Ecology and Environment ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 655-664.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2024.04.016
• Research Article [Environmental Sciences] • Previous Articles
Received:
2023-09-10
Online:
2024-04-18
Published:
2024-05-31
Contact:
HE Hao
通讯作者:
何浩
作者简介:
杨非凡(1999年生),女,硕士研究生,主要从事生态环境遥感研究。E-mail: 404628217@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
YANG Feifan, HE Hao. Ecological Environment Assessment and Ecological Zoning Construction in the Ili River Valley Based on EVI-ESV[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(4): 655-664.
杨非凡, 何浩. 基于“EVI-ESV”伊犁河谷生态环境评估及生态分区构建[J]. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(4): 655-664.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.jeesci.com/EN/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2024.04.016
权重 | 年份 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | 2015 | 2017 | 2019 | 2021 | |
W1 | 0.31 | 0.316 | 0.332 | 0.315 | 0.295 |
W2 | 0.206 | 0.206 | 0.188 | 0.202 | 0.216 |
W3 | 0.141 | 0.142 | 0.131 | 0.135 | 0.132 |
W4 | 0.085 | 0.087 | 0.088 | 0.108 | 0.103 |
W5 | 0.08 | 0.082 | 0.079 | 0.081 | 0.078 |
W6 | 0.071 | 0.072 | 0.068 | 0.068 | 0.067 |
累计贡献率 | 0.892 | 0.904 | 0.886 | 0.908 | 0.89 |
Table 1 Contribution rate of principal components of ecological fragility
权重 | 年份 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | 2015 | 2017 | 2019 | 2021 | |
W1 | 0.31 | 0.316 | 0.332 | 0.315 | 0.295 |
W2 | 0.206 | 0.206 | 0.188 | 0.202 | 0.216 |
W3 | 0.141 | 0.142 | 0.131 | 0.135 | 0.132 |
W4 | 0.085 | 0.087 | 0.088 | 0.108 | 0.103 |
W5 | 0.08 | 0.082 | 0.079 | 0.081 | 0.078 |
W6 | 0.071 | 0.072 | 0.068 | 0.068 | 0.067 |
累计贡献率 | 0.892 | 0.904 | 0.886 | 0.908 | 0.89 |
一级类型 | 二级类型 | 耕地 | 林地 | 草地 | 未利用地 | 水域 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
供给服务 | 食物生产 | 0.466 | 0.213 | 0.148 | 0.002 | 0.276 |
原料生产 | 0.103 | 0.49 | 0.217 | 0.006 | 0.154 | |
水资源供给 | -0.551 | 0.253 | 0.12 | 0.004 | 2.75 | |
调节服务 | 气体调节 | 0.376 | 1.61 | 0.764 | 0.027 | 0.802 |
气候调节 | 0.196 | 4.82 | 2.02 | 0.021 | 1.36 | |
净化环境 | 0.057 | 1.41 | 0.667 | 0.087 | 3.44 | |
水文调节 | 0.631 | 3.15 | 1.48 | 0.051 | 28.2 | |
支持服务 | 土壤保持 | 0.219 | 1.96 | 0.931 | 0.032 | 0.684 |
维持养分 | 0.065 | 0.15 | 0.072 | 0.002 | 0.053 | |
生物多样 | 0.072 | 1.79 | 0.846 | 0.03 | 2.2 | |
文化服务 | 美学景观 | 0.032 | 0.783 | 0.373 | 0.013 | 1.42 |
Table 2 Value equivalent of ecological services per unit area of Ili River Valley 104 yuan·hm-2
一级类型 | 二级类型 | 耕地 | 林地 | 草地 | 未利用地 | 水域 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
供给服务 | 食物生产 | 0.466 | 0.213 | 0.148 | 0.002 | 0.276 |
原料生产 | 0.103 | 0.49 | 0.217 | 0.006 | 0.154 | |
水资源供给 | -0.551 | 0.253 | 0.12 | 0.004 | 2.75 | |
调节服务 | 气体调节 | 0.376 | 1.61 | 0.764 | 0.027 | 0.802 |
气候调节 | 0.196 | 4.82 | 2.02 | 0.021 | 1.36 | |
净化环境 | 0.057 | 1.41 | 0.667 | 0.087 | 3.44 | |
水文调节 | 0.631 | 3.15 | 1.48 | 0.051 | 28.2 | |
支持服务 | 土壤保持 | 0.219 | 1.96 | 0.931 | 0.032 | 0.684 |
维持养分 | 0.065 | 0.15 | 0.072 | 0.002 | 0.053 | |
生物多样 | 0.072 | 1.79 | 0.846 | 0.03 | 2.2 | |
文化服务 | 美学景观 | 0.032 | 0.783 | 0.373 | 0.013 | 1.42 |
土地利用类型 | 年份 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | 2015 | 2017 | 2019 | 2021 | ||||||||||
供给值 | 比例/% | 供给值 | 比例/% | 供给值 | 比例/% | 供给值 | 比例/% | 供给值 | 比例/% | |||||
耕地 | 0.091 | 2.7 | 0.078 | 2.73 | 0.095 | 2.68 | 0.084 | 2.81 | 0.143 | 2.81 | ||||
林地 | 0.711 | 21.0 | 0.587 | 20.7 | 0.726 | 20.6 | 0.651 | 21.7 | 1.1 | 21.5 | ||||
草地 | 1.75 | 51.8 | 1.42 | 50.2 | 1.77 | 50.1 | 1.58 | 52.7 | 2.64 | 51.8 | ||||
未利用地 | 0.004 | 0.11 | 0.003 | 0.094 | 0.003 | 0.088 | 0.004 | 0.139 | 0.007 | 0.132 | ||||
水体 | 0.823 | 24.3 | 0.748 | 26.4 | 0.934 | 26.5 | 0.679 | 22.7 | 1.21 | 23.8 | ||||
建设用地 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
总计 | 3.38 | 100 | 2.84 | 100 | 3.53 | 100 | 2.99 | 100 | 5.1 | 100 |
Table 3 Supply value and proportion of ecosystem services of different land use types 1011 yuan
土地利用类型 | 年份 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | 2015 | 2017 | 2019 | 2021 | ||||||||||
供给值 | 比例/% | 供给值 | 比例/% | 供给值 | 比例/% | 供给值 | 比例/% | 供给值 | 比例/% | |||||
耕地 | 0.091 | 2.7 | 0.078 | 2.73 | 0.095 | 2.68 | 0.084 | 2.81 | 0.143 | 2.81 | ||||
林地 | 0.711 | 21.0 | 0.587 | 20.7 | 0.726 | 20.6 | 0.651 | 21.7 | 1.1 | 21.5 | ||||
草地 | 1.75 | 51.8 | 1.42 | 50.2 | 1.77 | 50.1 | 1.58 | 52.7 | 2.64 | 51.8 | ||||
未利用地 | 0.004 | 0.11 | 0.003 | 0.094 | 0.003 | 0.088 | 0.004 | 0.139 | 0.007 | 0.132 | ||||
水体 | 0.823 | 24.3 | 0.748 | 26.4 | 0.934 | 26.5 | 0.679 | 22.7 | 1.21 | 23.8 | ||||
建设用地 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
总计 | 3.38 | 100 | 2.84 | 100 | 3.53 | 100 | 2.99 | 100 | 5.1 | 100 |
自变量 | 高脆弱-高供给区 (Ⅰ) | 低脆弱-低供给区 (Ⅲ) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVI | ESV | EVI | ESV | ||||||||
r | p | r | p | r | p | r | p | ||||
植被覆盖度 | -0.529** | 0 | 0.387** | 0 | -0.369** | 0 | 0.229** | 0 | |||
土地利用类型 | -0.128* | 0.012 | 0.107** | 0 | -0.498** | 0 | 0.401** | 0 | |||
人均生产总值 | 0.287** | 0 | -0.393** | 0 | 0.161** | 0 | -0.202** | 0 | |||
土壤湿度 | -0.133** | 0.009 | 0.15** | 0 | -0.251** | 0 | 0.194** | 0 | |||
牧羊单位密度 | 0.167** | 0 | -0.152** | 0 | 0.188** | 0 | -0.089* | 0.038 | |||
热度 | 0.273** | 0 | -0.038* | 0.039 | 0.043 | 0.167 | -0.078 | 0.06 | |||
坡度 | 0.098* | 0.029 | -0.049* | 0.021 | 0.083* | 0.049 | -0.061 | 0.131 | |||
坡向 | 0.069* | 0.035 | -0.052* | 0.018 | 0.053 | 0.126 | -0.039 | 0.238 | |||
人口分布 | 0.001 | 0.966 | -0.002 | 0.921 | 0.001 | 0.976 | 0.001 | 0.912 |
Table 4 Results of correlation analysis of influencing factors of Ⅰ and Ⅲ quadrants in Ili River Valley
自变量 | 高脆弱-高供给区 (Ⅰ) | 低脆弱-低供给区 (Ⅲ) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVI | ESV | EVI | ESV | ||||||||
r | p | r | p | r | p | r | p | ||||
植被覆盖度 | -0.529** | 0 | 0.387** | 0 | -0.369** | 0 | 0.229** | 0 | |||
土地利用类型 | -0.128* | 0.012 | 0.107** | 0 | -0.498** | 0 | 0.401** | 0 | |||
人均生产总值 | 0.287** | 0 | -0.393** | 0 | 0.161** | 0 | -0.202** | 0 | |||
土壤湿度 | -0.133** | 0.009 | 0.15** | 0 | -0.251** | 0 | 0.194** | 0 | |||
牧羊单位密度 | 0.167** | 0 | -0.152** | 0 | 0.188** | 0 | -0.089* | 0.038 | |||
热度 | 0.273** | 0 | -0.038* | 0.039 | 0.043 | 0.167 | -0.078 | 0.06 | |||
坡度 | 0.098* | 0.029 | -0.049* | 0.021 | 0.083* | 0.049 | -0.061 | 0.131 | |||
坡向 | 0.069* | 0.035 | -0.052* | 0.018 | 0.053 | 0.126 | -0.039 | 0.238 | |||
人口分布 | 0.001 | 0.966 | -0.002 | 0.921 | 0.001 | 0.976 | 0.001 | 0.912 |
[1] | ADGER W N, 2006. Vulnerability[J]. Global Environmental Change, 16(3): 268-281. |
[2] | COSTANZA R, ANGE R, DE GROOT R, et al., 1977. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 387(6630): 253-260. |
[3] | KWARTENG P, CHAVEZ A, 1989. Extracting spectral contrast in Landsat thematic mapper image data using selective principal component analysis[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 55(1): 339-348. |
[4] | LI J, LIANG J X, WU Y, et al., 2020. Quantitative evaluation of ecological cumulative effect in mining area using a pixel-based time series model of ecosystem service value[J]. Ecological Indicators, 3(9): 1-14. |
[5] | SHAN W, JIN X B, REN J, et al., 2019. Ecological environment quality assessment based on remote sensing data for land consolidation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(23): 1-13. |
[6] | XIONG Y, XU W H, LU N, et al., 2021. Assessment of spatial-temporal changes of ecological environment quality based on RSEI and GEE: A case study in Erhai Lake Basin, Yunnan province, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 4(3): 1-10. |
[7] | YI F, LU Q, LI Y H, et al., 2023. Ecological vulnerability assessment of natural oasis in arid areas: Application to Dunhuang, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 22(3): 1470-1496. |
[8] | ZHANG M N, AO Y, LIU M, et al., 2022. Ecological security assessment based on ecosystem service value and ecological footprint in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 6(10): 1470-1492. |
[9] | ZHANG Y, ZHENG M R, QIN B, 2023. Optimization of spatial layout based on ESV-FLUS model from the perspective of “Production-Living-Ecological”: A case study of Wuhan city[J]. Ecological Modelling, 22(3): 1-12. |
[10] | 成超男, 胡杨, 冯尧, 等, 2020. 基于CA-Markov模型的城市生态分区构建研究——以晋中主城区为例[J]. 生态学报, 40(4): 1455-1462. |
CHENG C N, HU Y, FENG Y, et al., 2020. Research on the construction of urban ecological zoning based on CA-Markov model: Taking the main urban area of Jinzhong as an example[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(4): 1455-1462. | |
[11] | 曹辰, 杨国林, 锁旭宏, 等, 2022. 基于遥感生态指数的阜新市生态环境变化分析[J]. 西北林学院学报, 37(2): 200-207. |
CAO C, YANG G L, SUO X H, et al., 2022. Analysis of ecological environment changes in Fuxin city based on remote sensing ecological indices[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 37(2): 200-207. | |
[12] |
范德芹, 邱玥, 孙文彬, 等, 2021. 基于遥感生态指数的神府矿区生态环境评价[J]. 测绘通报 (7): 23-28.
DOI |
FAN D Q, QIU Y, SUN W B, et al., 2021. Evaluation of the ecological environment of the Shenfu mining area based on remote sensing ecological indices[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping (7): 23-28. | |
[13] | 郭峰, 肖家光, 田鹏, 等, 2022. 大亚湾及大鹏半岛沿岸造礁石珊瑚现状与生态脆弱性评价[J]. 应用海洋学学报, 41(4): 568-582. |
GUO F, XIAO J G, TIAN P, et al., 2022. Status and ecological vulnerability assessment of reef-building corals in Daya Bay and Dapeng Peninsula coastal reefs[J]. Journal of Applied Oceanography, 41(4): 568-582. | |
[14] | 何丽华, 李建松, 王熙, 等, 2022. 水源保护区的生态脆弱性及生态修复成效分析[J]. 测绘科学, 47(8): 59-69. |
HE L H, LI J S, WANG X, et al., 2022. Analysis of ecological vulnerability and effectiveness of ecological restoration in water source protection areas[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 47(8): 59-69. | |
[15] |
李茂林, 闫庆武, 李桂娥, 2022. 基于EVI的锡林郭勒生态脆弱性评价[J]. 测绘通报 (10): 21-27.
DOI |
LI M L, YAN Q W, LI G E, 2022. EVI-based ecological vulnerability assessment of Xilingol[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping (10): 21-27. | |
[16] | 马云飞, 李建平, 陈长胜, 等, 2023. 长白山地区遥感生态指数时空变化及其气候响应[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 17(2): 91-97. |
MA Y F, LI J P, CHEN C S, et al., 2023. Spatial and temporal variations of remotely sensed ecological indices and their climatic response in the Changbaishan region[J]. Desert and Oasis Meteorology, 17(2): 91-97. | |
[17] | 尼亚孜海尼木·肖开提江, 马倩, 包安明, 等, 2023. 基于地理探测器的艾比湖流域生态脆弱性评价及驱动力分析[J]. 水生态学杂志, 22(5): 1-15. |
XIAOKAITIJIANG N Y Z H N M, MA Q, BAO A M, et al., 2023. Geodetector-based ecological vulnerability assessment and driving force analysis of the Abbey Lake Basin[J]. Journal of Hydroecology, 22(5): 1-15. | |
[18] | 乔斌, 曹晓云, 孙玮婕, 等, 2023. 基于生态系统服务价值和景观生态风险的生态分区识别与优化策略——以祁连山国家公园青海片区为例[J]. 生态学报, 43(3): 986-1004. |
QIAO B, CAO X Y, SUN W J, et al., 2023. Identification and optimisation strategies of ecological zoning based on ecosystem service value and landscape ecological risks: A case study of Qinghai area of Qilian Mountain National Park[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(3): 986-1004. | |
[19] | 王舒, 张骞, 王子芳, 等, 2022. 基于GIS的三峡库区生态风险评估及生态分区构建[J]. 生态学报, 42(11): 4654-4664. |
WANG S, ZHANG Q, WANG Z F, et al., 2022. GIS-based ecological risk assessment and ecological zoning construction in the Three Gorges reservoir area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(11): 4654-4664. | |
[20] | 武帅, 田冰, 顾世杰, 等, 2023. 基于PSRM模型的京津冀地区生态脆弱性时空演变[J]. 环境科学, 44(10): 5630-5640. |
WU S, TIAN B, GU S J, et al., 2023. Spatial and temporal evolution of ecological vulnerability in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on the PSRM model[J]. Environmental Science, 44(10): 5630-5640. | |
[21] | 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等, 2008. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 23(5): 911-919. |
XIE G D, ZHEN L, LU C X, et al., 2008. An expert knowledge-based approach to the valorisation of ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 23(5): 911-919. | |
[22] | 徐涵秋, 2013a. 区域生态环境变化的遥感评价指数[J]. 中国环境科学, 33(5): 889-897. |
XU H Q, 2013a. Remote sensing evaluation index for regional ecological changes[J]. China Environmental Science, 33(5): 889-897. | |
[23] | 徐涵秋, 2013b. 城市遥感生态指数的创建及其应用[J]. 生态学报, 33(24): 7853-7862. |
XU H Q, 2013b. Creation of an urban remote sensing ecological index and its application[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(24): 7853-7862. | |
[24] | 云婧, 2022. 内蒙古黄河流域湿地景观格局变化及其对湿地生态系统服务价值的影响研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古大学:17-33. |
YUN J, 2022. Changes in landscape patterns of wetlands in the Yellow River Basin of Inner Mongolia and their impacts on the value of wetland ecosystem services[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University:17-33. | |
[25] | 郑慧玲, 王永红, 马卫, 2022. 基于PSR模型的珠江三角洲生态环境脆弱性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 42(4): 210-217. |
ZHENG H L, WANG Y H, MA W, 2022. Evaluation of ecological vulnerability of the Pearl River Delta based on PSR modelling[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 42(4): 210-217. |
[1] | LI Rongjie, LI Huimei, WU Feifei, ZHAO mingde, WANG Shihan, SUN xueying. Study on the Spatial Differentiation Pattern and Driving Force of Ecosystem Services in Qinghai Lake Basin [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2024, 33(2): 301-309. |
[2] | WANG Chengwu, LUO Junjie, TANG Honghu. Analysis on the Driving Force of Spatial and Temporal Differentiation of Carbon Storage in the Taihang Mountains Based on InVEST Model [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(2): 215-225. |
[3] | XIAO Chengzhi, JI Yang, LI Jianzhong, ZHANG Zhi, BA Renji, CAO Yating. Spatial and Temporal Differentiation of Ecological Vulnerability and Interaction Effects of Driving Factors in the Upper reaches of the Minjiang River: A Case Study of the Zagunao River Basin [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(10): 1760-1770. |
[4] | FU Rong, WU Xinmei, CHEN Bin. Analysis on the Spatial Stratified Heterogeneity and Driving Factors Differences of the Urban Land Surface Temperature: A Case Study of Hefei [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(1): 110-122. |
[5] | ZHENG Xiaohao, CHEN Yingbiao, ZHENG Zihao, GUO Cheng, HUANG Zhounan, ZHOU Yongshi. Dynamic Changes of Ecosystem Service Value and Evolution of Its Influencing Factors in Hubei Province [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2023, 32(1): 195-206. |
[6] | LIU Xianghua, WANG Xiuming, LIU Xuchen, ZHANG Yinbo, LIU Piao. Ecological Compensation Mechanism Study of Guangdong Province Based on Spilled Ecosystem Service Value [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(5): 1024-1031. |
[7] | YANG Yan, ZHOU Decheng, GONG Zhaoning, LIU Ziyuan, ZHANG Liangxia. Ecological Vulnerability and Its Drivers of the Loess Plateau Based on Vegetation Productivity [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2022, 31(10): 1951-1958. |
[8] | WANG Lixia, SHI Yuanli, ZHANG Hongwei, BI Xiaoling, SHEN Wenming, MA Wandong. Analysis of Vegetation Ecological Function Changes and Driving Factors in Farming-pastoral Ecotone in Northern China from 2000 to 2020 [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2021, 30(10): 1990-1998. |
[9] | LEI Jinrui, CHEN Zongzhu, CHEN Yiqing, CHEN Xiaohua, LI Yuanling, WU Tingtian. Dynamic Analysis of Wetland Landscape Ecological Security Pattern of Hainan Island in 1990‒2018 [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2020, 29(2): 293-302. |
[10] | LEI Jinrui, CHEN Zongzhu, CHEN Yiqing, CHEN Xiaohua, LI Yuanling, WU Tingtian. Landscape Pattern Changes and Driving Factors Analysis of Wetland in Hainan Island during 1990-2018 [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2020, 29(1): 59-70. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA
Address:No. 6 Liupukang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R.China, 510650
Tel: 86-010-62067128, 86-010-62067137, 86-010-62067139
Fax: 86-10-62067130
Email: syxb@cnpc.com.cn
Support byBeijing Magtech Co.ltd, E-mail:support@magtech.com.cn