Ecology and Environment ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 1148-1157.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.06.005
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Rui1(), ZHANG Xinping1,2,*(
), DAI Junjie1, LUO Zidong1, HE Xinguang1,2, GUAN Huade3
Received:
2020-12-15
Online:
2021-06-18
Published:
2021-09-10
Contact:
ZHANG Xinping
王锐1(), 章新平1,2,*(
), 戴军杰1, 罗紫东1, 贺新光1,2, 关华德3
通讯作者:
章新平
作者简介:
王锐(1995年生),男,硕士研究生,主要从事植被与生态水文研究。E-mail: 2869299935@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
WANG Rui, ZHANG Xinping, DAI Junjie, LUO Zidong, HE Xinguang, GUAN Huade. Characteristics of Water Stable Isotopes in Soil-plant-atmosphere Continuum (SPAC) in the Needle-leaf and Broad-leaf Mixed Forest in Subtropical Region[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(6): 1148-1157.
王锐, 章新平, 戴军杰, 罗紫东, 贺新光, 关华德. 亚热带针阔混交林土壤-植物-大气连续体(SPAC)中水稳定同位素特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(6): 1148-1157.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.06.005
时间 Date | 降水 Precipitation | 土壤水 Soil water | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | n | SW0‒10 cm | SW10‒20 cm | SW20‒60 cm | SW60‒100 cm | n | |||
湿润期 (10月至次年6月) | 2017 | -6.69±3.45 | 50 | -4.64±2.43 | -5.22±1.39 | -6.49±1.20 | -7.96±1.49 | 7 | |
2017—2018 | -5.29±2.74 | 64 | -6.48±2.65 | -7.09±2.46 | -7.72±1.03 | -7.28±0.68 | 20 | ||
2018—2019 | -4.81±2.46 | 126 | -5.44±1.87 | -6.26±1.85 | -7.16±1.63 | -7.64±1.20 | 16 | ||
干旱期 (7—9月) | 2017 | -10.38±2.35 | 13 | -10.19±1.02 | -10.44±0.76 | -8.47±0.98 | -6.77±0.55 | 8 | |
2018 | -8.93±2.06 | 21 | -8.27±0.90 | -8.68±0.74 | -7.97±0.70 | -7.90±0.36 | 6 | ||
2019 | -8.64±2.19 | 10 | -7.14±1.35 | -8.26±1.06 | -7.51±1.22 | -6.38±0.91 | 8 |
Table 1 δ18O in precipitation (P) and soil water (SW) in wet and dry periods ‰
时间 Date | 降水 Precipitation | 土壤水 Soil water | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | n | SW0‒10 cm | SW10‒20 cm | SW20‒60 cm | SW60‒100 cm | n | |||
湿润期 (10月至次年6月) | 2017 | -6.69±3.45 | 50 | -4.64±2.43 | -5.22±1.39 | -6.49±1.20 | -7.96±1.49 | 7 | |
2017—2018 | -5.29±2.74 | 64 | -6.48±2.65 | -7.09±2.46 | -7.72±1.03 | -7.28±0.68 | 20 | ||
2018—2019 | -4.81±2.46 | 126 | -5.44±1.87 | -6.26±1.85 | -7.16±1.63 | -7.64±1.20 | 16 | ||
干旱期 (7—9月) | 2017 | -10.38±2.35 | 13 | -10.19±1.02 | -10.44±0.76 | -8.47±0.98 | -6.77±0.55 | 8 | |
2018 | -8.93±2.06 | 21 | -8.27±0.90 | -8.68±0.74 | -7.97±0.70 | -7.90±0.36 | 6 | ||
2019 | -8.64±2.19 | 10 | -7.14±1.35 | -8.26±1.06 | -7.51±1.22 | -6.38±0.91 | 8 |
时间 Date | 樟树 C. camphora | 刺杉 C. lanceolata | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 (LW) δ18O | 茎杆 (XW) δ18O | Δ18OL | n | 叶片 (LW) δ18O | 茎杆 (XW) δ18O | Δ18OL | n | |||
湿润期 (10月至次年6月) | 2017 | 8.54±8.66 | -4.59±0.43 | 13.13±8.71 | 7 | |||||
2017—2018 | 7.99±6.46 | -6.99±1.49 | 14.97±5.74 | 20 | ||||||
2018—2019 | 7.46±5.47 | -5.66±1.54 | 13.12±5.47 | 16 | 8.68±5.39 | -5.72±1.36 | 14.41±5.10 | 15 | ||
干旱期 (7—9月) | 2017 | 3.83±4.51 | -7.84±0.85 | 11.68±4.28 | 8 | |||||
2018 | 4.60±3.48 | -7.39±0.58 | 11.98±3.98 | 6 | ||||||
2019 | 5.14±5.16 | -6.34±0.37 | 11.48±5.13 | 8 | 7.46±3.24 | -5.73±0.73 | 13.19±3.14 | 8 |
Table 2 δ18O in xylem water, δ18O and Δ18OL in leaf water of C. camphora and C. lanceolata in dry and wet periods ‰
时间 Date | 樟树 C. camphora | 刺杉 C. lanceolata | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 (LW) δ18O | 茎杆 (XW) δ18O | Δ18OL | n | 叶片 (LW) δ18O | 茎杆 (XW) δ18O | Δ18OL | n | |||
湿润期 (10月至次年6月) | 2017 | 8.54±8.66 | -4.59±0.43 | 13.13±8.71 | 7 | |||||
2017—2018 | 7.99±6.46 | -6.99±1.49 | 14.97±5.74 | 20 | ||||||
2018—2019 | 7.46±5.47 | -5.66±1.54 | 13.12±5.47 | 16 | 8.68±5.39 | -5.72±1.36 | 14.41±5.10 | 15 | ||
干旱期 (7—9月) | 2017 | 3.83±4.51 | -7.84±0.85 | 11.68±4.28 | 8 | |||||
2018 | 4.60±3.48 | -7.39±0.58 | 11.98±3.98 | 6 | ||||||
2019 | 5.14±5.16 | -6.34±0.37 | 11.48±5.13 | 8 | 7.46±3.24 | -5.73±0.73 | 13.19±3.14 | 8 |
时间 Date | 樟树 C. camphora | 刺杉 C. lanceolata | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水线方程 Water line (LWL) | n | 水线方 Water line (LWL) | n | |||
季节变化 Seasonal variation | 湿润期 (10月至次年6月) | δD=3.06δ18O-21.74 | 43 | δD=2.44δ18O-14.17 | 15 | |
干旱期 (7—9月) | δD=3.26δ18O-39.70 | 22 | δD=2.61δ18O-27.72 | 8 | ||
日内变化 Daily variation | 湿润期典型晴日 (2019-05-23—2019-05-24) | δD=1.05δ18O+17.24 | 12 | δD=2.17δ18O+1.03 | 12 | |
干旱期典型晴日 (2019-08-28—2019-08-29) | δD=1.94δ18O-29.48 | 12 | δD=2.44δ18O-27.71 | 12 |
Table 3 Leaf water line (LWL) of C. camphora and C. lanceolata on different time scales
时间 Date | 樟树 C. camphora | 刺杉 C. lanceolata | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水线方程 Water line (LWL) | n | 水线方 Water line (LWL) | n | |||
季节变化 Seasonal variation | 湿润期 (10月至次年6月) | δD=3.06δ18O-21.74 | 43 | δD=2.44δ18O-14.17 | 15 | |
干旱期 (7—9月) | δD=3.26δ18O-39.70 | 22 | δD=2.61δ18O-27.72 | 8 | ||
日内变化 Daily variation | 湿润期典型晴日 (2019-05-23—2019-05-24) | δD=1.05δ18O+17.24 | 12 | δD=2.17δ18O+1.03 | 12 | |
干旱期典型晴日 (2019-08-28—2019-08-29) | δD=1.94δ18O-29.48 | 12 | δD=2.44δ18O-27.71 | 12 |
Fig. 4 Hourly variation of δ18O in xylem water (XW) and leaf water (LW) of C. camphora and C. lanceolata on typical sunny days during wet and dry periods (a) Shows typical sunny day in wet period (2019-05-23?2019-05-24); (b) Shows typical sunny day in dry period (2019-08-28?2019-08-29)
项目 Item | 时间 Date | 树种 Plant species | n | T/℃ | RH/% | RS/(W∙m-2) | VPD/kPa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
季节变化 Seasonal variation | 湿润期 (10月至次年6月) | 樟树 C. camphora | 43 | 0.09 | -0.84** | 0.64** | 0.55** |
刺杉 C. lanceolata | 15 | 0.41 | -0.80** | 0.66** | 0.59* | ||
干旱期 (7—9月) | 樟树 C. camphora | 22 | 0.42 | -0.63** | 0.42 | 0.66** | |
刺杉 C. lanceolata | 8 | 0.34 | -0.84** | 0.65 | 0.81* | ||
日内变化 Daily variation | 湿润期典型晴日 (2019-05-23—2019-05-24) | 樟树 C. camphora | 12 | 0.71** | -0.76** | 0.37 | 0.77** |
刺杉 C. lanceolata | 12 | 0.70* | -0.72** | 0.40 | 0.74** | ||
干旱期典型晴日 (2019-08-28—2019-08-29) | 樟树 C. camphora | 12 | 0.70* | -0.73** | 0.40 | 0.76** | |
刺杉 C. lanceolata | 12 | 0.64* | 0.66* | 0.17 | 0.66* |
Table 4 Correlation between leaf water Δ18OL and meteorological factors of C. camphora and C. lanceolata in different time scales
项目 Item | 时间 Date | 树种 Plant species | n | T/℃ | RH/% | RS/(W∙m-2) | VPD/kPa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
季节变化 Seasonal variation | 湿润期 (10月至次年6月) | 樟树 C. camphora | 43 | 0.09 | -0.84** | 0.64** | 0.55** |
刺杉 C. lanceolata | 15 | 0.41 | -0.80** | 0.66** | 0.59* | ||
干旱期 (7—9月) | 樟树 C. camphora | 22 | 0.42 | -0.63** | 0.42 | 0.66** | |
刺杉 C. lanceolata | 8 | 0.34 | -0.84** | 0.65 | 0.81* | ||
日内变化 Daily variation | 湿润期典型晴日 (2019-05-23—2019-05-24) | 樟树 C. camphora | 12 | 0.71** | -0.76** | 0.37 | 0.77** |
刺杉 C. lanceolata | 12 | 0.70* | -0.72** | 0.40 | 0.74** | ||
干旱期典型晴日 (2019-08-28—2019-08-29) | 樟树 C. camphora | 12 | 0.70* | -0.73** | 0.40 | 0.76** | |
刺杉 C. lanceolata | 12 | 0.64* | 0.66* | 0.17 | 0.66* |
[1] |
BRUNEL J, WALKER G R, KENNETT-SMITH A K, 1995. Field validation of isotopic procedures for determining sources of water used by plants in a semi-arid environment[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 167(1): 351-368.
DOI URL |
[2] |
BUTT S, ALI M, FAZIL M, et al., 2010. Seasonal variations in the isotopic composition of leaf and stem water from an arid region of Southeast Asia[J]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55(5): 844-848.
DOI URL |
[3] | BARBOUR M M, SCHURR U, HENRY B K, et al., 2000. Variation in the oxygen isotope ratio of phloem sap sucrose from castor bean[J]. Evidence in support of the Péclet effect. Plant Physiology, 123(2): 671-679. |
[4] | CHE C W, ZHANG M J, ARGIRIOU A A, et al., 2019. The stable isotopic composition of different water bodies at the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum (SPAC) of the western Loess Plateau, China[J]. Water (Basel), 11(9): 1742. |
[5] | CRAIG H, GORDON L, 1961. Isotopic variations in meteoric water[J]. Science, 133: 351-368. |
[6] |
DAI J J, ZHANG X P, LUO Z D, et al., 2020. Variation of the stable isotopes of water in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum of a Cinnamomum camphora woodland in the East Asian monsoon region[J]. Journal of Hydrology, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125199.
DOI |
[7] |
DAWSON T E, MAMBELLI S, PLAMBOECK A H, et al., 2002. Stable isotopes in plant ecology[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33: 507-559.
DOI URL |
[8] | DONGMANN G, NURNBERG H W, FORSTEL H, et al., 1974. On the enrichment of H218O in the leaves of transpiring plant[J]. Radiation and Environmental, 11(1): 41-52. |
[9] |
EHLERINGER J R, DAWSON T E, 1992. Water uptake by plants: perspectives from stable isotope composition[J]. Plant, Cell and Environment, 15(9): 1073-1082.
DOI URL |
[10] |
FARQUHAR G D, GAN K S, 2003. On the progressive enrichment of the oxygen isotopic composition of water along a leaf[J]. Plant Cell Environment, 26(6): 801-819.
DOI URL |
[11] |
GUY R D, FOGEL M L, BERRY J A, 1993. Photosynthetic fractionation of the stable isotopes of oxygen and carbon[J]. Plant Physiology, 101(1): 37-47.
DOI URL |
[12] | HUA M Q, ZHANG X P, YAO T C, et al., 2019. Dual effects of precipitation and evaporation on lake water stable isotope composition in the monsoon region[J]. Hydrological Processes, 33(16): 2192-2205. |
[13] |
LAI C T, OMETTO J P H B, BERRY J A, et al., 2008. Life form-specific variations in leaf water oxygen-18 enrichment in Amazonian vegetation[J]. Oecologia, 157(2): 197-210.
DOI URL |
[14] |
LUO Z D, GUAN H D, ZHANG X P, et al., 2019. Examination of the ecohydrological separation hypothesis in a humid subtropical area: Comparison of three methods[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 571: 642-650.
DOI URL |
[15] |
ROBERTSON J A, GAZIS C A, 2006. An oxygen isotope study of seasonal trends in soil water fluxes at two sites along a climate gradient in Washington state (USA)[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 328(1-2): 375-387.
DOI URL |
[16] |
SNYER K A, MONNAR R, POULSON S R, et al., 2010. Diurnal variations of needle water isotopic ratios in two pine species[J]. Trees, 24(3): 585-595.
DOI URL |
[17] |
STAHL C, HERAULT B, ROSSI V, et al., 2013. Depth of soil water uptake by tropical rainforest trees during dry periods: does tree dimension matter?[J]. Oecologia, 173(4): 1191-1201.
DOI URL |
[18] |
YAKIR D, DENIRO M J, GAT J R, 1990. Natural deuterium and oxygen-18 enrichment in leaf water of cotton plants grown under wet and dry conditions: Evidence for water compartmentation and its dynamics[J]. Cell and Environment, 13(1): 49-56.
DOI URL |
[19] | YANG B, WEN X F, SUN X M, et al., 2015. Irrigation depth far exceeds water uptake depth in an oasis cropland in the middle reaches of Heihe River Basin[J]. Scientific Reports, 5(5): 289-296. |
[20] | YEPEZ E A, WILLIAMS D G, SCOTT R L, et al., 2003. Partitioning overstory and understory evapotranspiration in a semiarid savanna woodland from the isotopic composition[J]. Agricultural and Foerst Meteorology, 119(1-2): 53-68. |
[21] | 党宏忠, 却晓娥, 冯金超, 等, 2020. 土壤水分对黄土区苹果园土壤-植物-大气连续体 (SPAC) 中水势梯度的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 31(3): 829-836. |
DANG H Z, QUE X E, FENG J C, et al., 2020. Effect of soil moisture on water poyenial gradients in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum (SPAC) of apple orchards in the Loess Plateau, Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31(3): 829-836. | |
[22] | 邓文平, 章洁, 张志坚, 等, 2017. 北京土石山区水分在土壤-植物-大气连续体(SPAC)中的稳定同位素特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 28(7): 2171-2178. |
DENG W P, ZHANG J, ZHANG Z J, et al., 2017. Stable hydrogen and oxygen isotope compositions in soil-plant-atmosphere continuum (SPAC) in rocky mountain area of Beijing, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 28(7): 2171-2178. | |
[23] | 黄一民, 章新平, 唐方丽, 等, 2013. 长沙大气降水中稳定同位素变化及过量氘指示水汽来源[J]. 自然资源学报, 28(11): 1945-1954. |
HUANG Y M, ZHANG X P, TANG F L, et al., 2013. Variations of precipitation stable isotope and vapor origins revealed by deuterium excess in Changsha[J]. Journal of Nature Resource, 28(11): 1946-1954. | |
[24] | 李龙, 唐常源, 曹英杰, 2020. 亚热带地区常绿阔叶林SPAC系统水分的氢氧稳定同位素特征[J/OL]. 应用生态学报, 31(9): 2875-2884. |
LI L, TANG C Y, CAO Y J, 2020. Hydrogen and oxygen stable isotope characteristics of water in SPAC system of evergreen broad-leaved forest in subtropical region[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31(9): 2875-2884. | |
[25] | 刘文茹, 彭新华, 沈业杰, 等, 2013. 激光同位素分析仪测定液态水的氢氧同位素及其光谱污染修正[J]. 生态学杂志, 32(5): 1181-1186. |
LIU W R, PENG X H, SHEN Y J, et al., 2013. Measurements of hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in liquid water by isotope ratio infrared spectroscopy (IRIS) and their spectral contamination corrections[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 32(5): 1181-1186. | |
[26] | 刘仲藜, 章新平, 黎祖贤, 等, 2020. 洞庭湖流域近58年季节性干旱时空分布及大气环流分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 29(6): 1432-1444. |
LIU Z L, ZHANG X P, LI Z X, et al., 2020. Analysis on spatial- temporal distribution and atmospheric circulation of seasonal droughts in the Dongting lake basin in recent 58 years[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 29(6): 1432-1444. | |
[27] | 娄源海, 余新晓, 邓文平, 等, 2016. 北京山区三种植物叶片水δ18O特征及影响因子[J]. 生态学杂志, 35(5): 1240-1247. |
LOU H Y, YU X X, DENG W P, et al., 2016. Leaf water δ18O characteristics and impact factors of three plants in Beijing mountainous area[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 35(5): 1240-1247. | |
[28] | 罗紫东, 关华德, 章新平, 等, 2016. 亚热带樟树树干液流通量变化规律[J]. 热带地理, 36(4): 658-665. |
LUO Z D, GUAN H D, ZHANG X P, et al., 2016. Sap flow characteristics of Cinnamomum camphora, a subtropical evergreen tree species[J]. Tropical Geography, 36(4): 658-665. | |
[29] | 罗伦, 余武生, 万诗敏, 等, 2013. 植物叶片水稳定同位素研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 33(4): 1031-1041. |
LUO L, YU W S, WAN S M, et al., 2013. Advances in the study of stable isotope composition of leaf water in plants[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(4): 1031-1041.
DOI URL |
|
[30] | 王锐, 章新平, 戴军杰, 等, 2020a. 亚热带典型植物水分利用来源变化的水稳定同位素分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 34(1): 202-209. |
WANG R, ZHANG X P, DAI J J, et al., 2020a. Variation in water uptake sources of typical plants in subtropical area based on stable isotope measurements[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 34(1): 202-209. | |
[31] | 王锐, 章新平, 戴军杰, 等, 2020b. 亚热带地区不同林分下植物水分利用的季节差异[J]. 生态环境学报, 29(4): 665-675. |
WANG R, ZHANG X P, DAI J J, et al., 2020b. Seasonal differences in water-uptake pattern of plants under different forest types in subtropical regions[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 29(4): 665-675. | |
[32] |
王小婷, 温学发, 2016. 黑河中游春玉米叶片水δD和δ18O的富集过程和影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 40(9): 912-924.
DOI |
WANG X T, WEN X F, 2016. Leaf water δD and δ18O enrichment process and influencing factors in spring maize (Zea mays) grown in the middle reaches of Heihe River Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 40(9): 912-924.
DOI URL |
|
[33] | 王文, 许志丽, 蔡晓军, 等, 2016. 基于PDSI的长江中下游地区干旱分布特征[J]. 高原气象, 35(3): 693-707. |
WANG W, XU Z L, CAI X J, et al., 2016. Aridity characteristic in middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River area based on Palmer drought severity index analysis[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 35(3): 693-707. | |
[34] |
温学发, 张世春, 孙晓敏, 等, 2008. 叶片水H218O富集的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 32(4): 961-966.
DOI |
WEN X F, ZHANG S C, SUN X M, et al., 2008. Recent advances in H218O enrichment in leaf water[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 32(4): 961-966. | |
[35] | 吴华武, 章新平, 关华德, 等, 2012. 不同水汽来源对湖南长沙地区降水中δD、δ18O的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 27(8): 1404-1414. |
WU H W, ZHANG X P, GUAN H D, et al., 2012. Influences of different moisture sources on δD and δ18O in Precipitation in Changsha, Hunan Province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 27(8): 1404-1414. | |
[36] | 章新平, 关华德, 张新主, 等, 2015. 季风区长沙站大气水汽和降水中δ18O的模拟[J]. 冰川冻土, 37(1): 249-257. |
ZHANG X P, GUAN H D, ZHANG X Z, et al., 2015. Simulation of δ18O in atmospheric vapour and precipitation in Changsha Station, East Asian monsoon region[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 37(1): 249-257. | |
[37] | 周盼盼, 张明军, 王圣杰, 等, 2016. 兰州城区绿化植物稳定氢氧同位素特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 35(11): 2942-2951. |
ZHOU P P, ZHANG M J, WANG S J, et al., 2016. The characteristics of stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopes of greening plants in Lanzhou downtown[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 35(11): 2942-2951. | |
[38] | 周慧, 章新平, 姚天次, 等, 2018. 我国大气降水中δ18O变化的多气象因子分析及分区研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 38(6): 2242-2252. |
ZHOU H, ZHANG X P, YAO T C, et al., 2018. Analysis on the impacts of multiple meteorological factors on precipitation δ18O and its regionalization in China[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 38(6): 2242-2252. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn