Research on Assessing the Ecosystem Regulating Service Scarcity and Spatial Aggregation Characteristics in Beijing Based on a Multi-Dimensional Perspective

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2025.07.013

Ecology and Environmental Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 1133-1146.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2025.07.013

• Research Article [Environmental Science] • Previous Articles Next Articles

Research on Assessing the Ecosystem Regulating Service Scarcity and Spatial Aggregation Characteristics in Beijing Based on a Multi-Dimensional Perspective

YU Qianru(), PEI Sha, LIU Chunlan(), QIAO Qing, ZHENG Fangyu, ZHU Linhong

Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Eco-Environment Protection, Beijing 100037, P. R. China

Received:2024-12-21 Online:2025-07-18 Published:2025-07-11

基于多维视角的北京市生态系统调节服务稀缺性评估及其空间聚集特征研究

于倩茹(), 裴厦, 刘春兰(), 乔青, 郑方钰, 朱林红

北京市生态环境保护科学研究院，北京 100037

通讯作者: *E-mail: liuchunlan@cee.cn
作者简介:于倩茹（1996年生），女（蒙古族），硕士，主要研究方向为生态系统服务评估。E-mail: yuqr1996@163.com
基金资助:
北京市生态环境保护科学研究院基金项目(Y2025-009);北京市生态环境保护科学研究院基金项目(Y2025-008);北京市生态环境保护科学研究院基金项目(Y2025-010);国家自然科学基金项目(41801186)

Abstract

Abstract:

Scarcity is an essential prerequisite for the generation of ecosystem regulating service value, and assessing ecosystem regulating service scarcity (ERSS) is of great significance for achieving reasonable pricing of ecosystem regulating services. Existing studies have conducted relatively few discussions on the ERSS, with a lack of quantitative assessment. Therefore, this study constructed a comprehensive assessment framework for ERSS based on the theory of scarcity from four dimensions: ecosystem health, supply of ecosystem regulating services, demand for ecosystem regulating services, and alternative situations of ecosystem regulating services. Using Beijing as an example, this study revealed the spatial aggregation characteristics of ERSS at different spatial scales and explored the spatial heterogeneity of ERSS using spatial autocorrelation analysis. The results indicated that 1) the high value of ERSS was mainly concentrated in the central urban areas with a developed socio-economy and dense population, while low-value areas were mainly concentrated in the ecological conservation areas, where both ecosystem health grade and the supply of ecosystem regulating services were considerably high. 2) There was a significant positive spatial correlation between the ERSS. The spatial aggregation patterns were mainly of the high-high and low-low types, with the high-high type mainly distributed in the central urban area. 3) A clear spatial-scale effect on ERSS was observed. The spatial distribution of ERSS was significantly different at the grid scale, and with an increase in spatial scale, the spatial heterogeneity of scarcity weakened. It is suggested that when pricing ecosystem-regulating services in the future, the scarcity adjustment coefficient should be considered to modify the current valuation system to objectively reflect the ecosystem-regulating service value. The research findings contribute to enhancing the technology system for accounting for ecosystem regulating service value and provide a scientific basis for the refined management of regional ecosystems and ecological compensation.

Key words: ecosystem regulating service, scarcity, spatial heterogeneity, scale effect, spatial autocorrelation analysis, Beijing

摘要：

稀缺性是生态系统调节服务价值产生的必要条件，评估生态系统调节服务稀缺性有助于实现生态系统调节服务合理定价。既有的研究对生态系统调节服务稀缺性的探讨较少，定量评估匮乏。为此，基于稀缺性理论构建了生态系统调节服务稀缺性综合评估框架，涵盖生态系统健康、生态系统调节服务供给、生态系统调节服务需求和生态系统调节服务替代状况等4个维度。以超大城市北京市为例，揭示了不同空间尺度下北京市生态系统调节服务稀缺性的空间聚集特征，并利用空间自相关方法分析了空间异质性。结果表明，1）北京市生态系统调节服务高稀缺性区域主要集中在社会经济发达，人口密集的中心城区；低稀缺性区域则集中在生态系统健康等级高、调节服务供给高的生态涵养区。2）生态系统调节服务稀缺性存在显著的空间正相关，空间聚集格局主要以高-高型和低-低型为主，高-高型主要分布在中心城区。3）生态系统调节服务稀缺性具有空间尺度效应，在网格尺度上空间分布差异明显，随着尺度的增大空间异质性减弱。建议未来对生态系统调节服务定价时应考虑构建稀缺性调整系数，以修正现行价值评估体系，从而客观地反映生态系统调节服务的价值。该文提出的评估框架有助于完善生态系统调节服务价值核算的技术体系，为区域生态系统精细化管理和生态补偿提供科学依据。

关键词: 生态系统调节服务, 稀缺性, 空间异质性, 尺度效应, 空间自相关, 北京市

CLC Number:

X171.1
X826

YU Qianru, PEI Sha, LIU Chunlan, QIAO Qing, ZHENG Fangyu, ZHU Linhong. Research on Assessing the Ecosystem Regulating Service Scarcity and Spatial Aggregation Characteristics in Beijing Based on a Multi-Dimensional Perspective[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(7): 1133-1146.

于倩茹, 裴厦, 刘春兰, 乔青, 郑方钰, 朱林红. 基于多维视角的北京市生态系统调节服务稀缺性评估及其空间聚集特征研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(7): 1133-1146.

Figures/Tables 8

References 70

[1]	BATABYAL A A, KAHN J R, O'NEILL R V, 2003. On the scarcity value of ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(2): 334-352.
[2]	BERTHOLD A, COLOGNA V, SIEGRIST M, 2022. The influence of scarcity perception on people’s pro-environmental behavior and their readiness to accept new sustainable technologies[J]. Ecological Economics, 196: 107399.
[3]	BRYAN B A, YE Y, ZHANG J E, et al., 2018. Land-use change impacts on ecosystem services value: Incorporating the scarcity effects of supply and demand dynamics[J]. Ecosystem Services, 32(Part A): 144-157.
[4]	CHEN Y R, QIAO X N, YANG Y J, et al., 2024. Identifying the spatial relationships and drivers of ecosystem service supply-demand matching: A case of Yiluo River Basin[J]. Ecological Indicators, 163: 112122.
[5]	DAOUD A, 2018. Unifying studies of scarcity, abundance, and sufficiency[J]. Ecological Economics, 147: 208-217.
[6]	DRUPP M A, HÄNSEL M C, FENICHEL E P, et al., 2024. Accounting for the increasing benefits from scarce ecosystems[J]. Science, 383(6687): 1062-1064. DOI PMID
[7]	FAN S X, YAN M, YU L F, et al., 2024. Integrating ecosystem service supply-demand and ecological risk assessment for urban planning: A case study in Beijing, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 161: 111950.
[8]	GOLLIER C, 2019. Valuation of natural capital under uncertain substitutability[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 94: 54-66.
[9]	GUAN S, GAO Y M, DONG Z F, 2024. Assessing the dynamics of ecosystem service value in China: A perspective on equality and efficiency[J]. Ecological Indicators, 165: 112176.
[10]	HAUSMANN A, CORTÉS-CAPANO G, DI MININ E, 2023. Exploring the effects of market scarcity on consumers’ demand for rarity in the wildlife trade[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 48: e02744.
[11]	HE W, WANG H M, LIU G, et al., 2025. Can ecosystem services supply match local residents' perception: Linking macro-ESs and micro-individual perceptions in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 374: 124116.
[12]	JIANG S M, FENG F, ZHANG X N, et al., 2024. Ecological transformation is the key to improve ecosystem health for resource-exhausted cities: A case study in China based on future development scenarios[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 921: 171147.
[13]	KANG Y, CHENG C X, LIU X H, et al., 2019. An ecosystem services value assessment of land-use change in Chengdu: Based on a modification of scarcity factor[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 110: 157-167.
[14]	LANGEMEYER J, BENRA F, NAHUELHUAL L, et al., 2024. Ecosystem services justice: The emergence of a critical research field[J]. Ecosystem Services, 69: 101655.
[15]	LI W J, KANG J W, WANG Y, 2023. Distinguishing the relative contributions of landscape composition and configuration change on ecosystem health from a geospatial perspective[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 894: 165002.
[16]	LIAO R D, 2024. Water scarcity assessment index from the realistic perspective of human basic water requirements[J]. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 22: 100404.
[17]	PAN Z Z, HE J H, LIU D F, et al., 2020. Predicting the joint effects of future climate and land use change on ecosystem health in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China[J]. Applied Geography, 124: 102293.
[18]	PENG J, LIU Y X, LI T Y, et al., 2017. Regional ecosystem health response to rural land use change: A case study in Lijiang City, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 72: 399-410.
[19]	PENG J, LIU Y X, WU J S, et al., 2015. Linking ecosystem services and landscape patterns to assess urban ecosystem health: A case study in Shenzhen City, China[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 143: 56-68.
[20]	QU H J, YOU C, WANG W Y, et al., 2024. Spatio-temporal interplay between ecosystem services and urbanization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: A new perspective for considering the scarcity effect[J]. Land Use Policy, 147: 107358.
[21]	RAN P L, FRAZIER A E, XIA C, et al., 2023. How does urban landscape pattern affect ecosystem health? Insights from a spatiotemporal analysis of 212 major cities in China[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 99: 104963.
[22]	SHI Y, FENG C C, YU Q R, et al., 2021. Integrating supply and demand factors for estimating ecosystem services scarcity value and its response to urbanization in typical mountainous and hilly regions of south China[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 796: 149032.
[23]	SONG X J, CHEN F, SUN Y, et al., 2024. Effects of land utilization transformation on ecosystem services in urban agglomeration on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 162: 112046.
[24]	WANG W L, XU J, LUAN X F, et al., 2024a. Wetland ecosystem service values in Beijing significantly increased from 1984 to 2020: Trend changes, type evolution, and driving factor[J]. Ecological Indicators, 166: 112235.
[25]	WANG J H, WANG B, HUANG X K, et al., 2024b. Evaluating flows of recreational ecosystem services using mobile phone data: A demonstration in the megacity of Beijing[J]. Applied Geography, 168: 103313.
[26]	WEI L Y, MAO M J, ZHAO Y X, et al., 2024. Spatio-temporal characteristics and multi-scenario simulation analysis of ecosystem service value in coastal wetland: A case study of the coastal zone of Hainan Island, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 368: 122199.
[27]	WU J S, CHENG D J, XU Y Y, et al., 2021. Spatial-temporal change of ecosystem health across China: Urbanization impact perspective[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 326: 129393.
[28]	YAN S W, CHEN H, QUAN Q, et al., 2023. Evolution and coupled matching of ecosystem service supply and demand at different spatial scales in the Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 155: 111052.
[29]	YANG Y, YUAN X F, AN J J, et al., 2024. Drivers of ecosystem services and their trade-offs and synergies in different land use policy zones of Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 452: 142077.
[30]	YANG Y, ZHANG Y Y, YANG H, et al., 2022. Horizontal ecological compensation as a tool for sustainable development of urban agglomerations: Exploration of the realization mechanism of Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration in China[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 137: 301-313.
[31]	YUAN Y J, CHEN D X, WU S H, et al., 2019. Urban sprawl decreases the value of ecosystem services and intensifies the supply scarcity of ecosystem services in China[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 697: 134170.
[32]	ZHOU X P, YANG L, GU X K, et al., 2022. Scarcity value assessment of ecosystem services based on changes in supply and demand: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta City Cluster, China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19): 11999.
[33]	安晓明, 2004. 自然资源价值及其补偿问题研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学.
	AN X M, 2004. Study on the value compensation of natural resources[D]. Changchun: Jilin University.
[34]	北京市农村经济研究中心, 2016. 2015北京市农村经济发展报告[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社.
	Beijing Municipal Research Centre for Rural Economy, 2016. 2015 Beijing Rural Economic Development Report[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press.
[35]	北京市统计局, 2021. 北京统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社.
	Beijing Bureau of Statistics, 2021. Beijing Statistical Yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
[36]	陈德敏, 李世龙, 何凯, 2005. 循环经济理念下的资源稀缺性探讨[J]. 生态经济 (7): 53-55.
	CHEN D M, LI S L, HE K, 2005. Discussion of the resource rareness under the idea of recycle economy[J]. Ecological Economy (7): 53-55.
[37]	陈卓, 张耀宇, 康庆, 等, 2023. 中国市域建设用地资源稀缺与土地利用效率互动关系变迁的实证研究[J]. 经济地理, 43(11): 68-78. DOI
	CHEN Z, ZHANG Y Y, KANG Q, et al., 2023. Interaction relationships between the scarcity of construction land resources and the land use efficiency in China at the municipal level[J]. Economic Geography, 43(11): 68-78. DOI
[38]	邓丽明, 杨骥, 尹小玲, 等, 2024. 粤港澳大湾区生态系统服务供需关系及其对城市化多空间尺度的响应[J]. 生态学报, 44(20): 9094-9107.
	DENG L M, YANG J, YIN X L, et al., 2024. Supply and demand of ecosystem services and its multi-spatial scale response to urbanization in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44(20): 9094-9107.
[39]	翟天林, 2023. 多尺度生态系统服务供需格局演变与管控研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学.
	ZHAI T L, 2023. Study on the evolution and management of multi-scale ecosystem services supply-demand pattern[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University.
[40]	高明惠, 李成, 赵虎, 2023. 江苏省生态系统服务供需格局与影响因素[J]. 水土保持研究, 30(5): 315-324.
	GAO M H, LI C, ZHAO H, 2023. Spatiotemporal pattern of supply-demand of ecosystem services and influencing factors in Jiangsu Province[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 30(5): 315-324.
[41]	高鑫源, 2023. 区域水资源资本定价模型构建及实证研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学.
	GAO X Y, 2023. Construction of regional water resources capital pricing model and empirical research[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology.
[42]	高阳, 沈振, 张中浩, 等, 2024. 生态系统服务视角下的社会-生态系统耦合模拟研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 79(1): 134-146. DOI
	GAO Y, SHEN Z, ZHANG Z H, et al., 2024. Advance in simulation of social-ecological system coupling under the perspective of ecosystem services[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 79(1): 134-146. DOI
[43]	国家统计局, 生态环境部, 2021. 中国环境统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社.
	National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, 2021. China statistical yearbook on environment[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
[44]	李双成, 郑度, 张镱锂, 2002. 环境与生态系统资本价值评估的区域范式[J]. 地理科学, 22(3): 270-275.
	LI S C, ZHENG D, ZHANG Y L, 2002. Regional evaluating paradigm for ecological services of environment and ecosystems[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 22(3): 270-275. DOI
[45]	李宇亮, 陈克亮, 2021. 生态产品价值形成过程和分类实现途径探析[J]. 生态经济, 37(8): 157-162.
	LI Y L, CHEN K L, 2021. An analysis on the formation process and various realization approaches of ecological product value[J]. Ecological Economy, 37(8): 157-162.
[46]	刘丽萍, 唐德善, 2014. 水资源短缺与社会适应能力评价及耦合协调关系分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 28(6): 13-19.
	LIU L P, TANG D S, 2014. Evaluation and coupling coordination analysis on water resources scarcity and social adaptation capacity[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 28(6): 13-19.
[47]	刘平养, 2008. 自然资本的替代性研究[D]. 上海: 复旦大学.
	LIU P Y, 2008. Research on the substitutability of natural capital[D]. Shanghai: Fudan University.
[48]	刘香华, 王秀明, 刘谞承, 等, 2022. 基于外溢生态系统服务价值的广东省生态补偿机制研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 31(5): 1024-1031. DOI
	LIU X H, WANG X M, LIU X C, et al., 2022. Ecological compensation mechanism study of Guangdong Province based on spilled ecosystem service value[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 31(5): 1024-1031.
[49]	陆中桂, 康哲, 李巍, 等, 2024. 水量-水质-生态需水综合视角下黄河流域水稀缺评估[J]. 水资源保护, 40(4): 73-81.
	LU Z G, KANG Z, LI W, et al., 2024. Water scarcity assessment in the Yellow River Basin from comprehensive perspective of water quantity- water quality-ecology water demand[J]. Water Resources Protection, 40(4): 73-81.
[50]	马元博, 翟天林, 毕庆生, 等, 2024. 基于需求层次理论和生态系统服务供需的黄河流域生态管理分区[J]. 生态学报, 44(15): 6513-6526.
	MA Y B, ZHAI T L, BI Q S, et al., 2024. Ecological management zoning in the Yellow River Basin based on hierarchy of needs theory and ecosystem services supply and demand[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44(15): 6513-6526.
[51]	欧阳志云, 朱春全, 杨广斌, 等, 2013. 生态系统生产总值核算: 概念、核算方法与案例研究[J]. 生态学报, 33(21): 6747-6761.
	OUYANG Z Y, ZHU C Q, YANG G B, et al., 2013. Gross ecosystem product: Concept, accounting framework and case study[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(21): 6747-6761.
[52]	裴厦, 于倩茹, 刘春兰, 等, 2025. 北京市生态系统调节服务稀缺性演变特征及驱动因素分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 38(1): 111-124.
	PEI S, YU Q R, LIU C L, et al., 2025. Evolutionary characteristics and driving factors of the scarcity of urban ecosystem regulating services of Beijing[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 38(1): 111-124.
[53]	彭建, 杨旸, 谢盼, 等, 2017. 基于生态系统服务供需的广东省绿地生态网络建设分区[J]. 生态学报, 37(13): 4562-4572.
	PENG J, YANG Y, XIE P, et al., 2017. Zoning for the construction of green space ecological networks in Guangdong Province based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(13): 4562-4572.
[54]	芮建伟, 韩奎, 2002. 不可再生资源稀缺性研究的意义、现状与问题[J]. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 12(1): 38-42.
	RUI J W, HAN K, 2002. Review of the study on non-renewable resources scarcity: Implication current situation and problems[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 12(1): 38-42.
[55]	陶德凯, 张子建, 周文莉, 等, 2024. 基于外部效益内部化的生态产品价值实现理论框架[J]. 生态学报, 44(16): 7006-7019.
	TAO D K, ZHANG Z J, ZHOU W L, et al., 2024. Theoretical framework of ecological product value realization based on the internalization of external benefit theory[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44(16): 7006-7019.
[56]	童绍玉, 周振宇, 彭海英, 2016. 中国水资源短缺的空间格局及缺水类型[J]. 生态经济, 32(7): 168-173.
	TONG S Y, ZHOU Z Y, PENG H Y, 2016. Spatial pattern of scarcity of water and it’s shortage types in China[J]. Ecological Economy, 32(7): 168-173.
[57]	王殿常, 李玮, 谢向向, 等, 2024. 供需视角下生态产品价值实现路径研究[J]. 中国水利 (10): 57-62.
	WANG D C, LI W, XIE X X, et al., 2024. Research on the typical pathways for the realization of ecological product value from the perspective of supply and demand[J]. China Water Resources (10): 57-62.
[58]	王俊, 2007. 全面认识自然资源的价值决定——从劳动价值论、稀缺性理论到可持续发展理论的融合与发展[J]. 中国物价 (4): 40-42.
	WANG J, 2007. Comprehensively understanding the value determination of natural resources: From the integration and development of labor theory of value, scarcity theory to sustainable development theory[J]. China Price Journal (4): 40-42.
[59]	王文丽, 2022. 长江经济带生态系统健康时空演变及其对城镇化的动态响应[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学.
	WANG W L, 2022. Spatial-temporal evolution of ecosystem health and its dynamic response to urbanization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University.
[60]	吴骁远, 吴凤平, 2024. 流域国水资源短缺性组合评价模型及应用[J]. 经济与管理评论, 40(3): 45-58.
	WU X Y, WU F P, 2024. Combined evaluation model and application of water resources shortage in basin countries[J]. Review of Economy and Management, 40(3): 45-58.
[61]	谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等, 2008. 生态系统服务的供给、消费和价值化[J]. 资源科学, 30(1): 93-99.
	XIE G D, ZHEN L, LU C X, et al., 2008. Supply, consumption and valuation of ecosystem services in China[J]. Resources Science, 30(1): 93-99.
[62]	杨渺, 肖燚, 欧阳志云, 等, 2019. 四川省生态系统生产总值(GEP)的调节服务价值核算[J]. 西南民族大学学报(自然科学版), 45(3): 221-232.
	YANG M, XIAO Y, OUYANG Z Y, et al., 2019. Ecosystem regulation services accounting of gross ecosystem product (GEP) in Sichuan province[J]. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Natural Science Edition), 45(3): 221-232.
[63]	杨婉清, 杨鹏, 孙晓, 等, 2022. 北京市景观格局演变及其对多种生态系统服务的影响[J]. 生态学报, 42(16): 6487-6498.
	YANG W Q, YANG P, SUN X, et al., 2022. Changes of landscape pattern and its impacts on multiple ecosystem services in Beijing[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(16): 6487-6498.
[64]	张传兵, 居来提∙色依提, 2022. 基于市场重构的公共生态产品定价机制及对策研究[J]. 价格月刊 (5): 22-27.
	ZHANG C B, JU L S, 2022. Research on pricing mechanism and countermeasures of public ecological products based on market reconstruction[J]. Prices Monthly (5): 22-27.
[65]	张存刚, 田彦平, 2013. 稀缺性本质问题探讨[J]. 兰州商学院学报, 29(2): 69-73.
	ZHANG C G, TIAN Y P, 2013. The discussion of scarcity’s nature[J]. Journal of Lanzhou Commercial College, 29(2): 69-73.
[66]	张林波, 虞慧怡, 李岱青, 等, 2019. 生态产品内涵与其价值实现途径[J]. 农业机械学报, 50(6): 173-183.
	ZHANG L B, YU H Y, LI D Q, et al., 2019. Connotation and value implementation mechanism of ecological products[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 50(6): 173-183.
[67]	张耀启, 李一清, 潘羿, 2005. 自然与环境资源价值评估的误区[J]. 自然资源学报, 20(3): 453-460.
	ZHANG Y Q, LI Y Q, PAN Y, 2005. Critique on non-market valuation of natural and environmental resources[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 20(3): 453-460. DOI
[68]	赵斌, 郑国楠, 王丽, 等, 2022. 公共产品类生态产品价值实现机制与路径[J]. 地方财政研究 (4): 35-46.
	ZHAO B, ZHENG G N, WANG L, et al., 2022. Mechanism and path for value realization of public goods and ecological products[J]. Sub National Fiscal Research (4): 35-46.
[69]	朱青, 蔡永立, 2024. 生态风险与生态系统健康对生态系统服务的影响[J]. 地理学报, 79(5): 1303-1317. DOI
	ZHU Q, CAI Y L, 2024. Impact of ecological risk and ecosystem health on ecosystem services[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 79(5): 1303-1317. DOI
[70]	庄大方, 刘纪远, 1997. 中国土地利用程度的区域分异模型研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 12(2): 10-16.
	ZHUANG D F, LIU J Y, 1997. Study on the model of regional differentiation of land use degree in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 12(2): 10-16.

数据类型	空间分辨率	来源
土地利用数据	30 m	中国科学院资源环境科学与数据中心（https://www.resdc.cn/）
NDVI	30 m	美国地质勘探局（https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/）
NPP	500 m	美国国家航空航天局（https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov）
人口密度	100 m	WorldPop（http://www.worldpop.org）
GDP密度	1 km	中国科学院资源环境科学与数据中心（https://www.resdc.cn/）
社会经济数据	-	《北京市农村经济发展报告》、《北京统计年鉴》、《中国环境统计年鉴》

数据类型	空间分辨率	来源
土地利用数据	30 m	中国科学院资源环境科学与数据中心（https://www.resdc.cn/）
NDVI	30 m	美国地质勘探局（https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/）
NPP	500 m	美国国家航空航天局（https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov）
人口密度	100 m	WorldPop（http://www.worldpop.org）
GDP密度	1 km	中国科学院资源环境科学与数据中心（https://www.resdc.cn/）
社会经济数据	-	《北京市农村经济发展报告》、《北京统计年鉴》、《中国环境统计年鉴》

指标	1 km尺度	乡镇尺度	区县尺度
Moran’s I	0.952^***	0.930^***	0.485^***
z值	245.21	29.21	4.12

指标	1 km尺度	乡镇尺度	区县尺度
Moran’s I	0.952^***	0.930^***	0.485^***
z值	245.21	29.21	4.12

Research on Assessing the Ecosystem Regulating Service Scarcity and Spatial Aggregation Characteristics in Beijing Based on a Multi-Dimensional Perspective

基于多维视角的北京市生态系统调节服务稀缺性评估及其空间聚集特征研究

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 70

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHANG Renfei, XIAO Meng, LIU Zhicheng. Spatio-temporal Heterogeneity and Driving Factors of Landscape Fragmentation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(3): 461-473.
[2]	SUN Yifei, MENG Dan, SONG Jiaying, HU Feifan, LI Xiaojuan. Study on the Diurnal Dynamic Changes of Urban Thermal Environment and Population Heat Exposure Risk within Beijing’s Fifth Ring Road from the Perspective of Local Climate Zones [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(2): 279-292.
[3]	HOU Jinlong, MA Zhiqiang, YANG Cheng, GE Shuangshuang, HE Di, DONG Fan. Analysis of Spatio-temporal Variation of Vegetation Carbon Sources and Sinks in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region and Influencing Factors [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(9): 1329-1338.
[4]	WANG Xuerong, GONG Jianzhou, YU Fangyuan. Mutual Feedback Relationships and Mechanisms of Ecosystem Four Regulating Services in the Greater Bay Area of Guangdong, Hongkong and Macao [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(7): 1130-1141.
[5]	ZHAO Qiong, HU Xi, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Zengkai, XUE Wenbo, ZHAO Jing. Assessment the Environmental Effect of Small Coal-fired Boilers Upgrading in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(10): 1554-1562.
[6]	TIAN Chengshi, SUN Ruixin. Spatial Heterogeneity and Its Influential Factors of Eco-environmental Quality in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: Based on Land Use Transformation of Production, Living and Ecological Spaces [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(7): 1173-1184.
[7]	XIA Meijun, LI Jian, YAN Yongcan. Spatial-temporal Patterns and Evolution Characteristics of Ecological Well-being Performance in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(4): 814-824.
[8]	WANG Jiali, FENG Jingke, YANG Yuanzheng, ZU Jiaxing, CAI Wenhua, YANG Jian. Research on Spatial Relations between Impervious Surfaces and the Urban Thermal Environment in the Central Metropolitan Area of Nanning City [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(3): 525-534.
[9]	HAO Jinhu, WEI Wei, LI Shengnan, MA Muyuan, LI Xiaoxia, YANG Hongguo, JIANG Qiyu, CHAI Peidong. GEE Based Evaluation of the Spatial-temporal Pattern and Drivers of Long-term Water Body in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(3): 556-566.
[10]	XU Ming, ZHANG Fuying, SUN Lulu, ZHOU Zengxing, LIN Chaoba, ZHU Xuezhu. Pollution Characteristics, Source Analysis and Correlation of Biological Factors of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soils of Industrial Areas in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(11): 1952-1963.
[11]	YE Shen, WANG Peng, HUANG Yi, SHE Yuanyang, DING Mingjun. Urban Morphology and the Influence of the Spatial Heterogeneity of PM_2.5 and O₃ Pollution: The Case of the Yangtze River Delta [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(10): 1771-1784.
[12]	SUN Zheng, CAO Yafei, WANG Decai, LIU Feng, SONG Xiaodong, ZHANG Ganlin, WU Huayong. Spatial-temporal Evolution Characteristics and Trend Prediction of Electroplating Sites in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region over the Past 30 Years [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(1): 183-194.
[13]	XUAN Jin, LI Zuchan, ZOU Cheng, QIN Zibo, WU Yahua, HUANG Liujing. Multi-scale Effects of Central Bar Landscape Class and Pattern on Plant Diversity in Minjiang River: The Case of Minjiang River Basin (Fuzhou Section) Planning [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 31(12): 2320-2330.
[14]	NIE Tong, DONG Guotao, JIANG Xiaohui, GUO Xinwei, DANG Suzhen, ZHENG Jiahao, LI Lichan, WANG Jiang. Spatio-temporal Variations and Influencing Factors of Vegetation in Yulin [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 31(1): 26-36.
[15]	LI Shaoning, ZHAO Xu, WANG Junyi, LU Shaowei, ZHAO Na, XU Xiaotian. Dynamic Characteristic Analysis of Negative Air Ion and NO_x Concentration in Beijing Xishan National Forest Park [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 30(8): 1654-1661.