44] | 王伟鹏, 卢宏玮, 冯三三, 2020. 西藏一江两河流域中部地区土壤重金属生态风险评价[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 37(6): 970-980. |
| WANG W P, LÜ H W, FENG S S, 2020. Ecological risk assessment of soil heavy metals in the middle of the “One River and Two Tributaries” Basin in Tibet[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 37(6): 970-980. | |
| [45] |
杨灵玉, 高小红, 张威, 等, 2016. 基于Hyperion影像植被光谱的土壤重金属含量空间分布反演——以青海省玉树县为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 27(6): 1775-1784.
DOI |
|
YANG L Y, GAO X H, ZHANG W, et al., 2016. Estimating heavy metal concentrations in topsoil from vegetation reflectance spectra of Hyperion images: A case study of Yushu County, Qinghai, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 27(6): 1775-1784.
DOI |
|
| [46] | 杨安, 王艺涵, 胡健, 等, 2020. 青藏高原表土重金属污染评价与来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 41(2): 886-894. |
| YANG A, WANG Y H, HU J, et al., 2020. Evaluation and source of heavy metal pollution in surface soil of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Environmental Science, 41(2): 886-894. | |
| [47] | 张威, 高小红, 杨扬, 等, 2014. 基于光谱分析的土壤重金属含量估算研究——以三江源区玉树县和玛多县为例[J]. 土壤, 46(6): 1052-1060. |
| ZHANG W, GAO X H, YANG Y, et al., 2014. Estimating heavy metal contents for topsoil based on spectral analysis: A case study of Yushu and Maduo Counties in the Three-River Source Region[J]. Soils, 46(6): 1052-1060. | |
| [48] | 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2018. 土壤质量总汞、总砷、总铅的测定原子荧光法第1部分: 土壤中总汞的测定: GB/T 22105.1—2008[S]. |
| General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China, 2018. Atomic fluorescence method for the determination of total mercury, total arsenic and total lead in soil Part 1: Determination of total mercury in soil: GB/T 22105. 1—2008[S]. | |
| [49] |
周会程, 周恒, 肖海龙, 等, 2020. 三江源区不同退化梯度高寒草原土壤重金属含量及其与养分和酶活性的变化特征[J]. 草地学报, 28(3): 784-792.
DOI |
| ZHOU H C, ZHOU H, XIAO H L, et al., 2020. The Variation characteristics of heavy metal content, nutrient and enzyme activity in soil of alpine steppe with different degradation gradient in the Three River-Headwaters Region[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 28(3): 784-792. |
| [1] | ZHANG Chuanhua, LIU Li, DAI Jie, LI Manman, ZHANG Fengtai, DENG Ling. Classification and Risk Management of Cultivated Land Environmental Quality Based on Evaluation of Soil Heavy Metal Pollution and Accumulation [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(2): 311-320. |
| [2] | LIANG Yadi, YAO Xuewen, LI Hanbo, CHEN Zhihuai, LI Hongbo, OUYANG Minghan, LUO Xiaosan. The Content Characteristics, Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessments of Heavy Metals in Typical Tire Wear Particles (TWPs) [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(11): 1770-1777. |
| [3] | GAO Wenming, SONG Qian, ZHANG Haoxiang, WANG Shiru. Selection of Priority Conservation Areas Based on Ecosystem Service Functions and Wildlife Habitat Suitability Evaluation: A Case Study in the Sanjiang-yuan Region [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(8): 1318-1328. |
| [4] | LU Ruilin, CAO Fang, LIN Yuqi, WU Changliu, ZHANG Yanlin. Size Distribution and Source Apportionment of Chemical Compositions in Nanjing Atmospheric Particulate Matter [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(7): 1079-1088. |
| [5] | GAO Wenming, SONG Qian, ZHANG Haoxiang, WANG Shiru. Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Changes and Driving Factors of Ecological Vulnerability in Sanjiangyuan Region [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(10): 1648-1660. |
| [6] | CHEN Dongdong, HUO Lili, ZHAO Liang, CHEN Xin, SHU Min, HE Fuquan, ZHANG Yukun, ZHANG Li, LI Qi. Contribution of Water and Heat Factors to Spatial Variability of Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen in Qinghai Alpine Grassland: Based on Enhanced Regression Tree Model [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(7): 1207-1217. |
| [7] | FENG Shuna, LÜ Jialong, HE Hailong. Effect of KI Leaching on the Hg (Ⅱ) Removal of Loess Soil and the Physicochemical Properties of the Soil [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(4): 776-783. |
| [8] | MA Chuang, WANG Yuyang, ZHOU Tong, WU Longhua. Enrichment Characteristics and Desorption Behavior of Cadmium and Zinc in Particulate Organic Matter of Polluted Soil [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 31(9): 1892-1900. |
| [9] | GUO Lifang, YANG Rui, SUN Weimin. Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria Isolation from Mine Tailings and Their Plant Growth Promoting Properties [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 31(11): 2180-2188. |
| [10] | XING Shuwen, XU Jiamin, HUANG Bin, GAO Jingting, HAN Li. Effect of Heavy Metal Pollution on the Community Structure and Diversity of Soil Animals in Tea Garden Located in A Tungsten Mining Area [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 30(9): 1903-1915. |
| [11] | NIU Xuekui, WU Xueyong, WANG Wei, AI Zhimin, WANG Shuting, HOU Juan, ZHOU Tao. Study on Enrichment Characteristics of Heavy Metals from Dominant Plants Around the Waste Slag Yard of Lead Smelting in A Typical Blast Furnace [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 30(6): 1293-1298. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn