Ecology and Environment ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 26-35.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2025.01.004
• Research Article [Ecology] • Previous Articles Next Articles
LU Dehao(), ZHENG Fenglin, GU Jiawei, SHUAI Xiaomai, YANG Jiaman, LI Cheng, CAI Mengzhen, CHEN Hongyue*(
)
Received:
2024-01-03
Online:
2025-01-18
Published:
2025-01-21
Contact:
CHEN Hongyue
卢德浩(), 郑峰霖, 古佳玮, 帅晓迈, 杨佳曼, 李程, 蔡梦真, 陈红跃*(
)
通讯作者:
陈红跃
作者简介:
卢德浩(1998年生),男,硕士,主要从事森林经营方向研究。E-mail: 875363261@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
LU Dehao, ZHENG Fenglin, GU Jiawei, SHUAI Xiaomai, YANG Jiaman, LI Cheng, CAI Mengzhen, CHEN Hongyue. Analysis and Evaluation of Litter and Soil Water Conservation Capacity of Different Stand Types[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2025, 34(1): 26-35.
卢德浩, 郑峰霖, 古佳玮, 帅晓迈, 杨佳曼, 李程, 蔡梦真, 陈红跃. 不同林分类型凋落物和土壤水源涵养能力分析与评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(1): 26-35.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2025.01.004
林分类型 | 海拔/m | 坡向 | 坡度/(°) | 林龄/a | 地貌 | 林分平均胸径/cm | 林分密度/(plant∙hm−2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
马尾松林 (MP) | 122.33±1.44 | 半阳坡 | 24.33±1.52 | 28 | 低山 | 22.23±0.62 | 891.67±44.62 |
加勒比松 (CP) | 194.33±1.66 | 半阳坡 | 25.00±0.47 | 31 | 低山 | 19.86±1.10 | 808.33±156.94 |
杉阔混交林 (MFB) | 110.00±2.36 | 半阳坡 | 25.00±1.25 | 26 | 低山 | 13.63±0.26 | 2016.67±186.46 |
杉木林 (CL) | 183.33±7.08 | 半阳坡 | 27.00±0.94 | 26 | 低山 | 17.31±0.35 | 1208.33±100.23 |
Table 1 General situation of sample site
林分类型 | 海拔/m | 坡向 | 坡度/(°) | 林龄/a | 地貌 | 林分平均胸径/cm | 林分密度/(plant∙hm−2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
马尾松林 (MP) | 122.33±1.44 | 半阳坡 | 24.33±1.52 | 28 | 低山 | 22.23±0.62 | 891.67±44.62 |
加勒比松 (CP) | 194.33±1.66 | 半阳坡 | 25.00±0.47 | 31 | 低山 | 19.86±1.10 | 808.33±156.94 |
杉阔混交林 (MFB) | 110.00±2.36 | 半阳坡 | 25.00±1.25 | 26 | 低山 | 13.63±0.26 | 2016.67±186.46 |
杉木林 (CL) | 183.33±7.08 | 半阳坡 | 27.00±0.94 | 26 | 低山 | 17.31±0.35 | 1208.33±100.23 |
林分类型 | 厚度/cm | w(OM)/(g∙kg−2) | 现存量/(t∙hm−2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
未分解层 | 半分解层 | 未分解层 | 半分解层 | 未分解层 | 半分解层 | |||
MP | 2.58±0.33b | 2.96±0.31a | 519.47±2.34a | 492.96±0.31a | 2.11±0.01b | 2.31±0.11b | ||
CP | 2.85±0.21ab | 3.34±0.34a | 493.81±4.25a | 472.89±1.02ab | 2.47±0.48ab | 2.79±0.32ab | ||
MFB | 3.36±0.48a | 3.11±0.51a | 417.94±18.62b | 424.70±21.91ab | 3.23±0.11a | 3.49±0.15a | ||
CL | 3.12±0.16ab | 3.35±0.42a | 435.17±8.13ab | 388.28±40.71b | 3.00±0.12ab | 3.06±0.24ab |
Table 2 Litter properties of different stand types
林分类型 | 厚度/cm | w(OM)/(g∙kg−2) | 现存量/(t∙hm−2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
未分解层 | 半分解层 | 未分解层 | 半分解层 | 未分解层 | 半分解层 | |||
MP | 2.58±0.33b | 2.96±0.31a | 519.47±2.34a | 492.96±0.31a | 2.11±0.01b | 2.31±0.11b | ||
CP | 2.85±0.21ab | 3.34±0.34a | 493.81±4.25a | 472.89±1.02ab | 2.47±0.48ab | 2.79±0.32ab | ||
MFB | 3.36±0.48a | 3.11±0.51a | 417.94±18.62b | 424.70±21.91ab | 3.23±0.11a | 3.49±0.15a | ||
CL | 3.12±0.16ab | 3.35±0.42a | 435.17±8.13ab | 388.28±40.71b | 3.00±0.12ab | 3.06±0.24ab |
林分 类型 | 未分解层 | 半分解层 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
拟合方程 | r2 | 拟合方程 | r2 | ||
MP | Q=3.7010lnt+45.2950 | 0.9450 | Q=3.5280lnt+46.7775 | 0.9402 | |
CP | Q=3.0130lnt+45.1698 | 0.9643 | Q=2.7836lnt+47.2893 | 0.9890 | |
MFB | Q=3.4851lnt+52.2210 | 0.9720 | Q=3.5372lnt+50.3278 | 0.9720 | |
CLH | Q=3.0885lnt+50.1500 | 0.9531 | Q=2.8097lnt+51.9631 | 0.9396 |
Table 3 Fitting equations of water retention and soaking time of litter in different decomposition states
林分 类型 | 未分解层 | 半分解层 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
拟合方程 | r2 | 拟合方程 | r2 | ||
MP | Q=3.7010lnt+45.2950 | 0.9450 | Q=3.5280lnt+46.7775 | 0.9402 | |
CP | Q=3.0130lnt+45.1698 | 0.9643 | Q=2.7836lnt+47.2893 | 0.9890 | |
MFB | Q=3.4851lnt+52.2210 | 0.9720 | Q=3.5372lnt+50.3278 | 0.9720 | |
CLH | Q=3.0885lnt+50.1500 | 0.9531 | Q=2.8097lnt+51.9631 | 0.9396 |
林分类型 | 土层/cm | 容重/(g∙cm−3) | 非毛管孔隙度/% | 毛管孔隙度/% | 总孔隙度/% | w(OM)/(g∙kg−1) | pH | w(TN)/(g∙kg−1) | w(TP)/(g∙kg−1) | w(TK)/(g∙kg−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MP | 0−20 | 1.32±0.03a | 4.86±0.13b | 40.02±1.27b | 44.88±1.37a | 21.27±1.41b | 4.01±0.04b | 0.79±0.05b | 0.22±0.01b | 16.81±2.36b |
20−40 | 1.34±0.01a | 4.83±0.09a | 40.48±0.79b | 45.31±0.77a | 16.50±1.29ab | 4.04±0.05b | 0.62±0.03ab | 0.20±0.01b | 15.91±2.30b | |
40−60 | 1.39±0.01ab | 5.07±0.18b | 40.62±1.15ab | 45.69±0.98b | 13.13±1.13b | 4.11±0.04b | 0.55±0.05ab | 0.21±0.01b | 17.51±2.47b | |
均值 | 1.36±0.02a | 4.92±0.13b | 40.37±1.07b | 45.29±1.04b | 16.96±1.02b | 4.06±0.04b | 0.65±0.03b | 0.21±0.01b | 16.74±2.37b | |
CP | 0−20 | 1.14±0.07b | 5.58±0.16a | 48.63±1.32a | 54.21±1.27a | 37.90±0.86a | 3.96±0.04b | 1.27±0.05a | 0.18±0.01b | 6.23±0.29c |
20−40 | 1.19±0.06b | 5.54±0.15a | 47.95±1.02a | 53.49±0.87a | 25.48±1.55a | 3.92±0.04b | 0.90±0.07a | 0.18±0.01b | 7.49±0.81c | |
40−60 | 1.25±0.01b | 6.23±0.20a | 48.19±0.50a | 54.42±0.60a | 20.35±1.63a | 4.04±0.03b | 0.75±0.06a | 0.19±0.02b | 8.05±0.78c | |
均值 | 1.19±0.05b | 5.78±0.17a | 48.26±0.95a | 54.04±0.91a | 27.91±1.16a | 3.97±0.03b | 0.97±0.04a | 0.18±0.01b | 7.26±0.61c | |
MFB | 0−20 | 1.22±0.06ab | 5.62±0.05a | 42.47±0.37b | 48.09±0.39a | 17.29±0.60bc | 4.43±0.04a | 0.72±0.04b | 0.78±0.24a | 34.41±5.62a |
20−40 | 1.25±0.05ab | 5.53±0.34a | 42.29±0.43b | 47.82±0.76a | 12.95±0.85b | 4.50±0.11a | 0.58±0.02ab | 0.81±0.25a | 33.44±5.04a | |
40−60 | 1.31±0.01ab | 5.98±0.33ab | 40.93±0.32b | 46.91±0.64b | 12.03±0.80b | 4.46±0.09a | 0.55±0.02ab | 0.90±0.22a | 33.12±2.80a | |
均值 | 1.26±0.04ab | 5.71±0.24a | 41.90±0.37b | 47.61±0.60b | 14.09±0.69bc | 4.47±0.07a | 0.62±0.02b | 0.83±0.24a | 33.65±4.37a | |
CL | 0−20 | 1.34±0.09a | 5.28±0.18ab | 39.24±0.63b | 44.51±0.61a | 12.89±2.08c | 4.26±0.04ab | 0.54±0.04b | 0.25±0.01b | 32.61±2.29a |
20−40 | 1.43±0.04a | 5.19±0.19a | 40.25±0.97b | 45.45±0.79a | 10.93±2.46b | 4.26±0.08ab | 0.46±0.05b | 0.24±0.01b | 31.75±0.99a | |
40−60 | 1.45±0.02a | 5.46±0.16ab | 40.11±0.68ab | 45.57±0.53b | 8.69±0.76c | 4.28±0.05ab | 0.43±0.01b | 0.24±0.01b | 32.73±2.23a | |
均值 | 1.41±0.05a | 5.31±0.18ab | 39.87±0.76b | 45.18±0.64b | 10.84±1.76c | 4.26±0.05ab | 0.48±0.03b | 0.24±0.01b | 32.36±1.81a |
Table 4 Soil physicochemical properties of different stand types
林分类型 | 土层/cm | 容重/(g∙cm−3) | 非毛管孔隙度/% | 毛管孔隙度/% | 总孔隙度/% | w(OM)/(g∙kg−1) | pH | w(TN)/(g∙kg−1) | w(TP)/(g∙kg−1) | w(TK)/(g∙kg−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MP | 0−20 | 1.32±0.03a | 4.86±0.13b | 40.02±1.27b | 44.88±1.37a | 21.27±1.41b | 4.01±0.04b | 0.79±0.05b | 0.22±0.01b | 16.81±2.36b |
20−40 | 1.34±0.01a | 4.83±0.09a | 40.48±0.79b | 45.31±0.77a | 16.50±1.29ab | 4.04±0.05b | 0.62±0.03ab | 0.20±0.01b | 15.91±2.30b | |
40−60 | 1.39±0.01ab | 5.07±0.18b | 40.62±1.15ab | 45.69±0.98b | 13.13±1.13b | 4.11±0.04b | 0.55±0.05ab | 0.21±0.01b | 17.51±2.47b | |
均值 | 1.36±0.02a | 4.92±0.13b | 40.37±1.07b | 45.29±1.04b | 16.96±1.02b | 4.06±0.04b | 0.65±0.03b | 0.21±0.01b | 16.74±2.37b | |
CP | 0−20 | 1.14±0.07b | 5.58±0.16a | 48.63±1.32a | 54.21±1.27a | 37.90±0.86a | 3.96±0.04b | 1.27±0.05a | 0.18±0.01b | 6.23±0.29c |
20−40 | 1.19±0.06b | 5.54±0.15a | 47.95±1.02a | 53.49±0.87a | 25.48±1.55a | 3.92±0.04b | 0.90±0.07a | 0.18±0.01b | 7.49±0.81c | |
40−60 | 1.25±0.01b | 6.23±0.20a | 48.19±0.50a | 54.42±0.60a | 20.35±1.63a | 4.04±0.03b | 0.75±0.06a | 0.19±0.02b | 8.05±0.78c | |
均值 | 1.19±0.05b | 5.78±0.17a | 48.26±0.95a | 54.04±0.91a | 27.91±1.16a | 3.97±0.03b | 0.97±0.04a | 0.18±0.01b | 7.26±0.61c | |
MFB | 0−20 | 1.22±0.06ab | 5.62±0.05a | 42.47±0.37b | 48.09±0.39a | 17.29±0.60bc | 4.43±0.04a | 0.72±0.04b | 0.78±0.24a | 34.41±5.62a |
20−40 | 1.25±0.05ab | 5.53±0.34a | 42.29±0.43b | 47.82±0.76a | 12.95±0.85b | 4.50±0.11a | 0.58±0.02ab | 0.81±0.25a | 33.44±5.04a | |
40−60 | 1.31±0.01ab | 5.98±0.33ab | 40.93±0.32b | 46.91±0.64b | 12.03±0.80b | 4.46±0.09a | 0.55±0.02ab | 0.90±0.22a | 33.12±2.80a | |
均值 | 1.26±0.04ab | 5.71±0.24a | 41.90±0.37b | 47.61±0.60b | 14.09±0.69bc | 4.47±0.07a | 0.62±0.02b | 0.83±0.24a | 33.65±4.37a | |
CL | 0−20 | 1.34±0.09a | 5.28±0.18ab | 39.24±0.63b | 44.51±0.61a | 12.89±2.08c | 4.26±0.04ab | 0.54±0.04b | 0.25±0.01b | 32.61±2.29a |
20−40 | 1.43±0.04a | 5.19±0.19a | 40.25±0.97b | 45.45±0.79a | 10.93±2.46b | 4.26±0.08ab | 0.46±0.05b | 0.24±0.01b | 31.75±0.99a | |
40−60 | 1.45±0.02a | 5.46±0.16ab | 40.11±0.68ab | 45.57±0.53b | 8.69±0.76c | 4.28±0.05ab | 0.43±0.01b | 0.24±0.01b | 32.73±2.23a | |
均值 | 1.41±0.05a | 5.31±0.18ab | 39.87±0.76b | 45.18±0.64b | 10.84±1.76c | 4.26±0.05ab | 0.48±0.03b | 0.24±0.01b | 32.36±1.81a |
林分 类型 | 土层/ cm | 饱和持水量/ (t∙hm−2) | 毛管持水量/ (t∙hm−2) | 非毛管持水量/ (t∙hm−2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
MP | 0−20 | 663.59±20.76b | 591.71±19.76b | 71.88±1.22b |
2−40 | 656.46±11.69b | 586.52±12.03b | 69.95±1.23b | |
40−60 | 681.36±10.76b | 605.47±13.88b | 75.89±3.19b | |
均值 | 667.14±14.40b | 594.57±15.22b | 72.57±1.88b | |
CP | 0−20 | 928.38±16.67a | 832.82±16.34a | 95.56±3.75a |
20−40 | 879.56±30.75a | 788.4±28.09a | 91.17±4.88a | |
40−60 | 930.17±48.32a | 823.31±39.77a | 106.86±8.58a | |
均值 | 912.70±31.91a | 814.84±28.07a | 97.86±5.74a | |
MFB | 0−20 | 665.36±23.48b | 584.08±20.3b | 81.27±3.27ab |
20−40 | 642.18±22.73b | 564.70±17.82b | 77.47±5.47ab | |
40−60 | 656.37±22.16b | 568.85±18.11b | 87.52±5.21ab | |
均值 | 654.64±22.79b | 572.54±18.74b | 82.09±4.65ab | |
CL | 0−20 | 630.80±23.12b | 556.32±23.00b | 74.48±0.92ab |
20−40 | 642.35±31.81b | 569.41±29.69b | 72.94±4.08ab | |
40−60 | 658.40±31.57b | 580.06±30.81b | 78.34±1.10b | |
均值 | 643.85±28.83b | 568.60±27.83b | 75.25±2.05b |
Table 5 Soil water holding capacity of different stand types
林分 类型 | 土层/ cm | 饱和持水量/ (t∙hm−2) | 毛管持水量/ (t∙hm−2) | 非毛管持水量/ (t∙hm−2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
MP | 0−20 | 663.59±20.76b | 591.71±19.76b | 71.88±1.22b |
2−40 | 656.46±11.69b | 586.52±12.03b | 69.95±1.23b | |
40−60 | 681.36±10.76b | 605.47±13.88b | 75.89±3.19b | |
均值 | 667.14±14.40b | 594.57±15.22b | 72.57±1.88b | |
CP | 0−20 | 928.38±16.67a | 832.82±16.34a | 95.56±3.75a |
20−40 | 879.56±30.75a | 788.4±28.09a | 91.17±4.88a | |
40−60 | 930.17±48.32a | 823.31±39.77a | 106.86±8.58a | |
均值 | 912.70±31.91a | 814.84±28.07a | 97.86±5.74a | |
MFB | 0−20 | 665.36±23.48b | 584.08±20.3b | 81.27±3.27ab |
20−40 | 642.18±22.73b | 564.70±17.82b | 77.47±5.47ab | |
40−60 | 656.37±22.16b | 568.85±18.11b | 87.52±5.21ab | |
均值 | 654.64±22.79b | 572.54±18.74b | 82.09±4.65ab | |
CL | 0−20 | 630.80±23.12b | 556.32±23.00b | 74.48±0.92ab |
20−40 | 642.35±31.81b | 569.41±29.69b | 72.94±4.08ab | |
40−60 | 658.40±31.57b | 580.06±30.81b | 78.34±1.10b | |
均值 | 643.85±28.83b | 568.60±27.83b | 75.25±2.05b |
指标 | SW | SC | SNC | BD | STP | SCP | SNP | SOC | pH | STN | STP | STK |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SW1) | 1*** | |||||||||||
SC2) | 0.986*** | 1*** | ||||||||||
SNC3) | 0.657*13) | 0.601* | 1*** | |||||||||
BD4) | −0.935***15) | −0.939*** | −0.666* | 1*** | ||||||||
STP5) | 0.846*** | 0.839*** | 0.510 | −0.676* | 1*** | |||||||
SCP6) | 0.888*** | 0.881*** | 0.510 | −0.736**14) | 0.986*** | 1*** | ||||||
SNP7) | 0.329 | 0.266 | 0.846*** | −0.242 | 0.427 | 0.357 | 1*** | |||||
SOC8) | 0.622* | 0.650* | 0.406 | −0.648* | 0.476 | 0.545 | 0.133 | 1*** | ||||
pH9) | −0.455 | −0.469 | −0.224 | 0.483 | −0.357 | −0.427 | 0.021 | −0.776** | 1*** | |||
TN10) | 0.587* | 0.629* | 0.490 | −0.701* | 0.399 | 0.469 | 0.182 | 0.951*** | −0.685* | 1*** | ||
TP11) | −0.545 | −0.545 | −0.231 | 0.634* | −0.301 | −0.385 | 0.126 | −0.713** | 0.874*** | −0.664* | 1*** | |
TK12) | −0.573 | −0.580* | −0.252 | 0.599* | −0.441 | −0.497 | 0.014 | −0.874*** | 0.902*** | −0.783** | 0.916*** | 1*** |
Table 6 Correlation analysis between soil properties and water holding capacity
指标 | SW | SC | SNC | BD | STP | SCP | SNP | SOC | pH | STN | STP | STK |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SW1) | 1*** | |||||||||||
SC2) | 0.986*** | 1*** | ||||||||||
SNC3) | 0.657*13) | 0.601* | 1*** | |||||||||
BD4) | −0.935***15) | −0.939*** | −0.666* | 1*** | ||||||||
STP5) | 0.846*** | 0.839*** | 0.510 | −0.676* | 1*** | |||||||
SCP6) | 0.888*** | 0.881*** | 0.510 | −0.736**14) | 0.986*** | 1*** | ||||||
SNP7) | 0.329 | 0.266 | 0.846*** | −0.242 | 0.427 | 0.357 | 1*** | |||||
SOC8) | 0.622* | 0.650* | 0.406 | −0.648* | 0.476 | 0.545 | 0.133 | 1*** | ||||
pH9) | −0.455 | −0.469 | −0.224 | 0.483 | −0.357 | −0.427 | 0.021 | −0.776** | 1*** | |||
TN10) | 0.587* | 0.629* | 0.490 | −0.701* | 0.399 | 0.469 | 0.182 | 0.951*** | −0.685* | 1*** | ||
TP11) | −0.545 | −0.545 | −0.231 | 0.634* | −0.301 | −0.385 | 0.126 | −0.713** | 0.874*** | −0.664* | 1*** | |
TK12) | −0.573 | −0.580* | −0.252 | 0.599* | −0.441 | −0.497 | 0.014 | −0.874*** | 0.902*** | −0.783** | 0.916*** | 1*** |
林分类型 | 凋落物现存量 | 凋落物最大持水量 | 凋落物有效拦蓄量 | 土壤饱和持水量 | 土壤毛管持水量 | 土壤非毛管持水量 | 综合评价 | 综合排序 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MP | 0.39 | 0.14 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 1.70 | 4 |
CP | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.45 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 1.19 | 2 |
MFB | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 1.03 | 1 |
CL | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 1.41 | 3 |
Table 7 Comprehensive evaluation of water conservation capacity of litter and soil of different stand types
林分类型 | 凋落物现存量 | 凋落物最大持水量 | 凋落物有效拦蓄量 | 土壤饱和持水量 | 土壤毛管持水量 | 土壤非毛管持水量 | 综合评价 | 综合排序 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MP | 0.39 | 0.14 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 1.70 | 4 |
CP | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.45 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 1.19 | 2 |
MFB | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 1.03 | 1 |
CL | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 1.41 | 3 |
[1] | EDWARDS D P, TOBIAS J A, SHE D, et al., 2014. Maintaining ecosystem function and services in logged tropical forests[J]. Trends in Ecology &. Evolution, 29(9):511-520. |
[2] | GERRITS M, SAVENIJE H, HOFFMANN L, et al., 2007. New technique to measure forest floor interception-an application in a beech forest in Luxembourg[J]. Hydrology and Earth Systems Sciences, 11(74):695-701. |
[3] | GU Z J, WU X X, ZHOU F, et al., 2013. Estimating the effect of Pinus massoniana Lamb plots on soil and water conservation during rainfall events using vegetation fractional coverage[J]. Catena, 109:225-233. |
[4] | HORODECKI P, NOWINSKI M, JAGODZINSKI A, 2018. Advantages of mixed tree stands in restoration of upper soil layers on postmining sites: A five-year leaf litter decomposition experiment[J]. Land Degradation and Development, 30(1):3-13. |
[5] | LUO X, ZHANG Y C, 2015. Interdecadal change in the seasonality of rainfall variation in South China[J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 119(1-2):1-11. |
[6] | WANG B R, ZHAO X D, LIU Y, et al., 2019. Using soil aggregate stability and erodibility to evaluate the sustainability of large-scale afforestation of Robinia pseudoacacia and Caragana korshinskii in the Loess Plateau[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 450:117491. |
[7] | XIE J S, GUO J F, YANG Z J, et al., 2013. Rapid accumulation of carbon on severely eroded red soils through afforestation in subtropical China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 300:53-59. |
[8] | ZHU G Y, SHANGGUAN Z P, DENG L, 2017. Soil aggregate stability and aggregate-associated carbon and nitrogen in natural restoration grassland and Chinese red pine plantation on the Loess Plateau[J]. Catena, 149(Part 1):253-260. |
[9] | ZHU X, LIU W J, CHEN H, et al., 2019. Effects of forest transition on litterfall, standing litter and related nutrient returns: implications for forest management in tropical China[J]. Geoderma, 333:123-134. |
[10] | 白云星, 周运超, 张薰元, 等, 2021. 马尾松针阔混交人工林凋落物和土壤水源涵养能力[J]. 林业科学, 57(11):24-36. |
BAI Y X, ZHOU Y C, ZHANG X Y, et al., 2021. Water conservation capacity of litter and soil in mixed plantation of Pinus massoniana and broadleaved trees[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 57(11):24-36. | |
[11] | 鲍士旦, 2000. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社. |
BAO S D, 2000. Agrochemical analysis of soils[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press. | |
[12] | 曹智, 文仕知, 何功秀, 等, 2024. 南方红壤丘陵区水土保持林对枯落物和土壤养分的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 39(1):154-161. |
CAO Z, WEN S Z, HE G X, et al., 2024. Effects of soil and water conservation forest on litter and soil nutrients in red hilly region of Southern China[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 39(1):154-161. | |
[13] | 陈晶亮, 杨慧, 刘超, 等, 2023. 宁夏罗山自然保护区3种典型林分凋落物和土壤层水源涵养能力综合评估[J]. 生态学报, 43(19):7987-7997. |
CHEN J L, YANG H, LIU C, et al., 2023. Comprehensive evaluation of the water conservation capacity of litter and soil layers in three typical forest types in the Luoshan Nature Reserve, Ningxia[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(19):7987-7997. | |
[14] | 何圣嘉, 谢锦升, 杨智杰, 等, 2011. 南方红壤丘陵区马尾松林下水土流失现状、成因及防治[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 9(6):65-70. |
HE S J, XIE J S, YANG Z J, et al., 2011. Status, causes and prevention of soil and water loss in Pinus massoniana woodland in hilly red soil region of southern China. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 9(6):65-70. | |
[15] | 李阳, 万福绪, 2019. 黄浦江中游5种典型林分枯落物和土壤水源涵养能力研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 33(2):264-271. |
LI Y, WAN F X, 2019. Water conservation capacities of litters and soils in five typical stands in the middle reaches of Huangpu River[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 33(2):264-271. | |
[16] | 林立文, 邓羽松, 李佩琦, 等, 2020. 桂北地区不同密度杉木林枯落物与土壤水文效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 34(5):200-207, 215. |
LIN L W, DENG Y S, LI P Q, et al., 2020. Study on the effects of litter and soil hydrology of different density Cunninghamia lanceolata forests in Northern Guangxi[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 34(5):200-207, 215. | |
[17] |
马佳明, 赵鹏, 刘雪莹, 等, 2021. 崇陵流域不同林分类型枯落物水文效应研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 30(4):691-699.
DOI |
MA J M, ZHAO P, LIU X Y, et al., 2021. Research on the hydrological effects of litters of different forest types in Chongling Watershed[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 30(4):691-699. | |
[18] | 聂泽旭, 齐实, 马曦瑶, 等, 2020. 华蓥市山区典型林分水源涵养功能评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 34(2):276-282. |
NIE Z X, QI S, MA X Y, et al., 2020. Evaluation of water conservation function of typical stands in mountainous areas of Huaying City[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 34(2):276-282. | |
[19] | 潘春翔, 李裕元, 彭亿, 等, 2012. 湖南乌云界自然保护区典型生态系统的土壤持水性能[J]. 生态学报, 32(2):538-547. |
PAN C X, LI Y Y, PENG Y, et al., 2012. Soil water holding capacity under four typical ecosystems in Wuyunjie Nature Reserve of Hunan Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(2):538-547. | |
[20] | 蒲嘉霖, 刘亮, 2019. 亚热带森林凋落物分解特征及水文效应[J]. 水土保持研究, 26(6):165-170. |
PAN J L, LIU L, 2019. Hydrology functions and decomposition characteristics of litter in subtropical forest[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 26(6):165-170. | |
[21] | 申卫军, 彭少麟, 周国逸, 等, 2001. 马占相思 (Acacia mangium) 与湿地松 (Pinus elliotii) 人工林枯落物层的水文生态功能[J]. 生态学报, 21(5):846-850. |
SHEN W J, PENG S L, ZHOU G Y, et al., 2001. Ecohydrological functions of litter in man-made Acacia mangium and Pinus elliotii plantations[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 21(5):846-850. | |
[22] | 孙欧文, 蔡建国, 吴家森, 等, 2019. 浙江省典型森林类型枯落物及林下土壤水文特性[J]. 水土保持研究, 26(1):118-123. |
SUN O W, CAI J G, WU J S, et al., 2019. Hydrological characteristics of litter and forest soil of typical forest types in Zhejiang Province[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 26(1):118-123. | |
[23] | 王飞, 白青蒙, 曹秀文, 等, 2023. 甘南白龙江3种次生林叶片-凋落物-土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 43(12):116-125. |
WANG F, BAI Q M, CAO X W, et al., 2023. Ecological stoichiometry of leaf-litter-soil continuum of three secondary forests in Bailongjiang, southern Gansu province[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 43(12):116-125. | |
[24] | 王棣, 吕皎, 2001. 油松混交林的水土保持及水源涵养功能研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 15(4):44-46. |
WANG D, LÜ J, 2001. Function of water and soil conservation of mixed forest of Pinus tabulaef ormis[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 15(4):44-46. | |
[25] | 王利, 于立忠, 张金鑫, 等, 2015. 浑河上游水源地不同林型水源涵养功能分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 29(3):249-255. |
WANG L, YU L Z, ZHANG J X, et al., 2015. Analysis of water conservation functions of different forest types in the upper reaches of Hunhe River[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 29(3):249-255. | |
[26] | 韦宇静, 梁士楚, 黄雅丽, 等, 2014. 巨尾桉与几种阔叶树和针叶树碳储量的比较研究[J]. 广西科学院学报, 30(4):229-232. |
WEI Y J, LIANG S C, HUANG Y L, et al., 2014. Comparative study on the carbon storage between Eucalyptus grandis×E. urophylla and some conifer and broad-leaved tree species[J]. Journal of Guangxi Academy of Sciences, 30(4):229-232. | |
[27] | 魏宏征, 肖战峰, 何小军, 等, 2020. 甘肃子午岭林区不同林分水源涵养能力研究[J]. 林业资源管理 (4):87-94. |
WEI H Z, XIAO Z F, HE X J, et al., 2020. A study on the conservation capacity of different forest water sources in Ziwu Mountain of Gansu Province[J]. Forest Resources Management (4):87-94. | |
[28] | 伍倩, 闫文德, 梁小翠, 等, 2015. 亚热带4种典型人工林凋落物持水特性[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 35(12):76-81, 94. |
WU Q, YAN W D, LIANG X C, et al., 2015. Water holding characteristics of litters in 4 plantations in subtropical zone[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 35(12):76-81, 94. | |
[29] | 颜耀, 张辉, 黄智军, 等, 2020. 补植阔叶树种对红壤侵蚀区马尾松林水源涵养功能的影响[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 49(1):67-73. |
YAN Y, ZHANG H, HUANG Z J, et al., 2020. Effects of replanting broad-leaved tree species on water conservation of Pinus massoniana plantation in red soil eroded region[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 49(1):67-73. | |
[30] | 杨静, 张耀艺, 谭思懿, 等, 2020. 亚热带不同树种土壤水源涵养功能[J]. 生态学报, 40(13):4594-4604. |
YANG J, ZHANG Y Y, TAN S Y, et al., 2020. Soil water conservation functions of different plantations in subtropical forest[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(13):4594-4604. | |
[31] | 赵敏, 戴全厚, 严友进, 等, 2024. 喀斯特山地典型植被类型凋落物和土壤水文效应[J]. 水土保持研究, 31(1):241-249. |
ZHAO M, DAI Q H, YAN Y J, et al., 2024. Litter and soil hydrological effects of typical vegetation types in Karst Mountains[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 31(1):241-249. | |
[32] | 张万儒, 杨光滢, 屠星南, 2000. 森林土壤分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国标准出版社. |
ZHANG W R, YANG G Y, TU X N, et al., 2000. Forest Soil Analysis Methods[M]. Beijing: Standards Press of China. | |
[33] | 张益, 林毅雁, 张杰铭, 等, 2023. 北京山区典型植被枯落物和土壤层水文功能[J]. 水土保持研究, 30(4):160-168. |
ZHANG Y, LIN Y Y, ZHANG J M, et al., 2023. Hydrological function of litter and soil layer of typical vegetation in Beijing mountainous area[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 30(4):160-168. | |
[34] | 赵芸, 赵文涛, 杨宁, 等, 2022. 青岛市主要树种含碳量及森林生态系统碳储量变化分析[J]. 林业科技, 47(3):54-57. |
ZHAO Y, ZHAO W T, YANG N, et al., 2022. Change analysis of carbon content of main tree species and carbon storage of forest ecosystem in Qingdao[J]. Forestry Science & Technology, 47(3):54-57. | |
[35] | 朱少木, 2012. 杉木深山含笑混交林分生物量结构研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 18(13):121-123. |
ZHU S M, 2012. Study on biomass structure of mixed forest of Chinese fir in deep mountain[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 18(13):121-123. |
[1] | XU Mingyu, YU Longsheng. Soil Improvement Effect of Agricultural and Forestry Waste Organic Materials on Ionic Rare Earth Mine Tailing [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2025, 34(1): 126-134. |
[2] | HUANG Lianxi, WANG Zehuang, TIAN Lihua, ZHAO Jingpeng, CHEN Weisheng, LIN Qimei, HUANG Qing, WEI Lan. Characteristics and Differences of Soil Mineral Nutrients in Jiangmen City, Guangdong Province [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2025, 34(1): 46-55. |
[3] | HOU Jinlong, MA Zhiqiang, YANG Cheng, GE Shuangshuang, HE Di, DONG Fan. Analysis of Spatio-temporal Variation of Vegetation Carbon Sources and Sinks in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region and Influencing Factors [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(9): 1329-1338. |
[4] | LI Jianfu, HUANG Zhilin, HE Chengzhong, JIANG Xin, SONG Lin, LIU Jiaxin, CHEN Liding. Spatial Distribution and Key Factors Affecting Soil Organic Carbon Within the Karst Fault Basin in Eastern Yunnan, China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(9): 1339-1352. |
[5] | LI Yanlin, CHEN Yangyang, YANG Shuangrong, LIU Jumei. Study on the Effects of Organic Acids in Plant Root Exudates on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Mineralization [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(9): 1362-1371. |
[6] | SHI Hanzhi, XIONG Zhenqian, CAO Yiran, WU Zhichao, WEN Dian, LI Furong, LI Dongqin, WANG Xu. Effect of Straw Returning to Field on Organic Carbon Fixation in Red Soil and Black Soil [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(9): 1372-1383. |
[7] | ZHU Leyang, ZHANG Xizhe, TAO Jiang, WANG Xiu, HAN Yanying, YE Yanhui. The Effect of Nitrogen Addition on Soil Respiration in the Abies Georgei var. Smithii Forest of Sygera Mountains [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(9): 1384-1396. |
[8] | ZHU Ling, WEI Tianxing, YU Huan, WANG Xian, FAN Dehui, ZHAO Yuqi. Allelopathic Potential of Robinia pseudoacacia Root System and Rhizosphere Soil on 7 Species of Arbor, Shrub, and Grass Plants [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(9): 1406-1415. |
[9] | WU Dongyang, WU Jiahuan, LI Weizhi, HUANG Zhijie, YANG Chunya, CHEN Huojun. Effects of Vermicompost and Pig manure Combined with Chemical Fertilizers on Soil Quality, Growth and Quality of Peppers [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(9): 1416-1425. |
[10] | CONG Xin, ZHANG Huaidi, ZHANG Rong, ZHAO Cen, CHEN Kun, LIU Hanbing. Pollution Characteristics and Risk Analysis of Heavy Metal in Farmland Soils of China in Recent 10 Years Based on Meta Analysis [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(9): 1451-1459. |
[11] | LIU Dongyi, QU Yonghua, FENG Yaowei, QU Ran. Research on Chromium Ion Content Inversion of GF-5 Satellite Images Based on Grid Search Optimization CatBoost Model [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(9): 1460-1470. |
[12] | PANG Bo, HAI Xiang, ZHANG Haifang, ZHANG Yanjun, WANG Hui, LIU Hongmei, YANG Dianlin. Effects of Spread of Veratrum nigrum on Vegetation Characteristics and Soil Physicochemical Properties in Mountain Meadow Steppe [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(8): 1174-1181. |
[13] | WANG Wenjing, ZHAI Shuijing, WANG Sai. Distribution Characteristics of Silicon and Its Influencing Factors in the Wetland Soils along the Minjiang River Downstream [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(8): 1182-1191. |
[14] | FAN Beibie, DING Shuai, ZHANG Tiantian, ZHANG Shuai, WEI Lulu, CHEN Qing. Simulation Study on Phosphorus Loss Risk with Periodic Flooding-Drying and Straw Incorporation in a Dolomite-Amended Brown Soil [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(8): 1203-1213. |
[15] | ZHANG Jinglei, WANG Guoliang, WU Bo, JIA Chunlin, ZHANG Jinhong, ZHOU Yuan, MA Bing. The Effects of Alfalfa-Triticale Rotation on Soil Bacterial and Fungal Community Diversity and Co-occurrence Network in Coastal Saline-Alkaline Soil [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(7): 1048-1062. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn