Ecology and Environment ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 2317-2323.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.12.006
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
SHU Yang1,2(), ZHOU Mei1,2,*(
), ZHAO Pengwu1,2, ZHANG Heng1, GUO Jiaoyu1, GUAN Lijuan1
Received:
2021-07-06
Online:
2021-12-18
Published:
2022-01-04
Contact:
ZHOU Mei
舒洋1,2(), 周梅1,2,*(
), 赵鹏武1,2, 张恒1, 郭娇宇1, 管立娟1
通讯作者:
周梅
作者简介:
舒洋(1988年生),男,实验师,博士,主要从事森林生态与森林防火研究。E-mail: shuyang2018@imau.edu.cn
基金资助:
CLC Number:
SHU Yang, ZHOU Mei, ZHAO Pengwu, ZHANG Heng, GUO Jiaoyu, GUAN Lijuan. Surface Dead Fuel Load and Influencing Factors After Lighting Fire Disturbance in Genhe of Daxinganling[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(12): 2317-2323.
舒洋, 周梅, 赵鹏武, 张恒, 郭娇宇, 管立娟. 大兴安岭根河雷击火干扰后地表死可燃物负荷及影响因子[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(12): 2317-2323.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.12.006
样地类型 Plot type | 经纬度 Latitude and longitude | 海拔 Altitude/m | 林分 Forest stand | 平均胸径 Average breast diameter/cm | 平均树高 Average tree height/m | 死立木比例 Dead wood ratio/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
轻度火烧 Mild fire | 122°06′23.65″E 50°57′21.21″N | 871.4 | 落叶松-白桦混交林 Larch-birch mixed forest | 8.70±0.42 | 9.28±0.41 | 13—26 |
重度火烧 Severe fire | 12°07′12.68″ E 50°56′18.12″ N | 846.5 | 落叶松-白桦混交林 Larch-birch mixed forest | 6.72±1.25 | 6.77±2.05 | 61—100 |
对照样地 Control plot | 122°04′25.36″ E 50°57′23.05″ N | 857.8 | 落叶松-白桦混交林 Larch-birch mixed forest | 7.83±2.17 | 8.27±2.03 | <5 |
Table 1 Overview of sample plots
样地类型 Plot type | 经纬度 Latitude and longitude | 海拔 Altitude/m | 林分 Forest stand | 平均胸径 Average breast diameter/cm | 平均树高 Average tree height/m | 死立木比例 Dead wood ratio/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
轻度火烧 Mild fire | 122°06′23.65″E 50°57′21.21″N | 871.4 | 落叶松-白桦混交林 Larch-birch mixed forest | 8.70±0.42 | 9.28±0.41 | 13—26 |
重度火烧 Severe fire | 12°07′12.68″ E 50°56′18.12″ N | 846.5 | 落叶松-白桦混交林 Larch-birch mixed forest | 6.72±1.25 | 6.77±2.05 | 61—100 |
对照样地 Control plot | 122°04′25.36″ E 50°57′23.05″ N | 857.8 | 落叶松-白桦混交林 Larch-birch mixed forest | 7.83±2.17 | 8.27±2.03 | <5 |
样地类型 Plot type | 1 h时滞可燃物 1 h time lag combustibles | 10 h时滞可燃物 10 h time lag combustibles | 100 h时滞可燃物 100 h time lag combustibles | 总负荷量 Total load |
---|---|---|---|---|
对照样地 Control plot | 0.927±0.353a | 0.201±0.027a | 0.081±0.037a | 1.073±0.427a |
轻度火烧 Mild fire | 0.727±0.394ab | 0.139±0.056b | 0.072±0.027ab | 0.954±0.441ab |
重度火烧 Severe fire | 0.508±0.269b | 0.074±0.018c | 0.042±0.016b | 0.584±0.312b |
Table 2 Surface dead combustible load of different types of sample plots kg∙m-2
样地类型 Plot type | 1 h时滞可燃物 1 h time lag combustibles | 10 h时滞可燃物 10 h time lag combustibles | 100 h时滞可燃物 100 h time lag combustibles | 总负荷量 Total load |
---|---|---|---|---|
对照样地 Control plot | 0.927±0.353a | 0.201±0.027a | 0.081±0.037a | 1.073±0.427a |
轻度火烧 Mild fire | 0.727±0.394ab | 0.139±0.056b | 0.072±0.027ab | 0.954±0.441ab |
重度火烧 Severe fire | 0.508±0.269b | 0.074±0.018c | 0.042±0.016b | 0.584±0.312b |
可燃物类型 Types of combustibles | 郁闭度 Canopy closure | 胸径 Breast diameter | 树高 Tree height | 火烧程度 Degree of fire | 坡位 Slope position |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 h时滞可燃物 1 h time lag combustibles | 0.582** | 0.731** | 0.429* | -0.459* | -0.127 |
10 h时滞可燃物 10 h time lag combustibles | 0.383* | 0.426* | 0.150 | -0.827** | 0.199 |
100 h时滞可燃物 100 h time lag combustibles | 0.365* | 0.746** | 0.357* | -0.506* | -0.272 |
总负荷量 Total load | 0.592** | 0.686** | 0.414* | -0.466* | -0.162 |
Table 3 Correlation coefficients between combustible load and impact factors
可燃物类型 Types of combustibles | 郁闭度 Canopy closure | 胸径 Breast diameter | 树高 Tree height | 火烧程度 Degree of fire | 坡位 Slope position |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 h时滞可燃物 1 h time lag combustibles | 0.582** | 0.731** | 0.429* | -0.459* | -0.127 |
10 h时滞可燃物 10 h time lag combustibles | 0.383* | 0.426* | 0.150 | -0.827** | 0.199 |
100 h时滞可燃物 100 h time lag combustibles | 0.365* | 0.746** | 0.357* | -0.506* | -0.272 |
总负荷量 Total load | 0.592** | 0.686** | 0.414* | -0.466* | -0.162 |
可燃物类型 Types of combustibles | 常数 Constant | 火烧程度(X1) Fire degree (X1) | 胸径(X2) Breast diameter (X2) | 郁闭度(X3) Canopy closure (X4) | 坡位(X4) Slope position (X5) | 调整后R2 Adjusted R2 | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 h | -0.248 | -0.080 | 0.096 | 0.665 | 0.000 | 0.601 | 0.000 |
10 h | 0.160 | -0.061 | 0.000 | 0.094 | 0.000 | 0.688 | 0.032 |
100 h | 0.028 | -0.013 | 0.009 | 0.000 | -0.010 | 0.702 | 0.000 |
总负荷量 Total load | 0.037 | -0.166 | 0.086 | 0.793 | 0.000 | 0.629 | 0.000 |
Table 4 Multiple regression model parameters
可燃物类型 Types of combustibles | 常数 Constant | 火烧程度(X1) Fire degree (X1) | 胸径(X2) Breast diameter (X2) | 郁闭度(X3) Canopy closure (X4) | 坡位(X4) Slope position (X5) | 调整后R2 Adjusted R2 | P值 P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 h | -0.248 | -0.080 | 0.096 | 0.665 | 0.000 | 0.601 | 0.000 |
10 h | 0.160 | -0.061 | 0.000 | 0.094 | 0.000 | 0.688 | 0.032 |
100 h | 0.028 | -0.013 | 0.009 | 0.000 | -0.010 | 0.702 | 0.000 |
总负荷量 Total load | 0.037 | -0.166 | 0.086 | 0.793 | 0.000 | 0.629 | 0.000 |
[1] |
BURROWS N D, MCCAW W L, 1990. Fuelcharacteristics and bushfire control in banksia low woodlands in Western Australia[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 31(3): 229-236.
DOI URL |
[2] |
DUFF T J, BELLl T L, YORK A, 2013. Predicting continuous variation in forest fuel load using biophysical models: A case study in south-eastern Australia[J]. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 22(3): 318-332.
DOI URL |
[3] |
GAO Q, YU M, 2021. Canopy density and roughness differentiate resistance of a tropical dry forest to major hurricane damage[J]. Remote Sensing, 13(12): 2262.
DOI URL |
[4] |
JOHNSTON D C, TURETSKY M R, BENSCOTER B W, 2015. Fuel load, structure, and potential fire behaviour in black spruce bogs[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 45(7): 888-899.
DOI URL |
[5] |
ROSA L, ADRIANO S, LUCIANO T, 2000. Time-clustering analysis of forest-fire sequences in southern Italy[J]. Chaos Solitons & Fractals, 24(1): 139-149.
DOI URL |
[6] |
STAMBAUGH M C, DEY D C, GUYETTE R P, et al., 2011. Spatial patterning of fuels and fire hazard across a central U.S. deciduous forest region[J]. Landscape Ecology, 26(7): 923-935.
DOI URL |
[7] |
TROUVÉ R, OBOME L, BAKER P J, 2021. The effect of species, size, and fire intensity on tree mortality within a catastrophic bushfire complex[J]. Ecological Applications, DOI: 10.1002/eap.2383.
DOI |
[8] | YAVUZ M, SAGLAM B, KUCUK O, et al., 2015. Assessing fuel load and fireline intensity in Bayam forest district, Turkey using Flam Map software and remote sensing techniquies[C]// International Forest Fire Conference in Black Sea Region: 6-8. |
[9] | 曹慧, 2016. 火烧对油松天然林林下植被及土壤的影响[D]. 太原: 山西农业大学. |
CAO H, 2016. The effect of fire on the understory vegetation and soil of Pinus tabulaeformis natural forest[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi Agricultural University. | |
[10] | 陈根云, 俞冠路, 陈悦, 等, 2006. 光合作用对光和二氧化碳响应的观测方法探讨[J]. 植物生理与分子生物学学报, 32(6): 691-696. |
CHEN G Y, YU G L, CHEN Y, et al., 2006. Discussion on the Observation Method of Photosynthesis Response to Light and Carbon Dioxide[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 32(6): 691-696. | |
[11] | 陈宏伟, 常禹, 胡远满, 等, 2008. 大兴安岭呼中林区森林死可燃物载量及其影响因子[J]. 生态学杂志, 27(1): 50-55. |
CHEN H W, CHANG Y, HU Y M, et al., 2008. The forest dead fuel load and its influencing factors in the Huzhong forest area of Daxinganling Mountains[J]. Journal of Ecology, 27(1): 50-55. | |
[12] | 高国平, 郗娜, 冯莹, 2001. 辽东地区森林地被可燃物载量的调查研究[J]. 辽宁林业科技 (2): 10-13. |
GAO G P, XI N, FENG Y, 2001. Investigation and Research on the Fuel Load of Forest Land in Eastern Liaoning[J]. Liaoning Forestry Science and Technology (2): 10-13. | |
[13] | 国务院大兴安岭灾区恢复生产重建家园领导小组专家组, 1987. 大兴安岭特大森林火灾恢复森林资源和生态环境考察报告汇编[R]. 北京: 中国林业出版社. |
Expert Group of the State Council Leading Group for the Restoration of Production and Reconstruction of Homeland in the Disaster Area of Daxinganling, 1987. Compilation of Investigation Reports on Forest Resources and Ecological Environment Restoration by Large-scale Forest Fire in Daxinganling [R]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. | |
[14] | 郭福涛, 苏漳文, 马祥庆, 等, 2015. 大兴安岭塔河地区雷击火发生驱动因子综合分析[J]. 生态学报, 35(19): 6439-6448. |
GUO F T, SU Z W, MA X Q, et al., 2015. Comprehensive analysis of driving factors for lightning fire in Tahe area of Daxinganling[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(19): 6439-6448. | |
[15] | 郭利峰, 牛树奎, 阚振国, 2007. 北京八达岭人工油松林地表枯死可燃物负荷量研究[J]. 林业资源管理 (5): 53-58. |
GUO L F, NIU S K, KAN Z G, 2007. Study on the dead fuel load of the artificial Chinese pine forest in Badaling, Beijing[J]. Forest Resources Management (5): 53-58. | |
[16] | 何晓旭, 段绍光, 胡志东, 2013. 豫西伏牛山区油松林地表可燃物研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 28(2): 143-146. |
HE X X, GUAN S G, HU Z D, 2013. Study on Surface Fuels of Pinus tabulaeformis Forest in Funiu Mountain Area, Western Henan[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 28(2): 143-146. | |
[17] | 胡海清, 2005. 利用林分特征因子预测森林地被可燃物载量的研究[J]. 林业科学, 41(5): 96-100. |
HU H Q, 2005. Predicting forest surface fuel load by using forest stand factors[J]. Forestry Science, 41(5): 96-100. | |
[18] | 纪成成, 2020. 2017年11-12月根河市3次寒潮过程的对比分析[J]. 农业灾害研究, 10(1): 100-101, 127. |
JI C C, 2020. Comparative analysis of three cold wave processes in Genhe City from November to December 2017 [J]. Journal of Agricultural Disaster Research, 10(1): 100-101, 127. | |
[19] | 金琳, 刘晓东, 任本才, 等, 2012. 十三陵林场低山林区针叶林地表可燃物负荷量及其影响因子[J]. 林业资源管理, 4(2): 41-46. |
JIN L, LIU X D, REN B C, et al., 2012. The surface fuel load and its influencing factors of coniferous forest in low mountain forest area of Shisanling Forest Farm[J]. Forest Resources Management, 4(2): 41-46. | |
[20] | 李东昌, 2017. 针叶比例、载量和坡度对油松辽东栎凋落叶可燃物火行为的影响研究[D]. 太原: 山西农业大学. |
LI D C, 2017. Study on the Influence of Needle Ratio, Loading Capacity and Slope on the Combustible Fire Behavior of Pinus tabulaeformis and Quercus liaotungensis Litter[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi Agricultural University. | |
[21] | 李璇皓, 2019. 北京市山区主要可燃物类型燃烧性研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学. |
LI X H, 2019. Study on the combustibility of main types of combustibles in mountainous areas in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University. | |
[22] | 梁瀛, 李吉玫, 赵凤君, 等, 2017. 天山中部天山云杉林地表可燃物载量及其影响因素[J]. 林业科学, 53(12): 153-160. |
LIANG Y, LI L M, ZHAO F J, et al., 2017. The surface fuel load and its influencing factors of Tianshan spruce forest in the middle of Tianshan Mountains[J]. Forestry Science, 53(12): 153-160. | |
[23] |
任梅蓉, 杨秋霞, 魏鑫丽, 2019. 东北大小兴安岭地区梅衣科岛衣类和袋衣类地衣物种多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 27(8): 833-841.
DOI |
REN M R, YANG Q X, WEI X L, 2019. Species diversity of clothing and bag clothing on Meiyike Island in Daxing’anling area of Northeast China[J]. Biodiversity, 27(8): 833-841. | |
[24] | 森林资源规划设计调查技术规程: GB/T 26424-2010, 2011. [S]. |
Technical Regulations for Forest Resources Planning, Design and Investigation: GB/T 26424-2010, 2011 [S]. | |
[25] | 单延龙, 关山, 廖光煊, 2006. 长白山林区主要可燃物类型地表可燃物载量分析[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 34(6): 34-36. |
SHAN Y L, GUAN S, LIAO G X, 2006. Analysis of surface combustible material load of main combustibles in Changbai Mountain forest area[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 34(6): 34-36. | |
[26] | 舒立福, 王明玉, 李忠琦, 等, 2004. 大兴安岭山地偃松林火环境研究[J]. 山地学报, 22(1): 36-39. |
SHU L F, WANG M Y, LI Z Q, et al., 2004. Research on Fire Environment of Pine Forest in Daxinganling Mountains[J]. Journal of Mountain Research, 22(1): 36-39. | |
[27] | 舒立福, 王明玉, 田晓瑞, 等, 2003. 我国大兴安岭呼中林区雷击火发生火环境研究[J]. 林业科学, 39(6): 94-99. |
SHU L F, WANG M Y, TIAN X R, et al., 2003. The fire environment mechanism of lightning fire formed for Daxing'an Mountains[J]. Forestry Science, 39(6): 94-99. | |
[28] | 田野, 牛树奎, 陈锋, 等, 2018. 火干扰后的油松林地表死可燃物负荷及影响因子[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 47(6): 691-697. |
TIAN Y, NIU S Q, CHEN F, et al., 2018. Surface dead fuel load and relevant influencing factors of Pinus tabulaeformis forest after fire disturbance[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 47(6): 691-697. | |
[29] | 武超, 罗夏琴, 刘春延, 等, 2013. 不同强度火干扰对兴安落叶松林可燃物载量的影响[J]. 森林工程, 29(5): 24-28. |
WU C, LUO X Q, LIU C Y, et al., 2013. The influence of different intensity fire interference on the combustible material load of Larix gmelini forest[J]. Forest Engineering, 29(5): 24-28. | |
[30] | 闫泳霖, 2016. 五台林区4种林分类型地表可燃物负荷量及其影响因子研究[D]. 太原: 山西农业大学. |
YAN Y L, 2016. Study on the surface fuel load and its influencing factors of 4 forest types in Wutai forest area[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi Agricultural University. | |
[31] | 张国防, 欧文琳, 陈瑞炎, 等, 2000. 杉木人工林地表可燃物负荷量动态模型的研究[J]. 福建林学院学报, 20(2): 133-135. |
ZHANG G F, OU W L, CHEN R Y, et al., 2000. Study on the dynamic model of the surface fuel load of Chinese fir plantation[J]. Fujian Journal of Forestry, 20(2): 133-135. | |
[32] | 张今奇, 周梅, 赵鹏武, 等, 2021. 不同火烧程度火烧迹地死可燃物载量预测模型[J]. 森林工程, 37(3): 21-27, 35. |
ZHANG J Q, ZHOU M, ZHAO P W, et al., 2021. Prediction model of dead combustible material load in different burn levels[J]. Forest Engineering, 37(3): 21-27, 35. | |
[33] | 周涧青, 刘晓东, 张思玉, 2019. 兴安落叶松人工林地表可燃物分布研究[J]. 森林防火 (1): 19-23. |
ZHOU J Q, LIU X D, ZHANG S Y, 2019. Study on the Distribution of Surface Combustible Matter in Larix gmelini Plantation[J]. Forest Fire Prevention (1): 19-23. |
[1] | WENG Shengheng, ZHANG Yuqin, JIANG Dongxin, PAN Weihua, LI Lichun, ZHANG Fangmin. Spatio-temporal Changes and Attribution Analysis of Net Ecosystem Productivity in Forest Ecosystem in Fujian Province [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 845-856. |
[2] | WANG Chao, YANG Qiannan, ZHANG Chi, LIU Tongxu, ZHANG Xialong, CHEN Jing, LIU Kexue. The Characteristics of Soil Phosphorus Fractions and Their Availability under Different Land Use Types in Danxia Mountain [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(5): 889-897. |
[3] | LI Weiwen, HUANG Jinquan, QI Yujie, LIU Xiaolan, LIU Jigen, MAO Zhichao, GAO Xiufang. Meta-analysis of Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon Content and Its Influencing Factors under Soil Erosion [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(1): 47-55. |
[4] | ZHAO Rui, ZHAN Liping, ZHOU Liang, ZHANG Junke. Identification of Driving Factors of PM2.5 Based on Geographic Detector Combined with Geographically Weighted Ridge Regression [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(2): 307-317. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn