生态环境学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 425-436.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.03.009
黄绍强1(
), 江恒2, 余世钦3, 蒋新宇2,*(
), 程炯2, 陈三雄1,*(
)
收稿日期:2025-06-10
修回日期:2025-10-21
接受日期:2025-12-10
出版日期:2026-03-18
发布日期:2026-03-13
通讯作者:
*E-mail: 作者简介:黄绍强(1999年生),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为土壤结构改良、水土保持与荒漠化防治。E-mail: 18943093171@163.com
基金资助:
HUANG Shaoqiang1(
), JIANG Heng2, YU Shiqin3, JIANG Xinyu2,*(
), CHENG Jiong2, CHEN Sanxiong1,*(
)
Received:2025-06-10
Revised:2025-10-21
Accepted:2025-12-10
Online:2026-03-18
Published:2026-03-13
摘要:
由于长期受到高温与强降雨影响,华南红壤土壤结构较差,具有“酸、黏、瘦”的特点。其中,土壤团聚体水稳性较差是红壤结构退化的核心问题。小球藻作为一种可持续的、无污染的、高效的土壤生物改良剂,近年来引起了学者们的广泛关注。以赤红壤、砖红壤作为供试土壤,通过室内土培实验探究小球藻对广东赤红壤与砖红壤团聚体水稳性及胞外聚合物(EPS)的调控机制。结果表明,施加活性小球藻能够显著提高两类红壤团聚体水稳定性。赤红壤与砖红壤高施加量组(Z3)的平均质量直径(MMD)分别较对照组提升44.0%和21.9%,几何平均直径(GMD)分别增加41.8%和40.6%,且粒径>0.25 mm水稳性团聚体占比(R0.25)提升12.6%和21.6%。灭活处理组因小球藻丧失代谢活性,团聚体改良效果不稳定。土壤EPS质量分数呈现剂量依赖性,活性处理组砖红壤EPS质量分数较对照提升49.7%。活与灭活小球藻处理的效果差异表明,生物活性是小球藻长效调控的关键因素。相关性分析显示,团聚体稳定性与土壤肥力性状、生态环境性状呈显著正相关。研究证实微藻可以通过代谢分泌EPS与改善土壤微环境的协同作用,增强红壤结构稳定性,这为亚热带退化红壤的生态修复提供了新型生物调控策略。
中图分类号:
黄绍强, 江恒, 余世钦, 蒋新宇, 程炯, 陈三雄. 小球藻对广东红壤团聚体水稳性及其胞外聚合物组分的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(3): 425-436.
HUANG Shaoqiang, JIANG Heng, YU Shiqin, JIANG Xinyu, CHENG Jiong, CHEN Sanxiong. Effects of Chlorella Vulgaris on Water Stability of Soil Aggregates and Extracellular Polymeric Substance Components in Red Soils of Guangdong[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(3): 425-436.
| 土壤 | 处理 | OM质量分数/ (g·kg-1) | TN质量分数/ (g·kg-1) | TP质量分数/ % | TK质量分数/ % | AP质量分数/ (mg·kg-1) | AK质量分数/ (mg·kg-1) | MC/ % | pH | Chla质量分数/ (mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 赤红壤 | CK | 18.52±0.55d | 1.41±0.08d | 0.18±0.03c | 0.85±0.05b | 7.08±0.55d | 98.3±8.2d | 10.25 ± 0.34 c | 4.26±0.28c | 32.67±12.40c |
| ZL1 | 20.30±0.62cd | 1.53±0.09cd | 0.22±0.04bc | 0.88±0.06b | 12.40±1.10c | 110.5±9.5c | 12.38±0.38c | 4.36±0.58c | 66.04±10.67b | |
| ZL2 | 21.42±0.71bc | 1.67±0.11bc | 0.25±0.05b | 0.92±0.07ab | 19.05±1.60bc | 130.2±8.8b | 14.25±0.58c | 4.10±0.13c | 65.00±8.32b | |
| ZL3 | 22.15±0.80b | 1.78±0.12b | 0.27±0.05ab | 0.95±0.08b | 23.90±1.90ab | 150.0±10.2ab | 15.63±0.57b | 4.56±0.40c | 64.63±8.90b | |
| Z1 | 23.85±0.73b | 1.92±0.11bc | 0.31±0.06ab | 1.02±0.09a | 24.80±2.10ab | 155.2±10.5ab | 18.43±0.33b | 4.25±0.07c | 90.80±14.85ab | |
| Z2 | 26.70±0.95a | 2.15±0.14ab | 0.35±0.07a | 1.10±0.10a | 28.30±2.40a | 165.2±10.5a | 21.60±0.47a | 5.00±0.14b | 87.34±15.61ab | |
| Z3 | 29.80±1.10a | 2.40±0.16a | 0.38±0.08a | 1.15±0.12a | 31.50±2.80a | 182.5±12.0a | 23.89±0.57a | 5.65±0.06a | 139.07±20.96a | |
| 砖红壤 | CK | 22.58±0.45d | 1.87±0.75c | 0.25±0.04c | 0.90±0.06b | 8.15±0.60d | 105.0±9.0d | 11.84±0.96d | 4.14±0.08d | 85.34±12.45d |
| ZL1 | 24.30±0.55cd | 2.05±0.12bc | 0.28±0.05bc | 0.94±0.07ab | 14.20±1.20c | 125.5±10.5c | 13.75±0.4c | 4.28±0.25c | 91.98±4.56c | |
| ZL2 | 25.80±0.6bc | 2.20±0.14b | 0.32±0.06ab | 0.98±0.08ab | 20.80±1.80b | 145.2±11.0b | 15.90±0.52b | 4.15±0.11cd | 93.16±3.23bc | |
| ZL3 | 26.80±0.82b | 2.35±0.16ab | 0.34±0.07ab | 1.02±0.09a | 23.90±1.90ab | 160.0±12.5ab | 17.85±0.54a | 4.34±0.37d | 92.88±3.07bc | |
| Z1 | 28.40±0.85ab | 2.50±0.18ab | 0.36±0.07a | 1.05±0.10a | 26.50±2.20ab | 175.3±13.2ab | 21.40±0.70a | 4.22±0.11c | 99.51±7.54b | |
| Z2 | 33.20±1.05a | 2.65±0.15a | 0.38±0.08a | 1.12±0.11a | 35.20±2.80a | 330.0±18.6a | 25.75±0.64a | 4.99±0.11a | 106.28±12.34a | |
| Z3 | 36.50±1.20a | 2.85±0.20a | 0.40±0.09a | 1.18±0.12a | 38.50±3.20a | 350.5±20.0a | 28.95±0.46a | 5.61±0.07a | 137.17±24.35a |
表1 不同的小球藻活性与施加量处理对土壤理化性质的影响
Table 1 Effects of different chlorella vulgaris activities and application rates on soil physicochemical properties
| 土壤 | 处理 | OM质量分数/ (g·kg-1) | TN质量分数/ (g·kg-1) | TP质量分数/ % | TK质量分数/ % | AP质量分数/ (mg·kg-1) | AK质量分数/ (mg·kg-1) | MC/ % | pH | Chla质量分数/ (mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 赤红壤 | CK | 18.52±0.55d | 1.41±0.08d | 0.18±0.03c | 0.85±0.05b | 7.08±0.55d | 98.3±8.2d | 10.25 ± 0.34 c | 4.26±0.28c | 32.67±12.40c |
| ZL1 | 20.30±0.62cd | 1.53±0.09cd | 0.22±0.04bc | 0.88±0.06b | 12.40±1.10c | 110.5±9.5c | 12.38±0.38c | 4.36±0.58c | 66.04±10.67b | |
| ZL2 | 21.42±0.71bc | 1.67±0.11bc | 0.25±0.05b | 0.92±0.07ab | 19.05±1.60bc | 130.2±8.8b | 14.25±0.58c | 4.10±0.13c | 65.00±8.32b | |
| ZL3 | 22.15±0.80b | 1.78±0.12b | 0.27±0.05ab | 0.95±0.08b | 23.90±1.90ab | 150.0±10.2ab | 15.63±0.57b | 4.56±0.40c | 64.63±8.90b | |
| Z1 | 23.85±0.73b | 1.92±0.11bc | 0.31±0.06ab | 1.02±0.09a | 24.80±2.10ab | 155.2±10.5ab | 18.43±0.33b | 4.25±0.07c | 90.80±14.85ab | |
| Z2 | 26.70±0.95a | 2.15±0.14ab | 0.35±0.07a | 1.10±0.10a | 28.30±2.40a | 165.2±10.5a | 21.60±0.47a | 5.00±0.14b | 87.34±15.61ab | |
| Z3 | 29.80±1.10a | 2.40±0.16a | 0.38±0.08a | 1.15±0.12a | 31.50±2.80a | 182.5±12.0a | 23.89±0.57a | 5.65±0.06a | 139.07±20.96a | |
| 砖红壤 | CK | 22.58±0.45d | 1.87±0.75c | 0.25±0.04c | 0.90±0.06b | 8.15±0.60d | 105.0±9.0d | 11.84±0.96d | 4.14±0.08d | 85.34±12.45d |
| ZL1 | 24.30±0.55cd | 2.05±0.12bc | 0.28±0.05bc | 0.94±0.07ab | 14.20±1.20c | 125.5±10.5c | 13.75±0.4c | 4.28±0.25c | 91.98±4.56c | |
| ZL2 | 25.80±0.6bc | 2.20±0.14b | 0.32±0.06ab | 0.98±0.08ab | 20.80±1.80b | 145.2±11.0b | 15.90±0.52b | 4.15±0.11cd | 93.16±3.23bc | |
| ZL3 | 26.80±0.82b | 2.35±0.16ab | 0.34±0.07ab | 1.02±0.09a | 23.90±1.90ab | 160.0±12.5ab | 17.85±0.54a | 4.34±0.37d | 92.88±3.07bc | |
| Z1 | 28.40±0.85ab | 2.50±0.18ab | 0.36±0.07a | 1.05±0.10a | 26.50±2.20ab | 175.3±13.2ab | 21.40±0.70a | 4.22±0.11c | 99.51±7.54b | |
| Z2 | 33.20±1.05a | 2.65±0.15a | 0.38±0.08a | 1.12±0.11a | 35.20±2.80a | 330.0±18.6a | 25.75±0.64a | 4.99±0.11a | 106.28±12.34a | |
| Z3 | 36.50±1.20a | 2.85±0.20a | 0.40±0.09a | 1.18±0.12a | 38.50±3.20a | 350.5±20.0a | 28.95±0.46a | 5.61±0.07a | 137.17±24.35a |
图1 土壤团聚体平均质量直径、几何平均直径、R0.25 左列图为砖红壤,右列图为赤红壤。a、b图描述土壤团聚体几何平均直径;c、d图描述土壤团聚体平均质量直径;e、f图描述土壤团聚体R0.25。误差线表示标准误差。不相同小写字母表示处理间在(p<0.05,n=4)水平上存在显著差异
Figure 1 Mean mass diameter, geometric mean diameter, and R0.25 of soil aggregates
图4 土壤胞外聚合物(EPS)质量分数 左列图为砖红壤,右列图为赤红壤。a、b图描述土壤胞外聚合物质量分数;c、d图描述土壤胞外聚合物的蛋白质组分质量分数;e、f描述土壤胞外聚合物多糖组分质量分数。误差线表示标准误差。不同小写字母表示不同藻液梯度的土壤EPS质量分数在(p<0.05,n=4)水平上存在显著差异
Figure 4 Content of extracellular polymeric substances in soil
| [1] | AHMAD A, MARTSINOVICH N, 2023. Atomic-scale modelling of organic matter in soil: adsorption of organic molecules and biopolymers on the hydroxylated α-Al2O3 (0001) surface[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 381(2250): 20220254. |
| [2] | BAO S D, 2007. Soil agro-chemistrical analysis[M]. the 3rd edition. Beijing: China Agriculture Press. |
| [3] |
BISWAS B, CHAKRABORTY D, TIMSINA J, et al., 2022. Agroforestry offers multiple ecosystem services in degraded lateritic soils[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365: 132768.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
BRADFORD M M, 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding[J]. Analytical Biochemistry, 72(1-2): 248-254.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
CHEN C F, SINGH A K, YANG B, et al., 2023. Effect of termite mounds on soil microbial communities and microbial processes: Implications for soil carbon and nitrogen cycling[J]. Geoderma, 431: 116368.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
COSTA O Y, RAAIJMAKERS J M, KURAMAE E E, 2018. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: ecological function and impact on soil aggregation[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9: 1636.
DOI PMID |
| [7] |
DUBOIS M, GILLES K A, HAMILTON J K, et al., 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 28(3): 350-356.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
ELLIOTT E T, 1986. Aggregate structure and carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in native and cultivated soils[J]. Soil science society of America journal, 50(3): 627-633.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
HASSLER C S, ALASONATI E, NICHOLS C M, et al., 2011. Exopolysaccharides produced by bacteria isolated from the pelagic Southern Ocean—Role in Fe binding, chemical reactivity, and bioavailability[J]. Marine Chemistry, 123(1-4): 88-98.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
HE Y B, GU F, XU C, et al., 2019. Assessing of the influence of organic and inorganic amendments on the physical-chemical properties of a red soil (Ultisol) quality[J]. CATENA, 183: 104231.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
KARIMI A, TAHMOURESPOUR A, HOODAJI M, 2023. The formation of biocrust and improvement of soil properties by the exopolysaccharide-producing cyanobacterium: a biogeotechnological study[J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 13(17): 15489-15499.
DOI |
| [12] |
ISSA M O, DÉFARGE C, LE BISSONNAIS Y, et al., 2007. Effects of the inoculation of cyanobacteria on the microstructure and the structural stability of a tropical soil[J]. Plant and Soil, 290: 209-219.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
MUSTAFA A, XU M G, SHAH S, et al., 2020. Soil aggregation and soil aggregate stability regulate organic carbon and nitrogen storage in a red soil of southern China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 270(48): 110894.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
NISHA R, KAUSHIK A, KAUSHIK C P, 2007. Effect of indigenous cyanobacterial application on structural stability and productivity of an organically poor semi-arid soil[J]. Geoderma, 138(1-2): 49-56.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
PENG J, YANG Q S, ZHANG C Y, et al., 2023. Aggregate pore structure, stability characteristics, and biochemical properties induced by different cultivation durations in the Mollisol region of Northeast China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 233: 105797.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
REN L J, YANG H, LI J, et al., 2025. Organic fertilizer enhances soil aggregate stability by altering greenhouse soil content of iron oxide and organic carbon[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 24(1): 306-321.
DOI |
| [17] |
RITCHIE R J, 2006. Consistent sets of spectrophotometric chlorophyll equations for acetone, methanol and ethanol solvents[J]. Photosynthesis research, 89: 27-41.
DOI PMID |
| [18] |
SHANTHAKUMAR S, ABINANDAN S, VENKATESWARLU K, et al., 2021. Algalization of acid soils with acid‐tolerant strains: Improvement in pH, carbon content, exopolysaccharides, indole acetic acid and dehydrogenase activity[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 32(11): 3157-3166.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
SHENG M H, AI X Y, HUANG B C, et al., 2023. Effects of biochar additions on the mechanical stability of soil aggregates and their role in the dynamic renewal of aggregates in slope ecological restoration[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 898: 165478.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
SONSRI K, WATANABE A, 2023. Insights into the formation and stability of soil aggregates in relation to the structural properties of dissolved organic matter from various organic amendments[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 232: 105774.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
YAN Q T, LIN X Y, CHEN Z B, et al., 2023. Biosynthesis of bionanomaterials using Bacillus cereus for the recovery of rare earth elements from mine wastewater[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 329: 117098.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
ZHANG J E, FENG L F, OUYANG Y, et al., 2020. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and fungi in relation to phosphorus availability under different land uses for some latosols from Guangdong, China[J]. CATENA, 195: 104686.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
ZHOU Y, CUI X C, WU B B, et al., 2024. Microalgal extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and their roles in cultivation, biomass harvesting, and bioproducts extraction[J]. Bioresource Technology, 406: 131054.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
阿拉萨, 高广磊, 丁国栋, 等, 2022. 土壤微生物膜生理生态功能研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 33(7): 1885-1892.
DOI |
| GAO G L, DING G D, et al., 2022. Eco-physiological functions of soil microbial biofilms: A review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 33(7): 1885-1892. | |
| [25] | 崔丽洋, 谢茜, 毛青, 等, 2023. 土壤微藻对盐胁迫的响应及其对盐渍化土壤的改良作用[J]. 地球科学, 48(11): 4270-4278. |
| CUI L Y, XIE Q, MAO Q, et al., 2023. Response of soil microalgae to salt stress and its improvement effect on salinized soil[J]. Earth Science, 48(11): 4270-4278. | |
| [26] | 崔岩, 边建文, 刘瑛, 等, 2023. 微藻多糖及其衍生物在农业领域的研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 54(5): 1226-1236. |
| CUI Y, BIAN J W, LIU Y, et al., 2023. Research progress of microalgae polysaccharides and their derivatives in agriculture[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 54(5): 1226-1236. | |
| [27] | 方映涵, 李双龙, 翟金磊, 等, 2025. 硅藻土对稻田土壤团聚体组成及其碳氮储量的影响[J]. 农业现代化研究, 46(2): 366-375. |
| FANG Y H, LI S L, ZHAI J L, et al., 2025. Effects of diatomit on soil aggregate composition and carbon and nitrogen storage in paddy soil[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 46(2): 366-375. | |
| [28] | 廖燕凤, 周家昊, 颜昕煜, 等, 2025. 胞外聚合物 (EPS) 稳定土壤团聚体与有机碳的作用机制研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 37(1): 1-18. |
| LIAO Y F, ZHOU J H, YAN X Y, et al., 2025. Research progress on the mechanisms of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in stabilizing soil aggregates and organic carbon[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 37(1): 1-18. | |
| [29] | 刘霞, 张欢, 胡宇, 等, 2024. 菌藻肥与脱硫石膏复配对盐碱土壤质量及高丹草产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料 (10): 127-135. |
| LIU X, ZHANG H, HU Y, et al., 2024. The effect of fungal fertilizer and desulfurization gypsum combined application on the quality of saline-alkali soil and the yield of pacesetter[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China (10): 127-135. | |
| [30] | 罗光宏, 崔岩, 刘海燕, 等, 2024. 施用微藻肥对两类草本作物生长及土壤性质的影响[J]. 生物学杂志, 42(4): 72-77. |
| LUO G H, CUI Y, LIU H Y, et al., 2024. Effects of microalgae fertilizer on the growth of two types of herb crops and soil properties[J]. Journal of Biology, 42(4): 72-77. | |
| [31] | 梁志波, 刘平英, 周有彩, 等, 2023. 5种培养基对蛋白核小球藻生长及其产物合成的影响[J]. 福建师范大学学报(自然科学版), 39(1): 93-100. |
| LIANG Z B, LIU P Y, ZHOU Y C et al., 2023. Effects of Five Media on the Growth and Product Synthesis of Chlorella pyrenoidosa[J]. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 39(1): 93-100. | |
| [32] | 马征, 李振轮, 杨裕然, 等, 2025. 土壤生物驱动团聚体形成及稳定的机制与相关应用研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 39(1): 1-18. |
| MA Z, LI Z L, YANG Y R, et al., 2025. Research progress on the mechanism and related application of soil bio-driven aggregates formation and Stability[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 39(1): 1-18. | |
| [33] | 曲植, 席梓轩, 李佳宇, 等, 2025. 小球藻与放线菌联用对促进风沙土养分转化与减缓水分入渗的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 41(2): 146-154. |
| QU Z, XI Z X, LI J Y, et al., 2025. Impacts of the combined use of Chlorella and actinomycetes on the nutrient transformation and water infiltration characteristics of aeolian sandy soil[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 41(2): 146-154. | |
| [34] | 童灵, 张雪, 张思文, 等, 2021. 有机质和粒径对中国4类典型土壤镁吸附量的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 26(6): 150-158. |
| TONG L, ZHANG X, ZHANG S W, et al., 2021. Effects of organic matter and particle size on magnesium adsorption capacity of four types of soils in China[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 26(6): 150-158. | |
| [35] | 王建华, 圆圆, 都拉娜, 等, 2023. 微藻生物肥改善土壤肥力提高叶用莴苣营养品质[J]. 中南农业科技, 44(7): 3-5. |
| WANG J H, YUAN Y, DOU L N, et al., 2023. Improvement of soil fertility and enhancement of nutritional quality of leaf lettuce by microalgal biofertilizer[J]. South-Central Agricultural Science and Technology, 44(7): 3-5. | |
| [36] | 徐华勤, 章家恩, 孟磊, 等, 2011. 模拟酸雨胁迫对赤红壤磷素形态特征的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 30(11): 2319-2324. |
| XU H Q, ZHANG J, MENG L, et al., 2011. Effect of simulated acid rain in situ on characteristics and fractionation of phosphorus in lateritic red soils[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 30(11): 2319-2324. | |
| [37] | 徐晓钰, 王涵, PHYU K, 等, 2024. 微藻生物肥施用对 “土壤-作物” 系统的影响及修复作用[J]. 中国土壤与肥料 (9): 208-218. |
| XU X Y, WANG H, PHYU K, et al., 2024. Effects and remediation of microalgal biofertilizer application on “soil-crop” system[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China (9): 208-218. | |
| [38] |
冀建华, 吕真真, 刘淑珍, 等, 2024. 长期施用化肥对南方稻田土壤酸化和盐基离子损失的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 57(13): 2599-2611.
DOI |
|
JI J H, LU Z Z, LIU S Z et al., 2024. Long-Term Application of Chemical Fertilizers Induces Soil Acidification and Soil Exchangeable Base Cation Loss on Paddy in Southern China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 57(13): 2599-2611.
DOI |
|
| [39] | 张鹏, 谢修鸿, 李翠兰, 等, 2019. 我国几种地带性土壤中磷素形态的研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 39(10): 3210-3216. |
|
ZHANG P, XIE X H, LI C L, et al., 2019. Forms of phosphorus in several zonal soils of China[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 39(10): 3210-3216.
DOI |
|
| [40] | 张杰, 周佳, 王永敏, 等, 2025. 不同有机肥对酸性土壤团聚体形成稳定及周转的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 39(1): 1-17. |
| ZHANG J, ZHOU J, WANG Y M, et al., 2025. Effects of different organic fertilizers on the formation, stabilization, and turnover of aggregates in acidic soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 39(1): 1-17. |
| [1] | 李彦霖, 徐红伟, 徐琳, 骆紫藤, 袁亚玲, 谭波. 带状改造对柳杉人工林土壤水稳性团聚体组成及稳定性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(2): 223-231. |
| [2] | 孔小云, 张永坤, 李润杰, 李颖, 林成清, 马占明, 辛继林, 杨晓璇, 党怡乐, 赵家艺, 冯玲正, 周燕. 湟水河流域耕地土壤团聚体有机碳空间变异特征及其驱动因素分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(11): 1715-1727. |
| [3] | 李玉彩, 杨垒, 梁贤, 孟红艳, 刘焕焕, 石辉, 任勇翔. 基于转录组学揭示腐殖酸影响纳米三氧化二铬对小球藻的毒性机制[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(8): 1289-1297. |
| [4] | 李海鹏, 黄月华, 孙晓东, 曹启民, 符芳兴, 孙楚涵. 海南农田不同质地砖红壤及其细菌群落与番茄青枯病发生的关联分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(6): 1062-1069. |
| [5] | 李传福, 朱桃川, 明玉飞, 杨宇轩, 高舒, 董智, 李永强, 焦树英. 有机肥与脱硫石膏对黄河三角洲盐碱地土壤团聚体及其有机碳组分的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(5): 878-888. |
| [6] | 周沁苑, 董全民, 王芳草, 刘玉祯, 冯斌, 杨晓霞, 俞旸, 张春平, 曹铨, 刘文亭. 放牧方式对高寒草地瑞香狼毒根际土壤团聚体及有机碳特征的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(4): 660-667. |
| [7] | 朱生堡, 唐光木, 张云舒, 徐万里, 葛春辉, 马海刚. 水旱长期耕作下土壤团聚体及有机碳动态变化[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(11): 2152-2160. |
| [8] | 刘红梅, 李睿颖, 高晶晶, 朱平, 路杨, 高洪军, 张贵龙, 张秀芝, 彭畅, 杨殿林. 保护性耕作对土壤团聚体及微生物学特性的影响研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(6): 1277-1284. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||