Ecology and Environmental Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 1532-1544.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.10.004
• Research Article [Ecology] • Previous Articles Next Articles
Hu Zixuan1(
), Bai Mingyue1, Liu Ming1, Guo Jianbin1,2,*(
), Wang Xiao3, Chen Chunyan1
Received:2025-12-30
Revised:2026-07-03
Accepted:2026-07-29
Online:2026-10-18
Published:2026-10-21
胡紫璇1(
), 白铭悦1, 刘铭1, 郭建斌1,2,*(
), 王晓3, 陈春艳1
通讯作者:
E-mail: 作者简介:胡紫璇(2002年生),女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为生态环境地理。E-mail: huzixuan0326@163.com
基金资助:CLC Number:
Hu Zixuan, Bai Mingyue, Liu Ming, Guo Jianbin, Wang Xiao, Chen Chunyan. Response and Simulation of Stem Water Storage under Different Soil Moisture Conditions in a Larix principis-rupprechtii Forest[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(10): 1532-1544.
胡紫璇, 白铭悦, 刘铭, 郭建斌, 王晓, 陈春艳. 华北落叶松人工林树干储水对不同土壤水分的响应及其模拟[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(10): 1532-1544.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.10.004
| 样树 | 胸径/cm | 树高/m | 边材面积/cm2 | 细根主要分布深度/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.1 | 17.2 | 98.7 | 0-30 |
| 2 | 19.9 | 21.2 | 157.0 | 0-35 |
| 3 | 22.3 | 20.6 | 201.4 | 0-40 |
| 4 | 26.8 | 22.2 | 301.2 | 0-40 |
Table 1 Basic information of the sample trees
| 样树 | 胸径/cm | 树高/m | 边材面积/cm2 | 细根主要分布深度/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.1 | 17.2 | 98.7 | 0-30 |
| 2 | 19.9 | 21.2 | 157.0 | 0-35 |
| 3 | 22.3 | 20.6 | 201.4 | 0-40 |
| 4 | 26.8 | 22.2 | 301.2 | 0-40 |
| 单一因子 | 响应函数 | 响应关系 | 阈值 | R2 | F | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 潜在蒸散 | f(Ep)=a1Ep2+b1Ep | f(Ep)= −0.47×Ep2+3.46×Ep | 3.68 | 0.99 | 277.614 | 0.000* |
| 叶面积指数 | f(L)=b2×(1−ec2L) | f(L)=2.53×(1−e−0.44L) | 3.50 | 0.99 | 400.309 | 0.000* |
| 0-20 cm土壤相对含水量 | f(θ 0‒20 cm)=a3−b3×ec3θ0‒20 cm | f(θ 0‒20 cm)=3.52−3.82×e−8.79θ0‒20 cm | 0.35 | 0.98 | 1026.859 | 0.000* |
| 20-40 cm土壤相对含水量 | f(θ 20‒40 cm)=a4−b4×ec4θ20‒40 cm | f(θ 20‒40 cm)=3.35−3.25×e−8.24θ20‒40 cm | 0.36 | 0.97 | 939.113 | 0.000* |
| 40-60 cm土壤相对含水量 | f(θ 40‒60 cm)=a5−b5×ec5θ40‒60 cm | f(θ 40‒60 cm)=3.38−4.02×e−8.57θ40‒60 cm | 0.37 | 0.97 | 760.894 | 0.000* |
Table 2 The response relationship and its threshold of stem water storage to single factor
| 单一因子 | 响应函数 | 响应关系 | 阈值 | R2 | F | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 潜在蒸散 | f(Ep)=a1Ep2+b1Ep | f(Ep)= −0.47×Ep2+3.46×Ep | 3.68 | 0.99 | 277.614 | 0.000* |
| 叶面积指数 | f(L)=b2×(1−ec2L) | f(L)=2.53×(1−e−0.44L) | 3.50 | 0.99 | 400.309 | 0.000* |
| 0-20 cm土壤相对含水量 | f(θ 0‒20 cm)=a3−b3×ec3θ0‒20 cm | f(θ 0‒20 cm)=3.52−3.82×e−8.79θ0‒20 cm | 0.35 | 0.98 | 1026.859 | 0.000* |
| 20-40 cm土壤相对含水量 | f(θ 20‒40 cm)=a4−b4×ec4θ20‒40 cm | f(θ 20‒40 cm)=3.35−3.25×e−8.24θ20‒40 cm | 0.36 | 0.97 | 939.113 | 0.000* |
| 40-60 cm土壤相对含水量 | f(θ 40‒60 cm)=a5−b5×ec5θ40‒60 cm | f(θ 40‒60 cm)=3.38−4.02×e−8.57θ40‒60 cm | 0.37 | 0.97 | 760.894 | 0.000* |
| 系数 | 值 | R2 | En | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a1 | −0.20 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 154 |
| b1 | 1.15 | |||
| b2 | 2.66 | |||
| c2 | −1.01 | |||
| a3+a4+a5 | 3.90 | |||
| b3 | 2.32 | |||
| c3 | −9.85 | |||
| b4 | 4.12 | |||
| c4 | −9.89 | |||
| b5 | 9.95 | |||
| c5 | −3.11 |
Table 3 Optimal parameter values of Jarvis-Stewart model for stem water storage response
| 系数 | 值 | R2 | En | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a1 | −0.20 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 154 |
| b1 | 1.15 | |||
| b2 | 2.66 | |||
| c2 | −1.01 | |||
| a3+a4+a5 | 3.90 | |||
| b3 | 2.32 | |||
| c3 | −9.85 | |||
| b4 | 4.12 | |||
| c4 | −9.89 | |||
| b5 | 9.95 | |||
| c5 | −3.11 |
Figure 8 The relative contribution rate of soil water content in 0-20 cm, 20-40 cm, 40-60 cm to stem water storage release under different water conditions
| [1] |
Andriantelomanana T, Améglio T, Delzon S, et al., 2024. Unpacking the point of no return under drought in poplar: Insight from stem diameter variation[J]. New Phytologist, 242(2): 466-478.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
Attia Z, Domec J C, Oren R, et al., 2015. Growth and physiological responses of isohydric and anisohydric poplars to drought[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66(14): 4373-4381.
DOI PMID |
| [3] |
Čermák J, Kučera J, Bauerle W L, et al., 2007. Tree water storage and its diurnal dynamics related to sap flow and changes in stem volume in old-growth Douglas-fir trees[J]. Tree Physiology, 27(2): 181-198.
DOI PMID |
| [4] |
Fang W W, Lu N, Zhang Y, et al., 2018. Responses of nighttime sap flow to atmospheric and soil dryness and its potential roles for shrubs on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 11(5): 717-729.
DOI |
| [5] |
Gessler A, Bächli L, Rouholahnejad F E, et al., 2022. Drought reduces water uptake in beech from the drying topsoil, but no compensatory uptake occurs from deeper soil layers[J]. New Phytologist, 233(1): 194-206.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
Goldstein G, Andrade J L, Meinzer F C, et al., 1998. Stem water storage and diurnal patterns of water use in tropical forest canopy trees[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 21(4): 397-406.
DOI URL |
| [7] | Jarvis P G, 1976. The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 273(927): 593-610. |
| [8] |
Jiao L, Lu N, Fang W, et al., 2019. Determining the independent impact of soil water on forest transpiration: A case study of a black locust plantation in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 572: 671-681.
DOI |
| [9] |
Klein T, Rotenberg E, Cohen-Hilaleh E, et al., 2014. Quantifying transpirable soil water and its relations to tree water use dynamics in a water-limited pine forest[J]. Ecohydrology, 7(2): 409-419.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
Li Q, Jiao L, Xue R, et al., 2024. Seasonal and depth dynamics of soil moisture affect trees on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Forests, 15(5): 752.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
Li Y, Shi F, Li X, et al., 2022. Divergent roles of deep soil water uptake in seasonal tree growth under natural drought events in North China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 324: 109102.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
Liu Z, Yu X, Jia G, 2018. Water utilization characteristics of typical vegetation in the rocky mountain area of Beijing, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 91: 249-258.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
Mccuen R H, Knight Z, Cutter A G, 2006. Evaluation of the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency index[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 11(6): 597-602.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
Meinzer F C, James S A, Goldstein G, 2004. Dynamics of transpiration, sap flow and use of stored water in tropical forest canopy trees[J]. Tree Physiology, 24(8): 901-909.
PMID |
| [15] |
Meinzer F C, James S A, Goldstein G, et al., 2003. Whole-tree water transport scales with sapwood capacitance in tropical forest canopy trees[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 26(7): 1147-1155.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
Oren R, Sperry J S, Katul G G, et al., 1999. Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 22(12): 1515-1526.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
Qiu J, Crow W T, Dong J, et al., 2020. Model representation of the coupling between evapotranspiration and soil water content at different depths[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24(2): 581-594.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
Spanner G C, Gimenez B O, Wright C L, et al., 2022. Dry season transpiration and soil water dynamics in the Central Amazon[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13: 825097.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
Sun S J, Meng P, Zhang J S, et al., 2011. Variation in soil water uptake and its effect on plant water status in Juglans regia L. during dry and wet seasons[J]. Tree Physiology, 31(12): 1378-1389.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
Thivierge-Lampron J, Girona M M, Pappas C, et al., 2025. Stem water storage dynamics of three boreal tree species under short-term drought[J]. Forests, 16(9): 1448.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
Wang Y, Wang Y, Li Z, et al., 2020. Interannual variation of transpiration and its modeling of a larch plantation in semiarid Northwest China[J]. Forests, 11(12): 1303.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
Whitley R, Zeppel M, Armstrong N, et al., 2008. A modified Jarvis-Stewart model for predicting stand-scale transpiration of an Australian native forest[J]. Plant and Soil, 305(1): 35-47.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
Yang B, Wen X, Sun X, 2015. Seasonal variations in depth of water uptake for a subtropical coniferous plantation subjected to drought in an East Asian monsoon region[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 201: 218-228.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
Yang Y, Fu B, 2017. Soil water migration in the unsaturated zone of semiarid region in China from isotope evidence[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(3): 1757-1767.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
Yu S, Guo J, Liu Z, et al., 2021. Assessing the impact of soil moisture on canopy transpiration using a modified Jarvis-Stewart model[J]. Water, 13(19): 2720.
DOI URL |
| [26] |
Zhang B, Xu Q, Liu S, et al., 2024. Unraveling the effects of plant and soil properties on tree water absorption in pure and mixed forests across subtropical China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 353: 110078.
DOI URL |
| [27] |
Zhang Y P, Jiang Y, Wang B, et al., 2018. Seasonal water use by Larix principis-rupprechtii in an alpine habitat[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 409: 47-55.
DOI URL |
| [28] |
Zhu X, Yu G, Wang Q, et al., 2014. Seasonal dynamics of water use efficiency of typical forest and grassland ecosystems in China[J]. Journal of Forest Research, 19(1): 70-76.
DOI URL |
| [29] |
Zweifel R, Zimmermann L, Newbery D M, 2005. Modeling tree water deficit from microclimate: An approach to quantifying drought stress[J]. Tree Physiology, 25(2): 147-156.
PMID |
| [30] | 白铭悦, 郭建斌, 刘铭, 等, 2025. 华北落叶松树干液流对不同降雨事件的响应[J]. 农业工程学报, 41(9): 227-236. |
| Bai M Y, Guo J B, Liu M, et al., 2025. Response of stem sap flow of Larix principis-rupprechtii to different rainfall events[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 41(9): 227-236. | |
| [31] |
韩磊, 孙兆军, 展秀丽, 等, 2015. 宁夏河东沙区柠条植株叶片蒸腾对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 24(5): 756-761.
DOI |
| Han L, Sun Z J, Zhan X L, et al., 2015. Research on leaf transpiration response to soil water stress of Caragana korshinskii Kom. in Hedong Sandy Land of Ningxia[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 24(5): 756-761. | |
| [32] |
韩磊, 展秀丽, 王芳, 等, 2018. 河东沙区侧柏树干液流与蒸腾驱动因子的时滞效应研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 27(8): 1417-1423.
DOI |
| Han L, Zhan X L, Wang F, et al., 2018. Time lag effect between stem sap flow and driving factors of transpiration of Platycladus orientalis in east sandy land of Yellow River[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 27(8): 1417-1423. | |
| [33] |
黄玥, 卫伟, 陈胜楠, 2024. 黄土高原侧柏和柠条树干液流日变化及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 33(3): 389-398.
DOI |
| Huang Y, Wei W, Chen S N, 2024. Sap flow characteristics of Platycladus orientalis and Caragana korshinskii and its response to environmental factors in the Loess Plateau[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 33(3): 389-398. | |
| [34] |
刘铭, 郭建斌, 林雪雯, 等, 2025. 六盘山华北落叶松液流速率对干旱类型的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 36(6): 1690-1698.
DOI |
| Liu M, Guo J B, Lin X W, et al., 2025. Response of sap flow rate of Larix principis-rupprechtii to drought types in Liupan Mountains[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 36(6): 1690-1698. | |
| [35] | 刘泽彬, 王彦辉, 徐丽宏, 等, 2017. 六盘山华北落叶松林坡面的土壤水分时间稳定性[J]. 水土保持学报, 31(1): 153-159,165. |
| Liu Z B, Wang Y H, Xu L H, et al., 2017. Temporal stability of soil moisture on slopes of Larix principis-rupprechtii forest in Liupan Mountains[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 31(1): 153-159, 165. | |
| [36] |
秦颢萍, 刘泽彬, 郭建斌, 等, 2021. 环境和冠层结构对华北落叶松林树干液流的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 32(5): 1681-1689.
DOI |
| Qin H P, Liu Z B, Guo J B, et al., 2021. Effects of environment and canopy structure on stem sap flow in a Larix principis-rupprechtii forest[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 32(5): 1681-1689. | |
| [37] |
于松平, 刘泽彬, 郭建斌, 等, 2021. 六盘山华北落叶松林分蒸腾特征及其影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 45(1): 131-140.
DOI |
| Yu S P, Liu Z B, Guo J B, et al., 2021. Transpiration characteristics and influencing factors of Larix principis-rupprechtii forest in Liupan Mountains[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 45(1): 131-140. | |
| [38] |
张国晶, 颜青松, 秦文强, 等, 2025. 基于梯度提升回归树的三江源地区植被指数的预测方法研究[J]. 草地学报, 33(5): 1655-1668.
DOI |
| Zhang G J, Yan Q S, Qin W Q, et al., 2025. Prediction method of vegetation index in the Three-River Headwaters Region based on gradient boosting regression tree[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 33(5): 1655-1668. | |
| [39] | 张中惠, 王彦辉, 郭建斌, 等, 2022. 六盘山华北落叶松单木树高对立地因子和林分特征的响应[J]. 林业科学研究, 35(1): 1-9. |
| Zhang Z H, Wang Y H, Guo J B, et al., 2022. Response of individual tree height of Larix principis-rupprechtii to site factors and stand characteristics in Liupan Mountains[J]. Forest Research, 35(1): 1-9. |
| [1] | YIN Yange, CAO Guangchao, CHEN Zongyan, YUAN Jie, ZHAO Wei, DAI Jiafang. Responses of Soil Total Organic Carbon to Elevation Gradient in Pice crassifolia Kom. Forests on the Southern Slope of the Qilian Mountains [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(6): 843-855. |
| [2] | LI Yanlin, XU Hongwei, XU Lin, LUO Ziteng, YUAN Yaling, TAN Bo. Effects of Strip Clearcutting on the Composition and Stability of Soil Water-stable Aggregates in Cryptomeria fortunei Plantations [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(2): 223-231. |
| [3] | CHANG Boran, CHEN Rulan, WANG Biao, LAN Tian, DENG Lin, XUE Huiying. Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon and Its Component Distribution in Different Forest Stand Types on Mount Zola in Southeastern Tibet [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(10): 1495-1505. |
| [4] | LIN Dandan, BI Huaxing, ZHAO Danyang, GUAN Ning, HAN Jindan, GUO Yanjie. Soil Organic Carbon Fractions and Carbon Pool Characteristics of Robinia pseudoacacia Forests with Different Densities in the Loess Region of Western Shanxi Province [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(3): 379-388. |
| [5] | QIN Jiaqi, XIAO Zhirou, MING Angang, ZHU Hao, TENG Jinqian, LIANG Zeli, TAO Yi, QIN Lin. Effect of Monoculture and Mixed Plantation with Coniferous and Broadleaved Tree Species on Soil Microbial Carbon Cycle Functional Gene Abundance [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(10): 1719-1731. |
| [6] | CHEN Yao, LI Yunhong, SHAO Yingnan, LIU Yulong, LIU Yankun. Study on Species Diversity and Soil Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Broad-leaved Pinus koraiensis Forest [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 31(4): 679-687. |
| [7] | ZHAO Junyu, HUANG Xiaorui, SHI Yuanyuan, SONG Xianchong, QIN Zuoyu, TANG Jian. FTIR Characteristics of Rhizosphere Soil of Multi-generation Continuous Eucalyptus Plantation in South Subtropical Region [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 31(4): 688-694. |
| [8] | QI Xuelian, GE Xiaomin, QIAN Zhuangzhuang, ZHANG Kang, ZHENG Xu, QIAN Qi, DING Hui, TANG Luozhong. Differences of Soil Properties between Natural Mixed Coniferous and Broad-leaved Forest and Moso Bamboo Plantation in Wuyi Mountains [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 30(8): 1599-1606. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Website Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Add: 808# Tianyuan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou. 510650.
Institute of Eco-environmental and Soil Sciences, Guangdong Academy of Sciences
Tel/Fax: 020-87024961; E-mail: editor@jeesci.com
Support by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd., E-mail: support@magtech.com.cn