Ecology and Environmental Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 743-753.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2025.05.008
• Research Article【Environmental Science】 • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Jiadong1(), ZHANG Peng2, GUO Jianchao1,*(
), QI Shi2, LU Xudong2, ZUO Qin1, WU Hui1, CHEN Yizhuang1
Received:
2024-09-29
Online:
2025-05-18
Published:
2025-05-16
陈家东1(), 张鹏2, 郭建超1,*(
), 齐实2, 卢旭东2, 左琴1, 吴慧1, 陈益壮1
通讯作者:
*郭建超。E-mail: 作者简介:
陈家东(1976年生),男,高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向为小流域综合治理、水工结构等。E-mail: chenjdhnsy@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
CHEN Jiadong, ZHANG Peng, GUO Jianchao, QI Shi, LU Xudong, ZUO Qin, WU Hui, CHEN Yizhuang. Study on the Function Zoning and Function Matching Level with Control Measures of Eco-environment Friendly Small Watersheds in Hainan Island[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(5): 743-753.
陈家东, 张鹏, 郭建超, 齐实, 卢旭东, 左琴, 吴慧, 陈益壮. 海南岛生态清洁小流域功能分区与治理措施功能匹配性研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(5): 743-753.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2025.05.008
名称 | 来源文件 | 来源 |
---|---|---|
海南省主体功能分区图 | 《海南省国土空间规划(2021-2035年)》 | https://www.hainan.gov.cn/ |
海南省陆域环境管控单元分布图 | 《关于海南省“三线一单”生态环境分区管控的实施意见》 | https://www.hainan.gov.cn/ |
水土保持区划图 | 《海南省水土保持规划(2016-2030年)》 | http://swt.hainan.gov.cn/ |
海南岛DEM | ‒ | https://www.gscloud.cn/ |
海南岛水系图 | ‒ | https://www.slsd.com.cn/ |
42条生态清洁小流域实施方案 | ‒ | https://www.slsd.com.cn/ |
乡镇行政边界 | ‒ | https://www.slsd.com.cn/ |
Table 1 Data sources information
名称 | 来源文件 | 来源 |
---|---|---|
海南省主体功能分区图 | 《海南省国土空间规划(2021-2035年)》 | https://www.hainan.gov.cn/ |
海南省陆域环境管控单元分布图 | 《关于海南省“三线一单”生态环境分区管控的实施意见》 | https://www.hainan.gov.cn/ |
水土保持区划图 | 《海南省水土保持规划(2016-2030年)》 | http://swt.hainan.gov.cn/ |
海南岛DEM | ‒ | https://www.gscloud.cn/ |
海南岛水系图 | ‒ | https://www.slsd.com.cn/ |
42条生态清洁小流域实施方案 | ‒ | https://www.slsd.com.cn/ |
乡镇行政边界 | ‒ | https://www.slsd.com.cn/ |
匹配性等级 | 结果描述 |
---|---|
高 | Z>0.8,各项措施设计和投资都是围绕所在功能分区的功能定位进行 |
较高 | 0.60<Z≤0.8,各项措施设计和投资绝大多数围绕其所在分区的功能定位进行 |
中等 | 0.40<Z≤0.60,各项措施设计小部分措施设计和投资围绕所在分区功能定位 |
较低 | 0.20<Z≤0.40,各项措施设计和投资少部分围绕其所在功能分区功能定位进行 |
低 | Z≤0.20,各项措施设计和投资极少部分围绕其所在功能分区功能定位进行 |
Table 2 Functional compatibility level
匹配性等级 | 结果描述 |
---|---|
高 | Z>0.8,各项措施设计和投资都是围绕所在功能分区的功能定位进行 |
较高 | 0.60<Z≤0.8,各项措施设计和投资绝大多数围绕其所在分区的功能定位进行 |
中等 | 0.40<Z≤0.60,各项措施设计小部分措施设计和投资围绕所在分区功能定位 |
较低 | 0.20<Z≤0.40,各项措施设计和投资少部分围绕其所在功能分区功能定位进行 |
低 | Z≤0.20,各项措施设计和投资极少部分围绕其所在功能分区功能定位进行 |
功能分区 | 功能定位 | 总面积/ km2 | 比例/ % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
水源涵养 | 以保护河源区、重要水源区为目标 | 8923.66 | 25.9 | |
生态保护 | 以保护生态-水环境为目标,促进旅游资源合理开发 | 5702.77 | 16.6 | |
休闲康养 | 以完善基础设施建设、保护环境为目标 | 3611.88 | 10.5 | |
绿色农产 | 以改造农业生产设施条件为目标,提升农产品品质 | 12789.42 | 37.2 | |
和谐宜居 | 以改善人居环境为目标,促进生态乡村建设 | 3402.51 | 9.9 | |
总计 | 34430.23 | 100.0 |
Table 3 Function zoning table of eco-environment friendly small watersheds in Hainan Island
功能分区 | 功能定位 | 总面积/ km2 | 比例/ % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
水源涵养 | 以保护河源区、重要水源区为目标 | 8923.66 | 25.9 | |
生态保护 | 以保护生态-水环境为目标,促进旅游资源合理开发 | 5702.77 | 16.6 | |
休闲康养 | 以完善基础设施建设、保护环境为目标 | 3611.88 | 10.5 | |
绿色农产 | 以改造农业生产设施条件为目标,提升农产品品质 | 12789.42 | 37.2 | |
和谐宜居 | 以改善人居环境为目标,促进生态乡村建设 | 3402.51 | 9.9 | |
总计 | 34430.23 | 100.0 |
类型 | 生态清洁小流域名称 | 个数 |
---|---|---|
水源涵养分区 | 同甲、毛祥、红合、石门、青梯 | 5 |
生态保护分区 | 那柏、中洞、烟园、红雅、太平、番香、畅好、汀洲、岭寨、流溪 | 10 |
休闲康养分区 | 薛宅、儒扬、仙还、春坡、颜村 | 5 |
绿色农产分区 | 博贤、兰栋、龙潭、文贤、牙炮、永灵、田尾、寨脚、多福、水冲坡、加来、文柏、侍郎、屋基、文德、冰镰、学兰、安龙、加桐、戈枕、 | 20 |
和谐宜居分区 | 大坡、名山 | 2 |
Table 4 Statistical table of eco-environment friendly small watersheds built in different function zones of Hainan Province
类型 | 生态清洁小流域名称 | 个数 |
---|---|---|
水源涵养分区 | 同甲、毛祥、红合、石门、青梯 | 5 |
生态保护分区 | 那柏、中洞、烟园、红雅、太平、番香、畅好、汀洲、岭寨、流溪 | 10 |
休闲康养分区 | 薛宅、儒扬、仙还、春坡、颜村 | 5 |
绿色农产分区 | 博贤、兰栋、龙潭、文贤、牙炮、永灵、田尾、寨脚、多福、水冲坡、加来、文柏、侍郎、屋基、文德、冰镰、学兰、安龙、加桐、戈枕、 | 20 |
和谐宜居分区 | 大坡、名山 | 2 |
措施 | 流域名称 (编号) | 重要措施投资/万元 | 次要措施投资/万元 | 重要措施投资占比/% | 次要措施投资占比/% | 标准化后Z值 | 匹配性等级 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水源涵养分区 | 同甲(1) | 694.4 | 52.7 | 93.0 | 7.0 | 0.84 | 高 |
毛祥(2) | 349.8 | 32.4 | 91.5 | 8.5 | 0.84 | 高 | |
红合(3) | 292.2 | 0.0 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.90 | 高 | |
石门(4) | 3.3 | 373.9 | 0.9 | 99.1 | 0.10 | 低 | |
青梯(5) | 272.9 | 0.0 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.90 | 高 | |
生态保护分区 | 那柏(6) | 351.0 | 78.6 | 81.7 | 18.3 | 0.76 | 较高 |
番香(7) | 173.3 | 104.3 | 62.4 | 37.6 | 0.60 | 中等 | |
畅好(8) | 74.9 | 225.9 | 24.9 | 75.1 | 0.30 | 较低 | |
红雅(9) | 107.0 | 0.0 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.90 | 高 | |
太平(10) | 41.7 | 0.0 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.90 | 高 | |
中洞(11) | 2.2 | 171.4 | 1.3 | 98.7 | 0.12 | 低 | |
烟园(12) | 533.2 | 256.6 | 67.5 | 32.5 | 0.64 | 较高 | |
岭寨(13) | 251.3 | 224.3 | 52.8 | 47.2 | 0.52 | 中等 | |
汀洲(14) | 312.2 | 140.2 | 69.0 | 31.0 | 0.66 | 较高 | |
流溪(15) | 235.6 | 61.9 | 79.2 | 20.8 | 0.74 | 较高 | |
休闲康养分区 | 春坡(16) | 301.6 | 83.8 | 78.3 | 21.7 | 0.72 | 较高 |
颜村(17) | 188.0 | 66.5 | 73.9 | 26.1 | 0.70 | 较高 | |
仙还(18) | 690.6 | 344.4 | 66.7 | 33.3 | 0.64 | 较高 | |
薛宅(19) | 740.6 | 32.4 | 95.8 | 4.2 | 0.86 | 高 | |
儒扬(20) | 168.5 | 133.2 | 55.8 | 44.2 | 0.54 | 中等 | |
绿色农产分区 | 博贤(21) | 119.1 | 332.0 | 26.4 | 73.6 | 0.32 | 较低 |
兰栋(22) | 143.8 | 803.7 | 15.2 | 84.8 | 0.22 | 较低 | |
龙潭(23) | 82.8 | 712.2 | 10.4 | 89.6 | 0.18 | 低 | |
文贤(24) | 143.8 | 803.7 | 15.2 | 84.8 | 0.22 | 较低 | |
牙炮(25) | 264.6 | 240.2 | 52.4 | 47.6 | 0.52 | 中等 | |
永灵(26) | 67.3 | 339.1 | 16.5 | 83.5 | 0.24 | 较低 | |
田尾(27) | 21.7 | 419.4 | 4.9 | 95.1 | 0.14 | 低 | |
寨脚(28) | 119.3 | 251.5 | 32.2 | 67.8 | 0.36 | 较低 | |
多福(29) | 245.6 | 382.4 | 39.1 | 60.9 | 0.42 | 中等 | |
水冲坡(30) | 9.1 | 170.8 | 5.1 | 94.9 | 0.14 | 低 | |
加来(31) | 20.0 | 432.3 | 4.4 | 95.6 | 0.14 | 低 | |
文柏(32) | 102.7 | 128.9 | 44.3 | 55.7 | 0.46 | 中等 | |
安龙(33) | 236.5 | 30.3 | 88.6 | 11.4 | 0.80 | 较高 | |
学兰(34) | 382.2 | 21.4 | 94.7 | 5.3 | 0.86 | 高 | |
屋基(35) | 368.0 | 143.6 | 71.9 | 28.1 | 0.68 | 较高 | |
文德(36) | 525.8 | 335.6 | 61.0 | 39.0 | 0.58 | 中等 | |
