基于CiteSpace的生态安全格局研究进展

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.04.022

生态环境学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 835-844.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.04.022

基于CiteSpace的生态安全格局研究进展

魏建兵^*(), 郑泓, 程雨露, 王阳

沈阳大学环境学院/区域污染环境生态修复教育部重点实验室,辽宁沈阳 110044

收稿日期:2021-11-24 出版日期:2022-04-18 发布日期:2022-06-22
通讯作者: *
作者简介:魏建兵（1972年生）,男,教授,博士,博士研究生导师,主要从事景观生态学、区域生态规划与生态修复教学和科研工作。E-mail: oliver1208@sina.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41771200);国家自然科学基金项目(41171399)

Advances in Research of Ecological Security Patterns, Based on CiteSpace

WEI Jianbing^*(), ZHENG Hong, CHENG Yulu, WANG Yang

Key Laboratory of Eco-Restoration of Regional Contaminated Environment (Ministry of Education), Shenyang University, Shenyang, 110044, China

Received:2021-11-24 Online:2022-04-18 Published:2022-06-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生态安全格局自上世纪九十年代中期以来成为区域景观设计和国土规划等领域生态建设和环境保护研究的热点,众多著名科技期刊和学者开始关注这个领域,取得了大量研究成果,但在理论、方法创新和应用方向等方面的系统总结还较为缺乏。基于CiteSpace软件,以CNKI与WOS数据库中最新的378篇生态安全格局相关文献为研究对象,对国内外生态安全格局研究现状及发展态势进行总结和讨论,旨在为生态安全格局构建理论研究与工程实践提供借鉴。研究发现,2014年以后为国内外研究的蓬勃发展期,此阶段发表的文献成果呈指数增长,占到截至2021年8月10日全部检索文献的77.8%。生态安全格局研究的学科主要为资源环境领域的环境科学和生态学,占比达到44.37%。国际期刊Landscape Urban Plan为被引频次最高期刊,国内期刊《生态学报》具有较高的影响力,共引频次分别达到57和45。国内外高被引文献作者大多为中国学者,中国学者在此领域作出了较大的贡献。生态廊道和生态网络始终是区域生态安全格局构建研究中的热点。未来,丰富生态安全格局识别的方法、生态安全格局的尺度效应、具有生态韧性的弹性网络构建是有待深入探讨的主题。基于关键生态过程,综合考虑生态、经济和社会效益的多目标,社会-文化-生态系统耦合的生态安全格局构建与优化,服务于国家重大生态建设发展战略等理论和方法的进一步创新是生态安全格局研究可持续发展的重点方向。

关键词: 生态安全格局, CiteSpace软件, 可视化文献计量分析, 知识图谱, 聚类分析

Abstract:

Since the mid-1990s, ecological security pattern has gained popularity in the research on ecological construction and environmental protection in the fields of regional landscape design and land planning. Despite abundant research findings and the attention given to this area by many famous scientific and technical journals and scholars, there is still a lack of systematic summaries and analyses for innovating theories, methods, and applications in this field. We used the CiteSpace software to analyze 378 recent publications related to ecological security pattern from CNKI and WOS databases. This paper discusses the trends of ecological security pattern research at home and abroad, aiming to provide references for theoretical research and engineering practices in this field. Research in this area, both at home and abroad, had rapidly increased since 2014, accounting for 77.8% of all publications retrieved from the establishment of the database as of August 10, 2021. These studies were mainly conducted in the disciplines of environmental sciences and ecology related to resources and the environment, accounting for 44.37% of all ecological security pattern research within 15 disciplines. The highly influential and most frequently cited journals included Landscape Urban Plan and Acta Ecologica Sinica (Chinese Journal) that had 57 and 45 citations, respectively. Most authors of highly cited literature were Chinese scholars, who had made great contributions in this field. Ecological corridor and networks had been the primary research focus for the construction of regional ecological security pattern. The enrichment of identification methods for ecological security patterns, their scale effects, and the construction of an elastic network with ecological resilience needs to be explored in depth in the future research. The construction and optimization of ecological security patterns based on key ecological processes, a multi-objective and socio-cultural coupling ecosystems that integrate ecological, economic, and social benefits, and the further innovation of theories and methods for the national major ecological construction strategies are the key directions for the sustainable development of ecological security pattern research.

Key words: ecological security pattern, CiteSpace software, visual bibliometric literature analysis, knowledge graph, clustering analysis

中图分类号:

Q148
X171.4

魏建兵, 郑泓, 程雨露, 王阳. 基于CiteSpace的生态安全格局研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 835-844.

WEI Jianbing, ZHENG Hong, CHENG Yulu, WANG Yang. Advances in Research of Ecological Security Patterns, Based on CiteSpace[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(4): 835-844.

图/表 11

参考文献 63

[1]	AZAM A, AHMED A, WANG H, et al., 2021. Knowledge structure and research progress in wind power generation (WPG) from 2005 to 2020 using CiteSpace based scientometric analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126496. DOI
[2]	DU L J, SHI Y, LI F L, 2013. Based on Remote Sensing and GIS Technology Jinzhai Human-Nature Interrelationship Change and Driving Force Analysis[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University: 9047-9055.
[3]	GUO M, LI X, XIAO D N, et al., 2005. Ecological security pattern analysis of Jiuquan oasis using remote sensing and GIS[M]. New York: IEEE, 1867-1870.
[4]	JIN X X, WEI L Y, WANG Y, et al., 2020. Construction of ecological security pattern based on the importance of ecosystem service functions and ecological sensitivity assessment: A case study in Fengxian County of Jiangsu Province, China[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(1): 563-590. DOI URL
[5]	KANG J M, ZHANG X, ZHU X W, et al., 2021. Ecological security pattern: A new idea for balancing regional development and ecological protection. A case study of the Jiaodong Peninsula, China[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01472. DOI
[6]	KNAAPEN J P, SCHEFFER M, HARMS B, 1992. Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 23(1): 1-16. DOI URL
[7]	LI J L, XU J G, CHU J L, 2019. The Construction of a Regional Ecological Security Pattern Based on Circuit Theory[J]. Sustainability, 11(22): 1-17. DOI URL
[8]	LI S C, XIAO W, ZHAO Y L, et al., 2020. Incorporating ecological risk index in the multi-process MCRE model to optimize the ecological security pattern in a semi-arid area with intensive coal mining: A case study in northern China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, DOI: 0.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119143. DOI
[9]	LIU Y, FENG Y J, 2016. Simulating the Impact of Economic and Environmental Strategies on Future Urban Growth Scenarios in Ningbo, China[J]. Sustainability, DOI: 10.3390/su8101045. DOI
[10]	LYU R F, ZHANG J M, XU M Q, 2018. Integrating ecosystem services evaluation and landscape pattern analysis into urban planning based on scenario prediction and regression model[J]. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 16(3): 252-266. DOI URL
[11]	NATHWANI J, LU X L, WU C Y, et al., 2019. Quantifying security and resilience of Chinese coastal urban ecosystems[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 672: 51-60. DOI URL
[12]	PENG J, PAN Y J, LIU Y X, et al., 2018a. Linking ecological degradation risk to identify ecological security patterns in a rapidly urbanizing landscape[J]. Habitat International, 71: 110-124. DOI URL
[13]	PENG J, YANG Y, LIU Y X, et al., 2018b. Linking ecosystem services and circuit theory to identify ecological security patterns[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 644: 781-790. DOI URL
[14]	PENG J, ZHAO M Y, GUO X N, et al., 2017. Spatial-temporal dynamics and associated driving forces of urban ecological land: A case study in Shenzhen City, China[J]. Habitat International, 60: 81-90. DOI URL
[15]	SU Y, WANG Z N, 2018. 3D Reconstruction of Submarine Landscape Ecological Security Pattern Based on Virtual Reality[J]. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, DOI: 10.2112/SI83-101.1. DOI
[16]	TONG H L, SHI P J, 2020. Using ecosystem service supply and ecosystem sensitivity to identify landscape ecology security patterns in the Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration, China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 17(11): 2758-2773. DOI URL
[17]	VOGT P, RIITTERS K H, IWANOWSKI M, et al., 2006. Mapping landscape corridors[J]. Ecological Indicators, 7(2): 481-488. DOI URL
[18]	WANG T, LI H B, HUANG Y, 2021. The complex ecological network’s resilience of the Wuhan metropolitan area[J]. Ecological Indicators, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108101. DOI
[19]	YU K J, 1996. Security patterns and surface model in landscape ecological planning[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 36(1): 1-17. DOI URL
[20]	ZHANG L Q, PENG J, LIU Y X, et al., 2017. Coupling ecosystem services supply and human ecological demand to identify landscape ecological security pattern: A case study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 20(3): 701-714. DOI URL
[21]	ZHANG R T, LU J F, 2021. Simulation of Land Use Pattern Evolution from a Multi-Scenario Perspective: A Case Study of Suzhou City in Anhui Province, China[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(3): 921. DOI URL
[22]	ZHANG Y J, YU B Y, ASHRAF M A, 2015. Ecological security pattern for the landscape of mesoscale and microscale land: A case study of the Harbin City center[J]. Taylor & Francis, 23(3): 192-201.
[23]	ZHAO X Q, YUE Q F, PEI J C, et al., 2021. Ecological security pattern construction in karst area based on ant algorithm[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18136863. DOI
[24]	陈利顶, 孙然好, 孙涛, 等, 2021. 城市群生态安全格局构建: 概念辨析与理论思考[J]. 生态学报, 41(11): 4251-4258.
	CHEN L D, SUN R H, SUN T, et al., 2021. Eco-security pattern building in urban agglomeration: conceptual and theoretical thinking[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(11): 4251-4258.
[25]	陈清清, 2021. 基于生态安全格局的国土空间生态修复策略研究[D]. 浙江: 浙江大学: 10-11.
	CHEN Q Q, 2021. Research on territorial space ecological restoration strategies based on ecological security patterns: A case study of Binzhou city[D]. Zhejiang: Zhejiang university: 10-11.
[26]	陈昕, 彭建, 刘焱序, 等, 2017. 基于“重要性—敏感性—连通性”框架的云浮市生态安全格局构建[J]. 地理研究, 36(3): 471-484. DOI
	CHEN X, PENG J, LIU Y X, et al., 2017. Constructing ecological security patterns in Yunfu City based on the framework of importance-sensitivity-connectivity[J]. Geographical Research, 36(03): 471-484.
[27]	陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等, 2015. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 33(2): 242-253.
	CHEN Y, CHEN C M, LIU Z Y, et al., 2015. The methodology function of Cite Space mapping knowledge domains[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 33(2): 242-253.
[28]	杜悦悦, 胡熠娜, 杨旸, 等, 2017. 基于生态重要性和敏感性的西南山地生态安全格局构建——以云南省大理白族自治州为例[J]. 生态学报, 37(24): 8241-8253.
	DU Y Y, HU Y N, YANG Y, et al., 2017. building ecological security patterns in southwestern mountains areas based on ecological importance and ecological sensitivity: A case study of Dali Bai Autonomous Preference, Yunnan Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(24): 8241-8253.
[29]	樊杰, 2016. 我国国土空间开发保护格局优化配置理论创新与“十三五”规划的应对策略[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 31(1): 1-12.
	FAN J, 2016. Theoretical innovation in optimization of protection and development of China’s territorial space and coping strategy of 13th five-year plan[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 31(1): 1-12.
[30]	方莹, 王静, 黄隆杨, 等, 2020. 基于生态安全格局的国土空间生态保护修复关键区域诊断与识别——以烟台市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 35(1): 190-203.
	FANG Y, WANG J, HUANG L Y, et al., 2020. Determining and identifying key areas of ecosystem preservation and restoration for territorial spatial planning based on ecological security patterns: A case study of Yantai City[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 35(1): 190-203. DOI URL
[31]	关文彬, 谢春华, 马克明, 等, 2003. 景观生态恢复与重建是区域生态安全格局构建的关键途径[J]. 生态学报, 23(1): 64-73.
	GUAN W B, XIE C H, MA K M, et al., 2003. A vital method for constructing regional ecological security pattern: Landscape ecological restoration and rehabilitation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 23(1): 64-73.
[32]	何玲, 贾启建, 李超, 等, 2016. 基于生态系统服务价值和生态安全格局的土地利用格局模拟[J]. 农业工程学报, 32(3): 275-284.
	HE L, JIA Q J, LI C, et al., 2016. Land use pattern simulation based on ecosystem service value and ecological security pattern[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 32(3): 275-284.
[33]	蒋艳灵, 刘春腊, 周长青, 等, 2015. 中国生态城市理论研究现状与实践问题思考[J]. 地理研究, 34(12): 2222-2237. DOI
	JIANG Y L, LIU C L, ZHOU C Q, et al., 2015. Overview of theoretical research and practical considerations on eco-cities of China[J]. Geographical Research, 34(12): 2222-2237.
[34]	黎晓亚, 马克明, 傅伯杰, 等, 2004. 区域生态安全格局:设计原则与方法[J]. 生态学报, 24(5): 1055-1062.
	LI X Y, MA K M, FU B J, et al., 2004. The regional pattern for ecological security (RPES): Designing principles and method[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24(5): 1055-1062.
[35]	李晖, 易娜, 姚文璟, 等, 2011. 基于景观安全格局的香格里拉县生态用地规划[J]. 生态学报, 31(20): 5928-5936.
	LI H, YI N, YAO W J, et al., 2011. Shangri-La County ecological land use planning based on landscape security pattern[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(20): 5928-5936.
[36]	李静, 张莹莹, 朱永明, 2017. 基于景观安全格局的北戴河新区生物多样性保护研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 24(1): 305-310, 316.
	LI J, ZHANG Y Y, ZHU Y M, 2017. Research on biodiversity conservation of Beidaihe new district based on landscape security pattern[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 24(1): 305-310, 316.
[37]	李绥, 石铁矛, 付士磊, 等, 2011. 南充城市扩展中的景观生态安全格局[J]. 应用生态学报, 22(3): 734-740.
	LI S, SHI T M, FU S L, et al., 2011. Landscape ecological security pattern during urban expansion of Nanchong city[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 22(3): 734-740.
[38]	刘洋, 蒙吉军, 朱利凯, 2010. 区域生态安全格局研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 30(24): 6980-6989.
	LIU Y, MENG J J, ZHU L K, 2010. Progress in the research on regional ecological security pattern[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30(24): 6980-6989.
[39]	吕大伟, 蔡海生, 张学玲, 等, 2021. 基于遥感生态指数的弋阳县生态安全格局构建及优化[J]. 农业现代化研究, 42(3): 545-556.
	LÜ D W, CAI H S, ZHANG X L, et al., 2021. Construction and optimization of the ecological security pattern in Yiyang County based on the remote sensing ecological index[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 42(3): 545-556.
[40]	马克明, 傅伯杰, 黎晓亚, 等, 2004. 区域生态安全格局: 概念与理论基础[J]. 生态学报, 24(4): 761-768.
	MA K M, FU B J, LI X Y, et al., 2004. The regional pattern for ecological security (RPES): The concept and theoretical basis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24(4): 761-768.
[41]	欧定华, 夏建国, 张莉, 等, 2015. 区域生态安全格局规划研究进展及规划技术流程探讨[J]. 生态环境学报, 24(1): 163-173.
	OU D H, XIA J G, ZHANG L, et al., 2015. Research progress on regional ecological security pattern planning and discussion of planning techniqueflow[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 24(1): 163-173.
[42]	潘竟虎, 李磊, 2021. 利用OWA和电路模型优化黄河流域甘肃段生态安全格局[J]. 农业工程学报, 37(3): 259-268.
	PAN J H, LI L, 2021. Optimization of ecological security pattern in Gansu section of the Yellow River Basin using OWA and circuit model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 37(3): 259-268.
[43]	彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等, 2017. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望[J]. 地理研究, 36(3): 407-419. DOI
	PENG J, ZHAO H J, LIU Y X, et al., 2017. Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction[J]. Geographical Research, 36(3): 407-419.
[44]	邱硕, 王宇欣, 王平智, 等, 2018. 基于MCR模型的城镇生态安全格局构建和建设用地开发模式[J]. 农业工程学报, 34(17): 257-265, 302.
	QUE S, WANG Y X, WANG P Z, et al., 2018. Construction of urban ecological security pattern and construction land development based on MCR model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 34(17): 257-265, 302.
[45]	施生旭, 童佩珊, 2018. 基于CiteSpace的城市群生态安全研究发展态势分析[J]. 生态学报, 38(22): 8234-8246.
	SHI S X, TONG P S, 2018. Analysis of ecological security of the urban agglomeration development trend based on CiteSpace econometric analysis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(22): 8234-8246.
[46]	苏冲, 董建权, 马志刚, 等, 2019. 基于生态安全格局的山水林田湖草生态保护修复优先区识别——以四川省华蓥山区为例[J]. 生态学报, 39(23): 8948-8956.
	SU C, DONG J Q, MA Z G, et al., 2019. Identifying priority areas for ecological protection and restoration of mountains-rivers-forests-farmlands-grasslands based on ecological security patterns: a case study in Huaying Mountain, Sichuan Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(23): 8948-8956.
[47]	王云, 潘竟虎, 2019. 基于生态系统服务价值重构的干旱内陆河流域生态安全格局优化——以张掖市甘州区为例[J]. 生态学报, 39(10): 3455-3467.
	WANG Y, PANG J H, 2019. Establishment of ecological security patterns based on ecosystem services value reconstruction in an arid inland basin: A case study of the Ganzhou District, Zhangye City, Gansu Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(10): 3455-3467.
[48]	吴健生, 张理卿, 彭建, 等, 2013. 深圳市景观生态安全格局源地综合识别[J]. 生态学报, 33(13): 4125-4133.
	WU J S, ZHANG L Q, PENG J, et al., 2013. The integrated recognition of the source area of the urban ecological security pattern in Shenzhen[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(13): 4125-4133. DOI URL
[49]	吴茂全, 胡蒙蒙, 汪涛, 等, 2019. 基于生态安全格局与多尺度景观连通性的城市生态源地识别[J]. 生态学报, 39(13): 4720-4731.
	WU M Q, HU M M, WANG T, et al., 2019. Recognition of urban ecological source area based on ecological security pattern and multi-scale landscape connectivity[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(13): 4720-4731.
[50]	熊文, 邱凉, 2006. 城乡一体化景观生态安全格局研究初探——广州市城乡一体生态安全格局分析[J]. 水利渔业, 26(2): 63-66.
	XIONG W, QIU L, 2006. Preliminary study on the Pattern of Urban and Rural Integrated Landscape ecological security: Analysis on the pattern of Urban and rural integrated ecological security in Guangzhou city[J]. ournal of Hydroecology, 26(2): 63-66.
[51]	闫玉玉, 曹宇, 谭永忠, 2016. 基于景观安全格局的县域生态用地保护研究——以浙江省青田县为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 30(11): 78-85, 97.
	YAN Y Y, CAO Y, TAN Y Z, 2016. Research on ecological land protection at county scale by landscape security patterns method: Taking Qingtian County as an example[J]. China Land Science, 30(11): 78-85, 97.
[52]	严陶韬, 薛建辉, 2021. 中国生物多样性研究文献计量分析[J]. 生态学报, 41(19): 7879-7892.
	YAN T T, XUE J H, 2021. Bibliometric analysis of biodiversity research literature in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(19): 7879-7892.
[53]	杨凯, 曹银贵, 冯喆, 等, 2021. 基于最小累积阻力模型的生态安全格局构建研究进展[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 37(5): 555-565.
	YANG K, CAO Y G, FENG Z, et al., 2021. Research progress of ecological security pattern construction based on minimum cumulative resistance model[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 37(5): 555-565.
[54]	杨永福, 洪咸友, 朱桂龙, 1999. 科学发展中的学科交叉研究史例探析[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 15(4): 60-64.
	YANG Y F, HONG X Y, ZHU G L, 1999. A case study of interdisciplinary research in the development of science[J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 15(4): 60-64.
[55]	杨志, 2021. 基于CiteSpace的国内多元环境治理研究热点与趋势[J]. 人民长江, 52(S1): 24-30, 37.
	YANG Z, 2021. Research topics and trends in domestic multi-environmental governance based on CiteSpace[J]. Yangtze River, 52(S1): 24-30, 37.
[56]	俞孔坚, 1999. 生物保护的景观生态安全格局[J]. 生态学报, 19(1): 10-17.
	YU K J, 1999. Landscape ecological security patterns in biological conservation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 19(1): 10-17.
[57]	俞孔坚, 2016. 生态安全格局与国土空间开发格局优化[J]. 景观设计学, 4(5): 6-9.
	YU K J, 2016. Ecological security pattern and spatial development pattern optimization of national territory[J]. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 4(5): 6-9.
[58]	俞孔坚, 乔青, 李迪华, 等, 2009b. 基于景观安全格局分析的生态用地研究——以北京市东三乡为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 20(8): 1932-1939.
	YU K J, QIAO Q, LI D H, et al., 2009b. Ecological land use in three towns of eastern Beijing: A case study based on landscape security pattern analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 20(8): 1932-1939.
[59]	俞孔坚, 王思思, 李迪华, 等, 2009a. 北京市生态安全格局及城市增长预景[J]. 生态学报, 29(3): 1189-1204.
	YU K J, WANG S S, LI D H, et al., 2009a. The function of ecological security patterns as an urban growth framework in Beijing[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(3): 1189-1204.
[60]	俞孔坚, 王思思, 李迪华, 等, 2010. 北京城市扩张的生态底线——基本生态系统服务及其安全格局[J]. 城市规划, 34(2): 19-24.
	YU K J, WANG S S, LI D H, et al., 2010. Ecological baseline for Beijing’s urban sprawl: Basic ecosystem services and their security patterns[J]. City Planning Review, 34(2): 19-24.
[61]	张晨笛, 刘杰, 张浪, 等, 2021. 基于城市生态廊道概念应用的三个衍生概念生成与辨析[J]. 中国园林, 37(11): 109-114.
	ZHANG C D, LIU J, ZHANG L, et al., 2021. Generation and analysis of three derived concepts based on the application of urban ecological corridor conceptt[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 37(11): 109-114.
[62]	张豆, 渠丽萍, 张桀滈, 2019. 基于生态供需视角的生态安全格局构建与优化——以长三角地区为例[J]. 生态学报, 39(20): 7525-7537.
	ZHANG D, QU L P, ZHANG J H, 2019. Ecological security pattern construction method based on the perspective of ecological supply and demand: a case study of Yangtze River Delta[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(20): 7525-7537.
[63]	自然资源部办公厅, 2020. 市级国土空间总体规划编制指南(试行)[EB/OL]. [2020-09-22]. http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202009/t20200924_2561550.html.
	General Office of The Ministry of Natural Resources, 2020. Guidelines for the compilation of Municipal Territorial Space Master Plan (Trial)[EB/OL]. [2020-09-22]. http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202009/t20200924_2561550.html.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

355

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	14	0	0	341

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	290	65
比例	82%	18%

摘要

323

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	323

	来源	本网站

	次数	323
	比例	100%

学科 Subject	频次 Frequency	中心度 Centrality	百分比 Percent/%
Environmental Sciences & Ecology	61	0.31	21.48
Environmental Sciences	47	0.58	16.55
Environmental Studies	18	0.16	6.34
Science & Technology-other Topics	16	0.11	5.63
Green & Sustainable Science & Technology	14	0	4.93
Ecology	12	0.2	4.23
Geosciences, Multidisciplinary	8	0.01	2.82
Physical Geography	8	0.14	2.82
Geography, Physical	8	0.14	2.82
Geology	8	0.01	2.82
Engineering	8	0.11	2.82
Biodiversity Conservation	7	0	2.46
Biodiversity & Conservation	7	0	2.46
Water Resources	6	0.09	2.11
Urban Studies	6	0.08	2.11

学科 Subject	频次 Frequency	中心度 Centrality	百分比 Percent/%
Environmental Sciences & Ecology	61	0.31	21.48
Environmental Sciences	47	0.58	16.55
Environmental Studies	18	0.16	6.34
Science & Technology-other Topics	16	0.11	5.63
Green & Sustainable Science & Technology	14	0	4.93
Ecology	12	0.2	4.23
Geosciences, Multidisciplinary	8	0.01	2.82
Physical Geography	8	0.14	2.82
Geography, Physical	8	0.14	2.82
Geology	8	0.01	2.82
Engineering	8	0.11	2.82
Biodiversity Conservation	7	0	2.46
Biodiversity & Conservation	7	0	2.46
Water Resources	6	0.09	2.11
Urban Studies	6	0.08	2.11

基于CiteSpace的生态安全格局研究进展

Advances in Research of Ecological Security Patterns, Based on CiteSpace

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 63

相关文章 8

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

本文评价

序号 Code	期刊 Journal	频次 Frequency
1	Landscape Urban Plan	57
2	Ecol Indic	47
3	Sci Total Environ	46
4	生态学报	45
5	Landscape Ecol	43
6	Ecol Model	39
7	Land Use Policy	37
8	Habitat Int	36
9	Sustainability	34
10	J Environ Manage	32
11	Urban for Urban Gree	31
12	Science	30
13	Urban Ecosyst	30
14	应用生态学报	30
15	Nature	28
16	Acta Ecol Sin	26
17	J Clean Prod	25
18	Ecol Econ	21
19	地理研究	21
20	地理学报	20

	频次 Frequency	作者 Author	年份 Year	期刊 Journal	文献 Literature
CNKI	1556	俞孔坚	1999	生态学报	生物保护的景观生态安全格局
	669	马克明	2004	生态学报	区域生态安全格局: 概念与理论基础
	532	俞孔坚	2009	生态学报	北京市生态安全格局及城市增长预景
	359	关文彬	2003	生态学报	景观生态恢复与重建是区域生态安全格局构建的关键途径
	322	俞孔坚	2009	应用生态学报	基于景观安全格局分析的生态用地研究——以北京市东三乡为例
WOS	99	Yu	1996	Landscape and Urban Planning	Security patterns and surface model in landscape ecological planning
	80	Peng et al.	2018	Habitat International	Linking ecological degradation risk to identify ecological security patterns in a rapidly urbanizing landscape
	78	Peng et al.	2018	Science of the Total Environment	Linking ecosystem services and circuit theory to identify ecological security patterns
	62	Peng et al.	2017	Habitat International	Spatial-temporal dynamics and associated driving forces of urban ecological land: A case study in Shenzhen City, China
	61	Zhang et al.	2017	Urban ECosystems	Coupling ecosystem services supply and human ecological demand to identify landscape ecological security pattern: A case study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China

来源 Source	年份 Year	关键词 Keyword	频次 Frequency	中心度 Centrality
CNKI	1996	生态安全格局	315	0.81
	1996	最小累积阻力模型	185	0.49
	2005	生态安全	44	0.56
	1996	生态源地	39	0.13
	1996	生态系统服务	34	0.1
	2011	生态廊道	34	0.2
	1996	优化	30	0.01
	1996	哈尔滨市	27	0.00
	1996	mspa	27	0.00
	1996	多情景	26	0.00
WOS	2012	ecological security pattern	31	0.2
	2016	ecosystem service	24	0.05
	2016	area	20	0.18
	2015	model	19	0.19
	2016	conservation	16	0.07
	2017	connectivity	14	0.17
	2007	ecological security	12	0.26
	2017	impact	12	0.06
	2017	urbanization	12	0.08
	2016	land use	11	0.09

[1]	许静, 廖星凯, 甘崎旭, 周茅先. 基于MSPA与电路理论的黄河流域甘肃段生态安全格局构建[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(4): 805-813.
[2]	张平江, 党国锋. 基于MCR模型与蚁群算法的洮河流域生态安全格局构建[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(3): 481-491.
[3]	姚付龙, 黄健, 闫俊杰, 刘海军, 唐国乾. 西天山北坡草甸群落表土花粉组合及其生态指示意义[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(7): 1350-1359.
[4]	韦家怡, 李铖, 吴志峰, 张莉, 吉冬青, 程炯. 粤港澳大湾区生态安全格局及重要生态廊道识别[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 652-662.
[5]	易浪, 孙颖, 尹少华, 魏晓. 生态安全格局构建：概念、框架与展望[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 845-856.
[6]	相恒星, 张健, 王宗明, 毛德华. 松嫩平原生态系统服务供需研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(8): 1769-1776.
[7]	袁洁, 赵晏强. 基于Web of Science数据库的湿地修复研究发展态势分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(7): 1541-1548.
[8]	王薇, 张蕾. 基于CiteSpace的城市环境中细颗粒物研究进展的可视化分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(6): 1321-1332.