Temporal-Spatial Evolution of Ecosystem Service Value in the “Three-Space” System and Its Driving Factors in Northern Hainan

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2025.08.016

Ecology and Environmental Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 1317-1328.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2025.08.016

• Research Article [Environmental Science] • Previous Articles

Temporal-Spatial Evolution of Ecosystem Service Value in the “Three-Space” System and Its Driving Factors in Northern Hainan

LIN Wei¹^,²^,³(), ZHOU Jinxing⁴, HE Rongxiao¹, CHEN Zongzhu²^,⁵, CHEN Yiqing²^,⁵, WANG Yunlei⁶, ZHONG Yunfang¹^,³^,^*(), LEI Jinrui²^,⁵^,⁷^,^*()

1. Key Laboratory of Biology of Flower Resources of Hainan Province/College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, P. R. China
2. Hainan Academy of Forestry Sciences (Hainan Mangrove Research Institute), Haikou 571100, P. R. China
3. Hainan Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Characteristic Flower and Plant Resources Biology, Haikou 570228, P. R. China
4. College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, P. R. China
5. Hainan Wenchang Forest Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Wenchang 571100, P. R. China
6. Spice and Beverage Research Institute, CATAS, Haikou 571100, P. R. China
7. Haikou Wetland Protection Engineering Technology Research and Development Center, Haikou 571100, P. R. China

Received:2025-01-20 Online:2025-08-18 Published:2025-08-01

琼北地区“三生”空间生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动因素探测

林卫¹^,²^,³(), 周金星⁴, 何荣晓¹, 陈宗铸²^,⁵, 陈毅青²^,⁵, 王韫镭⁶, 钟云芳¹^,³^,^*(), 雷金睿²^,⁵^,⁷^,^*()

1.热带特色林木花卉遗传与种质创新教育部重点实验室/海南大学热带农林学院，海南海口 570228
2.海南省林业科学研究院（海南省红树林研究院），海南海口 571100
3.海南省热带特色花木资源生物学重点实验室，海南海口 570228
4.北京林业大学水土保持学院，北京 100083
5.海南文昌森林生态系统定位观测研究站，海南文昌 571300
6.中国热带农业科学院香料饮料研究所，海南海口 571100
7.海口市湿地保护工程技术研究开发中心，海南海口 571100

通讯作者: *E-mail: kitty@hainanu.edu.cn；Raykingre@163.com
作者简介:林卫（1992年生），男，硕士研究生，主要从事生态系统保护与服务功能评估研究。E-mail: 847212334@qq.com
基金资助:
海南省自然科学基金项目(723QN275);国家自然科学基金项目(32260106)

Abstract

Abstract:

Scientifically assessing ecosystem service value (ESV) and the driving factors of its evolution in the “Three-Space” system is crucial for land spatial planning and conservation purposes. Taking the northern part of Hainan Island as the study area and based on the “Three-Space” classification system, this study employs the equivalent factor method, spatial autocorrelation theory, and geographic detector to explore the temporal-spatial evolution characteristics of the “Three-Space” ESV and its driving factors from 2010 to 2020 in northern Hainan. The results showed that: 1) In 2020, the areas of production, living, and ecological spaces were 2998.93, 404.60, and 4533.96 km², respectively, increasing by 15.36 and 97.04 km² for production and living spaces compared to 2010, respectively, while the ecological space decreased by 111.25 km². The increase in production and living space is mainly due to the conversion of ecological space. 2) The ESV in northern Hainan decreased from 37.827 billion yuan in 2010 to 37.140 billion yuan in 2020, with the ESV of ecological and production spaces decreasing by 0.605 and 0.082 billion yuan, respectively, which were the main contributors to the overall decline in ESV. 3) The ESV in northern Hainan exhibited a significant positive spatial autocorrelation, with clustering becoming increasingly pronounced as time progressed. High-value areas were primarily located in the eastern part of Haikou City, Chengmai County, Wenchang City, and the central part of Ding’an County, and were mainly dominated by ecological space. Low-value areas were found in the eastern part of Chengmai, northern Haikou and Ding’an, and northern Wenchang, which were mainly dominated by production and living spaces. 4) Land use intensity was the dominant factor affecting the spatial heterogeneity of ESV in northern Hainan, with an explanatory power of 71.9% for the interaction between land use intensity and NDVI, which was the primary cause of the spatial differentiation of ESV in northern Hainan.

Key words: production-living-ecological spatial, ecosystem services values, spatial autocorrelation, Geo-Detector, northern Hainan Island

摘要：

科学评估“三生”空间生态系统服务价值（ESV）演变及其驱动因素，对于开展国土空间规划和生态系统保护至关重要。以海南岛北部为研究对象，基于“三生”空间分类系统，运用当量因子法、空间自相关理论和地理探测器，探究2010－2020年海南岛北部“三生”空间ESV时空演变特征及其驱动因素。结果表明，1）2020年，琼北地区生产空间、生活空间和生态空间的面积分别为3.00×10³、405和4.53×10³ km²，较2010年生产空间、生活空间分别增加了15.4、97.0 km²，生态空间减少了111 km²；生产、生活空间增加面积主要来自生态空间转移。2）琼北地区ESV由2010年的378亿元下降至2020年的371亿元，其中，生态、生产空间的ESV分别减少了6.05、0.82亿元，是导致总体ESV降低的主要原因。3）琼北地区ESV在空间分布上具有显著的正向自相关性，且聚集性逐期增强，高值区主要分布在海口市东部、澄迈县、文昌市和定安县中部，以生态空间为主；低值区主要分布在澄迈东部、海口文昌和定安北部，以生产、生活空间为主。4）土地利用程度是影响琼北地区ESV空间异质性的主导因子，其中，土地利用程度和NDVI指数的交互作用解释力为71.9%，是造成海南岛北部ESV空间分异的主要原因。

关键词: “三生”空间, 生态系统服务价值, 空间自相关, 地理探测, 海南岛北部

CLC Number:

X196

LIN Wei, ZHOU Jinxing, HE Rongxiao, CHEN Zongzhu, CHEN Yiqing, WANG Yunlei, ZHONG Yunfang, LEI Jinrui. Temporal-Spatial Evolution of Ecosystem Service Value in the “Three-Space” System and Its Driving Factors in Northern Hainan[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(8): 1317-1328.

林卫, 周金星, 何荣晓, 陈宗铸, 陈毅青, 王韫镭, 钟云芳, 雷金睿. 琼北地区“三生”空间生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动因素探测[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(8): 1317-1328.

Figures/Tables 15

References 40

[1]	COSTANZA R, D’ ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 387(6630): 253-260.
[2]	COSTANZA R, DE GROOT R, SUTTON P, et al., 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services[J]. Global Environmental Change, 26(5): 152-158.
[3]	COSTANZA R, DE GROOT R, BRAAT L, et al., 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?[J]. Ecosystem Services, 28(Part A): 1-16.
[4]	HAN X J, YU J L, SHI L N, et al., 2021. Spatiotemporal evolution of ecosystem service values in an area dominated by vegetation restoration: Quantification and mechanisms[J]. Ecological Indicators, 131: 108191.
[5]	HU J L, QIU S C, LUO N, et al., 2023. Multi-dimensional spatial and temporal variations of ecosystem service values in the Li River Basin, 1990-2020[J]. Remote Sensing, 15(12): 2996.
[6]	HUANG C B, ZHAO D Y, LIU C, et al., 2023. Integrating territorial pattern and socioeconomic development into ecosystem service value assessment[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 100: 107088.
[7]	NIU J J, MAO C M, XIANG J, 2024. Based on ecological footprint and ecosystem service value, research on ecological compensation in Anhui Province, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 158: 111341.
[8]	PAN N H, GUAN Q Y, WANG Q Z, et al., 2021. Spatial differentiation and driving mechanisms in ecosystem service value of arid region: A case study in the middle and lower reaches of Shule River Basin, NW China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319: 128718.
[9]	QUAN L A, JIN S G, CHEN J Y, et al., 2024. Evolution and driving forces of ecological service value in Anhui based on Landsat land use and land cover change[J]. Remote Sensing, 16(2): 269.
[10]	ROY S K, ALAM M T, MOJUMDER P, et al., 2024. Dynamic assessment and prediction of land use alterations influence on ecosystem service value: A pathway to environmental sustainability[J]. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 21: 100319.
[11]	TALUKDAR S, SINGHA P, SHAHFAHAD, et al., 2020. Dynamics of ecosystem services (ESs) in response to land use land cover (LU/LC) changes in the lower Gangetic plain of India[J]. Ecological Indicators, 112: 106121.
[12]	WANG A Y, LIAO X Y, TONG Z J, et al., 2022. Spatial-temporal dynamic evaluation of the ecosystem service value from the perspective of “production-living-ecological” spaces: A case study in Dongliao River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 333: 130218.
[13]	ZHANG L L, HU B Q, ZHANG Z, et al., 2023. Research on the spatiotemporal evolution and mechanism of ecosystem service value in the mountain-river-sea transition zone based on “production-living-ecological space”: Taking the Karst-Beibu Gulf in Southwest Guangxi, China as an example[J]. Ecological Indicators, 148: 109889.
[14]	ZHU J H, SHANG Z Y, LONG C, et al., 2023. Functional measurements, pattern evolution, and coupling characteristics of “production-living-ecological space” in the Yangtze Delta Region[J]. Sustainability, 15(24): 16712.
[15]	董悦, 付梅臣, 陈乃鸽, 等, 2022. 近30年唐山市生态服务价值空间分异及地理探测研究[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 39(6): 1196-1207.
	DONG Y, FU M C, CHEN N G, et al., 2022. Spatial differentiation of ecosystem service values in Tangshan City over the past 30 years using geographic detection[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 39(6): 1196-1207.
[16]	国土资源部, 2017. 土地利用现状分类: GB/T 21010—2017[S]. 北京: 中国国家标准化委员会: 5-9.
	Ministry of Land and Resources, 2017. Classification of land use status: GB/T 21010—2017[S]. Beijing: China National Committee for Standardization: 5-9.
[17]	高星, 刘泽伟, 李晨曦, 等, 2020. 基于 “三生空间” 的雄安新区土地利用功能转型与生态环境效应研究[J]. 生态学报, 40(20): 7113-7122.
	GAO X, LIU Z W, LI C X, et al., 2020. Land use function transformation in the Xiong’an New Area based on ecological-production-living spaces and associated eco-environment effects[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(20): 7113-7122.
[18]	国家统计局, 2021. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社.
	National Bureau of Statistics, 2021. China Statistical Yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House.
[19]	黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇, 2017. 面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 36(3): 378-391. DOI
	HUANG J C, LIN H X, QI X X, 2017. A literature review on optimization of spatial development pattern based on ecological-production-living space[J]. Progress in Geography, 36(3): 378-391. DOI
[20]	侯鹏, 翟俊, 曹巍, 等, 2018. 国家重点生态功能区生态状况变化与保护成效评估——以海南岛中部山区国家重点生态功能区为例[J]. 地理学报, 73(3): 429-441. DOI
	HOU P, ZHAI J, CAO W, et al., 2018. Evaluation on ecosystem changes and protection of the national key ecological function zones in mountainous areas of central Hainan Island[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(3): 429-441. DOI
[21]	海南省统计局, 2021. 海南统计年鉴2020[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社.
	Hainan Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 2021. Hainan statistical yearbook 2020[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
[22]	刘阳, 2015. 海南经济特区海岸带土地利用空间的功能分区及利用对策[J]. 贵州农业科学, 43(12): 182-185.
	LIU Y, 2015. Spatial function division of coastal land utilization and its utilization strategy in Hainan special economic zone[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 43(12): 182-185.
[23]	雷金睿, 陈宗铸, 吴庭天, 等, 2019. 海南岛东北部土地利用与生态系统服务价值空间自相关格局分析[J]. 生态学报, 39(7): 2366-2377.
	LEI J R, CHEN Z Z, WU T T, et al., 2019. Spatial autocorrelation pattern analysis of land use and the value of ecosystem services in northeast Hainan Island[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(7): 2366-2377.
[24]	雷金睿, 陈宗铸, 陈小花, 等, 2020. 1980-2018年海南岛土地利用与生态系统服务价值时空变化[J]. 生态学报, 40(14): 4760-4773.
	LEI J R, CHEN Z Z, CHEN X H, et al., 2020. Spatio-temporal changes of land use and ecosystem services value in Hainan Island from 1980 to 2018[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(14): 4760-4773.
[25]	李晨欣, 陈松林, 李晶, 等, 2022. 基于 “三生” 空间的土地利用冲突时空演变特征研究——以厦门、漳州和泉州城市群为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 42(3): 247-254, 262.
	LI C X, CHEN S L, LI J, et al., 2022. Evolution of spatio-temporal characteristics of land use conflict based on productional-living-ecological space: A case study at Xiamen-Zhangzhou-Quanzhou Urban agglomeration[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 42(3): 247-254, 262.
[26]	李凯, 侯鹰, 付奇, 等, 2023. 都市圈 “三生空间” 协同变化及其对生态系统服务的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 30(3): 430-439.
	LI K, HOU Y, FU Q, et al., 2023. Synergistic changes of production-living-ecology spaces and their influences on ecosystem services in the metropolitan area[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 30(3): 430-439.
[27]	李源, 李发祥, 梁金水, 等, 2023. 滨海城市土地利用变化对陆地生态系统服务价值与储碳的影响——以辽宁省大连市为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 43(5): 330-342.
	LI Y, LI F X, LIANG J S, et al., 2023. Effects of land use change on terrestrial ecosystem service value and carbon storage: A case study in Dalian City, Liaoning Province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 43(5): 330-342.
[28]	李荣杰, 李惠梅, 武非非, 等, 2024. 青海湖流域生态系统服务空间分异规律及驱动力研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 33(2): 301-309. DOI
	LI R J, LI H M, WU F F, et al., 2024. Study on the spatial differentiation pattern and driving force of ecosystem services in Qinghai Lake Basin[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 33(2): 301-309.
[29]	刘敬杰, 张富申, 周林波, 等, 2024. 基于 “三生” 空间的天长市土地利用时空格局及驱动因素分析[J]. 黑龙江工程学院学报, 38(1): 30-37.
	LIU J J, ZHANG F S, ZHOU L B, et al., 2024. Analysis of spatial-temporal pattern and driving factors of land use in Tianchang based on “production-life-ecology” space[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Institute of Technology, 38(1): 30-37.
[30]	林晨宇, 宋羽, 叶玲兰, 2024. 福建省生态系统服务价值时空演变及驱动因素[J]. 自然保护地, 4(2): 81-94.
	LIN C Y, SONG Y, YE L L, et al., 2024. Spatiotemporal evolution and its driving factors of ecosystem service value in Fujian Province[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 4(2): 81-94.
[31]	马超群, 弋志强, 员学锋, 等, 2025. 不同格网尺度下生态系统服务价值空间分异及影响因素分析——以秦岭西安段为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 32(1): 389-399.
	MA C Q, YI Z Q, YUAN X F, et al., 2025. Spatial difference of ecological services and its influencing factors under different scales-Taking the Xi’an section of Qinling Mountains as an example[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 32(1): 389-399.
[32]	王劲峰, 徐成东, 2017. 地理探测器: 原理与展望[J]. 地理学报, 72(1): 116-134. DOI
	WANG J F, XU C D, 2017. Geodetector: Principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(1): 116-134. DOI
[33]	王波, 杨太保, 2021. 1980-2018年银川市生态系统服务价值评价及驱动力分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 44(2): 552-564. DOI
	WANG B, YANG T B, 2021. Value evaluation and driving force analysis of ecosystem services in Yinchuan City from 1980 to 2018[J]. Arid Land Geography, 44(2): 552-564. DOI
[34]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等, 2015b. 中国生态系统服务的价值[J]. 资源科学, 37(9): 1740-1746.
	XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG C S, et al., 2015b. The value of ecosystem services in China[J]. Resources Science, 37(9): 1740-1746.
[35]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等, 2015a. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 30(8): 1243-1254.
	XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG L M, et al., 2015a. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on Per Unit Area[J]. Chinese Journal of Natural Resources, 30(8): 1243-1254.
[36]	徐乙文, 戴文远, 黄万里, 等, 2021. 福州中心城区生态服务价值与景观生态风险时空变化及相关性分析[J]. 生态科学, 40(4): 92-101.
	XU Y W, DAI W Y, HUANG W L, et al., 2021. Spatiotemporal evolution and correlation analysis of ecosystem service values and ecological risk in Fuzhou central city[J]. Ecological Science, 40(4): 92-101.
[37]	庄大方, 刘纪远, 1997. 中国土地利用程度的区域分异模型研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 12(2): 10-16.
	ZHUANG D F, LIU J Y, 1997. Study on the model of regional differentiation of land use degree in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 12(2): 10-16.
[38]	赵军, 杨凯, 2007. 生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 27(1): 346-356.
	ZHAO J, YANG K, 2007. Valuation of ecosystem services: Characteristics, issues and prospects[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(1): 346-356.
[39]	张箫, 牟雪洁, 王夏晖, 等, 2021. 国土空间生态修复分区研究——以海南岛为例[J]. 生态经济, 37(2): 183-189.
	ZHANG X, MOU X J, WANG X H, et al., 2021. Study on the ecological restoration zoning of territorial space: Taking Hainan Island as an example[J]. Ecological Economy, 37(2): 183-189.
[40]	郑晓豪, 陈颖彪, 郑子豪, 等, 2023. 湖北省生态系统服务价值动态变化及其影响因素演变[J]. 生态环境学报, 32(1): 195-206. DOI
	ZHENG X H, CHEN Y B, ZHENG Z H, et al., 2023. Dynamic changes of ecosystem service value and evolution of its influencing factors in Hubei Province[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 32(1): 195-206.

数据类型	数据来源及预处理
土地利用矢量数据	来源于资源环境科学与数据平台（https://www.resde.cn）
粮食作物数据	来源于2010－2020年的《中国统计年鉴》（国家统计局，2021）和《海南统计年鉴》（海南省统计局，2021），包括中国和海南岛北部（海口、澄迈、文昌、定安）粮食作物播种面积和产量数据
高程数据	来源于地理空间数据云（https://www.gscloud.cn/），高程数据为ASTER GDEM，空间分辨率为30 m；坡度数据利用ArcGIS 10.8.1栅格表面分析工具从高程数据中提取
社会经济数据	来源于资源环境科学与数据平台（https://www.resde.cn），包括人均GDP、人口密度，空间分辨率为1 km
气象数据	来源于地球资源数据云（http://gis5g.com/home），包括年均气温、年均降雨量，空间分辨率为1 km
植被数据	来源于地球资源数据（http://gis5g.com/home），归一化植被指数（NDVI），空间分辨率为1 km
土壤类型	来源于资源环境科学与数据平台（https://www.resde.cn），空间分辨率为1 km
灯光数据	来源于地球资源数据云（http://gis5g.com/home），夜间灯光指数，空间分辨率为1 km
交通数据	来源于地球资源数据（http://gis5g.com/home），城市一级道路，空间分辨率为1 km，并使用ArcGIS 10.8.1软件中距离分析工具从城市一级道路数据中提取距离城市一级道路距离数据

数据类型	数据来源及预处理
土地利用矢量数据	来源于资源环境科学与数据平台（https://www.resde.cn）
粮食作物数据	来源于2010－2020年的《中国统计年鉴》（国家统计局，2021）和《海南统计年鉴》（海南省统计局，2021），包括中国和海南岛北部（海口、澄迈、文昌、定安）粮食作物播种面积和产量数据
高程数据	来源于地理空间数据云（https://www.gscloud.cn/），高程数据为ASTER GDEM，空间分辨率为30 m；坡度数据利用ArcGIS 10.8.1栅格表面分析工具从高程数据中提取
社会经济数据	来源于资源环境科学与数据平台（https://www.resde.cn），包括人均GDP、人口密度，空间分辨率为1 km
气象数据	来源于地球资源数据云（http://gis5g.com/home），包括年均气温、年均降雨量，空间分辨率为1 km
植被数据	来源于地球资源数据（http://gis5g.com/home），归一化植被指数（NDVI），空间分辨率为1 km
土壤类型	来源于资源环境科学与数据平台（https://www.resde.cn），空间分辨率为1 km
灯光数据	来源于地球资源数据云（http://gis5g.com/home），夜间灯光指数，空间分辨率为1 km
交通数据	来源于地球资源数据（http://gis5g.com/home），城市一级道路，空间分辨率为1 km，并使用ArcGIS 10.8.1软件中距离分析工具从城市一级道路数据中提取距离城市一级道路距离数据

土地利用功能分类		土地利用现状分类二级类型
一级地类	二级地类	土地利用现状分类二级类型
生产空间	农业生产用地	水田、旱地
	工矿生产用地	其他建设用地
生活空间	城乡生活用地	城镇用地、农村居民点
生态空间	林地生态用地	有林地、灌木林、疏林地、其他林地
	草地生态用地	高覆盖度草地、中覆盖度草地、低覆盖度草地
	水域生态用地	河渠、水库坑塘、滩涂、滩地、海洋
	其他生态用地	沙地、沼泽地

土地利用功能分类		土地利用现状分类二级类型
一级地类	二级地类	土地利用现状分类二级类型
生产空间	农业生产用地	水田、旱地
	工矿生产用地	其他建设用地
生活空间	城乡生活用地	城镇用地、农村居民点
生态空间	林地生态用地	有林地、灌木林、疏林地、其他林地
	草地生态用地	高覆盖度草地、中覆盖度草地、低覆盖度草地
	水域生态用地	河渠、水库坑塘、滩涂、滩地、海洋
	其他生态用地	沙地、沼泽地

生态系统服务类型		生产空间		生活空间	生态空间
生态系统服务类型		农业生产用地	工矿生产用地	城乡生活用地	林地生态用地	草地生态用地	水域生态用地	其他生态用地
供给服务	食物生产	1.03	0	0	0.26	0.18	0.66	0.01
	原料生产	0.29	0	0	0.6	0.26	0.37	0.03
	水资源供给	−0.91	0	0	0.31	0.15	5.44	0.02
调节服务	气体调节	0.82	0.02	0	1.98	0.93	1.34	0.11
	气候调节	0.43	0	0	5.92	2.46	2.95	0.1
	净化环境	0.12	0.1	0	1.73	0.81	4.58	0.31
	水文调节	1.13	0.03	0	3.87	1.81	63.24	0.21
支持服务	土壤保持	0.67	0.02	0	2.41	1.14	1.62	0.13
	维持养分循环	0.14	0	0	0.18	0.09	0.13	0.01
	生物多样性	0.16	0.02	0	2.19	1.03	5.21	0.12
文化服务	美学景观	0.07	0.01	0	0.96	0.46	3.31	0.05

Temporal-Spatial Evolution of Ecosystem Service Value in the “Three-Space” System and Its Driving Factors in Northern Hainan

琼北地区“三生”空间生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动因素探测

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 15

References 40

Related Articles 10

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

空间类型	ESV/10⁸元			2010－2015	2015－2020	2010－2020
空间类型	2010	2015	2020	ESV变化/10⁸元	ESV变化/10⁸元	ESV变化/10⁸元	变化率/%
生产空间	33.24	32.67	32.43	−0.57	−0.25	−0.82	−2.45
生活空间	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
生态空间	345.03	340.08	338.98	−4.95	−1.10	−6.05	−1.75
总计	378.27	372.75	371.40	−5.52	−1.35	−6.87	−1.82

土地利用功能转型模式	ESV变化/10⁸元	贡献率/%
生产空间→生产空间	−0.39	2.24
生产空间→生活空间	−0.51	2.93
生产空间→生态空间	3.57	20.65
生活空间→生产空间	0.00	0.01
生活空间→生态空间	0.22	1.29
生态空间→生产空间	−7.61	43.99
生态空间→生活空间	−3.58	20.71
生态空间→生态空间	1.42	8.19
总计	−6.87	100.00

[1]	SHI Rongrui, YANG Xiaoxiong, MA Ji, HUANG Shanshan, YANG Yue, LU Shengquan, WU Guang. Analysis of the Temporal and Spatial Evolution of Ecological Environment Quality and Its Driving Forces in the Yunnan-Guangxi-Guizhou Rocky Desertification Area [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(7): 1147-1162.
[2]	YU Qianru, PEI Sha, LIU Chunlan, QIAO Qing, ZHENG Fangyu, ZHU Linhong. Research on Assessing the Ecosystem Regulating Service Scarcity and Spatial Aggregation Characteristics in Beijing Based on a Multi-Dimensional Perspective [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(7): 1133-1146.
[3]	ZHAO Zhixuan, WEI Fangfei, WU Haotian, WANG Yining, WANG Pengzhe. The Response of Ecological Service Value to Land Use Change in Lancang-Mekong River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(5): 688-698.
[4]	ZHANG Shuhan, JIANG Hailing, YU Hailin, FENG Xinhui. Spatio-temporal Evolution and Driving Force Analysis of Landscape Ecological Risk in Shenyang Modern Metropolitan [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(9): 1471-1481.
[5]	LIAO Hongsheng, WEI Wei, SHI Yu. Characteristics of Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Soil Erosion in Typical Watersheds in Loess Hilly Areas and Its Driving Mechanisms: A Case Study of Zuli River [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(6): 908-918.
[6]	GENG Yani, WU Tao, JIANG Peizhao, ZHANG Tengfei. Coupling Relationship between New Urbanization and Ecological Environment in Shaanxi Province and Scenario Prediction [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(12): 1874-1881.
[7]	LIU Xia, GUO Shu, WANG Lin. Study on the Value of Land Use and Ecological Services in the Region of Regional Integration: Take Shuanglai Pilot Area as An Example [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(6): 1163-1172.
[8]	LI Jianhui, DANG Zheng, CHEN Lin. Spatial-temporal Characteristics of PM_2.5 and Its Influencing Factors in the Yellow River Jiziwan Metropolitan Area [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(4): 697-705.
[9]	WANG Jiali, FENG Jingke, YANG Yuanzheng, ZU Jiaxing, CAI Wenhua, YANG Jian. Research on Spatial Relations between Impervious Surfaces and the Urban Thermal Environment in the Central Metropolitan Area of Nanning City [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(3): 525-534.
[10]	YE Shen, WANG Peng, HUANG Yi, SHE Yuanyang, DING Mingjun. Urban Morphology and the Influence of the Spatial Heterogeneity of PM_2.5 and O₃ Pollution: The Case of the Yangtze River Delta [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(10): 1771-1784.