China's Ecological Conservation Redline: Evaluation Method and Application of Protection Effect in Chongqing

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.07.022

Ecology and Environment ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 1532-1540.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.07.022

• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles

China's Ecological Conservation Redline: Evaluation Method and Application of Protection Effect in Chongqing

QI Jing¹(), DENG Wei¹^,²^,^*(), ZHOU Yu¹, LIU Ting¹, LUO Xu¹

1. Chongqing Academy of Environment Science, Chongqing 400020, China
2. Chongqing (Yangtze River) Ecological Protection and High-Quality Development Research Center, Chongqing 401147, China

Received:2021-01-21 Online:2021-07-18 Published:2021-10-09
Contact: DENG Wei

重庆市生态保护红线成效评估方法与应用

齐静¹(), 邓伟¹^,²^,^*(), 周渝¹, 刘婷¹, 罗旭¹

1.重庆市生态环境科学研究院,重庆 401120
2.长江（重庆）生态保护与高质量发展研究中心,重庆 401120

通讯作者: 邓伟
作者简介:齐静（1989年生）,女,工程师,硕士,主要从事生态遥感评估和生态空间规划。E-mail: 20122002001@cqu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金项目(20XSH015);重庆市生态环境局科技专项“成渝地区生态环境标准统一研究”

Abstract

Abstract:

Ecological conservation redline (ECR) is the lifeline for safeguarding and maintaining national ecological security, also a major strategy of construction of ecological civilization of China. The national top-level design has been completed, how to fine evaluate the protection effect of the ECR has become a concern issue for ensuring the effect of county policy implementation. In this study, based on the national requirements for ECR, using the method of ecosystem service value (ESV), grading system, comprehensive index, around the area, land usage, ecological function, regulation ability and the local characteristic, established an evaluation index system and assessment method for the effect of the ECR. An case is demonstrated by using the model which gets excellent effects. Example reflects that the protection effect in the study area was slightly improving. Composite index increased from 100 to 105.2. From the type of indicator, Except for the area of human activity, all indexes remained the stabled or tended to be better. The most obvious increase was the index of local characteristic, from 10 to 14.5. The case demonstrates that the evaluation index system has stronger operability and local adaptability, the evaluation method realizes the fine evaluate the protection effect of the ECR. The results of assessing ECR protection effectiveness can provide technical support for establish the ECR government performance evaluation, and also give an important basis for the ECR eco-compensation, off-office auditing of cadres, rewards or punishments, duty-charging, and so on.

Key words: ecological conservation redline, protection effectiveness, ecosystem services value (ESV), ecological security, Chongqing

摘要：

生态保护红线是国家生态安全保障和生态安全格局构建的基准线,是一项地位十分重要的国家生态保护战略。开展定期评估、建立考核机制是“严守”生态保护红线的重要部分之一。目前,国家层面顶层设计已完成,如何精细化评估区、县（市）生态保护红线的保护成效和工作落实情况,服务于各区、县（市）生态保护红线的监管和绩效考核,成为关注的热点问题和“严守”生态保护红线的重大需求之一。该研究依据国家对生态保护红线的管控要求,充分考虑管理决策和地方适应性等因素,从生态保护红线面积、用地性质、生态功能、监管能力、地方化特征等角度,综合运用生态系统服务价值量核算、指标打分、综合指数等方法,构建了涵盖5大类、15小项的生态保护红线成效评估指标体系和评估方法,并进行了实例论证。重庆市生态保护红线案例应用显示,5年间,区域内生态保护成效处于轻度好转趋势,综合成效指数由100分增至105.2分;各大类指标指数除人类活动面积指标有所下降外,其他指标均处于不变或者趋于向好的状态,增长最为明显的为地方化特征指数,由10分增至14.5分。研究表明建立的生态保护红线指标体系具有较强的操作性和地方适应性,评估方法实现了结果的精细化、定量化,结果可为重庆市政府生态保护红线绩效考核制度的建立提供有力科学支撑,为重庆市生态保护红线生态补偿、领导干部离任审计、奖惩任免、责任追究等监管制度的建立提供重要依据。

关键词: 生态保护红线, 生态保护成效评估, 生态系统服务价值, 生态安全, 重庆市

CLC Number:

QI Jing, DENG Wei, ZHOU Yu, LIU Ting, LUO Xu. China's Ecological Conservation Redline: Evaluation Method and Application of Protection Effect in Chongqing[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(7): 1532-1540.

齐静, 邓伟, 周渝, 刘婷, 罗旭. 重庆市生态保护红线成效评估方法与应用[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(7): 1532-1540.

Figures/Tables 5

References 20

[1]	邓伟, 齐静, 孙荣, 等, 2018. 生态功能保护条件下的重庆市生态保护红线划分[J]. 水土保持通报, 38(5): 160-166.
	DENG W, QI J, SUN R, et al., 2018. Division of ecological protection redlines in Chongqing Municipality under protection of ecological function[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 38(5): 160-166.
[2]	邓伟, 周渝, 张勇, 等, 2020. 重庆市生态保护红线区生态系统服务价值时空演变特征及其驱动[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 29(1): 79-89.
	DENG W, ZHOU Y, ZHANG Y, et al., 2020. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of ecosystem service value in Chongqing Ecological Red Line Area[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 29(1): 79-89.
[3]	范小杉, 张强, 刘煜杰, 2014. 生态红线管控绩效考核技术方案及制度保障研究[J]. 中国环境管理, 6(4): 18-23.
	FAN X S, ZHANG Q, LIU Y J, 2014. Research on framework and program to assess management performance of Ecological Redlines[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 6(4): 18-23.
[4]	高吉喜, 2014. 国家生态保护红线体系建设构想[J]. 环境保护, 42(Z1): 17-21.
	GAO J X, 2014. Construction of chinese system for Ecol-Redline[J]. Environmental Protection, 42(Z1): 17-21.
[5]	高吉喜, 鞠昌华, 邹长新, 2017. 构建严格的生态保护红线管控制度体系[J]. 中国环境管理, 9(1): 14-17.
	GAO J X, JU C H, ZHOU C X, 2017. Construction of management and control system for ecol-redline[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 9(1): 14-17.
[6]	侯鹏, 王桥, 杨旻, 等, 2018. 生态保护红线成效评估框架与指标方法[J]. 地理研究, 37(10): 1927-1937. DOI
	HOU P, WANG Q, YANG M, et al., 2018. China’s ecological protection redlines: Evaluation framework and method of protection effect[J]. Geographical Research, 37(10): 1927-1937.
[7]	江波, 王晓媛, 杨梦斐, 等, 2019. 生态系统服务研究在生态红线政策保护成效评估中的应用[J]. 生态学报, 39(9): 3365-3371.
	JIANG B, WANG X Y, YANG M F, et al., 2019. Application of ecosystem services research on a protection effectiveness evaluation of the ecological redline policy[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(9): 3365-3371.
[8]	刘谞承, 张音波, 苏耀明, 2016. 生态保护红线成效评估方法与考核机制的探讨[C]// 中国环境科学学会. 中国环境科学学会学术年会论文集 (第2卷). 海口:762-765.
	LIU X C, ZHANG Y B, SU Y M, 2016. Evaluation method and Assessment mechanism of ecological red line protection effect[C]// Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences (Vol.2).Haikou:762-765.
[9]	莫张勤, 2016. 生态红线法律制度的障碍及对策研究[J]. 生态经济, 32(12): 19-22, 27.
	MO Z Q, 2016. Study on obstacles and countermeasures of the legal system of the Ecological Red Line[J]. Ecological Economy, 32(12): 19-22, 27.
[10]	潘耀忠, 史培军, 朱文泉, 等, 2004. 中国陆地生态系统服务价值测量[J]. 应用生态学报, 34(4): 375-385.
	PAN Y Z, SHI P J, ZHU W Q, et al., 2004. Measurement of terrestrial ecosystem service value in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 34(4): 375-385.
[11]	汪朝霞, 2019. 基于GIS格网模型的重庆市生态安全时空格局研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆师范大学.
	WANG C X, 2019. Spatic-temporal pattern of ecological security in Chongqing based on GIS grid model[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Normal University.
[12]	王筱春, 夏雪, 雷轩, 2020. 基于生态保护红线的滇池流域生态空间管控[J]. 经济地理, 40(5): 191-197.
	WANG X C, XIA X, LEI X, 2020. Ecological space control of Dianchi Lake Basin based on ecological protection red line[J]. Economic Geography, 40(5): 191-197.
[13]	肖峰, 贾倩倩, 2016. 论我国生态保护红线制度的应然功能及其实现[J]. 中国地质大学学报 (社会科学版), 16(6): 34-45.
	XIAO F, JIA Q Q, 2016. Study on the ought function of a redline system[J]. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition), 16(6): 34-45.
[14]	徐德琳, 邹长新, 林乃峰, 等, 2020. 生态保护红线保护成效评估指标体系构建[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 36(12): 1562-1568.
	XU D L, ZOU C X, LIN N F, et al., 2020. Building an evaluation indicator system for assessing the protection effectiveness of ecological conserva-tion redline[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 36(12): 1562-1568.
[15]	俞仙炯, 崔旺来, 邓云成, 等, 2017. 海岛生态保护红线制度建构初探[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 159(6): 115-121.
	YU X J, CUI W L, DENG Y C, et al., 2017. A Study on the construction of a redline system for island ecological protection[J]. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 159(6): 115-121.
[16]	曾文革, 赵梦辉, 2016. 生态保护红线政府绩效评估制度构建探究[J]. 河南牧业经济学院学报, 29(1): 49-53.
	ZENG W G, ZHAO M H, 2016. Study on the construction of ecological conserva-tion redline[J]. Journal of Henan Institute of Animal Husbandry Economics, 29(1): 49-53.
[17]	查东平, 蔡海生, 廖兵, 等, 2020. 江西省生态保护红线保护成效评估研究[J]. 江西科学, 38(5): 781-787.
	ZHA D P, CAI H S, LIAO B, et al., 2020. Study on the evaluation of the effect of ecological protection red line in Jiangxi Province[J]. Jiangxi Science, 38(5): 781-787.
[18]	张艳军, 官冬杰, 翟俊, 等, 2017. 重庆市生态系统服务功能价值时空变化研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 37(3): 1169-1177.
	ZHANG Y J, GUAN D J, ZHAI J, et al., 2017. Spatial and temporal variations of ecosystem services value in Chongqing City[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 37(3): 1169-1177.
[19]	张雪飞, 王传胜, 李萌, 2019. 国土空间规划中生态空间和生态保护红线的划定[J]. 地理研究, 38(10): 2430-2446. DOI
	ZHANG X F, WANG C S, LI M, 2019. Demarcating ecological space and ecological protection red line under the framework of territory spatial planning[J]. Geographical Research, 38(10): 2430-2446.
[20]	邹长新, 林乃峰, 徐梦佳, 2017. 论生态保护红线制度实施中的重点问题[J]. 环境保护, 45(23): 36-39.
	ZOU C X, LIN N F, XU M J, 2017. Discussion on the key issues in the implementation of ecological protection redlines[J]. Environmental Protection, 45(23): 36-39.

类别Indicator types	一级指标权重 First level index weight		评估指标 Evaluation indicators			二级指标权重 Second-level index weight		评估方法 Evaluation method		指标性质 Index properties
面积 Area	0.1		生态保护红线面积比例 Proportion of the ecological conservation redline/%			1		生态保护红线面积占行政区幅员面积的比例 The proportion of the ecological conservation redline area to the total area of the administrative region		一票否决性 One-vote veto
用地性质 Land usage	0.3		人类活动影响面积 The area affected by human activities/km²			0.5		生态保护红线内各类型新增与规模扩大人类活动的面积 The area of newly increased human activities within the ecological conservation redline		负向 Negative
用地性质 Land usage	0.3		自然生态用地面积比例 Proportion of the ecological field/%			0.5		生态保护红线内,林地、灌丛、草地、湿地、荒漠、农田等自然生态用地的面积占生态保护红线面积的比例 The proportion of natural ecological land such as woodland, shrubland, grassland, wetland, desert, and farmland within the ecological conservation redline		正向 Positive
生态功能 Ecological functions	0.4		生态保护修复面积 The area of the ecological restoration/km²			0.1		生态保护红线内各类型人类活动及设施清退、生态修复治理的面积 The area of engineering facilities clearance and ecological restoration within the ecological conservation redline		正向 Positive
			植被覆盖指数 Vegetation coverage index			0.1		生态保护红线内森林、草地、湿地等有植被覆盖区域的生长季平均植被覆盖度 The average vegetation coverage in the growing season of forests, grasslands, wetlands and other vegetation-covered areas within the ecological conservation redline		正向 Positive
			生态系统服务价值 (亿元) ecosystem services value (billion)		供给服务 Supply service	0.7		$\mathrm{ESV=}\sum\limits_{f=1}^{n}{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{{{A}_{i}}}}\times \mathrm{V}{{\mathrm{C}}_{fi}}$ ESV表示生态系统的总服务价值,yuan∙a^-1;VC_fi第i种生态系统类型的的f项生态系统服务价值系数,yuan∙hm^-2∙a^-1;A_i为i类生态系统类型面积,hm² $\mathrm{V}{{\mathrm{C}}_{j}}\mathrm{=}\frac{{{n}_{j}}}{{{N}_{j}}}\times \frac{{{f}_{j}}}{{{F}_{j}}}\times {{V}_{0}}\times \mathrm{V}{{\mathrm{C}}_{0}}$ 式中,VC_j为第j年研究区生态服务价值系数,yuan∙hm^-2∙a^-1;n_i为第i年研究区生物量,N_j为第j年我国的平均生物量;f_j为第j年研究区植被覆盖度年均值,F_j为第j年我国的植被覆盖度年均值;V₀为中国生态系统服务单位面积价值当量;VC₀为重庆市农田的生产服务经济价值,yuan∙hm^-2∙a^-1。由于大区域尺度生物量无法完全精确获取,参考潘耀忠等（2004）的研究成果,采用净初级生产力（Net Primary Production,NPP）数据代替。VC₀参考邓伟等（2020）研究成果,修正系数取1.036,即重庆市的一个生态系统服务当量价值为3528.79 yuan∙hm^-2 ESV: Total service value of the ecosystem, yuan∙a^-1. VC_fi: The f-item ecosystem service value coefficient of the i-item ecosystem type, yuan∙hm^-2∙a^-1. A_i: The area of ecosystem type i, hm². VC_j: Ecological service value coefficient of the study area in year i, yuan∙hm^-2∙a^-1. n_i: Biomass of study area in year i. N_j: China's average biomass in year j. f_j: VFC of study area in year j. F_j: China's average VFC in year j. V₀: Value equivalent per unit area of China's ecosystem services. VC₀: Economic Value of Production Service of Farmland in Chongqing, yuan∙hm^-2·a^-1. Due to the large area-scale biomass cannot be completely accurately obtained, refer to the research results of Pan Yaozhong, use Net Primary Production (NPP) data instead (Pan et al., 2004).With reference to the research results of Deng et al. (2020) and others, the correction coefficient is 1.036, that is, the equivalent value of an ecosystem service in Chongqing is 3528.79 yuan∙hm^-2		正向 Positive
					调节服务 Regulating services					正向 Positive
					支持服务 Support services					正向 Positive
					文化服务Cultural services					正向 Positive
			景观格局指数 Landscape pattern index (AWMPFD)			0.1		应用Fragstats软件的栅格版本中或者Arcgis的Patch analysis插件中计算 Use the raster version of Fragstats or Arcgis Patch analysis		正向 Positive
类别Indicator types		一级指标权重 First level index weight		评估指标 Evaluation indicators			二级指标权重 Second-level index weight		评估方法 Evaluation method		指标性质 Index properties
Regulation ability		0.1		生态保护红线制度与落实 The establishment and implementation of the ecological conservation redline			0.6		地方上报生态保护红线制度制定及相关制度落实情况文件和资料 Documents and materials of local government on the redline system and implementation of ecological protection		正向 Positive
				公众满意度 Public satisfaction index (PSI)/%			0.4		采用《生态保护红线监管技术规范保护成效评估 (试行)》国家标准中的公众满意度调查表进行调查统计 Use the public satisfaction survey form in the national standard of the Protection effectiveness evaluation to conduct surveys and statistics		正向 Positive
				生态破坏与环境污染事件Ecological destruction and environmental pollution incidents			*		地方上报生态破坏与环境污染事件信息,综合国家突发环境事件数据、“绿盾行动”数据等相关数据 Local reporting of ecological damage and environmental pollution incidents and other relevant data		负向 Negative
Localization feature		0.1		长江三峡消落带自然岸线保有率 The retention rate of natural shoreline in the Three Gorges Fluctuating Zone of the Yangtze River/%			0.5		生态保护红线区域内划入岸线保护区、岸线保留区的岸线长度占长江总岸线长度的比例 The proportion of the coastline length of the coastline protection area and coastline reservation area in the ecological conversation redline area to the total coastline length of the Yangtze River		正向 Positive
Localization feature		0.1		生态保护红线监管经费投入Ecological conservation redline supervision fund investment			0.5		生态环境主管部门当年对生态保护红线投入的用于生态保护红线监管的经费数额 The amount of funds invested in the supervision of the ecological conservation redline		正向 Positive

类别Indicator types	一级指标权重 First level index weight		评估指标 Evaluation indicators			二级指标权重 Second-level index weight		评估方法 Evaluation method		指标性质 Index properties
面积 Area	0.1		生态保护红线面积比例 Proportion of the ecological conservation redline/%			1		生态保护红线面积占行政区幅员面积的比例 The proportion of the ecological conservation redline area to the total area of the administrative region		一票否决性 One-vote veto
用地性质 Land usage	0.3		人类活动影响面积 The area affected by human activities/km²			0.5		生态保护红线内各类型新增与规模扩大人类活动的面积 The area of newly increased human activities within the ecological conservation redline		负向 Negative
用地性质 Land usage	0.3		自然生态用地面积比例 Proportion of the ecological field/%			0.5		生态保护红线内,林地、灌丛、草地、湿地、荒漠、农田等自然生态用地的面积占生态保护红线面积的比例 The proportion of natural ecological land such as woodland, shrubland, grassland, wetland, desert, and farmland within the ecological conservation redline		正向 Positive
生态功能 Ecological functions	0.4		生态保护修复面积 The area of the ecological restoration/km²			0.1		生态保护红线内各类型人类活动及设施清退、生态修复治理的面积 The area of engineering facilities clearance and ecological restoration within the ecological conservation redline		正向 Positive
			植被覆盖指数 Vegetation coverage index			0.1		生态保护红线内森林、草地、湿地等有植被覆盖区域的生长季平均植被覆盖度 The average vegetation coverage in the growing season of forests, grasslands, wetlands and other vegetation-covered areas within the ecological conservation redline		正向 Positive
			生态系统服务价值 (亿元) ecosystem services value (billion)		供给服务 Supply service	0.7		$\mathrm{ESV=}\sum\limits_{f=1}^{n}{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{{{A}_{i}}}}\times \mathrm{V}{{\mathrm{C}}_{fi}}$ ESV表示生态系统的总服务价值,yuan∙a^-1;VC_fi第i种生态系统类型的的f项生态系统服务价值系数,yuan∙hm^-2∙a^-1;A_i为i类生态系统类型面积,hm² $\mathrm{V}{{\mathrm{C}}_{j}}\mathrm{=}\frac{{{n}_{j}}}{{{N}_{j}}}\times \frac{{{f}_{j}}}{{{F}_{j}}}\times {{V}_{0}}\times \mathrm{V}{{\mathrm{C}}_{0}}$ 式中,VC_j为第j年研究区生态服务价值系数,yuan∙hm^-2∙a^-1;n_i为第i年研究区生物量,N_j为第j年我国的平均生物量;f_j为第j年研究区植被覆盖度年均值,F_j为第j年我国的植被覆盖度年均值;V₀为中国生态系统服务单位面积价值当量;VC₀为重庆市农田的生产服务经济价值,yuan∙hm^-2∙a^-1。由于大区域尺度生物量无法完全精确获取,参考潘耀忠等（2004）的研究成果,采用净初级生产力（Net Primary Production,NPP）数据代替。VC₀参考邓伟等（2020）研究成果,修正系数取1.036,即重庆市的一个生态系统服务当量价值为3528.79 yuan∙hm^-2 ESV: Total service value of the ecosystem, yuan∙a^-1. VC_fi: The f-item ecosystem service value coefficient of the i-item ecosystem type, yuan∙hm^-2∙a^-1. A_i: The area of ecosystem type i, hm². VC_j: Ecological service value coefficient of the study area in year i, yuan∙hm^-2∙a^-1. n_i: Biomass of study area in year i. N_j: China's average biomass in year j. f_j: VFC of study area in year j. F_j: China's average VFC in year j. V₀: Value equivalent per unit area of China's ecosystem services. VC₀: Economic Value of Production Service of Farmland in Chongqing, yuan∙hm^-2·a^-1. Due to the large area-scale biomass cannot be completely accurately obtained, refer to the research results of Pan Yaozhong, use Net Primary Production (NPP) data instead (Pan et al., 2004).With reference to the research results of Deng et al. (2020) and others, the correction coefficient is 1.036, that is, the equivalent value of an ecosystem service in Chongqing is 3528.79 yuan∙hm^-2		正向 Positive
					调节服务 Regulating services					正向 Positive
					支持服务 Support services					正向 Positive
					文化服务Cultural services					正向 Positive
			景观格局指数 Landscape pattern index (AWMPFD)			0.1		应用Fragstats软件的栅格版本中或者Arcgis的Patch analysis插件中计算 Use the raster version of Fragstats or Arcgis Patch analysis		正向 Positive
类别Indicator types		一级指标权重 First level index weight		评估指标 Evaluation indicators			二级指标权重 Second-level index weight		评估方法 Evaluation method		指标性质 Index properties
Regulation ability		0.1		生态保护红线制度与落实 The establishment and implementation of the ecological conservation redline			0.6		地方上报生态保护红线制度制定及相关制度落实情况文件和资料 Documents and materials of local government on the redline system and implementation of ecological protection		正向 Positive
				公众满意度 Public satisfaction index (PSI)/%			0.4		采用《生态保护红线监管技术规范保护成效评估 (试行)》国家标准中的公众满意度调查表进行调查统计 Use the public satisfaction survey form in the national standard of the Protection effectiveness evaluation to conduct surveys and statistics		正向 Positive
				生态破坏与环境污染事件Ecological destruction and environmental pollution incidents			*		地方上报生态破坏与环境污染事件信息,综合国家突发环境事件数据、“绿盾行动”数据等相关数据 Local reporting of ecological damage and environmental pollution incidents and other relevant data		负向 Negative
Localization feature		0.1		长江三峡消落带自然岸线保有率 The retention rate of natural shoreline in the Three Gorges Fluctuating Zone of the Yangtze River/%			0.5		生态保护红线区域内划入岸线保护区、岸线保留区的岸线长度占长江总岸线长度的比例 The proportion of the coastline length of the coastline protection area and coastline reservation area in the ecological conversation redline area to the total coastline length of the Yangtze River		正向 Positive
Localization feature		0.1		生态保护红线监管经费投入Ecological conservation redline supervision fund investment			0.5		生态环境主管部门当年对生态保护红线投入的用于生态保护红线监管的经费数额 The amount of funds invested in the supervision of the ecological conservation redline		正向 Positive

类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	指标对应分值 Grading system
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	16		14		12	10		One-vote veto
面积 Area	生态保护红线面积比例Proportion of the ecological conservation redline	X≥1.05		1.025≤X<1.05		1.005≤X<1.025	1≤X<1.005		X<1
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	指标对应分值 Grading system
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	36	33			30	20		0
用地性质 Land usage	人类活动影响面积 The area affected by human activities	X<0.925	0.925≤X<0.975			0.975≤X<1.025	1.025≤X<1.075		X≥1.075
用地性质 Land usage	自然生态用地面积比例Proportion of the ecological field	X≥1.015	1.005≤X<1.015			0.995≤X<1.005	0.985≤X<0.995		X<0.985
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	指标对应分值 Grading system
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	46	43			40	25		0
生态功能 Ecological functions	生态保护修复面积 The area of the ecological restoration	X≥1.015	1.005≤X<1.015			0.995≤X<1.005	0.985≤X<0.995		X<0.985
	植被覆盖指数 Vegetation coverage index	X≥1.015	1.005≤X< 1.015			0.995≤X< 1.005	0.985≤X< 0.995		X<0.985
	供给服务 Supply service	X≥1.015	1.005≤X<1.015			0.995≤X<1.005	0.985≤X<0.995		X<0.985
	调节服务 Regulating services	X≥1.015	1.005≤X<1.015			0.995≤X<1.005	0.985≤X<0.995		X<0.985
	支持服务 Support services	X≥1.015	1.005≤X< 1.015			0.995≤X< 1.005	0.985≤X< 0.995		X<0.985
	文化服务 Cultural services	X≥1.015	1.005≤X<1.015			0.995≤X<1.005	0.985≤X<0.995		X<0.985
	景观格局指数 Landscape pattern index (AWMPFD)	X<0.925	0.925≤X< 0.975			0.975≤X< 1.025	1.025≤X< 1.075		X≥1.125
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	指标对应分值 Grading system
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	16			13	10		5	0
管理能力 Regulation ability	生态保护红线制度与落实 The establishment and implementation of the ecological conservation redline	出台相关法律法规、政策制度、规划计划,并纳入空间管控相关规划、项目准入、绩效考核等中,根据保护需求不断完善、落实效果突出 Relevant laws and regulations, policies and systems, planning and planning have been introduced, and related plans such as space control, project access and performance appraisal have been incorporated. These plans have been continuously improved according to the needs of protection, and the implementation has achieved remarkable results			出台相关法律法规、政策制度、规划计划,并纳入空间管控相关规划、项目准入、绩效考核等中,并按照要求落实 Relevant laws and regulations, policies and systems, and plans have been incorporated into relevant planning, project access, and performance appraisal of space management and control, and implemented in accordance with requirements	出台相关法律法规、政策制度、规划计划,并纳入空间管控相关规划、项目准入、绩效考核等中,落实效果一般 Relevant laws and regulations, policies and systems, planning and plans have been introduced, and incorporated into relevant planning of space control, project access, performance appraisal, etc., with general implementation effects		出台相关法律法规、政策制度、规划计划,并纳入空间管控相关规划、项目准入、绩效考核等中,但未落实 Relevant laws and regulations, policies and systems, planning and plans have been introduced and incorporated into relevant planning of space control, project access and performance appraisal, but they have not been implemented	无相关配套法律法规、政策制度、规划计划;或未纳入空间管控相关规划、项目准入、绩效考核等中 No relevant supporting laws and regulations, policies and systems, planning and plans; Or not included in space control planning, project access, performance appraisal, etc
管理能力 Regulation ability	公众满意度 Public satisfaction index (PSI)	X≥1.15			1.05≤X<1.15	0.95≤X<1.05		0.85≤X<0.95	X<0.85
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	指标对应分值 Grading system
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	16		13		10		5	0
地方化特征 Localization feature	长江三峡消落带自然岸线保有率 The retention rate of natural shoreline in the Three Gorges Fluctuating Zone of the Yangtze River	X≥1.125		1.025≤X<1.075		0.975≤X<1.025		0.925≤X<0.975	X<0.925
地方化特征 Localization feature	生态保护红线监管经费投入Ecological conservation redline supervision fund investment	X≥1.15		1.05≤X<1.15		0.95≤X<1.05		0.85≤X<0.95	X<0.85

类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	指标对应分值 Grading system
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	16		14		12	10		One-vote veto
面积 Area	生态保护红线面积比例Proportion of the ecological conservation redline	X≥1.05		1.025≤X<1.05		1.005≤X<1.025	1≤X<1.005		X<1
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	指标对应分值 Grading system
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	36	33			30	20		0
用地性质 Land usage	人类活动影响面积 The area affected by human activities	X<0.925	0.925≤X<0.975			0.975≤X<1.025	1.025≤X<1.075		X≥1.075
用地性质 Land usage	自然生态用地面积比例Proportion of the ecological field	X≥1.015	1.005≤X<1.015			0.995≤X<1.005	0.985≤X<0.995		X<0.985
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	指标对应分值 Grading system
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	46	43			40	25		0
生态功能 Ecological functions	生态保护修复面积 The area of the ecological restoration	X≥1.015	1.005≤X<1.015			0.995≤X<1.005	0.985≤X<0.995		X<0.985
	植被覆盖指数 Vegetation coverage index	X≥1.015	1.005≤X< 1.015			0.995≤X< 1.005	0.985≤X< 0.995		X<0.985
	供给服务 Supply service	X≥1.015	1.005≤X<1.015			0.995≤X<1.005	0.985≤X<0.995		X<0.985
	调节服务 Regulating services	X≥1.015	1.005≤X<1.015			0.995≤X<1.005	0.985≤X<0.995		X<0.985
	支持服务 Support services	X≥1.015	1.005≤X< 1.015			0.995≤X< 1.005	0.985≤X< 0.995		X<0.985
	文化服务 Cultural services	X≥1.015	1.005≤X<1.015			0.995≤X<1.005	0.985≤X<0.995		X<0.985
	景观格局指数 Landscape pattern index (AWMPFD)	X<0.925	0.925≤X< 0.975			0.975≤X< 1.025	1.025≤X< 1.075		X≥1.125
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	指标对应分值 Grading system
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	16			13	10		5	0
管理能力 Regulation ability	生态保护红线制度与落实 The establishment and implementation of the ecological conservation redline	出台相关法律法规、政策制度、规划计划,并纳入空间管控相关规划、项目准入、绩效考核等中,根据保护需求不断完善、落实效果突出 Relevant laws and regulations, policies and systems, planning and planning have been introduced, and related plans such as space control, project access and performance appraisal have been incorporated. These plans have been continuously improved according to the needs of protection, and the implementation has achieved remarkable results			出台相关法律法规、政策制度、规划计划,并纳入空间管控相关规划、项目准入、绩效考核等中,并按照要求落实 Relevant laws and regulations, policies and systems, and plans have been incorporated into relevant planning, project access, and performance appraisal of space management and control, and implemented in accordance with requirements	出台相关法律法规、政策制度、规划计划,并纳入空间管控相关规划、项目准入、绩效考核等中,落实效果一般 Relevant laws and regulations, policies and systems, planning and plans have been introduced, and incorporated into relevant planning of space control, project access, performance appraisal, etc., with general implementation effects		出台相关法律法规、政策制度、规划计划,并纳入空间管控相关规划、项目准入、绩效考核等中,但未落实 Relevant laws and regulations, policies and systems, planning and plans have been introduced and incorporated into relevant planning of space control, project access and performance appraisal, but they have not been implemented	无相关配套法律法规、政策制度、规划计划;或未纳入空间管控相关规划、项目准入、绩效考核等中 No relevant supporting laws and regulations, policies and systems, planning and plans; Or not included in space control planning, project access, performance appraisal, etc
管理能力 Regulation ability	公众满意度 Public satisfaction index (PSI)	X≥1.15			1.05≤X<1.15	0.95≤X<1.05		0.85≤X<0.95	X<0.85
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	指标对应分值 Grading system
类别 Indicator types	评估指标 Evaluation indicators	16		13		10		5	0
地方化特征 Localization feature	长江三峡消落带自然岸线保有率 The retention rate of natural shoreline in the Three Gorges Fluctuating Zone of the Yangtze River	X≥1.125		1.025≤X<1.075		0.975≤X<1.025		0.925≤X<0.975	X<0.925
地方化特征 Localization feature	生态保护红线监管经费投入Ecological conservation redline supervision fund investment	X≥1.15		1.05≤X<1.15		0.95≤X<1.05		0.85≤X<0.95	X<0.85

状态 Changing situation	分值范围 Score range		分级 Classification
下降 Come down	EPE<95	80≤EPE<95	轻度下降 Mild decline
		65≤EPE<80	中度下降 Moderate decline
		EPE<65	严重下降 Severe decline
稳定 Stabilization	95≤EPE≤105	95≤EPE≤105	维持稳定 Maintain stability
好转 Improve	EPE>105	110≥EPE>105	轻度好转 Mild improvement
		125≥EPE>110	中度好转 Moderate improvement
		EPE>125	显著好转 Significantly improved

China's Ecological Conservation Redline: Evaluation Method and Application of Protection Effect in Chongqing

重庆市生态保护红线成效评估方法与应用

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 20

Related Articles 7

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	XU Jing, LIAO Xingkai, GAN Qixu, ZHOU Maoxian. Construction of Ecological Security Pattern Based on MSPA and Circuit Theory in Gansu Section of the Yellow River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(4): 805-813.
[2]	ZHANG Pingjiang, DANG Guofeng. Construction of Ecological Security Pattern of Tao River Basin Based on MCR Model and ant Colony Algorithm [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 481-491.
[3]	LI Yushi, XIA Zhiye, ZHANG Lei. Carbon Emission Prediction and Spatial Optimization of Land Use in Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle in 2030 Based on SSPs Multi-scenarios [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 535-544.
[4]	WEI Jiayi, LI Cheng, WU Zhifeng, ZHANG Li, JI Dongqing, CHENG Jiong. Identifying Ecological Security Patterns and Prioritizing Ecological Corridors in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(4): 652-662.
[5]	WEI Jianbing, ZHENG Hong, CHENG Yulu, WANG Yang. Advances in Research of Ecological Security Patterns, Based on CiteSpace [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(4): 835-844.
[6]	YI Lang, SUN Ying, YIN ShaoHua, WEI Xiao. Construction of Ecological Security Pattern: Concept, Framework and Prospect [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(4): 845-856.
[7]	LEI Jinrui, CHEN Zongzhu, CHEN Yiqing, CHEN Xiaohua, LI Yuanling, WU Tingtian. Dynamic Analysis of Wetland Landscape Ecological Security Pattern of Hainan Island in 1990‒2018 [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2020, 29(2): 293-302.