Ecology and Environment ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 1016-1025.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.06.002
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Keyi1(), LIN Tianmiao2, WANG Jianjun1, HE Youjun1,*(
), ZHANG Liwen3
Received:
2023-04-02
Online:
2023-06-18
Published:
2023-09-01
Contact:
HE Youjun
陈科屹1(), 林田苗2, 王建军1, 何友均1,*(
), 张立文3
通讯作者:
何友均
作者简介:
陈科屹(1989年生),男,助理研究员,博士,研究方向为森林生态与森林经营管理。E-mail: Lowrychen@sina.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
CHEN Keyi, LIN Tianmiao, WANG Jianjun, HE Youjun, ZHANG Liwen. Effects of Natural Forest Conservation Project on Forest Carbon Pool of Key State-Owned Forest Region of Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang Province in the Past 20 Years[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(6): 1016-1025.
陈科屹, 林田苗, 王建军, 何友均, 张立文. 天保工程20年对黑龙江大兴安岭国有林区森林碳库的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(6): 1016-1025.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.06.002
树种 (组) | BEF (分龄组) | R (分龄组) | D | CF | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
幼龄林 | 中龄林 | 近熟林 | 成熟林 | 过熟林 | 幼龄林 | 中龄林 | 近熟林 | 成熟林 | 过熟林 | ||||
落叶松 Larix gmelinii | 1.416 | 1.644 | 1.281 | 1.229 | 1.150 | 0.212 | 0.205 | 0.211 | 0.188 | 0.239 | 0.490 | 0.521 | |
樟子松 Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica | 2.513 | 2.919 | 1.864 | 1.789 | 1.827 | 0.241 | 0.241 | 0.241 | 0.241 | 0.241 | 0.375 | 0.522 | |
杨树 Aspen spp. | 1.446 | 1.496 | 1.369 | 1.390 | 1.460 | 0.227 | 0.259 | 0.227 | 0.171 | 0.209 | 0.378 | 0.485 | |
桦树 Birch spp. | 1.424 | 1.526 | 1.396 | 1.252 | 1.109 | 0.248 | 0.229 | 0.279 | 0.235 | 0.190 | 0.541 | 0.491 | |
柳树 Willow spp. | 1.821 | 1.821 | 1.821 | 1.821 | 1.821 | 0.288 | 0.288 | 0.288 | 0.288 | 0.288 | 0.443 | 0.485 | |
红松 Pinus koraiensis | 1.510 | 1.558 | 1.267 | 1.413 | 1.340 | 0.221 | 0.223 | 0.211 | 0.217 | 0.215 | 0.396 | 0.511 | |
椴树 Linden spp. | 1.407 | 1.407 | 1.407 | 1.407 | 1.407 | 0.201 | 0.201 | 0.201 | 0.201 | 0.201 | 0.420 | 0.439 | |
蒙古栎 Quercus mongolica | 1.355 | 1.380 | 1.327 | 1.360 | 1.474 | 0.292 | 0.260 | 0.275 | 0.410 | 0.281 | 0.676 | 0.500 | |
水曲柳 Fraxinus mandschurica | 1.293 | 1.293 | 1.293 | 1.293 | 1.293 | 0.221 | 0.221 | 0.221 | 0.221 | 0.221 | 0.464 | 0.497 | |
云杉 Picea asperata | 1.734 | 2.326 | 1.516 | 1.473 | 1.427 | 0.224 | 0.185 | 0.224 | 0.244 | 0.302 | 0.342 | 0.521 | |
其他温带杉类 | 1.667 | 2.300 | 1.382 | 1.459 | 1.245 | 0.277 | 0.302 | 0.274 | 0.238 | 0.218 | 0.359 | 0.510 | |
其他温带松类 | 1.631 | 1.881 | 1.461 | 1.456 | 1.200 | 0.206 | 0.213 | 0.216 | 0.202 | 0.284 | 0.424 | 0.511 | |
软阔类 | 1.586 | 1.729 | 1.489 | 1.254 | 1.432 | 0.289 | 0.278 | 0.282 | 0.276 | 0.412 | 0.443 | 0.485 | |
硬阔类 | 1.674 | 1.799 | 1.543 | 1.172 | 1.368 | 0.261 | 0.257 | 0.296 | 0.160 | 0.294 | 0.598 | 0.497 |
Table 1 Biomass model parameters and carbon content coefficients of tree species (groups)
树种 (组) | BEF (分龄组) | R (分龄组) | D | CF | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
幼龄林 | 中龄林 | 近熟林 | 成熟林 | 过熟林 | 幼龄林 | 中龄林 | 近熟林 | 成熟林 | 过熟林 | ||||
落叶松 Larix gmelinii | 1.416 | 1.644 | 1.281 | 1.229 | 1.150 | 0.212 | 0.205 | 0.211 | 0.188 | 0.239 | 0.490 | 0.521 | |
樟子松 Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica | 2.513 | 2.919 | 1.864 | 1.789 | 1.827 | 0.241 | 0.241 | 0.241 | 0.241 | 0.241 | 0.375 | 0.522 | |
杨树 Aspen spp. | 1.446 | 1.496 | 1.369 | 1.390 | 1.460 | 0.227 | 0.259 | 0.227 | 0.171 | 0.209 | 0.378 | 0.485 | |
桦树 Birch spp. | 1.424 | 1.526 | 1.396 | 1.252 | 1.109 | 0.248 | 0.229 | 0.279 | 0.235 | 0.190 | 0.541 | 0.491 | |
柳树 Willow spp. | 1.821 | 1.821 | 1.821 | 1.821 | 1.821 | 0.288 | 0.288 | 0.288 | 0.288 | 0.288 | 0.443 | 0.485 | |
红松 Pinus koraiensis | 1.510 | 1.558 | 1.267 | 1.413 | 1.340 | 0.221 | 0.223 | 0.211 | 0.217 | 0.215 | 0.396 | 0.511 | |
椴树 Linden spp. | 1.407 | 1.407 | 1.407 | 1.407 | 1.407 | 0.201 | 0.201 | 0.201 | 0.201 | 0.201 | 0.420 | 0.439 | |
蒙古栎 Quercus mongolica | 1.355 | 1.380 | 1.327 | 1.360 | 1.474 | 0.292 | 0.260 | 0.275 | 0.410 | 0.281 | 0.676 | 0.500 | |
水曲柳 Fraxinus mandschurica | 1.293 | 1.293 | 1.293 | 1.293 | 1.293 | 0.221 | 0.221 | 0.221 | 0.221 | 0.221 | 0.464 | 0.497 | |
云杉 Picea asperata | 1.734 | 2.326 | 1.516 | 1.473 | 1.427 | 0.224 | 0.185 | 0.224 | 0.244 | 0.302 | 0.342 | 0.521 | |
其他温带杉类 | 1.667 | 2.300 | 1.382 | 1.459 | 1.245 | 0.277 | 0.302 | 0.274 | 0.238 | 0.218 | 0.359 | 0.510 | |
其他温带松类 | 1.631 | 1.881 | 1.461 | 1.456 | 1.200 | 0.206 | 0.213 | 0.216 | 0.202 | 0.284 | 0.424 | 0.511 | |
软阔类 | 1.586 | 1.729 | 1.489 | 1.254 | 1.432 | 0.289 | 0.278 | 0.282 | 0.276 | 0.412 | 0.443 | 0.485 | |
硬阔类 | 1.674 | 1.799 | 1.543 | 1.172 | 1.368 | 0.261 | 0.257 | 0.296 | 0.160 | 0.294 | 0.598 | 0.497 |
区域 | 1998—2010年 | 2011—2018年 | 合计 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | |||
松岭林业局 | 3.73×104 | 4.39 | 7.56×104 | 4.72 | 1.13×105 | 4.60 | ||
新林林业局 | 1.71×104 | 2.01 | 3.32×104 | 2.07 | 5.03×104 | 2.05 | ||
塔河林业局 | 7.47×104 | 8.79 | 1.27×105 | 7.93 | 2.02×105 | 8.23 | ||
呼中林业局 | 3.06×104 | 3.61 | 5.11×104 | 3.19 | 8.18×104 | 3.33 | ||
阿木尔林业局 | 3.25×104 | 3.80 | 5.48×104 | 3.42 | 8.73×104 | 3.56 | ||
图强林业局 | 2.93×104 | 3.45 | 5.67×104 | 3.54 | 8.60×104 | 3.51 | ||
漠河林业局 | 1.66×105 | 19.55 | 2.87×105 | 17.93 | 4.53×105 | 18.49 | ||
十八站林业局 | 2.92×103 | 0.34 | 6.99×103 | 0.44 | 9.91×103 | 0.40 | ||
韩家园林业局 | 7.72×101 | 0.01 | 8.45×102 | 0.05 | 9.22×102 | 0.04 | ||
加格达奇林业局 | 4.59×105 | 54.03 | 9.09×105 | 56.72 | 1.37×106 | 55.79 | ||
合计 | 8.49×105 | 100.00 | 1.60×106 | 100.00 | 2.45×106 | 100.00 |
Table 2 Carbon sink generated by artificial forestation of Natural Forest Protection Project in key state-owned forest region of Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang province from 1998 to 2018
区域 | 1998—2010年 | 2011—2018年 | 合计 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | |||
松岭林业局 | 3.73×104 | 4.39 | 7.56×104 | 4.72 | 1.13×105 | 4.60 | ||
新林林业局 | 1.71×104 | 2.01 | 3.32×104 | 2.07 | 5.03×104 | 2.05 | ||
塔河林业局 | 7.47×104 | 8.79 | 1.27×105 | 7.93 | 2.02×105 | 8.23 | ||
呼中林业局 | 3.06×104 | 3.61 | 5.11×104 | 3.19 | 8.18×104 | 3.33 | ||
阿木尔林业局 | 3.25×104 | 3.80 | 5.48×104 | 3.42 | 8.73×104 | 3.56 | ||
图强林业局 | 2.93×104 | 3.45 | 5.67×104 | 3.54 | 8.60×104 | 3.51 | ||
漠河林业局 | 1.66×105 | 19.55 | 2.87×105 | 17.93 | 4.53×105 | 18.49 | ||
十八站林业局 | 2.92×103 | 0.34 | 6.99×103 | 0.44 | 9.91×103 | 0.40 | ||
韩家园林业局 | 7.72×101 | 0.01 | 8.45×102 | 0.05 | 9.22×102 | 0.04 | ||
加格达奇林业局 | 4.59×105 | 54.03 | 9.09×105 | 56.72 | 1.37×106 | 55.79 | ||
合计 | 8.49×105 | 100.00 | 1.60×106 | 100.00 | 2.45×106 | 100.00 |
区域 | 1998—2010年 | 2011—2018年 | 合计 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | |||
松岭林业局 | 4.94×106 | 7.78 | 3.29×106 | 7.78 | 8.23×106 | 7.78 | ||
新林林业局 | 6.50×106 | 10.25 | 4.34×106 | 10.25 | 1.08×107 | 10.25 | ||
塔河林业局 | 1.11×107 | 17.53 | 7.41×106 | 17.53 | 1.85×107 | 17.53 | ||
呼中林业局 | 6.95×106 | 10.95 | 4.63×106 | 10.95 | 1.16×107 | 10.95 | ||
阿木尔林业局 | 5.75×106 | 9.07 | 3.83×106 | 9.07 | 9.59×106 | 9.07 | ||
图强林业局 | 5.15×106 | 8.11 | 3.43×106 | 8.11 | 8.58×106 | 8.11 | ||
漠河林业局 | 5.78×106 | 9.11 | 3.85×106 | 9.11 | 9.63×106 | 9.11 | ||
十八站林业局 | 3.03×106 | 4.78 | 2.02×106 | 4.78 | 5.05×106 | 4.78 | ||
韩家园林业局 | 9.05×106 | 14.26 | 6.03×106 | 14.26 | 1.51×107 | 14.26 | ||
加格达奇林业局 | 5.18×106 | 8.16 | 3.45×106 | 8.16 | 8.63×106 | 8.16 | ||
合计 | 6.34×107 | 100.00 | 4.23×107 | 100.00 | 1.06×108 | 100.00 |
Table 3 Carbon sink generated by forest management of Natural Forest Protection Project in key state-owned forest region of Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang province from 1998 to 2018
区域 | 1998—2010年 | 2011—2018年 | 合计 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | |||
松岭林业局 | 4.94×106 | 7.78 | 3.29×106 | 7.78 | 8.23×106 | 7.78 | ||
新林林业局 | 6.50×106 | 10.25 | 4.34×106 | 10.25 | 1.08×107 | 10.25 | ||
塔河林业局 | 1.11×107 | 17.53 | 7.41×106 | 17.53 | 1.85×107 | 17.53 | ||
呼中林业局 | 6.95×106 | 10.95 | 4.63×106 | 10.95 | 1.16×107 | 10.95 | ||
阿木尔林业局 | 5.75×106 | 9.07 | 3.83×106 | 9.07 | 9.59×106 | 9.07 | ||
图强林业局 | 5.15×106 | 8.11 | 3.43×106 | 8.11 | 8.58×106 | 8.11 | ||
漠河林业局 | 5.78×106 | 9.11 | 3.85×106 | 9.11 | 9.63×106 | 9.11 | ||
十八站林业局 | 3.03×106 | 4.78 | 2.02×106 | 4.78 | 5.05×106 | 4.78 | ||
韩家园林业局 | 9.05×106 | 14.26 | 6.03×106 | 14.26 | 1.51×107 | 14.26 | ||
加格达奇林业局 | 5.18×106 | 8.16 | 3.45×106 | 8.16 | 8.63×106 | 8.16 | ||
合计 | 6.34×107 | 100.00 | 4.23×107 | 100.00 | 1.06×108 | 100.00 |
区域 | 1998—2010年 | 2011—2018年 | 合计 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | |||
松岭林业局 | 5.65×105 | 5.86 | 1.53×106 | 10.38 | 2.09×106 | 8.59 | ||
新林林业局 | 2.04×106 | 21.19 | 2.69×106 | 18.28 | 4.73×106 | 19.43 | ||
塔河林业局 | 1.75×106 | 18.14 | 2.13×106 | 14.53 | 3.89×106 | 15.96 | ||
呼中林业局 | 2.68×106 | 27.77 | 2.36×106 | 16.04 | 5.04×106 | 20.69 | ||
阿木尔林业局 | 1.10×106 | 11.44 | 1.20×106 | 8.18 | 2.31×106 | 9.47 | ||
图强林业局 | 1.04×106 | 10.80 | 1.40×106 | 9.50 | 2.44×106 | 10.01 | ||
漠河林业局 | 5.69×105 | 5.90 | 1.30×106 | 8.82 | 1.86×106 | 7.66 | ||
十八站林业局 | 2.67×105 | 2.77 | 1.55×106 | 10.52 | 1.81×106 | 7.45 | ||
韩家园林业局 | -3.80×105 | -3.93 | 5.45×105 | 3.71 | 1.65×105 | 0.68 | ||
加格达奇林业局 | 6.37×103 | 0.07 | 7.83×103 | 0.05 | 1.42×104 | 0.06 | ||
合计 | 9.65×106 | 100.00 | 1.47×107 | 100.00 | 2.43×107 | 100.00 |
Table 4 Carbon sink generated by cutting timber output of Natural Forest Protection Project in key state-owned forest region of Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang province from 1998 to 2018
区域 | 1998—2010年 | 2011—2018年 | 合计 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳汇量/ Mg | 比例/ % | |||
松岭林业局 | 5.65×105 | 5.86 | 1.53×106 | 10.38 | 2.09×106 | 8.59 | ||
新林林业局 | 2.04×106 | 21.19 | 2.69×106 | 18.28 | 4.73×106 | 19.43 | ||
塔河林业局 | 1.75×106 | 18.14 | 2.13×106 | 14.53 | 3.89×106 | 15.96 | ||
呼中林业局 | 2.68×106 | 27.77 | 2.36×106 | 16.04 | 5.04×106 | 20.69 | ||
阿木尔林业局 | 1.10×106 | 11.44 | 1.20×106 | 8.18 | 2.31×106 | 9.47 | ||
图强林业局 | 1.04×106 | 10.80 | 1.40×106 | 9.50 | 2.44×106 | 10.01 | ||
漠河林业局 | 5.69×105 | 5.90 | 1.30×106 | 8.82 | 1.86×106 | 7.66 | ||
十八站林业局 | 2.67×105 | 2.77 | 1.55×106 | 10.52 | 1.81×106 | 7.45 | ||
韩家园林业局 | -3.80×105 | -3.93 | 5.45×105 | 3.71 | 1.65×105 | 0.68 | ||
加格达奇林业局 | 6.37×103 | 0.07 | 7.83×103 | 0.05 | 1.42×104 | 0.06 | ||
合计 | 9.65×106 | 100.00 | 1.47×107 | 100.00 | 2.43×107 | 100.00 |
区域 | 碳排放量/Mg | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
人工造林 | 森林抚育 | 森林管护 | 合计 | 比例% | |
松岭林业局 | 1.32×103 (1.07×103/2.50×102) | 1.46×104 (8.79×103/5.83×103) | 3.82×103 (2.37×103/1.46×103) | 1.98×104 (1.22×104/7.54×103) | 9.30 (9.19/9.48) |
新林林业局 | 7.38×102 (5.67×102/1.71×102) | 1.87×104 (1.12×104/7.53×103) | 4.87×103 (3.02×103/1.86×103) | 2.44×104 (1.48×104/9.55×103) | 11.46 (11.13/12.02) |
塔河林业局 | 9.98×102 (8.28×102/1.71×102) | 1.92×104 (1.14×104/7.79×103) | 5.16×103 (3.19×103/1.96×103) | 2.53×104 (1.54×104/9.92×103) | 11.91 (11.57/12.48) |
呼中林业局 | 1.12×103 (7.96×102/3.29×102) | 1.78×104 (1.08×104/6.97×103) | 4.35×103 (2.69×103/1.66×103) | 2.33×104 (1.43×104/8.96×103) | 10.96 (10.78/11.26) |
阿木尔林业局 | 6.53×102 (4.43×102/2.10×102) | 1.24×104 (7.49×103/4.93×103) | 3.10×103 (1.92×103/1.18×103) | 1.62×104 (9.85×103/6.32×103) | 7.61 (7.41/7.95) |
图强林业局 | 5.39×102 (4.47×102/9.20×101) | 1.25×104 (7.48×103/4.98×103) | 2.84×103 (1.76×103/1.08×103) | 1.58×104 (9.68×103/6.15×103) | 7.45 (7.28/7.73) |
漠河林业局 | 1.49×103 (8.71×102/6.18×102) | 1.33×104 (8.08×103/5.25×103) | 3.34×103 (2.07×103/1.27×103) | 1.82×104 (1.10×104/7.14×103) | 8.54 (8.28/8.98) |
十八站林业局 | 6.17×102 (4.33×102/1.84×102) | 1.39×104 (8.55×103/5.40×103) | 3.34×103 (2.07×103/1.27×103) | 1.79×104 (1.10×104/6.85×103) | 8.42 (8.31/8.62) |
韩家园林业局 | 5.17×102 (2.93×102/2.23×102) | 1.68×104 (1.01×104/6.67×103) | 3.93×103 (2.43×103/1.50×103) | 2.12×104 (1.29×104/8.39×103) | 10.00 (9.67/10.55) |
加格达奇林业局 | 8.45×103 (8.34×103/1.18×102) | 1.74×104 (1.06×104/6.79×103) | 4.66×103 (2.89×103/1.78×103) | 3.05×104 (2.18×104/8.69×103) | 14.34 (16.38/10.93) |
合计 | 1.64×104 (1.41×104/2.37×103) | 1.57×105 (9.45×104/6.21×104) | 3.94×104 (2.44×104/1.50×104) | 2.12×105 (1.33×105/7.95×104) | 100.00 (100/100) |
Table 5 Carbon emission generated by forest management of Natural Forest Protection Project in key state-owned forest region of Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang province from 1998 to 2018
区域 | 碳排放量/Mg | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
人工造林 | 森林抚育 | 森林管护 | 合计 | 比例% | |
松岭林业局 | 1.32×103 (1.07×103/2.50×102) | 1.46×104 (8.79×103/5.83×103) | 3.82×103 (2.37×103/1.46×103) | 1.98×104 (1.22×104/7.54×103) | 9.30 (9.19/9.48) |
新林林业局 | 7.38×102 (5.67×102/1.71×102) | 1.87×104 (1.12×104/7.53×103) | 4.87×103 (3.02×103/1.86×103) | 2.44×104 (1.48×104/9.55×103) | 11.46 (11.13/12.02) |
塔河林业局 | 9.98×102 (8.28×102/1.71×102) | 1.92×104 (1.14×104/7.79×103) | 5.16×103 (3.19×103/1.96×103) | 2.53×104 (1.54×104/9.92×103) | 11.91 (11.57/12.48) |
呼中林业局 | 1.12×103 (7.96×102/3.29×102) | 1.78×104 (1.08×104/6.97×103) | 4.35×103 (2.69×103/1.66×103) | 2.33×104 (1.43×104/8.96×103) | 10.96 (10.78/11.26) |
阿木尔林业局 | 6.53×102 (4.43×102/2.10×102) | 1.24×104 (7.49×103/4.93×103) | 3.10×103 (1.92×103/1.18×103) | 1.62×104 (9.85×103/6.32×103) | 7.61 (7.41/7.95) |
图强林业局 | 5.39×102 (4.47×102/9.20×101) | 1.25×104 (7.48×103/4.98×103) | 2.84×103 (1.76×103/1.08×103) | 1.58×104 (9.68×103/6.15×103) | 7.45 (7.28/7.73) |
漠河林业局 | 1.49×103 (8.71×102/6.18×102) | 1.33×104 (8.08×103/5.25×103) | 3.34×103 (2.07×103/1.27×103) | 1.82×104 (1.10×104/7.14×103) | 8.54 (8.28/8.98) |
十八站林业局 | 6.17×102 (4.33×102/1.84×102) | 1.39×104 (8.55×103/5.40×103) | 3.34×103 (2.07×103/1.27×103) | 1.79×104 (1.10×104/6.85×103) | 8.42 (8.31/8.62) |
韩家园林业局 | 5.17×102 (2.93×102/2.23×102) | 1.68×104 (1.01×104/6.67×103) | 3.93×103 (2.43×103/1.50×103) | 2.12×104 (1.29×104/8.39×103) | 10.00 (9.67/10.55) |
加格达奇林业局 | 8.45×103 (8.34×103/1.18×102) | 1.74×104 (1.06×104/6.79×103) | 4.66×103 (2.89×103/1.78×103) | 3.05×104 (2.18×104/8.69×103) | 14.34 (16.38/10.93) |
合计 | 1.64×104 (1.41×104/2.37×103) | 1.57×105 (9.45×104/6.21×104) | 3.94×104 (2.44×104/1.50×104) | 2.12×105 (1.33×105/7.95×104) | 100.00 (100/100) |
区域 | 1998—2010年 | 2011—2018年 | 合计 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碳泄漏/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳泄漏/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳泄漏/ Mg | 比例/ % | |||
松岭林业局 | 4.04×103 | 5.86 | 1.09×104 | 10.38 | 1.49×104 | 8.59 | ||
新林林业局 | 1.46×104 | 21.19 | 1.92×104 | 18.28 | 3.38×104 | 19.43 | ||
塔河林业局 | 1.25×104 | 18.14 | 1.53×104 | 14.53 | 2.78×104 | 15.96 | ||
呼中林业局 | 1.92×104 | 27.77 | 1.68×104 | 16.04 | 3.60×104 | 20.69 | ||
阿木尔林业局 | 7.89×103 | 11.44 | 8.58×103 | 8.18 | 1.65×104 | 9.47 | ||
图强林业局 | 7.45×103 | 10.80 | 9.97×103 | 9.50 | 1.74×104 | 10.01 | ||
漠河林业局 | 4.07×103 | 5.90 | 9.26×103 | 8.82 | 1.33×104 | 7.66 | ||
十八站林业局 | 1.91×103 | 2.77 | 1.10×104 | 10.52 | 1.30×104 | 7.45 | ||
韩家园林业局 | -2.71×103 | -3.93 | 3.89×103 | 3.71 | 1.18×103 | 0.68 | ||
加格达奇林业局 | 4.55×101 | 0.07 | 5.59×101 | 0.05 | 1.01×102 | 0.06 | ||
合计 | 6.90×104 | 100.00 | 1.05×105 | 100.00 | 1.74×105 | 100.00 |
Table 6 Carbon leakage generated by forest management of Natural Forest Protection Project in key state-owned forest region of Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang province from 1998 to 2018
区域 | 1998—2010年 | 2011—2018年 | 合计 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碳泄漏/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳泄漏/ Mg | 比例/ % | 碳泄漏/ Mg | 比例/ % | |||
松岭林业局 | 4.04×103 | 5.86 | 1.09×104 | 10.38 | 1.49×104 | 8.59 | ||
新林林业局 | 1.46×104 | 21.19 | 1.92×104 | 18.28 | 3.38×104 | 19.43 | ||
塔河林业局 | 1.25×104 | 18.14 | 1.53×104 | 14.53 | 2.78×104 | 15.96 | ||
呼中林业局 | 1.92×104 | 27.77 | 1.68×104 | 16.04 | 3.60×104 | 20.69 | ||
阿木尔林业局 | 7.89×103 | 11.44 | 8.58×103 | 8.18 | 1.65×104 | 9.47 | ||
图强林业局 | 7.45×103 | 10.80 | 9.97×103 | 9.50 | 1.74×104 | 10.01 | ||
漠河林业局 | 4.07×103 | 5.90 | 9.26×103 | 8.82 | 1.33×104 | 7.66 | ||
十八站林业局 | 1.91×103 | 2.77 | 1.10×104 | 10.52 | 1.30×104 | 7.45 | ||
韩家园林业局 | -2.71×103 | -3.93 | 3.89×103 | 3.71 | 1.18×103 | 0.68 | ||
加格达奇林业局 | 4.55×101 | 0.07 | 5.59×101 | 0.05 | 1.01×102 | 0.06 | ||
合计 | 6.90×104 | 100.00 | 1.05×105 | 100.00 | 1.74×105 | 100.00 |
区域 | 1998—2010年 | 2011—2018年 | 合计 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
净固碳量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 净固碳量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 净固碳量/ Mg | 比例/ % | |||
松岭林业局 | 5.52×106 | 7.49 | 4.87×106 | 8.34 | 1.04×107 | 7.87 | ||
新林林业局 | 8.54×106 | 11.57 | 7.02×106 | 12.03 | 1.56×107 | 11.78 | ||
塔河林业局 | 1.29×107 | 17.52 | 9.65×106 | 16.52 | 2.26×107 | 17.08 | ||
呼中林业局 | 9.62×106 | 13.05 | 7.01×106 | 12.01 | 1.66×107 | 12.59 | ||
阿木尔林业局 | 6.87×106 | 9.32 | 5.08×106 | 8.69 | 1.19×107 | 9.04 | ||
图强林业局 | 6.20×106 | 8.41 | 4.87×106 | 8.33 | 1.11×107 | 8.38 | ||
漠河林业局 | 6.50×106 | 8.82 | 5.42×106 | 9.28 | 1.19×107 | 9.02 | ||
十八站林业局 | 3.29×106 | 4.46 | 3.55×106 | 6.09 | 6.84×106 | 5.18 | ||
韩家园林业局 | 8.66×106 | 11.74 | 6.57×106 | 11.24 | 1.52×107 | 11.52 | ||
加格达奇林业局 | 5.62×106 | 7.62 | 4.36×106 | 7.47 | 9.98×106 | 7.55 | ||
合计 | 7.37×107 | 100.00 | 5.84×107 | 100.00 | 1.32×108 | 100.00 |
Table 7 The net carbon sink generated by Natural Forest Protection Project in key state-owned forest region of Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang province from 1998 to 2018
区域 | 1998—2010年 | 2011—2018年 | 合计 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
净固碳量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 净固碳量/ Mg | 比例/ % | 净固碳量/ Mg | 比例/ % | |||
松岭林业局 | 5.52×106 | 7.49 | 4.87×106 | 8.34 | 1.04×107 | 7.87 | ||
新林林业局 | 8.54×106 | 11.57 | 7.02×106 | 12.03 | 1.56×107 | 11.78 | ||
塔河林业局 | 1.29×107 | 17.52 | 9.65×106 | 16.52 | 2.26×107 | 17.08 | ||
呼中林业局 | 9.62×106 | 13.05 | 7.01×106 | 12.01 | 1.66×107 | 12.59 | ||
阿木尔林业局 | 6.87×106 | 9.32 | 5.08×106 | 8.69 | 1.19×107 | 9.04 | ||
图强林业局 | 6.20×106 | 8.41 | 4.87×106 | 8.33 | 1.11×107 | 8.38 | ||
漠河林业局 | 6.50×106 | 8.82 | 5.42×106 | 9.28 | 1.19×107 | 9.02 | ||
十八站林业局 | 3.29×106 | 4.46 | 3.55×106 | 6.09 | 6.84×106 | 5.18 | ||
韩家园林业局 | 8.66×106 | 11.74 | 6.57×106 | 11.24 | 1.52×107 | 11.52 | ||
加格达奇林业局 | 5.62×106 | 7.62 | 4.36×106 | 7.47 | 9.98×106 | 7.55 | ||
合计 | 7.37×107 | 100.00 | 5.84×107 | 100.00 | 1.32×108 | 100.00 |
[1] | FAO, 2020. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020, Main report[R]. Rome: FAO. |
[2] |
GREEN J K, KEENAN T F, 2022. The limits of forest carbon sequestration[J]. Science, 376(6594): 692-693.
DOI PMID |
[3] |
HAYWOOD A, STONE C, 2017. Estimating large area forest carbon stocks: Apragmatic design based strategy[J]. Forests, 8(4): 93-99.
DOI URL |
[4] |
JIANG L, ZHAO W, LEWIS B J, et al., 2018. Effects of management regimes on carbon sequestration under the natural forest protection program in northeast China[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 29(5): 1187-1194.
DOI |
[5] | MAGNANI F, DEWAR R C, BORGHETTI M, 2009. Leakage and spillover effects of forest management on carbon storage: Theoretical insights from a simple model[J]. Tellus Seriesb Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 61(2): 385-393. |
[6] |
MATHIAS N, SEBASTIAN E, HUBERT H, 2023. A simple concept for estimating deadwood carbon in forests[J]. Carbon Management, 14(1): 2197762.
DOI URL |
[7] |
TIMMERMANN V, DIBDIAKOVA J, 2014. Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry in East Norway[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(9): 1593-1606.
DOI URL |
[8] |
WANG J, FENG L, PALMER P I, et al., 2020. Large Chinese land carbon sink estimated from atmospheric carbon dioxide data[J]. Nature, 586(7831): 720-723.
DOI |
[9] |
WERNICK I K, KAUPPI P E, 2022. Storing carbon or growing forests?[J]. Land Use Policy, 121: 106319.
DOI URL |
[10] |
YAO Y T, PIAO S L, WANG T, 2018. Future biomass carbon sequestration capacity of Chinese forests[J]. Science Bulletin, 63(17): 1108-1117.
DOI PMID |
[11] |
YIN Y H, MA D Y, WU S H, 2018. Climate change risk to forests in China associated with warming[J]. Scientific Reports, 8(1): 493.
DOI PMID |
[12] |
ZHOU W M, LEWIS B J, WU S N, et al., 2014. Biomass carbon storage and its sequestration potential of afforestation under natural forest protection program in China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 24(4): 406-413.
DOI URL |
[13] | 陈科屹, 何友均, 谢和生, 等, 2022a. 黑龙江省大兴安岭重点国有林区复合系统耦合协调发展评价与预测[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 38(5): 578-586. |
CHEN K Y, HE Y J, XIE H S, et al., 2022a. Evaluation and prediction of coupling coordinated development of compound system of key state-owned forest region in Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang Province[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 38(5): 578-586. | |
[14] | 陈科屹, 王建军, 何友均, 等, 2022b. 黑龙江大兴安岭重点国有林区森林碳储量及固碳潜力评估[J]. 生态环境学报, 31(9): 1725-1734. |
CHEN K Y, WANG J J, HE Y J, et al., 2022b. Estimations of forest carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential of key state-owned forest region in Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang Province[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 31(9): 1725-1734. | |
[15] | 范琳, 2019. 山西省天然林保护工程综合效益评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 34(3): 265-272. |
FAN L, 2019. Comprehensive benefit assessment of natural forests protection project in Shanxi province[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry College, 34(3): 265-272. | |
[16] | 国家发展和改革委员会应对气候变化司, 2014. 中国温室气体清单研究[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版社. |
Department of Climate Change, National Development and Reform Commission, 2014. Greenhouse gas inventory research in China[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Press. | |
[17] | 国家林业和草原局, 2019. 中国森林资源报告2014-2018[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社. |
National Forestry and Grassland Administration, 2019. China forest resources report 2014-2018[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. | |
[18] | 郭焱, 周旺明, 于大炮, 等, 2015. 长江上游天然林资源保护工程区森林植被碳储量研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 24(Z1): 221-228. |
GUO Y, ZHOU W M, YU D P, et al., 2015. Research on forest vegetation carbon storage under the national natural forest protection project in the upper reaches of Yangtze River[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 24(Z1): 221-228. | |
[19] | 何韵, 费梓萱, 叶新建, 等, 2022. 天保工程碳汇价值评估及对 “碳中和” 的意义研究[J]. 公共管理学报, 19(2): 154-163, 176. |
HE Y, FEI Z X, YE X J, et al., 2022. Evaluation of carbon sink value of NFPP and the significance of “Carbon Neutralization”[J]. Journal of Public Management, 19(2): 154-163, 176. | |
[20] | 胡会峰, 刘国华, 2006. 中国天然林保护工程的固碳能力估算[J]. 生态学报, (1): 291-296. |
HU H F, LIU G H, 2006. Carbon sequestration of China’s national natural forest protection project[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, (1): 291-296. | |
[21] | 黄龙生, 王兵, 牛香, 等, 2017. 天保工程对东北和内蒙古重点国有林区保育土壤生态效益的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 15(5): 67-77. |
HUANG L S, WANG B, NIU X, et al., 2017. Evaluation on the influence of natural forest protection program on soil conservation and ecological benefits in key state-owned forest districts in northeast China-Inner Mongolia Area[J] Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 15(5): 67-77. | |
[22] | 金旻, 2021. 天然林保护始终坚持以人民为中心[N]. 中国绿色时报, 2021-7-30(2). |
JIN M, 2021. Natural forest protection has always been people- centered[N]. China Green Times, 2021-7-30(2). | |
[23] | 李海奎, 雷渊才, 2010. 中国森林植被生物量和碳储量评估[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社. |
LI H K, LEI Y C, 2010. The assessment of forest vegetation biomass and carbon storage in China[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. | |
[24] | 刘博杰, 逯非, 王效科, 等, 2016. 中国天然林资源保护工程温室气体排放及净固碳能力[J]. 生态学报, 36(14): 4266-4278. |
LIU B J, LU F, WANG X K, et al., 2016. Greenhouse gas emissions and net carbon sequestration of the natural forest protection program in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(14): 4266-4278. | |
[25] | 刘博杰, 逯非, 王效科, 等, 2017. 森林经营与管理下的温室气体排放、碳泄漏和净固碳量研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 28(2): 673-688. |
LIU B J, LU F, WANG X K, et al., 2017. Greenhouse gas emissions, carbon leakage and net carbon sequestration from afforestation and forest management: A review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 28(2): 673-688. | |
[26] | 刘迎春, 高显连, 付超, 等, 2019. 基于森林资源清查数据估算中国森林生物量固碳潜力[J]. 生态学报, 39(11): 4002-4010. |
LIU Y C, GAO X L, FU C, et al., 2019. Estimation of carbon sequestration potential of forest biomass in China based on National Forest Resources Inventory[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(11): 4002-4010. | |
[27] | 宁可, 沈月琴, 朱臻, 等, 2014. 农户杉木经营的固碳能力影响因素及碳供给决策措施[J]. 林业科学, 50(9):129-137. |
NING K, SHEN Y Q, ZHU Z, et al., 2014. Factors of carbon sequestration’s capacity of Chinese fir by households and decision-making measures of carbon supply[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 50(9): 129-137. | |
[28] | 欧光龙, 唐军荣, 王俊峰, 等, 2010. 云南省临沧市膏桐能源林造林碳汇计量[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 16(5): 745-749. |
OU G L, TANG J R, WANG J F, et al., 2010. Carbon accounting of jatropha curcus energy forest in Lincang, Yunnan, China[J]. Chinese Journal Application Environmental Biology, 16(5): 745-749. | |
[29] |
相恒星, 王宗明, 毛德华, 2021. 东北地区天然林资源保护工程生态保护成效分析[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 38(3): 314-322.
DOI |
XIANG H X, WANG Z M, MAO D H, 2021. Ecological effect of natural forest protection project in northeast China[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 38(3): 314-322.
DOI |
|
[30] | 张逸如, 刘晓彤, 高文强, 等, 2021. 天然林保护工程区近20年森林植被碳储量动态及碳汇 (源) 特征[J]. 生态学报, 41(13): 5093-5105. |
ZHANG Y R, LIU X T, GAO W Q, et al., 2021. Dynamic changes of forest vegetation carbon storage and the characteristics of carbon sink (source) in the natural forest protection project region for the past 20 years[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(13): 5093-5105. | |
[31] | 张颖, 李晓格, 温亚利, 2022. 碳达峰碳中和背景下中国森林碳汇潜力分析研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 44(1): 38-47. |
ZHANG Y, LI X G, WEN Y L, 2022. Forest carbon sequestration potential in China under the background of carbon emission peak and carbon neutralization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 44(1): 38-47. | |
[32] | 张志达, 2002. 天保工程的实施背景、进展及对策[J]. 林业经济 (1): 36-39. |
ZHANG Z D, 2002. Implementation background, progress and countermeasures of the natural forest protection project[J]. Forestry Economics (1): 36-39. | |
[33] | 赵福生, 师庆东, 衣怀峰, 等, 2015. 克拉玛依造林减排项目温室气体 (GHG) 减排量计算[J]. 干旱区研究, 32(2): 382-387. |
ZHAO F S, SHI Q D, YI H F, et al., 2015. Emission reductions of greenhouse gas of afforestation carbon sequestration projects in Karamay[J]. Arid Zone Research, 32(2): 382-387. | |
[34] | 赵苗苗, 赵娜, 刘羽, 等, 2019. 森林碳计量方法研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 39(11): 3797-3807. |
ZHAO M M, ZHAO N, LIU Y, et al., 2019. An overview of forest carbon measurement methods[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(11): 3797-3807. | |
[35] |
郑树峰, 王丽萍, 臧淑英, 2021. 大兴安岭天保工程区生态系统服务变化研究[J]. 地理科学, 41(7): 1295-1302.
DOI |
ZHENG S F, WANG L P, ZANG S Y, 2021. The change of ecosystem services of natural forest protection project regions in the Da Hinggan Mountains[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 41(7): 1295-1302.
DOI |
|
[36] | 中国政府网, 2011. 国家林业局权威解读天然林资源保护工程二期政策[EB/OL]. [2011-05-17]. https://www.gov.cn/govweb/gzdt/2011-05/17/content_1865437.htm。 |
Government of the PRC, 2011. State Forestry Administration’s authoritative interpretation of the policy of Natural Forest Resources Protection Project Phase II[EB/OL]. [2011-05-17]. https://www.gov.cn/govweb/gzdt/2011-05/17/content_1865437.htm。 |
[1] | ZHANG Lu, HE Yufei, CHEN Tan, YANG Ting, ZHANG Bing, JIN Jun. The Spatial and Temporal Pattern Evolution of Carbon Footprint of Farmland Ecosystem in Fenwei Plain from 2011 to 2020 [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(6): 1149-1162. |
[2] | CHEN Keyi, WANG Jianjun, HE Youjun, ZHANG Liwen. Estimations of Forest Carbon Storage and Carbon Sequestration Potential of Key State-Owned Forest Region in Daxing’anling, Heilongjiang Province [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(9): 1725-1734. |
[3] | WANG Chao, YANG Qiannan, ZHANG Chi, LI Xiangdong, CHEN Jing, ZHANG Xiaolong, CHEN Jinjie, LIU Kexue. Soil Organic Carbon Fractions and Their Sensitivities to Land Use in the Typical Danxia landform Area in the Humid Region of Southeast China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(6): 1132-1140. |
[4] | HE Yating, XIE Hesheng, HE Youjun. Effects of Different Forest Management Regimes on Carbon Stock of Natural Secondary Quercus Mongolica Forests [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(2): 215-223. |
[5] | DENG Yujiao, WANG Jiechun, XU Jie, WU Yongqi, CHEN Jingyang. Spatiotemporal Variation of Vegetation Carbon Sequestration and Its Meteorological Contribution in Guangdong Province [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(1): 1-8. |
[6] | HU Rui, FANG Huanying, XIAO Shengsheng, DUAN Jian, ZHANG Jie, LIU Hongguang, TANG Chongjun. Soil Carbon Sink Effect of Main Management Models in Typical Granite Erosion Area of Red Soil in South China [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(8): 1617-1626. |
[7] | MA Qiongfang, YAN Hong, LI Wei, ZHAO Xinsheng, CHEN Ling, ZHANG Chaofan, LI Jieling. Evaluation of Carbon Sequestration and Oxygen Release Function of Wetland Ecosystem in Jilin Province [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(12): 2351-2359. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn