Ecology and Environmental Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 793-804.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.05.012
• Research Article [Environmental Science] • Previous Articles Next Articles
SHI Hongfei1(
), HOU Guangliang1,2,*(
), CAO Mingzhu1, GUAN Jiameng1, HE Jiahao1, TANG Zhonghua1, MA Shuguang1
Received:2025-09-12
Revised:2026-01-21
Accepted:2026-03-06
Online:2026-05-18
Published:2026-05-08
石洪飞1(
), 侯光良1,2,*(
), 曹明珠1, 关佳萌1, 何家豪1, 唐中华1, 马曙光1
通讯作者:
*E-mail: 作者简介:石洪飞(2001年生),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为全球变化与人类适应。E-mail: 2058057578@qq.com
基金资助:CLC Number:
SHI Hongfei, HOU Guangliang, CAO Mingzhu, GUAN Jiameng, HE Jiahao, TANG Zhonghua, MA Shuguang. Water Conservation in the Three-River Headwaters Region of the Yellow River: Spatiotemporal Changes and Driving Forces Using the InVEST Model[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(5): 793-804.
石洪飞, 侯光良, 曹明珠, 关佳萌, 何家豪, 唐中华, 马曙光. 基于InVEST模型的三江源黄河流域水源涵养时空演变与驱动机制[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(5): 793-804.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.05.012
| 数据名称 | 内容 | 格式 | 时间序列 | 来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEM | 三江源黄河流域高程 | 栅格 (30 m) | - | 地理空间数据云(www.gscloud.cn) |
| 土地利用类型 | 包括:耕地、林地、草地、水域、 建设用地、未利用土地 | 2000-2020 | 中科院_30m_LUCC-土地利用数据集 | |
| 年降水量 | 年降水量 | 栅格 (1 km) | 国家青藏高原科学数据中心( | |
| TEM | 年均气温 | |||
| ETP | 年潜在蒸散量 | |||
| 土壤数据 | 厚度及沙粒、粉沙粒、黏粒、土壤有机质含量 | - | 世界土壤数据库(HWSD) | |
| 植被可利用含水量 | 植被可利用含水率 | 栅格 (30 m) | - | 利用SPAW软件计算 |
| 土壤饱和导水率 | 各个土壤组成的饱和导水率 | - | 根据SPAW软件计算 | |
| Z系数 | 模型系数(取值为1-30) | - | - | 通过手动多次调整Zhang系数,评估系数调整前后产水系数和区域产水系数的差异,确定Zhang系数为4.9 |
| 生物系数表 | 包含最大根系深度(root_depth)、土地利用/覆被类型植被蒸散系数(Kc)、土地利用类型代码(Lucode)和土地利用类型名称(LULC_desc) | - | - | 通过参考前人研究成果(谷丰等, |
| 流域系数 | 各土地利用的流域系数 | - | - | 联合国粮农组织提出的作物参考数据和相关文献确定(傅斌等, |
| 水文数据 | 流域水资源产水系数 | 统计数据 | 2000-2020 | 水利部黄河水利委员会获取( |
Table 1 Data source
| 数据名称 | 内容 | 格式 | 时间序列 | 来源 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEM | 三江源黄河流域高程 | 栅格 (30 m) | - | 地理空间数据云(www.gscloud.cn) |
| 土地利用类型 | 包括:耕地、林地、草地、水域、 建设用地、未利用土地 | 2000-2020 | 中科院_30m_LUCC-土地利用数据集 | |
| 年降水量 | 年降水量 | 栅格 (1 km) | 国家青藏高原科学数据中心( | |
| TEM | 年均气温 | |||
| ETP | 年潜在蒸散量 | |||
| 土壤数据 | 厚度及沙粒、粉沙粒、黏粒、土壤有机质含量 | - | 世界土壤数据库(HWSD) | |
| 植被可利用含水量 | 植被可利用含水率 | 栅格 (30 m) | - | 利用SPAW软件计算 |
| 土壤饱和导水率 | 各个土壤组成的饱和导水率 | - | 根据SPAW软件计算 | |
| Z系数 | 模型系数(取值为1-30) | - | - | 通过手动多次调整Zhang系数,评估系数调整前后产水系数和区域产水系数的差异,确定Zhang系数为4.9 |
| 生物系数表 | 包含最大根系深度(root_depth)、土地利用/覆被类型植被蒸散系数(Kc)、土地利用类型代码(Lucode)和土地利用类型名称(LULC_desc) | - | - | 通过参考前人研究成果(谷丰等, |
| 流域系数 | 各土地利用的流域系数 | - | - | 联合国粮农组织提出的作物参考数据和相关文献确定(傅斌等, |
| 水文数据 | 流域水资源产水系数 | 统计数据 | 2000-2020 | 水利部黄河水利委员会获取( |
| 年份 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 实际产水系数 | 28.1 | 41.4 | 29.9 | 26.5 | 38.5 |
| 模型产水系数 | 30.6 | 39.1 | 29.7 | 26.6 | 33.3 |
| 误差 | 2.5 | −2.3 | −0.2 | 0.1 | −5.2 |
Table 2 Comparison of actual water yield coefficient and simulated water yield coefficient from 2000 to 2020 %
| 年份 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 实际产水系数 | 28.1 | 41.4 | 29.9 | 26.5 | 38.5 |
| 模型产水系数 | 30.6 | 39.1 | 29.7 | 26.6 | 33.3 |
| 误差 | 2.5 | −2.3 | −0.2 | 0.1 | −5.2 |
| 年份 | 多年平均 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年均产水深度/mm | 138.26 | 121.77 | 187.48 | 130.62 | 103.61 | 147.81 |
| 相对变化/% | 0 | −11.9 | 35.6 | −5.5 | −25.1 | 6.91 |
| 年均降水/mm | 429.05 | 397.39 | 478.53 | 437.64 | 391.18 | 440.51 |
| 降水距平/% | 0 | −7.4 | 11.5 | 2.0 | −8.8 | 2.7 |
| 类型 | 平水年 | 平水年 | 丰水年 | 平水年 | 枯水年 | 平水年 |
Table 3 Annual average variation of water production depth
| 年份 | 多年平均 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年均产水深度/mm | 138.26 | 121.77 | 187.48 | 130.62 | 103.61 | 147.81 |
| 相对变化/% | 0 | −11.9 | 35.6 | −5.5 | −25.1 | 6.91 |
| 年均降水/mm | 429.05 | 397.39 | 478.53 | 437.64 | 391.18 | 440.51 |
| 降水距平/% | 0 | −7.4 | 11.5 | 2.0 | −8.8 | 2.7 |
| 类型 | 平水年 | 平水年 | 丰水年 | 平水年 | 枯水年 | 平水年 |
| 参数 | Ksat | T | V | 扰动度/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均水源涵养能力变化/% | 10.0% | 0.0% | −8.8% | +10.0% |
| −10.0% | −0.1% | 6.1% | −10.0% | |
| 29.9% | 0.0% | −22.2% | +30.0% | |
| −30.0% | −7.9% | 23.3% | −30.0% |
Table 4 Results of sensitivity analysis on model parameters
| 参数 | Ksat | T | V | 扰动度/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均水源涵养能力变化/% | 10.0% | 0.0% | −8.8% | +10.0% |
| −10.0% | −0.1% | 6.1% | −10.0% | |
| 29.9% | 0.0% | −22.2% | +30.0% | |
| −30.0% | −7.9% | 23.3% | −30.0% |
| 因子 | 降水量 | TEM | ETP | DEM | 坡度 | 土地利用 | 格网(像元) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 单因子 q值 | 0.603 | 0.163 | 0.170 | 0.191 | 0.129 | 0.246 | 250×250 |
| 0.601 | 0.167 | 0.170 | 0.197 | 0.125 | 0.247 | 200×200 | |
| 0.607 | 0.171 | 0.178 | 0.191 | 0.129 | 0.240 | 150×150 |
Table 5 Results of sensitivity analysis on grids
| 因子 | 降水量 | TEM | ETP | DEM | 坡度 | 土地利用 | 格网(像元) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 单因子 q值 | 0.603 | 0.163 | 0.170 | 0.191 | 0.129 | 0.246 | 250×250 |
| 0.601 | 0.167 | 0.170 | 0.197 | 0.125 | 0.247 | 200×200 | |
| 0.607 | 0.171 | 0.178 | 0.191 | 0.129 | 0.240 | 150×150 |
| 因子 | 降水量 | TEM | ETP | DEM | 坡度 | 土地利用 | 自然间断法分层 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 单因子 q值 | 0.607 | 0.163 | 0.172 | 0.195 | 0.121 | 0.244 | 9 |
| 0.598 | 0.150 | 0.159 | 0.181 | 0.116 | 0.244 | 6 | |
| 0.588 | 0.141 | 0.157 | 0.158 | 0.113 | 0.244 | 5 |
Table 6 Results of sensitivity analysis on the number of natural break layers
| 因子 | 降水量 | TEM | ETP | DEM | 坡度 | 土地利用 | 自然间断法分层 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 单因子 q值 | 0.607 | 0.163 | 0.172 | 0.195 | 0.121 | 0.244 | 9 |
| 0.598 | 0.150 | 0.159 | 0.181 | 0.116 | 0.244 | 6 | |
| 0.588 | 0.141 | 0.157 | 0.158 | 0.113 | 0.244 | 5 |
| 参数 | Z | p | Sen’s斜率 | 显著性检验水平α |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 水源涵养量M-K检验值 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 1.86 | 0.05 |
| 年均水源涵养能力 M-K检验值 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.992 | 0.05 |
Table 7 Results of the Mann-Kendall test
| 参数 | Z | p | Sen’s斜率 | 显著性检验水平α |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 水源涵养量M-K检验值 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 1.86 | 0.05 |
| 年均水源涵养能力 M-K检验值 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.992 | 0.05 |
| 参数 | 耕地 (n=5) | 林地 (n=5) | 草地 (n=5) | 水域 (n=5) | 建设用地 (n=5) | 未利用地 (n=5) | Kruskal-Wallis 检验统计量H值 | p | ȵ2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 多年平均水源涵养能力 | 1.90 | 19.6 | 9.85 | 0.04 | 3.37 | 7.03 | 27.9 | 0.000*** | 0.961 |
Table 8 Results of the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test analysis
| 参数 | 耕地 (n=5) | 林地 (n=5) | 草地 (n=5) | 水域 (n=5) | 建设用地 (n=5) | 未利用地 (n=5) | Kruskal-Wallis 检验统计量H值 | p | ȵ2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 多年平均水源涵养能力 | 1.90 | 19.6 | 9.85 | 0.04 | 3.37 | 7.03 | 27.9 | 0.000*** | 0.961 |
| 年代 | 坡度 | DEM | 土地利用 | 降水量 | TEM | ETP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0.123 | 0.171 | 0.195 | 0.643 | 0.148 | 0.161 |
| 2005 | 0.118 | 0.194 | 0.303 | 0.548 | 0.146 | 0.164 |
| 2010 | 0.116 | 0.216 | 0.257 | 0.579 | 0.171 | 0.179 |
| 2015 | 0.129 | 0.186 | 0.212 | 0.614 | 0.169 | 0.168 |
| 2020 | 0.121 | 0.195 | 0.254 | 0.653 | 0.179 | 0.187 |
Table 9 Results of single factor detection on water conservation capacity in the Yellow River Basin of the Three-River Headwaters Region
| 年代 | 坡度 | DEM | 土地利用 | 降水量 | TEM | ETP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0.123 | 0.171 | 0.195 | 0.643 | 0.148 | 0.161 |
| 2005 | 0.118 | 0.194 | 0.303 | 0.548 | 0.146 | 0.164 |
| 2010 | 0.116 | 0.216 | 0.257 | 0.579 | 0.171 | 0.179 |
| 2015 | 0.129 | 0.186 | 0.212 | 0.614 | 0.169 | 0.168 |
| 2020 | 0.121 | 0.195 | 0.254 | 0.653 | 0.179 | 0.187 |
| [1] |
CHEN Q R, XU X, WU M Y, et al., 2022. Assessing the Water Conservation Function Based on the InVEST Model: Taking Poyang Lake Region as an Example[J]. Land, 11(12): 22-28.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
COSBY B J, HORNBERGER G M, CLAPP R B, et al., 1984. A statistical exploration of the relationships of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils[J]. Water Resources Research, 20(6): 682-690.
DOI URL |
| [3] | COHEN J, 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences[M]. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
| [4] |
DIVINSKY I, BECKER N, BAR P, 2017. Ecosystem service tradeoff between grazing intensity and other services: A case study in Karei-Deshe experimental cattle range in northern Israel[J]. Ecosystem Services, 24: 16-27.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
FABER J H, VAN W J, 2012. Elaborations on the use of the ecosystem services concept for application in ecological risk assessment for soils[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 415(2): 3-8.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
GUNTON R M, ASPEREN E N, ELINE N, et al., 2017. Beyond ecosystem services: Valuing the invaluable[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 32(4): 249-257.
DOI URL |
| [7] | HELSEL D R, HIRSCH R M, 2002. Statistical Methods in Water Resources[M]. Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey. |
| [8] | REDHEAD J W, STRATFORD C, SHARPS K, et al., 2016. Empirical validation of the InVEST water yield ecosystem service model at a national scale[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 569: 1418-1426. |
| [9] |
WANG J F, ZHANG T L, FU B J, 2016. A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity[J]. Ecological Indicators, 67: 250-256.
DOI URL |
| [10] | ZHANG L, HICKEL K, DAWES W R, et al., 2004. A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration[J]. Water Resources Research, 40(2): 1-14. |
| [11] | 曹巍, 刘璐璐, 吴丹, 等, 2019. 三江源国家公园生态功能时空分异特征及其重要性辨识[J]. 生态学报, 39(4): 1361-1374. |
| CAO W, LIU L L, WU D, et al., 2019. Spatial and temporal variations and the importance of hierarchy of ecosystem functions in the Three-river-source National Park[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(4): 1361-1374. | |
| [12] | 陈长征, 甘容, 杨峰, 等, 2022. 基于SWAT的径流模拟参数优化方案及不确定性分析[J]. 人民长江, 53(7): 82-89. |
| CHEN C Z, GAN R, YANG F, et al., 2022. Parameters optimization scheme and uncertainty analysis of runoff simulation based on SWAT model[J]. Yangtze River, 53(7): 82-89. | |
| [13] |
陈万旭, 李江风, 朱丽君, 2019. 长江中游地区生态系统服务价值空间分异及敏感性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 34(2): 325-337.
DOI |
|
CHEN W X, LI J F, ZHU L J, 2019. Spatial heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis of ecosystem services value in the Middle Yangtze River region[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(2): 325-337.
DOI URL |
|
| [14] |
方露露, 许德华, 王伦澈, 等, 2021. 长江、黄河流域生态系统服务变化及权衡协同关系研究[J]. 地理研究, 40(3): 821-838.
DOI |
| FANG L L, XU D H, WANG L C, et al., 2021. The study of ecosystem services and the comparison of trade-off and synergy in Yangtze River Basin and Yellow River Basin[J]. Geographical Research, 40(3): 821-838. | |
| [15] | 傅斌, 徐佩, 王玉宽, 等, 2013. 都江堰市水源涵养功能空间格局[J]. 生态学报, 33(3): 126-134. |
| FU B, XU P, WANG Y K, et al., 2013. Spatial pattern of water retetnion in Dujiangyan County[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(3): 126-134. | |
| [16] | 龚诗涵, 肖洋, 郑华, 等, 2017. 中国生态系统水源涵养空间特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 37(7): 2455-2462. |
| GONG S H, XIAO Y, ZHENG H, et al., 2017. Spatial patterns of ecosystem water conservation in China and its impact factors analysis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(7): 2455-2462. | |
| [17] | 谷丰, 王恒, 任春坪, 等, 2025. 基于InVEST模型的黄河流域四川段水源涵养功能时空变化[J/OL]. 草业科学. [2025-05-03]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1069.S.20250410.1000.004.html. |
| GU F, WANG H, REN C P, et al., 2025. Temporal and spatial changes of water conservation function in Sichuan section of the Yellow River Basin based on InVEST model[J/OL]. Pratacultural Science. [2025-05-03]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1069.S.20250410.1000.004.html. | |
| [18] | 韩朝辉, 朱一龙, 徐多勋, 等, 2025. 基于InVEST模型的汉江流域陕西段丰、枯水年水源涵养功能评价[J/OL]. 中国地质, [2025-05-03]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1167.P.20250415.1712.013.html. |
| HAN C H, ZHU Y L, XU D X, et al., 2025. Evaluation of water conservation function in wet and dry years in Shaanxi section of Han River Basin based on InVEST model[J/OL]. Geology in China, [2025-05-03]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1167.P.20250415.1712.013.html. | |
| [19] | 何秋琴, 王京伟, 毕旭, 等, 2024. 2005-2020年山西省水源涵养功能时空格局及其演变驱动力分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 37(4): 862-873. |
| HE Q Q, WANG J W, BI X, et al., 2024. Temporal and spatial dynamics of water conservation in Shanxi province (2005-2020): Patterns and influence analysis[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 37(4): 862-873. | |
| [20] |
蓝永超, 鲁承阳, 喇承芳, 等, 2013. 黄河源区气候向暖湿转变的观测事实及其水文响应[J]. 冰川冻土, 35(4): 920-928.
DOI |
| LAN Y C, LU C Y, LA C F, et al., 2013. The fact of climate shift to warm-humid in the source regions of the Yellow River and its hydrologic response[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 35(4): 920-928. | |
| [21] |
李乃强, 徐贵阳, 2020. 基于自然间断点分级法的土地利用数据网格化分析[J]. 测绘通报 (4): 106-110, 156.
DOI |
|
LI N Q, XU G Y, 2020. Grid analysis of land use based on natural breaks (jenks) classification[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping (4): 106-110, 156.
DOI |
|
| [22] | 吕明轩, 张红, 贺桂珍, 等, 2024. 黄河流域水源涵养服务功能动态演变及驱动因素[J]. 生态学报, 44(7): 2761-2771. |
| LÜ M X, ZHANG H, HE G Z, et al., 2024. Dynamic evolution and driving factors of water conservation service function in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44(7): 2761-2771. | |
| [23] | 毛娜, 黄来明, 邵明安, 2019. 黄土区坡面尺度不同植被类型土壤饱和导水率坡面分布及影响因素[J]. 土壤, 51(2): 381-389. |
| MAO N, HUANG L M, SHAO M A, 2019. Profile distribution of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and controlling factors under different vegetations on slope in Loess Region[J]. Soils, 51(2): 381-389. | |
| [24] | 秦甲, 施发祥, 崔峻豪, 等, 2025. 黄河源区冻土变化对流域地表径流和水源涵养量的影响[J]. 水利水运工程学报 (2): 1-11. |
| QIN J, SHI F X, CUI J H, et al., 2025. The impact of permafrost changes in the Yellow River source region on surface runoff and water conservation capacity[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering (2): 1-11. | |
| [25] | 司梦可, 曹建生, 阳辉, 2019. 微地形变化对地表水文过程影响的研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 27(10): 1587-1595. |
| SI M K, CAO J S, YANG H, 2019. Advances in research on the effects of micro-topography changes on surface hydrological proc-esses[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 27(10): 1587-1595. | |
| [26] | 石培礼, 李文华, 2001. 森林植被变化对水文过程和径流的影响效应[J]. 自然资源学报, 16(5): 481-487. |
|
SHI P L, LI W H, 2001. Influence of forest cover change on hydrological process and watershed runoff[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 16(5): 481-487.
DOI |
|
| [27] |
孙文义, 邵全琴, 刘纪远, 2014. 黄土高原不同生态系统水土保持服务功能评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 29(3): 365-376.
DOI |
| SUM W Y, SHAO Q Q, LIU J Y, 2014. Assessment of soil conservation function of the ecosystem services on the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 29(3): 365-376. | |
| [28] | 田世民, 韩冰, 梁帅, 等, 2022. 黄河源区水源涵养有关问题探讨[J]. 水利水运工程学报 (1): 19-27. |
| TIAN S M, HAN B, LIANG S, et al., 2022. Discussion on water conservation capacity in the source area of the Yellow River[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering (1): 19-27. | |
| [29] |
王劲峰, 徐成东, 2017. 地理探测器:原理与展望[J]. 地理学报, 72(1): 116-134.
DOI |
|
WANG J F, XU C D, 2017. Geodetector: Principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(1): 116-134.
DOI |
|
| [30] | 王乐, 刘德地, 李天元, 等, 2015. 基于多变量M-K检验的北江流域降水趋势分析[J]. 水文, 35(4): 85-90. |
| WANG L, LUI D D, LI T Y, et al., 2015. Trend analysis of precipitation in Beijiang River Basin based on multivariate Mann-Kendall test[J]. Journal of China Hydrology, 35(4): 85-90. | |
| [31] | 王绍业, 倪用鑫, 彭华, 等, 2023. 近20年延河流域生长季产水系数时空变化特征及影响因素[J]. 水土保持研究, 30(3): 423-429. |
| WANG S Y, NI Y X, PENG H, et al., 2023. Analysis on the temporal and spatial variation characteristics and influencing factors of water yield coefficient in the growth season of Yanhe River basin in the past 20 years[J]. Research of Soil and water Conservation, 30(3): 423-429. | |
| [32] | 王亚迪, 权全, 薛涛涛, 等, 2018. 气候变化对黄河源区的水文影响分析[J]. 水资源研究, 7(2): 135-143. |
|
WANG Y D, QUAN Q, XUE T T, et al., 2018. Hydrological impact of climate change on the source region of the Yellow River[J]. Journal of Water Resources Research, 7(2): 135-143.
DOI URL |
|
| [33] |
王亚慧, 戴尔阜, 马良, 等, 2020. 横断山区产水量时空分布格局及影响因素研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 35(2): 371-386.
DOI |
|
WANG Y H, DAI E F, MA L, et al., 2020. Spatiotemporal and influencing factors analysis of water yield in the Hengduan Mountain region[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 35(2): 371-386.
DOI URL |
|
| [34] | 谢展, 李萍, 刘文倩, 等, 2024. 气候变化和植被恢复对黄土高原水源涵养功能时空变化的影响[J]. 生态学报, 44(23): 10915-10935. |
| XIE Z, LI P, LIU W Q, et al., 2024. Spatial and temporal changes in water conservation in the Loess Plateau under the influence of climate change and vegetation restoration[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44(23): 10915-10935. | |
| [35] |
杨洁, 谢保鹏, 张德罡, 2020. 基于InVEST模型的黄河流域产水量时空变化及其对降水和土地利用变化的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 31(8): 2731-2739.
DOI |
|
YANG J, XIE B P, ZHANG D G, et al., 2020. Spatio-temporal variation of water yield and its response to precipitation and land use change in the Yellow River Basin based on InVEST model[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31(8): 2731-2739.
DOI |
|
| [36] | 张彪, 李文华, 谢高地, 等, 2009. 森林生态系统的水源涵养功能及其计量方法[J]. 生态学杂志, 28(3): 529-534. |
| ZHANG B, LI W H, XIE G D, et al., 2009. Water conservation function and its measurement methods of forest ecosystem[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 28(3): 529-534. | |
| [37] | 张晨钰, 张攀, 王伟, 等, 2024. 基于多参数优化地理探测器的山洪灾害驱动力分析及风险评价[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 55(6): 1-15. |
| ZHANG C Y, ZHANG P, WANG W, et al., 2024. Driving force analysis and risk assessment of flash flood disaster based on multi-parameter optimized geographic detector[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 55(6): 1-15. | |
| [38] | 张福平, 李肖娟, 冯起, 等, 2018. 基于InVEST模型的黑河流域上游水源涵养量[J]. 中国沙漠, 38(6): 1321-1329. |
| ZHANG F P, LI X J, FENG Q, et al., 2018. Spatial and temporal variation of water conservation in the upper reaches of Heihe River basin based on InVEST model[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 38(6): 1321-1329. | |
| [39] | 张书齐, 左其亭, 巴音吉, 等, 2025. 伊洛河流域水源涵养能力时空变化及驱动因素分析[J]. 人民黄河, 47(6): 69-75. |
| ZHANG S Q, ZUO Q T, BA Y J, et al., 2025. Analysis of spatial-temporal changes and driving factors of water conservation capacity in the Yiluo River basin[J]. Yellow River, 47(6): 69-75. | |
| [40] | 赵亚茹, 周俊菊, 雷莉, 等, 2019. 基于InVEST模型的石羊河上游产水量驱动因素识别[J]. 生态学杂志, 38(12): 3789-3799. |
| ZHAO Y R, ZHOU J J, LEI L, et al., 2019. Identification of drivers for water yield in the upstream of Shiyang River based on InVEST model[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 38(12): 3789-3799. | |
| [41] | 张志强, 余新晓, 赵玉涛, 等, 2003. 森林对水文过程影响研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 14(1): 113-116. |
| ZHANG Z Q, YU X X, ZHAO Y T, et al., 2003. Advance in researches on the effect of forest on hydrological process[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 14(1): 113-116. | |
| [42] | 郑子彦, 吕美霞, 马柱国, 2020. 黄河源区气候水文和植被覆盖变化及面临问题的对策建议[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 35(1): 61-72. |
| ZHENG Z Y, LÜ M X, MA Z G, 2020. Climate, hydrology, and vegetation coverage changes in source region of Yellow River and countermeasures for challenges[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 35(1): 61-72. | |
| [43] | 左其亭, 王娇阳, 杨峰, 等, 2022. 水源涵养相关概念辨析及水源涵养能力计算方法[ J]. 水利水电科技进展, 42(2): 13-19. |
| ZUO Q T, WANG J Y, YANG F, et al., 2022. Concept analysis of water conservation and calculation methods of water conservation capacity[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 42(2): 13-19. |
| [1] | WEN Shaoqiang, HU Baoqing, BAO Ting, XIE Weiwei, LAO Yinyin, GAO Jinsong. Research on the Synergistic Path of Optimisation of Territorial Spatial Functions and Carbon Emissions Reduction: Analysis of Decoupling Effect Based on Pinglu Canal Economic Belt [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(5): 725-737. |
| [2] | FU Zhihua, ZHANG Hanwei, WANG Jing. Spatial Heterogeneous Driving Effects of Multi-dimensional Land Use Transition on Ecosystem Services in Mining Areas of Shandong Province [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(4): 563-574. |
| [3] | ZHOU Zhiluo, YANG Qiu, LIU Xiaohuang, LIU Run, LIU Jiufen, MA Min, ZHU Ping, LI Chaozhu. Spatio-temporal Distribution Changes and Coupling Coordination Analysis of the “Production-Living-Ecological Space” at the Township Scale on Hainan Island [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(4): 654-664. |
| [4] | WANG Yue, YU Fudong, ZHANG Yue, XIANG Hengxing, YAN Hengqi, MAO Dehua. Multi-scenario Simulation of Landscape Pattern and Carbon Storage Changes in Northeast Black Soil Region Based on the PLUS-InVEST Model [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(2): 178-189. |
| [5] | TANG Shulan, ZHANG Minxi. Land Use Classification and Carbon Storage Estimation Based on GF-1 Multi-scale Features and Sentinel-1 Structural Features [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(2): 190-198. |
| [6] | HOU Huimin, LI Haohao, WANG Hui, WANG Pengquan, BAO Zhiqiang, REN Zhiwei. Assessment and Future Scenario Prediction of Nitrogen Retention Function in the Shiyang River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(2): 232-244. |
| [7] | WEN Yujing, LI Ni. Spatiotemporal Differentiation and Zoning of Carbon Storage in Hilly Areas Based on Topographic Gradients: Take Chang-Zhu-Tan Urban Agglomeration As an Example [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(9): 1373-1385. |
| [8] | LIANG Qiuyan, SONG Mingjie, ZHANG Dou, LI Shicheng. Prediction of Land Use in Kunming in 2030 and 2050 Incorporating Ecological Security Pattern [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(9): 1463-1472. |
| [9] | WANG Tianwen, LUO Mingliang, BAI Leichao. Dynamic Changes and Trade-off-Synergy Analysis of Ecosystem Services in the Jialing River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(6): 888-901. |
| [10] | ZHAO Zhixuan, WEI Fangfei, WU Haotian, WANG Yining, WANG Pengzhe. The Response of Ecological Service Value to Land Use Change in Lancang-Mekong River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(5): 688-698. |
| [11] | ZHANG Hongbo, YIN Ban, LI Chunyong, CUI Songyun, HE Yan, LI Xiaohong, DENG Lixian. Characteristics and Drivers of the Dynamic Evolution of Water Conservation Function in the Honghe River Basin (China Section) in the Last 40 Years [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(4): 556-569. |
| [12] | LI Man, WU Dongli, HE Hao, YU Huijie, ZHAO Lin, LIU Cong, HU Zhenghua, LI Qi. Spatio-temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Carbon Storage in the Yellow River Basin from 1990 to 2020 [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(3): 333-344. |
| [13] | SHEN Jialong, WU Lihong, LI Linshuang, ZHOU Yuanfang, YANG Xiaomin. Effects of Land Uses on Soil Organic Carbon Fractions and Their Carbon Sequestration in a Typical Karst Small Mountain Watershed [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(3): 358-367. |
| [14] | ZHOU Lele, WAN Xia, DING Liming, WEI Xingyu, WANG Jianping, CHEN Jing, LI Xin, FAN Min, LI Meng, YU Xiaobin. Study on the Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Carbon Emission-Sequestration and Carbon Supply-demand Ratio in Sichuan Province [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(3): 368-379. |
| [15] | ZHANG Renfei, XIAO Meng, LIU Zhicheng. Spatio-temporal Heterogeneity and Driving Factors of Landscape Fragmentation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(3): 461-473. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn