Response of Potamogeton crispus to Intense Radiation under Different Submergence Depths

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2024.05.006

Ecology and Environment ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 720-729.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2024.05.006

• Research Article [Ecology] • Previous Articles Next Articles

Response of Potamogeton crispus to Intense Radiation under Different Submergence Depths

WANG Jinqi^*(), SONG Yuzhi

School of Ecology and Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, P. R. China

Received:2024-03-27 Online:2024-05-18 Published:2024-06-27

不同淹没水深下菹草对强辐射的响应

王锦旗^*(), 宋玉芝

南京信息工程大学生态与应用气象学院，江苏南京 210044

通讯作者: *
作者简介:王锦旗（1976年生），副教授，博士，研究方向为大气环境因子对水生生态系统的影响。E-mail: w_j_q@sina.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42077303);江苏省基础研究计划（自然科学基金）(BK20220021)

Abstract

Abstract:

The decline of Potamogeton crispus in late spring and early summer is the focus of ecological water-restoration research. Intense radiation is a major factor contributing to the mortality of Potamogeton crispus. To investigate the resistance of P. crispus to intense radiation at different water depths, transparent fishing nets were used to push P. crispus plants to their corresponding underwater positions (10, 20, and 30 cm) by simulating intense radiation. Plant morphology, leaf area, fresh weight, chlorophyll mass fraction, and chlorophyll fluorescence were measured and the results were compared with those of the control group (without compression). The results showed that when the P. crispus plants were suppressed to a depth of 20 cm, the plant height, leaf area, weight per plant, and chlorophyll mass fraction were higher than those of the other treatments, whereas the various indicators of the control group were the lowest. The activity of the PSⅡ center was the strongest in all treatment groups, and the harmful effects of UV-B radiation were minimal. The PSⅡ reaction center of the plants in the control and 10-cm treatment groups was destroyed or reversibly inactivated, and the light energy conversion efficiency, light energy transfer rate, and electron transfer rate decreased. The PSⅡ reaction center of the plants was not damaged by 30 cm underwater, but photosynthetically active radiation could not meet the growth requirements of plants in deep water. Radiation had a significant effect on all monitoring indicators, with most indicators being simultaneously affected by water depth. The plant height, internode length, chlorophyll mass fraction, F_v/F_m, ϕ_PSⅡ, and q_P were also affected by their interactions. Therefore, 20 cm underwater could meet the growth requirements of P. crispus in this experiment because the attenuating effect of water reduced the UV-B radiation. The shielding effect of water is an effective method for minimizing damage. However, in natural waters, the depth of suppression is determined by the biologically effective optical depth of the UV-B radiation.

Key words: ultraviolet radiation, photosynthesis, morphology, chlorophyll mass fraction, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, biologically effective optical depth

摘要：

春末夏初菹草大批衰亡的原因一直是水体生态修复关注重点，强辐射被认为是最为重要的因素。为研究不同淹没水深下菹草对强辐射的抵御能力，通过模拟强辐射方式，用透明渔网将植株压迫至水下相应位置（10、20、30 cm），分别测定菹草形态、叶绿素质量分数及叶绿素荧光参数等变化，并与对照组（未压迫）比较。结果表明，压迫至水下20 cm处的植株在株高、叶面积、鲜物质量，以及叶绿素质量分数等指标均高于其他深度处理组，对照组各项指标最低；水下20 cm组PSⅡ中心活性最强，受强辐射中UV-B伤害最小，而对照组及水下10 cm处理组，受UV-B辐射后，其PSⅡ反应中心遭到破坏或可逆性失活，光能转换效率、光能传递能率以及电子传递速率下降；水下30 cm处理组，虽PSⅡ反应中心未遭到伤害，因光合有效辐射衰减，植株生长各项指标不及20 cm组。辐射对所有监测指标均有极显著影响，大部分指标同时受水深因素影响；株高、节间距、叶绿素质量分数及F_v/F_m、ϕ_PSⅡ、q_P还受两者交互影响。该试验中，水下20 cm既可抵御有害辐射，光合有效辐射也能满足植株生长。因此，利用水体自身屏蔽作用，通过压迫方式可有效削减强辐射中有害辐射对菹草的伤害，是一种简单易行的方式，在自然水体中可参考UV-B生物有效光学深度来确定压迫深度。

关键词: 紫外辐射, 菹草, 形态, 叶绿素质量分数, 叶绿素荧光参数, 生物有效光学深度

CLC Number:

Q14
X173

WANG Jinqi, SONG Yuzhi. Response of Potamogeton crispus to Intense Radiation under Different Submergence Depths[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(5): 720-729.

王锦旗, 宋玉芝. 不同淹没水深下菹草对强辐射的响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(5): 720-729.

Figures/Tables 7

References 24

[1]	KUWAHARA V S, NAKAJIMA R, OTHMAN B H R, et al., 2010. Spatial variability of UVR attenuation and biooptical factors in shallow coralreef waters of Malaysia[J]. Coral Reefs, 29(3): 693-704.
[2]	LIN Q, LIU B, MIN F, et al., 2017. Effects of aluminate flocculant on turion germination and seedling growth of Potamogeton crispus[J]. Aquatic Toxicology, 193: 236-244.
[3]	OVERMANS S, DUARTE C M, SOBRINO C, et al., 2022. Penetration of ultraviolet-b radiation in oligotrophic regions of the oceans during the malaspina 2010 expedition[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 127(5): 1-21.
[4]	ROGERS K H, BREEEN C M, 1988. Growth and reproduction of Potamogeton crispus L. in a South Africa lake[J]. Journal of Ecology, 68(2): 561-571.
[5]	WANG J Q, SONG Y Z, 2023. Effect of UV-B radiation on morphological plasticity, foraging responses and turion of Potamogeton crispus[J]. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 21(2): 1389-1407.
[6]	WANG G H, HAO Z J, ANKEN R H, et al., 2010. Effects of UV-B radiation on photosynthesis activity of Wolffia arrhiza as probed by chlorophyll fluorescence transients[J]. Advances in Space Research, 45(7): 839-845.
[7]	WANG J Q, SONG Y Z, XUE Y, 2020. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of curly pondweed (Potamogeton crispus L.) to UV-B radiation stress[J]. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 18(4): 5383-5397.
[8]	XU Z G, LI B Q, LI X, et al., 2023. Effects of UV radiation on photosynthesis of Sargassum muticum[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 569: 151961.
[9]	陈正勇, 王国祥, 吴晓东, 等, 2011. 不同水深条件下菹草 (Potamogeton crispus) 的适应对策[J]. 湖泊科学, 23(6): 942-948.
	CHEN Z Y, WANG G X, WU X D, et al., 2011. Ecological adaptability of Potamogeton crispus under different water depths[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 23(6): 942-948.
[10]	崔岩, 刘海燕, 李武阳, 等, 2023. 固定化培养中氮磷浓度对钝顶螺旋藻生长及其代谢产物和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 43(1): 136-146.
	CUI Y, LIU H Y, LI W Y, et al., 2023. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorous concentrations on growth, metabolites and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of immobilized Spirulina platensis[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 43(1): 136-146.
[11]	丁俊男, 王慧, 于少鹏, 2022. 叶绿素荧光分析技术在野生植物响应多环芳烃(菲)胁迫的应用研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 42(7): 2207-2212.
	DING J N, WANG H, YU S P, 2022. Application of rapid fluorescence analysis technology on study on Glycine soja response to PAHs (Phenanthrene)[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 42(7): 2207-2212.
[12]	韩燕青, 刘鑫, 胡维平, 等, 2017. CO₂浓度升高对苦草 (Vallisneria natans) 叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 植物研究, 37(1): 47-53.
	HAN Y Q, LIU X, HU W P, et al., 2017. Effects of CO₂ enrichment on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of Vallisneria natans[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 37(1): 47-53.
[13]	金送笛, 李永函, 1991. 几种生态因子对菹草光合作用的影响[J]. 水生生物学报, 15(4): 295-302.
	JIN S D, LI Y H, 1991. Effects of ecological factors on photosynthesis of Potamogeton crispus[J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 15(4): 295-302.
[14]	潘越, 郭靖, 张浩, 等, 2022. 干旱环境下山葡萄光合和叶绿素荧光参数比较[J]. 西北农业学报, 31(11):1435-1442.
	PAN Y, GUO J, ZHANG H, et al., 2022. Comparison of photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Vitis amurensis Rupr. under arid environment[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica Acta, 31(11): 1435-1442.
[15]	苏胜齐, 沈盎绿, 唐洪玉, 等, 2001. 温度光照和pH对菹草光合作用的影响[J]. 西南农业大学学报, 23(6): 532-534.
	SU S Q, SHEN Y L, TANG H Y, et al., 2001. Effects of temperature, light intensity and pH on photosynthesis in Potamogeton crispus L.[J]. Joumal of Southwest Agricultural Univenity, 23(6): 532-534.
[16]	王锦旗, 刘燕, 薛艳, 等, 2015a. 紫外辐射对菹草成株表型可塑性及石芽的影响[J]. 生态学报, 35(18): 5984-5991.
	WANG J Q, LIU Y, XUE Y, et al., 2015a. Effect of ultraviolet radiation on phenotypic plasticity and turion of Potamogeton crispus[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(18): 5984-5991.
[17]	王锦旗, 郑有飞, 薛艳, 2015b. 紫外辐射对菹草成株生理特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 35(18): 5975-5983.
	WANG J Q, ZHENG Y F, XUE Y, 2015b. Influence of ultraviolet radiation on physiological characteristics of Potamogeton crispus[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(18): 5975-5983.
[18]	王锦旗, 郑有飞, 薛艳, 2015c. UV-B辐射对菹草成株叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 34(7): 1898-1904.
	WANG J Q, ZHENG Y F, XUE Y, 2015c. Effects of ultraviolet-B radiation on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Potamogeton crispus[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 34(7): 1898-1904.
[19]	王锦旗, 宋玉芝, 薛艳, 2015d. 紫外辐射对菹草成株快速光响应曲线的影响[J]. 湖泊科学, 27(3): 451-458.
	WANG J Q, SONG Y Z, XUE Y, 2015d. Effects of ultraviolet radiation on rapid light-response curves of Potamogeton crispus[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 27(3): 451-458.
[20]	谢永宏, 于丹, 耿显华, 2003. CO₂浓度升高对沉水植物菹草叶表型及生理生化特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 27(2): 218-212. DOI
	XIE Y H, YU D, GEN X H, 2003. Effects of elevated con concentration on phenotypic, physiological and biochemical characteristics of submersed plant Potamogeton crispus leaf[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 27(2): 218-212.
[21]	徐伟伟, 胡维平, 邓建才, 等, 2015. 菹草生物量控制对群落中沉水植物生长及水质的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 24(7): 1222-1227. DOI
	XU W W, HU W P, DENG J C, et al., 2015. Influence of harvesting Potamogeton crispus in a submerged plant community on the growth of submerged aquatic plants and their effects on water quality[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 24(7): 1222-1227.
[22]	张卫强, 黄芳芳, 甘先华, 等, 2020. 遮阴和盐分对银叶树幼苗光合特性与叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 29(3): 438-446. DOI
	ZHANG W Q, HUANG F F, GAN X H, 2020. Effects of shade and salt on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of Heritiera littoralis seedling[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 29(3): 438-446.
[23]	张运林, 秦伯强, 马荣华, 等, 2005. 太湖典型草、藻型湖区紫外辐射的衰减及影响因素分析[J]. 生态学报, 25(9): 2354-2361.
	ZHANG Y L, QIN B Q, MA R H, et al., 2005. Attenuation of solar ultraviolet radiation and analysis of attenuators in typical macrophytic, algal lake zones of Lake Taihu[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 25(9): 2354-2361.
[24]	周晓红, 王国祥, 冯冰冰, 2008. 光照对菹草 (Potamogeton cripus) 幼苗生长发育和光合荧光特性的影响[J]. 生态环境, 17(4): 1342-1347.
	ZHOU X H, WANG G X, FENG B B, 2008. Infuence of the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Potamogeton cripus in light[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 17(4): 1342-1347.

辐射波段	株高	节间距	叶面积	鲜物质量	Chla	Chlb	F_v/F_m	F_v/F_o	ϕ_PSⅡ	q_P
UV-B	−0.58*	−0.75**	−0.28	−0.51	−0.89**	−0.88**	−0.89**	−0.90**	−0.64*	−0.44
UV-A	−0.61*	−0.75**	−0.31	−0.53	−0.82**	−0.81**	−0.87**	−0.86**	−0.56	−0.35
PAR	−0.45	−0.69**	−0.21	−0.48	−0.89**	−0.87**	−0.85**	−0.87**	−0.61*	−0.42

辐射波段	株高	节间距	叶面积	鲜物质量	Chla	Chlb	F_v/F_m	F_v/F_o	ϕ_PSⅡ	q_P
UV-B	−0.58*	−0.75**	−0.28	−0.51	−0.89**	−0.88**	−0.89**	−0.90**	−0.64*	−0.44
UV-A	−0.61*	−0.75**	−0.31	−0.53	−0.82**	−0.81**	−0.87**	−0.86**	−0.56	−0.35
PAR	−0.45	−0.69**	−0.21	−0.48	−0.89**	−0.87**	−0.85**	−0.87**	−0.61*	−0.42

参数	辐射时间		水深		辐射时间×水深
参数	p值	F值	p值	F值	p值	F值
株高	0.00	20.99	0.00	10.83	0.01	3.04
节间距	0.00	11.04	0.00	12.01	0.00	3.52
叶面积	0.00	9.61	0.60	0.63	0.34	1.18
鲜物质量	0.00	18.29	0.01	4.81	0.46	1.00
Chla	0.00	11.44	0.00	295.46	0.00	42.71
Chlb	0.00	15.65	0.00	111.44	0.00	17.37
F_v/F_m	0.00	22.35	0.00	13.60	0.01	2.82
F_v/F_o	0.00	18.32	0.00	8.40	0.43	1.04
ϕ_PSⅡ	0.00	10.50	0.00	12.37	0.00	6.40
q_P	0.01	4.49	0.16	1.84	0.00	9.45

参数	辐射时间		水深		辐射时间×水深
参数	p值	F值	p值	F值	p值	F值
株高	0.00	20.99	0.00	10.83	0.01	3.04
节间距	0.00	11.04	0.00	12.01	0.00	3.52
叶面积	0.00	9.61	0.60	0.63	0.34	1.18
鲜物质量	0.00	18.29	0.01	4.81	0.46	1.00
Chla	0.00	11.44	0.00	295.46	0.00	42.71
Chlb	0.00	15.65	0.00	111.44	0.00	17.37
F_v/F_m	0.00	22.35	0.00	13.60	0.01	2.82
F_v/F_o	0.00	18.32	0.00	8.40	0.43	1.04
ϕ_PSⅡ	0.00	10.50	0.00	12.37	0.00	6.40
q_P	0.01	4.49	0.16	1.84	0.00	9.45

Response of Potamogeton crispus to Intense Radiation under Different Submergence Depths

不同淹没水深下菹草对强辐射的响应

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 24

Related Articles 11

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	NI Guangyan. Effects of Exotic Plant Invasions on Terrestrial Ecosystems Carbon Cycling [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(7): 1325-1332.
[2]	XU Lanqing, CHENG Bingxu, WANG Chuanxi. Study of the Effect of Biomass Carbon Dots on Corn Photosynthesis and Yield by Foliar Application [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(12): 2166-2173.
[3]	YE Shen, WANG Peng, HUANG Yi, SHE Yuanyang, DING Mingjun. Urban Morphology and the Influence of the Spatial Heterogeneity of PM_2.5 and O₃ Pollution: The Case of the Yangtze River Delta [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(10): 1771-1784.
[4]	CUI Yuanyuan, ZHANG Zhengyun, LIU Peng, ZHANG Yunchun, ZHANG Qiaoying. Morphological Characteristics and Fractal Dimension of Brassia chinensis Root System under Cadmium and Polyethylene Microplastic Stress [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(1): 158-165.
[5]	LEI Jun, ZHANG Jian, ZHAO Funian, QI Yue, ZHANG Xiuyun, LI Qiang, SHANG Junlin. Response of Photosynthetic Parameters for Spring Wheat at Flowering Stage to Soil Moisture and Temperature [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(6): 1151-1159.
[6]	LIU Xiaohong, LIU Liuqingqing, LI Min, LIU Qiang, CAO Dongdong, ZHENG Hao, LUO Xianxiang. Effects of Polyethylene Microplastics with Different Particle Sizes on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Maize and Cucumber [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(6): 1263-1271.
[7]	GAO Ge, GE Xiaogai, ZHOU Jungang, ZHOU Benzhi, LI Zhengcai, YANG Nan. Effect of Drought Stress and Nitrogen Addition on the Biomass and Root Morphology of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Cyclobalanopsis glauca Seedlings [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(12): 2292-2301.
[8]	WANG Jin, HAN Zhiyong, FENG Yan, ZHOU Ruoxin, WANG Shuangchao. Morphological Distribution Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal in the Green Soil of Industrial Zone in Chengdu [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(9): 1923-1932.
[9]	RAN Xiaozhui, LIU Hongyan, TU Yu, GU Xiaofeng, YU Enjiang. Micro-morphology, Heavy Metal Distribution Characteristics and Health Risk Assessment of TSP: A Case Study in Typical Watershed with Superposition of Industry Pollution under High Geological Background in Northwest Guizhou [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(12): 2339-2350.
[10]	SONG Xinbo, HUANG He, GUO Jun, XIONG Mingming. Research on the Impact of Urban Morphology on Thermal Environment in Summer: A Case of Tianjin Central City [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(11): 2165-2174.
[11]	SUI Yanghui, GAO Jiping, WANG Yanbo, XIAO Wanxin, LIU Jing, SHI Lei, ZHAO Haiyan, ZHANG Yang. Biochar and Nitrogen Fertilizer Effects on Soil Nutrient and Root Distribution in Dryland Maize [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(10): 2026-2032.