Ecology and Environment ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1785-1793.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.10.007
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Yanchu1(), WANG Fei2, WU Dan2, HUANG Xin1,3, CHEN Jialin1, ZHOU Linpu1, KONG Fanqing1,*(
)
Received:
2023-08-08
Online:
2023-10-18
Published:
2024-01-16
Contact:
KONG Fanqing
赵燕楚1(), 王菲2, 吴丹2, 黄鑫1,3, 陈佳林1, 周琳普1, 孔凡青1,*(
)
通讯作者:
孔凡青
作者简介:
赵燕楚(1992年生),女,工程师,博士,从事水生态监测与评价工作。E-mail: z18306421151@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHAO Yanchu, WANG Fei, WU Dan, HUANG Xin, CHEN Jialin, ZHOU Linpu, KONG Fanqing. Health Assessment of Haihe River Basin Based on Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(10): 1785-1793.
赵燕楚, 王菲, 吴丹, 黄鑫, 陈佳林, 周琳普, 孔凡青. 海河流域河流大型底栖动物生物完整性指数健康评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(10): 1785-1793.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.10.007
指标类型 | 序号 | 生物指标 | 对干扰的反应 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 最大值 | 最小值 | 25%分位值 | 中位数 | 75%分位值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
群落丰富度 | M1 | 总分类单元数 | 减小 | 14 | 3.65 | 21 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 15 |
M2 | 密度/(ind∙m−2) | 减小 | 418 | 368 | 1376 | 129 | 162 | 304 | 413 | |
M3 | EPT分类单元数 | 减小 | 2.11 | 2.02 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
M4 | 摇蚊科分类单元数 | 增大 | 4.33 | 1.41 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | |
M5 | 端足目和软体动物的分类单元数 | 减小 | 1.44 | 1.71 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
M6 | 双翅目分类单元数 | 减小 | 5.11 | 1.66 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
个体数量 比例 | M7 | 摇蚊科个体相对丰度 | 增大 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.77 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.27 | 0.46 |
M8 | 优势分类单元个体相对丰度 | 增大 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.78 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.40 | |
M9 | 前三位优势分类单元个体相对丰度 | 增大 | 0.63 | 0.17 | 0.86 | 0.40 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.84 | |
生物耐污 能力 | M10 | 敏感类群的分类单元数 | 减小 | 1.44 | 1.17 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
M11 | 中间类群的个体相对丰度 | 变化 | 0.64 | 0.17 | 0.88 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.69 | 0.76 | |
M12 | 耐污类群的个体相对丰度 | 增大 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 0.59 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.31 | 0.34 | |
M13 | BI值 | 增大 | 6.01 | 1.16 | 7.66 | 3.74 | 5.41 | 5.68 | 6.53 | |
M14 | BMWP值 | 减小 | 55.6 | 24.9 | 112 | 32 | 38 | 48 | 58 | |
M15 | ASPT | 减小 | 5.29 | 0.79 | 6.59 | 4.45 | 4.70 | 4.80 | 6.00 | |
营养级组成 | M16 | 捕食者个体相对丰度 | 减小 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.45 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.21 |
M17 | 撕食者+刮食者个体相对丰度 | 减小 | 0.41 | 0.27 | 0.84 | 0 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.58 | |
多样性 | M18 | Shannon-Wiener指数 | 减小 | 2.79 | 0.71 | 3.75 | 1.46 | 2.41 | 3.09 | 3.24 |
M19 | Margalef指数 | 减小 | 2.24 | 0.47 | 3.15 | 1.65 | 1.99 | 2.11 | 2.56 | |
M20 | Pielou指数 | 减小 | 0.74 | 0.19 | 0.94 | 0.42 | 0.55 | 0.84 | 0.88 | |
M21 | Simpson指数 | 减小 | 0.76 | 0.18 | 0.91 | 0.39 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
Table 1 Candidate metrics of B-IBI in Haihe River Basin and distribution in reference sites
指标类型 | 序号 | 生物指标 | 对干扰的反应 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 最大值 | 最小值 | 25%分位值 | 中位数 | 75%分位值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
群落丰富度 | M1 | 总分类单元数 | 减小 | 14 | 3.65 | 21 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 15 |
M2 | 密度/(ind∙m−2) | 减小 | 418 | 368 | 1376 | 129 | 162 | 304 | 413 | |
M3 | EPT分类单元数 | 减小 | 2.11 | 2.02 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
M4 | 摇蚊科分类单元数 | 增大 | 4.33 | 1.41 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | |
M5 | 端足目和软体动物的分类单元数 | 减小 | 1.44 | 1.71 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
M6 | 双翅目分类单元数 | 减小 | 5.11 | 1.66 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
个体数量 比例 | M7 | 摇蚊科个体相对丰度 | 增大 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.77 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.27 | 0.46 |
M8 | 优势分类单元个体相对丰度 | 增大 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.78 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.40 | |
M9 | 前三位优势分类单元个体相对丰度 | 增大 | 0.63 | 0.17 | 0.86 | 0.40 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.84 | |
生物耐污 能力 | M10 | 敏感类群的分类单元数 | 减小 | 1.44 | 1.17 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
M11 | 中间类群的个体相对丰度 | 变化 | 0.64 | 0.17 | 0.88 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.69 | 0.76 | |
M12 | 耐污类群的个体相对丰度 | 增大 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 0.59 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.31 | 0.34 | |
M13 | BI值 | 增大 | 6.01 | 1.16 | 7.66 | 3.74 | 5.41 | 5.68 | 6.53 | |
M14 | BMWP值 | 减小 | 55.6 | 24.9 | 112 | 32 | 38 | 48 | 58 | |
M15 | ASPT | 减小 | 5.29 | 0.79 | 6.59 | 4.45 | 4.70 | 4.80 | 6.00 | |
营养级组成 | M16 | 捕食者个体相对丰度 | 减小 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.45 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.21 |
M17 | 撕食者+刮食者个体相对丰度 | 减小 | 0.41 | 0.27 | 0.84 | 0 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.58 | |
多样性 | M18 | Shannon-Wiener指数 | 减小 | 2.79 | 0.71 | 3.75 | 1.46 | 2.41 | 3.09 | 3.24 |
M19 | Margalef指数 | 减小 | 2.24 | 0.47 | 3.15 | 1.65 | 1.99 | 2.11 | 2.56 | |
M20 | Pielou指数 | 减小 | 0.74 | 0.19 | 0.94 | 0.42 | 0.55 | 0.84 | 0.88 | |
M21 | Simpson指数 | 减小 | 0.76 | 0.18 | 0.91 | 0.39 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
编号 | M1 | M8 | M14 | M15 | M18 | M21 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | 1 | |||||
M8 | −0.528 | 1 | ||||
M14 | 0.873 | −0.320 | 1 | |||
M15 | 0.522 | −0.261 | 0.707 | 1 | ||
M18 | 0.743 | −0.921 | 0.511 | 0.332 | 1 | |
M21 | 0.589 | −0.965 | 0.383 | 0.285 | 0.953 | 1 |
Table 2 Pearson correlation analysis of 6 candidate metrics
编号 | M1 | M8 | M14 | M15 | M18 | M21 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | 1 | |||||
M8 | −0.528 | 1 | ||||
M14 | 0.873 | −0.320 | 1 | |||
M15 | 0.522 | −0.261 | 0.707 | 1 | ||
M18 | 0.743 | −0.921 | 0.511 | 0.332 | 1 | |
M21 | 0.589 | −0.965 | 0.383 | 0.285 | 0.953 | 1 |
序号 | 计算公式 |
---|---|
M1 | M1/20.10 |
M15 | M15/6.51 |
M18 | M18/3.63 |
Table 3 Calculation formula of core parameters
序号 | 计算公式 |
---|---|
M1 | M1/20.10 |
M15 | M15/6.51 |
M18 | M18/3.63 |
健康评价等级 | 评分标准 |
---|---|
健康 | >2.14 |
良好 | 1.61‒2.14 |
一般 | 1.08‒1.61 |
较差 | 0.55‒1.08 |
很差 | 0.55< |
Table 4 Criteria of B-IBI in Haihe River Basin
健康评价等级 | 评分标准 |
---|---|
健康 | >2.14 |
良好 | 1.61‒2.14 |
一般 | 1.08‒1.61 |
较差 | 0.55‒1.08 |
很差 | 0.55< |
[1] |
BARBOUR M T, GERRITSEN J, GRIFFITH G E, et al., 1996. A framework for biological criteria for Florida streams using benthic macroinvertebrates[J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 15(2): 185-211.
DOI URL |
[2] |
BECK M W, HATCH L K, VONDRACEK B, et al., 2010. Development of a macrophyte-based index of biotic integrity for Minnesota lakes[J]. Ecological Indicators, 10(5): 968-979.
DOI URL |
[3] |
CHI S Y, GONG Y T, WANG H J, et al., 2017. A pilot macroinvertebrate- based multimetric index (MMI-CS) for assessing the ecological status of the Chishui River basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 83: 84-95.
DOI URL |
[4] |
HUANG Q, GAO J F, CAI Y J, et al., 2014. Development and application of benthic macroinvertebrate-based multimetric indices for the assessment of streams and rivers in the Taihu Basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 48: 649-659.
DOI URL |
[5] |
HELSON J E, WILLIAMS D D, 2013. Development of a macroinvertebrate multimetric index for the assessment of low-land streams in the neotropics[J]. Ecological Indicators, 29: 167-178.
DOI URL |
[6] |
KARR J R, 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities[J]. Fisheries, 6(6): 21-27.
DOI URL |
[7] |
KERANS B L, KARR J R, 1994. A benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for rivers of the Tennessee Valley[J]. Ecological Applications, 4(4): 768-785.
DOI URL |
[8] |
MAXTED J R, BARBOUR M T, GERRITSEN J, et al., 2000. Assessment framework for mid-Atlantic coastal plain streams using benthic macroinvertebrates[J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 19(1): 128-144.
DOI URL |
[9] | MCNAUGHTON S J, 1967. Relationships among functional properties of Californian grassland[J]. Nature, 216: 168-169. |
[10] |
MERETA S T, BOETS P, MEESTER L D, et al., 2013. Development of a multimetric index based on benthic macroinvertebrates for the assessment of natural wetlands in Southwest Ethiopia[J]. Ecological Indicators, 29: 510-521.
DOI URL |
[11] | MORSE J C, YANG L F, TIAN L X, 1994. Aquatic insects of China useful for monitoring water quality[M]. Nanjing: Hohai University Press: 1-570. |
[12] |
WEIGEL B M, HENNE L J, MARTÍNEZ-RIVERA L M, 2002. Macroinvertebrate-based index of biotic integrity for protection of streams in west-central Mexico[J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 21(4): 686-700.
DOI URL |
[13] |
WHITTIER T R, STODDARD J L, LARSEN D P, et al., 2007. Selecting reference sites for stream biological assessments: best professional judgment or objective criteria[J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 26(2): 349-360.
DOI URL |
[14] |
WU N C, SCHMALZ B, FOHRER N, 2012. Development and testing of a phytoplankton index of biotic integrity (P-IBI) for a German lowland river[J]. Ecological Indicators, 13(1): 158-167.
DOI URL |
[15] | 崔文彦, 孟宪智, 张世禄, 等, 2019. 大型底栖动物完整性指数在漳河上游水生态评价中的应用[J]. 生物学杂志, 36(5): 73-77. |
CUI W Y, MENG X Z, ZHANG S L, et al., 2019. Application of benthic index of biotic integrity for aquatic ecological assessment in the upper reaches of Zhanghe River[J]. Journal of Biology, 36(5): 73-77. | |
[16] | 邓明星, 黄亮亮, 莫苑敏, 等, 2018. 应用鱼类生物完整性指数评价荔浦河河流健康[J]. 生态毒理学报, 13(4): 111-119. |
DENG M X, HUANG L L, MO Y M, et al., 2018. River health assessment using biotic integrity index based on fish for Lipu River[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 13(4): 111-119. | |
[17] |
付岚, 江源, 刘琦, 等, 2018. 基于大型底栖动物完整性指数B-IBI的东江流域水生态健康评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 27(8): 1502-1511.
DOI |
FU L, JIANG Y, LIU Q, et al., 2018. Eco-health assessment of Dongjiang River Basin based on index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) of macroinvertebrates[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 27(8): 1502-1511. | |
[18] | 国家环境保护总局, 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 2002. 地表水环境质量标准: GB 3838—2002[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社: 2-3. |
State Environmental Protection Administration of China, State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of China, 2002. Environmental Quality Standard for Surface Water: GB 3838—2002[S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press: 2-3. | |
[19] | 国家环境保护总局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会, 2002. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 第4版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版集团: 1-830. |
Editorial board of State Environmental Protection Administration of China for Water and Wastewater Monitoring and Analysis Methods, 2002. Water and Wastewater Monitoring and Analysis Methods[M]. 4th edition. Beijing: China Environmental Publishing Group: 1-830. | |
[20] | 郝利霞, 孙然好, 陈利顶, 2014. 海河流域河流生态系统健康评价[J]. 环境科学, 35(10): 3692-3701. |
HAO L X, SUN R H, CHEN L D, 2014. Health assessment of river ecosystem in Haihe River Basin, China[J]. Environmental Science, 35(10): 3692-3701. | |
[21] | 黄彬彬, 李光锦, 丰茂成, 等, 2020. 基于底栖动物生物完整性指数的赣江干流健康评价[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 31(5): 30-36. |
HUANG B B, LI G J, FENG M C, et al., 2020. Health assessment of Ganjiang River mainstream based on B-IBI[J]. Journal of Water Resources & Water Engineering, 31(5): 30-36. | |
[22] |
孔凡青, 崔文彦, 周绪申, 2018. 基于大型底栖动物完整性指数 (B-IBI) 的永定河水系生态健康评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 27(3): 550-555.
DOI |
KONG F Q, CUI W Y, ZHOU X S, 2018. Health assessment on Yongding River Watershed using benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI)[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 27(3): 550-555. | |
[23] | 刘月英, 1979. 中国经济动物志-淡水软体动物[M]. 北京: 科学出版社: 1-134. |
LIU Y Y, 1979. Economic fauna of China-freshwater mollusca[M]. Beijing: Science Press: 1-134. | |
[24] | 慕林青, 张海萍, 赵树旗, 等, 2018. 永定河底栖动物生物完整性指数构建与健康评价[J]. 环境科学研究, 31(4): 697-707. |
MU L Q, ZHANG H P, ZHAO S Q, et al., 2018. River health assessment of Yongding River based on benthic integrated biotic index[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 31(4): 697-707. | |
[25] | 渠晓东, 刘志刚, 张远, 2012. 标准化方法筛选参照点构建大型底栖动物生物完整性指数[J]. 生态学报, 32(15): 4661-4672. |
QU X D, LIU Z G, ZHANG Y, 2012. Discussion on the standardized method of reference sites selection for establishing the Benthic-Index of Biotic Integrity[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(15): 4661-4672.
DOI URL |
|
[26] | 苏瑶, 许育新, 安文浩, 等, 2019. 基于微生物生物完整性指数的城市河道生态系统健康评价[J]. 环境科学, 40(3): 1270-1279. |
SU Y, XU Y X, AN W H, et al., 2019. Assessment of ecosystem health of an urban river based on the microbe index of biotic integrity (M-IBI)[J]. Environmental Science, 40(3): 1270-1279.
DOI URL |
|
[27] | 孙鹏程, 龚家国, 任政, 等, 2022. 海河流域河湖修复保护进展与展望[J]. 水利水电技术, 53(1): 135-152. |
SUN P C, GONG J G, REN Z, et al., 2022. Progress and prospect of river-lake restoration and protection in Haihe River Basin[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 53(1): 135-152. | |
[28] | 田鹏, 钱昶, 林佳宁, 等, 2019. 滦河流域大型底栖动物生物完整性指数健康评价[J]. 中国环境监测, 35(4): 50-58. |
TIAN P, QIAN C, LIN J N, et al., 2019. Study of river health assessment based on the benthic index of biological integrity in the Luanhe River Basin[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 35(4): 50-58. | |
[29] | 王备新, 杨莲芳, 刘正文, 2006. 生物完整性指数与水生态系统健康评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 25(6): 707-710. |
WANG B X, YANG L F, LIU Z W, 2006. Index of biological integrity and its application in health assessment of aquatic ecosystem[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 25(6): 707-710. | |
[30] | 王俊才, 王新华, 2011. 中国北方摇蚊幼虫[M]. 北京: 中国言实出版社:1-291. |
WANG J C, WANG X H, 2011. Larvae of chironomid in northern China[M]. Beijing: China Yanshi Press:1-291. | |
[31] | 许维, 梁舒汀, 黄艳凤, 等, 2020. 基于大型底栖动物的大清河水系水体健康状况评价[J]. 湿地科学, 18(5): 546-554. |
XU W, LIANG S T, HUANG Y F, et al., 2020. Assessment of water health status of Daqing River system base on macrobenthos[J]. Wetland Science, 18(5): 546-554. | |
[32] | 殷旭旺, 张远, 渠晓东, 等, 2011. 浑河水系着生藻类的群落结构与生物完整性[J]. 应用生态学报, 22(10): 2732-2740. |
YIN X W, ZHANG Y, QU X D, et al., 2011. Community structure and biological integrity of periphyton in Hunhe River water system of Liaoning Province, Northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 22(10): 2732-2740. | |
[33] | 游清徽, 刘玲玲, 方娜, 等, 2019. 基于大型底栖无脊椎动物完整性指数的鄱阳湖湿地生态健康评价[J]. 生态学报, 39(18): 6631-6641. |
YOU Q H, LIU L L, FANG N, et al., 2019. Assessing ecological health of Poyang Lake wetland, using benthic macroinvertebrate-based index of biotic integrity (B-IBI)[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(18): 6631-6641. | |
[34] | 张颖, 胡金, 万云, 等, 2014. 基于底栖动物完整性指数B-IBI的淮河流域水系生态健康评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 30(3): 300-305. |
ZHANG Y, HU J, WAN Y, et al., 2014. Eco-health assessment of Huaihe River System based on benthic-index of biotic integrity[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 30(3): 300-305. | |
[35] | 张宇航, 渠晓东, 王少明, 等, 2020. 浑河流域底栖动物生物完整性指数构建与健康评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 20(6): 1374-1386. |
ZHANG Y H, QU X D, WANG S M, et al., 2020. River health assessment of Hun River Basin based on benthic index of biological integrity[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 20(6): 1374-1386. | |
[36] | 张远, 徐成斌, 马溪平, 等, 2007. 辽河流域河流底栖动物完整性评价指标与标准[J]. 环境科学学报, 27(6): 919-927. |
ZHANG Y, XU C B, MA X P, et al., 2007. Biotic integrity index and criteria of benthic organizms in Liao River Basin[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 27(6): 919-927. | |
[37] | 郑丙辉, 张远, 李英博, 2007. 辽河流域河流栖息地评价指标与评价方法研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 27(6): 928-936. |
ZHENG B H, ZHANG Y, LI Y B, 2007. Study of indicators and methods for river habitat assessment of Liao River Basin[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 27(6): 928-936. | |
[38] | 周莹, 渠晓东, 赵瑞, 等, 2013. 河流健康评价中不同标准化方法的应用与比较[J]. 环境科学研究, 26(4): 410-417. |
ZHOU Y, QU X D, ZHAO R, et al., 2013. Standardized methods for selecting reference and impaired sites to evaluate river health[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 26(4): 410-417. |
[1] | SONG Simeng, LIN Dongmei, ZHOU Hengyu, LUO Zongzhi, ZHANG Lili, YI Chao, LIN Hui, LIN Xingsheng, LIU Bin, SU Dewei, ZHENG Dan, YU Shikui, LIN Zhanxi. Effects of Planting Cenchrus fungigraminus on Plant Species Diversity and Soil Physicochemical Properties in the Ulan Buh Desert [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(9): 1595-1605. |
[2] | LIANG Shuting, WANG Fei, WU Dan, ZHAO Yanchu, KONG Fanqing. Ecological Health Assessment of Reservoirs Based on Macrobenthic Index of Biotic Integrity in Haihe Basin [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(8): 1457-1464. |
[3] | LIANG Chuan, YANG Yanfang, YU Shanshan, ZHOU Li, ZHANG Jingwei, ZHANG Xiujuan. Differences of Microbial Biomass and Community Structure Characteristics in Sediments under Net-pen and Pond Fish Farming [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(8): 1487-1495. |
[4] | HOU Hui, YAN Peixuan, XIE Qinmi, ZHAO Hongliang, PANG Danbo, CHEN Lin, LI Xuebin, HU Yang, LIANG Yongliang, NI Xilu. Characterization of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Community Diversity in the Rhizosphere Soils of Prunus mongolica Scrub of Helan Mountain [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 857-865. |
[5] | JIANG Yongwei, DING Zhenjun, YUAN Junbin, ZHANG Zheng, LI Yang, WEN Qingchun, WANG Yeyao, JIN Xiaowei. Study on Benthic Macroinvertebrates Community Structure and Water Quality Evaluation in Main Rivers of Liaoning Province [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 969-979. |
[6] | WANG Yun, ZHENG Xilai, CAO Min, LI Lei, SONG Xiaoran, LIN Xiaolei, GUO Kai. Study on Denitrification Performance and Control Factors in Brackish-Freshwater Transition Zone of Coastal Aquifer [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 980-988. |
[7] | KOU Zhu, QING Chun, YUAN Changguo, LI Ping. Diversity and Distribution of Sulfur Oxidizing Bacteria in Hot Springs of Northeast Tibet, China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 989-1000. |
[8] | HU Fang, LIU Jutao, WEN Chunyun, HAN Liu, WEN Hui. Phytoplankton Community Structure and Evaluation of Aquatic Ecological Conditions in Fu River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(4): 744-755. |
[9] | YU Fei, ZENG Hailong, FANG Huaiyang, FU Lingfang, LIN Shu, DONG Jiahao. Spatio-temporal Variation Characteristics of Phytoplankton Functional Groups and Water Quality Evaluation in the Typical Tidal River Network [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(4): 756-765. |
[10] | WU Weilong, CHEN Yijie, WEI Ting, YANG Guiqiong, YANG Changhong, ZHEN Zhen, LIN Zhong. Mechanisms of Earthworm-driven Biodegradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Coastal Saline Agricultural Soils [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(11): 1996-2006. |
[11] | LIANG Chuan, YANG Yanfang, YU Shanshan, ZHOU Li, ZHANG Jingwei, ZHANG Xiujuan. Differences of Microbial Biomass and Community Structure Characteristics in Sediments under Net-pen and Pond Fish Farming [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(10): 1802-1810. |
[12] | LI Xuan, QIAN Xiuwen, HUANG Juan, WANG Mingyu, XIAO Jun. Responses of Operating Performance and Microbial Community in Constructed Wetlands to NiO NPs Exposure [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(10): 1833-1841. |
[13] | WANG Lixiao, LIU Jinxian, CHAI Baofeng. Response of Soil Bacterial Community and Nitrogen Cycle during the Natural Recovery of Abandoned Farmland in Subalpine of the North China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(8): 1537-1546. |
[14] | WANG Yingcheng, YAO Shiting, JIN Xin, YU Wenzhen, LU Guangxin, WANG Junbang. Comparative Study on Soil Bacterial Diversity of Degraded Alpine Meadow in the Sanjiangyuan Region [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(4): 695-703. |
[15] | LIU Hongmei, HAI Xiang, AN Kerui, ZHANG Haifang, WANH Hui, ZHANG Yanjun, WANG Lili, ZHANG Guilong, YANG Dianlin. Effects of Different Fertilization Regimes on Community Structure Diversity of CO2-assimilating Bacteria in Maize Field of Fluvo-aquic Soil in North China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(4): 715-722. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn