Ecology and Environment ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 388-396.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.02.019
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Beier1(), WU Jianqiang2, WANG Min2, XIONG Lijun2, TAN Juan2, SHEN Cheng2, HUANG Botao2, HUANG Shenfa1,2,*(
)
Received:
2022-10-13
Online:
2023-02-18
Published:
2023-05-11
Contact:
HUANG Shenfa
张贝儿1(), 吴建强2, 王敏2, 熊丽君2, 谭娟2, 沈城2, 黄波涛2, 黄沈发1,2,*(
)
通讯作者:
黄沈发
作者简介:
张贝儿(1998年生),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为土壤保育与土壤健康评价。E-mail: zhangbeier8527@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHANG Beier, WU Jianqiang, WANG Min, XIONG Lijun, TAN Juan, SHEN Cheng, HUANG Botao, HUANG Shenfa. Evaluation of Soil Health in Different Arable Land Ecological Conservation Projects[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(2): 388-396.
张贝儿, 吴建强, 王敏, 熊丽君, 谭娟, 沈城, 黄波涛, 黄沈发. 耕地生态保育工程的土壤健康度评价方法初探[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(2): 388-396.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.02.019
评价等级 | 病态 | 不健康 | 亚健康 | 健康 |
---|---|---|---|---|
SHI | 0-0.5 | 0.5-0.7 | 0.7-0.9 | 0.9-1.0 |
Table 1 Classification of soil health assessment levels
评价等级 | 病态 | 不健康 | 亚健康 | 健康 |
---|---|---|---|---|
SHI | 0-0.5 | 0.5-0.7 | 0.7-0.9 | 0.9-1.0 |
重金属元素 | 菌肥工程 | 蚯蚓工程 | 菌肥、蚯蚓工程对照点 | 两无化工程 | 两无化工程对照点 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cd | 0.19±0.060a | 0.18±0.06bc | 0.18±0.04ac | 0.17±0.05c | 0.21±0.05ab |
Hg | 0.08±0.033a | 0.09±0.04b | 0.09±0.06ab | 0.08±0.04ab | 0.09±0.03ab |
As | 9.56±2.35a | 8.66±1.92b | 8.59±1.60b | 9.25±2.33a | 10.18±2.13a |
Pb | 25.05±5.18ab | 25.67±4.60ab | 25.27±5.24b | 25.83±4.83ab | 28.12±6.99a |
Cr | 68.66±10.67c | 61.95±10.68d | 67.09±13.25c | 72.57±13.92b | 79.59±11.87a |
Cu | 35.25±14.01a | 32.86±24.47ab | 33.35±11.48ab | 32.10±9.89b | 34.82±12.40ab |
Ni | 44.89±13.09ab | 45.15±10.06ab | 42.76±10.20b | 46.96±12.01a | 49.41±8.88ab |
Zn | 108.51±34.47ab | 112.04±78.72b | 113.79±36.62ab | 101.32±20.37a | 100.26±18.10ab |
Table 2 Heavy metals in soils of three types of arable land ecological conservation projects mg·kg-1
重金属元素 | 菌肥工程 | 蚯蚓工程 | 菌肥、蚯蚓工程对照点 | 两无化工程 | 两无化工程对照点 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cd | 0.19±0.060a | 0.18±0.06bc | 0.18±0.04ac | 0.17±0.05c | 0.21±0.05ab |
Hg | 0.08±0.033a | 0.09±0.04b | 0.09±0.06ab | 0.08±0.04ab | 0.09±0.03ab |
As | 9.56±2.35a | 8.66±1.92b | 8.59±1.60b | 9.25±2.33a | 10.18±2.13a |
Pb | 25.05±5.18ab | 25.67±4.60ab | 25.27±5.24b | 25.83±4.83ab | 28.12±6.99a |
Cr | 68.66±10.67c | 61.95±10.68d | 67.09±13.25c | 72.57±13.92b | 79.59±11.87a |
Cu | 35.25±14.01a | 32.86±24.47ab | 33.35±11.48ab | 32.10±9.89b | 34.82±12.40ab |
Ni | 44.89±13.09ab | 45.15±10.06ab | 42.76±10.20b | 46.96±12.01a | 49.41±8.88ab |
Zn | 108.51±34.47ab | 112.04±78.72b | 113.79±36.62ab | 101.32±20.37a | 100.26±18.10ab |
养分指标 | 菌肥工程 | 蚯蚓工程 | 菌肥、蚯蚓工程对照点 | 两无化工程 | 两无化工程对照点 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w(有效磷)/(mg·kg-1) | 83.10±62.79a | 80.58±64.02a | 88.14±70.22a | 38.07±33.47b | 25.06±13.35b |
w(速效钾)/(mg·kg-1) | 223.22±147.48a | 195.69±113.01b | 252.02±159.94a | 177.26±80.22b | 232.50±98.89ab |
w(全氮)/(g·kg-1) | 1.61±0.52b | 1.54±0.49ab | 1.55±0.54ab | 1.44±0.32a | 1.39±0.49ab |
Table 3 Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content of soils in three types of arable land ecological conservation projects
养分指标 | 菌肥工程 | 蚯蚓工程 | 菌肥、蚯蚓工程对照点 | 两无化工程 | 两无化工程对照点 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w(有效磷)/(mg·kg-1) | 83.10±62.79a | 80.58±64.02a | 88.14±70.22a | 38.07±33.47b | 25.06±13.35b |
w(速效钾)/(mg·kg-1) | 223.22±147.48a | 195.69±113.01b | 252.02±159.94a | 177.26±80.22b | 232.50±98.89ab |
w(全氮)/(g·kg-1) | 1.61±0.52b | 1.54±0.49ab | 1.55±0.54ab | 1.44±0.32a | 1.39±0.49ab |
组别 | 环境指数 | 养分指数 | 生物指数 | 土壤健康度综合评价指数 | 评价等级 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
菌肥工程 | 0.898±0.051c | 0.700±0.180a | 0.832±0.083b | 0.829±0.052b | 亚健康 |
蚯蚓工程 | 0.916±0.069b | 0.690±0.180a | 0.881±0.080a | 0.834±0.059b | 亚健康 |
两无化工程 | 0.931±0.032a | 0.629±0.173b | 0.830±0.074b | 0.843±0.050a | 亚健康 |
菌肥、蚯蚓工程对照点 | 0.894±0.027c | 0.687±0.149a | 0.630±0.170c | 0.683±0.087c | 不健康 |
两无化工程对照点 | 0.902±0.016bc | 0.616±0.153b | 0.534±0.209d | 0.651±0.111d | 不健康 |
Table 4 Soil health composite evaluation index calculation results
组别 | 环境指数 | 养分指数 | 生物指数 | 土壤健康度综合评价指数 | 评价等级 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
菌肥工程 | 0.898±0.051c | 0.700±0.180a | 0.832±0.083b | 0.829±0.052b | 亚健康 |
蚯蚓工程 | 0.916±0.069b | 0.690±0.180a | 0.881±0.080a | 0.834±0.059b | 亚健康 |
两无化工程 | 0.931±0.032a | 0.629±0.173b | 0.830±0.074b | 0.843±0.050a | 亚健康 |
菌肥、蚯蚓工程对照点 | 0.894±0.027c | 0.687±0.149a | 0.630±0.170c | 0.683±0.087c | 不健康 |
两无化工程对照点 | 0.902±0.016bc | 0.616±0.153b | 0.534±0.209d | 0.651±0.111d | 不健康 |
[1] |
ANDREWS S S, KARLEN D L, CAMBARDELLA C A, 2004. The soil management assessment framework[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68(6): 1945-62.
DOI URL |
[2] |
FINE A K, VAN ES H M, SCHINDELBECK R R, 2017. Statistics, scoring functions, and regional analysis of a comprehensive soil health database[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 81(3): 589-601.
DOI URL |
[3] |
HU X J, LIU J J, WEI D, et al., 2018. Soil bacterial communities under different long-term fertilization regimes in three locations across the black soil region of northeast China[J]. Pedosphere, 28(5): 751-763.
DOI URL |
[4] |
KARLEN D L, VEUM K S, SUDDUTH K A, et al., 2019. Soil health assessment: past accomplishments, current activities, and future opportunities[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 195: 104365.
DOI URL |
[5] | MACEWAN R J, 2007. Soil health for Victoria‟s agriculture context, terminology and concepts (MIS 07898 final report)[R/OL] https://vro.agriculture.vic.gov.au/dpi/vro/vrosite.nsf/pages/soil_health_mis07898. |
[6] |
MANERKAR M A, SEENA S, BARLOCHER F, 2008. Q-RT-PCR for assessing archaea, bacteria, and fungi during leaf decomposition in a stream[J]. Microbial Ecology, 56(3): 467-473.
DOI PMID |
[7] | MERRINGTON G, SAM F, DECLAN B, et al., 2006. The development and use of soil quality indicators for assessing the role of soil in environmental interactions[R/OL]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-development-and-use-of-soil-quality-indicators-for-assessing-the-role-of-soil-in-environmental-interactions. |
[8] |
MUELLER L, SCHINDLER U, GRAHAM T, et al., 2012. Assessing agricultural soil quality on a global scale[J]. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 58: S76-S82.
DOI URL |
[9] | WANG C, WALKER B D, REES H W, 1997. Chapter 15 Establishing a benchmark system for monitoring soil quality in Canada[J]. Developments in Soil Science, 25: 323-337. |
[10] | 陈浩, 2020. 几种作物与种植施肥模式对蚯蚓的影响[D]. 重庆: 西南大学. |
CHEN H, 2020. Effects of several crop and planting fertilization patterns on earthworms[D]. Chongqing: Southwest Univeristy. | |
[11] | 陈琳, 谷洁, 胡婷, 等, 2013. 生物有机肥对板栗土壤微生物群落代谢活性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 24(6): 1627-1632. |
CHEN L, GU J, HU T, et al., 2013. Effects of biological organic fertilizer on microbial community’s metabolic activity in a soil planted with chestnut (Castanea mollissima)[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(6): 1627-1632. | |
[12] | 陈正发, 史东梅, 何伟, 等, 2020. 基于 “要素-需求-调控” 的云南坡耕地质量评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 36(12): 236-246. |
CHEN Z F, SHI D N, HE W, et al., 2020. Quality evaluation of slope farmland in Yunnan Province based on “element-demand-regulation” framework[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 36(12): 236-246. | |
[13] | 高益, 黄卫峰, 冯加根, 等, 2021. 上海市崇明区水稻绿色生产关键技术[J]. 上海农业科技 (6): 42-43. |
GAO Y, HUANG W F, FENG J G, et al., 2021. Key technologies for green rice production in Chongming District, Shanghai[J]. Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology (6): 42-43. | |
[14] | 黄容, 高明, 万毅林, 等, 2016. 秸秆还田与化肥减量配施对稻-菜轮作下土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 环境科学, 37(11): 4446-4456. |
HUANG R, GAO M, WAN Y L, et al., 2016. Effects of straw in combination with reducing fertilization rate on soil nutrients and enzyme activity in the paddy-vegetable rotation soils[J]. Environmental Science, 37(11): 4446-4456. | |
[15] | 李超, 赵杨, 郭立君, 等, 2021. 不同冬季作物对稻田蚯蚓及蚯蚓粪产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 29(9): 1615-1624. |
LI C, ZHAO Y, GUO L J, et al., 2021. Effects of winter crops on the earthworm yield and earthworm cast in paddy fields[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecological Agriculture (in English), 29(9): 1615-1624. | |
[16] | 李烜桢, 骆永明, 侯德义, 2022. 土壤健康评估指标、框架及程序研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 59(3): 617-624. |
LI X Z, LUO Y M, HOU D Y, 2022. The indicators, framework and procedures for soil health: A critical review[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 59(3): 617-624. | |
[17] | 李武艳, 朱从谋, 和雪滢, 等, 2021. 经济发达地区耕地景观格局对土壤重金属污染风险的影响分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 37(16): 233-241. |
LI W Y, ZHU C M, HE X Y, et al., 2021. Impacts of cultivated land landscape patterns on the risk of soil heavy metal pollution in economically developed areas[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 37(16): 233-241. | |
[18] | 牛善栋, 方斌, 2019. 中国耕地保护制度70年:历史嬗变、现实探源及路径优化[J]. 中国土地科学, 33(10): 1-12. |
NIU S D, FANG B, 2019. Cultivated land protection system in China from 1949 to 2019: historical evolution, realistic origin exploration and path optimization[J]. China Land Science, 33(10): 1-12. | |
[19] |
茹淑华, 徐万强, 侯利敏, 等, 2019. 连续施用有机肥后重金属在土壤-作物系统中的积累与迁移特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 28(10): 2070-2078.
DOI |
RU S H, XU W Q, HOU L M, et al., 2019. Effects of continuous application of organic fertilizer on the accumulation and migration of heavy metals in soil-crop systems[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 28(10): 2070-2078. | |
[20] | 上海市人民政府, 2016. 崇明世界级生态岛发展“十三五”规划[R]. 上海市人民政府. |
Shanghai Municipal People's Government, 2016. The Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for the Development of Chongming World-Class Eco-Island[R]. Shanghai Municipal People's Government. | |
[21] | 上海市崇明区统计局, 2021. 崇明统计年鉴(2021年)[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社. |
Shanghai Chongming District Bureau of Statistics, 2021. Chongming Statistical Yearbook (2021)[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press. | |
[22] | 唐继伟, 徐久凯, 温延臣, 等, 2019. 长期单施有机肥和化肥对土壤养分和小麦产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 25(11): 1827-1834. |
TANG J W, XU J K, WEN Y C, et al., 2019. Effects of organic fertilizer and inorganic fertilizer on the wheat yields and soil nutrients under long-term fertilization[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 25(11): 1827-1834. | |
[23] | 王爱斌, 宋慧芳, 张流洋, 等, 2020. 生物肥和菌肥对蓝莓苗生长及土壤养分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 44(6): 63-70. |
WANG A B, SONG H F, ZHANG L Y, et al., 2020. Effect of biofertilizer and bacterial fertilizer on the growth and soil nutrients of blueberry seedlings[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 44(6): 63-70. | |
[24] | 王洪涛, 丁晶, 邵元虎, 等, 2022. 4种蚯蚓肠道微生物对砷毒性的响应差异研究[J]. 生态学报, 42(1): 379-389. |
WANG H T, DING J, SHAO Y H, et al., 2022. Comparative study on the responses of gut microbiota of four species of earthworms to arsenic toxicity[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(1): 379-389. | |
[25] | 王浩羽, 韦杰, 孙进宇, 等, 2022. 蚯蚓对不同pH值土壤中铬赋存及细菌群落的影响特征[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 41(7): 1472-1482. |
WANG H Y, WEI J, SUN J Y, et al., 2022. Effects of earthworms on the occurrence of chromium and bacterial communities in soils with different pH values[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 41(7): 1472-1482. | |
[26] | 王新哲, 黄建中, 2020. 城市总体规划文本表达技术实践特征与思考-以《上海市城市总体规划(2017-2035年)》为例[J]. 城市规划, 44(9): 85-92. |
WANG X Z, HUANG J Z, 2020. Characteristics and thinking of text expression technology in city master plan: A case study of Shanghai city master plan (2017-2035)[J]. City Planning Review, 44(9): 85-92. | |
[27] | 王雨薇, 李莉, 王新爽, 2019. 鹿粪和菌肥对菜地土壤Pb和Zn生物有效性的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 35(2): 234-241. |
WANG Y W, LI L, WANG X S, 2019. Effects of deer dung and microbial fertilizer on the bioavailability of Pb and Zn in vegetable soil[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 35(2): 234-241. | |
[28] |
唐宗, 周悟, 杨颢, 等, 2020. 基于交互效应Logistic回归模型的耕地质量评价方法研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 29(12): 2394-2403.
DOI |
TANG Z, ZHOU W, YANG H, et al., Evaluation of cultivated land quality based on interactive Logistic regression model[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 29(12): 2394-2403. | |
[29] | 吴克宁, 杨淇钧, 赵瑞, 2021. 耕地土壤健康及其评价探讨[J]. 土壤学报, 58(3): 537-544. |
WU K N, YANG Q J, ZHAO R, 2021. Discussion on soil health assessment of arable land in China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 58(3): 537-544. | |
[30] | 肖艳兰, 岳敏慧, 王朋, 等, 2020. 蚯蚓群落结构与分布的影响因素研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 43(7): 72-83. |
XIAO Y L, YUE M H, WANG P, et al., 2020. Factors influencing community structure and distribution of earthworm:a review[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(7): 72-83. | |
[31] | 杨淇钧, 吴克宁, 冯喆, 等, 2020. 大空间尺度土壤质量评价研究进展与启示[J]. 土壤学报, 57(3): 565-578. |
YANG Q J, WU K N, FENG Z, et al., 2020. Advancement and Revelation of the Research on Soil Quality Assessment on Large Spatial Scales[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 57(3): 565-578. | |
[32] | 杨颖, 郭志英, 潘恺, 等, 2022. 基于生态系统多功能性的农田土壤健康评价[J]. 土壤学报, 59(2): 461-475. |
YANG Y, GUO Z Y, PAN K, et al., 2022. Farmland soil health assessment based on ecosystem multi-functionality[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 59(2): 461-475. | |
[33] |
张梦佳, 文方芳, 张雪莲, 等, 2022. 田块尺度设施菜田土壤健康评价方法的初步构建与应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 38(7): 74-79.
DOI |
ZHANG M J, WEN F F, ZHANG X L, et al., 2022. Preliminary construction and application of soil health assessment method of facility vegetable fields on the field scale[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 38(7): 74-79.
DOI |
|
[34] | 赵瑞, 吴克宁, 刘亚男, 等, 2020. 基于生态系统服务功能视角的县域尺度土壤健康评价[J]. 土壤通报, 51(2): 269-279. |
ZHAO R, WU K N, LIU Y N, et al., 2020. Soil health evaluation at a county level based on soil ecosystem service function[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 51(2): 269-279. | |
[35] | 赵瑞, 吴克宁, 杨淇钧, 等, 2021. 基于土壤功能与胁迫的耕地土壤健康度评价方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 52(6): 333-343. |
ZHAO R, WU K N, YANG Q J, et al., 2021. Farmland soil health evaluation method based on soil function and soil threat[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 52(6): 333-343. |
[1] | DU Dandan, GAO Ruizhong, FANG Lijing, XIE Longmei. Spatial Variation of Soil Heavy Metals and Their Responses to Physicochemical Factors of Salt Lake Basin in Arid Area [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(6): 1123-1132. |
[2] | LI Chuanfu, ZHU Taochuan, MING Yufei, YANG Yuxuan, GAO Shu, DONG Zhi, LI Yongqiang, JIAO Shuying. Effect of Organic Fertilizer and Desulphurized Gypsum on Soil Aggregates and Organic Carbon and Its Fractions Contents in the Saline-alkali Soil of the Yellow River Delta [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 878-888. |
[3] | CHEN Junfang, WU Xian, LIU Xiaolin, LIU Juan, YANG Jiarong, LIU Yu. Shaping Characteristics of Elemental Stoichiometry on Microbial Diversity under Different Soil Water Contents [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 898-909. |
[4] | DONG Zhijin, ZHANG Chengchun, ZHAN Xiuli, ZHANG Weifu. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Nutrients of Biological Soil Crusts and Their Underlying Soil of Sandy Land in the East of Yellow River in Ningxia [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 910-919. |
[5] | ZHOU Qinyuan, DONG Quanmin, Wang Fangcao, LIU Yuzhen, FENG Bin, YANG Xiaoxia, YU Yang, ZHANG Chunping, CAO Quan, LIU Wenting. Effects of Mixed Grazing on Aggregates and Organic Carbon in Rhizosphere Soil of Stellera chamaejasme in Alpine Grassland [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(4): 660-667. |
[6] | PAN Yuling, QU Xiangning, LI Qing, WANG Lei, WANG Xiaoping, TAN Peng, CUI Geng, AN Yu, TONG Shouzheng. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Physicochemical Factors and Their Response to Microtopography in a Typical Beach Wetland of the Yellow River in Ningxia [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(4): 668-677. |
[7] | ZHAO Weibin, TANG Li, WANG Song, LIU Lingling, WANG Shufeng, XIAO Jiang, CHEN Guangcai. Improvement Effect of Two Biochars on Coastal Saline-Alkaline Soil [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(4): 678-686. |
[8] | FENG Shuna, LÜ Jialong, HE Hailong. Effect of KI Leaching on the Hg (Ⅱ) Removal of Loess Soil and the Physicochemical Properties of the Soil [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(4): 776-783. |
[9] | CHEN Minyi, ZHU Hanghai, SHE Weiduo, YIN Guangcai, HUANG Zuzhao, YANG Qiaoling. Health Risk Assessment and Source Apportionment of Soil Heavy Metals at A Legacy Shipyard Site in Pearl River Delta [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(4): 794-804. |
[10] | ZHANG Lin, QI Shi, ZHOU Piao, WU Bingchen, ZHANG Dai, ZHANG Yan. Study on Influencing Factors of Soil Organic Carbon Content in Mixed Broad-leaved and Coniferous Forests Land in Beijing Mountainous Areas [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 450-458. |
[11] | QIN Hao, LI Mengai, GAO Jin, CHEN Kailong, ZHANG Yinbo, ZHANG Feng. Composition and Diversity of Soil Bacterial Communities in Shrub at Different Altitudes in Luya Mountain [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 459-468. |
[12] | TANG Haiming, SHI Lihong, WEN Li, CHENG Kaikai, LI Chao, LONG Zedong, XIAO Zhiwu, LI Weiyan, GUO Yong. Effects of Different Long-term Fertilizer Managements on Rhizosphere Soil Nitrogen in the Double-cropping Rice Field [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 492-499. |
[13] | LIU Kanghan, ZHENG Liugen, ZHANG Liqun, DING Dan, SHAN Shifeng. Effect of Complex Plant Derived Activator on the Remediation of As Contaminated Soil by Pteris vittata [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 635-642. |
[14] | FAN Huilin, ZHANG Jiamin, LI Huan, WANG Yanling. Study on the Profile Storage Pattern and Loss Risk of Phosphorus in Sloping Paddy Red Soil [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(2): 283-291. |
[15] | SONG Xiaoshuai, DING Wuquan, LIU Xinmin, LI Tingzhen. Study on the Mechanism of Ion Specificity Effect on the Pore Condition of Purple Soil [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(2): 292-298. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn