Ecology and Environmental Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 1255-1264.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2025.08.010
• Research Article [Ecology] • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Mei1(), CONG Peidong1, DUAN Siyang2, ZHAO Xiuting2, LI Fuxiang1, LIU Li2,*(
), LI Haiyan3,4,*(
)
Received:
2025-02-11
Online:
2025-08-18
Published:
2025-08-01
张梅1(), 丛培东1, 段思阳2, 赵秀婷2, 李富祥1, 刘利2,*(
), 李海燕3,4,*(
)
通讯作者:
*E-mail: 作者简介:
张梅(1971年生),女,副教授,主要从事生态学研究。E-mail: ddzm0201@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHANG Mei, CONG Peidong, DUAN Siyang, ZHAO Xiuting, LI Fuxiang, LIU Li, LI Haiyan. Functional Trait Differentiation of Leaf, Stem and Inflorescence of Invasive Plant Sicyos angulatus in Different Habitats of Lower Yalu River[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2025, 34(8): 1255-1264.
张梅, 丛培东, 段思阳, 赵秀婷, 李富祥, 刘利, 李海燕. 鸭绿江下游入侵植物刺果瓜叶茎花序功能性状的生境分异[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(8): 1255-1264.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2025.08.010
生境 | 环境特征 | 分布 | 群落盖度/% | 伴生种 |
---|---|---|---|---|
林缘 | 相对光强40%,温度25 ℃,土壤含水率70% | 斑块群落 | >80 | 杨树(Populus L.),柳树(Ligustrum btusifolium) |
河边 | 相对光强85%,温度29 ℃,土壤含水率70% | 斑块群落 | <60 | 葎草(Humulus scandens),早熟禾(Poa annua) |
菜地边 | 相对光强80%,温度30 ℃,土壤含水率70% | 斑块群落 | >80 | 凹头苋(Amaranthus lividus),粗毛牛膝菊(Galinsoga quadriradiata) |
水沟边 | 相对光强80%,温度30 ℃,土壤含水率75% | 优势群落 | >80 | 葎草(H. scandens)、红蓼(P. orientalis) |
路边荒地 | 相对光强90%,温度31 ℃,土壤含水率60% | 斑块群落 | <60 | 水蜡树(Ligustrum obtusifolium),葎草(H. scandens) |
废弃铁路 | 相对光强95%,温度34 ℃,土壤含水率50% | 优势群落 | >70 | 葎草(H. scandens),鸭跖草(C. communis) |
Table 1 Basic information of S. angulatus population plots
生境 | 环境特征 | 分布 | 群落盖度/% | 伴生种 |
---|---|---|---|---|
林缘 | 相对光强40%,温度25 ℃,土壤含水率70% | 斑块群落 | >80 | 杨树(Populus L.),柳树(Ligustrum btusifolium) |
河边 | 相对光强85%,温度29 ℃,土壤含水率70% | 斑块群落 | <60 | 葎草(Humulus scandens),早熟禾(Poa annua) |
菜地边 | 相对光强80%,温度30 ℃,土壤含水率70% | 斑块群落 | >80 | 凹头苋(Amaranthus lividus),粗毛牛膝菊(Galinsoga quadriradiata) |
水沟边 | 相对光强80%,温度30 ℃,土壤含水率75% | 优势群落 | >80 | 葎草(H. scandens)、红蓼(P. orientalis) |
路边荒地 | 相对光强90%,温度31 ℃,土壤含水率60% | 斑块群落 | <60 | 水蜡树(Ligustrum obtusifolium),葎草(H. scandens) |
废弃铁路 | 相对光强95%,温度34 ℃,土壤含水率50% | 优势群落 | >70 | 葎草(H. scandens),鸭跖草(C. communis) |
性状 | 林缘 | 河边 | 菜地 | 水沟 | 荒地 | 废铁路 | 平均 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶长宽比 | 5.44 | 9.30 | 8.77 | 6.64 | 5.40 | 8.56 | 7.35 |
叶面积 | 18.05 | 23.70 | 25.77 | 42.86 | 33.51 | 44.59 | 31.41 |
比叶面积 | 14.35 | 14.46 | 27.84 | 12.98 | 19.42 | 14.81 | 17.31 |
叶厚 | 18.39 | 23.06 | 54.76 | 12.17 | 15.55 | 17.48 | 23.57 |
叶柄长 | 29.69 | 39.45 | 37.17 | 27.58 | 29.51 | 48.73 | 35.35 |
叶柄粗 | 11.25 | 12.80 | 16.13 | 15.72 | 16.95 | 23.91 | 16.13 |
叶绿素含量 | 3.85 | 4.67 | 2.67 | 5.30 | 2.71 | 5.73 | 4.15 |
叶氮素含量 | 3.18 | 3.70 | 2.23 | 4.42 | 2.24 | 4.62 | 3.40 |
叶生物量 | 22.62 | 27.28 | 35.52 | 42.56 | 45.44 | 46.46 | 36.65 |
平均 | 14.09 | 17.60 | 23.43 | 18.91 | 18.97 | 23.88 | 19.48 |
茎节长 | 13.66 | 11.86 | 15.21 | 11.52 | 11.26 | 13.94 | 12.91 |
茎粗 | 14.46 | 16.51 | 13.39 | 17.48 | 14.62 | 19.50 | 15.99 |
卷须分枝数 | 8.99 | 10.96 | 15.33 | 19.02 | 13.29 | 10.00 | 12.93 |
卷须长 | 23.94 | 25.22 | 30.11 | 20.92 | 31.28 | 27.23 | 26.45 |
卷须生物量 | 29.11 | 28.48 | 37.56 | 30.04 | 26.22 | 31.13 | 30.42 |
茎节生物量 | 35.64 | 23.41 | 30.84 | 27.46 | 27.50 | 29.62 | 29.08 |
平均 | 20.97 | 19.41 | 23.74 | 21.07 | 20.69 | 21.90 | 21.30 |
雌花序轴长 | 16.68 | 15.60 | 26.71 | 25.28 | 29.96 | 17.04 | 21.88 |
雄花序轴长 | 18.16 | 22.80 | 24.10 | 33.80 | 24.20 | 22.13 | 24.20 |
雌花数量 | 28.05 | 28.01 | 17.08 | 25.92 | 25.50 | 38.23 | 27.13 |
雄花数量 | 22.40 | 24.48 | 38.41 | 32.01 | 18.58 | 23.21 | 26.51 |
雌花生物量 | 43.38 | 32.05 | 22.84 | 42.71 | 55.51 | 52.65 | 41.52 |
雄花生物量 | 35.64 | 55.79 | 35.41 | 44.70 | 36.72 | 33.32 | 40.26 |
平均 | 27.38 | 29.79 | 27.42 | 34.07 | 31.74 | 31.10 | 30.25 |
Table 2 Variation of leaf, stem and infructescence functional traits of S. angulatus among different habitats %
性状 | 林缘 | 河边 | 菜地 | 水沟 | 荒地 | 废铁路 | 平均 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶长宽比 | 5.44 | 9.30 | 8.77 | 6.64 | 5.40 | 8.56 | 7.35 |
叶面积 | 18.05 | 23.70 | 25.77 | 42.86 | 33.51 | 44.59 | 31.41 |
比叶面积 | 14.35 | 14.46 | 27.84 | 12.98 | 19.42 | 14.81 | 17.31 |
叶厚 | 18.39 | 23.06 | 54.76 | 12.17 | 15.55 | 17.48 | 23.57 |
叶柄长 | 29.69 | 39.45 | 37.17 | 27.58 | 29.51 | 48.73 | 35.35 |
叶柄粗 | 11.25 | 12.80 | 16.13 | 15.72 | 16.95 | 23.91 | 16.13 |
叶绿素含量 | 3.85 | 4.67 | 2.67 | 5.30 | 2.71 | 5.73 | 4.15 |
叶氮素含量 | 3.18 | 3.70 | 2.23 | 4.42 | 2.24 | 4.62 | 3.40 |
叶生物量 | 22.62 | 27.28 | 35.52 | 42.56 | 45.44 | 46.46 | 36.65 |
平均 | 14.09 | 17.60 | 23.43 | 18.91 | 18.97 | 23.88 | 19.48 |
茎节长 | 13.66 | 11.86 | 15.21 | 11.52 | 11.26 | 13.94 | 12.91 |
茎粗 | 14.46 | 16.51 | 13.39 | 17.48 | 14.62 | 19.50 | 15.99 |
卷须分枝数 | 8.99 | 10.96 | 15.33 | 19.02 | 13.29 | 10.00 | 12.93 |
卷须长 | 23.94 | 25.22 | 30.11 | 20.92 | 31.28 | 27.23 | 26.45 |
卷须生物量 | 29.11 | 28.48 | 37.56 | 30.04 | 26.22 | 31.13 | 30.42 |
茎节生物量 | 35.64 | 23.41 | 30.84 | 27.46 | 27.50 | 29.62 | 29.08 |
平均 | 20.97 | 19.41 | 23.74 | 21.07 | 20.69 | 21.90 | 21.30 |
雌花序轴长 | 16.68 | 15.60 | 26.71 | 25.28 | 29.96 | 17.04 | 21.88 |
雄花序轴长 | 18.16 | 22.80 | 24.10 | 33.80 | 24.20 | 22.13 | 24.20 |
雌花数量 | 28.05 | 28.01 | 17.08 | 25.92 | 25.50 | 38.23 | 27.13 |
雄花数量 | 22.40 | 24.48 | 38.41 | 32.01 | 18.58 | 23.21 | 26.51 |
雌花生物量 | 43.38 | 32.05 | 22.84 | 42.71 | 55.51 | 52.65 | 41.52 |
雄花生物量 | 35.64 | 55.79 | 35.41 | 44.70 | 36.72 | 33.32 | 40.26 |
平均 | 27.38 | 29.79 | 27.42 | 34.07 | 31.74 | 31.10 | 30.25 |
性状 | 主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 | 主成分4 | 主成分5 | 主成分6 | 主成分7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶长宽比 | −0.603 | 0.122 | 0.095 | 0.151 | −0.098 | 0.240 | 0.473 |
叶面积 | 0.702 | −0.437 | −0.134 | 0.214 | −0.011 | 0.375 | 0.121 |
比叶面积 | 0.161 | −0.774 | −0.396 | −0.100 | −0.072 | 0.280 | 0.116 |
叶厚 | 0.040 | 0.774 | −0.012 | −0.018 | −0.143 | 0.008 | 0.016 |
叶柄长 | 0.835 | 0.024 | 0.248 | 0.043 | −0.021 | −0.115 | −0.023 |
叶柄基径 | 0.838 | −0.056 | 0.184 | 0.081 | 0.050 | 0.306 | 0.122 |
叶绿素含量 | 0.253 | 0.207 | 0.899 | 0.062 | 0.123 | 0.053 | −0.054 |
叶氮素含量 | 0.243 | 0.207 | 0.905 | 0.054 | 0.116 | 0.055 | −0.049 |
叶生物量 | 0.677 | 0.294 | 0.213 | 0.362 | 0.054 | 0.182 | −0.102 |
茎节间长 | 0.076 | −0.120 | −0.001 | 0.114 | −0.003 | 0.901 | 0.018 |
茎粗 | 0.240 | 0.377 | 0.023 | −0.071 | 0.391 | 0.550 | −0.094 |
卷须分枝数 | 0.089 | 0.094 | 0.512 | −0.098 | 0.376 | 0.136 | 0.159 |
卷须长 | −0.090 | −0.366 | 0.045 | 0.126 | 0.725 | −0.145 | 0.039 |
卷须生物量 | 0.088 | 0.181 | 0.063 | 0.115 | 0.760 | 0.140 | 0.033 |
茎节生物量 | −0.091 | 0.699 | 0.332 | 0.248 | 0.335 | 0.245 | −0.079 |
雄花序轴长 | 0.430 | 0.110 | −0.014 | 0.751 | 0.102 | 0.097 | 0.238 |
雌花序轴长 | 0.401 | −0.398 | −0.124 | −0.036 | −0.158 | 0.214 | 0.635 |
雄花数量 | −0.043 | −0.102 | 0.077 | 0.791 | −0.006 | 0.039 | 0.076 |
雌花数量 | −0.007 | 0.277 | −0.208 | −0.279 | 0.301 | 0.122 | 0.478 |
雌花生物量 | −0.101 | −0.120 | −0.084 | 0.224 | 0.090 | −0.199 | 0.819 |
雄花生物量 | 0.165 | 0.383 | 0.129 | 0.670 | 0.283 | 0.010 | −0.169 |
方差贡献率/% | 23.04 | 17.77 | 10.41 | 8.27 | 6.39 | 5.71 | 5.41 |
累计方差贡献率/% | 23.04 | 40.81 | 51.22 | 59.49 | 65.88 | 71.59 | 77.07 |
Table 3 PCA of leaf, stem and infructescence functional traits of S. angulatus
性状 | 主成分1 | 主成分2 | 主成分3 | 主成分4 | 主成分5 | 主成分6 | 主成分7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶长宽比 | −0.603 | 0.122 | 0.095 | 0.151 | −0.098 | 0.240 | 0.473 |
叶面积 | 0.702 | −0.437 | −0.134 | 0.214 | −0.011 | 0.375 | 0.121 |
比叶面积 | 0.161 | −0.774 | −0.396 | −0.100 | −0.072 | 0.280 | 0.116 |
叶厚 | 0.040 | 0.774 | −0.012 | −0.018 | −0.143 | 0.008 | 0.016 |
叶柄长 | 0.835 | 0.024 | 0.248 | 0.043 | −0.021 | −0.115 | −0.023 |
叶柄基径 | 0.838 | −0.056 | 0.184 | 0.081 | 0.050 | 0.306 | 0.122 |
叶绿素含量 | 0.253 | 0.207 | 0.899 | 0.062 | 0.123 | 0.053 | −0.054 |
叶氮素含量 | 0.243 | 0.207 | 0.905 | 0.054 | 0.116 | 0.055 | −0.049 |
叶生物量 | 0.677 | 0.294 | 0.213 | 0.362 | 0.054 | 0.182 | −0.102 |
茎节间长 | 0.076 | −0.120 | −0.001 | 0.114 | −0.003 | 0.901 | 0.018 |
茎粗 | 0.240 | 0.377 | 0.023 | −0.071 | 0.391 | 0.550 | −0.094 |
卷须分枝数 | 0.089 | 0.094 | 0.512 | −0.098 | 0.376 | 0.136 | 0.159 |
卷须长 | −0.090 | −0.366 | 0.045 | 0.126 | 0.725 | −0.145 | 0.039 |
卷须生物量 | 0.088 | 0.181 | 0.063 | 0.115 | 0.760 | 0.140 | 0.033 |
茎节生物量 | −0.091 | 0.699 | 0.332 | 0.248 | 0.335 | 0.245 | −0.079 |
雄花序轴长 | 0.430 | 0.110 | −0.014 | 0.751 | 0.102 | 0.097 | 0.238 |
雌花序轴长 | 0.401 | −0.398 | −0.124 | −0.036 | −0.158 | 0.214 | 0.635 |
雄花数量 | −0.043 | −0.102 | 0.077 | 0.791 | −0.006 | 0.039 | 0.076 |
雌花数量 | −0.007 | 0.277 | −0.208 | −0.279 | 0.301 | 0.122 | 0.478 |
雌花生物量 | −0.101 | −0.120 | −0.084 | 0.224 | 0.090 | −0.199 | 0.819 |
雄花生物量 | 0.165 | 0.383 | 0.129 | 0.670 | 0.283 | 0.010 | −0.169 |
方差贡献率/% | 23.04 | 17.77 | 10.41 | 8.27 | 6.39 | 5.71 | 5.41 |
累计方差贡献率/% | 23.04 | 40.81 | 51.22 | 59.49 | 65.88 | 71.59 | 77.07 |
[1] | BAI H, JI Y Z, WANG X Q, et al., 2024. Behavioral and economic traits reflect distinct resource acquisition strategies in tendril vines and stem twining vines[J]. Ecology and Evolution, 14(9): e70271. |
[2] | BLAISE B, MÜLLER C, 2022. Differences in functional traits among distinct populations of the plant invader Bunias orientalis[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 15(3): 524-537. |
[3] | CHEN X X, YANG F H, QU B, et al., 2024. Evaluation of the indoor efficacy of various foliar-applied herbicides on Sicyos angulatus Seedlings[J]. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 46(5): 888-897. |
[4] | FU R Y, ZHANG Z H, HU C, et al., 2020. Bibliometric analysis of research trends and focuses of plant functional traits[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 615: 012102. |
[5] | JIA P, BAYAERTA T, LI X Q, et al., 2018. Relationships between flowering phenology and functional traits in Eastern Tibet alpine meadow[J]. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 43(4): 585-592. |
[6] | LI Y, MO Y X, CUI H L, et al., 2024. Intraspecific plasticity and co-variation of leaf traits facilitate Ficus tinctoria to acclimate hemiepiphytic and terrestrial habitats[J]. Tree Physiology, 44(2): tpae007. |
[7] | LIU Y J, WU H R, WANG C Y, et al., 2022. A comparative study reveals the key biological traits causing bioinvasion differences among four alien species of genus veronica in China[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2(2): 1-16. |
[8] | MASON C M, DONOVAN L A, 2015. Evolution of the leaf economics spectrum in herbs: Evidence from environmental divergences in leaf physiology across Helianthus (Asteraceae)[J]. Evolution, 69(10): 2705-2720. |
[9] |
MIDOLO G, DEFRENNE P, HÖLZEL N, et al., 2019. Global patterns of intraspecific leaf trait responses to elevation[J]. Global Change Biology, 25(7): 2485-2498.
DOI PMID |
[10] | NICULESCU M, IANCU P, PĂNIȚĂ O F, 2024. Invasion of Sicyos angulatus in Riparian Habitats in the Jiu and Danube Area (Romania)[J]. Diversity, 16(7): 400. |
[11] | SUN J, FAN R R, NIKLAS K J, et al., 2017. “Diminishing returns” in the scaling of leaf area vs. dry mass in Wuyi Mountain bamboos, Southeast China[J]. American Journal of Botany, 104(7): 993-998. |
[12] | SONG Y P, YU Y H, LI Y T, 2022. Leaf functional traits and relationships with soil properties of Zanthoxylum planispinum ‘dintanensis’ in plantations of different ages[J]. Agronomy, 12(8): 1891. |
[13] | WANG C Y, WU B D, JIANG K, et al., 2019. Canada goldenrod invasion cause significant shifts in the taxonomic diversity and community stability of plant communities in heterogeneous landscapes in urban ecosystems in east China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 127: 504-509. |
[14] | 曹日格, 奇立敏, 2024. 不同刈割高度对人工草地植物功能性状的影响[J]. 内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版), 55(6): 641-651. |
CAO R G, QI L M, 2024. Effects of different mowing heights on plant functional traits in artificial grassland[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia University (Natural Science Edition), 55(6): 641-651. | |
[15] |
陈雪纯, 刘虹, 朱少琦, 等, 2023. 漓江流域不同弃耕年限下4种常见草本植物功能性状种内变化及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 47(4): 559-570.
DOI |
CHEN X C, LIU H, ZHU S Q, et al., 2023. Intraspecific variations in plant functional traits of four common herbaceous species under different abandoned years and their relevant driving factors in Lijiang River Basin, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 47(4): 559-570. | |
[16] |
龚莉, 翟伟, 吕丹, 等, 2022. 不同生境入侵植物北美车前繁殖器官性状变异与权衡特征[J]. 植物研究, 42(4): 544-555.
DOI |
GONG L, ZHAI W, LÜ D, et al., 2022. Variations and trade-offs in reproductive organ traits of an invasive plant Plantago virginica in different habitats[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 42(4): 544-555.
DOI |
|
[17] | 何莉莉, 刘金昌, 陈柏, 2022. 外来入侵植物刺果瓜在辽宁省的潜在分布及农业经济损失预测[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 53(1): 119-127. |
HE L L, LIU J C, CHEN B, 2022. Potential distribution and agricultural economic loss prediction of alien invasive plant Sicyos angulatus in Liaoning province[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 53(1): 119-127. | |
[18] |
侯清晨, 冯燕楼, 周玉洁, 等, 2022. 植物入侵机制的主要假说[J]. 应用生态学报, 33(11): 3105-3115.
DOI |
HOU Q C, FENG Y L, ZHOU Y J, et al., 2022. The main hypotheses of plant invasion mechanisms[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(11): 3105-3115. | |
[19] | 姜宁, 2024. 不同茎叶除草剂对刺果瓜防除效果的研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学. |
JIANG N, 2024. A study on the control effectiveness of different stem and leaf herbicides on Sicyos angulatus[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University. | |
[20] | 罗娅婷, 王泽明, 崔现亮, 等, 2019. 白花鬼针草的繁殖特性及入侵性[J]. 生态学杂志, 38(3): 655-662. |
LUO Y T, WANG Z M, CUI X L, et al., 2019. The reproductive traits and invasiveness of Bidens pilosa var. radiata[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 38(3): 655-662. | |
[21] | 李轩, 卢海博, 黄智鸿, 2016. 刺果瓜甲醇提取物对植物化感作用的研究[J]. 杂草学报, 34(4): 23-27. |
LI X, LU H B, HUANG Z H, 2016. Allelopathy of a Sicyos angulatus methanol extract to plants[J]. Journal of Weed Science, 34(4): 23-27. | |
[22] |
范宏坤, 曾涛, 金光泽, 等, 2024. 小兴安岭不同生长型阔叶植物叶性状变异及权衡[J]. 植物生态学报, 48(3): 364-376.
DOI |
FAN H K, ZENG T, JIN G Z, et al., 2024. Leaf trait variation and trade-offs among growth types of broadleaf plants in Xiao Hinggan Mountains[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 48(3): 364-376. | |
[23] | 徐高峰, 申时才, 张付斗, 2014. 异质环境下入侵植物薇甘菊的适应性与繁殖特性[J]. 生态环境学报, 23(8): 1258-1264. |
XU G F, SHEN S C, ZHANG F D, 2014. Adaptability and reproductive characteristics of Mikania micrantha H.B.K under different habitats[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 23(8): 1258-1264. | |
[24] | 彭正东, 甘玉婷, 甘婉怡, 等, 2024. 白花鬼针草在入侵过程中的叶功能性状变化特点及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 生态学报, 44(21): 9862-9873. |
PENG Z D, GAN Y T, GAN W Y, et al., 2024. Changes of leaf functional traits and their relationship with environmental factors during the invasion of Bidens alba[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44(21): 9862-9873. | |
[25] | 隆庆之, 杜虎, 苏樑, 等, 2023. 喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶林木本植物功能性状变异及其适应策略[J]. 生态学报, 43(21): 8875-8883. |
LONG Q Z, DU H, SU L, et al., 2023. Variatiation of plant functional traits and adaptive strategies in Karst evergreen deciduous broad- leaved fouest[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(21): 8875-8883. | |
[26] | 焦德志, 钟露朋, 杨建霄, 等, 2023. 扎龙湿地不同生境芦苇功能性状变异及其对土壤因子的响应[J]. 生态学报, 43(22): 9305-9313. |
JIAO D Z, ZHONG L P, YANG J X, et al., 2023. Variation in functional traits of Phragmites australis in different habitats and their responses to soil factors in Zhalong wetland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(22): 9305-9313. | |
[27] | 焦德志, 钟露朋, 张艳馥, 等, 2022. 扎龙湿地不同生境芦苇分株的形态特征及生物量分配的异速关系[J]. 生态学报, 42(15): 6103-6110. |
JIAO D Z, ZHONG L P, ZHANG Y F, et al., 2022. Morphological traits and allometric relationships of biomass allocation of Phragmites australis ramets in different habitats in Zhalong wetland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(15): 6103-6110. | |
[28] | 吴明江, 邱娟, 凌孝波, 等, 2025. 新疆野果林黑果小檗叶片与果实功能性状特征[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学), 53(5): 1-13. |
WU M J, QIU J, LING X B, et al., 2025. Functional traits of the leaves and fruits of the dominant shrub Berberis atrocarpa in Xinjiang wild fruit forest[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Sciences), 53(5): 1-13. | |
[29] |
司贺龙, 刘玉卫, 张金林, 等, 2019. 生长素和赤霉素对刺果瓜幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 35(27): 65-71.
DOI |
SI H L, LIU Y W, ZHANG J L, et al., 2019. Effects of Auxin and Gibberellin on growth and development of Sicyos angulatus seedling[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 35(27): 65-71. | |
[30] |
王思琦, 金光泽, 2024. 五角槭不同生活史阶段叶枝根性状的变异与权衡[J]. 植物生态学报, 48(11): 1510-1523.
DOI |
WANG S Q, JIN G Z, 2024. Variation and trade-offs in leaf, branch, and root traits at different life history stages of Acer pictum subsp. Mono[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 48(11): 1510-1523. | |
[31] | 解书文, 金光泽, 刘志理, 2023. 小兴安岭不同耐荫性树种枝叶性状变异及权衡[J]. 生态学报, 43(22): 9314-9327. |
XIE S W, JIN G Z, LIU Z L, 2023. Variation and Trade-offs of twig and Leaf Traits of Different Shade Tolerance Species in the Xiaoxing’an Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(22): 9314-9327. | |
[32] | 徐艳玲, 秦誉嘉, 张源, 等, 2022. 基于maxent模型预测外来入侵植物刺果瓜在中国的潜在地理分布[J]. 植物保护学报, 49(5): 1440-1449. |
XU Y L, QIN Y J, ZHANG Y, et al., 2022. Potential geographical distribution of alien invasive bur cucumber Sicyos angulatus in China based on MaxEnt model[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 49(5): 1440-1449. | |
[33] | 严飞, 林毅, 张悦琳, 等, 2023. 外来入侵杂草刺果瓜的危险性风险分析[J]. 生物灾害科学, 46(2): 127-131. |
YAN F, LIN Y, ZHANG Y L, et al., 2023. Risk analysis of an invasive alien weed Sicyos angulatus[J]. Biological Disaster Science, 46(2): 127-131. | |
[34] |
张林, 罗天祥, 2004. 植物叶寿命及其相关叶性状的生态学研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 28(6): 844-852.
DOI |
ZHANG M, LUO T X, 2004. Advances in ecological studies on leaf lifespanand and associated leaf Traits[J]. Jorrnal of Plant Ecology, 28(6): 844-852. | |
[35] | 张梅, 丛培东, 刘宇嘉, 等, 2025. 外来植物刺果瓜的入侵策略与防治研究进展[J]. 生物安全学报, 34(1): 27-33. |
ZHANG M, CONG P D, LIU Y J, et al., 2025. Research progress on the invasion strategies and control measures of Sicyos angulatus[J]. Journal of Biosafety, 34(1): 27-33. |
[1] | WANG Junwei, CHEN Yonghao, ZENG Zhefei, CHEN Mengyan, LA Qiong. Study on Species Diversity of Invasive Plant Datura stramonium Community in Lhasa, Tibet [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(6): 900-907. |
[2] | LI Jiajing, LIANG Yongliang, LI Jingyao, LI Xiaowei, YANG Junlong. Analysis of Plant Ecological Strategies Based on Leaf Functional Traits on the Western Slope of Helan Mountain [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2024, 33(1): 45-53. |
[3] | DU Jiaoyan, CAI Guojun, ZHANG Hongyu, LI Anding. Response of Plant Leaf C, N, P Stoichiometry Characteristics to Climatic Environment and Soil Nutrients in Karst Areas of Guizhou [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2023, 32(12): 2154-2165. |
[4] | XIAO Yihua, FU Zhigao, XU Han, SHI Xin, TANG Haiming, CHEN Bufeng. Effects of Urbanization on Leaf Functional Traits of Different Functional Groups in Pearl River Delta [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2022, 31(9): 1783-1793. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn