Ecology and Environmental Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 298-310.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.02.013
• Environmental Science • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Baoqiang1(
), ZHAO Hengzhe1, HUANG Shan2,*(
), ZHOU Xingang3,4
Received:2025-06-01
Revised:2025-11-29
Accepted:2025-12-01
Online:2026-02-18
Published:2026-02-09
Contact:
HUANG Shan
通讯作者:
黄山
作者简介:王宝强(1985年生)男,副教授,博士,研究方向为城乡生态环境规划。E-mail: wbq318@163.com
基金资助:CLC Number:
WANG Baoqiang, ZHAO Hengzhe, HUANG Shan, ZHOU Xingang. Research on Ecological Network Resilience Assessment and Optimization in Jiangsu Province Based on Disturbance Scenario Simulation[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(2): 298-310.
王宝强, 赵衡哲, 黄山, 周新刚. 基于扰动情景模拟的江苏省生态网络韧性评估与优化研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(2): 298-310.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.02.013
| 阻力因子 | 权重 | 分类区间 | 阻力赋值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 土地利用类型 | 0.2632 | 林地 | 1 |
| 草地 | 15 | ||
| 水域 | 30 | ||
| 耕地 | 50 | ||
| 其他用地 | 70 | ||
| 城乡建设用地 | 100 | ||
| 坡度/° | 0.1266 | [0, 5) | 1 |
| [5, 15) | 10 | ||
| [15, 25) | 40 | ||
| [25, 35) | 70 | ||
| ≥35° | 100 | ||
| 距离道路距离/m | 0.3029 | [0, 200) | 100 |
| [200, 500) | 75 | ||
| [500, 800) | 50 | ||
| [800, 1000) | 25 | ||
| ≥1000 | 1 | ||
| 距离建设用地距离/m | 0.2101 | [0, 500) | 100 |
| [500, 1000) | 75 | ||
| [1000, 1500) | 50 | ||
| [1500, 2000) | 25 | ||
| ≥2000 | 1 | ||
| NDVI | 0.0917 | [0, 0.1) | 100 |
| [0.1, 0.3) | 75 | ||
| [0.3, 0.6) | 50 | ||
| [0.6, 0.8) | 25 | ||
| ≥0.8 | 1 |
Table 1 Resistance factor weight and grading assignment
| 阻力因子 | 权重 | 分类区间 | 阻力赋值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 土地利用类型 | 0.2632 | 林地 | 1 |
| 草地 | 15 | ||
| 水域 | 30 | ||
| 耕地 | 50 | ||
| 其他用地 | 70 | ||
| 城乡建设用地 | 100 | ||
| 坡度/° | 0.1266 | [0, 5) | 1 |
| [5, 15) | 10 | ||
| [15, 25) | 40 | ||
| [25, 35) | 70 | ||
| ≥35° | 100 | ||
| 距离道路距离/m | 0.3029 | [0, 200) | 100 |
| [200, 500) | 75 | ||
| [500, 800) | 50 | ||
| [800, 1000) | 25 | ||
| ≥1000 | 1 | ||
| 距离建设用地距离/m | 0.2101 | [0, 500) | 100 |
| [500, 1000) | 75 | ||
| [1000, 1500) | 50 | ||
| [1500, 2000) | 25 | ||
| ≥2000 | 1 | ||
| NDVI | 0.0917 | [0, 0.1) | 100 |
| [0.1, 0.3) | 75 | ||
| [0.3, 0.6) | 50 | ||
| [0.6, 0.8) | 25 | ||
| ≥0.8 | 1 |
| 重要性指标 | 2000年 | 2005年 | 2010年 | 2015年 | 2020年 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 度中心性 | 0.1555 | 0.1692 | 0.1938 | 0.2331 | 0.2078 |
| 接近中心性 | 0.0753 | 0.0870 | 0.0787 | 0.0717 | 0.0633 |
| 中介中心性 | 0.7692 | 0.7438 | 0.7275 | 0.6952 | 0.7289 |
Table 2 Node importance index weight
| 重要性指标 | 2000年 | 2005年 | 2010年 | 2015年 | 2020年 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 度中心性 | 0.1555 | 0.1692 | 0.1938 | 0.2331 | 0.2078 |
| 接近中心性 | 0.0753 | 0.0870 | 0.0787 | 0.0717 | 0.0633 |
| 中介中心性 | 0.7692 | 0.7438 | 0.7275 | 0.6952 | 0.7289 |
| 干扰情景 | 内涵 | 情景设定 | 生态影响 | 生态网络韧性模拟方法 | 优化策略 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 随机攻击 | 指生态系统中的组分以均等概率受到破坏或移除,与它们的特性无关 | ①自然灾害:野火、洪水、飓风等随机破坏部分栖息地或物种 ②随机捕捞、狩猎或砍伐 ③疾病随机传播 ④气候变化的部分影响:如温度升高随机影响某些物种的生存 ⑤随机物种灭绝:由于环境波动导致物种随机消失 ⑥广泛栖息地破坏:城市化或农业扩张破坏部分栖息地 | ①若生态系统具有高冗余性,随机攻击可能影响较小。若攻击范围广,仍可能导致生态系统功能逐渐退化 ②对生态网络而言,随机移除生态斑块或廊道时,生态景观类型越丰富、组成结构越复杂,生态网络越稳定、韧性越高;若多数物种功能相似,随机攻击对网络稳定性影响较小;随机攻击可能导致部分模块断开,但全局功能可能维持;当攻击超过一定比例,生态网络可能突然崩溃 | 随机移除网络中的节点或边,不针对任何特定属性。本研究随机选择节点依次在网络中移除,与该节点相连的边也一并移除 | ①提升网络冗余:在拓扑结构中介性低的区域新增生态踏脚石斑块 ②增强模块化:构建子网间多路径连接 ③增加异质性:混合植被类型降低同质风险 |
| 目标攻击 | 攻击针对生态系统中具有特定属性的组分,通常因其重要性而被选择性破坏 | ①移除关键物种:捕食者被过度猎杀,导致食物链崩溃 ②传粉者减少,影响植物繁殖 ③基石物种被破坏,导致群落结构 剧变 ④破坏高连接度节点:如砍伐森林中的“母树”、湿地中分解者的消失导致物质循环中断、选择性开发资源、采伐特定树种导致栖息地单一化 | ①降低生态系统稳定性,引发生态失衡 ②对生态网络而言,会造成:级联灭绝,即关键节点移除会通过依赖关系引发次级灭绝;网络分裂,即生态网络可能断裂为孤立子网,生态功能如能量流动、物质循环等严重受损;恢复困难,关键节点通常不可替代 | 优先移除网络中具有特定属性的节点或边,如高度节点、高介数中心性节点、高连接度斑块或廊道。按照节点重要性从高到低依次移除节点,与节点相连的边也一并移除 | ①核心节点加固:为高中心节点建立缓冲区 ②功能替代设计:培育次级枢纽节点分担压力 ③廊道备份:为生态战略通道建立替代路径 |
Table 3 Ecological implications of simulating interference scenarios
| 干扰情景 | 内涵 | 情景设定 | 生态影响 | 生态网络韧性模拟方法 | 优化策略 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 随机攻击 | 指生态系统中的组分以均等概率受到破坏或移除,与它们的特性无关 | ①自然灾害:野火、洪水、飓风等随机破坏部分栖息地或物种 ②随机捕捞、狩猎或砍伐 ③疾病随机传播 ④气候变化的部分影响:如温度升高随机影响某些物种的生存 ⑤随机物种灭绝:由于环境波动导致物种随机消失 ⑥广泛栖息地破坏:城市化或农业扩张破坏部分栖息地 | ①若生态系统具有高冗余性,随机攻击可能影响较小。若攻击范围广,仍可能导致生态系统功能逐渐退化 ②对生态网络而言,随机移除生态斑块或廊道时,生态景观类型越丰富、组成结构越复杂,生态网络越稳定、韧性越高;若多数物种功能相似,随机攻击对网络稳定性影响较小;随机攻击可能导致部分模块断开,但全局功能可能维持;当攻击超过一定比例,生态网络可能突然崩溃 | 随机移除网络中的节点或边,不针对任何特定属性。本研究随机选择节点依次在网络中移除,与该节点相连的边也一并移除 | ①提升网络冗余:在拓扑结构中介性低的区域新增生态踏脚石斑块 ②增强模块化:构建子网间多路径连接 ③增加异质性:混合植被类型降低同质风险 |
| 目标攻击 | 攻击针对生态系统中具有特定属性的组分,通常因其重要性而被选择性破坏 | ①移除关键物种:捕食者被过度猎杀,导致食物链崩溃 ②传粉者减少,影响植物繁殖 ③基石物种被破坏,导致群落结构 剧变 ④破坏高连接度节点:如砍伐森林中的“母树”、湿地中分解者的消失导致物质循环中断、选择性开发资源、采伐特定树种导致栖息地单一化 | ①降低生态系统稳定性,引发生态失衡 ②对生态网络而言,会造成:级联灭绝,即关键节点移除会通过依赖关系引发次级灭绝;网络分裂,即生态网络可能断裂为孤立子网,生态功能如能量流动、物质循环等严重受损;恢复困难,关键节点通常不可替代 | 优先移除网络中具有特定属性的节点或边,如高度节点、高介数中心性节点、高连接度斑块或廊道。按照节点重要性从高到低依次移除节点,与节点相连的边也一并移除 | ①核心节点加固:为高中心节点建立缓冲区 ②功能替代设计:培育次级枢纽节点分担压力 ③廊道备份:为生态战略通道建立替代路径 |
| 威胁因子 | 最大影响距离 | 权重 | 距离衰减函数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 耕地 | 2 | 0.5 | 指数函数 |
| 其他用地 | 1 | 0.3 | 指数函数 |
| 城乡建设用地 | 8 | 1 | 指数函数 |
| 道路 | 2 | 0.7 | 线性函数 |
Table 4 Threat factors and related coefficients
| 威胁因子 | 最大影响距离 | 权重 | 距离衰减函数 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 耕地 | 2 | 0.5 | 指数函数 |
| 其他用地 | 1 | 0.3 | 指数函数 |
| 城乡建设用地 | 8 | 1 | 指数函数 |
| 道路 | 2 | 0.7 | 线性函数 |
| 土地利用类型 | 生境质量 | 耕地 | 其他用地 | 城乡建设用地 | 道路 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 耕地 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| 林地 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1 | 0.9 |
| 灌木 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| 草地 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 水域 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| 其他用地 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| 城乡建设用地 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 5 Habitat suitability and its relative sensitivity to different sources of threat
| 土地利用类型 | 生境质量 | 耕地 | 其他用地 | 城乡建设用地 | 道路 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 耕地 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| 林地 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1 | 0.9 |
| 灌木 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| 草地 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 水域 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| 其他用地 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| 城乡建设用地 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 年份 | 统计指标 | 景观类型 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 核心区 | 边缘 | 桥接 | 孔隙 | 支线 | 环道 | 孤岛 | ||
| 2000 | 面积/km2 | 1.09×104 | 1.44×103 | 2.78×102 | 1.35×102 | 4.65×102 | 1.29×102 | 5.10×102 |
| 占比/% | 78.58 | 10.44 | 2.01 | 0.98 | 3.37 | 0.94 | 3.69 | |
| 2005 | 面积/km2 | 1.13×104 | 1.65×103 | 3.29×102 | 1.62×102 | 5.39×102 | 1.44×102 | 5.40×102 |
| 占比/% | 77.00 | 11.28 | 2.25 | 1.11 | 3.68 | 0.98 | 3.69 | |
| 2010 | 面积/km2 | 1.11×104 | 1.74×103 | 3.11×102 | 1.59×102 | 5.48×102 | 1.36×102 | 5.57×102 |
| 占比/% | 76.27 | 11.98 | 2.13 | 1.09 | 3.76 | 0.93 | 3.82 | |
| 2015 | 面积/km2 | 1.05×104 | 1.76×103 | 3.24×102 | 1.61×102 | 5.80×102 | 1.33×102 | 6.26×102 |
| 占比/% | 74.61 | 12.46 | 2.30 | 1.14 | 4.11 | 0.94 | 4.44 | |
| 2020 | 面积/km2 | 9.60×103 | 1.61×103 | 2.93×102 | 1.10×102 | 5.54×102 | 1.07×102 | 7.36×102 |
| 占比/% | 73.78 | 12.39 | 2.25 | 0.85 | 4.26 | 0.82 | 5.65 | |
| 2000-2020 | 面积/km2 | −1.25×103 | 1.71×102 | 1.54×101 | −2.49×101 | 8.96×101 | −2.25×101 | 2.26×102 |
| 占比/% | −11.53 | 11.89 | 5.56 | −18.46 | 19.29 | −17.41 | 44.25 | |
Table 6 Statistics of ecological landscape types in Jiangsu Province from 2000 to 2020
| 年份 | 统计指标 | 景观类型 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 核心区 | 边缘 | 桥接 | 孔隙 | 支线 | 环道 | 孤岛 | ||
| 2000 | 面积/km2 | 1.09×104 | 1.44×103 | 2.78×102 | 1.35×102 | 4.65×102 | 1.29×102 | 5.10×102 |
| 占比/% | 78.58 | 10.44 | 2.01 | 0.98 | 3.37 | 0.94 | 3.69 | |
| 2005 | 面积/km2 | 1.13×104 | 1.65×103 | 3.29×102 | 1.62×102 | 5.39×102 | 1.44×102 | 5.40×102 |
| 占比/% | 77.00 | 11.28 | 2.25 | 1.11 | 3.68 | 0.98 | 3.69 | |
| 2010 | 面积/km2 | 1.11×104 | 1.74×103 | 3.11×102 | 1.59×102 | 5.48×102 | 1.36×102 | 5.57×102 |
| 占比/% | 76.27 | 11.98 | 2.13 | 1.09 | 3.76 | 0.93 | 3.82 | |
| 2015 | 面积/km2 | 1.05×104 | 1.76×103 | 3.24×102 | 1.61×102 | 5.80×102 | 1.33×102 | 6.26×102 |
| 占比/% | 74.61 | 12.46 | 2.30 | 1.14 | 4.11 | 0.94 | 4.44 | |
| 2020 | 面积/km2 | 9.60×103 | 1.61×103 | 2.93×102 | 1.10×102 | 5.54×102 | 1.07×102 | 7.36×102 |
| 占比/% | 73.78 | 12.39 | 2.25 | 0.85 | 4.26 | 0.82 | 5.65 | |
| 2000-2020 | 面积/km2 | −1.25×103 | 1.71×102 | 1.54×101 | −2.49×101 | 8.96×101 | −2.25×101 | 2.26×102 |
| 占比/% | −11.53 | 11.89 | 5.56 | −18.46 | 19.29 | −17.41 | 44.25 | |
| [1] |
DINDAROGLU T, 2021. Determination of ecological networks for vegetation connectivity using GIS & AHP technique in the Mediterranean degraded karst ecosystems[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 188: 104385.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
DUAN Z S, CHEN G R, HUANG L, 2007. Complex network synchronizability: Analysis and control[J]. Physical Review E, 76(5): 056103.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
DANG H, BAI J Z, LÜ Y H, et al., 2024. The cascade failure model under ecological network is effective for quantifying the resilience of urban regions[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 114: 105749.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
HONG W Y, GUO R Z, LI X M, et al., 2022. Measuring urban ecological network resilience: A disturbance scenario simulation method[J]. Cities, 131: 104057.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
HUANG X X, WANG H J, SHAN L Y, et al., 2021. Constructing and optimizing urban ecological network in the context of rapid urbanization for improving landscape connectivity[J]. Ecological Indicators, 132: 108319.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
LI J X, NIE W B, ZHANG M X, et al., 2024. Assessment and optimization of urban ecological network resilience based on disturbance scenario simulations: A case study of Nanjing city[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 438: 140812.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
MCRAE B H, DICKSON B G, KEITT T H, et al., 2008. Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation[J]. Ecology, 89(10): 2712-2724.
DOI PMID |
| [8] |
SAURA S, PASCUAL-HORTAL L, 2007. A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: Comparison with existing indices and application to a case study[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83(2-3): 91-103.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
SONG S, XU D W, HU S S, et al., 2021. Ecological network optimization in urban central district based on complex network theory: A case study with the urban Central District of Harbin[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4): 1427.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
WANG T W, HUANG Y C, CHENG J H, et al., 2024. Construction and optimization of watershed - scale ecological network based on complex network method: A case study of Erhai Lake Basin in China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 160: 111794.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
WEI H, ZHU H, CHEN J, et al., 2022. Construction and optimization of ecological security pattern in the Loess Plateau of China based on the minimum cumulative resistance (MCR) model[J]. Remote Sensing, 14(22): 5906.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
XIANG Q, YU H, HUANG H, et al., 2024. Assessing the resilience of complex ecological spatial networks using a cascading failure model[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434: 140014.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
YANG J, HUANG X, 2021. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019[J]. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13(8): 3907-3925.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
YANG J L, DONG J W, XIAO X M, et al., 2019. Divergent shifts in peak photosynthesis timing of temperate and alpine grasslands in China[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 233: 111395.
DOI URL |
| [15] | ZHANG L X, REN Z H, CHEN B, et al., 2024. A Prolonged Artificial Nighttime-light Dataset of China (1984-2020) [J]. Scientific Data, 11: 414. |
| [16] | ZHAO S M, MA Y F, WANG J L, et al., 2019. Landscape pattern analysis and ecological network planning of Tianjin City[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 46: 126479. |
| [17] |
ZHAO R D, FANG C L, LIU H M, et al., 2021. Evaluating urban ecosystem resilience using the DPSIR framework and the ENA model: A case study of 35 cities in China[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 72: 102997.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
ZHENG S W, YANG S J, MA M H, et al., 2023. Linking cultural ecosystem service and urban ecological - space planning for a sustainable city: Case study of the core areas of Beijing under the context of urban relieving and renewal[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 89: 104292.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
蔡国俊, 袁桂香, 符辉, 2022. 基于文献计量分析的生态网络研究现状和趋势[J]. 生态环境学报, 31(8): 1690-1699.
DOI |
| CAI G J, YUAN G X, FU H, 2022. Status and trends on ecological networks research: A review based on bibliometric analysis[J]. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 31(8): 1690-1699. | |
| [20] | 曹加杰, 傅剑玮, 2023. 基于InVEST模型和最小成本路径的城市绿色空间生境网络构建方法研究: 以南京为例[J]. 中国园林, 39(1): 53-58. |
| CAO J J, FU J W, 2023. A study on the construction of urban green space habitat network based on InVEST model and least cost path: A case study of Nanjing[J]. Chinese Gardens, 39(1): 53-58. | |
| [21] | 陈德超, 施祝凯, 王祖静, 等, 2020. 苏州环太湖地区生态网络构建与空间冲突识别[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 36(6): 778-787. |
| CHEN D C, SHI Z K, WANG Z J, et al., 2020. Ecological Network Construction and Spatial Conflict Identification in Suzhou Taihu Lake Area[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 36(6): 778-787. | |
| [22] | 陈瑾, 赵超超, 赵青, 等, 2023. 基于MSPA分析的福建省生态网络构建[J]. 生态学报, 43(2): 603-614. |
| CHEN J, ZHAO C C, ZHAO Q, et al., 2023. Construction of ecological network in Fujian Province based on MSPA analysis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(2): 603-614. | |
| [23] |
陈南南, 康帅直, 赵永华, 等, 2021. 基于MSPA和MCR模型的秦岭 (陕西段) 山地生态网络构建[J]. 应用生态学报, 32(5): 1545-1553.
DOI |
| CHEN N N, KANG S Z, ZHAO Y H, et al., 2021. Construction of mountainous ecological network in Qinling (Shaanxi section) based on MSPA and MCR models[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 32(5): 1545-1553. | |
| [24] |
冯义龙, 贺萌, 李波, 等, 2025. 重庆主城区城市生态网络构建与优化[J]. 生态环境学报, 34(5): 699-709.
DOI |
| FENG Y L, HE M, LI B, et al., 2025. Construction and optimization of urban ecological network in Chongqing main urban Area[J]. Journal of Eco-Environment, 34(5): 699-709. | |
| [25] | FORMAN R T T, 2018. 土地镶嵌体:景观与区域生态学[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社: 325-326. |
| FORMAN R T T, 2018. Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions[M]. Beijing: China Building Industry Press: 325-326. | |
| [26] |
古璠, 黄义雄, 陈传明, 等, 2017. 福建省自然保护区生态网络的构建与优化[J]. 应用生态学报, 28(3): 1013-1020.
DOI |
| GU F, HUANG Y X, CHEN C M, et al., 2017. Construction and optimization of ecological network in nature reserves of Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 28(3): 1013-1020. | |
| [27] |
姜虹, 彭建, 2024. 自然保护地连通网络构建与优化的方法及前瞻[J]. 地理学报, 79(9): 2176-2190.
DOI |
|
JIANG H, PENG J, 2024. Methods, optimization and prospects for the construction of connectivity networks in protected areas[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 79(9): 2176-2190.
DOI |
|
| [28] | 刘晓阳, 曾坚, 曾鹏, 2020. 厦门市绿地生态网络构建及优化策略[J]. 中国园林, 36(7): 76-81. |
| LIU X Y, ZENG J., ZENG P, 2020. Construction and optimization strategy of Xiamen's green space ecological network[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 36(7): 76-81. | |
| [29] | 施晓辉, 梁坤宇, 2025. 基于生态供需与土地变化的生态安全格局构建——以江苏省江阴市为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 32(5): 423-434. |
| SHI X H, LIANG K Y, 2025. Construction of ecological security pattern based on ecological supply and demand and land change: A case study of Jiangyin City, Jiangsu Province[J]. Soil and Water Conservation Research, 32(5): 423-434. | |
| [30] | 王海云, 匡耀求, 文薪荐, 等, 2022. 粤港澳大湾区生态网络构建及廊道优化[J]. 中国环境科学, 42(5): 2289-2298. |
| WANG H Y, KUANG Y Q, WEN X J, et al., 2022. Construction and corridor optimization of ecological network in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area[J]. China Environmental Science, 42(5): 2289-2298. | |
| [31] | 吴健生, 张理卿, 彭建, 等, 2013. 深圳市景观生态安全格局源地综合识别[J]. 生态学报, 33(13): 4125-4133. |
|
WU J S, ZHANG L Q, PENG J, et al., 2013. Comprehensive identification of source regions of landscape ecological security pattern in Shenzhen[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(13): 4125-4133.
DOI URL |
|
| [32] | 吴榛, 张凯云, 王浩, 2022. 城市扩张情景模拟下绿地生态网络构建与优化研究——以南京市部分区域为例[J]. 中国园林, 38(4): 56-61. |
| WU Z, ZHANG K Y, WANG H, 2022. Construction and optimization of green space ecological network under urban expansion scenario simulation: A case study of some areas in Nanjing[J]. Chinese Gardens, 38(4): 56-61. | |
| [33] | 许文雯, 孙翔, 朱晓东, 等, 2012. 基于生态网络分析的南京主城区重要生态斑块识别[J]. 生态学报, 32(4): 260-268. |
| XU W W, SUN X, ZHU X D, et al., 2012. Identification of important ecological patches in the main urban area of Nanjing based on ecological network analysis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(4): 260-268. | |
| [34] | 杨亮洁, 张玲玲, 张芳宁, 等, 2024. 生态安全格局视角下黄土高原生态网络韧性研究[J]. 生态学报, 44(22): 10471-10485. |
| YANG L J, ZHANG L L, ZHANG F N, et al., 2024. A study on the resilience of ecological networks on the Loess Plateau from the perspective of ecological security patterns[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44(22): 10471-10485. | |
| [35] | 张启舜, 李飞雪, 王帝文, 等, 2021. 基于生态网络的江苏省生态空间连通性变化研究[J]. 生态学报, 41(8): 3007-3020. |
| ZHANG Q S, LI F X, WANG D W, et al., 2021. A study on the changes of ecological space connectivity in Jiangsu Province based on ecological networks[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(8): 3007-3020. | |
| [36] | 张玥, 许端阳, 李霞, 等, 2020. 中-老交通走廊核心区生态廊道构建与关键节点识别[J]. 生态学报, 40(6): 1933-1943. |
| ZHANG Y, XU D Y, LI X, et al., 2020. Construction of ecological corridors and identification of key nodes in the core area of China - Laos transport corridor[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(6): 1933-1943. |
| [1] | FENG Yilong, HE Meng, LI Bo, LEI Jie, AI Lijiao. Construction and Optimization of Urban Ecological Network in Chongqing Main Urban Area [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(5): 699-709. |
| [2] | TAO Dekai, ZHANG Zijian. A Study on the Coupling and Synergistic Relationship between the Level of Territorial Space Green Development and Ecosystem Services in Jiangsu Province [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(2): 181-196. |
| [3] | ZHANG Wen, ZHENG Tian, LIU Yongchao, ZHONG Jie, SU Jie, LI Jialin. Identification of Key Areas for Ecological Protection and Restoration in Zhejiang Province Based on Circuit Theory [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(9): 1482-1494. |
| [4] | XU Jing, LIAO Xingkai, GAN Qixu, ZHOU Maoxian. Construction of Ecological Security Pattern Based on MSPA and Circuit Theory in Gansu Section of the Yellow River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(4): 805-813. |
| [5] | CAI Guojun, YUAN Guixiang, FU Hui. Status and Trends on Ecological Networks Research: A Review Based on Bibliometric Analysis [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 31(8): 1690-1699. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn