Ecology and Environmental Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 1483-1494.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.09.014
• Research Article [Environmental Science] • Previous Articles
Zou Zhiqi1(
), Dun Limin2, Wang Jingli1,*(
), Tang Yulan3
Received:2025-06-04
Revised:2026-05-14
Accepted:2026-07-31
Online:2026-09-18
Published:2026-09-16
通讯作者:
王井利, E-mail: 作者简介:邹志琦(2001年生),男(满族),硕士研究生,研究方向为高光谱遥感。E-mail: 2437432433@qq.com
基金资助:CLC Number:
Zou Zhiqi, Dun Limin, Wang Jingli, Tang Yulan. Optimization of UAV Hyperspectral Retrieval of Soil Copper (Cu) Content Using NRBO-XGBoost[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(9): 1483-1494.
邹志琦, 敦力民, 王井利, 唐玉兰. 基于NRBO−XGBoost优化无人机高光谱土壤重金属铜(Cu)含量反演研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(9): 1483-1494.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.09.014
| 光谱指数 | 波段组合/nm | 最佳相关系数 |
|---|---|---|
| NDVI | 466,470 | 0.322 |
| RSI | 894,988 | 0.328 |
| DSI | 466,470 | 0.323 |
| SAVI | 466,470 | −0.322 |
| EVI | 524,458,561 | 0.524 |
| NSI | 385,466,475 | 0.361 |
| SIPI | 549,385,558 | −0.491 |
| TSI | 495,483,466 | −0.451 |
| ABI1 | 458,574,512 | −0.506 |
| ABI2 | 466,483,491 | −0.432 |
| ABI3 | 483,495,458 | −0.496 |
| ABI4 | 466,475,898 | −0.341 |
Table 1 Best band combination and correlation coefficient after SG
| 光谱指数 | 波段组合/nm | 最佳相关系数 |
|---|---|---|
| NDVI | 466,470 | 0.322 |
| RSI | 894,988 | 0.328 |
| DSI | 466,470 | 0.323 |
| SAVI | 466,470 | −0.322 |
| EVI | 524,458,561 | 0.524 |
| NSI | 385,466,475 | 0.361 |
| SIPI | 549,385,558 | −0.491 |
| TSI | 495,483,466 | −0.451 |
| ABI1 | 458,574,512 | −0.506 |
| ABI2 | 466,483,491 | −0.432 |
| ABI3 | 483,495,458 | −0.496 |
| ABI4 | 466,475,898 | −0.341 |
| 光谱指数 | 波段组合/nm | 最佳相关系数 |
|---|---|---|
| NDVI | 642,802 | 0.484 |
| RSI | 454,466 | 0.438 |
| DSI | 537,470 | 0.425 |
| SAVI | 553,470 | 0.484 |
| EVI | 802,397,553 | −0.544 |
| NSI | 446,553,483 | 0.455 |
| SIPI | 993,454,881 | 0.535 |
| TSI | 454,470,553 | −0.544 |
| ABI1 | 553,650,446 | −0.307 |
| ABI2 | 553,470,591 | −0.528 |
| ABI3 | 850,885,520 | −0.570 |
| ABI4 | 780,890,997 | 0.560 |
Table 2 Best band combination and correlation coefficient after FD
| 光谱指数 | 波段组合/nm | 最佳相关系数 |
|---|---|---|
| NDVI | 642,802 | 0.484 |
| RSI | 454,466 | 0.438 |
| DSI | 537,470 | 0.425 |
| SAVI | 553,470 | 0.484 |
| EVI | 802,397,553 | −0.544 |
| NSI | 446,553,483 | 0.455 |
| SIPI | 993,454,881 | 0.535 |
| TSI | 454,470,553 | −0.544 |
| ABI1 | 553,650,446 | −0.307 |
| ABI2 | 553,470,591 | −0.528 |
| ABI3 | 850,885,520 | −0.570 |
| ABI4 | 780,890,997 | 0.560 |
| 光谱指数 | 波段组合/nm | 最佳相关系数 |
|---|---|---|
| NDVI | 625,570 | 0.342 |
| RSI | 723,719 | 0.337 |
| DSI | 625,570 | 0.333 |
| SAVI | 723,710 | 0.354 |
| EVI | 854,642,650 | 0.494 |
| NSI | 625,1020,389 | 0.395 |
| SIPI | 655,574,961 | 0.446 |
| TSI | 702,710,723 | −0.370 |
| ABI1 | 625,659,579 | −0.356 |
| ABI2 | 541,579,625 | −0.367 |
| ABI3 | 566,562,1002 | 0.453 |
| ABI4 | 710,723,591 | 0.376 |
Table 3 Best band combination after CR and correlation coefficient
| 光谱指数 | 波段组合/nm | 最佳相关系数 |
|---|---|---|
| NDVI | 625,570 | 0.342 |
| RSI | 723,719 | 0.337 |
| DSI | 625,570 | 0.333 |
| SAVI | 723,710 | 0.354 |
| EVI | 854,642,650 | 0.494 |
| NSI | 625,1020,389 | 0.395 |
| SIPI | 655,574,961 | 0.446 |
| TSI | 702,710,723 | −0.370 |
| ABI1 | 625,659,579 | −0.356 |
| ABI2 | 541,579,625 | −0.367 |
| ABI3 | 566,562,1002 | 0.453 |
| ABI4 | 710,723,591 | 0.376 |
| 数据集 | 样本数量(n) | 平均值/ (mg·kg−1) | 标准差/ (mg·kg−1) | 变异系数(CV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 训练集 | 50 | 885 | 215 | 0.243 |
| 测试集 | 13 | 868 | 199 | 0.229 |
| 全体样本 | 63 | 881 | 210 | 0.241 |
Table 4 Comparison of statistical characteristics of soil heavy metal Cu content in training and test sets
| 数据集 | 样本数量(n) | 平均值/ (mg·kg−1) | 标准差/ (mg·kg−1) | 变异系数(CV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 训练集 | 50 | 885 | 215 | 0.243 |
| 测试集 | 13 | 868 | 199 | 0.229 |
| 全体样本 | 63 | 881 | 210 | 0.241 |
| 数据源 | 建模方法 | 训练集R2 | 训练集σRMSE | 测试集R2 | 测试集σRMSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG+2D 指数 | XGBoost | 0.600 | 196 | 0.305 | 236 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.642 | 178 | 0.412 | 221 | |
| SG-FD+ 2D指数 | XGBoost | 0.785 | 135 | 0.435 | 211 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.816 | 123 | 0.515 | 201 | |
| SG-CR+ 2D指数 | XGBoost | 0.806 | 240 | 0.443 | 236 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.844 | 222 | 0.352 | 188 | |
| SG+植被 指数 | XGBoost | 0.769 | 138 | 0.618 | 187 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.877 | 104 | 0.633 | 176 | |
| SG-FD+ 植被指数 | XGBoost | 0.833 | 116 | 0.570 | 213 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.933 | 75 | 0.725 | 163 | |
| SG-CR+ 植被指数 | XGBoost | 0.577 | 241 | 0.340 | 281 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.788 | 133 | 0.357 | 256 | |
| SG+新指数 | XGBoost | 0.562 | 154 | 0.433 | 253 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.757 | 147 | 0.454 | 212 | |
| SG-FD+ 新指数 | XGBoost | 0.805 | 121 | 0.404 | 266 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.898 | 95 | 0.655 | 148 | |
| SG-CR+ 新指数 | XGBoost | 0.683 | 179 | 0.423 | 223 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.735 | 157 | 0.650 | 171 |
Table 5 Prediction accuracy of the three datasets with different preprocessing under the two models
| 数据源 | 建模方法 | 训练集R2 | 训练集σRMSE | 测试集R2 | 测试集σRMSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SG+2D 指数 | XGBoost | 0.600 | 196 | 0.305 | 236 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.642 | 178 | 0.412 | 221 | |
| SG-FD+ 2D指数 | XGBoost | 0.785 | 135 | 0.435 | 211 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.816 | 123 | 0.515 | 201 | |
| SG-CR+ 2D指数 | XGBoost | 0.806 | 240 | 0.443 | 236 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.844 | 222 | 0.352 | 188 | |
| SG+植被 指数 | XGBoost | 0.769 | 138 | 0.618 | 187 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.877 | 104 | 0.633 | 176 | |
| SG-FD+ 植被指数 | XGBoost | 0.833 | 116 | 0.570 | 213 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.933 | 75 | 0.725 | 163 | |
| SG-CR+ 植被指数 | XGBoost | 0.577 | 241 | 0.340 | 281 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.788 | 133 | 0.357 | 256 | |
| SG+新指数 | XGBoost | 0.562 | 154 | 0.433 | 253 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.757 | 147 | 0.454 | 212 | |
| SG-FD+ 新指数 | XGBoost | 0.805 | 121 | 0.404 | 266 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.898 | 95 | 0.655 | 148 | |
| SG-CR+ 新指数 | XGBoost | 0.683 | 179 | 0.423 | 223 |
| NRBO-XGBoost | 0.735 | 157 | 0.650 | 171 |
| [1] |
Bao Y L, Ustin S, Meng X T, et al., 2021. A regional-scale hyperspectral prediction model of soil organic carbon considering geomorphic features[J]. Geoderma, 403: 115263.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
Deng B C, Yun Y H, Liang Y Z, 2015. Model population analysis in chemometrics[J]. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 149: 166-176.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
Dong Y, Wang X T, Wang S, et al., 2025. Enhancing soil organic carbon prediction by unraveling the role of crop residue coverage using interpretable machine learning[J]. Geoderma, 455: 117225.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
Fang H, Man W D, Liu M Y, et al., 2023. Leaf area index inversion of spartina alterniflora using UAV hyperspectral data based on multiple optimized machine learning algorithms[J]. Remote Sensing, 15(18): 4465.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
Geng J, Lü J W, Pei J, et al., 2024. Prediction of soil organic carbon in black soil based on a synergistic scheme from hyperspectral data: Combining fractional-order derivatives and three-dimensional spectral indices[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 220: 108905.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
Guo B, Guo X N, Zhang B, et al., 2022. Using a Two-Stage Scheme to Map Toxic Metal Distributions Based on GF-5 Satellite Hyperspectral Images at a Northern Chinese Opencast Coal Mine[J]. Remote Sensing, 14(22): 5804.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
He P, Cheng X F, Wen X P, et al., 2025. Improving soil heavy metal lead inversion through combined band selection methods: A case study in Gejiu city, China[J]. Sensors, 25(3): 684.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
Huang F, Peng S Y, Yang H, et al., 2022. Development of a novel and fast XRF instrument for large area heavy metal detection integrated with UAV[J]. Environmental Research, 214(Part 2): 113841.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
Li Y R, Liu B, Chai X, et al., 2025. Research on shallow water depth remote sensing based on the improvement of the newton-raphson optimizer[J]. Water, 17(4): 552.
DOI URL |
| [10] | Lu B, Sun J, Yang N, et al., 2019. Fluorescence hyperspectral image technique coupled with HSI method to predict solanine content of potatoes[J]. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 43(11): e1419. |
| [11] |
Lu Q K, Si W, Wei L F, et al., 2021. Retrieval of water quality from UAV-Borne hyperspectral imagery: A comparative study of machine learning algorithms[J]. Remote Sensing, 13(19): 3928.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
Ma C Y, Liu X, Li S Q, et al., 2023. Accuracy evaluation of hyperspectral inversion of environmental parameters of loess profile[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 82(10): 251.
DOI |
| [13] | Magreñán Á A, Argyros I K, 2018. A contemporary study of iterative methods: Convergence, dynamics and applications[M]. New York: Academic Press. |
| [14] |
Mahanty B, 2019. Efficient variable selection algorithm adopting variance inflated resampling weight vector into model population analysis[J]. Journal of Chemometrics, 33(2): e3099.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
Premkumar M, Jangir P, Sowmya R, 2021. MOGBO: A new Multiobjective Gradient-Based Optimizer for real-world structural optimization problems[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 218: 106856.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
Sowmya R, Premkumar M, Jangir P, 2024. Newton-Raphson-based optimizer: A new population-based metaheuristic algorithm for continuous optimization problems[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 128: 107532.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
Sun W C, Zhang X, Sun X J, et al., 2018. Predicting nickel concentration in soil using reflectance spectroscopy associated with organic matter and clay minerals[J]. Geoderma, 327: 25-35.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
Tan J, Ding J L, Wang Z Y, et al., 2024. Estimating soil salinity in mulched cotton fields using UAV-based hyperspectral remote sensing and a Seagull Optimization Algorithm-Enhanced Random Forest Model[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 221: 109017.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
Tan K, Ma W B, Chen L H, et al., 2021. Estimating the distribution trend of soil heavy metals in mining area from HyMap airborne hyperspectral imagery based on ensemble learning[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 401: 123288.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
Wei L F, Pu H C, Wang Z X, et al., 2020. Estimation of soil arsenic content with hyperspectral remote sensing[J]. Sensors, 20(14): 4056.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
Zhang F, Li X Y, Zhou X H, et al., 2023. Retrieval of soil salinity based on multi-source remote sensing data and differential transformation technology[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 44(4): 1348-1368.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
Zhang Y, Yang Y Z, Zhang Q W, et al., 2023. Toward multi-stage phenotyping of soybean with multimodal UAV sensor data: A comparison of machine learning approaches for leaf area index estimation[J]. Remote Sensing, 15(1): 7.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
Zhou X H, Zhang F, Liu C J, et al., 2021. Soil salinity inversion based on novel spectral index[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 80(16): 501.
DOI |
| [24] |
Zhu C M, Zhang Z P, Wang H W, et al., 2020. Assessing soil organic matter content in a coal mining area through spectral variables of different numbers of dimensions[J]. Sensors, 20(6): 179.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
Zhu Y H, Liu K, Liu L, et al., 2017. Exploring the Potential of WorldView-2 Red-Edge Band-Based Vegetation Indices for Estimation of Mangrove Leaf Area Index with Machine Learning Algorithms[J]. Remote Sensing, 9(10): 1060.
DOI URL |
| [26] |
Zhuo W, Wu N, Shi R H, et al., 2024. Aboveground biomass retrieval of wetland vegetation at the species level using UAV hyperspectral imagery and machine learning[J]. Ecological Indicators, 166: 112365.
DOI URL |
| [27] | 陈晓凯, 李粉玲, 王玉娜, 等, 2020. 无人机高光谱遥感估算冬小麦叶面积指数[J]. 农业工程学报, 36(22): 40-49. |
| Chen X K, Li F L, Wang Y N, et al., 2020. Estimation of winter wheat leaf area index by UAV hyperspectral remote sensing[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 36(22): 40-49. | |
| [28] | 陈银梦, 詹倩, 2019. 运用双样本t检验的若干误区与正确条件[J]. 统计与管理 (2): 40-42. |
| Chen Y M, Zhan Q, 2019. Several misunderstandings and correct conditions of applying two-sample t-test[J]. Statistics and Management (2): 40-42. | |
| [29] | 程俊恺, 冯秀丽, 陈立波, 等, 2024. 基于无人机高光谱数据的耕地土壤盐分反演模型优选[J]. 应用生态学报, 35(11): 3085-3094. |
| Cheng J K, Feng X L, Chen L B, et al., 2024. Optimization of inversion models for cultivated land soil salinity based on UAV hyperspectral data[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 35(11): 3085-3094. | |
| [30] | 呼斯乐, 包玉龙, 图布新巴雅尔, 等, 2025. 基于无人机高光谱和集成学习的春小麦叶绿素含量反演[J]. 中国农业科技导报(中英文), 27(6): 93-103. |
| Husile, Bao Y L, Tubuxinbayar, et al., 2025. Chlorophyll content inversion of spring wheat based on UAV hyperspectral and ensemble learning[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 27(6): 93-103. | |
| [31] | 刘潜, 王梦迪, 郭龙, 等, 2024. 基于机载高光谱影像的农田尺度土壤有机碳密度制图[J]. 遥感学报, 28(1): 293-305. |
| Liu Q, Wang M D, Guo L, et al., 2024. Mapping of soil organic carbon density at farmland scale based on airborne hyperspectral imagery[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(1): 293-305. | |
| [32] | 生态环境部, 2018. 土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准 (试行): GB 36600—2018[S]. 北京: 中国环境出版社: 3. |
| Ministry of Ecology and Environment, 2018. Soil environmental quality-Risk control standard for soil contamination of development land (Trial): GB 36600—2018[S]. Beijing: China Environment Publishing Group Co., Ltd.: 3. | |
| [33] | 圣超, 苏敦雷, 2025. 土壤重金属污染治理策略研究[J]. 皮革制作与环保科技, 6(5): 123-125. |
| Sheng C, Su D L, 2025. Research on remediation strategies for soil heavy metal pollution[J]. Leather Making and Environmental Technology, 6(5): 123-125. | |
| [34] | 孙小添, 王海超, 韩青池, 等, 2025. 应用无人机遥感数据估算沙柳灌丛地上生物量的方法[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 53(5): 74-81. |
| Sun X T, Wang H C, Han Q C, et al., 2025. Method for estimating aboveground biomass of Salix cheilophila shrub based on UAV remote sensing data[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 53(5): 74-81. | |
| [35] | 涂宇龙, 邹滨, 姜晓璐, 等, 2018. 矿区土壤Cu含量高光谱反演建模[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 38(2): 575-581. |
| Tu Y L, Zou B, Jiang X L, et al., 2018. Hyperspectral inversion modeling of soil Cu content in mining areas[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 38(2): 575-581. | |
| [36] |
王萌, 李杉杉, 李晓越, 等, 2018. 我国土壤中铜的污染现状与修复研究进展[J]. 地学前缘, 25(5): 305-313.
DOI |
| Wang M, Li S S, Li X Y, et al., 2018. Pollution status and remediation research progress of copper in soil in China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 25(5): 305-313. | |
| [37] | 肖学祥, 2025. 小麦病虫害监测及无人机精准防控技术[J]. 新疆农机化 (2): 26-28. |
| Xiao X X, 2025. Monitoring of wheat diseases and insect pests and UAV precise prevention and control technology[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Mechanization (2): 26-28. | |
| [38] | 张雨婷, 齐欣宇, 2025. 土壤重金属污染:环境风险与治理策略[J]. 实验室检测, 3(8): 146-148. |
| Zhang Y T, Qi X Y, 2025. Soil heavy metal pollution: environmental risks and remediation strategies[J]. Laboratory Testing, 3(8): 146-148. | |
| [39] | 张紫玥, 刘晓, 杜丽丽, 等, 2025. 基于随机蛙跳降维和PSO-BPNN的高光谱水体总氮遥感反演[J]. 激光与光电子学进展, 62(17): 97-106. |
| Zhang Z Y, Liu X, Du L L, et al., 2025. Hyperspectral remote sensing inversion of total nitrogen in water based on random frog dimensionality reduction and PSO-BPNN[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 62(17): 97-106. |
| [1] | Wan Xiang, Yan Siqi, Yan Sen, Xie Shuyun, Xiang Wu, Tan Wenfeng. Risk Assessment of Soil Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loss in Danjiangkou Reservoir Area Based on Geochemical Survey [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(9): 1381-1392. |
| [2] | Jiang Tianjie, Yang Hao, Zhang Huan, Wen Wu. Estimating Ground-Level PM2.5 Concentrations Using a Remote Sensing-Based Spatiotemporal Model with Physical Constraints [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(9): 1423-1435. |
| [3] | Xu Yujing, Yang Hao, Yu Hong, Chai Yuying. Analysis on Spatio-temporal Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Coastal Blue Carbon Storage in the Pearl River Delta, China [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(8): 1163-1175. |
| [4] | Liang Miao, Xiang Yun, Lu Qian. Dynamic Coupling and Interactive Response Mechanisms among High-quality Agricultural Development, Industrial Upgrading, and Carbon-Emission Reduction [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(8): 1187-1198. |
| [5] | Zhang Weihong, Gong Yan, Han Zengyu, Liu Zhipeng, Yang Ruozhu, Ma Juan, Lin Naifeng, Tian Feng. Constructing an Ecological Security Pattern Integrating Ecosystem Services and Ecological Management Units: A Case Study of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(8): 1209-1220. |
| [6] | Wang Daoyuan, Zhao Ning, Liu Pingxin, Jiao Guiquan, Huang Yuming, Li Xiaohui. Research on the Trade-off and Coordination Characteristics of Ecosystem Services and Zoning Management in the Taihang Mountains [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(8): 1221-1233. |
| [7] | Wang Liyan, Cao Wei, Luo Yunjian, Zhang Deshun. Research on the Impact of Urban Blue and Green Spaces Landscape Pattern in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration on Ecological Utilization Efficiency [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(8): 1234-1245. |
| [8] | Yao Xubing, Zhang Ling, Che Sifang, Deng Xiaoxia. Study on the Impact of Digital Rural Development on Agricultural Ecological Efficiency [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(7): 1045-1058. |
| [9] | Huang Siqi, Li Tingyuan, Wang Junbin, Chen Jingyang, Shen Jin. The Impact of Sea-Land Breeze on Local Ozone in Coastal Areas of Guangdong [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(7): 1098-1113. |
| [10] | ZHOU Jiahao, ZHANG Pei, PENG Yuwen, ZHONG Songxiong, ZOU Jianping, HOU Dongmei. Machine Learning Supported Determination for the Main Controlling Factors of Heavy Metal Pollution in the Ganjiang River [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(6): 976-985. |
| [11] | SHI Hongfei, HOU Guangliang, CAO Mingzhu, GUAN Jiameng, HE Jiahao, TANG Zhonghua, MA Shuguang. Water Conservation in the Three-River Headwaters Region of the Yellow River: Spatiotemporal Changes and Driving Forces Using the InVEST Model [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(5): 793-804. |
| [12] | LI Yunhong, CHEN Yao, LIU Yulong, ZHANG Hedong, WANG Shuai, LIU Yankun. Plant Diversity and Influencing Factors of Poplar-Birch Secondary Forests to Restoration Models [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(4): 499-508. |
| [13] | QIN Qunce, LI Lianwei, ZHENG Zhi. Spatio-temporal Evolution Analysis of Ecological Vulnerability in Qingdao City Based on the SRP Model [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(4): 540-550. |
| [14] | DU Jiarui, SONG Qian, GAO Wenming. Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Scenario-Based Simulation of Ecosystem Health in the Yellow River Source Region [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(4): 551-562. |
| [15] | HE Dingxue, HAO Shuai, LI Guohua, JIANG Xiaoqing, FENG Zhongli. Stable Isotopes Characteristics and Evaporation Ratio of Main Rivers in Ebinur Lake Basin [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(4): 598-609. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Website Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Add: 808# Tianyuan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou. 510650.
Institute of Eco-environmental and Soil Sciences, Guangdong Academy of Sciences
Tel/Fax: 020-87024961; E-mail: editor@jeesci.com
Support by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd., E-mail: support@magtech.com.cn