Ecology and Environmental Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 1545-1554.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.10.005
• Research Article [Ecology] • Previous Articles Next Articles
He Ailin1(
), Chang Shunli1, Li Jimei2,3,*(
), Wan Yan4, Wu Dongsheng4, Tuerhong Nuerdong4
Received:2026-01-05
Revised:2026-07-04
Accepted:2026-08-24
Online:2026-10-18
Published:2026-10-21
何爱琳1(
), 常顺利1, 李吉玫2,3,*(
), 万燕4, 吴东升4, 吐尔洪·努尔东4
通讯作者:
E-mail: 作者简介:何爱琳(2001年生),女,硕士研究生,主要从事森林群落生态学研究。E-mail: 3404660288@qq.com
基金资助:CLC Number:
He Ailin, Chang Shunli, Li Jimei, Wan Yan, Wu Dongsheng, Tuerhong Nuerdong. Patterns and Drivers of Alpha and Beta Diversity Across Plant Growth Forms in a Permanent Plot of Picea schrenkiana Forest in Tomur Peak, Xinjiang[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(10): 1545-1554.
何爱琳, 常顺利, 李吉玫, 万燕, 吴东升, 吐尔洪·努尔东. 新疆托木尔峰雪岭云杉林固定样地不同生长型植物α与β多样性特征及影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(10): 1545-1554.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.10.005
| 物种 | 所属科 | 相对多度/ % | 相对 频度/% | 相对 优势度/% | 重要值/ % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 雪岭云杉 Picea schrenkiana | 松科 | 90.0 | 38.8 | 95.7 | 74.8 |
| 天山花楸 Sorbus tianschanica | 蔷薇科 | 4.00 | 24.0 | 1.88 | 9.97 |
| 疏花蔷薇Rosa laxa | 蔷薇科 | 3.27 | 17.8 | 0.17 | 7.09 |
| 旱柳Salix matsudana | 杨柳科 | 2.06 | 10.9 | 1.91 | 4.94 |
| 小叶忍冬 Lonicera microphylla | 忍冬科 | 0.52 | 5.43 | 0.04 | 2.00 |
| 黄果山楂 Crataegus altaica | 蔷薇科 | 0.12 | 1.55 | 0.01 | 0.56 |
| 黑果栒子 Cotoneaster melanocarpus | 蔷薇科 | 0.08 | 1.55 | 0.01 | 0.55 |
Table 1 Species composition and importance values of woody plants in the plot
| 物种 | 所属科 | 相对多度/ % | 相对 频度/% | 相对 优势度/% | 重要值/ % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 雪岭云杉 Picea schrenkiana | 松科 | 90.0 | 38.8 | 95.7 | 74.8 |
| 天山花楸 Sorbus tianschanica | 蔷薇科 | 4.00 | 24.0 | 1.88 | 9.97 |
| 疏花蔷薇Rosa laxa | 蔷薇科 | 3.27 | 17.8 | 0.17 | 7.09 |
| 旱柳Salix matsudana | 杨柳科 | 2.06 | 10.9 | 1.91 | 4.94 |
| 小叶忍冬 Lonicera microphylla | 忍冬科 | 0.52 | 5.43 | 0.04 | 2.00 |
| 黄果山楂 Crataegus altaica | 蔷薇科 | 0.12 | 1.55 | 0.01 | 0.56 |
| 黑果栒子 Cotoneaster melanocarpus | 蔷薇科 | 0.08 | 1.55 | 0.01 | 0.55 |
| 物种 | 所属科 | 相对 多度/% | 相对 高度/% | 相对 盖度/% | 重要值/ % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 三穗薹草 Carex tristachya | 莎草科 | 34.3 | 8.22 | 15.2 | 19.2 |
| 紫苞鸢尾Iris ruthenica | 鸢尾科 | 13.8 | 11.0 | 15.0 | 13.3 |
| 稗草 Echinochloa crus-galli | 禾本科 | 10.5 | 5.58 | 8.38 | 8.15 |
| 羊角芹 Aegopodium alpestre | 伞形科 | 6.74 | 5.63 | 5.34 | 5.90 |
| 山地糙苏 Phlomoides oreophila | 唇形科 | 1.60 | 6.04 | 9.95 | 5.86 |
| 老鹳草 Geranium wilfordii | 牻牛儿苗科 | 2.16 | 8.31 | 4.68 | 5.05 |
| 葛缕子Carum carvi | 伞形科 | 3.90 | 3.90 | 3.36 | 4.42 |
| 铁线莲Clematis | 毛茛科 | 6.13 | 6.13 | 4.51 | 4.23 |
| 高山黄芪 Astragalus alpinus | 豆科 | 5.02 | 5.02 | 4.58 | 4.22 |
| 岩参Cicerbita azurea | 菊科 | 3.16 | 4.39 | 4.41 | 3.99 |
Table 2 Species composition and ranked importance values (top 10) of herbaceous plants in the plot
| 物种 | 所属科 | 相对 多度/% | 相对 高度/% | 相对 盖度/% | 重要值/ % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 三穗薹草 Carex tristachya | 莎草科 | 34.3 | 8.22 | 15.2 | 19.2 |
| 紫苞鸢尾Iris ruthenica | 鸢尾科 | 13.8 | 11.0 | 15.0 | 13.3 |
| 稗草 Echinochloa crus-galli | 禾本科 | 10.5 | 5.58 | 8.38 | 8.15 |
| 羊角芹 Aegopodium alpestre | 伞形科 | 6.74 | 5.63 | 5.34 | 5.90 |
| 山地糙苏 Phlomoides oreophila | 唇形科 | 1.60 | 6.04 | 9.95 | 5.86 |
| 老鹳草 Geranium wilfordii | 牻牛儿苗科 | 2.16 | 8.31 | 4.68 | 5.05 |
| 葛缕子Carum carvi | 伞形科 | 3.90 | 3.90 | 3.36 | 4.42 |
| 铁线莲Clematis | 毛茛科 | 6.13 | 6.13 | 4.51 | 4.23 |
| 高山黄芪 Astragalus alpinus | 豆科 | 5.02 | 5.02 | 4.58 | 4.22 |
| 岩参Cicerbita azurea | 菊科 | 3.16 | 4.39 | 4.41 | 3.99 |
| 环境因子 | 木本植物 | 草本植物 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| βjac | βjtu | βjne | βjac | βjtu | βjne | ||
| 海拔ALT | 0.13** | −0.12 | 0.22*** | 0.16** | 0.09* | 0.05 | |
| 坡度SL | 0.03 | 0.05 | −0.01 | 0.12* | 0.13** | −0.05 | |
| 坡向ASP | −0.02 | 0.01 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.002 | 0.03 | |
| 坡位SLP | 0.07* | −0.05 | 0.09* | 0.18*** | 0.20*** | −0.08 | |
| 凹凸度CON | 0.11** | −0.01 | 0.10* | 0.10* | 0.09* | −0.02 | |
| 林分密度FSD | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.30*** | 0.17** | 0.10* | |
| 郁闭度DEN | 0.14** | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.42*** | 0.31*** | 0.03 | |
| 平均胸径ADBH | 0.09* | −0.06 | 0.12* | 0.16* | 0.14** | −0.04 | |
| 平均树高ATH | 0.18*** | 0.14* | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.13* | −0.13 | |
| 胸高断面积BA | 0.08* | −0.11 | 0.15** | 0.15* | 0.13* | −0.04 | |
Table 3 Spearman correlations and Mantel tests between β-diversity (βjac), its turnover (βjtu) and nestedness (βjne) components, and environmental variables
| 环境因子 | 木本植物 | 草本植物 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| βjac | βjtu | βjne | βjac | βjtu | βjne | ||
| 海拔ALT | 0.13** | −0.12 | 0.22*** | 0.16** | 0.09* | 0.05 | |
| 坡度SL | 0.03 | 0.05 | −0.01 | 0.12* | 0.13** | −0.05 | |
| 坡向ASP | −0.02 | 0.01 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.002 | 0.03 | |
| 坡位SLP | 0.07* | −0.05 | 0.09* | 0.18*** | 0.20*** | −0.08 | |
| 凹凸度CON | 0.11** | −0.01 | 0.10* | 0.10* | 0.09* | −0.02 | |
| 林分密度FSD | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.30*** | 0.17** | 0.10* | |
| 郁闭度DEN | 0.14** | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.42*** | 0.31*** | 0.03 | |
| 平均胸径ADBH | 0.09* | −0.06 | 0.12* | 0.16* | 0.14** | −0.04 | |
| 平均树高ATH | 0.18*** | 0.14* | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.13* | −0.13 | |
| 胸高断面积BA | 0.08* | −0.11 | 0.15** | 0.15* | 0.13* | −0.04 | |
| [1] |
Anderson M J, Crist T O, Chase J M, et al., 2011. Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: A roadmap for the practicing ecologist[J]. Ecology Letters, 14(1): 19-28.
DOI PMID |
| [2] |
Arnell M, Eriksson O, 2022. Landscape-scale range filling and dispersal limitation of woody plants[J]. Journal of Biogeography, 49: 2028-2036.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
Baselga A, 2010. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19(1): 134-143.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
Compagnoni A, Levin S, Childs D Z, et al., 2021. Herbaceous perennial plants with short generation time have stronger responses to climate anomalies than those with longer generation time[J]. Nature Communications, 12(1): 1824.
DOI PMID |
| [5] |
Deng T T, Du Q Q, Zhu Y, et al., 2025. Environmental drivers of herbaceous plant diversity in the understory community of a warm-temperate forest[J]. Plant Diversity, 47(2): 282-290.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
Farzam M, Ejtehadi H, 2017. Effects of drought and slope aspect on canopy facilitation in a mountainous rangeland[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 10(4): 626-633.
DOI |
| [7] |
Geng Q W, Muhammad A, Yuan Z X, et al., 2022. Plant species composition and diversity along successional gradients in arid and semi-arid regions of China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 524: 120542.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
Gou X X, Zhang T W, Yu S L, et al., 2023. Climate response of Picea schrenkiana based on tree-ring width and maximum density[J]. Dendrochronologia, 78: 126067.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
Haq S M, Rashid I, Waheed M, et al., 2023. From forest floor to tree top: Partitioning of biomass and carbon stock in multiple strata of forest vegetation in Western Himalaya[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(7): 812.
DOI |
| [10] |
He R, Hu M, Shi H, et al., 2022. Patterns of species diversity and its determinants in a temperate deciduous broad-leaved forest[J]. Forest Ecosystems, 9(1): 100062.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
Legendre P, 2014. Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23(11): 1324-1334.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
Li L P, Wang X P, Zerbe S, et al., 2011. Altitudinal patterns of stand structure and herb layer diversity of Picea schrenkiana forests in the central Tianshan Mountains, Northwest China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 3(4): 254-260.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
Liu Y Y, Qian H, Zhou Y D, 2025. Inconsistent geographical patterns of phylogenetic relatedness among different plant growth forms: A case study in woody and herbaceous angiosperms of China[J]. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 63(3): 767-777.
DOI URL |
| [14] | Nettesheim F C, Garbin M L, Rajao P H, et al., 2018. Environment is more relevant than spatial structure as a driver of regional variation in tropical tree community richness and composition[J]. Plant Ecology & Diversity, 11(1): 27-40. |
| [15] |
Poppenwimer T, Mayrose I, Demalach N, 2023. Revising the global biogeography of annual and perennial plants[J]. Nature, 624(7990): 109-114.
DOI |
| [16] |
Rosauer D, Laffan S W, Crisp M D, et al., 2009. Phylogenetic endemism: A new approach for identifying geographical concentrations of evolutionary history[J]. Molecular ecology, 18(19): 4061-4072.
DOI PMID |
| [17] |
Šímová I, Violle C, Svenning J C, et al., 2018. Spatial patterns and climate relationships of major plant traits in the New World differ between woody and herbaceous species[J]. Journal of Biogeography, 45(4): 895-916.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
Wang W D, Zhao J J, Zhang B J, et al., 2024. Patterns and drivers of tree species diversity in a coniferous forest of northwest China[J]. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 7: 1333232.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
Xu J S, Chai Y F, Wang M, et al., 2018. Shifts in plant community assembly processes across growth forms along a habitat severity gradient: A test of the plant functional trait approach[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9: 180.
DOI PMID |
| [20] |
Yang Q L, Sun G L, Wang G Y, et al., 2025. Drought intensity affects radial growth and recovery of P. schrenkiana at varying elevations in the Western Tianshan Mountains, China[J]. Forest Ecosystems, 14: 100370.
DOI URL |
| [21] | 阿地来·赛提尼亚孜, 常顺利, 张毓涛, 等, 2021. 天山雪岭云杉林群落组成与结构10年动态变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 40(10): 3033-3040. |
| Adilai Saitiniyazi, Chang S L, Zhang Y T, et al., 2021. Decadal dynamics of community composition and structure in Picea schrenkiana forest in the Tianshan Mountains[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 40(10): 3033-3040. | |
| [22] | 邓逸飞, 王郅臻, 段文标, 等, 2025. 小兴安岭地区不同演替阶段林下植物多样性及其优势种生态位特征[J]. 生态学报, 45(12): 6000-6011. |
| Deng Y F, Wang Z Z, Duan W B, et al., 2025. Understory plant diversity and niche characteristics of dominant species across successional stages in the Xiaoxing’an Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 45(12): 6000-6011. | |
| [23] |
樊凡, 赵联军, 马添翼, 等, 2022. 川西王朗亚高山暗针叶林25.2 hm2动态监测样地物种组成与群落结构特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 46(9): 1005-1017.
DOI |
|
Fan F, Zhao L J, Ma T Y, et al., 2022. Species composition and community structure in a 25.2 hm2 permanent plot of subalpine dark coniferous forest in Wanglang, western Sichuan[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 46(9): 1005-1017.
DOI |
|
| [24] | 黄继红, 依里帆·艾克拜尔江, 程瑞明, 等, 2025. 新疆西天山雪岭云杉群落动态变化及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 33(11): 147-158. |
| Huang J H, Akberjan E, Cheng R M, et al., 2025. Dynamics of the Picea schrenkiana community in the west Tianshan Mountains of Xinjiang and their influencing factors[J]. Biodiversity Science, 33(11): 147-158. | |
| [25] | 兰洁, 雷相东, 张毓涛, 2019. 天山中部雪岭云杉林多功能权衡与协同关系[J]. 林业科学, 55(11): 9-18. |
| Lan J, Lei X D, Zhang Y T, 2019. Trade-offs and synergies of multiple ecosystem functions in Picea schrenkiana forests in the central Tianshan Mountains[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 55(11): 9-18. | |
| [26] | 强亚琪, 范春雨, 张春雨, 2023. 长白山暗针叶林群落物种多样性维持机制[J]. 生态学报, 43(5): 1884-1891. |
| Qiang Y Q, Fan C Y, Zhang C Y, 2023. Maintenance mechanisms of species diversity in the dark coniferous forest community of Changbai Mountain[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(5): 1884-1891. | |
| [27] |
斯幸峰, 赵郁豪, 陈传武, 等, 2017. Beta多样性分解: 方法、应用与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 25(5): 464-480.
DOI |
|
Si X F, Zhao Y H, Chen C W, et al., 2017. Beta-diversity partitioning: methods, applications and perspectives[J]. Biodiversity Science, 25(5): 464-480.
DOI |
|
| [28] | 王艳红, 李帅锋, 郎学东, 等, 2020. 地形异质性对云南普洱季风常绿阔叶林物种多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 44(10): 1015-1027. |
|
Wang Y H, Li S F, Lang X D, et al., 2020. Effects of topographic heterogeneity on species diversity in a monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest in Pu’er, Yunnan[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 44(10): 1015-1027.
DOI URL |
|
| [29] |
许金石, 柴永福, 刘晓, 等, 2019. 华北区域环境梯度上阔叶林构建模式及分布成因[J]. 植物生态学报, 43(9): 732-741.
DOI |
|
Xu J S, Chai Y F, Liu X, et al., 2019. Community assembly patterns and distribution drivers of broad-leaved forests along environmental gradients in North China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 43(9): 732-741.
DOI URL |
|
| [30] | 钟萍, 王光军, 刘绍华, 等, 2024. 桂北典型岩溶区植物alpha和beta多样性特征及影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 44(7): 3016-3026. |
| Zhong P, Wang G J, Liu S H, et al., 2024. Characteristics and driving factors of plant alpha and beta diversity in a typical karst area of northern Guangxi[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44(7): 3016-3026. | |
| [31] | 邹星晨, 王欣苗, 左亚凡, 等, 2023. 青海云杉不同演替阶段林下草本多样性特征及其环境解释[J]. 生态学报, 43(24): 10285-10294. |
| Zou X C, Wang X M, Zuo Y F, et al., 2023. Understory herbaceous diversity and its environmental interpretation across successional stages of Picea crassifolia forests in Qinghai[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(24): 10285-10294. |
| [1] | WANG Yuxing, WANG Wenying, XIONG Youcai, YANG Fangkun, MA Yanmei. Responses of Soil Total Organic Carbon and Labile Carbon Components to Degradation and Topography of Alpine Grassland [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(6): 831-842. |
| [2] | DENG Pengfei, XIAO Yongyou, ZENG Changjin, GAO Yu, ZHANG Xiulan, CHEN Xingbin, XIAO Fuming, XU Xiaoniu. Characteristics of Community Structure and Species Diversity of a Long-term Abandoned Chinese Fir Plantation Forest [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(4): 511-520. |
| [3] | PAN Yuling, QU Xiangning, LI Qing, WANG Lei, WANG Xiaoping, TAN Peng, CUI Geng, AN Yu, TONG Shouzheng. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Physicochemical Factors and Their Response to Microtopography in a Typical Beach Wetland of the Yellow River in Ningxia [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(4): 668-677. |
| [4] | LIU Xianghong, YIN Qinrui, XIN Jianbao, LIU Wei, XU Xiuquan, HUANG Zhanbin, AN Ruyi. Technology Research Progress and Prospects of Natural Vegetation Restoration and Its Artificial Promotion [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 31(7): 1476-1488. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Website Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Add: 808# Tianyuan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou. 510650.
Institute of Eco-environmental and Soil Sciences, Guangdong Academy of Sciences
Tel/Fax: 020-87024961; E-mail: editor@jeesci.com
Support by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd., E-mail: support@magtech.com.cn