Ecology and Environment ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 1285-1292.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.07.001
• Research Articles • Next Articles
JIANG Chaoqiang1(), LI Chen2, ZHU Qifa3, XU Haiqing3, LIU Yanhong2, SHEN Jia1, YAN Yifeng1, YU Fei1, ZU Chaolong1,*(
)
Received:
2022-02-08
Online:
2022-07-18
Published:
2022-08-31
Contact:
ZU Chaolong
姜超强1(), 李晨2, 朱启法3, 徐海清3, 刘炎红2, 沈嘉1, 阎轶峰1, 余飞1, 祖朝龙1,*(
)
通讯作者:
祖朝龙
作者简介:
姜超强(1980年生),男,副研究员,博士,主要从事作物营养与高效施肥研究。E-mail: chaoqjiang@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
JIANG Chaoqiang, LI Chen, ZHU Qifa, XU Haiqing, LIU Yanhong, SHEN Jia, YAN Yifeng, YU Fei, ZU Chaolong. Evaluation of Carbon Sink and Economic Benefit in Different Planting Patterns in Southern Anhui[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(7): 1285-1292.
姜超强, 李晨, 朱启法, 徐海清, 刘炎红, 沈嘉, 阎轶峰, 余飞, 祖朝龙. 皖南不同种植模式碳汇效应及经济效益评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(7): 1285-1292.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.07.001
种植模式 Planting patterns | 作物种类 Crop types | 播种或移栽日期 Sowing or transplanting date | 收获日期 Harvest date | 肥料用量 Fertilizer application rate/(kg∙hm-2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | ||||
单季稻 Single-cropping rice | 中稻 | 2020-06-03 | 2020-10-07 | 180 | 90 | 90 |
烟稻轮作 Tobacco-rice | 烤烟 | 2020-03-21 | 2020-07-20 | 105 | 160 | 360 |
晚稻 | 2020-07-22 | 2020-10-26 | 75 | 40 | 40 | |
稻麦轮作 Rice-wheat | 中稻 | 2020-06-03 | 2020-10-07 | 180 | 90 | 90 |
冬小麦 | 2020-10-30 | 2021-05-28 | 150 | 90 | 90 | |
再生稻 Ratoon rice | 头季稻 | 2020-04-20 | 2020-08-15 | 150 | 75 | 75 |
再生稻 | — | 2020-10-30 | 60 | 30 | 30 |
Table 1 Management practice of different planting patterns
种植模式 Planting patterns | 作物种类 Crop types | 播种或移栽日期 Sowing or transplanting date | 收获日期 Harvest date | 肥料用量 Fertilizer application rate/(kg∙hm-2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | ||||
单季稻 Single-cropping rice | 中稻 | 2020-06-03 | 2020-10-07 | 180 | 90 | 90 |
烟稻轮作 Tobacco-rice | 烤烟 | 2020-03-21 | 2020-07-20 | 105 | 160 | 360 |
晚稻 | 2020-07-22 | 2020-10-26 | 75 | 40 | 40 | |
稻麦轮作 Rice-wheat | 中稻 | 2020-06-03 | 2020-10-07 | 180 | 90 | 90 |
冬小麦 | 2020-10-30 | 2021-05-28 | 150 | 90 | 90 | |
再生稻 Ratoon rice | 头季稻 | 2020-04-20 | 2020-08-15 | 150 | 75 | 75 |
再生稻 | — | 2020-10-30 | 60 | 30 | 30 |
种植模式 Planting patterns | 作物种类 Crop types | 收获产量 Yield/(kg∙hm-2) | 收获产值 Output/(yuan∙hm-2) | 总产值 Total output/(yuan∙hm-2) | 总投入 Total input/(yuan∙hm-2) | 净收益 Net income/(yuan∙hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单季稻 Single-cropping rice | 中稻 | 9513.5 | 18265.9 | 18265.9d | 9150.0d | 9115.9c |
烟稻轮作 Tobacco-rice | 烤烟 | 1903.0 | 53284.0 | 68292.6a | 48576.0a | 19716.6a |
晚稻 | 7817.0 | 15008.6 | ||||
稻麦轮作 Rice-wheat | 中稻 | 9293.5 | 18587.0 | 30216.8b | 17280.0b | 12936.8b |
冬小麦 | 6390.0 | 11629.8 | ||||
再生稻 Ratoon rice | 头季稻 | 8557.0 | 17456.3 | 26359.9c | 12012.0c | 14347.9b |
再生稻 | 4364.5 | 8903.6 |
Table 2 Yield and economic benefits of different planting patterns
种植模式 Planting patterns | 作物种类 Crop types | 收获产量 Yield/(kg∙hm-2) | 收获产值 Output/(yuan∙hm-2) | 总产值 Total output/(yuan∙hm-2) | 总投入 Total input/(yuan∙hm-2) | 净收益 Net income/(yuan∙hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单季稻 Single-cropping rice | 中稻 | 9513.5 | 18265.9 | 18265.9d | 9150.0d | 9115.9c |
烟稻轮作 Tobacco-rice | 烤烟 | 1903.0 | 53284.0 | 68292.6a | 48576.0a | 19716.6a |
晚稻 | 7817.0 | 15008.6 | ||||
稻麦轮作 Rice-wheat | 中稻 | 9293.5 | 18587.0 | 30216.8b | 17280.0b | 12936.8b |
冬小麦 | 6390.0 | 11629.8 | ||||
再生稻 Ratoon rice | 头季稻 | 8557.0 | 17456.3 | 26359.9c | 12012.0c | 14347.9b |
再生稻 | 4364.5 | 8903.6 |
Figure 1 Carbon flux estimation in paddy ecosystem production under different planting patterns Values followed by different lowercase letters in the same parameter are significantly different among the treatment (P<0.05, n=3)
种植模式 Planting patterns | 作物种类 Crop types | 碳吸收 C adsorption/ (kg∙hm-2∙a-1) | 碳排放 C emission/ (kg∙hm-2∙a-1) | 净碳汇 Net C sink/ (kg∙hm-2∙a-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
单季稻 Single-cropping rice | 中稻 | 6761.0a | 5573.2a | 1187.9b |
烟稻轮作 Tobacco-rice | 烤烟 | 1836.6f | 3300.0c | -1463.4d |
晚稻 | 5581.3c | 4933.4b | 647.9c | |
稻麦轮作 Rice-wheat | 中稻 | 6675.9a | 5573.2a | 1102.7b |
冬小麦 | 4523.2d | 2535.8d | 1987.4a | |
再生稻 Ratoon rice | 头季稻 | 6119.5b | 4801.5b | 1318.0b |
再生稻 | 3118.9e | 2624.4d | 494.5c |
Table 3 Carbon flux estimation of different crops in paddy ecosystem production under different planting patterns
种植模式 Planting patterns | 作物种类 Crop types | 碳吸收 C adsorption/ (kg∙hm-2∙a-1) | 碳排放 C emission/ (kg∙hm-2∙a-1) | 净碳汇 Net C sink/ (kg∙hm-2∙a-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
单季稻 Single-cropping rice | 中稻 | 6761.0a | 5573.2a | 1187.9b |
烟稻轮作 Tobacco-rice | 烤烟 | 1836.6f | 3300.0c | -1463.4d |
晚稻 | 5581.3c | 4933.4b | 647.9c | |
稻麦轮作 Rice-wheat | 中稻 | 6675.9a | 5573.2a | 1102.7b |
冬小麦 | 4523.2d | 2535.8d | 1987.4a | |
再生稻 Ratoon rice | 头季稻 | 6119.5b | 4801.5b | 1318.0b |
再生稻 | 3118.9e | 2624.4d | 494.5c |
种植模式 Planting patterns | CH4 | N2O | 肥料 Fertilizers | 劳力 Labor | 柴油 Diesel | 农药 Pesticides | 种子 Seeds | 农膜 Film | 合计 Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单季稻 Single-cropping rice | 56.5 | 14.4 | 18.8 | 1.9 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 100 |
烟稻轮作 Tobacco-rice | 38.8 | 19.5 | 15.9 | 6.0 | 8.9 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 8.3 | 100 |
稻麦轮作 Rice-wheat | 39.4 | 23.1 | 24.0 | 2.5 | 6.3 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 100 |
再生稻 Ratoon rice | 54.5 | 18.0 | 16.5 | 1.7 | 7.5 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 100 |
Table 4 Source of carbon footprint under different planting patterns %
种植模式 Planting patterns | CH4 | N2O | 肥料 Fertilizers | 劳力 Labor | 柴油 Diesel | 农药 Pesticides | 种子 Seeds | 农膜 Film | 合计 Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单季稻 Single-cropping rice | 56.5 | 14.4 | 18.8 | 1.9 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 100 |
烟稻轮作 Tobacco-rice | 38.8 | 19.5 | 15.9 | 6.0 | 8.9 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 8.3 | 100 |
稻麦轮作 Rice-wheat | 39.4 | 23.1 | 24.0 | 2.5 | 6.3 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 100 |
再生稻 Ratoon rice | 54.5 | 18.0 | 16.5 | 1.7 | 7.5 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 100 |
种植模式 Planting patterns | 作物种类 Crop types | CH4 | N2O | 肥料 Fertilizers | 劳力 Labor | 柴油 Diesel | 农药 Pesticides | 种子 Seeds | 农膜 Film | 合计 Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单季稻 Single-cropping rice | 中稻 | 56.5 | 14.4 | 18.8 | 1.9 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 100 |
烟稻 Tobacco-rice | 烤烟 | 1.4 | 24.4 | 26.2 | 11.7 | 12.7 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 20.7 | 100 |
晚稻 | 63.9 | 16.3 | 8.9 | 2.1 | 6.4 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 100 | |
稻麦 Rice-wheat | 中稻 | 56.5 | 14.4 | 18.8 | 1.9 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 100 |
冬小麦 | 1.8 | 42.3 | 35.4 | 4.1 | 6.3 | 1.3 | 8.9 | 0.0 | 100 | |
再生稻 Ratoon rice | 头季稻 | 56.2 | 14.0 | 18.2 | 2.1 | 7.3 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 100 |
再生稻 | 51.4 | 25.5 | 13.3 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100 |
Table 5 Source of carbon footprint of different crops %
种植模式 Planting patterns | 作物种类 Crop types | CH4 | N2O | 肥料 Fertilizers | 劳力 Labor | 柴油 Diesel | 农药 Pesticides | 种子 Seeds | 农膜 Film | 合计 Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单季稻 Single-cropping rice | 中稻 | 56.5 | 14.4 | 18.8 | 1.9 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 100 |
烟稻 Tobacco-rice | 烤烟 | 1.4 | 24.4 | 26.2 | 11.7 | 12.7 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 20.7 | 100 |
晚稻 | 63.9 | 16.3 | 8.9 | 2.1 | 6.4 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 100 | |
稻麦 Rice-wheat | 中稻 | 56.5 | 14.4 | 18.8 | 1.9 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 100 |
冬小麦 | 1.8 | 42.3 | 35.4 | 4.1 | 6.3 | 1.3 | 8.9 | 0.0 | 100 | |
再生稻 Ratoon rice | 头季稻 | 56.2 | 14.0 | 18.2 | 2.1 | 7.3 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 100 |
再生稻 | 51.4 | 25.5 | 13.3 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100 |
[1] |
MA J, MA E D, XU H, et al., 2019. Wheat straw management affects CH4 and N2O emissions from rice fields[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 41(5): 1022-1028.
DOI URL |
[2] |
TANG H M, XIAO X P, LI C, et al., 2019. Effects of different soil tillage systems on soil carbon management index under double-cropping rice field in southern China[J]. Agronomy Journal, 111(1): 440-446.
DOI URL |
[3] |
THANGARAJAN R, BOLAN N S, TIAN G L, et al., 2013. Role of organic amendment application on greenhouse gas emission from soil[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 465(1): 72-96.
DOI URL |
[4] |
ZISKA L H, FLEISHER D H, LINSCOMBE S, 2018. Ratooning as an adaptive management tool for climatic change in rice systems along a northsouth transect in the southern Mississippi Valley[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 263: 409-416.
DOI URL |
[5] |
ZOU J W, LIU S W, QIN Y M, et al., 2009. Sewage irrigation increased methane and nitrous oxide emission from rice paddies in southeast China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 129(4): 516-522.
DOI URL |
[6] | 卜容燕, 韩上, 程文龙, 等, 2022. 皖南单季稻区种植利用紫云英对水稻产量、氮肥利用率及稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, [2022-05-20] https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5498.S.20211203.1239.004.html. |
BU R Y, HAN S, CHENG W L, et al., 2022. Effects of Chinese milk vetch on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and quality of rice in single cropping rice area of Southern Anhui Province[J]. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, [2022-05-20] https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5498.S.20211203.1239.004.html. | |
[7] | 陈中督, 徐春春, 纪龙, 等, 2019. 长江中游地区稻麦生产系统碳足迹及氮足迹综合评价[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 25(7): 1125-1133. |
CHEN Z D, XU C C, JI L, et al., 2019. Comprehensive evaluation for carbon and nitrogen footprints of rice-wheat rotation system in Middle Yangtze River Basin[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 25(7): 1125-1133. | |
[8] | 邓桥江, 曹凑贵, 李成芳, 2019. 不同再生稻栽培模式对稻田温室气体排放和产量的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 38(6): 11373-1380. |
DENG Q J, CAO C G, LI C F, 2019. Effects of different ratooning cultivation modes on greenhouse gas emissions and grain yields in paddy fields[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 38(6): 1373-1380. | |
[9] | 董建江, 邵伏文, 张林, 等, 2015. 不同耕作模式对稻田土壤理化性质及经济效益的影响[J]. 土壤, 47(3): 509-514. |
DONG J J, SHAO F W, ZHANG L, et al., 2015. Effects of tillage patterns on physical and chemical properties of paddy soils and economic efficiency[J]. Soils, 47(3): 509-514. | |
[10] | 高嵩涓, 周国朋, 曹卫东, 2020. 南方稻田紫云英作冬绿肥的增产节肥效应与机制[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 26(12): 2115-2126. |
GAO S J, ZHOU G P, CAO W D, 2020. Effects of milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus) as winter green manure on rice yield and rate of fertilizer application in rice paddies in south China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 26(12): 2115-2126. | |
[11] | 国家技术监督局, 1992. 烤烟: GB 2635-1992 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社. |
The National Technical Supervision Bureau, 1992. Flue-cured tobacco: GB 2635-1992 [S]. Beijing: China Standards Press. | |
[12] | 和智君, 罗会龙, 钟浩, 等, 2010. 烟叶烘烤密集型烤房节能技术途径分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 26(8): 337-340. |
HE Z J, LUO H L, ZHONG H, et al., 2010. The energy saving technology analysis of bulk curing barn[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 26(8): 337-340. | |
[13] | 胡乃娟, 史航, 朱利群, 2018. 不同麦秸还田方式对周年稻麦轮作农田碳足迹的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 27(12): 2775-2783. |
HU N J, SHI H, ZHU L Q, 2018. Effects of dfifferent straw returning modes on carbon footprint in a rice-wheat rotation system[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 27(12): 2775-2783. | |
[14] | 胡志华, 李大明, 徐小林, 等, 2017. 不同有机培肥模式下双季稻田碳汇效应与收益评估[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 25(2): 157-165. |
HU Z H, LI D M, XU X L, et al., 2017. Evaluation of net carbon sink effects and costs/benefits of double-cropped rice fields under different organic fertilizer applications[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 25(2): 157-165. | |
[15] | 姜振辉, 杨旭, 刘益珍, 等, 2019. 春玉米-晚稻与早稻-晚稻种植模式碳足迹比较[J]. 生态学报, 39(21): 8091-8099. |
JIANG Z H, YANG X, LIU Y Z, et al., 2019. Comparison of carbon footprint between spring maize-late rice and early rice-late rice cropping system[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(21): 8091-8099. | |
[16] | 蒋静艳, 黄耀, 宗良纲, 2003. 水分管理与秸杆施用对稻田CH4和N2O排放的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 23(5): 552-556. |
JIANG J Y, HUANG Y, ZONG L G, 2003. Influence of water controlling and straw application on CH4 and N2O from rice field[J]. China Environmental Science, 23(5): 552-556. | |
[17] | 孔盼, 夏苏敬, 张海维, 等, 2021. 耕作方式对早稻-再生稻稻田氨挥发的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 30(8): 1627-1633. |
KONG P, XIA S J, ZHANG H W, et al., 2021. Effects of tillage methods on ammonia volatilization of early season rice-ratooning rice fields[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 30(8): 1627-1633. | |
[18] | 李得兰, 徐华, 蔡祖聪, 2008. 稻田CH4和N2O排放消长关系及其减排措施[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 27(6): 2123-2130. |
LI D L, XU H, CAI Z C, 2008. Trade-off relationship and mitigation options of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddy field[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 27(6): 2123-2130. | |
[19] | 林文雄, 陈鸿飞, 张志兴, 等, 2015. 再生稻产量形成的生理生态特性与关键栽培技术的研究与展望[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 23(4): 392-401. |
LIN W X, CHEN H F, ZHANG Z X, et al., 2015. Research and prospect on physio-ecological properties of ratoon rice yield formation and its key cultivation technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 23(4): 392-401. | |
[20] |
刘青丽, 蒋雨洲, 邹焱, 等, 2020. 烟田生态系统碳收支研究[J]. 作物学报, 46(8): 1258-1265.
DOI |
LIU Q L, JIANG Y Z, ZOU Y, et al., 2020. The study of carbon budget on field-tobacco ecosystem[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 46(8): 1258-1265.
DOI URL |
|
[21] | 刘青丽, 邹焱, 蒋雨洲, 等, 2021. 不同施肥措施下烟田生态系统碳收支研究[J]. 中国烟草科学, 42(3): 50-56. |
LIU Q L, ZOU Y, JIANG Y Z, et al., 2021. Effects of fertilization measures on carbon budget of the tobacco-field ecosystem[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 42(3): 50-56. | |
[22] | 刘巽浩, 徐文修, 李增嘉, 等, 2013. 农田生态系统碳足迹法:误区、改进与应用--兼析中国集约农作碳效率[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 34(6): 1-11. |
LIU X H, XU W X, LI Z J, et al., 2013. The missteps, improvement and application of carbon footprint methodology in farmland ecosystems with the case study of analyzing the carbon efficiency of China’s intensive farming[J]. Journal of China Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 34(6): 1-11. | |
[23] | 吕泽芳, 高珍珍, 刘章勇, 等, 2020. 再生稻栽培模式下冬半年覆盖植被对土壤CH4和N2O排放的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 59(15): 60-65. |
LÜ Z F, GAO Z Z, LIU Z Y, et al., 2020. Effects of cover plant in winter on soil CH4 and N2O emission under the ratoon rice system[J]. Hubei Agricultural Science, 59(15): 60-65. | |
[24] | 马怀英, 王上, 杨亚东, 等, 2021. 燕麦与豆科作物间作的产量、经济效益与碳足迹分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 26(8): 23-32. |
MA H Y, WANG S, YANG Y D, et al., 2021. Intercropping of oat with mung bean, peanut, and soybean: Yield advantages, economic benefits and carbon footprints[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 26(8): 23-32. | |
[25] | 孟宇辉, 金文俊, 董召荣, 等, 2019. 江淮地区不同水旱轮作模式的资源利用效率与经济效益比较[J]. 生态学杂志, 38(11): 3357-3365. |
MENG Y H, JIN W J, DONG Z R, et al., 2019. Comparison of resource utilization efficiency and economic benefit of different paddy-upland rotation systems in Jianghuai region[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 38(11): 3357-3365. | |
[26] | 佘玮, 黄璜, 官春云, 等, 2016. 我国典型农作区作物生产碳汇功能研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 18(1): 106-113. |
SHE W, HUANG H, GUAN C Y, et al., 2016. Study on the carbon sink function of crop production in typical agricultural areas of China[J]. Engineering Science, 18(1): 106-113. | |
[27] | 苏燕, 李婕, 曹雪颖, 等, 2020. 水旱轮作模式下马铃薯根际土壤细菌群落多样性分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 51(10): 2374-2382. |
SU Y, LI J, CAO X Y, et al., 2020. Diversity analysis of bacterial community in potato rhizosphere soil under the mode of paddy-upland rotation[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 51(10): 2374-2382. | |
[28] | 唐海明, 李超, 肖小平, 等, 2020. 不同耕作模式对双季稻田生态系统净碳汇效应及收益的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 29(2): 215-222. |
TANG H M, LI C, XIAO X P, et al., 2020. Influences of different tillage on net carbon sink and economic benefit of paddy ecosystem under double-cropping rice field[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 29(2): 215-222. | |
[29] | 田卡, 张丽, 钟旭华, 等, 2015. 稻草还田和冬种绿肥对华南双季稻产量及稻田CH4排放的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 34(3): 592-598. |
TIAN K, ZHANG L, ZHONG X H, et al., 2015. Effects of rice straw and winter green manure incorporations on grain yields and methane emissions of double-season rice (Oryza sativa) field in south China[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 34(3): 592-598. | |
[30] | 王浩田, 姜超强, 蒋瑀霁, 等, 2020. 皖南沿江平原不同年限烟-稻轮作土壤团聚体组成与烤烟产质量的关系[J]. 土壤, 52(5): 1057-1067. |
WANG H T, JIANG C Q, JIANG Y J, et al., 2020. Relationship between soil aggregate composition with yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco under different rice-tobacco rotation years in Yangtse plain South Anhui[J]. Soils, 52(5): 1057-1067. | |
[31] | 王天宇, 樊迪, 宋开付, 等, 2021. 巢湖圩区再生稻田甲烷及氧化亚氮的排放规律研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 40(8): 1829-1838. |
WANG T Y, FAN D, SONG K F, et al., 2021. Reduced methane and nitrous oxide emissions from ratoon rice paddy in Chaohu polder area, China[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 40(8): 1829-1838. | |
[32] | 吴玉红, 王吕, 崔月贞, 等, 2021. 轮作模式及秸秆还田对水稻产量、稻米品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 27(11): 1926-1937. |
WU Y H, WANG L, CUI Y Z, et al., 2021. Rice yield, quality, and soil fertility in response to straw incorporation and rotation pattern[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 27(11): 1926-1937. | |
[33] | 相智华, 方双红, 姚旺家, 等, 2020. 皖南烟区新型种植模式研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 48(3): 232-235. |
XIANG Z H, FANG S H, YAO W J, et al., 2020. Research on new cropping system in Southern Anhui tobacco area[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 48(3): 232-235. | |
[34] | 徐富贤, 熊洪, 张林, 等, 2015. 再生稻产量形成特点与关键调控技术研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 48(9): 1702-1717. |
XU F X, XIONG H, ZHANG L, et al., 2015. Progress in research of yield formation of ratooning rice and its high-yielding key regulation technologies[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 48(9): 1702-1717. | |
[35] | 曾昭海, 2018. 豆科作物与禾本科作物轮作研究进展及前景[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 26(1): 57-61. |
ZENG Z H, 2018. Progress and perspective of legume-gramineae rotations[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 26(1): 57-61. | |
[36] | 张浪, 徐华勤, 李林林, 等, 2019. 再生稻和双季稻田CH4排放对比研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 52(12): 2101-2113. |
ZHANG L, XU H Q, LI L L, et al., 2019. Comparative study on CH4 emission from ratoon rice and double-cropping rice fields[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 52(12): 2101-2113. | |
[37] | 张立成, 邵继海, 林毅青, 等, 2017. 稻-稻-油菜轮作对土壤微生物活性和多样性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 26(2): 204-210. |
ZHANG L C, SHAO J H, LIN Y Q, et al., 2017. Influence of microbial diversity and activity of soil on the rice-rice-rape rotation[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 26(2): 204-210. | |
[38] | 张鹏, 钟川, 周泉, 等, 2019. 不同冬种模式对稻田土壤碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 27(8): 1163-1171. |
ZHANG P, ZHONG C, ZHOU Q, et al., 2019. Effects of different winter planting patterns on carbon management index of paddy field[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 27(8): 1163-1171. | |
[39] | 张若焰, 陈儒, 王秀娟, 等, 2019. 现代烟草农业的碳效应核算与分析--以陕西省烟草合作社为例[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 27(12): 1903-1915. |
ZHANG R Y, CHEN R, WANG X J, et al., 2019. Carbon effect of modern tobacco agriculture: Based on tobacco cooperatives in Shaanxi Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 27(12): 1903-1915. |
[1] | ZHANG Lu, HE Yufei, CHEN Tan, YANG Ting, ZHANG Bing, JIN Jun. The Spatial and Temporal Pattern Evolution of Carbon Footprint of Farmland Ecosystem in Fenwei Plain from 2011 to 2020 [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(6): 1149-1162. |
[2] | YANG Yaodong, CHEN Yumei, TU Pengfei, ZENG Qingru. Phytoremediation Potential of Economic Crop Rotation Patterns for Cadmium-polluted Farmland [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 627-634. |
[3] | XIAO Guoju, LI Xiujing, GUO Zhanqiang, HU Yanbin, WANG Jing. Effects of Soil Organic Carbon on Maize Growth and Water Use at the Eastern Foot of Helan Mountain in Ningxia [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(9): 1754-1764. |
[4] | WU Haoping, QIN Hongjie, HE Bin, YOU Yi, CHEN Jinfeng, ZOU Chunping, YANG Siyu, HAO Beibei. A Brief Discussion on the Development Trend of the Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution Control Model Based on Carbon Neutrality [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(9): 1919-1926. |
[5] | LI Chengwei, LIU Zhangyong, GONG Songling, YANG Wei, LI Shaoqiu, ZHU Bo. Effects of Changing Rice Cropping Patterns on CH4 and N2O Emissions from Paddy Fields [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(5): 961-968. |
[6] | HAO Xiaoyu, WANG Xiaojun, GAO Hongsheng, MAO Mingyan, SUN Lei, MA Xingzhu, ZHOU Baoku, CHI Fengqin, LI Weiqun. Estimation of Greenhouse Gas Emission and Carbon Footprint of Farmland under Different Straw Returning Methods in Songnen Plain [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(2): 318-325. |
[7] | CAO Yun, SUN Yinglong, JIANG Yueqing, WAN Jun. Analysis on Temporal-spatial Variations and Driving Factors of Net Ecosystem Productivity in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(11): 2101-2110. |
[8] | HAN Fang, BAO Yuanyuan, LIU Xiangyu, ZHANG Xinyong, WEI Denghui, ZHANG Haoran, TIAN Qinglong. Effects of Different Potato Rotation Patterns on Fungal Community Structure in Rhizosphere Soil [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(7): 1412-1419. |
[9] | XIA Zitai, CHENG Weiwei, ZHAO Jixia, LI Yongmei, FAN Maopan. Effects of Different Planting Patterns on Maize Root System and Soil Aggregate Stability [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(12): 2331-2338. |
[10] | ZHAO Qiguo, SHEN Renfang, TENG Ying, LI Xiuhua. Pilot Progress, Problems and Countermeasures on Farmland Rotation and Fallow System in the Heavy Metal Polluted Region of China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2017, 26(12): 2003-2007. |
[11] | ZHAO Qiguo, TENG Ying, HUANG Guoqin. Consideration about Exploring Pilot Program of Farmland Rotation and Fallow System in China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2017, 26(1): 1-5. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn