Construction of Ecological Security Pattern: Concept, Framework and Prospect

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.04.023

Ecology and Environment ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 845-856.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2022.04.023

• Reviews • Previous Articles

Construction of Ecological Security Pattern: Concept, Framework and Prospect

YI Lang¹^,²(), SUN Ying¹^,^*(), YIN ShaoHua³, WEI Xiao²

1. College of Life Science and Technology, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, P. R. China
2. Hunan Institute of Economic Geography/Hunan University of Finance and Economic, Changsha 410205, P. R. China
3. School of Business, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, P. R. China

Received:2021-09-15 Online:2022-04-18 Published:2022-06-22
Contact: SUN Ying

生态安全格局构建：概念、框架与展望

易浪¹^,²(), 孙颖¹^,^*(), 尹少华³, 魏晓²

1.中南林业科技大学生命科学与技术学院,湖南长沙 410004
2.湖南财政经济学院/湖南省经济地理研究所,湖南长沙 410205
3.中南林业科技大学商学院,湖南长沙 410004

通讯作者: 孙颖
作者简介:易浪（1989年生）,男,博士研究生,研究方向为土地利用与景观生态、生态经济管理。E-mail: yilang0107@163.com
基金资助:
2021年湖南省教育厅科学研究项目(21B0258);2019国家社科基金项目(19BJY045)

Abstract

Abstract:

The ecological security pattern is the basis for ensuring regional ecological security and an important means for human beings to maintain green, healthy, and sustainable development. Under the background of increasingly prominent global ecological problems, the ecological security pattern has become a hot area of ecosystem research. Strengthening the study of ecological security pattern is of great significance for maintaining the integrity of the ecosystem structure and function, protecting biodiversity, ensuring regional ecological security, and improving human well-being. Based on “conceptual analyses, fundamental framework, research progress and prospects”, this article comprehensively and systematically reviewed research results on ecological security patterns at home and abroad. The following conclusions were drawn after summarizing the research methods, scales, and contents in the literature: (1) The basic research framework of "source identification-resistance surface construction-corridor extraction" needs to be developed; (2) the identification of ecological source areas lacks a unified scientific standard, and the relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services has not been considered; (3) the extraction method of ecological corridor needs to be further optimized; (4) there is a lack of consideration of the interrelationship between geospatial linkage and ecosystem functions; (5) The research on the coupling relationship between natural ecosystems and socio-economic systems is relatively weak. Future research may focus on the following aspects: (1) integrated research of multi-model, multi-method, and multi-technology; (2) quantitative research on dynamic consideration of ecological safety standards; (3) realistic implementation research of the game of interests of all parties; (4) research on ecological security prediction, early warning, and regulation management; (5) research on the construction of ecological security patterns serving national strategies.

Key words: ecological security, ecological security pattern, source-corridor, pattern optimization, model integration, ecological function area, ecological and environmental governance

摘要：

生态安全格局是保障区域生态安全的基础,是人类维护绿色、健康与可持续发展的重要手段。在全球生态问题日益凸显的背景下,生态安全格局业已成为生态系统研究的热点领域。加强生态安全格局研究对维护生态系统结构与功能完整、保护生物多样性、保障区域生态安全和提升人类福祉具有重要意义。该文从“概念辨析、基础框架、研究进展与展望”等方面入手,全面系统梳理了国内外生态安全格局的相关研究成果,并从“研究方法、研究尺度、研究内容”等方面进行归纳总结,得出以下结论：（1）“源地识别—阻力面构建—廊道提取”的基本研究框架有待发展;（2）生态源地识别缺乏统一的科学标准,对生态系统服务供需关系的考虑未能兼顾;（3）生态廊道提取方法有待进一步优化;（4）地理空间联动性和生态系统功能的相互性考虑欠缺;（5）自然生态系统与社会经济系统间耦合关系研究较为薄弱。未来研究趋势可关注以下方面：（1）多模型、多方法、多技术的集成研究;（2）动态考量生态安全标准的量化研究;（3）各方利益博弈的现实执行研究;（4）生态安全预测、预警与调控管理的强化研究;（5）服务国家战略的生态安全格局构建研究。

关键词: 生态安全, 生态安全格局, 源地-廊道, 格局优化, 模型集成, 生态功能区, 生态环境治理

CLC Number:

Q148
X171.4

YI Lang, SUN Ying, YIN ShaoHua, WEI Xiao. Construction of Ecological Security Pattern: Concept, Framework and Prospect[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(4): 845-856.

易浪, 孙颖, 尹少华, 魏晓. 生态安全格局构建：概念、框架与展望[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 845-856.

Figures/Tables 5

References 76

[1]	BENEDICT M A, MCMAHON E T, 2002. Green infrastructure: Smart conservation for the 21st century[J]. Renewable Resources Journal, 20(3): 12-17.
[2]	CHO S H, POUDYAL N, LAMBERT D M, 2008. Estimating spatially varying effects of urban growth boundaries on land development and land value[J]. Land Use Policy, 25(3): 320-329. DOI URL
[3]	COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, GROOT R D, et al., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 386: 253-260.
[4]	DABELKO G D, DABELKO D D, et al., 1995. Environmental security: Issues of conflict and redefinition[R]. Environmental Change and Security Project Report, 1(1): 3-13.
[5]	DONG J Q, PENG J, LIU Y X, et al., 2020. Integrating Spatial Continuous Wavelet Transform and Kernel Density Estimation to Identify Ecological Corridors in Megacities[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103815. DOI
[6]	ELMQVIST T, FRAGKIAS M, GOODNESS J, et al., 2013. Urbanization biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities[M]. New York & London: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg: 31-52.
[7]	ESBAH H, COOK E A, EWAN J, 2009. Effects of increasing urbanization on the ecological integrity of open space preserves[J]. Environmental Management, 43(5): 846-862. DOI URL
[8]	FORMAN R T T, 1995. Land mosaics: the ecology of land scapes and regions[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[9]	HODSON M, MARVIN S, 2009. ‘Urban ecological security’: A new urban paradigm?[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1): 193-215. DOI URL
[10]	HOSSAIN M S, DEARING J A, EIGENBROD F, et al., 2017. Operationalizing safe operating space for regional social-ecological systems[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 584-586: 673-682.
[11]	JAHANISHAKIB F, SALMANMAHIN Y A, MIRKARIMI S H, et al., 2021. Hydrological connectivity assessment of landscape ecological network to mitigate development impacts[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113169. DOI
[12]	KONG F H, YIN H W, NAKAGOSHI N, et al., 2010. Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: Identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95(1-2): 16-27. DOI URL
[13]	LIU D, CHANG Q, 2015. Ecological security research progress in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(5): 111-121. DOI URL
[14]	MERRIAM G, 1984. Connectivity: A fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern. Methodology in landscape ecological research and planning: proceedings, 1st seminar[J]. International Association of Landscape Ecology, 11: 5-15.
[15]	RICHARD T T, MICHEL G, 1986. Landscape Ecology[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, (1): 10-14.
[16]	STEFFEN W, RICHARDSON K, ROCKSTROM, et al., 2015. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet[J]. Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.1259855. DOI
[17]	SUTTON-GRIER A E, WOWK K, BAMFORD H, 2015. Future of our coasts: the potential for natural and hybrid infrastructure to enhance the resilience of our coastal communities, economies and ecosystems[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 51: 137-148.
[18]	TENG M G, WU C G, ZHOU Z X, et al., 2011. Multipurpose greenway planning for changing cities: A framework integrating priorities and a least-cost path model[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 103(1): 1-14.
[19]	WU Y Z, SUN X F, SUN L S, et al., 2020. Optimizing the governance model of urban villages based on integration of inclusiveness and urban service boundary (USB): A Chinese case study[J]. Cities, DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102427. DOI
[20]	XU X B, TAN Y, CHEN S, et al., 2014. Changing Patterns and determinants of natural capital in the Yangtze River Delta of China 2000-2010 [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 466-467(1): 326-337. DOI URL
[21]	ZHANG L Q, PENG J, LIU Y X, et al., 2017. Coupling ecosystem services supply and human ecological demand to identify landscape ecological security pattern: A case study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 20(3): 1-14. DOI URL
[22]	陈永林, 谢炳庚, 钟典, 等, 2018. 基于微粒群-马尔科夫复合模型的生态空间预测模拟——以长株潭城市群为例[J]. 生态学报, 38(1): 55-64.
	CHEN Y L, XIE B G, ZHONG D, et al., 2018. Predictive simulation of ecological space based on a particle swarm optimization-Markov composite model: A case study for Chang-Zhu-Tan urban agglomerations[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(1): 55-64.
[23]	董张玉, 2014. 基于GIS/RS与多目标蚁群算法的三江平原沼泽湿地空间格局优化[D]. 长春: 中国科学院研究生院 (东北地理与农业生态研究所).
	DONG Z Y, 2014. Spatial pattern optimization of marsh wetland in Sanjiang Plain based on GIS/RS and multi-objective ant colony algorithm[D]. Changchun: Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology).
[24]	范泽孟, 李赛博, 2019. 新亚欧大陆桥经济走廊土地覆被变化及驱动力分析[J]. 生态学报, 39(14): 5015-5027.
	FAN Z M, LI S B, 2019. Change pattern of land cover and its driving force since 2001 in the New Eurasian Continental Bridge Economic Corridor[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(14): 5015-5027.
[25]	方莹, 王静, 黄隆杨, 等, 2020. 基于生态安全格局的国土空间生态保护修复关键区域诊断与识别——以烟台市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 35(1): 190-203.
	FANG Y, WANG J, HUANG L Y, et al., 2020. Determining and identifying key areas of ecosystem preservation and restoration for territorial spatial planning based on ecological security patterns: A case study of Yantai city[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 35(1): 190-203. DOI URL
[26]	冯琰玮, 甄江红, 马晨阳, 2021. 内蒙古生态承载力评价及生态安全格局优化[J]. 地理研究, 40(4): 1096-1110. DOI
	FENG Y W, ZHEN J H, MA C Y, 2021. Evaluation of ecological carrying capacity and optimization of ecological security pattern in Inner Mongolia[J]. Geographical Research, 40(4): 1096-1110.
[27]	傅伯杰, 2010. 我国生态系统研究的发展趋势与优先领域[J]. 地理研究, 29(3): 383-396.
	FU B J, 2010. Trends and priority areas in ecosystem research of China[J]. Geographical Research, 29(3): 383-396.
[28]	韩文权, 常禹, 胡远满, 等, 2005. 景观格局优化研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 24(12): 1487-1492.
	HAN W Q, CHANG Y, HU Y M, et al., 2005. Research advance in landscape pattern optimization[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 24(12): 1487-1492.
[29]	何玲, 贾启建, 李超, 等, 2016. 基于生态系统服务价值和生态安全格局的土地利用格局模拟[J]. 农业工程学报, 32(3): 275-284.
	HE L, JIA Q J, LI C, et al., 2016. Land use pattern simulation based on ecosystem service value and ecological security pattern[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 32(3): 275-284.
[30]	洪步庭, 任平, 苑全治, 等, 2019. 长江上游生态功能区划研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 35(8): 1009-1019.
	HONG B T, REN P, YUAN Q Z, et al., 2019. Ecological Function Regionalization in the Upper Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 35(8): 1009-1019.
[31]	侯大伟, 刘艳, 孙华, 2017. 退耕还林背景下寒地山区土地生态安全格局动态变化[J]. 农业工程学报, 33(18): 267-276.
	HOU D W, LIU Y, SUN H, 2017. Analysis on dynamic change of ecological security pattern of land in cold mountainous region under background of Grain for Green Project[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 33(18): 267-276.
[32]	侯惠珺, 罗丹, 赵鸣, 2016. 基于生态恢复和文化回归的梯田景观格局重建——以菲律宾科迪勒拉高山水稻梯田景观复兴为例[J]. 生态学报, 36(1): 148-155.
	HOU H J, LUO D, ZHAO M, 2016. Reconstruction of landscape pattern on terraces based on the theory of ecological restoration and culture regression for mountain rice terraces in the Philippines Cordillera region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(1): 148-155.
[33]	黄木易, 岳文泽, 方斌, 等, 2019. 1970—2015年大别山区生态服务价值尺度响应特征及地理探测机制[J]. 地理学报, 74(9): 1904-1920. DOI
	HUANG M Y, YUE W Z, FANG B, et al., 2019. Scale response characteristics and geographic exploration mechanism of spatial differentiation of ecosystem service values in Dabie Mountain area, central China from 1970 to 2015 [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(9): 1904-1920. DOI
[34]	黄智洵, 王飞飞, 曹文志, 2018. 耦合生态系统服务供求关系的生态安全格局动态分析——以闽三角城市群为例[J]. 生态学报, 38(12): 4327-4340.
	HUANG Z X, WANG F F, CAO W Z, 2018. Dynamic analysis of an ecological security pattern relying on the relationship between ecosystem service supply and demand: A case study on the Xiamen- Zhangzhou-Quanzhou city cluster[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(12): 4327-4340.
[35]	雷金睿, 陈宗铸, 陈毅青, 等, 2020. 1990—2018年海南岛湿地景观格局演变及其驱动力分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 29(1): 59-70.
	LEI J R, CHEN Z Z, CHEN Y Q, et al., 2020. Landscape Pattern Changes and Driving Factors Analysis of Wetland in Hainan Island during 1990-2018 [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 29(1): 59-70.
[36]	李丹, 田沛佩, 罗红英, 等, 2020. 西藏 “一江两河” 耕地生态安全时空格局与障碍诊断[J]. 农业机械学报, 51(10): 213-222.
	LI D, TIAN P P, LUO H Y, et al., 2020. Spatio-temporal Characteristics and Obstacle Diagnosis of Cultivated Land Ecological Security in “One River and Two Tributaries” Region in Tibet[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 51(10): 213-222.
[37]	李恒凯, 刘玉婷, 李芹, 等, 2020. 基于MCR模型的南方稀土矿区生态安全格局分析[J]. 地理科学, 40(6): 989-998. DOI
	LI H K, LIU Y T, LI Q, et al., 2020. Analysis of Ecological Security Pattern of Southern Rare Earth[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 40(6): 989-998.
[38]	李思旗, 陆汝成, 吴彬, 等, 2021. 基于生态安全格局的喀斯特地区自然资源空间精准分区与管制方法研究——以广西壮族自治区柳州市为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 41(3): 200-209.
	LI S Q, LU R C, WU B, et al., 2021. Spatially accurate zoning and control methods for natural resources in karst region based on ecological security pattern[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 41(3): 200-209.
[39]	李晓文, 胡远满, 肖笃宁, 1999. 景观生态学与生物多样性保护[J]. 生态学报, 19(3): 399-407.
	LI X W, HU Y M, XIAO D N, 1999. Landdscape ecology and biodiversity conservation[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 19(3): 399-407.
[40]	林伊琳, 赵俊三, 陈国平, 等, 2021. 基于MCR-FLUS-Markov模型的区域国土空间格局优化[J]. 农业机械学报, 52(4): 159-170, 207.
	LIN Y L, ZHAO J S, CHEN G P, et al., 2021. Optimization of Regional Territory Space Pattern Based on MCR-FLUS-Markov Model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 52(4): 159-170, 207.
[41]	刘国华, 2016. 西南生态安全格局形成机制及演变机理[J]. 生态学报, 36(22): 7088-7091.
	LIU G H, 2016. Formation and evolution mechanism of ecological security pattern in Southwest China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(22): 7088-7091.
[42]	刘杰, 叶晶, 杨婉, 等, 2012. 基于GIS的滇池流域景观格局优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 27(5): 801-808.
	LIU J, YE J, YANG W, et al., 2012. A GIS-Based Landscape Pattern Optimization Approach for Lake Dianchi Watershed[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 27(5): 801-808.
[43]	刘焱序, 于丹丹, 傅伯杰, 等, 2020. 生物多样性与生态系统服务情景模拟研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 40(17): 5863-5873.
	LIU Y X, YU D D, FU B J, et al., 2020. Research progress on the biodiversity and ecosystem service scenario simulations[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(17): 5863-5873.
[44]	刘洋, 蒙吉军, 朱利凯, 2010. 区域生态安全格局研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 30(24): 6890-6898.
	LIU Y, MENG J J, ZHU L K, 2010. Progress in the research on regional ecological security pattern[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30(24): 6890-6898.
[45]	刘振明, 2003. 可持续发展伦理问题研究综述[J]. 道德与文明 (4): 72-76.
	LIU Z M, 2003. A summary of the research on the ethical issues of sustainable development[J]. Morality and Civilization (4): 72-76.
[46]	吕一河, 傅伯杰, 2001. 生态学中的尺度及尺度转换方法[J]. 生态学报, 21(12): 2096-2015.
	LÜ Y H, FU B J, 2001. Ecological scale and scaling[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 21(12): 2096-2015.
[47]	马克明, 傅伯杰, 黎晓亚, 等, 2004. 区域生态安全格局: 概念与理论基础[J]. 生态学报, 24(4): 761-768.
	MA K M, FU B J, LI X Y, et al., 2004. The regional pattern for ecological security (RPES): the concept and theoretical basis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24(4): 761-768.
[48]	马世发, 劳春华, 江海燕, 2021. 基于生态安全格局理论的国土空间生态修复分区模拟——以粤港澳大湾区为例[J]. 生态学报, 41(9): 3441-3448.
	MA S F, LAO C H, JIANG H Y, 2021. Ecological restoration zoning of territorial space based on the pattern simulation of eco-security scenario: A case study of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(9): 3441-3448.
[49]	蒙吉军, 王雅, 王晓东, 等, 2016. 基于最小累积阻力模型的贵阳市景观生态安全格局构建[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 25(7): 1052-1061.
	MENG J J, WANG Y, WANG X D, et al., 2016. Construction of landscape ecological security pattern in Guiyang based on MCR model[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 25(7): 1052-1061.
[50]	蒙吉军, 赵春红, 刘明达, 2011. 基于土地利用变化的区域生态安全评价——以鄂尔多斯市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 26(4): 578-590.
	MENG J J, ZHAO C H, LIU M D, 2011. Regional Ecological Security Assessment Based on Land Use Change: A Case Study in Ordos City[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 26(4): 578-590.
[51]	倪庆琳, 侯湖平, 丁忠义, 等, 2020. 基于生态安全格局识别的国土空间生态修复分区: 以徐州市贾汪区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 35(1): 204-216.
	NI Q L, HOU H P, DING Z Y, et al., 2020. Ecological remediation zoning of territory based on the ecological security pattern recognition: Taking Jiawang district of Xuzhou city as an example[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 35(1): 204-216. DOI URL
[52]	欧定华, 夏建国, 张莉, 等, 2015. 区域生态安全格局规划研究进展及规划技术流程探讨[J]. 生态环境学报, 24(1): 163-173.
	OU D H, XIA J G, ZHANG L, et al., 2015. Research progress on regional ecological security pattern planning and discussion of planning techniqueflow[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 24(1): 163-173.
[53]	彭建, 贾靖雷, 胡熠娜, 等, 2018. 基于地表湿润指数的农牧交错带地区生态安全格局构建——以内蒙古自治区杭锦旗为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 29(6): 1990-1998.
	PENG J, JIA J L, HU Y N, et al., 2018. Construction of ecological security pattern in the agro-pastoral ecotone based on surface humid index: A case study of Hangjin Banner, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29(6): 1990-1998.
[54]	彭建, 李慧蕾, 刘焱序, 等, 2018. 雄安新区生态安全格局识别与优化策略[J]. 地理学报, 73(4): 701-710. DOI
	PENG J, LI H L, LIU Y X, et al., 2018. Identification and optimization of ecological security pattern in Xiong’an New Area[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(4): 701-710. DOI
[55]	彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等, 2017. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望[J]. 地理研究, 36(3): 407-419. DOI
	PENG J, ZHAO H J, LIU Y X, et al., 2017. Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction[J]. Geographical Research, 36(3): 407-419.
[56]	彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等, 2016. 区域水安全格局构建:研究进展及概念框架[J]. 生态学报, 36(11): 3137-3145.
	PENG J, ZHAO H J, LIU Y X, et al., 2016. Progress and conceptual framework of regional water security pattern construction[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(11): 3137-3145.
[57]	苏泳娴, 陈修治, 叶玉瑶, 等, 2013. 基于夜间灯光数据的中国能源消费碳排放特征及机理[J]. 地理学报, 68(11): 1513-1526.
	SU Y X, CHEN X Z, YE Y Y, et al., 2013. The characteristics and mechanisms of carbon emissions from energy consumption in China using DMSP/OLS night light imageries[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 68(11): 1513-1526.
[58]	孙枫, 章锦河, 王培家, 等, 2021. 城市生态安全格局构建与评价研究:以苏州市区为例[J]. 地理研究, 40(9): 2476-2493. DOI
	SUN F, ZHANG J H, WANG P J, et al., 2021. Construction and evaluation of urban ecological security pattern: A case study of Suzhou city[J]. Geographical Research, 40(9): 2476-2493.
[59]	汤长安, 张丽家, 殷强, 2018. 中国战略性新兴产业空间格局演变与优化[J]. 经济地理, 38(5): 101-107.
	TANG C A, ZHANG L J, YIN Q, 2018. Evolution and Optimization of Spatial Layout of Strategic Emerging Industry in China[J]. Economic Geography, 38(5): 101-107.
[60]	王让虎, 李晓燕, 张树文, 等, 2014. 东北农牧交错带景观生态安全格局构建及预警研究——以吉林省通榆县为例[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 30(2): 111-115, 127.
	WANG R H, LI X Y, ZHANG S W, et al., 2014. Research for Landscape Ecological Security Pattern and Early Warning in Farming-Pastoral Zone of Northeast China: A Case Study of Tongyu County in Jilin Province[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 30(2): 111-115, 127.
[61]	吴健生, 钟晓红, 彭建, 等, 2015. 基于生态系统服务簇的小尺度区域生态用地功能分类——以重庆两江新区为例[J]. 生态学报, 35(11): 3808-3816.
	WU J S, ZHONG X H, PENG J, et al., 2015. Function classification of ecological land in a small area based on ecosystem service bundles: A case study in Liangjiang New Area, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(11): 3808-3816.
[62]	肖笃宁, 陈文波, 郭福良, 2002. 论生态安全的基本概念和研究内容[J]. 应用生态学报, 13(3): 354-358.
	XIAO D N, CHEN W B, GUO F L, 2002. On the basic concepts and contents of ecological security[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 13(3): 354-358.
[63]	徐文彬, 尹海伟, 孔繁花, 2017. 基于生态安全格局的南京都市区生态控制边界划定[J]. 生态学报, 37(12): 4019-4028.
	XU W B, YIN H W, KONG F H, 2017. Development of ecological control boundaries in Nanjing metropolis district based on ecological security patterns[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(12): 4019-4028.
[64]	杨凯, 曹银贵, 冯喆, 等, 2021. 基于最小累积阻力模型的生态安全格局构建研究进展[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 37(5): 555-565.
	YANG K, CAO Y G, FENG Z, et al., 2021. Research Progress of Ecological Security Pattern Construction Based on Minimum Cumulative Resistance Model[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 37(5): 555-565.
[65]	杨天荣, 匡文慧, 刘卫东, 等, 2017. 基于生态安全格局的关中城市群生态空间结构优化布局[J]. 地理研究, 36(3): 441-452. DOI
	YANG T R, KUANG W H, LIU W D, et al., 2017. Optimizing the layout of eco-spatial structure in Guanzhong urban agglomeration based on the ecological security pattern[J]. Geographical Research, 36(3): 441-452.
[66]	杨彦昆, 王勇, 程先, 等, 2020. 基于连通度指数的生态安全格局构建——以三峡库区重庆段为例[J]. 生态学报, 40(15): 5124-5136.
	YANG Y K, WANG Y, CHENG X, et al., 2020. Establishment of an ecological security pattern based on connectivity index: A case study of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area in Chongqing[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(15): 5124-5136.
[67]	叶鑫, 邹长新, 刘国华, 等, 2018. 生态安全格局研究的主要内容与进展[J]. 生态学报, 38(10): 3382-3392.
	YE X, ZOU C X, LIU G H, et al., 2018. Main research contents and advances in the ecological security pattern[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(10): 3382-3392.
[68]	尤飞, 王传胜, 2003. 生态经济学基础理论、研究方法和学科发展趋势探讨[J]. 中国软科学 (3): 131-138.
	YOU F, WANG C S, 2003. Theories and approaches of ecological economics and their evolutional trends[J]. China Soft Science (3): 131-138.
[69]	于贵瑞, 杨萌, 陈智, 等, 2021. 大尺度区域生态环境治理及国家生态安全格局构建的技术途径和战略布局[J]. 应用生态学报, 32(4): 1141-1153.
	YU G R, YANG M, CHEN Z, et al., 2021. Technical approach and strategic plan for large scale ecological and environmental governance and national ecological security pattern construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 32(4): 1141-1153.
[70]	于强, 岳德鹏, 张启斌, 等, 2017. 磴口县景观格局演变特征及生态网络构建[J]. 中国沙漠, 37(3): 601-609.
	YU Q, YUE D P, ZHANG Q B, et al., 2017. The Evolution of Landscape Pattern and the Construction of Ecological Infrastructure Network in Dengkou, Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 37(3): 601-609.
[71]	俞孔坚, 李迪华, 段铁武, 1998. 生物多样性保护的景观规划途径[J]. 生物多样性, 6(3): 45-52.
	YU K J, LI D H, DUAN T W, 1998. Landscape approaches in biodiversity conservation[J]. Biodiversity Science, 6(3): 45-52.
[72]	岳德鹏, 于强, 张启斌, 等, 2017. 区域生态安全格局优化研究进展[J]. 农业机械学报, 48(2): 1-10.
	YUE D P, YU Q, ZHANG Q B, et al., 2017. Progress in Tesearch on Regional Ecological Security Pattern Optimization[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 48(2): 1-10.
[73]	张虹波, 刘黎明, 2006. 土地资源生态安全研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 25(5): 77-85.
	ZHANG H B, LIU L M, 2006. Main Progress and Prospects of Land Resource Ecological Security Research[J]. Progress in Geography, 25(5):77-85.
[74]	张利, 张乐, 王观湧, 等, 2014. 基于景观安全格局的曹妃甸新区生态基础设施构建研究[J]. 土壤, 46(3): 555-561.
	ZHANG L, ZHANG L, WANG G Y, et al., 2014. Study on Construction of Ecological Infrastructure in Caofeidian New Area Based on Landscape Security Pattern[J]. Soils, 46(3): 555-561.
[75]	周道玮, 钟秀丽, 1996. 干扰生态理论的基本概念和扰动生态学理论框架[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版) (1): 90-96.
	ZHOU D W, ZHONG X L, 1996. The basic concepts of disturbance ecology theory and the theoretical framework of disturbance ecology[J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Natural Science Edition) (1): 90-96.
[76]	曾敏姿, 翟俊, 2021. 实现城市生物多样性保护与提升的综合性景观途径[J]. 中国园林, 37(7): 101-106.
	ZENG M Z, ZHAI J, 2021. Comprehensive Landscape Approaches to Realize Urban Biodiversity Conservation and Enhancement[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 37(7): 101-106.

理论名称 Theoretical name	理论内涵 Theoretical connotation	关注点 Focus point	主要应用 Main application
景观生态学 Landscape ecology	由不同生态系统所组成的整体（即景观）的空间结构（Forman et al., 1995）	景观格局与生态过程的相互作用	景观格局、生态系统结构与过程
恢复生态学 Restoration ecology	恢复已退化的生态系统,提高和改善生态服务功能与健康状况（Costanza et al., 1997）	保护原生生态系统、修复受损生态系统、管理现有生态系统	生态系统结构和功能恢复
干扰生态学 Disturbance ecology	基于自然干扰与人为干扰尺度维持生态系统结构、功能、过程的完整（周道玮等, 1996）	干扰的类型、原因、频率、强度、分布、阈值和范围等	干扰与格局的相互作用
保护生物学 Conservation biology	保护和维持大自然与生物多样性（李晓文等, 1999）	区域尺度保护和恢复生物多样性	维持生态系统结构和功能的完整性,提高生态可持续性
生态经济学 Ecological Economics	研究人类社会经济行为与其所引起的资源环境嬗变间的关系,平衡社会、生态与经济之间的效益（尤飞等, 2003）	经济发展与环境保护之间的相互关系,通过经济措施解决生态问题	自然资源保护性利用,生态系统服务功能的价值评估
生态伦理学 Ecological ethics	从伦理原则与行为道德来规范、约束人类社会经济活动,规避不利于自然生态的社会导向与行为（刘振明, 2003）	研究人对待自然的态度问题,规避不利于自然生态的社会导向与行为	生态安全格局的可持续性

理论名称 Theoretical name	理论内涵 Theoretical connotation	关注点 Focus point	主要应用 Main application
景观生态学 Landscape ecology	由不同生态系统所组成的整体（即景观）的空间结构（Forman et al., 1995）	景观格局与生态过程的相互作用	景观格局、生态系统结构与过程
恢复生态学 Restoration ecology	恢复已退化的生态系统,提高和改善生态服务功能与健康状况（Costanza et al., 1997）	保护原生生态系统、修复受损生态系统、管理现有生态系统	生态系统结构和功能恢复
干扰生态学 Disturbance ecology	基于自然干扰与人为干扰尺度维持生态系统结构、功能、过程的完整（周道玮等, 1996）	干扰的类型、原因、频率、强度、分布、阈值和范围等	干扰与格局的相互作用
保护生物学 Conservation biology	保护和维持大自然与生物多样性（李晓文等, 1999）	区域尺度保护和恢复生物多样性	维持生态系统结构和功能的完整性,提高生态可持续性
生态经济学 Ecological Economics	研究人类社会经济行为与其所引起的资源环境嬗变间的关系,平衡社会、生态与经济之间的效益（尤飞等, 2003）	经济发展与环境保护之间的相互关系,通过经济措施解决生态问题	自然资源保护性利用,生态系统服务功能的价值评估
生态伦理学 Ecological ethics	从伦理原则与行为道德来规范、约束人类社会经济活动,规避不利于自然生态的社会导向与行为（刘振明, 2003）	研究人对待自然的态度问题,规避不利于自然生态的社会导向与行为	生态安全格局的可持续性

模型 Model	优点 Advantage	缺点 Shortcoming
最小累积阻力模型 Minimal cumulative resistance model	数据需求少,最优生态廊道提取快捷, 兼容性良好且适用性较好	无法指示廊道宽度,生态过程机理研究不足, 欠缺考虑多路径扩散可能性
电路模型 Circuit model	有效表达物种多路径扩展可能性, 能有效识别生态节点和障碍点	生态过程的机理研究不足, 生态廊道宽度最大阈值难以界定
斑块重力模型 Plaque gravity model	模型易懂,数据收集简单, 成图质量高	无法识别廊道和指示廊道宽度, 生态过程机理研究不足
蚁群模型 Ant colony model	生态源地选址处理高效, 考虑物种多路径扩展可能性	无法识别廊道和指示廊道宽度, 关键阈值设定严格

模型 Model	优点 Advantage	缺点 Shortcoming
最小累积阻力模型 Minimal cumulative resistance model	数据需求少,最优生态廊道提取快捷, 兼容性良好且适用性较好	无法指示廊道宽度,生态过程机理研究不足, 欠缺考虑多路径扩散可能性
电路模型 Circuit model	有效表达物种多路径扩展可能性, 能有效识别生态节点和障碍点	生态过程的机理研究不足, 生态廊道宽度最大阈值难以界定
斑块重力模型 Plaque gravity model	模型易懂,数据收集简单, 成图质量高	无法识别廊道和指示廊道宽度, 生态过程机理研究不足
蚁群模型 Ant colony model	生态源地选址处理高效, 考虑物种多路径扩展可能性	无法识别廊道和指示廊道宽度, 关键阈值设定严格

Construction of Ecological Security Pattern: Concept, Framework and Prospect

生态安全格局构建：概念、框架与展望

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 76

Related Articles 6

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	XU Jing, LIAO Xingkai, GAN Qixu, ZHOU Maoxian. Construction of Ecological Security Pattern Based on MSPA and Circuit Theory in Gansu Section of the Yellow River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(4): 805-813.
[2]	ZHANG Pingjiang, DANG Guofeng. Construction of Ecological Security Pattern of Tao River Basin Based on MCR Model and ant Colony Algorithm [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(3): 481-491.
[3]	WEI Jiayi, LI Cheng, WU Zhifeng, ZHANG Li, JI Dongqing, CHENG Jiong. Identifying Ecological Security Patterns and Prioritizing Ecological Corridors in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(4): 652-662.
[4]	WEI Jianbing, ZHENG Hong, CHENG Yulu, WANG Yang. Advances in Research of Ecological Security Patterns, Based on CiteSpace [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(4): 835-844.
[5]	QI Jing, DENG Wei, ZHOU Yu, LIU Ting, LUO Xu. China's Ecological Conservation Redline: Evaluation Method and Application of Protection Effect in Chongqing [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(7): 1532-1540.
[6]	LEI Jinrui, CHEN Zongzhu, CHEN Yiqing, CHEN Xiaohua, LI Yuanling, WU Tingtian. Dynamic Analysis of Wetland Landscape Ecological Security Pattern of Hainan Island in 1990‒2018 [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2020, 29(2): 293-302.