The Influencing Factors and Spatial Pattern Evolution of the Potential for Green Agricultural Development in Guangdong Province

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2024.10.012

Ecology and Environment ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 1600-1611.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2024.10.012

• Research Article [Environmental Science] • Previous Articles Next Articles

The Influencing Factors and Spatial Pattern Evolution of the Potential for Green Agricultural Development in Guangdong Province

HU Yunfei¹(), TAO Liang²^,^*(), LUO Yiwen¹

1. Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangzhou 510640, P. R. China
2. National-Regional Joint Engineering Research Center for Soil Pollution Control and Remediation in South China/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Integrated Agro-environmental Pollution Control and Management/Institute of Eco-environmental and Soil Sciences, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, P. R. China.

Received:2024-07-12 Online:2024-10-18 Published:2024-11-15
Contact: TAO Liang

广东省农业绿色发展潜力影响因素及空间格局演变

胡韵菲¹(), 陶亮²^,^*(), 罗旖文¹

1.广东省农业科学院农业经济与信息研究所/农业农村部华南都市农业重点实验室，广东广州 510640
2.广东省科学院生态环境与土壤研究所/华南土壤污染控制与修复国家地方联合工程研究中心/广东省农业环境综合治理重点实验室，广东广州 510650

通讯作者: 陶亮
作者简介:胡韵菲（1990年生），女，助理研究员，博士，研究方向为农业区域发展。E-mail: huyunfei2015@qq.com
基金资助:
广东省基础与应用基础研究基金自然科学基金面上项目(2023A1515011018);广东省科技计划项目(2023B1212060044);广东省农业农村厅2024年省级乡村振兴战略专项“耕地种植用途管控全域试点、动态监测与管理体系构建”

Abstract

Abstract:

Facing the opportunity for Guangdong to support a new round of high-quality development with new quality productive forces and to find a feasible implementation path for improving the level of agricultural green development with new quality productive forces in the next stage, the Delphi method was used to evaluate the agricultural production level, resource and environmental protection degree, and agricultural green development potential in Guangdong Province over the past 30 years (1990-2020). An explanatory model for agricultural green development potential was established and its spatiotemporal evolution pattern was explored. The results indicated that between 1990 and 2020, the comprehensive score of the agricultural production level in Guangdong Province increased by 15%, but the agricultural resource guarantee of 80% of the cities decreased. In 2020, three cities with a high potential for agricultural green development contributed the most potential surplus to the province. In terms of the impact on the potential for green development in agriculture, the efficiency of agricultural resource utilization is greater than the agricultural ecological environment, the supply capacity of agricultural products, the degree of agricultural resource security, the level of agricultural material equipment, and the efficiency of agricultural production. Moreover, the impact of the six indicators varied across regions. From the perspective of spatial patterns, the agricultural production level in Guangdong presents a gradient change from the coastal areas of the Pearl River Delta to the surrounding areas, and the degree of guarantee of agricultural resources and environment shows a pattern of local concentration in cities with high and low guarantee degrees, respectively, and a large-scale east-west contiguous pattern in cities with medium guarantee degrees. Areas with low potential for agricultural green development in the province shifted to a regional distribution from 1990 to 2020. For cities with high population pressures and resource constraints, it is crucial to shift from relying on resource consumption to generating resources. For cities with solid resources and environmental protection capabilities, it is necessary to convert their potential for green agricultural development into a steady supply of high-quality agricultural products. Based on the above analysis, to address the pressing need for green and high-quality agricultural development in Guangdong, it is recommended to prioritize strengthening ecological environment zoning control, improving policies and regulations in key areas, accelerating technological innovation in green production, and establishing a sound mechanism for realizing the value of rural ecological resources. Efforts should be made to improve green agricultural production and resource utilization efficiency to promote Guangdong's high-quality construction of a modern agriculturally strong province with new productivity.

Key words: agricultural production, resource environment, development potential, cluster analysis, spatiotemporal pattern

摘要：

面向广东以新质生产力支撑新一轮高质量发展的机遇，为下一阶段新质生产力提升农业绿色发展水平寻找一条可行的实施路径，采用专家咨询法评估了广东省30年来（1990－2020）农业生产水平、资源环境保障度以及农业绿色发展潜力，建立了农业绿色发展潜力解释模型并探讨了其时空演变格局。结果表明，1990－2020年，广东省农业生产水平综合评分提升15%，但80%的城市农业资源保障度有所下降，2020年，农业绿色发展潜力较高的深圳、东莞和江门3个城市为全省贡献了大部分“盈余”。对农业绿色发展潜力的影响上，农业资源使用效率>农业生态环境>农产品供给能力>农业资源保障度>农业物质装备水平>农业生产效率，且6个指标的影响存在区域异质性。从空间格局看，广东农业生产水平呈现从珠三角沿海向周边递增的梯度变化；农业资源环境保障度则呈高、低保障度城市分别局部集中、中等保障度城市东西向大范围连片格局。全省农业绿色发展低潜力区从1990年的区域性分布转变为2020年的范围性分布。对于人口压力和资源约束“双高”的城市，亟需从依靠消耗资源向创造资源转变；对于资源环境保障能力强的城市，则需将农业绿色发展潜力转化为优质农产品的有效供给。基于以上分析，为了满足广东农业绿色高质量发展的迫切需求，建议从强化生态环境分区管控、健全重点领域政策法规、加快绿色生产科技创新以及建立健全乡村生态资源价值实现机制等4个方面，着力提升农业绿色生产水平与资源利用效率，以新质生产力推进广东高质量建设现代农业强省。

关键词: 农业生产, 资源环境, 发展潜力, 聚类分析, 时空格局

CLC Number:

HU Yunfei, TAO Liang, LUO Yiwen. The Influencing Factors and Spatial Pattern Evolution of the Potential for Green Agricultural Development in Guangdong Province[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(10): 1600-1611.

胡韵菲, 陶亮, 罗旖文. 广东省农业绿色发展潜力影响因素及空间格局演变[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(10): 1600-1611.

Figures/Tables 13

References 37

[1]	VERGAMINI D, OLIVIERI M, ANDREOLI M, et al., 2024. Simulating policy mixes to reduce soil erosion and land abandonment in marginal areas: A case study from the Liguria Region (Italy)[J]. Land Use Policy, 143: 107188.
[2]	HAZRANA J, MISHRA A K, 2024. Effect of input subsidies and extension services: Evidence from rice productivity in Bangladesh[J]. Food Policy, 125: 102628.
[3]	KARNER K, MITTER H, SINABELL F, et al., 2024. Participatory development of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for Austria’s agriculture and food systems[J]. Land Use Policy, 142: 107183.
[4]	PETTIGREW S, BOOTH L, FARRAR V, et al., 2024. An emerging food policy domain: The effects of autonomous transport technologies on food access and consumption[J]. Food Policy, 125: 102647.
[5]	常谕, 孙业红, 杨海龙, 等, 2023. 农户视角下农业文化遗产地生态产品的旅游价值实现路径——以广东潮州单丛茶文化系统为例[J]. 资源科学, 45(2): 428-440. DOI
	CHANG Y, SUN H Y, YANG H L, et al., 2023. Value realization paths of ecological products through tourism in agricultural heritage sites from the perspective of farmers: An example of the Dancong tea culture system in Chaozhou City[J]. Resources Science, 45(2): 428-440. DOI
[6]	陈婕, 2021. 农业机械化对广东潮州市农业发展的促进作用[J]. 农业工程技术, 41(5): 48-49.
	CHEN J, 2021. The Promoting Effect of Agricultural Mechanization on Agricultural Development in Chaozhou City, Guangdong Province[J]. Agricultural Engineering Technology, 41(5): 48-49.
[7]	崔晓菁, 白蕾, 杨潇, 2022. 海岸线 “占补平衡” 实践工作的思考[J]. 自然资源情报 (6): 8-12.
	CUI X J, BAI L, YANG X, 2022. Thoughts on the practice of coastline “Requisition-Compensation Balance”[J]. Natural Resources Information (6): 8-12.
[8]	付晶园, 王苍平, 金亚亚, 等, 2023. 甘肃省碳排放影响因素分析[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 41(12): 235-238.
	FU J Y, WANG C P, JIN Y Y, et al., 2023. Analysis of factors influencing carbon emissions in Gansu Province[J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization, 41(12): 235-238.
[9]	顾晟景, 周宏, 2022. 生产性服务业对农业全要素生产率的影响研究——基于中介效应的影响路径分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 43(3): 106-116.
	GU C J, ZHOU H, 2023. Study on the influence of producer services on agricultural total factor productivity: Analysis of the influence path based on mediating effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 43(3): 106-116.
[10]	管宁宁, 柳凌韵, 黄惠春, 2024. 农业产业链发展提高农业生产效率了吗?——基于服务视角的再考察[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 38(7): 13-21.
	GUAN N N, LIU L Y, HUANG H C, 2024. Does the development of agricultural industry chain in improve agricultural production efficiency?: A perspective from production service[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 38(7): 13-21.
[11]	广东统计年鉴, 2023. 自然地理\|气候[EB/OL]. 广东省情网, 2024-03-04. https://dfz.gd.gov.cn/sqyl/jbsq/content/post_4384863.html.
	Guangdong Statistical Yearbook, 2023. Natural Geography\|Climate[EB/OL]. Guangdong Province, Situation in Guangdong Province (dfz.gd.gov.cn), 2024-03-04. https://dfz.gd.gov.cn/sqyl/jbsq/content/post_4384863.html.
[12]	黄文庆, 2023. 广东省农业碳排放效率时空差异及驱动机制研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学: 28-31.
	HUANG W Q, 2023. A study of agricultural carbon emission efficiency and its determinants in Guangdong Province[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forest and Technology: 28-31.
[13]	黎颂雯, 陈泽凯, 张晓露, 等, 2024. 农村人口老龄化对农业发展影响的实证分析——以广东省为例[J]. 中国市场 (11): 16-20.
	LI S W, CHEN Z K, ZHANG X L, et al., 2024. Empirical analysis of the impact of rural population aging on agricultural development: A case study of Guangdong Province[J]. China Market (11): 16-20.
[14]	李靖, 张正尧, 毛翔飞, 等, 2016. 我国农业生产力布局评价及优化建议——基于资源环境承载力的分析[J]. 农业经济问题, 37(3): 26-33, 110.
	LI J, ZHANG Z R, MAO X F, et al., 2016. Evaluation and optimization suggestions for the layout of agricultural productivity in China: Analysis based on resource and environmental carrying capacity[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 37(3): 26-33, 110.
[15]	李姣, 李朗, 李科, 2022. 隐含水污染视角下的中国省际农业生态补偿标准研究[J]. 农业经济问题 (6): 106-121.
	LI J, LI L, LI K, 2022. Inter-provincial agricultural ecological compensation standards in China from the perspective of embodied water pollution[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy (6): 106-121.
[16]	李垚, 赵林, 宋小语, 等, 2024. 降碳减污视角下山东省农业绿色发展效率的时空格局与影响因素分析[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 40(3): 104-112.
	LI Y, ZHAO L, SONG X Y, et al., 2024. Spatio-temporal pattern and influencing factors of agricultural green development efficiency in Shandong Province under the perspective of reduction of pollution and carbon emissions[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 40(3): 104-112.
[17]	刘黎霞, 2023. 全国生态日从工业巨人到绿美样板, 广东的生态文明跨越发展之路[EB/OL]. [2024-06-05]. https://www.21jingji.com/article/20230815/herald/849a96029043e18ea02d60260e5a3d7a.html.
	LIU L X, 2023. National ecological day: From an industrial giant to a green and beautiful model, Guangdong's ecological civilization leaps across the development road[EB/OL]. [2024-06-05]. https://www.21jingji.com/article/20230815/herald/849a96029043e18ea02d60260e5a3d7a.html.
[18]	刘姗, 赵胜, 栾雁宁, 等, 2022. 基于 “五感体验” 的生态农业型主题游乐空间创意实践——以深圳欢乐田园追光农场乐园为例[J]. 西部旅游 (21): 44-47.
	LIU S, ZHAO S, LUAN Y N, et al., 2022. Creative practice of ecological agriculture themed amusement space based on “five senses experience”: Taking Shenzhen Happy Countryside Chasing Light Farm park as an example[J]. Western Travel (21): 44-47.
[19]	罗坤莉, 2023. 广东省水污染防治发展状况分析[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 41(12): 258-260.
	LUO K L, 2023. Analysis on the development status of water pollution prevention and control in Guangdong Province[J]. China Resources Comprehensive Utilization, 41(12): 258-260.
[20]	漆雁斌, 韩绍䶮, 邓鑫, 2020. 中国绿色农业发展: 生产水平测度、空间差异及收敛性分析[J]. 农业技术经济 (4): 51-65.
	QI Y B, HAN S Y, DENG X, 2020. Measurement, regional spatial difference and convergence analysis measurement, regional spatial difference and convergence analysis[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics (4): 51-65.
[21]	佘晓芫, 2024. 广东农垦农业现代化路径探究[J]. 中国农垦 (1): 47-51.
	SHE X Y, 2024. Exploration of the modernization path of Guangdong agricultural reclamation[J]. China State Farm (1): 47-51.
[22]	孙大元, 胡学应, 朱明鲲, 等, 2023. 智力支撑广东农业面源污染治理: 模式创建、实践成效与展望[J]. 农业研究与应用, 36(5): 88-95.
	SUN D Y, HU X Y, ZHU M K, et al., 2023. Intellectual support model in Guangdong agricultural non-point source pollution control: model creation, practical results and prospects[J]. Agricultural Research and Application, 36(5): 88-95.
[23]	孙进, 刘启强, 2020. 以科技赋能农业聚产业振兴乡村——专访广州艾米生态人工智能农业有限公司[J]. 广东科技, 29(10): 32-35.
	SUN J, LIU Q Q, 2020. Empowering agriculture, gathering industries, and revitalizing rural areas with technology: Interview with Guangzhou Amy Ecological Artificial Intelligence Agriculture Co., Ltd[J]. Guangdong Science & Technology, 29(10): 32-35.
[24]	孙眉, 赵博文, 2024. 跨“粤”向新再升级[N]. 农民日报, 2024-05-21(001).
	SUN M, ZHAO B W, 2024. Cross Guangdong to new and further upgrade[N]. Farmers Daily, 2024-05-21(001).
[25]	唐柳雯, 陈颖, 黎华联, 等, 2023. 一江春水向岭南千帆竞发海天阔——全国性金融机构为广东高质量发展谱写共赢新篇章[N]. 南方日报, 2023-04-26(T02).
	TANG L W, CHEN Y, LI H L, et al., 2023. A river of spring water flows towards Lingnan, with thousands of sails competing on the vast sea and sky: National financial institutions compose a win win new chapter for Guangdong’s high quality development[N]. Nan Fang Daily, 2023-04-26(T02).
[26]	王华, 陈慧华, 唐力生, 等, 2018. 气候变暖背景下广东冬种生产季气候资源和气象灾害的时空变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 29(1): 93-102.
	WANG H, CHEN H H, TANG L S, et al., 2018. Temporal and spatial change of climate resources and meteorological disasters under climate change during winter crop growing season in Guangdong Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29(1): 93-102.
[27]	习近平, 2024. 发展新质生产力是推动高质量发展的内在要求和重要着力点[J]. 创造, 32(6): 1-3.
	XI J P, 2024. Developing new quality productive forces is an inherent requirement and important focus for promoting high-quality development[J]. Creation, 32(6): 1-3.
[28]	夏苒若, 2023. 民族地区气候资源价值评估探究——以广东连南瑶族自治县为例[J]. 环境与发展, 35(1): 33-43.
	XIA R R, 2023. Study on the valuation of climate resources in ethnic regions: A case study of Liannan Yao Autonomous County in Guangdong Province[J]. Environment and Development, 35(1): 33-43.
[29]	幸红, 林鹏程, 2018. 刍议广东政府土壤污染修复治理现状与对策[J]. 江西理工大学学报, 39(4): 24-32.
	XING H, LIN P C, 2018. On the current situation and countermeasures of soil pollution remediation and management by the Guangdong government[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, 39(4): 24-32.
[30]	闫丽君, 2016. 基于熵值法的广东农业可持续发展评价研究[J]. 农村经济与科技, 27(15): 150-151, 164.
	YAN L J, 2016. Research on the evaluation of Guangdong agricultural sustainable development based on entropy method[J]. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 27(15): 150-151, 164.
[31]	姚小英, 王劲松, 王莺, 等, 2015. 广东近40年气候变化特征及对农业的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 31(26): 222-228. DOI
	YAO X Y, WANG J S, WANG Y, et al., 2015. Climate changing feature in recent 40 years in Guangdong and its impact on agriculture[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 31(26): 222-228. DOI
[32]	尤飞, 王秀芬, 2013. 中国区域农业现代化综合评价报告[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学出版社: 47-50.
	YOU F, WANG X F, 2013. Comprehensive evaluation report on regional agricultural modernization in China[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science Press: 47-50.
[33]	张保亮, 2022. 广州乡村地区农业生态景观评价与指引研究[J]. 智能城市, 8(5): 72-74.
	ZHANG B L, 2022. Research on evaluation and guidance of agricultural ecological landscape in rural areas of Guangzhou[J]. Intelligent City, 8(5): 72-74.
[34]	张清津, 2024. 农业服务业发展: 路径与趋势[J]. 中国农村经济 (5): 62-80.
	ZHANG Q J, 2024. Development of agricultural service industry: Paths and trends[J]. Chinese Rural Economy (5): 62-80.
[35]	赵文珺, 刘丽红, 2023. 山西省农业生态经济系统协调发展及障碍因子分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 44(10): 179-190.
	ZHAO W J, LIU L H, 2023. Analysis on the coordinated development and obstacle factors of agricultural eco-economic system in Shanxi Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 44(10): 179-190.
[36]	衷海燕, 林资龙, 黄耿, 等, 2020. 珠江三角洲传统农业景观变迁及其空间转移[J]. 农业考古 (6): 207-214.
	ZHONG H Y, LIN Z L, HUANG G, et al., 2020. Changes and spatial transfer of traditional agricultural landscape in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Agricultural Archaeology (6): 207-214.
[37]	周展, 2024. “嵌入式干预”: 县域特色农业发展中的政府行为研究——基于山西省X县西瓜产业的案例分析[J/OL]. 农业经济问题, 1-14 [2024-05-30]. https://doi.org/10.13246/j.cnki.iae.20240515.001.
	ZHOU Z, 2024. Embedded intervention: research in the development of county: Level characteristic agriculture based on the case analysis of watermelon industry in X county of Shanxi Province[J/OL]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 1-14 [2024-05-30]. https://doi.org/10.13246/j.cnki.iae.20240515.001.

目标层	准则层- 代码	指标层	权重
农业生产水平	农业物质装备水平-fac_l (0.28)	耕种收综合机械化率/%	0.04
		农机总动力/(10000 kW∙h)	0.05
		有效灌溉指数 ¹⁾	0.04
		节水灌溉指数 ²⁾	0.03
		人均农林牧渔业固定资产投资/万元	0.06
		每公顷农作物播种固定资产投资/万元	0.06
	农业生产效率- prod_e (0.38)	农村居民人均农林牧渔业产值/万元	0.10
		每公顷农地产值指数/万元³⁾	0.08
		粮食单产/(kg∙hm⁻²)	0.04
		农民人均农业经营收入贡献指数 ⁴⁾	0.08
		第一产业从业人员占常住人口比重/%	0.02
		农民人均纯收入/元	0.06
	农产品供给能力- supl_c (0.34)	人均粮食产量/kg	0.08
		人均猪牛羊肉产量/t	0.06
		人均牛奶产量/kg	0.05
		人均蔬菜产量/kg	0.07
		人均水产产量/kg	0.05
		人均油料产量/kg	0.03
农业资源环境保障度	农业资源保障度- resc_g (0.31)	耕地保有率 ⁵⁾	0.09
		人均水资源/m³	0.05
		农业用水保障度/(10⁵ m³∙hm⁻²)	0.06
		人均耕地面积/(1000 m²)	0.07
		农业减灾指数 ⁶⁾	0.04
	农业资源使用效率- reuti_e (0.38)	化肥使用经济效率/(10⁴ yuan ∙t⁻¹) ⁷⁾	0.09
		农业用水经济效率/(yuan∙m⁻³) ⁸⁾	0.08
		农业加工指数 ⁹⁾	0.08
		人均经营面积/(667 m²)	0.08
		农村用电经济效率/(yuan∙kW∙h⁻¹) ¹⁰⁾	0.05
	农业生态环境-eco_e (0.31)	总氮减排指数/(hm²∙t⁻¹) ¹¹⁾	0.06
		总磷减排指数/(hm²∙t⁻¹)	0.06
		复合肥减施指数/(hm²∙t⁻¹)	0.07
		农药控制指数/(hm²∙t⁻¹)	0.07
		农膜污染减排指数/(hm²∙t⁻¹)	0.05

目标层	准则层- 代码	指标层	权重
农业生产水平	农业物质装备水平-fac_l (0.28)	耕种收综合机械化率/%	0.04
		农机总动力/(10000 kW∙h)	0.05
		有效灌溉指数 ¹⁾	0.04
		节水灌溉指数 ²⁾	0.03
		人均农林牧渔业固定资产投资/万元	0.06
		每公顷农作物播种固定资产投资/万元	0.06
	农业生产效率- prod_e (0.38)	农村居民人均农林牧渔业产值/万元	0.10
		每公顷农地产值指数/万元³⁾	0.08
		粮食单产/(kg∙hm⁻²)	0.04
		农民人均农业经营收入贡献指数 ⁴⁾	0.08
		第一产业从业人员占常住人口比重/%	0.02
		农民人均纯收入/元	0.06
	农产品供给能力- supl_c (0.34)	人均粮食产量/kg	0.08
		人均猪牛羊肉产量/t	0.06
		人均牛奶产量/kg	0.05
		人均蔬菜产量/kg	0.07
		人均水产产量/kg	0.05
		人均油料产量/kg	0.03
农业资源环境保障度	农业资源保障度- resc_g (0.31)	耕地保有率 ⁵⁾	0.09
		人均水资源/m³	0.05
		农业用水保障度/(10⁵ m³∙hm⁻²)	0.06
		人均耕地面积/(1000 m²)	0.07
		农业减灾指数 ⁶⁾	0.04
	农业资源使用效率- reuti_e (0.38)	化肥使用经济效率/(10⁴ yuan ∙t⁻¹) ⁷⁾	0.09
		农业用水经济效率/(yuan∙m⁻³) ⁸⁾	0.08
		农业加工指数 ⁹⁾	0.08
		人均经营面积/(667 m²)	0.08
		农村用电经济效率/(yuan∙kW∙h⁻¹) ¹⁰⁾	0.05
	农业生态环境-eco_e (0.31)	总氮减排指数/(hm²∙t⁻¹) ¹¹⁾	0.06
		总磷减排指数/(hm²∙t⁻¹)	0.06
		复合肥减施指数/(hm²∙t⁻¹)	0.07
		农药控制指数/(hm²∙t⁻¹)	0.07
		农膜污染减排指数/(hm²∙t⁻¹)	0.05

变量	facl_l	prod_e	supl_c	resc_g	ru_e	eco_e	P_{_gda}
faci_l	1
prod_e	0.21*³⁾	1
supl_c	0.174	0.655	1
resc_g	−0.088	0.1	0.355***¹⁾	1
ru_e	−0.102	−0.03	−0.31***	0.006	1
eco_e	−0.204*	−0.154	0.246** ²⁾	0.364***	0.131	1
P_{_gda}	−0.411***	−0.497***	−0.485***	0.185*	0.586***	0.463***	1

变量	facl_l	prod_e	supl_c	resc_g	ru_e	eco_e	P_{_gda}
faci_l	1
prod_e	0.21*³⁾	1
supl_c	0.174	0.655	1
resc_g	−0.088	0.1	0.355***¹⁾	1
ru_e	−0.102	−0.03	−0.31***	0.006	1
eco_e	−0.204*	−0.154	0.246** ²⁾	0.364***	0.131	1
P_{_gda}	−0.411***	−0.497***	−0.485***	0.185*	0.586***	0.463***	1

变量	VIF	1/VIF
faci_l	1.115	0.897
prod_e	2.547	0.393
supl_c	3.305	0.303
resc_g	1.291	0.775
ru_e	1.380	0.725
eco_e	1.644	0.608
Mean	1.880	0.617

The Influencing Factors and Spatial Pattern Evolution of the Potential for Green Agricultural Development in Guangdong Province

广东省农业绿色发展潜力影响因素及空间格局演变

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 37

Related Articles 4

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

变量	POOL模型	FE模型	RE模型	时间固定效应	双向固定效应
faci_l	−0.036* ³⁾(−1.991)	−0.046 (−1.287)	−0.036* (−1.991)	−0.043** (−2.524)	−0.054** (−2.040)
prod_e	−0.023** (−2.008)	−0.033** (−2.452)	−0.023** ²⁾(−2.008)	−0.032** (−2.582)	−0.085*** (−2.712)
supl_c	−0.047***¹⁾(−4.041)	−0.042*** (−2.748)	−0.047*** (−4.041)	−0.039*** (−3.827)	−0.004 (−0.167)
resc_g	0.037*** (6.379)	0.036*** (4.849)	0.037*** (6.379)	0.039*** (3.970)	0.059*** (3.893)
ru_e	0.053*** (5.506)	0.036*** (2.741)	0.053*** (5.506)	0.061*** (4.317)	0.044*** (3.673)
eco_e	0.050*** (4.629)	0.056*** (4.203)	0.050*** (4.629)	0.049*** (5.325)	0.068*** (5.203)
r²	0.779	0.752	0.779	0.772	0.540
r²(within)	0.704	0.718	0.704	0.701	0.628
N	83	83	83	83	83
检验	F(6, 76)=30.610, p=0.000	F(6, 56)=12.777, p=0.000	χ²(6)=183.658, p=0.000	F(6, 73)=40.104, p=0.000	F(6, 53)=16.609, p=0.000

检验类型	检验目的	检验值	检验结论
F检验	FE模型和POOL 模型比较选择	F (20, 56)=0.917, p=0.569	POOL 模型
BP检验	RE模型和POOL 模型比较选择	χ²(1)=0.371, p=0.271	POOL 模型
Hausman 检验	FE模型和RE 模型比较选择	χ²(5)=2.344, p=0.800	RE模型

变量	基准模型 (POOL模型)	OLS回归模型	Robust回归模型
faci_l	−0.036* (−1.991)	−0.036*** (−3.113)	−0.026*** (−6.497)
prod_e	−0.023** (−2.008)	−0.023 (−1.714)	−0.036*** (−7.464)
supl_c	−0.047*** (−4.041)	−0.047*** (−4.044)	−0.024*** (−5.906)
resc_g	0.037*** (6.379)	0.037*** (2.992)	0.030*** (6.867)
ru_e	0.053*** (5.506)	0.053*** (6.133)	0.042*** (13.851)
eco_e	0.050*** (4.629)	0.050*** (5.545)	0.030*** (9.343)
r²	0.779	0.779	0.715
r²(within)	0.704	0.761	0.692
N	83	83	83
检验	F(6, 76)=30.610, p=0.000	F(6, 76)=44.535, p=0.000	F(6, 76)=31.770, p=0.000

变量	广东	珠三角	粤东	粤西	粤北
faci_l	−0.036* (−1.991)	−0.048 (−1.855)	−0.026** (−2.539)	−0.019* (−2.213)	−0.025 (−0.954)
prod_e	−0.023** (−2.008)	−0.027 (−0.911)	−0.031** (−2.496)	−0.006 (−0.579)	−0.036 (−0.870)
supl_c	−0.047*** (−4.041)	−0.036 (−1.550)	−0.042** (−2.347)	−0.040** (−3.317)	−0.055 (−1.693)
resc_g	0.037*** (6.379)	0.045* (2.020)	0.044** (3.033)	0.038*** (3.878)	0.040 (0.978)
ru_e	0.053*** (5.506)	0.062*** (3.928)	0.030 (1.709)	0.017* (2.249)	0.020 (0.607)
eco_e	0.050*** (4.629)	0.059*** (2.877)	0.044*** (4.155)	0.021*** (4.139)	0.048*** (3.293)
r²	0.779	0.766	0.955	0.976	0.887
r²(within)	0.704	0.718	0.925	0.957	0.812
N	83	36	16	15	16
检验	F(6, 76)=30.610, p=0.000	F(6, 29)=15.831, p=0.000	F(6, 9)=31.786, p=0.000	F(6, 8)=53.171, p=0.000	F(6, 9)=11.787, p=0.001

[1]	ZHANG Weichen, WANG Xingqi, WANG Bojie. Spatiotemporal Pattern and Influencing Factors of the Ecosystem Services in the Tabu River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(7): 1142-1152.
[2]	YAO Fulong, HUANG Jian, YAN Junjie, LIU Haijun, TANG Guoqian. The Assemblages of Surface Pollen and Their Ecological Significance from Major Meadow Communities Along the North Slope of Tianshan [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(7): 1350-1359.
[3]	XIANG Hengxing, ZHANG Jian, WANG Zongming, MAO Dehua. Relationships between Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services in the Songnen Plain [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(8): 1769-1776.
[4]	YUAN Jie, ZHAO Yanqiang. Trends in Research on Wetland Restoration based on Web of Science Database [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(7): 1541-1548.