基于HEC-RAS模型的伊洛河流域主要支流水体污染物迁移模拟及应用

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.01.011

生态环境学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 124-133.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.01.011

• 研究论文【环境科学】 • 上一篇下一篇

基于HEC-RAS模型的伊洛河流域主要支流水体污染物迁移模拟及应用

王頔¹(), 李阳¹, 石峰¹, 郝松泽²^,³, 卢超¹^,^*()

1.安阳工学院电气与无人机学院，河南安阳 455000
2.河南省生态环境技术中心，河南郑州 450000
3.郑州市生态环境健康风险防控重点实验室，河南郑州 450000

收稿日期:2025-04-27 修回日期:2025-10-01 接受日期:2025-10-30 出版日期:2026-01-18 发布日期:2026-01-05
通讯作者: * E-mail: researcherluchao@126.com
作者简介:王頔（1988年生），女，讲师，硕士研究生，研究方向为模型预测与智能控制。E-mail: yidi11@163.com
基金资助:
安阳市科技攻关项目(2025C01SF108);河南省科技攻关项目(242102321119);河南省科技攻关项目(232102210049);河南省科技攻关项目(242102240114);河南省驻点城市生态环境保护治理攻坚“一市一策”综合解决方案(2022-YRUC-01-050208)

Simulation and Application of Pollutant Transport in Water Bodies of Major Tributaries of Yiluo River Basin Based on HEC-RAS Model

WANG Di¹(), LI Yang¹, SHI Feng¹, HAO Songze²^,³, LU Chao¹^,^*()

1. Anyang Institute of Technology, AnYang 455000, P. R. China
2. Ecological Environment Technology Center of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450000, P. R. China
3. Zhengzhou Key Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Health Risk Prevention and Control, Zhengzhou 450000, P. R. China

Received:2025-04-27 Revised:2025-10-01 Accepted:2025-10-30 Online:2026-01-18 Published:2026-01-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

伴随人类活动的加剧，大量污染物进入水环境，对生态环境造成了巨大的威胁。针对伊洛河流域支流德亭河与北沟河频发的突发性水污染问题，基于河道水力分析模型（HEC-RAS）构建一维水动力-水质耦合模型，模拟特征污染物的扩散迁移规律，并提出应急策略。通过实测水文数据与地形数据构建河道断面，设置曼宁糙率系数和收缩/扩张系数，并利用示踪试验率定纵向离散系数进行模型验证，结果显示水位和流速模拟平均相对误差分别低于2.38%和8.29%，水质模拟结果与实测值高度吻合。通过情景模拟分析可知德亭河六价铬（Cr⁶⁺）在丰水期泄漏6×10³ m³泥浆，5 h后形成7.6 km污染带，670 min后污染物汇入伊河干流，最大质量浓度达3.35 mg∙L⁻¹（超标1380 min），建议通过生态流量调控或投加沉淀剂应急；北沟河在5 t柴油泄漏后形成3 km污染带并持续扩散，950 min后影响伊河干流，最大质量浓度达6.53 mg∙L⁻¹（超标850 min），推荐采取围堵吸附和化学降解措施。研究表明HEC-RAS模型能有效预测污染物的时空分布特征，结合地形、流量与污染物特性的差异，提出了分级应急策略。该研究可为中小河流突发污染事故的快速响应以及降低其生态与公共安全风险提供科学依据。

关键词: 伊洛河支流, HEC-RAS, 污染物迁移, 突发水污染事故, 应急管理

Abstract:

With the intensification of human activities, massive amounts of pollutants have entered aquatic environments, posing a significant threat to ecosystems. To address the frequent sudden water pollution incidents in the Deting and Beigou River tributaries of the Yiluo River Basin, a one-dimensional hydrodynamic-water quality coupled model was constructed based on the Hydraulic Engineering Calculation and Analysis System (HEC-RAS). This model simulates the dispersion and migration patterns of characteristic pollutants and proposes emergency response strategies. River cross-sections were constructed using measured hydrological and topographic data, incorporating Manning’s roughness coefficient and contraction/expansion coefficients. The model validation was validated using tracer tests to calibrate the longitudinal dispersion coefficients. The results demonstrated average relative errors below 2.38% for the water level simulation and 8.29% for the flow velocity simulation, with water quality simulations showing a high correlation with measured values. Scenario simulations indicated that a 6×10³ m³ slurry leak of hexavalent chromium (Cr⁶⁺) in the Deting River during the flood season would form a 7.6 km pollution plume within five hours. After 670 min, pollutants entered the main stem of the Yi River, reaching a maximum mass concentration of 3.35 mg·L⁻¹ (exceeding the standards for 1380 min). Emergency measures, such as ecological flow regulation and precipitation agent addition, are recommended to address this issue. Following a 5-ton diesel spill in the Beigou River, a 3-km pollution zone formed and continued to spread, affecting the Yihe River mainstem after 950 min with a maximum mass concentration of 6.53 mg L⁻¹ (exceeding standards for 850 min). Containment, adsorption, and chemical degradation are thus recommended. This study demonstrated that the HEC-RAS model effectively predicted the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of pollutants. A tiered emergency response strategy was proposed based on variations in topography, flow rate, and pollutant properties of the river. This study provides a scientific basis for rapid responses to sudden pollution incidents in small- and medium-sized rivers and for mitigating associated ecological and public safety risks.

Key words: tributaries of the Yiluo River, HEC-RAS, Pollutant migration, sudden water pollution accidents, emergency management

中图分类号:

王頔, 李阳, 石峰, 郝松泽, 卢超. 基于HEC-RAS模型的伊洛河流域主要支流水体污染物迁移模拟及应用[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(1): 124-133.

WANG Di, LI Yang, SHI Feng, HAO Songze, LU Chao. Simulation and Application of Pollutant Transport in Water Bodies of Major Tributaries of Yiluo River Basin Based on HEC-RAS Model[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(1): 124-133.

图/表 11

图1 研究区域分布图

Figure 1 Distribution map of the studied area

图2 德亭河和北沟河特征河段断面概化示意图

Figure 2 Schematic diagram of section generalization of Deting River and Beigou River

表1 模型边界条件类型

Table 1 Types of model boundary conditions

编号	河道名称	河段名称	断面编号	边界条件类型
1	德亭河	上游	922	水位条件
2	德亭河	中游1	15176	控制水位
3	德亭河	中游2	13343	控制水位
4	德亭河	中游3	10097	控制水位
5	德亭河	中游4	3868	控制水位
6	德亭河	下游	3020	控制水位
7	德亭河	下游	19	水位条件
8	德亭河-支流1	支流	148	控制水位
9	德亭河-支流2	支流	631	控制水位
10	德亭河-支流3	支流	469	控制水位
11	德亭河-支流4	支流	637	控制水位
12	德亭河-支流5	支流	392	控制水位
13	北沟河	上游	6020	水位条件
14	北沟河	中游	11444	控制水位
15	北沟河	中游2	10119	控制水位
16	北沟河	下游	5619	控制水位
17	北沟河	下游	36	水位条件
18	北沟河-支流1	支流	167	控制水位
19	北沟河-支流2	支流	175	控制水位
20	北沟河-支流3	支流	488	控制水位

图3 不同时期德亭河和北沟河水位线趋势图

Figure 3 Trends in water level lines of the Detting and Beigou Rivers at different time periods

图4 丰水期德亭河和北沟河流速模拟值与实测值对比图

Figure 4 Comparison of simulated and measured flow velocities in the Deting and Beigou Rivers during the abundant water period

表2 断面模拟值与实测值的相对误差

Table 2 Relative error between simulated and measured values of section

河流名称	实测值范围		模拟值范围		平均相对误差值/%
河流名称	水位/m	流速/(m∙s⁻¹)	水位/m	流速/(m∙s⁻¹)	水位	流速
德亭河	（428.40，677.08）	（0.30，1.17）	（438.58，661.01）	（0.18，1.59）	2.38	4.65
北沟河	（777.40，1077.05）	（0.45，1.07）	（799.08，1093.95）	（0.46，1.25）	2.13	8.29

图5 德亭河和北沟河丰水期氯化钠质量浓度模拟前后对比图

Figure 5 Comparison between before and after simulation of mass concentration of sodium chloride in the Deiting and Beigou Rivers during the abundant water period

图6 德亭河最下游断面Cr6+污染带长度和峰值移动距离变化过程

Figure 6 The process of change in the length of the contaminated zone and peak travel distance in the lowermost section of Deting River

图7 德亭河最下游断面Cr6+质量浓度变化过程

Figure 7 The process of pollutant concentration change in the lowermost section of Deting River

图8 北沟河最下游断面柴油污染带长度和峰值移动距离变化过程

Figure 8 The process of change in the length of the contaminated zone and peak travel distance in the lowermost section of Beigou River

图9 北沟河最下游断面柴油质量浓度变化过程

Figure 9 The process of pollutant concentration change in the lowermost section of Deting River

参考文献 36

[1]	DRAKE J, BRADFORD A, JOY D, 2010. Application of HEC-RAS 4.0 temperature model to estimate groundwater contributions to Swan Creek, Ontario, Canada[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 389(3-4): 390-398. DOI URL
[2]	FAN C, KO C H, WANG W S, 2009. An innovative modeling approach using Qual2K and HEC-RAS integration to assess the impact of tidal effect on River Water quality simulation[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5): 1824-1832. DOI PMID
[3]	FAUST J B, 2009. Perspectives on cumulative risks and impacts[J]. International Journal of Toxicology, 29(1): 58-64. DOI URL
[4]	HOU D B, GE X F, HUANG P J, et al., 2014. A real-time, dynamic early-warning model based on uncertainty analysis and risk assessment for sudden water pollution accidents[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(14): 8878-8892. DOI URL
[5]	LI D Y, DONG Z C, SHI L Y, et al., 2019. Risk probability assessment of sudden water pollution in the plain river network based on random discharge from multiple risk sources[J]. Water Resources Management, 33(12): 4051-4065. DOI
[6]	TENG M M, ZHAO X L, ZHOU L F, et al., 2024. An integrated analysis of the fecal metabolome and metagenome reveals the distinct effects of differentially charged nanoplastics on the gut microbiota-associated metabolites in mice[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 906: 167287. DOI URL
[7]	WANG X, PANG Y, WANG X, et al., 2017. Study of water environmental cumulative risk assessment based on control unit and management platform application in plain river network[J]. Sustainability, 9(6): 975. DOI URL
[8]	XIAO Y, HUANG S L, ZHOU J G, et al., 2018. Risk assessment of upper-middle reaches of Luanhe River Basin in sudden water pollution incidents based on control units of water function areas[J]. Water, 10(9): 1268. DOI URL
[9]	陈鼎豪, 郑文丽, 王骥, 等, 2021. 简化一维水质模型在突发水污染事故模拟预测中的应用[J]. 环境工程学报, 15(20): 3199-3203.
	CHEN D H, ZHENG W L, WANG J, et al., 2021. Application of s implified one-dimensional water quality model in simulation and prediction for sudden water pollution accidents[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 15(20): 3199-3203.
[10]	陈相威, 孙大伟, 王京, 等, 2018. 基于HEC-RAS对城市河道枯水期补水方案的应用研究[J]. 价值工程, 37(32): 185-188.
	CHEN X W, SUN D W, WANG J, et al., 2018. Application research of water supply scheme for urban river road in dry season based on HEC-RAS[J]. Value Engineering, 37(32): 185-188.
[11]	陈振宇, 周刚, 白静, 等, 2021. 基于HEC-RAS模型的平原河网区水环境容量研究[J]. 环境保护科学, 47(4): 30-37.
	CHEN Z Y, ZHOU G, BAI J, et al., 2021. Water environment capacity in plain river network area based on HEC-RAS model[J]. Environmental Protection Science, 47(4): 30-37.
[12]	董飞, 刘晓波, 彭文启, 等, 2016. 水功能区水质响应系数计算研究[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 14(1): 10-17.
	DONG F, LIU X B, PENG W Q, et al., 2016. Calculating the water quality response coefficient of water function zone[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 14(1): 10-17.
[13]	董文平, 马涛, 刘强, 等, 2015. 流域水环境风险评估进展及其调控研究[J]. 环境工程, 33(12): 111-115, 194.
	DONG W P, MA T, LIU Q, et al., 2015. Research on risk assessment and control of basin water environment[J]. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 33(12): 111-115, 194.
[14]	国家环境保护总局,国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 2002. 地表水环境质量标准: GB 3838—2002[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社: 5.
	State Environment Protection Administration (SEPA), General Administration for Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of PR China, 2002. Environmental quality standards for surface water: GB 3838—2002[S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press: 5.
[15]	胡婷婷, 徐刚, 苏东旭, 等, 2022. 基于HEC-RAS的梧桐山河流域水质模拟及应用[J]. 水文, 42(3): 37-42.
	HU T T, XU G, SU D X, et al., 2022. Water quality simulation and application of wutongshan river basin based on HEC-RAS[J]. Journal of China Hydrology, 42(3): 37-42.
[16]	荆平飞, 张丹, 吴碧琼, 等, 2024. 三峡大坝下游突发水污染事故水量应急调度模拟研究[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 55(12): 128-147.
	JING P F, ZHANG D, WU B Q, et al., 2024. Emergency dispatch simulation for sudden water pollution accident in downstream reach of the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 55(12): 128-147.
[17]	刘俊, 倪海波, 2013. 投盐法示踪试验的研究与应用[J]. 资源环境与工程, 27(5): 711-713. DOI
	LIU J, NI H B, 2013. Research and application of throwing salt tracer test[J]. Resources Environment & Engineering, 27(5): 711-713.
[18]	李国华, 2018. 黄河托克托段水质现状评价及一维水质模拟[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学.
	LI G H, 2018. Water quality assessment and 1-D water quality model of Tuoketuo section of the Yellow River[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University.
[19]	李莹杰, 王丽婧, 李虹, 等, 2019. 不同水期洞庭湖水体中磷分布特征及影响因素[J]. 环境科学, 40(5): 2170-2177.
	LI Y J, WANG L J, LI H, et al., 2019. Distribution characteristics and influencing factors of phosphorus in the Dongting Lake at different water periods[J]. Environmental Science, 40(5): 2170-2177.
[20]	梁天祎, 2021. 基于SWAT的伊洛河流域水环境承载力研究[D]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学.
	LIANG T Y, 2019. Study on water environment carrying capacity based on SWAT in Yiluo River Basin[D]. Zhengzhou: North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power.
[21]	罗波, 段庭恒, 周敏, 等, 2022. HEC-RAS在江津区流域水环境治理中的应用[J]. 中国给水排水, 38(19): 35-42.
	LUO B, DUAN T H, ZHOU M, et al., 2022. Application of HEC-RAS in water environment management in watershed of Jiangjin District[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 38(19): 35-42.
[22]	马楠, 2015. 通惠河 (通州段) 水环境状况及其生态护岸技术研究与分析[D]. 北京: 北京建筑大学.
	MA N, 2015. Tonghui River (the Section of Tongzhou) water environment and ecological slope protection research and analysis[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture.
[23]	牛茵茵, 2022. 基于HEC-RAS的平原河网水量水质联合调度研究[D]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学.
	NIU Y Y, 2022. Study on joint regulation of water quantity and quality in plain river network based on HEC-RAS[D]. Zhengzhou: North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power.
[24]	任黎, 蔡文美, 朱佳晨, 等, 2024. 基于ENVI+HEC-RAS的苏北运河生态修复方法及改善效果研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 42(8): 197-200, 177.
	REN L, CAI W M, ZHU J C, et al., 2024. Research on ecological restoration method and improvement effect of northern Jiangsu canal based on ENVI+HEC-RAS[J]. Water Resources and Power, 42(8): 197-200, 177.
[25]	汤飞飞, 张侨, 蒙天易, 2024. HEC-RAS在贵州山区中小河流治理工程方案优化中的应用[J]. 陕西水利 (6): 11-14.
	TANG F F, ZHANG Q, MENG T Y, 2024. Application of HEC-RAS in the optimization of small and medium-sized river management projects in mountainous areas of Guizhou province[J]. Shaanxi Water Resources (6): 11-14.
[26]	王莉, 王涵, 郝松泽, 等, 2025. 洛阳市伊洛河流域固定源突发水环境风险评估[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 44(7): 106-113.
	WANG L, WANG H, HAO S Z, et al., 2025. Emergency water environment risk assessment for fixed sources in Yiluo river basin, Luoyang city, China[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 44(7): 106-113.
[27]	徐利, 2019. 北方中小型河流坝区内叶绿素a预测及敏感性分析[D]. 张家口: 河北建筑工程学院.
	XU L, 2019. Water quality assessment and 1-D water quality model of Tuoketuo section of the Yellow River[D]. Zhangjiakou: Hebei Institute of Architecture and Civil Engineering.
[28]	袁鹏, 李文秀, 彭剑峰, 等, 2015. 国内外累积性环境风险评估研究进展[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 5(5): 393-400.
	YUAN P, LI W X, PENG J F, et al., 2015. Research progress of cumulative environmental risk assessment at home and abroad[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 5(5): 393-400.
[29]	张世宝, 李胜东, 冯健, 等, 2020. 基于HEC-RAS的鹿溪河流域水质治理效果研究[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 41(4): 67-73.
	ZHANG S B, LI S D, FENG J, et al., 2020. Study on water quality control effect of Luxi river basin based on HEC-RAS[J]. Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (Natural Science Edition), 41(4): 67-73.
[30]	张文婷, 李祉璇, 张行南, 等, 2022. 基于DEM的河道断面构造改进方法及洪水演进精度评估[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 20(3): 563-572.
	ZHANG W T, LI Z X, ZHANG X N, et al., 2022. DEM-based improved method for river cross-sections modification of flood routing accuracy[J]. South-to North Water Transfer and Water Science & Technology, 20(3): 563-572.
[31]	张小苓, 2022. 突发水污染事故的应急处理措施[J]. 清洗世界, 38(10): 112-114.
	ZHANG X L, 2022. Emergency response measures for sudden water pollution accidents[J]. Cleaning World, 38(10): 112-114.
[32]	赵然杭, 彭弢, 王好芳, 等, 2018. 南水北调东线山东段干渠突发水质污染事故快速预测[J]. 农业工程学报, 34(8): 93-99.
	ZHAO R H, PENG T, WANG H F, et al., 2018. Rapid prediction of sudden water pollution accident in main canal of Shandong section of East Route of South-to-North Water Transfer Project[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 34(8): 93-99.
[33]	郑志杰, 2021. 伊洛河流域地表水环境模拟研究[D]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学.
	ZHENG Z Z, 2021. Study on surface water environment simulation in the Yiluo river basin[D]. Zhengzhou: North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power.
[34]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 2011. 河道整治设计规范: GB 50707—2011 [S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社.
	Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, 2011. Code for design of river regulation works: GB 50707—2011 [S]. Beijing: China Planning Press.
[35]	邹丽芬, 2017. 滨海平原河网水量水质联合调度研究[D]. 福州: 福州大学.
	ZOU L F, 2017. Study on water quantity and quality integrated regulation of coastal plain river network[D]. Fuzhou: Fuzhou University.
[36]	左其亭, 崔国韬, 2020. 人类活动对河湖水系连通的影响评估[J]. 地理学报, 75(7): 1483-1493. DOI
	ZUO Q T, CUI G T, 2020. Quantitative evaluation of human activities affecting an interconnected river system network[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 75(7): 1483-1493. DOI

基于HEC-RAS模型的伊洛河流域主要支流水体污染物迁移模拟及应用

Simulation and Application of Pollutant Transport in Water Bodies of Major Tributaries of Yiluo River Basin Based on HEC-RAS Model

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴璇, 余佳丽, 陈笔, 娄云剀, 何敏, 苗芃, 杨帆, 唐涛. 基于胁迫-响应关系的赤水河氮磷生态承载力研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(1): 134-146.
[2]	熊丽君. 不同降雨特征下水源地下垫面非点源污染排放规律[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(12): 1919-1929.
[3]	赵程潇, 马江鸿, 刘虹霞, 胡静雯, 潘姿彤, 王嘉莹, 李金页. 生物炭对人工湿地的强化脱氮作用[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(12): 1985-1992.
[4]	赵文浩, 高一斐, 陈海燕, 王君浩, 王美英, 陈颖, 马瑾, 吴丰昌. 土壤与地下水多要素协同作用人体健康环境基准理论初探[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(11): 1788-1801.
[5]	赵彧, 方王凯, 张紫薇, 张焕军, 李轶. 太湖水体中非甾体消炎药的赋存特征及其对细菌群落和抗生素抗性基因的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(10): 1495-1506.
[6]	罗诗睫, 温清淇, 陈澄宇. 纳米塑料在海洋和淡水中的赋存、迁移与归趋及其环境风险研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(10): 1532-1546.
[7]	王安侯, 谢志宜, 陈多宏, 王博瑾, 黄莹, 逯颖, 王玉, 杨行健, 李永涛. 广州市典型小流域降雨时期农业面源污染特征分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(10): 1633-1643.
[8]	蒋凯, 柯常栋, 王丽萍, 李朋辉, 赖迪智, 张杨, 吴永洁, 吴仁人, 肖利平. 珠江广州河段粪便污染和溶解有机质的来源解析及分布特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(9): 1452-1462.
[9]	周依湘, 唐斌, 付成忠, 许榕钦, 周东静, 王俊丽, 郑晶. 北江中下游水源地双酚类化合物和溴代阻燃剂的污染特征及风险评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(7): 1007-1019.
[10]	肖咏茵, 王帆, 李灿桦, 汪超, 王万军. 淡水中可生物降解微塑料生物膜上耐药基因的富集特征及其健康风险[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(7): 1029-1041.
[11]	任宸剑, 郝瑞霞, 张杨, 韩丽娟, 魏煜星, 柴璐. 水动力作用下河道底泥氨氮释放特性分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(6): 931-940.
[12]	陈家东, 张鹏, 郭建超, 齐实, 卢旭东, 左琴, 吴慧, 陈益壮. 海南岛生态清洁小流域功能分区与治理措施功能匹配性研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(5): 743-753.
[13]	王弋, 严茂泽, 肖倩, 张思毅, 郝贝贝. 广东省农村生活污水处理现状及建议[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(5): 819-830.
[14]	蒋存征, 陈安强, 胡万里, 付斌, 朱林立, 刘云娥, 黎明琦, 王炽, 张丹. 异龙湖区浅层地下水NO₃⁻-N浓度时空变化及其来源解析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(4): 570-580.
[15]	梁祝, 潘树林, 郭芳成. 向家坝蓄水前后长江上游干流四川段氮磷的时空分布变化[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(4): 581-592.