侍郎(37) | 454.6 | 242.3 | 65.2 | 34.8 | 0.62 | 较高 | |
加桐(38) | 166.4 | 91.8 | 64.4 | 35.6 | 0.62 | 较高 | |
戈枕(39) | 158.7 | 112.8 | 58.5 | 41.5 | 0.56 | 中等 | |
冰镰(40) | 670.3 | 320.9 | 67.6 | 32.4 | 0.64 | 较高 | |
和谐宜居分区 | 大坡(41) | 82.4 | 185.0 | 30.8 | 69.2 | 0.34 | 较低 |
名山(42) | 721.0 | 108.2 | 86.9 | 13.1 | 0.80 | 较高 |
Table 5 Matching level of 42 eco-environment friendly small watersheds
措施 | 流域名称 (编号) | 重要措施投资/万元 | 次要措施投资/万元 | 重要措施投资占比/% | 次要措施投资占比/% | 标准化后Z值 | 匹配性等级 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水源涵养分区 | 同甲(1) | 694.4 | 52.7 | 93.0 | 7.0 | 0.84 | 高 |
毛祥(2) | 349.8 | 32.4 | 91.5 | 8.5 | 0.84 | 高 | |
红合(3) | 292.2 | 0.0 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.90 | 高 | |
石门(4) | 3.3 | 373.9 | 0.9 | 99.1 | 0.10 | 低 | |
青梯(5) | 272.9 | 0.0 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.90 | 高 | |
生态保护分区 | 那柏(6) | 351.0 | 78.6 | 81.7 | 18.3 | 0.76 | 较高 |
番香(7) | 173.3 | 104.3 | 62.4 | 37.6 | 0.60 | 中等 | |
畅好(8) | 74.9 | 225.9 | 24.9 | 75.1 | 0.30 | 较低 | |
红雅(9) | 107.0 | 0.0 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.90 | 高 | |
太平(10) | 41.7 | 0.0 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.90 | 高 | |
中洞(11) | 2.2 | 171.4 | 1.3 | 98.7 | 0.12 | 低 | |
烟园(12) | 533.2 | 256.6 | 67.5 | 32.5 | 0.64 | 较高 | |
岭寨(13) | 251.3 | 224.3 | 52.8 | 47.2 | 0.52 | 中等 | |
汀洲(14) | 312.2 | 140.2 | 69.0 | 31.0 | 0.66 | 较高 | |
流溪(15) | 235.6 | 61.9 | 79.2 | 20.8 | 0.74 | 较高 | |
休闲康养分区 | 春坡(16) | 301.6 | 83.8 | 78.3 | 21.7 | 0.72 | 较高 |
颜村(17) | 188.0 | 66.5 | 73.9 | 26.1 | 0.70 | 较高 | |
仙还(18) | 690.6 | 344.4 | 66.7 | 33.3 | 0.64 | 较高 | |
薛宅(19) | 740.6 | 32.4 | 95.8 | 4.2 | 0.86 | 高 | |
儒扬(20) | 168.5 | 133.2 | 55.8 | 44.2 | 0.54 | 中等 | |
绿色农产分区 | 博贤(21) | 119.1 | 332.0 | 26.4 | 73.6 | 0.32 | 较低 |
兰栋(22) | 143.8 | 803.7 | 15.2 | 84.8 | 0.22 | 较低 | |
龙潭(23) | 82.8 | 712.2 | 10.4 | 89.6 | 0.18 | 低 | |
文贤(24) | 143.8 | 803.7 | 15.2 | 84.8 | 0.22 | 较低 | |
牙炮(25) | 264.6 | 240.2 | 52.4 | 47.6 | 0.52 | 中等 | |
永灵(26) | 67.3 | 339.1 | 16.5 | 83.5 | 0.24 | 较低 | |
田尾(27) | 21.7 | 419.4 | 4.9 | 95.1 | 0.14 | 低 | |
寨脚(28) | 119.3 | 251.5 | 32.2 | 67.8 | 0.36 | 较低 | |
多福(29) | 245.6 | 382.4 | 39.1 | 60.9 | 0.42 | 中等 | |
水冲坡(30) | 9.1 | 170.8 | 5.1 | 94.9 | 0.14 | 低 | |
加来(31) | 20.0 | 432.3 | 4.4 | 95.6 | 0.14 | 低 | |
文柏(32) | 102.7 | 128.9 | 44.3 | 55.7 | 0.46 | 中等 | |
安龙(33) | 236.5 | 30.3 | 88.6 | 11.4 | 0.80 | 较高 | |
学兰(34) | 382.2 | 21.4 | 94.7 | 5.3 | 0.86 | 高 | |
屋基(35) | 368.0 | 143.6 | 71.9 | 28.1 | 0.68 | 较高 | |
文德(36) | 525.8 | 335.6 | 61.0 | 39.0 | 0.58 | 中等 | |
侍郎(37) | 454.6 | 242.3 | 65.2 | 34.8 | 0.62 | 较高 | |
加桐(38) | 166.4 | 91.8 | 64.4 | 35.6 | 0.62 | 较高 | |
戈枕(39) | 158.7 | 112.8 | 58.5 | 41.5 | 0.56 | 中等 | |
冰镰(40) | 670.3 | 320.9 | 67.6 | 32.4 | 0.64 | 较高 | |
和谐宜居分区 | 大坡(41) | 82.4 | 185.0 | 30.8 | 69.2 | 0.34 | 较低 |
名山(42) | 721.0 | 108.2 | 86.9 | 13.1 | 0.80 | 较高 |
措施分区 | 措施名称 | 措施投资/万元 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿色 农产型 | 水源涵养型 | 生态保护型 | 休闲康养型 | 和谐宜居型 | ||
预防保护区 | 封育 | 50.74 | 3.46 | 8.30 | 12.84 | 8.54 |
低效林改造 | 421.43 | 0.00 | 13.35 | 177.93 | 32.49 | |
退化林修复 | 19.67 | 3.99 | 16.32 | 2.20 | 1.30 | |
综合治理区 | 坡面水系工程 | 151.37 | 49.05 | 140.01 | 30.93 | 0.00 |
节水灌溉 | 225.75 | 0.00 | 41.55 | 133.21 | 0.00 | |
生产道路建设 | 1492.45 | 32.45 | 952.60 | 457.16 | 182.63 | |
种草 | 360.62 | 19.00 | 147.93 | 47.54 | 32.82 | |
保土耕作 | 14.30 | 5.79 | 5.22 | 4.12 | 0.00 | |
土(园)地 整治 | 18.96 | 29.86 | 74.55 | 14.01 | 0.00 | |
农田生态沟渠 | 85.24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
水土保持林 | 48.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
梯田 | 206.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
生态修复区 | 村庄整治工程 | 3824.06 | 281.58 | 663.46 | 938.21 | 336.14 |
溪沟整治工程 | 1173.94 | 1129.82 | 1053.87 | 346.34 | 0.00 | |
村庄美化工程 | 1117.07 | 253.80 | 171.21 | 245.44 | 37.84 | |
人工湿地 | 402.91 | 0.00 | 9.67 | 324.87 | 0.00 | |
护岸工程 | 980.47 | 262.67 | 47.47 | 0.00 | 464.84 | |
湖塘绿化 | 24.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 14.67 | 0.00 | |
总计 | ‒ | 10617.35 | 2071.47 | 3345.51 | 2749.47 | 1096.60 |
次要措施投资 | 8033.28 | 87.29 | 999.37 | 625.42 | 216.42 | |
重要措施投资 | 2584.07 | 1984.18 | 2346.14 | 2124.05 | 880.18 | |
次要措施投资占比/% | 75.7 | 4.2 | 29.9 | 22.8 | 19.7 | |
重要措施投资占比/% | 24.3 | 95.8 | 70.1 | 77.2 | 80.3 |
Table 6 Summary of investment in different measures for eco-environment friendly small watersheds built in different function zones
措施分区 | 措施名称 | 措施投资/万元 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿色 农产型 | 水源涵养型 | 生态保护型 | 休闲康养型 | 和谐宜居型 | ||
预防保护区 | 封育 | 50.74 | 3.46 | 8.30 | 12.84 | 8.54 |
低效林改造 | 421.43 | 0.00 | 13.35 | 177.93 | 32.49 | |
退化林修复 | 19.67 | 3.99 | 16.32 | 2.20 | 1.30 | |
综合治理区 | 坡面水系工程 | 151.37 | 49.05 | 140.01 | 30.93 | 0.00 |
节水灌溉 | 225.75 | 0.00 | 41.55 | 133.21 | 0.00 | |
生产道路建设 | 1492.45 | 32.45 | 952.60 | 457.16 | 182.63 | |
种草 | 360.62 | 19.00 | 147.93 | 47.54 | 32.82 | |
保土耕作 | 14.30 | 5.79 | 5.22 | 4.12 | 0.00 | |
土(园)地 整治 | 18.96 | 29.86 | 74.55 | 14.01 | 0.00 | |
农田生态沟渠 | 85.24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
水土保持林 | 48.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
梯田 | 206.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
生态修复区 | 村庄整治工程 | 3824.06 | 281.58 | 663.46 | 938.21 | 336.14 |
溪沟整治工程 | 1173.94 | 1129.82 | 1053.87 | 346.34 | 0.00 | |
村庄美化工程 | 1117.07 | 253.80 | 171.21 | 245.44 | 37.84 | |
人工湿地 | 402.91 | 0.00 | 9.67 | 324.87 | 0.00 | |
护岸工程 | 980.47 | 262.67 | 47.47 | 0.00 | 464.84 | |
湖塘绿化 | 24.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 14.67 | 0.00 | |
总计 | ‒ | 10617.35 | 2071.47 | 3345.51 | 2749.47 | 1096.60 |
次要措施投资 | 8033.28 | 87.29 | 999.37 | 625.42 | 216.42 | |
重要措施投资 | 2584.07 | 1984.18 | 2346.14 | 2124.05 | 880.18 | |
次要措施投资占比/% | 75.7 | 4.2 | 29.9 | 22.8 | 19.7 | |
重要措施投资占比/% | 24.3 | 95.8 | 70.1 | 77.2 | 80.3 |
[1] | BI H, LIU Q, 2001. Desertification and re-afforestation of the coastal land in Changjiang County, Hainan Island[J]. Chinese Journal of Geochemistry, 20(4): 374. |
[2] | BULLEY H N, MERCHANT J W, MARX D B, et al., 2007. A Gis-based approach to watershed classification for Nebraska reservoirs[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(3): 605-621. |
[3] | CHEN J P, ZHANG D S, CHEN Z, et al., 2022. Effect of agricultural social services on green production of natural rubber: Evidence from Hainan, China[J]. Sustainability, 14(21): 14138. |
[4] | GIESBRECHT I, TANK S E, FRAZER G W, et al., 2022. Watershed classification predicts streamflow regime and organic carbon dynamics in the Northeast Pacific coastal temperate rainforest[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 36(2): e2021GB007047. |
[5] | KANISHKA G, ELDHO T I, 2020. Streamflow estimation in ungauged basins using watershed classification and regionalization techniques[J]. Journal of Earth System Science, 129: 1-18. |
[6] | MAYER A, WINKLER R, FRY L, 2014. Classification of watersheds into integrated social and biophysical indicators with clustering analysis[J]. Ecological Indicators, 45: 340-349. |
[7] | RAZAVI T, COULIBALY P, 2013. Classification of Ontario watersheds based on physical attributes and streamflow series[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 493: 81-94. |
[8] | SHEN Z Y, ZHONG Y C, HUANG Q, et al., 2015. Identifying non-point source priority management areas in watersheds with multiple functional zones[J]. Water Research, 68: 563-571. |
[9] |
TRABUCCHI M, NTSHOTSHO P, O'FARRELL P, et al., 2012. Ecosystem service trends in basin-scale restoration initiatives: A review[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 111: 18-23.
DOI PMID |
[10] | WALKE N, REDDY G O, MAJI A K, et al., 2012. GIS-based multicriteria overlay analysis in soil-suitability evaluation for cotton (Gossypium spp.): A case study in the black soil region of central India[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 41: 108-118. |
[11] | WANG T T, TANG W Q, WU D H, et al., 2023. Abundance and characteristics of microplastics in the Wanquan River estuary, Hainan Island[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 189: 114810. |
[12] | WU Y F, XU H G, LEW A A, 2015. Consumption-led mobilized urbanism: socio-spatial separation in the second-home city of Sanya[J]. Mobilities, 10(1): 136-154. |
[13] | YUAN X J, OUYANG H, LIN L F, 2021. Preliminary study on the brand construction of tropical agriculture against the background of we-media: A case study of Chinese academy of tropical agricultural sciences[J]. CONVERTER, 2021: 350-355. |
[14] | ZHANG A, YANG Y Q, CHEN T Y, et al., 2021. Exploration of spatial differentiation patterns and related influencing factors for National Key Villages for rural tourism in China in the context of a rural revitalization strategy, using GIS-based overlay analysis[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(2): 1-15. |
[15] |
ZHU S L, CHEN W T, WU Z, et al., 2023. Mitochondrial diversity and genetic structure of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) in Pearl River and Nandujiang River[J]. Journal of Fish Biology, 102(5): 1109-1120.
DOI PMID |
[16] | 包凤轩, 陈宁, 王楠, 等, 2024. 基于隶属函数法鉴定抗寒苜蓿种质苗期耐苏打盐碱性[J/OL]. 草地学报, 1-14 [2024-12-10]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3362.S.20240911.1956.004.html. |
BAO F X, CHEN N, WANG N, et al., 2024. Identification of soda saline-alkali tolerance of cold-resistant alfalfa germplasm at seedling stage based on membership function method[J/OL]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 1-14 [2024-12-10]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3362.S.20240911.1956.004.html. | |
[17] |
郭曼曼, 路旭, 马青, 2022. 小流域视角下生态-经济价值评估及补偿机制——以辽宁庄河市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 37(11): 2884-2897.
DOI |
GUO M M, LU X, MA Q, 2022. Study on eco-economic value evaluation and compensation from the perspective of small watershed: A case study of Zhuanghe city in Liaoning province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 37(11): 2884-2897. | |
[18] | 海南省统计局, 国家统计局海南调查总队, 2023. 海南统计年鉴(2023)[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社. |
Hainan Provincial Bureau of Statistics, National Bureau of Statistics Hainan Survey Corps, 2023. Hainan statistical yearbook (2023)[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press. | |
[19] | 韩念龙, 刘子荣, 贾培宏, 等, 2022. 1996-2020年海南岛水源涵养量时空变化及地理探测[J]. 水土保持通报, 42(5): 193-201. |
HAN N L, LIU Z R, JIA P H, et al., 2022. Spatio-temporal changes and geographic detection of water conservation on Hainan Island from 1996 to 2020[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 42(5): 193-201. | |
[20] | 侯媛媛, 金丹, 金琰, 等, 2023. 海南农业产业聚集水平和区域比较分析[J]. 农业展望, 19(6): 45-52. |
HOU Y Y, JIN D, JIN Y, et al., 2023. Comparative analysis of agricultural industry agglomeration level and regions in Hainan[J]. Agricultural Outlook, 19(6): 45-52. | |
[21] | 黄勇, 齐实, 李学明, 等, 2007. 宁夏南部山区流域分类及其综合治理模式[J]. 水土保持研究, 14(3): 312-314, 317. |
HUANG Y, QI S, LI X M, et al., 2007. Watershed classification and It’s comprehensive management model on Loess Plateau area of southern Ningxia[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 14(3): 312-314, 317. | |
[22] | 赖如万, 袁明华, 2006. 兴国县水土保持重点治理项目投资成本与效益分析[J]. 水利发展研究 (6): 43-46. |
LAI R W, YUAN M H, 2006. Analysis of investment costs and benefits of key soil and water conservation treatment projects in Xingguo County[J]. Water Resources Development Research (6): 43-46. | |
[23] | 李栋, 吴博, 郑秀清, 等, 2017. 基于AHP和GIS的吕梁地区小流域山洪灾害风险区划[J]. 水电能源科学, 35(7): 85-88, 96. |
LI D, WU B, ZHENG X Q, et al., 2017. Risk regionalization of mountain torrent disaster in small watershed of Lvliang area based on AHP and GIS[J]. Water Resources and Power, 35(7): 85-88, 96. | |
[24] |
李裕瑞, 卜长利, 曹智, 等, 2020. 面向乡村振兴战略的村庄分类方法与实证研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 35(2): 243-256.
DOI |
LI Y R, BU C L, CAO Z, et al., 2020. Village classification system for rural vitalization strategy: Method and empirical study[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 35(2): 243-256. | |
[25] | 林郁, 2015. 海南省水土保持的现状及对策[J]. 中国水土保持 (3): 7-9. |
LIN Y, 2015. The current situation and countermeasures of soil and water conservation in Hainan Province[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China (3): 7-9. | |
[26] | 刘贤词, 王晓辉, 邢巧, 2010. 海南岛中部山区生态系统水源涵养功能研究[J]. 节水灌溉 (7): 65-66. |
LIU X C, WANG X H, XING Q, 2010. Study on water conservation function of ecosystem in central mountainous area of Hainan Island[J]. Water Saving Irrigation (7): 65-66. | |
[27] | 柳金杰, 2015. 河北省邢台县不同型式生态清洁小流域建设成效分析[J]. 地下水, 37(5): 172-173, 178. |
LIU J J, 2015. Effect analysis on different types of Eco-environment friendly small watersheds construction in Xingtai County of Hebei Province[J]. Ground Water, 37(5): 172-173, 178. | |
[28] | 马文鹏, 武晓峰, 段淑怀, 等, 2014. 北京山区小流域生态清洁程度分级研究[J]. 中国水土保持 (4): 27-31, 69. |
MA W P, WU X F, DUAN S H, et al., 2014. Classification of ecological clean levels of small watersheds in mountainous area of Beijing[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China (4): 27-31, 69. | |
[29] | 孟繁盛, 2019. 浅析辽宁省小流域水土流失综合治理投资的问题[J]. 水土保持应用技术 (3): 42-44. |
MENG F S, 2019. A brief analysis of the investment in comprehensive soil erosion control in small watersheds in Liaoning Province[J]. Technology of Soil and Water Conservation (3): 42-44. | |
[30] |
莫明浩, 谢颂华, 张磊, 等, 2018. 南方红壤侵蚀区生态清洁小流域评价研究——以江西省为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 27(6): 1016-1023.
DOI |
MO M H, XIE S H, ZHANG L, et al., 2018. Assessment of eco-clean small watersheds in the red-soil area of southern China, Jiangxi province[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 27(6): 1016-1023. | |
[31] | 宁虹雯, 吕本富, 2022. 历史文化资源IP化的价值实现路径研究——以海南儋州为例[J]. 管理评论, 34(5): 332-339. |
NING H W, LÜ B F, 2022. Research on the value path of historical and cultural resources based on IP design: Taking Danzhou, Hainan as an example[J]. Management Review, 34(5): 332-339. | |
[32] | 齐实, 李月, 2017. 小流域综合治理的国内外进展综述与思考[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 39(8): 1-8. |
QI S, LI Y, 2017. A review and thinking of comprehensive management of small watershed at home and abroad[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 39(8): 1-8. | |
[33] | 乔殿新, 2024. 新时代生态清洁小流域发展思考[J]. 中国水土保持 (2): 1-5, 75. |
QIAO D X, 2024. Thinking on the development of Ecological-clean Small Watersheds in the new era[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China (2): 1-5, 75. | |
[34] | 乔殿新, 王力, 郭莹莹, 2022. 论新阶段水土保持生态清洁小流域发展[J]. 中国水利 (14): 34-37. |
QIAO D X, WANG L, GUO Y Y, 2022. Discussion of the development of ecologically clean small watershed for soil and water conservation in the new stage[J]. China Water Resources (14): 34-37. | |
[35] | 乔殿新, 赵莹, 李天毅, 等, 2023. 《生态清洁小流域建设技术规范》解读[J]. 中国水土保持 (10): 17-20. |
QIAO D X, ZHAO Y, LI T Y, et al., 2023. Explanation on technical specifications for the construction of Ecological and Clean Small-watersheds[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China (10): 17-20. | |
[36] | 谭露, 杨逸辉, 张嫱, 等, 2024. 面向可持续发展的南京市小流域分类[J]. 江苏水利 (8): 37-42. |
TAN L, YANG Y H, ZHANG Q, et al., 2024. Classification of small watersheds in Nanjing for sustainable development[J]. Jiangsu Water Resources (8): 37-42. | |
[37] | 涂志华, 王海旺, 周柱栋, 等, 2022. 海南省水土保持率远期目标值研究[J]. 水土保持应用技术 (6): 1-4. |
TU Z H, WANG H W, ZHOU Z D, et al., 2022. Study on the long-term target value of soil and water conservation rate in Hainan Province[J]. Technology of Soil and Water Conservation (6): 1-4. | |
[38] | 汪粲, 2020. 海南小流域综合治理措施设计与思考[J]. 价值工程, 39(27): 7-8. |
WANG C, 2020. Design and reflection on comprehensive management measures of Hainan small basin[J]. Value Engineering, 39(27): 7-8. | |
[39] | 王海岗, 贾冠清, 智慧, 等, 2016. 谷子核心种质表型遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 42(1): 19-30. |
WANG H G, JIA G Q, ZHI H, et al., 2016. Phenotypic diversity evaluations of foxtail millet core collections[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 42(1): 19-30. | |
[40] | 王海燕, 丛佩娟, 袁普金, 等, 2021. 国家水土保持重点工程效益综合评价模型研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 41(6): 119-126. |
WANG H Y, CONG P J, YUAN P J, et al., 2021. Comprehensive evaluation model of national key project benefits of soil and water conservation[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 41(6): 119-126. | |
[41] | 王晶, 冯伟, 杨伟超, 等, 2018. 黄土高原区和南方红壤区小流域综合治理成本研究[J]. 中国水土保持 (10): 4-7. |
WANG J, FENG W, YANG W C, et al., 2018. Integrated control cost of small watersheds in the Loess Plateau region and the red soil region of south China[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China (10): 4-7. | |
[42] | 王礼先, 2006. 小流域综合治理的概念与原则[J]. 中国水土保持 (2): 16-17, 52. |
WANG L X, 2006. Concepts and principles of integrated small watershed management[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China (2): 16-17, 52. | |
[43] | 吴治玲, 2023. 基于材料市场价格变化的小流域综合治理水土保持投资敏感性分析[J]. 江西水利科技, 49(6): 443-447. |
WU Z L, 2023. Sensitivity analysis of water and soil conservation investment in comprehensive management of small watershed based on the change of material market price[J]. Jiangxi Hydraulic Science & Technology, 49(6): 443-447. | |
[44] | 肖娟花, 于兴修, 马方正, 等, 2020. 生态清洁小流域综合效益评价研究进展[J]. 中国水土保持 (3): 62-65. |
XIAO J H, YU X X, MA F H, et al., 2020. Progress of study on integrated benefit evaluation of ecological and clean-type small watersheds[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China (3): 62-65. | |
[45] | 肖茜, 韩力慧, 齐超楠, 等, 2024. 中国典型城市大气降水离子特性、来源及其对环境的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 44(10): 5329-5343. |
XIAO Q, HAN L H, QI C N, et al., 2024. Ionic characteristics and sources of atmospheric precipitation and its impacts on environment at typical cities in China[J]. China Environmental Science, 44(10): 5329-5343. | |
[46] | 杨坤, 李世荣, 2012. 北京市生态清洁小流域分类分级建设对策研究[J]. 中国水土保持 (2): 7-9, 68. |
YANG K, LI S R, 2012. Countermeasures for ecologic clean-type small watershed building by grade and classification in Beijing[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China (2): 7-9, 68. | |
[47] | 张利超, 谢颂华, 2018. 基于功能的江西省生态清洁小流域分类研究[J]. 中国水土保持 (1): 7-10. |
ZHANG L C, XIE S H, 2018. Classification of ecologically clean watersheds in Jiangxi Province based on function[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China (1): 7-10. | |
[48] | 张乾柱, 王彤彤, 卢阳, 等, 2019. 基于AHP-GIS的重庆市山洪灾害风险区划研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 28(1): 91-102. |
ZHANG Q Z, WANG T T, LU Y, et al., 2019. Regionalization of torrential flood disasters in Chongqing based on AHP-GIS[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 28(1): 91-102. | |
[49] | 张粤, 2021. 生态清洁小流域建设综合效益评价——以祁阳县容驷小流域为例[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学. |
ZHANG Y, 2021. Comprehensive benefit evaluation of ecological and clean small watershed construction: Takes Rongsi small basin in Qiyang County as an example[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology. | |
[50] | 张宇, 刘洪超, 王九九, 等, 2024. 东北黑土区小流域综合治理分类分级标准研究[J]. 中国水土保持 (3): 34-38. |
ZHANG Y, LIU H C, WANG J J, et al., 2024. Research on classification and grading standards for comprehensive management of small watersheds in the black soil region of northeast China[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China (3): 34-38. | |
[51] | 中华人民共和国水利部, 2023. 生态清洁小流域建设技术规范: SL/T 534—2023[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社: 34-35. |
Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China, 2023. Technical specification for construction of eco-environment friendly small watersheds: SL/T 534—2023[S]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press: 34-35. | |
[52] | 中华人民共和国水利部, 2013. 小流域划分及编码规范: SL653—2013[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社: 4-8. |
MInistry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China, 2023. Specification for division and coding of small watershed: SL 653—2013[S]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press: 4-8. | |
[53] | 中华人民共和国水利部, 2013. 生态清洁小流域建设技术导则: SL/T 534—2013[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社. |
Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China, 2023. Technical guidelines for construction of the ecological-clean small watersheds: SL/T 534—2013[S]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press. | |
[54] | 周智文, 2017. 重庆山洪沟治理优先度评价及防治措施体系研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学. |
ZHOU Z W, 2017. Studies on mountain torrent ditch governance priorityevaluation and control measures system in Chongqing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University. |
[1] | DONG Yuanhuo, CAI Fangtao, BAI Xueyi, SONG Chengyu, NING Tingting, XIONG Fei, ZENG Changli. Comparison of Chloroplast Sequences rbcL of the Endangered Ceratopteris shingii and C. thalictroides from Hainan Island in China, and Analysis of Cryptic Species of C. thalictroides [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(1): 28-34. |
[2] | WANG Yiquan, ZHOU Zhang, LI Yide, CHEN Dexiang, ZHANG Tao, YANG Fan. The Spatial-temporal Pattern and Influencing Factors of Negative Air Ions in Tropical Forests, Hainan, China [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 30(5): 898-906. |
[3] | LEI Jinrui, CHEN Zongzhu, CHEN Yiqing, CHEN Xiaohua, LI Yuanling, WU Tingtian. Dynamic Analysis of Wetland Landscape Ecological Security Pattern of Hainan Island in 1990‒2018 [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 29(2): 293-302. |
[4] | LEI Jinrui, CHEN Zongzhu, CHEN Yiqing, CHEN Xiaohua, LI Yuanling, WU Tingtian. Landscape Pattern Changes and Driving Factors Analysis of Wetland in Hainan Island during 1990-2018 [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 29(1): 59-70. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn