Analysis of Value Accounting and Influencing Factors of Ecological Products in Typical Rare Earth Mineral Restoration Areas

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.09.008

Ecology and Environmental Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 1412-1422.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.09.008

• Research Article [Ecology] • Previous Articles Next Articles

Analysis of Value Accounting and Influencing Factors of Ecological Products in Typical Rare Earth Mineral Restoration Areas

Hong Tuling¹^,²(), Huang Peng¹, Chen Meiqiu²^,^*(), Zuo Tengyun¹, Yang Xiongping¹, Lai Zhaohao³, Yang Fan¹

¹ Jiangxi Provincial Natural Resources Rights and Reserve Guarantee Center, Nanchang 330025, P. R. China
² Research Center on Rural Land Resources Use and Protection, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, P. R. China
³ Xihu Branch of Hangzhou Planning and Natural Resources Bureau, Hangzhou, 310013, P. R. China

Received:2025-06-10 Revised:2026-07-15 Accepted:2026-08-19 Online:2026-09-18 Published:2026-09-16

典型稀土矿修复区生态产品价值核算与影响因素研究

洪土林¹^,²(), 黄鹏¹, 陈美球²^,^*(), 左腾云¹, 杨小平¹, 赖昭豪³, 杨帆¹

¹ 江西省自然资源权益与储备保障中心，江西南昌 330025
² 江西农业大学农村土地资源利用与保护研究中心，江西南昌 330045
³ 杭州市规划和自然资源局西湖分局，浙江杭州 310013

通讯作者: *陈美球, E-mail: cmq12@263.net
作者简介:洪土林（1982年生），男，博士，研究方向为国土空间生态修复、生态产品价值实现。E-mail: tulin1112@163.com
基金资助:
江西省自然资源权益与储备保障中心课题(OYKJ2025-06)

Abstract

Abstract:

[Objective] This study aims to assess the value of ecological products in rare earth mine restoration areas, explore the factors influencing changes in ecological product value, and provide a scientific basis for optimizing mine restoration models and enhancing the value of ecological products in specific regional units undergoing rare earth mine ecological restoration. [Methods] Taking Xunwu County, Jiangxi Province, as a case study, we constructed a theoretical framework and accounting system for the value of ecological products in the rare earth mine restoration areas based on statistical and survey data from 2010, 2016 and 2022. The functional value method was used to estimate the value of ecological products in the rare earth mine restoration areas of Xunwu County and to reveal their spatiotemporal evolution characteristics, while the geographic detectors were used to analyze the influencing factors. [Results] 1) The value of ecological products varied significantly among different restoration areas. The value of ecological products in the “restoration + industry” area decreased by 11.8485 million yuan because of industrial park construction, whereas the values in the comprehensive resource utilization area and ecological greening area increased by 227.6748 million yuan and 5.0726 million yuan, respectively; 2) During the study period, the growth in ecological product value showed clear stage-specific characteristics. From 2010 to 2016, constrained by the scale of ecological restoration project implementation, the value of ecological products increased by only 12.7162 million yuan. From 2016 to 2022, the total value increased by 208.18260 million yuan, accompanied by coordinated improvements in ecological, economic, and social benefits; 3) The duration and area of ecological restoration projects were the dominant factors affecting the realization of ecological product value in rare earth mining areas, while the interaction between capital investment per unit area and ecological restoration project area was the most significant. [Conclusion] Rare earths are key strategic resources for modern industry; however, intensive mining has caused systemic ecological problems in mining areas, including forest degradation, soil erosion and microclimate deterioration. Ecological restoration in typical rare earth mining areas has significantly enhanced ecosystem service functions through comprehensive measures such as terrain consolidation, water-system management, and vegetation restoration, thereby increasing the supply capacity of ecological products. To further improve ecological governance in rare earth mining areas, a diversified mechanism for realizing the value of ecological products should be established to increase the economic value of the ecological restoration areas; nature-based solutions should be adopted to optimize restoration pathways and value-realization mechanisms; and synergies between land development and urbanization should be strengthened to promote coordinated economic and ecological development.

Key words: ecological product value, typical rare earth ore restoration area, ecological restoration, influencing factors, Xunwu County

摘要：

【目的】旨在核算稀土矿修复区生态产品价值，探究生态产品价值变化的影响因素，为优化矿区修复模式和提升稀土矿生态修复特定地域单元生态产品价值提供科学依据。【方法】以江西省寻乌县典型稀土矿修复区为研究对象，基于2010、2016和2022年统计及调研数据，构建稀土矿修复区生态产品价值核算理论框架及核算体系，采用功能价值法测度寻乌县稀土矿修复区生态产品价值，揭示其时空演化特征，并运用地理探测器剖析其影响因素。【结果】1）不同修复片区的生态产品价值量差异显著。“修复+工业”片区生态产品价值下降1.18×10³万元，而资源综合利用片区和生态复绿片区价值量分别增长了2.28×10⁴万元和5.07×10²万元；2）研究期间生态产品价值增长呈明显阶段性特征。2010－2016年受限于生态修复工程实施规模，生态产品价值仅增长1.27×10³万元；2016－2022年，价值总量增加2.08×10⁴万元，实现生态、经济和社会效益的协同提升；3）生态修复工程期限、生态修复项目面积是影响稀土矿区生态修复产品价值实现的主导因素，且单位面积资金投入与生态修复项目面积是交互作用最显著的双因子。【结论】应建立多样化生态产品价值实现机制，提升稀土矿生态修复区域的经济价值；采用基于自然的解决方案优化技术路径，建立生态产品价值实现机制；优化土地开发与城镇化驱动协同，构建经济与生态协同发展体系。

关键词: 生态产品价值, 典型稀土矿修复区, 生态修复, 影响因素, 寻乌县

CLC Number:

X196

Hong Tuling, Huang Peng, Chen Meiqiu, Zuo Tengyun, Yang Xiongping, Lai Zhaohao, Yang Fan. Analysis of Value Accounting and Influencing Factors of Ecological Products in Typical Rare Earth Mineral Restoration Areas[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(9): 1412-1422.

洪土林, 黄鹏, 陈美球, 左腾云, 杨小平, 赖昭豪, 杨帆. 典型稀土矿修复区生态产品价值核算与影响因素研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(9): 1412-1422.

Figures/Tables 9

References 34

[1]	Piao S, Ciais P, Huang Y, et al., 2010. The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China[J]. Nature, 467(7311): 43-51. DOI
[2]	WHO, UNEP, 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment[M]. Ecosystems and Human Well-being:Synthesis. Washington D C: Island Press.
[3]	Zhang T J, Zhang S Q, Cao Q, et al., 2022. The spatiotemporal dynamics of ecosystem services bundles and the social economic-ecological drivers in the Yellow River Delta region[J]. Ecological Indicators, 135: 108573. DOI URL
[4]	Chen C, Park T J, Wang X H, et al., 2019. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2: 122-129. DOI PMID
[5]	蔡晨茵, 赵立科, 徐慧, 等, 2023. 基于功能价值法的河流生态系统服务价值优化综合评估[J]. 水电能源科学, 41(9): 44-47, 35.
	Cai C Y, Zhao L K, Xu H, et al., 2023. Optimization and comprehensive evaluation of river ecosystem service value based on functional value method[J]. Water Resources and Power, 41(9): 44-47, 35.
[6]	常谕, 孙业红, 杨海龙, 等, 2023. 农户视角下农业文化遗产地生态产品的旅游价值实现路径--以广东潮州单丛茶文化系统为例[J]. 资源科学, 45(2): 428-440. DOI
	Chang Y, Sun Y H, Yang H L, et al., 2023. Value realization paths of ecological products through tourism in agricultural heritage sites from the perspective of farmers: An example of the Dancong tea culture system in Chaozhou City[J]. Resources Science, 45(2): 428-440. DOI
[7]	陈美球, 洪土林, 2020. 国土空间生态修复内涵剖析[J]. 中国土地, (6): 23-25.
	Chen M Q, Hong T L, 2020. Analysis of the connotation of ecological restoration in national land space[J]. China Land, (6): 23-25.
[8]	杜雪莲, 常滨丽, 2024. 生态产品价值实现效益评价及障碍因子分析--以喀斯特山区贵州省为例[J]. 生态经济, 40(5): 206-213, 222.
	Du X L, Chang B L, 2024. Benefit evaluation and analysis on obstacle factor of ecological product value realization: A case study of Guizhou province in karst mountains[J]. Ecological Economy, 40(5): 206-213, 222.
[9]	傅利平, 张恩泽, 黄旭, 2024. 创新资源集聚、区域协同创新与京津冀高质量发展[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 45(2): 35-50.
	Fu L P, Zhang E Z, Huang X, 2024. Innovation resource aggregation, regional collaborative innovation, and high-quality development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 45(2): 35-50.
[10]	管青春, 李慧, 樊彦国, 等, 2024. 黄河三角洲生态产品价值核算及时空变化特征分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 38(10): 137-148.
	Guan Q C, Li H, Fan Y G, et al., 2024. Value assessment and spatiotemporal variation characteristic analysis of ecological products in the Yellow River delta[J]. China Land Science, 38(10): 137-148.
[11]	郝林华, 陈尚, 何帅, 2021. 海洋供给类生态产品价值的核算方法及应用--以浙江省温州市为例[J]. 环境保护, 49(22): 54-60.
	Hao L H, Chen S, He S, 2021. Accounting method and application on the marine provisioning ecological product values: Taking Wenzhou city’s practice as an example[J]. Environmental Protection, 49(22): 54-60.
[12]	金志丰, 张晓蕾, 陈诚, 2024. 自然资源管理创新助力生态产品价值实现: 关键环节与实施路径[J]. 中国土地科学, 38(4): 1-10.
	Jin Z F, Zhang X L, Chen C, 2024. Key stages and implementation paths of ecological products value realization through natural resources management innovation[J]. China Land Science, 38(4): 1-10.
[13]	刘伯恩, 2020. 生态产品价值实现机制的内涵、分类与制度框架[J]. 环境保护, 48(13): 49-52.
	Liu B E, 2020. The connotation, classification and institutional framework of value realization mechanism of ecological products[J]. Environmental Protection, 48(13): 49-52.
[14]	吕添贵, 陈安莹, 付舒斐, 等, 2025. 农业绿色转型中国耕地系统韧性时空演化特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 45(6): 2891-2904.
	Lü T G, Chen A Y, Fu S F, et al., 2025. Spatial-temporal evolution characteristics and influencing mechanism of resilience of China’s cultivated land system under agricultural green transformation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 45(6): 2891-2904.
[15]	卢秀秀, 刘云根, 王妍, 等, 2024. 典型挺水植物应用于湿地生态修复工程污染净化效应差异性研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 46(1): 87-91, 98.
	Lu X X, Liu Y G, Wang Y, et al., 2024. Study on the difference of pollution purification effect of typical water-holding plants applied to wetland ecological restoration projects[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 46(1): 87-91, 98.
[16]	马磊, 李成, 司洪涛, 等, 2023. 矿山公园植被恢复动态监测及影响因素--以渝北铜锣山为例[J]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), 21(6): 111-120.
	Ma L, Li C, Si H T, et al., 2023. Dynamic monitoring and influencing factors of vegetation restoration on a mine park: A case study of Tongluo mountain[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 21(6): 111-120.
[17]	马鹏飞, 张安兵, 王贺封, 等, 2023. 基于改进遥感生态指数的矿区生态环境监测及驱动因素分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 39(12): 1580-1590.
	Ma P F, Zhang A B, Wang H F, et al., 2023. Ecological environment monitoring and driving factors analysis of mining area based on improved remote sensing ecological index[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 39(12): 1580-1590.
[18]	欧阳志云, 朱春全, 杨广斌, 等, 2013. 生态系统生产总值核算: 概念、核算方法与案例研究[J]. 生态学报, 33(21): 6747-6761.
	Ouyang Z Y, Zhu C Q, Yang G B, et al., 2013. Gross ecosystem product: Concept, accounting framework and case study[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(21): 6747-6761. DOI URL
[19]	任杰, 钱发军, 李双权, 等, 2022. 河南省生态产品价值核算研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 47(9): 159-164.
	Ren J, Qian F J, Li S Q, et al., 2022. Gross ecosystem product accounting for Henan province[J]. Environmental Science and Management, 47(9): 159-164.
[20]	尚晓丽, 雷海倩, 肖芷竣, 等, 2024. 生态旅游赋能矿山修复开发适宜性评价及影响因素[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 44(4): 180-188.
	Shang X L, Lei H Q, Xiao Z J, et al., 2024. Ecotourism empowers the suitability assessment and influencing factors of mine restoration and development[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 44(4): 180-188.
[21]	佘艳, 张宇佳, 张学玲, 等, 2024. 生态产品价值实现机制探索与实践--以江西省寻乌县、资溪县试点为例[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 23(6): 808-816.
	She Y, Zhang Y J, Zhang X L, et al., 2024. Exploration and practice of realization mechanism of ecological products value: A case study of the pilot work of Xunwu and Zixi county of Jiangxi province[J]. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 23(6): 808-816.
[22]	盛蓉, 2023. 中国生态产品供给效率改善的影响因素研究: 基于技术创新与制度整合双重视角[J]. 自然资源学报, 38(12): 2966-2985. DOI
	Sheng R, 2023. Efficiency of ecological products supply in China and its influencing factors from perspectives of technology innovation and institutional integration[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 38(12): 2966-2985. DOI
[23]	汤临佳, 蒋子燕, 赖惠能, 2025. 以 “政府-平台” 功能互嵌驱动脱贫地区新内源式发展的机理研究--基于江西省赣州市寻乌县案例的分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 22(2): 128-140, 174-175.
	Tang L J, Jiang Z Y, Lai H N, 2025. Research on the mechanism of the neo-endogenous development in poverty alleviated areas under the dual embedding of government-platform functions: Case study of Xunwu county, Ganzhou city, Jiangxi province, China[J]. Journal of Public Management, 22(2): 128-140, 174-175.
[24]	王骏博, 贺志斌, 冯淑芳, 等, 2024. 厦门文化服务类海洋生态产品核算研究--以休闲娱乐服务为例[J]. 应用海洋学学报, 43(4): 735-743.
	Wang J B, He Z B, Feng S F, et al., 2024. Cultural ecological product accounting in Xiamen marine ecosystem: A case of leisure and recreational services[J]. Journal of Applied Oceanography, 43(4): 735-743.
[25]	王雪融, 龚建周, 俞方圆, 2024. 粤港澳大湾区4种生态系统调节服务的互馈关系及机制[J]. 生态环境学报, 33(7): 1130-1141. DOI
	Wang X R, Gong J Z, Yu F Y, 2024. Mutual feedback relationships and mechanisms of ecosystem four regulating services in the Greater Bay Area of Guangdong, Hongkong and Macao[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 33(7): 1130-1141.
[26]	王梓辰, 孙传谆, 王超, 等, 2022. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统生产总值 (GEP) 核算研究--以清远市为例[J]. 环境科学与管理, 47(3): 148-153.
	Wang Z C, Sun C Z, Wang C, et al., 2022. Accounting for gross ecosystem product (GEP) based on a unit area value equivalent factor: Taking Qingyuan city as an example[J]. Environmental Science and Management, 47(3): 148-153.
[27]	徐彩瑶, 孔凡斌, 2024. 数字乡村建设赋能森林生态产品价值实现: 理论逻辑与实践路径[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 34(11): 163-177.
	Xu C Y, Kong F B, 2024. Theoretical logic and practical paths of digital rural construction empowering the value realization of forest ecological products[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 34(11): 163-177.
[28]	曾贤刚, 虞慧怡, 谢芳, 2014. 生态产品的概念、分类及其市场化供给机制[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 24(7): 12-17.
	Zeng X G, Yu H Y, Xie F, 2014. Concept, classification and market supply mechanism of ecological products[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 24(7): 12-17.
[29]	张广帅, 蔡悦荫, 吴婷婷, 等, 2023. 生态修复区盐地碱蓬群落碳、氮储量及其影响因素分析--以辽河三角洲大凌河口湿地为例[J]. 海洋环境科学, 42(1): 46-54.
	Zhang G S, Cai Y Y, Wu T T, et al., 2023. Study on carbon and nitrogen storage pattern of Suaeda salsa community and its influencing factors in the coastal wetland: A case study of Dalinghe estuary wetland under Liaohe River Delta[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 42(1): 46-54.
[30]	张林波, 虞慧怡, 郝超志, 等, 2021. 生态产品概念再定义及其内涵辨析[J]. 环境科学研究, 34(3): 655-660.
	Zhang L B, Yu H Y, Hao C Z, et al., 2021. Redefinition and connotation analysis of ecosystem product[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 34(3): 655-660.
[31]	张丽佳, 周妍, 2021. 建立健全生态产品价值实现机制的路径探索[J]. 生态学报, 41(19): 7893-7899.
	Zhang L J, Zhou Y, 2021. Exploring the path to establishing a sound mechanism for realizing the value of ecological products[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(19): 7893-7899.
[32]	中共中央办公厅, 国务院办公厅, 2021. 关于建立健全生态产品价值实现机制的意见[Z].
	General Office of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, General Office of the State Council, 2021. Opinions on establishing and improving the mechanism for realizing the value of ecological products[Z].
[33]	周甲男, 马苏, 郑颖娟, 等, 2023. 基于生态产品价值视角的矿区植被恢复成效评估: 以神东矿区为例[J]. 环境科学研究, 36(9): 1728-1736.
	Zhou J N, Ma S, Zheng Y J, et al., 2023. Valuation of vegetation restoration effect in mining area from the perspectiveof ecosystem product value: A case study of Shendong mining area[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 36(9): 1728-1736.
[34]	朱春雨, 李娜, 王辉, 等, 2025. 森林生态产品概念内涵演变与价值实现要点探析[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 33(5): 1024-1032.
	Zhu C Y, Li N, Wang H, et al., 2025. The conceptual connotation evolution and key points of value realization in forest ecological products[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 33(5): 1024-1032.

一级指标	二级指标	指标说明
物质供给产品	直接利用物质产品	淡水；稻米、蔬菜、水果、畜禽、水产、茶叶、中药材、油茶等农、林、牧、渔产品；制造业天然原材料；种子、苗木等遗传物质；园林树木、花卉等装饰产品
物质供给产品	间接利用物质产品	水电、沼气、秸秆发电等可再生能源
调节服务产品	水源涵养	植被水源涵养
	土壤保持	土壤保持
	洪水调蓄	森林、灌丛、草地的洪水调蓄
		湖泊等洪水调蓄
		水库的洪水调蓄
	水体净化	主要水体净化COD、氨氮、总磷等污染物
	空气净化	净化二氧化硫、氮氧化物等空气污染物
	固碳释氧	陆地生态系统固碳与释氧
	气候调节	植被蒸腾和水面蒸发
文化服务产品	景观游憩	自然景观（国家公园、自然保护区、自然公园等）、红色景区、古色景区的游憩

一级指标	二级指标	指标说明
物质供给产品	直接利用物质产品	淡水；稻米、蔬菜、水果、畜禽、水产、茶叶、中药材、油茶等农、林、牧、渔产品；制造业天然原材料；种子、苗木等遗传物质；园林树木、花卉等装饰产品
物质供给产品	间接利用物质产品	水电、沼气、秸秆发电等可再生能源
调节服务产品	水源涵养	植被水源涵养
	土壤保持	土壤保持
	洪水调蓄	森林、灌丛、草地的洪水调蓄
		湖泊等洪水调蓄
		水库的洪水调蓄
	水体净化	主要水体净化COD、氨氮、总磷等污染物
	空气净化	净化二氧化硫、氮氧化物等空气污染物
	固碳释氧	陆地生态系统固碳与释氧
	气候调节	植被蒸腾和水面蒸发
文化服务产品	景观游憩	自然景观（国家公园、自然保护区、自然公园等）、红色景区、古色景区的游憩

类别	科目	实物量指标	实物量核算方法	价值量指标	价值量核算方法
物质供给产品	农业产品	农业产品产量	统计调查法	农业产品产值	市场价值法
	林业产品	林业产品产量	统计调查法	林业产品产值	市场价值法
	畜牧业产品	畜牧业产品产量	统计调查法	畜牧业产品产值	市场价值法
	渔业产品	渔业产品产量	统计调查法	渔业产品产值	市场价值法
	生态能源	水能、风能、光伏发电量	统计调查法	生态能源产值	市场价值法
调节服务产品	水源涵养	水源涵养量	水量平衡方程	水源涵养价值	影子工程法
	土壤保持	土壤保持量	修正水土流失方程	减少泥沙淤积与面源污染价值	替代成本法（清淤、环境工程降解成本）
	洪水调蓄	洪水调蓄量	水量平衡法；水库、湖泊调蓄模型	洪水调蓄价值	影子工程法
	空气净化	二氧化硫、氮氧化物、粉尘净化量	污染物净化模型	二氧化硫、氮氧化物、粉尘治理价值	替代成本法（污染物治理成本）
	水体净化	COD、总氮、总磷净化量	污染物净化模型	COD、总氮、总磷治理价值	替代成本法（污染物治理成本）
	固碳	二氧化碳固定量	固碳机理模型	固碳价值	市场价值法
	释氧	氧气释放量	净初级生产力法	释放氧气价值	市场价值法
	气候调节	植被、水面蒸腾或蒸发消耗能量	蒸散发模型	植被、水面调节温度价值	替代成本法（空调降温减湿成本）
文化服务产品	景观游憩	旅游总人次	统计调查法	景观游憩价值	市场价值法

类别	科目	实物量指标	实物量核算方法	价值量指标	价值量核算方法
物质供给产品	农业产品	农业产品产量	统计调查法	农业产品产值	市场价值法
	林业产品	林业产品产量	统计调查法	林业产品产值	市场价值法
	畜牧业产品	畜牧业产品产量	统计调查法	畜牧业产品产值	市场价值法
	渔业产品	渔业产品产量	统计调查法	渔业产品产值	市场价值法
	生态能源	水能、风能、光伏发电量	统计调查法	生态能源产值	市场价值法
调节服务产品	水源涵养	水源涵养量	水量平衡方程	水源涵养价值	影子工程法
	土壤保持	土壤保持量	修正水土流失方程	减少泥沙淤积与面源污染价值	替代成本法（清淤、环境工程降解成本）
	洪水调蓄	洪水调蓄量	水量平衡法；水库、湖泊调蓄模型	洪水调蓄价值	影子工程法
	空气净化	二氧化硫、氮氧化物、粉尘净化量	污染物净化模型	二氧化硫、氮氧化物、粉尘治理价值	替代成本法（污染物治理成本）
	水体净化	COD、总氮、总磷净化量	污染物净化模型	COD、总氮、总磷治理价值	替代成本法（污染物治理成本）
	固碳	二氧化碳固定量	固碳机理模型	固碳价值	市场价值法
	释氧	氧气释放量	净初级生产力法	释放氧气价值	市场价值法
	气候调节	植被、水面蒸腾或蒸发消耗能量	蒸散发模型	植被、水面调节温度价值	替代成本法（空调降温减湿成本）
文化服务产品	景观游憩	旅游总人次	统计调查法	景观游憩价值	市场价值法

生态系统类型	土地利用类型	实际地类
森林生态系统	林地	有林地
		竹林地
		乔木林地
		其他林地
园地生态系统	园地	果园
		茶园
		其他园地
农田生态系统	耕地	水田
		水浇地
		旱地
水域生态系统	水域	水库水面
		河流水面
		坑塘水面
城乡生态系统	硬化地表	建设用地
草地生态系统	草地	－
裸地生态系统	裸土地	－

Analysis of Value Accounting and Influencing Factors of Ecological Products in Typical Rare Earth Mineral Restoration Areas

典型稀土矿修复区生态产品价值核算与影响因素研究

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 34

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

一级指标	二级指标	“修复＋工业”片区		资源综合利用片区			生态复绿片区
一级指标	二级指标	2010	2016	2010	2016	2022	2016	2022
物质供给产品	直接利用物质产品	0.00	0.00	0.00	26.84	2.02×10²	0.00	0.21
物质供给产品	转化利用物质产品	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	2.33×10³	0.00	0.00
调节服务产品	水源涵养/(m³·a⁻¹)	4.91×10⁶	3.93×10⁶	2.24×10⁶	4.24×10⁶	1.67×10⁷	1.21×10⁶	2.12×10⁶
	土壤保持/(10⁴ t·a⁻¹)	63.99	70.01	24.26	38.64	1.62×10²	12.170	17.85
	洪水调蓄/(10⁴m³·a⁻¹)	7.31×10²	5.79×10²	4.03×10²	6.32×10²	1.970×10³	2.67×10²	3.62×10²
	水体净化/(t·a⁻¹)	5.58	5.56	1.70	1.71	5.19	0.18	0.32
	空气净化/(t·a⁻¹)	4.89	4.14	2.42	5.09	16.74	2.19	2.37
	固碳/(t·a⁻¹)	0.30	0.26	0.10	0.12	0.78	0.08	0.54
	释氧/(t·a⁻¹)	1.42	1.23	0.48	0.56	3.64	0.38	2.54
	气候调节/(10⁸kW·h·a⁻¹)	9.52×10³	8.58×10³	4.63×10³	6.61×10³	2.13×10³	2.37×10³	2.68×10³
	合计	1.08×10⁴	9.63×10³	5.28×10³	7.74×10³	2.76×10⁴	2.77×10³	3.28×10³
文化服务产品	景观游憩/（万人次）	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	4.15×10²	0.00	0.00
总计		1.08×10⁴	9.63×10³	5.28×10³	7.74×10³	2.80×10⁴	2.77×10³	3.28×10³

因子	VIF值	Pearson相关系数	因子	VIF值	Pearson相关系数
x₁	1.783	−0.147^**	x₆	3.017	0.194^**
x₂	1.127	0.157^**	x₇	4.400	−0.118^*
x₃	2.687	−0.171^**	x₈	2.158	0.234^**
x₄	1.314	−0.142^*	x₉	1.490	0.384^**
x₅	1.377	0.152^**	x₁₀	3.412	−0.119^*

[1]	Zhang Jinlan, Lin Zhuoling, Chen Kehai, Yu Huaiyi. Multi-Scale Analysis of the Controlling Factors on Rare Earth Element Contents in Typical High-Abundance Regions [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(8): 1310-1319.
[2]	LIN Yaoben, WANG Dong, WANG Xinliang. Spatial Differentiation of Paddy Soil Micro-ecological Environments and Their Influencing Factors in the Yellow River Irrigation District [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(5): 748-759.
[3]	ZHAO Shuang, NIE Qianyu, YUE Ang, WANG Dongchuan, SUN Xiaowei, ZHANG Haotian, LIU Haotian, YE Kai. Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Cultivated Land Fragmentation in Typical Agricultural Regions of Northern China under Topographic-Economic Synergy [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(4): 642-653.
[4]	MU Haofeng, SONG Zhelu, GAO Zhen, HOU Ying, CHEN Weiping. Temporal Dynamics and Influencing Factors of Urban PM_2.5 Pollution Risk Based on Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(2): 256-266.
[5]	SHI Hanzhi, CAO Yiran, LIU Fan, WU Zhichao, LI Furong, DENGTENG Haobo, XU Aiping, LI Dongqin, WEN Dian, WANG Xu. Study on the Regulation of Soil Lead Forms Transformation under the Combined Action of Straw and Bacteria [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(1): 155-166.
[6]	OUYANG Qunwen, GUO Xiaoping, HAO Jiahang, GUO Yu. Vegetation Succession Characteristics of Highway Slope Spraying in Beijing: A Perspective from the Soil Seed Bank [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(6): 941-949.
[7]	HAO Xiaoyan, DONG Chao, XUE Yang, HAN Liping. Symbiotic Effects and Influencing Factors of Energy Supply and Ecological Security in Energy Endowment Advantageous Areas [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(6): 974-985.
[8]	CHEN Jieru, YE Changsheng, WEI Wei, CAI Xin, WANG Lili. Analysis of “Production-Living-Ecological Space” Coupling Coordination and Influencing Factors in County Areas of Poyang Lake City Cluster [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(5): 807-818.
[9]	GUO Mingbin, GONG Jianzhou, WANG Lijuan, WANG Shikuan. Analysis of the Natural Dominant Factors Driving NO₂ Concentration Changes in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area from 2019 to 2023 [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(4): 534-547.
[10]	WANG Longfei, ZHANG Jiaojiao, WANG Ziyi, CHEN Yudong, LI Yi. Innovation and Practice of Biofilm-based Technology in the Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Systems [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(4): 653-664.
[11]	GUAN Jinshun, JIANG Xinyu, CHENG Jiong, CHEN Sanxiong, YU Shiqin. Study on the Enhancement of Carbon and Nitrogen Retention in Rare Earth Tailings Soil by Microalgae [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(12): 1890-1899.
[12]	WANG Chunmei, JIANG Bingqi, HU Jun, CHEN Daiwen, HUANG Lihua, CHENG Wanwan. Multi-scale Variations and Influencing Factors of Total Radioactivity in Atmospheric Environment Around Nuclear Power Plants [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(12): 1900-1908.
[13]	XIA Yining, LIU Peng’ao, HE Kerun, TIAN Chaohui, ZENG Liting, HOU Kelun. Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Scenario Simulations of Ecosystem Carbon Storage Based on Land Use Changes in the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan Metropolitan Area [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(11): 1661-1674.
[14]	XU Mingyu, YU Longsheng. Soil Improvement Effect of Agricultural and Forestry Waste Organic Materials on Ionic Rare Earth Mine Tailing [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(1): 126-134.
[15]	YE Junhong, LIU Zhenhuan, LIU Ziyu. Scenarios Simulation of Territorial Space Ecological Restoration Zoning in the Pearl River Delta Urban Agglomeration Area [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(1): 4-12.