Ecology and Environment ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 1571-1580.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.08.003
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
YAN Dongfeng(), ZHANG Yanyan, LV Kangting, ZHOU Mengli, WANG Ting, ZHAO Ning
Received:
2021-06-05
Online:
2021-08-18
Published:
2021-11-03
作者简介:
闫东锋(1979年生),男,副教授,博士,主要从事森林资源经营与管理和数量生态学研究。E-mail: ydflx@henau.edu.cn
基金资助:
CLC Number:
YAN Dongfeng, ZHANG Yanyan, LV Kangting, ZHOU Mengli, WANG Ting, ZHAO Ning. Niche Characteristics of Dominant Tree Species in Natural Forests at Different Altitudes in the South of Taihang Mountains[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(8): 1571-1580.
闫东锋, 张妍妍, 吕康婷, 周梦丽, 王婷, 赵宁. 太行山南麓不同海拔梯度天然林优势树种生态位特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(8): 1571-1580.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.08.003
样地号 Plot NO. | 优势树种 Dominant trees | 海拔 Attitude/m | 坡度Slope/ (°) | 郁闭度 Canopy density | 林分密度Stand density/ (plant∙hm-2) | 样地号 Plot NO. | 优势树种 Dominant trees | 海拔 Attitude/m | 坡度Slope/ (°) | 郁闭度 Canopy density | 林分密度Stand density/ (plant∙hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 850 | 39 | 0.60 | 3650 | 16 | 槲栎 Quercus aliena | 1222 | 30 | 0.60 | 1925 |
2 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 860 | 25 | 0.70 | 2550 | 17 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1234 | 30 | 0.60 | 1275 |
3 | 槲栎 Quercus aliena | 870 | 13 | 0.80 | 1750 | 18 | 五角枫 Acer mono | 1415 | 37 | 0.80 | 1250 |
4 | 槲栎 Quercus aliena | 955 | 20 | 0.70 | 2050 | 19 | 五角枫 Acer mono | 1430 | 26 | 0.80 | 1175 |
5 | 槲栎 Quercus aliena | 971 | 26 | 0.90 | 4600 | 20 | 青皮椴 Acer davidii | 1486 | 35 | 0.75 | 2750 |
6 | 槲栎 Quercus aliena | 1016 | 40 | 0.70 | 3000 | 21 | 千金榆 Carpinus cordata | 1495 | 35 | 0.75 | 3100 |
7 | 栾树 Koelreuteria paniculata | 1024 | 35 | 0.60 | 2025 | 22 | 青皮椴 Acer davidii | 1521 | 25 | 0.80 | 2400 |
8 | 五角枫 Acer mono | 1080 | 34 | 0.90 | 925 | 23 | 漆树 Toxicodendron vernicifluum | 1535 | 25 | 0.85 | 1575 |
9 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1086 | 24 | 0.70 | 1250 | 24 | 槲栎 Quercus aliena | 1539 | 25 | 0.70 | 2150 |
10 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1114 | 34 | 0.60 | 2825 | 25 | 油松 Pinus tabuliformis | 1554 | 33 | 0.65 | 2000 |
11 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1125 | 15 | 0.60 | 850 | 26 | 青皮椴 Acer davidii | 1582 | 36 | 0.70 | 2475 |
12 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1145 | 25 | 0.65 | 1650 | 27 | 华山松 Pinus armandii | 1720 | 28 | 0.85 | 2075 |
13 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1145 | 34 | 0.75 | 1350 | 28 | 华山松 Pinus armandii | 1787 | 17 | 0.85 | 4100 |
14 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1152 | 27 | 0.60 | 1750 | 29 | 灰皮椴 Tilia japonica | 1813 | 30 | 0.85 | 3300 |
15 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1193 | 30 | 0.60 | 1350 |
Table 1 Basic information of sample plots
样地号 Plot NO. | 优势树种 Dominant trees | 海拔 Attitude/m | 坡度Slope/ (°) | 郁闭度 Canopy density | 林分密度Stand density/ (plant∙hm-2) | 样地号 Plot NO. | 优势树种 Dominant trees | 海拔 Attitude/m | 坡度Slope/ (°) | 郁闭度 Canopy density | 林分密度Stand density/ (plant∙hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 850 | 39 | 0.60 | 3650 | 16 | 槲栎 Quercus aliena | 1222 | 30 | 0.60 | 1925 |
2 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 860 | 25 | 0.70 | 2550 | 17 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1234 | 30 | 0.60 | 1275 |
3 | 槲栎 Quercus aliena | 870 | 13 | 0.80 | 1750 | 18 | 五角枫 Acer mono | 1415 | 37 | 0.80 | 1250 |
4 | 槲栎 Quercus aliena | 955 | 20 | 0.70 | 2050 | 19 | 五角枫 Acer mono | 1430 | 26 | 0.80 | 1175 |
5 | 槲栎 Quercus aliena | 971 | 26 | 0.90 | 4600 | 20 | 青皮椴 Acer davidii | 1486 | 35 | 0.75 | 2750 |
6 | 槲栎 Quercus aliena | 1016 | 40 | 0.70 | 3000 | 21 | 千金榆 Carpinus cordata | 1495 | 35 | 0.75 | 3100 |
7 | 栾树 Koelreuteria paniculata | 1024 | 35 | 0.60 | 2025 | 22 | 青皮椴 Acer davidii | 1521 | 25 | 0.80 | 2400 |
8 | 五角枫 Acer mono | 1080 | 34 | 0.90 | 925 | 23 | 漆树 Toxicodendron vernicifluum | 1535 | 25 | 0.85 | 1575 |
9 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1086 | 24 | 0.70 | 1250 | 24 | 槲栎 Quercus aliena | 1539 | 25 | 0.70 | 2150 |
10 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1114 | 34 | 0.60 | 2825 | 25 | 油松 Pinus tabuliformis | 1554 | 33 | 0.65 | 2000 |
11 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1125 | 15 | 0.60 | 850 | 26 | 青皮椴 Acer davidii | 1582 | 36 | 0.70 | 2475 |
12 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1145 | 25 | 0.65 | 1650 | 27 | 华山松 Pinus armandii | 1720 | 28 | 0.85 | 2075 |
13 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1145 | 34 | 0.75 | 1350 | 28 | 华山松 Pinus armandii | 1787 | 17 | 0.85 | 4100 |
14 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1152 | 27 | 0.60 | 1750 | 29 | 灰皮椴 Tilia japonica | 1813 | 30 | 0.85 | 3300 |
15 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 1193 | 30 | 0.60 | 1350 |
代码 NO. | 物种 Species | 重要值 Importance value | 变异系数 Variance coefficient | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
低海拔样地 Lower altitude plots | 中海拔样地 Medium altitude plots | 高海拔样地 Higher altitude plots | 所有样地 All plots | |||
S1 | 槲栎 Quercus aliena | 0.281 | 0.211 | 0.227 | 0.227 | 0.787 |
S2 | 千金榆 Carpinus cordata | 0.035 | 0.086 | 0.088 | 0.063 | 1.268 |
S3 | 青皮椴 Acer davidii | 0.010 | 0.081 | 0.174 | 0.084 | 1.423 |
S4 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 0.389 | 0.332 | 0.035 | 0.213 | 1.153 |
S5 | 五角枫 Acer mono | 0.056 | 0.103 | 0.045 | 0.060 | 1.207 |
S6 | 白蜡 Fraxinus chinensis | 0.007 | 0.021 | 0.016 | 0.021 | 1.551 |
S7 | 凉子木 Swida alba | 0.019 | 0.019 | 0.010 | 0.021 | 1.841 |
S8 | 漆树 Toxicodendron vernicifluum | 0.008 | 0.026 | 0.039 | 0.029 | 2.032 |
S9 | 白桦 Betula platyphylla | ‒ | ‒ | 0.034 | 0.014 | 3.721 |
S10 | 华山松 Pinus armandii | ‒ | ‒ | 0.093 | 0.039 | 2.814 |
S11 | 油松 Pinus tabuliformis | ‒ | ‒ | 0.127 | 0.050 | 3.043 |
S12 | 灰皮椴 Tilia japonica | ‒ | ‒ | 0.059 | 0.025 | 2.500 |
S13 | 君迁子 Diospyros lotus | 0.047 | 0.009 | 0.002 | 0.023 | 1.887 |
S14 | 栾树 Koelreuteria paniculata | 0.048 | ‒ | 0.002 | 0.020 | 5.231 |
Table 2 Important values and coefficients of variation of dominant tree species at different altitudinal gradients
代码 NO. | 物种 Species | 重要值 Importance value | 变异系数 Variance coefficient | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
低海拔样地 Lower altitude plots | 中海拔样地 Medium altitude plots | 高海拔样地 Higher altitude plots | 所有样地 All plots | |||
S1 | 槲栎 Quercus aliena | 0.281 | 0.211 | 0.227 | 0.227 | 0.787 |
S2 | 千金榆 Carpinus cordata | 0.035 | 0.086 | 0.088 | 0.063 | 1.268 |
S3 | 青皮椴 Acer davidii | 0.010 | 0.081 | 0.174 | 0.084 | 1.423 |
S4 | 栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 0.389 | 0.332 | 0.035 | 0.213 | 1.153 |
S5 | 五角枫 Acer mono | 0.056 | 0.103 | 0.045 | 0.060 | 1.207 |
S6 | 白蜡 Fraxinus chinensis | 0.007 | 0.021 | 0.016 | 0.021 | 1.551 |
S7 | 凉子木 Swida alba | 0.019 | 0.019 | 0.010 | 0.021 | 1.841 |
S8 | 漆树 Toxicodendron vernicifluum | 0.008 | 0.026 | 0.039 | 0.029 | 2.032 |
S9 | 白桦 Betula platyphylla | ‒ | ‒ | 0.034 | 0.014 | 3.721 |
S10 | 华山松 Pinus armandii | ‒ | ‒ | 0.093 | 0.039 | 2.814 |
S11 | 油松 Pinus tabuliformis | ‒ | ‒ | 0.127 | 0.050 | 3.043 |
S12 | 灰皮椴 Tilia japonica | ‒ | ‒ | 0.059 | 0.025 | 2.500 |
S13 | 君迁子 Diospyros lotus | 0.047 | 0.009 | 0.002 | 0.023 | 1.887 |
S14 | 栾树 Koelreuteria paniculata | 0.048 | ‒ | 0.002 | 0.020 | 5.231 |
物种 Species | 低海拔样地 Lower altitude plots | 中海拔样地 Medium altitude plots | 高海拔样地 Higher altitude plots | 所有样地 All plots | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B(L)i | B(S)i | B(L)i | B(S)i | B(L)i | B(S)i | B(L)i | B(S)i | ||||
槲栎 Quercus aliena | 7.293 | 2.153 | 4.023 | 1.548 | 8.269 | 2.200 | 18.316 | 3.098 | |||
千金榆 Carpinus cordata | 4.733 | 1.582 | 3.337 | 1.281 | 4.437 | 1.779 | 11.365 | 2.622 | |||
青皮椴 Acer davidii | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.754 | 0.621 | 7.370 | 2.038 | 9.811 | 2.338 | |||
栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 8.013 | 2.147 | 3.578 | 1.330 | 2.682 | 1.036 | 12.700 | 2.634 | |||
五角枫 Acer mono | 4.270 | 1.772 | 3.773 | 1.430 | 6.292 | 1.892 | 12.054 | 2.752 | |||
白蜡 Fraxinus chinensis | 2.738 | 1.046 | 1.958 | 0.682 | 4.606 | 1.567 | 8.729 | 2.231 | |||
凉子木 Swida alba Opiz | 3.251 | 1.285 | 1.619 | 0.571 | 2.120 | 0.907 | 6.790 | 2.027 | |||
漆树 Toxicodendron vernicifluum | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.878 | 0.822 | 3.155 | 1.395 | 5.816 | 1.977 | |||
白桦 Betula platyphylla | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | 2.018 | 0.832 | 2.018 | 0.838 | |||
华山松 Pinus armandii | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | 3.355 | 1.370 | 3.355 | 1.373 | |||
油松 Pinus tabuliformis | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | 2.917 | 1.084 | 2.917 | 1.084 | |||
灰皮椴 Tilia japonica | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | 4.123 | 1.625 | 4.123 | 1.626 | |||
君迁子 Diospyros lotus | 5.388 | 1.798 | 1.978 | 0.688 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 6.535 | 2.075 | |||
栾树 Koelreuteria paniculata | 1.000 | 0.000 | ‒ | ‒ | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.058 | 0.128 |
Table 3 Niche breadth of dominant species at different altitudinal gradients
物种 Species | 低海拔样地 Lower altitude plots | 中海拔样地 Medium altitude plots | 高海拔样地 Higher altitude plots | 所有样地 All plots | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B(L)i | B(S)i | B(L)i | B(S)i | B(L)i | B(S)i | B(L)i | B(S)i | ||||
槲栎 Quercus aliena | 7.293 | 2.153 | 4.023 | 1.548 | 8.269 | 2.200 | 18.316 | 3.098 | |||
千金榆 Carpinus cordata | 4.733 | 1.582 | 3.337 | 1.281 | 4.437 | 1.779 | 11.365 | 2.622 | |||
青皮椴 Acer davidii | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.754 | 0.621 | 7.370 | 2.038 | 9.811 | 2.338 | |||
栓皮栎 Quercus variabilis | 8.013 | 2.147 | 3.578 | 1.330 | 2.682 | 1.036 | 12.700 | 2.634 | |||
五角枫 Acer mono | 4.270 | 1.772 | 3.773 | 1.430 | 6.292 | 1.892 | 12.054 | 2.752 | |||
白蜡 Fraxinus chinensis | 2.738 | 1.046 | 1.958 | 0.682 | 4.606 | 1.567 | 8.729 | 2.231 | |||
凉子木 Swida alba Opiz | 3.251 | 1.285 | 1.619 | 0.571 | 2.120 | 0.907 | 6.790 | 2.027 | |||
漆树 Toxicodendron vernicifluum | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.878 | 0.822 | 3.155 | 1.395 | 5.816 | 1.977 | |||
白桦 Betula platyphylla | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | 2.018 | 0.832 | 2.018 | 0.838 | |||
华山松 Pinus armandii | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | 3.355 | 1.370 | 3.355 | 1.373 | |||
油松 Pinus tabuliformis | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | 2.917 | 1.084 | 2.917 | 1.084 | |||
灰皮椴 Tilia japonica | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | ‒ | 4.123 | 1.625 | 4.123 | 1.626 | |||
君迁子 Diospyros lotus | 5.388 | 1.798 | 1.978 | 0.688 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 6.535 | 2.075 | |||
栾树 Koelreuteria paniculata | 1.000 | 0.000 | ‒ | ‒ | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.058 | 0.128 |
物种代码 Species number | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | S9 | S10 | S11 | S12 | S13 | S14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | | 0.35 0.45 0.52 0.38 | 0.00 0.13 0.70 0.31 | 0.43 0.76 0.51 0.46 | 0.18 0.51 0.66 0.32 | 0.12 0.18 0.50 0.23 | 0.15 0.18 0.37 0.20 | 0.00 0.13 0.58 0.26 | ‒ ‒ 0.42 0.21 | ‒ ‒ 0.39 0.19 | ‒ ‒ 0.55 0.27 | ‒ ‒ 0.38 0.19 | 0.80 0.70 0.18 0.67 | 0.00 ‒ 0.45 0.01 |
S2 | 0.28 0.41 0.54 0.42 | 0.40 0.89 0.71 0.73 | 0.46 0.19 0.18 0.21 | 0.47 0.92 0.78 0.61 | 0.19 0.90 0.52 0.59 | 0.44 0.79 0.23 0.41 | 0.40 0.81 0.33 0.44 | ‒ ‒ 0.20 0.15 | ‒ ‒ 0.24 0.18 | ‒ ‒ 0.11 0.08 | ‒ ‒ 0.72 0.54 | 0.24 0.81 0.10 0.10 | 0.00 ‒ 0.20 0.00 | |
S3 | 0.00 0.12 0.60 0.27 | 0.18 0.70 0.62 0.56 | 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.01 | 0.89 0.81 0.90 0.62 | 0.00 0.88 0.41 0.51 | 0.82 0.69 0.32 0.41 | 1.00 0.96 0.56 0.66 | ‒ ‒ 0.57 0.47 | ‒ ‒ 0.68 0.55 | ‒ ‒ 0.10 0.08 | ‒ ‒ 0.77 0.63 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 | 0.00 ‒ 0.25 0.01 | |
S4 | 0.45 0.63 0.33 0.43 | 0.36 0.29 0.16 0.28 | 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.01 | 0.29 0.24 0.07 0.26 | 0.35 0.00 0.72 0.19 | 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.14 | 0.00 0.09 0.02 0.02 | ‒ ‒ 0.28 0.03 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.70 0.08 | ‒ ‒ 0.04 0.00 | 0.32 0.52 0.77 0.31 | 0.00 ‒ 0.00 0.00 | |
S5 | 0.32 0.44 0.64 0.43 | 0.28 0.77 0.65 0.53 | 0.43 0.61 0.78 0.46 | 0.40 0.31 0.09 0.30 | 0.23 0.90 0.49 0.52 | 0.77 0.84 0.18 0.71 | 0.89 0.75 0.62 0.59 | ‒ ‒ 0.37 0.12 | ‒ ‒ 0.58 0.18 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.87 0.27 | 0.21 0.42 0.00 0.18 | 0.13 ‒ 0.43 0.10 | |
S6 | 0.09 0.12 0.40 0.20 | 0.19 0.71 0.39 0.44 | 0.00 0.74 0.40 0.42 | 0.22 0.00 0.49 0.19 | 0.22 0.65 0.46 0.42 | 0.20 0.95 0.16 0.43 | 0.00 0.74 0.17 0.28 | ‒ ‒ 0.03 0.02 | ‒ ‒ 0.41 0.24 | ‒ ‒ 0.55 0.32 | ‒ ‒ 0.63 0.36 | 0.06 0.00 0.62 0.06 | 0.67 ‒ 0.00 0.32 | |
S7 | 0.16 0.12 0.22 0.17 | 0.33 0.58 0.19 0.28 | 0.46 0.57 0.32 0.31 | 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.15 | 0.49 0.61 0.26 0.46 | 0.16 0.83 0.28 0.41 | 0.82 0.52 0.14 0.39 | ‒ ‒ 0.03 0.01 | ‒ ‒ 0.27 0.11 | ‒ ‒ 0.63 0.25 | ‒ ‒ 0.21 0.08 | 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.09 | 0.29 ‒ 0.00 0.22 | |
S8 | 0.00 0.20 0.45 0.21 | 0.18 0.55 0.32 0.37 | 1.00 0.84 0.49 0.57 | 0.00 0.15 0.04 0.04 | 0.43 0.57 0.52 0.49 | 0.00 0.58 0.21 0.27 | 0.46 0.41 0.24 0.33 | ‒ ‒ 0.14 0.12 | ‒ ‒ 0.49 0.41 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.33 0.27 | 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.01 | 0.00 ‒ 0.86 0.02 | |
S9 | ‒ ‒ 0.29 0.10 | ‒ ‒ 0.16 0.07 | ‒ ‒ 0.35 0.27 | ‒ ‒ 0.19 0.01 | ‒ ‒ 0.30 0.08 | ‒ ‒ 0.07 0.06 | ‒ ‒ 0.07 0.04 | ‒ ‒ 0.15 0.12 | ‒ ‒ 0.09 0.09 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.18 0.17 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | |
S10 | ‒ ‒ 0.29 0.15 | ‒ ‒ 0.29 0.16 | ‒ ‒ 0.53 0.39 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.44 0.15 | ‒ ‒ 0.34 0.16 | ‒ ‒ 0.22 0.09 | ‒ ‒ 0.42 0.28 | ‒ ‒ 0.09 0.09 | ‒ ‒ 0.06 0.06 | ‒ ‒ 0.65 0.65 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.05 0.00 | |
S11 | ‒ ‒ 0.35 0.12 | ‒ ‒ 0.10 0.05 | ‒ ‒ 0.05 0.04 | ‒ ‒ 0.60 0.04 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.49 0.21 | ‒ ‒ 0.40 0.14 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.05 0.05 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.58 0.04 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | |
S12 | ‒ ‒ 0.38 0.19 | ‒ ‒ 0.59 0.40 | ‒ ‒ 0.63 0.51 | ‒ ‒ 0.06 0.01 | ‒ ‒ 0.72 0.23 | ‒ ‒ 0.51 0.21 | ‒ ‒ 0.36 0.08 | ‒ ‒ 0.44 0.36 | ‒ ‒ 0.16 0.16 | ‒ ‒ 0.50 0.50 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.09 0.00 | |
S13 | 0.64 0.46 0.06 0.45 | 0.24 0.11 0.05 0.19 | 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 | 0.36 0.40 0.47 0.37 | 0.26 0.30 0.00 0.19 | 0.09 0.00 0.29 0.08 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.14 | 0.00 0.15 0.000.03 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.34 0.03 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | 0.00 ‒ 0.00 0.00 | |
S14 | 0.00 ‒ 0.16 0.03 | 0.00 ‒ 0.09 0.03 | 0.00 ‒ 0.09 0.03 | 0.00 ‒ 0.00 0.00 | 0.07 ‒ 0.17 0.06 | 0.40 ‒ 0.00 0.11 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.09 | 0.00 ‒ 0.49 0.03 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.03 0.03 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.04 0.03 | 0.00 ‒ 0.00 0.00 |
Table 4 Niche similarity index and niche overlap index of dominant tree species at different altitudinal gradients
物种代码 Species number | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | S9 | S10 | S11 | S12 | S13 | S14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | | 0.35 0.45 0.52 0.38 | 0.00 0.13 0.70 0.31 | 0.43 0.76 0.51 0.46 | 0.18 0.51 0.66 0.32 | 0.12 0.18 0.50 0.23 | 0.15 0.18 0.37 0.20 | 0.00 0.13 0.58 0.26 | ‒ ‒ 0.42 0.21 | ‒ ‒ 0.39 0.19 | ‒ ‒ 0.55 0.27 | ‒ ‒ 0.38 0.19 | 0.80 0.70 0.18 0.67 | 0.00 ‒ 0.45 0.01 |
S2 | 0.28 0.41 0.54 0.42 | 0.40 0.89 0.71 0.73 | 0.46 0.19 0.18 0.21 | 0.47 0.92 0.78 0.61 | 0.19 0.90 0.52 0.59 | 0.44 0.79 0.23 0.41 | 0.40 0.81 0.33 0.44 | ‒ ‒ 0.20 0.15 | ‒ ‒ 0.24 0.18 | ‒ ‒ 0.11 0.08 | ‒ ‒ 0.72 0.54 | 0.24 0.81 0.10 0.10 | 0.00 ‒ 0.20 0.00 | |
S3 | 0.00 0.12 0.60 0.27 | 0.18 0.70 0.62 0.56 | 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.01 | 0.89 0.81 0.90 0.62 | 0.00 0.88 0.41 0.51 | 0.82 0.69 0.32 0.41 | 1.00 0.96 0.56 0.66 | ‒ ‒ 0.57 0.47 | ‒ ‒ 0.68 0.55 | ‒ ‒ 0.10 0.08 | ‒ ‒ 0.77 0.63 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 | 0.00 ‒ 0.25 0.01 | |
S4 | 0.45 0.63 0.33 0.43 | 0.36 0.29 0.16 0.28 | 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.01 | 0.29 0.24 0.07 0.26 | 0.35 0.00 0.72 0.19 | 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.14 | 0.00 0.09 0.02 0.02 | ‒ ‒ 0.28 0.03 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.70 0.08 | ‒ ‒ 0.04 0.00 | 0.32 0.52 0.77 0.31 | 0.00 ‒ 0.00 0.00 | |
S5 | 0.32 0.44 0.64 0.43 | 0.28 0.77 0.65 0.53 | 0.43 0.61 0.78 0.46 | 0.40 0.31 0.09 0.30 | 0.23 0.90 0.49 0.52 | 0.77 0.84 0.18 0.71 | 0.89 0.75 0.62 0.59 | ‒ ‒ 0.37 0.12 | ‒ ‒ 0.58 0.18 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.87 0.27 | 0.21 0.42 0.00 0.18 | 0.13 ‒ 0.43 0.10 | |
S6 | 0.09 0.12 0.40 0.20 | 0.19 0.71 0.39 0.44 | 0.00 0.74 0.40 0.42 | 0.22 0.00 0.49 0.19 | 0.22 0.65 0.46 0.42 | 0.20 0.95 0.16 0.43 | 0.00 0.74 0.17 0.28 | ‒ ‒ 0.03 0.02 | ‒ ‒ 0.41 0.24 | ‒ ‒ 0.55 0.32 | ‒ ‒ 0.63 0.36 | 0.06 0.00 0.62 0.06 | 0.67 ‒ 0.00 0.32 | |
S7 | 0.16 0.12 0.22 0.17 | 0.33 0.58 0.19 0.28 | 0.46 0.57 0.32 0.31 | 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.15 | 0.49 0.61 0.26 0.46 | 0.16 0.83 0.28 0.41 | 0.82 0.52 0.14 0.39 | ‒ ‒ 0.03 0.01 | ‒ ‒ 0.27 0.11 | ‒ ‒ 0.63 0.25 | ‒ ‒ 0.21 0.08 | 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.09 | 0.29 ‒ 0.00 0.22 | |
S8 | 0.00 0.20 0.45 0.21 | 0.18 0.55 0.32 0.37 | 1.00 0.84 0.49 0.57 | 0.00 0.15 0.04 0.04 | 0.43 0.57 0.52 0.49 | 0.00 0.58 0.21 0.27 | 0.46 0.41 0.24 0.33 | ‒ ‒ 0.14 0.12 | ‒ ‒ 0.49 0.41 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.33 0.27 | 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.01 | 0.00 ‒ 0.86 0.02 | |
S9 | ‒ ‒ 0.29 0.10 | ‒ ‒ 0.16 0.07 | ‒ ‒ 0.35 0.27 | ‒ ‒ 0.19 0.01 | ‒ ‒ 0.30 0.08 | ‒ ‒ 0.07 0.06 | ‒ ‒ 0.07 0.04 | ‒ ‒ 0.15 0.12 | ‒ ‒ 0.09 0.09 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.18 0.17 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | |
S10 | ‒ ‒ 0.29 0.15 | ‒ ‒ 0.29 0.16 | ‒ ‒ 0.53 0.39 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.44 0.15 | ‒ ‒ 0.34 0.16 | ‒ ‒ 0.22 0.09 | ‒ ‒ 0.42 0.28 | ‒ ‒ 0.09 0.09 | ‒ ‒ 0.06 0.06 | ‒ ‒ 0.65 0.65 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.05 0.00 | |
S11 | ‒ ‒ 0.35 0.12 | ‒ ‒ 0.10 0.05 | ‒ ‒ 0.05 0.04 | ‒ ‒ 0.60 0.04 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.49 0.21 | ‒ ‒ 0.40 0.14 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.05 0.05 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.58 0.04 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | |
S12 | ‒ ‒ 0.38 0.19 | ‒ ‒ 0.59 0.40 | ‒ ‒ 0.63 0.51 | ‒ ‒ 0.06 0.01 | ‒ ‒ 0.72 0.23 | ‒ ‒ 0.51 0.21 | ‒ ‒ 0.36 0.08 | ‒ ‒ 0.44 0.36 | ‒ ‒ 0.16 0.16 | ‒ ‒ 0.50 0.50 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.09 0.00 | |
S13 | 0.64 0.46 0.06 0.45 | 0.24 0.11 0.05 0.19 | 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 | 0.36 0.40 0.47 0.37 | 0.26 0.30 0.00 0.19 | 0.09 0.00 0.29 0.08 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.14 | 0.00 0.15 0.000.03 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.34 0.03 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | 0.00 ‒ 0.00 0.00 | |
S14 | 0.00 ‒ 0.16 0.03 | 0.00 ‒ 0.09 0.03 | 0.00 ‒ 0.09 0.03 | 0.00 ‒ 0.00 0.00 | 0.07 ‒ 0.17 0.06 | 0.40 ‒ 0.00 0.11 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.09 | 0.00 ‒ 0.49 0.03 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.03 0.03 | ‒ ‒ 0.00 0.00 | ‒ ‒ 0.04 0.03 | 0.00 ‒ 0.00 0.00 |
[1] |
ARELLANO G, CALA V, MACIA M J, 2014. Niche breadth of oligarchic species in Amazonian and Andean rain forests[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 25(6): 1355-1366.
DOI URL |
[2] |
MULLER R, NOWICKI C, BARTHLOTT W, et al., 2003. Biodiversity and endemism mapping as a tool for regional conservation planning: Case study of the Pleurothallidinae (Orchidaceae) of the Andeanrain forests in Bolivia[J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12(10): 2005-2024.
DOI URL |
[3] |
SOBERON J, PETERSON A T, 2005. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species distributional areas[J]. Biodiversity Infomatics, DOI: 10.17161/bi.v2i0.4.
DOI |
[4] |
WALKER B, 1995. Conserving biological diversity through ecosysytem resilience[J]. Conservation Biology, 9(4): 747-752.
DOI URL |
[5] |
白晓航, 张金屯, 2017. 小五台山森林群落优势种的生态位分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 28(12): 3815-3826.
PMID |
BAI X H, ZHANG J T, 2017. Niche analysis of dominant species of forest community in Xiaowutai Mountain, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 28(12): 3815-3826.
DOI PMID |
|
[6] | 董东, 许小天, 周志翔, 等, 2019. 安徽九华山风景区古树群落主要种群生态位的动态变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 38(5): 1292-1304. |
DONG D, XU X T, ZHOU Z X, et al., 2019. Niche dynamics of main populations of old-tree communities in Jiuhua Mountain Scenic Area of Anhui Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 38(5): 1292-1304. | |
[7] | 龚辉, 2020. 闽北正好菇宿地森林群落主要种群高度生态位[J]. 北华大学学报(自然科学版), 21(6): 812-817. |
GONG H, 2020. Height niche of dominant populations of forest community with Russula vinosa Lindbl in Northern Fujian[J]. Journal of Beihua University (Natural Science), 21(6): 812-817. | |
[8] | 郭平平, 税伟, 江聪, 等, 2019. 退化天坑倒石坡林下优势物种生态位特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 30(11): 3635-3645. |
GUO P P, SHUI W, JIANG C, et al., 2019. Niche characteristics of understory dominant species of talus slope in degraded tiankeng[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 30(11): 3635-3645. | |
[9] | 郭燕, 杨邵, 沈雅飞, 等, 2018. 三峡库区消落带现存草本植物组成与生态位[J]. 应用生态学报, 29(11): 3559-3568. |
GUO Y, YANG S, SHEN Y F, et al., 2018. Composition and niche of the existing herbaceous plants in the water-level-fluctuating zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29(11): 3559-3568. | |
[10] | 胡喜生, 洪伟, 吴承祯, 等, 2004. 长苞铁杉群落优势种群高度生态位研究[J]. 广西植物, 24(4): 323-328. |
HU X S, HONG W, WU C Z, et al., 2004. Height niche characteristics of dominant populations in the Tsuga longibracteata community[J]. Guihaia, 24(4): 323-328. | |
[11] | 李一凡, 刘梦芸, 甘先华, 等, 2020. 深圳市坝光湿地园银叶树群落优势种生态位特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 29(11):2171-2178. |
LI Y F, LIU M Y, GAN X H, et al., 2020. Niche characteristics of the dominant species of the Heritiera littoralis community in Baguang Wetland Park, Shenzhen[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 29(11): 2171-2178. | |
[12] | 黄庆丰, 吴开华, 唐雪海, 等, 2013. 安徽铜陵叶山次生阔叶混交林主要树种的生态位特征分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 22(3): 45-51. |
HUANG Q F, WU K H, TANG X H, et al., 2013. Analysis on niche characteristics of main tree species of secondary broad-leaved mixed forest in Yeshan of Tongling of Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 22(3): 45-51. | |
[13] | 李怀珠, 党晗, 许金石, 等, 2020. 不同方法研究太白山不同海拔梯度林下主要草本植物群落的种间关联[J]. 西北林学院学报, 35(6): 66-73. |
LI H Z, DANG H, XU J S, et al., 2020. Interspecific associations of the main under herbaceous community across altitudinal gradients on the Taibai Mountain by different approaches[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 35(6): 66-73. | |
[14] | 李菁, 骆有庆, 石娟, 等, 2011. 阿尔山地区兴安落叶松林下植物种群生态位[J]. 林业科学研究, 24(5): 651-658. |
LI J, LUO Y Q, SHI J, et al., 2011. Niche of main understory populations of Larix gmelinii Rupr Forest in A'ershan Area[J]. Forest Research, 24(5): 651-658. | |
[15] | 李军玲, 张金屯, 2006. 太行山中段植物群落优势种生态位研究[J]. 植物研究, 26(2): 156-162. |
LI J L, ZHANG J T, 2006. Niche of dominant species in the Midst of Taihang Mountain[J]. Bulletin of botanical research, 26(2): 156-162. | |
[16] | 李玫, 郑松发, 陈玉军, 等, 2005. 海南岛东寨港几种红树植物种间生态位研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 16(3): 403-407. |
LI M, ZHENG S F, CHEN Y J, et al., 2005. Niches of several mangrove species in Dongzhai Harbor of Hainan Island[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 16(3): 403-407. | |
[17] | 王慧敏, 朱仲元, 张璐, 2019. 典型草原群落特征及种群生态位对土壤类型响应研究--以锡林河流域为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 28(12): 2364-2372. |
WANG H M, ZHU Z Y, ZHANG L, 2019. Effects of different soil types on community characteristics and population niche in typical grassland: Taking the Xilin River basin as an example[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 28(12): 2364-2372. | |
[18] | 李一凡, 刘梦芸, 甘先华, 等, 2020. 深圳市坝光湿地园银叶树群落优势种生态位特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 29(11): 2171-2178. |
LI Y F, LIU M Y, GAN X H, et al., 2020. Niche characteristics of the dominant species of the Heritiera littoralis community in Baguang Wetland Park, Shenzhen[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 29(11): 2171-2178. | |
[19] | 刘润红, 常斌, 荣春燕, 等, 2018. 漓江河岸带枫杨群落主要木本植物种群生态位[J]. 应用生态学报, 29(12): 3917-3926. |
LIU R H, CHANG B, RONG C Y, et al., 2018. Niche of main woody plant populations of Pterocarya stenoptera community in riparian zone of Lijiang River, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29(12): 3917-3926. | |
[20] | 张建利, 吴华, 喻理飞, 等, 2013. 基于群落数量特征的喀斯特湿地森林群落优势种分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 22(1): 58-65. |
ZHANG J L, WU H, YU L F, et al., 2013. Study on dominant species of karst wetland watershed forest based on the community quantitative characteristics[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 22(1): 58-65. | |
[21] | 苏志尧, 吴大荣, 陈北光, 2003. 粤北天然林优势种群生态位研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 14(1): 25-29. |
SU Z Y, WU D R, CHEN B G, 2003. Niche characteristics of dominant populations in natural forest in North Guangdong[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 14(1): 25-29. | |
[22] | 万娟, 叶立新, 丁文勇, 等, 2014. 浙江省自然保护区常绿阔叶林优势种群的生态位特征[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 41(6): 725-734. |
WAN J, YE L X, DING W Y, et al., 2014. The niche of dominant populations in evergreen broad-leaved forest of Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 41(6): 725-734. | |
[23] | 万猛, 田大伦, 樊巍, 2009. 太行山南麓栓皮栎群落结构特征分析[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 43(2): 139-144, 150. |
WAN M, TIAN D L, FAN W, 2009. Structure characteristics of the Quercus variabilis forest community in the south area of Taihang Moutains[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 43(2): 139-144, 150. | |
[24] | 王进, 冯佳伟, 牛帅, 等, 2016. 太行山区物种生态位特征以及种间相关性对比分析[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 50(2): 181-188. |
WANG J, FENG J W, NIU S, et al., 2016. Comparative analysis of niche characteristics of the species and interspecific correlation in Taihang mountains[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 50(2): 181-188. | |
[25] | 王正文, 王德利, 2001. 大兴安岭森林草原过渡带白桦及主要草本植物生态位关系的研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 12(5): 677-681. |
WANG Z W, WANG D L, 2001. Niche relationships between Betula platyphylla and main understory herbages in forest-steppe ecotone of Daxinganling Mountains[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 12(5): 677-681. | |
[26] | 吴霖东, 李婷婷, 傅国林, 等, 2020. 极小种群野生植物浙江安息香的生态位和种间关系[J]. 浙江大学学报 (农业与生命科学版), 46(4): 459-474. |
WU L D, LI T T, FU G L, et al., 2020. Niche and interspecific relationship of the wild plant Styrax zhejiangensis with extremely small population[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture & Life Sciences), 46(4): 459-474. | |
[27] | 罗欢, 吴琼, 陈倩, 等, 2021. 生态修复后九曲湾水库浮游动物优势种演替及生态位特征分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 30(2): 320-330. |
LUO H, WU Q, CHEN Q, et al., 2021. Succession of dominant zooplankton species and analysis of niche characteristics in Jiuquwan Reservoir after ecological restoration[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 30(2): 320-330. | |
[28] | 许诺, 林开敏, 吴培培, 等, 2017. 杉木老龄林乔木层主要树种生态位研究[J]. 森林与环境学报, 37(3): 330-335. |
XU N, LIN K M, WU P P, et al., 2017. Niche of main species in the tree layer of old-growth Chinese fir forest[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 37(3): 330-335. | |
[29] | 闫美芳, 上官铁梁, 张金屯, 等, 2006. 五台山蓝花棘豆群落优势种群生态位研究[J]. 草业学报, 15(2): 60-67. |
YAN M F, SHANGGUAN T L, ZHANG J T, et al., 2006. Niche characteristics of dominant species from Oxytropis coerulea communities in mount Wutai, Shanxi[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 15(2): 60-67. | |
[30] | 闫淑君, 洪伟, 吴承祯, 等, 2002. 万木林中亚热带常绿阔叶林林隙主要树种的高度生态位[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 8(6): 578-582. |
YAN S J, HONG W, WU C Z, et al., 2002. Height niche of main tree species of gaps in mid-subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in wanmulin of Fujian[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 8(6): 578-582. | |
[31] | 杨新东, 陈流保, 曾献兴, 等, 2020. 广东翁源青云山自然保护区森林群落优势树种的生态位特征[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 28(6): 565-573. |
YANG X D, CHEN L B, ZENG X X, et al., 2020. Niche characteristics of dominant species of forest community in Qingyunshan Natural Reserve, Wengyuan, Guangdong Province[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 28(6): 565-573. | |
[32] | 曾洪, 陈小红, 2017. 极小种群野生植物圆叶玉兰的生态位研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 35(2): 220-226. |
ZENG H, CHEN X H, 2017. Ecological niche of extremely small population of wild Oyama sinensis[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 35(2): 220-226. | |
[33] | 张国强, 巨天珍, 刘文桢, 等, 2020. 天水小陇山红豆杉群落特征的生态学意义[J]. 林业科学研究, 35(5): 184-190. |
ZHANG G Q, JU T Z, LIU W Z, et al., 2020. Ecological significance of community characteristics of Taxus chinensis in Xiaolongshan Mountains of Tianshui[J]. Forest Research, 35(5): 184-190. | |
[34] | 赵辉, 2018. 太行山南麓次生林树种组成特征及环境解释[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学: 1-3. |
ZHAO H, 2018. The characteristic and environment interpretation of the species composition of secondary in the southern Taihang Mountain[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University: 1-3. | |
[35] | 赵家豪, 叶钰倩, 陈斌, 等, 2021. 江西武夷山南方铁杉针阔混交林主要植物生态位特征[J]. 林业科学, 57(1): 191-199. |
ZHAO J H, YE Y Q, CHEN B, et al., 2021. Niche Characteristics of dominant plants of coniferous (Tsuga chinensis var. tchekiangensis) and broad-leaf mixed forest in Jiangxi Wuyishan, China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 57(1): 191-199. |
[1] | CHEN Keyi, LIN Tianmiao, WANG Jianjun, HE Youjun, ZHANG Liwen. Effects of Natural Forest Conservation Project on Forest Carbon Pool of Key State-Owned Forest Region of Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang Province in the Past 20 Years [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(6): 1016-1025. |
[2] | QIN Hao, LI Mengai, GAO Jin, CHEN Kailong, ZHANG Yinbo, ZHANG Feng. Composition and Diversity of Soil Bacterial Communities in Shrub at Different Altitudes in Luya Mountain [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 459-468. |
[3] | CAI Xi'an, HUANG Juan, WU Tong, LIU Juxiu, JIANG Fen, WANG Senhao. Study on Methane Emission from Tree Leaves [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(9): 1842-1847. |
[4] | QI Xuelian, GE Xiaomin, QIAN Zhuangzhuang, ZHANG Kang, ZHENG Xu, QIAN Qi, DING Hui, TANG Luozhong. Differences of Soil Properties between Natural Mixed Coniferous and Broad-leaved Forest and Moso Bamboo Plantation in Wuyi Mountains [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(8): 1599-1606. |
[5] | ZHAO Li, GUO Chunyan, ZHANG Wenjun, WANG Xiaojiang, LIU Pingsheng. Community Characteristics and Their Correlation Analysis of Typical Natural Forest in Zhalantun [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(7): 1353-1359. |
[6] | HE Bin, LI Qing, CHEN Qunli, LI Wangjun, YOU Ping. Altitudinal Pattern of Species Diversity of Pseudotsuga sinensis Communty in Northwestern Guizhou, China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(6): 1111-1120. |
[7] | WANG Yiquan, ZHOU Zhang, LI Yide, CHEN Dexiang, ZHANG Tao, YANG Fan. The Spatial-temporal Pattern and Influencing Factors of Negative Air Ions in Tropical Forests, Hainan, China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(5): 898-906. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn