山东省矿区多维度土地利用转型对生态系统服务的空间异质驱动效应

doi:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.04.007

生态环境学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 563-574.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2026.04.007

山东省矿区多维度土地利用转型对生态系统服务的空间异质驱动效应

付智华¹(), 张捍卫²^,^*(), 王晶¹

¹ 吕梁学院资源与机械工程系，山西吕梁 033000
² 山东理工大学建筑工程与空间信息学院，山东淄博 255000

收稿日期:2025-08-13 修回日期:2025-11-30 接受日期:2026-02-12 出版日期:2026-04-18 发布日期:2026-04-14
通讯作者: *E-mail: zhanwei800@163.com
作者简介:付智华（1987年生），女，助教，硕士，研究方向自然资源调查与监测等方面的工作。E-mail: FZH198721@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(12473068)

Spatial Heterogeneous Driving Effects of Multi-dimensional Land Use Transition on Ecosystem Services in Mining Areas of Shandong Province

FU Zhihua¹(), ZHANG Hanwei²^,^*(), WANG Jing¹

¹ Department of Resources and Mechanical Engineering, Lüliang University, Lüliang 033000, P. R. China
² School of Civil Engineering and Spatial Information, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, P. R. China

Received:2025-08-13 Revised:2025-11-30 Accepted:2026-02-12 Online:2026-04-18 Published:2026-04-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

矿区土地利用转型导致的生态退化正严重制约资源型城市可持续发展进程。为揭示资源型地区土地利用转型与生态系统服务的动态互馈机制，以山东省典型煤矿区为研究对象，构建“结构－强度－动态”多维分析框架，揭示1990－2020年土地利用演变及其生态效应。基于InVEST模型评估四项关键的生态系统服务，结合地理探测器和空间自相关方法，阐明土地利用转型对生态系统服务格局的驱动机制。结果表明，1）1990－2020年矿区耕地减少6.08%，建设用地扩张7.68%，水体在1990－2000年因采煤沉陷增长2.71%；土地利用强度中低值区占比65.39%，部分矿区高值区扩张6.90%。2）生态系统服务呈现“北降南稳”，碳储量、生境质量和产水量分别下降12.3%、9.7%和15.8%，部分矿区退化显著。3）土地利用强度对生态系统服务解释力最强（q>0.65），部分矿区形成“高转型强度-高生态退化”集聚区。研究表明，隐性转型维度主导生态系统服务空间异质性，科学调控土地利用转型可有效缓解人类活动对生态系统服务的影响，为矿区生态修复提供了多维调控依据。

关键词: 土地利用转型, 生态系统服务, 地理探测器, 空间自相关, 典型煤矿区

Abstract:

Ecological degradation caused by land use transition in mining areas is severely restricting the sustainable development of resource cities. To reveal the dynamic feedback mechanism between land use transition and ecosystem services in resource-based regions, this study took typical coal mining areas in Shandong Province as the research object, constructed a “structure intensity dynamics” multi-dimensional analysis framework, and explored land use evolution and its ecological effects from 1990 to 2020. Based on the InVEST model, four key ecosystem services were evaluated, and combined with the geographical detector and spatial autocorrelation methods, the driving mechanism of land use transition on the pattern of ecosystem services was clarified. The results showed that: 1) from 1990 to 2020, cultivated land in the mining areas decreased by 6.08%, construction land expanded by 7.68%, and water bodies increased by 2.71% due to coal mining subsidence; areas with medium and low land use intensity accounted for 65.39%, and the high-value areas (mining areas 1 and 5) expanded by 6.90%. 2) Ecosystem services showed a pattern of “decline in the north and stability in the south”; carbon storage, habitat quality, and water yield decreased by 12.3%, 9.7%, and 15.8%, respectively, with significant degradation in mining areas 3 and 6. 3) Land use intensity had the strongest explanatory power for ecosystem services (q>0.65), and mining areas 5 and 6 formed agglomerations characterized by “high transition intensity and high ecological degradation”. The study indicates that the implicit transition dimension dominates the spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services, and scientific regulation of land use transition can effectively alleviate the impact of human activities on ecosystem services, providing a multi-dimensional regulatory basis for ecological restoration in mining areas.

Key words: land use transformation, ecosystem services, geographical detector, spatial autocorrelation, typical coal mining areas

中图分类号:

付智华, 张捍卫, 王晶. 山东省矿区多维度土地利用转型对生态系统服务的空间异质驱动效应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(4): 563-574.

FU Zhihua, ZHANG Hanwei, WANG Jing. Spatial Heterogeneous Driving Effects of Multi-dimensional Land Use Transition on Ecosystem Services in Mining Areas of Shandong Province[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2026, 35(4): 563-574.

图/表 9

图1 研究区概况图

Figure 1 Overview of the study area map

图2 1990－2020年山东矿区土地利用时空分布

Figure 2 Spatiotemporal distribution of landuse in Shandong mining area from 1990 to 2020

图3 土地利用转型时空分布

Figure 3 Spatiotemporal distribution of land use transition

图4 1990－2020年不同生态系统服务时空分布特征

Figure 4 Spatiotemporal distribution of ecosystem services from 1990 to 2020

表1 土地利用转型3个维度对生态系统服务因子的独立影响

Table 1 Effects of three dimensions of land use transition on ecosystem service factors

土地利用转型	CS	HQ	SD	WY
L_s	0.0327	0.0479	0.0014*	0.0045*
L_i	0.1578	0.2159	0.0018*	0.1221
L_d	0.1274	0.1808	0.0012*	0.1100

表2 土地利用转型3个维度对生态系统服务因子影响的异质性差异

Table 2 Differences in the impact of three dimensions of land use transformation on ecosystem service factors

生态系统服务土地利用转型	CS		HQ		SD		WY
生态系统服务土地利用转型	L_s	L_i	L_s	L_i	L_s	L_i	L_s	L_i
L_i	Y		Y		Y		Y
L_d	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y

表3 土地利用转型3个维度对生态系统服务因子的交互影响

Table 3 Interactive effects of three dimensions of land use transition on ecosystem service factors

交互作用	CS	HQ	SD	WY
L_s∩L_i	0.2384	0.3581	0.0062	0.1702
L_i∩L_d	0.1717	0.2299	0.0033	0.1528
L_d∩L_s	0.1487	0.2279	0.0024	0.1394

表4 土地利用转型3个维度与各生态系统服务因子之间的全局双变量莫兰指数值

Table 4 Global bivariate Moran’s index between the three dimensions of land use transformation and each ecosystem service factor

土地利用转型	CS	HQ	SD	WY
L_s	−0.001	−0.002	−0.002	0.009
L_i	0.002	0.003	0.005	−0.016
L_d	−0.002	−0.001	−0.001	−0.037

图5 土地利用转型变化与生态系统服务因子之间的相关性聚类图

Figure 5 Correlation cluster diagram between land use transformation and ecosystem service factors

参考文献 46

[1]	BUDYKO M I, MILLER D H, 1974. Climate and life[M]. New York: Academic Press: 508.
[2]	CHEN Y, ZHU M, LU J, et al., 2020. Evaluation of ecological city and analysis of obstacle factors under the background of high-quality development: Taking cities in the Yellow River Basin as examples[J]. Ecological Indicators, 118: 106771. DOI URL
[3]	COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al., 1997. The value of the World’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 387(6630): 253-260. DOI
[4]	DE GROOT R S, WILSON M A, BOUMANS R M, 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services[J]. Ecological Economics, 41(3): 393-408. DOI URL
[5]	EHRLICH P R, EHRLICH A H, 1981. The causes and consequences of the disappearance of species[J]. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 1: 82-85.
[6]	FENG X H, LI Y, WANG X Z, et al., 2023. Impacts of land use transitions on ecosystem services: A research framework coupled with structure, function, and dynamics[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 901: 166366. DOI URL
[7]	GRAINGER A, 1995. The forest transition: An alternative approach[J]. Area, 27(3): 242-251.
[8]	HUA H M, CHEN X Y, ZHANG X Y, 2025. Carbon effects of land use transitions: A process-mechanism-future perspective[J]. Earth Science Informatics, 18(2): 1-19. DOI
[9]	JI X L, SUN Y L, GUO W, et al., 2023. Land use and habitat quality change in the Yellow River Basin: A perspective with different CMIP6-based scenarios and multiple scales[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 345: 118729. DOI URL
[10]	LONG H L, QU Y, 2018. Land Use Transitions and land management: A mutual feedback perspective[J]. Land Use Policy, 74: 111-120. DOI URL
[11]	SHARP R, TALLIS H T, RICKETTS T, et al., 2015. Invest 3.2.0 User’S Guide[M]. Stanford, CA: The Natural Capital Project: 133.
[12]	SONG X J, CHEN F, SUN Y, et al., 2024. Effects of land utilization transformation on ecosystem services in urban agglomeration on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 162: 112046. DOI URL
[13]	SU R, DUAN C C, CHEN B, 2024. The shift in the spatiotemporal relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services and its drivers in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 365: 121698. DOI URL
[14]	WANG J N, WU W J, YANG M, et al., 2024. Exploring the complex trade-offs and synergies of global ecosystem services[J]. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 21: 100391. DOI URL
[15]	XIAO W, HU Z Q, FU Y H, 2014. Zoning of land reclamation in coal mining area and new progresses for the past 10 Years[J]. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 1(2): 177-183.
[16]	YAN F P, SHANGGUAN W, ZHANG J, et al., 2020. Depth-to-bedrock map of China at a spatial resolution of 100 meters[J]. Scientific Data, 7(1): 2. DOI
[17]	YANG J, HUANG X, 2021. The 30 M Annual land cover and its Dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019[J]. Earth System Science Data Discussions, 13(8): 3907-3925.
[18]	ZHANG X Y, CHEN X Y, ZHOU Y Z, et al., 2024. Prediction of the temporal and spatial evolution of subsidence waters in the Huainan Mining area based on the CA-Markov model[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27: 17307-17327. DOI
[19]	ZHANG X Y, ZHOU Y Z, LONG L L, et al., 2023. Prediction of the spatiotemporal evolution of vegetation cover in the Huainan Mining area and quantitative analysis of driving factors[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(6): 776. DOI PMID
[20]	ZHENG H L, ZHENG H F, 2023. Assessment and prediction of carbon storage based on land use/land cover dynamics in the coastal area of Shandong Province[J]. Ecological Indicators, 153: 110474. DOI URL
[21]	郭洪伟, 孙小银, 廉丽姝, 等, 2016. 基于CLUE-S和InVEST模型的南四湖流域生态系统产水功能对土地利用变化的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 27(9): 2899-2906. DOI
	GUO H W, SUN X Y, LIAN L S, et al., 2016. Response of water yield function to land use change in Nansi Lake basin based on CLUE-S and InVEST models[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 27(9): 2899-2906. DOI
[22]	胡炳南, 郭文砚, 2018. 我国采煤沉陷区现状、综合治理模式及治理建议[J]. 煤矿开采, 23(2): 1-4.
	HU B N, GUO W Y, 2018. Current situation, comprehensive treatment models and suggestions for coal mining subsidence areas in China[J]. Coal Mining Technology, 23(2): 1-4.
[23]	胡振琪, 张明亮, 马保国, 等, 2009. 粉煤灰防治煤矸石酸性与重金属复合污染[J]. 煤炭学报, 34(1): 79-83.
	HU Z Q, ZHANG M L, MA B G, et al., 2009. Using fly Ash to control acid and heavy metal composite pollution from coal gangue[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 34(1): 79-83.
[24]	黄木易, 汤玉茹, 郭芹, 等, 2025. 基于权衡协同效应的安徽省生态功能区识别及情景模拟[J]. 中国环境科学, 45(1): 450-464.
	HUANG M Y, TANG Y R, GUO Q, et al., 2025. Identification and scenario simulation of ecological functional zones in Anhui Province based on trade-off and synergy effects[J]. China Environmental Science, 45(1): 450-464.
[25]	黄贤凤, 勾容, 苏维词, 2025. 贵州省生态系统服务权衡/协同与簇情景模拟[J]. 中国环境科学, 45(2): 966-980.
	HUANG X F, GOU R, SU W C, 2025. Trade-offs/synergies and cluster scenario simulation of ecosystem services in Guizhou Province[J]. China Environmental Science, 45(2): 966-980.
[26]	李媛媛, 尹珂, 2025. 重庆市中心城区碳储存服务评估: InVEST模型和ARIES模型对比分析[J]. 生态学报, 45(4): 1575-1587.
	LI Y Y, YIN K, 2025. Assessment of carbon storage services in Chongqing urban center: A comparative analysis of InVEST and ARIES models[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 45(4): 1575-1587.
[27]	刘辉, 朱晓峻, 程桦, 等, 2021. 高潜水位采煤沉陷区人居环境与生态重构关键技术: 以安徽淮北绿金湖为例[J]. 煤炭学报, 46(12): 4021-4032.
	LIU H, ZHU X J, CHENG H, et al., 2021. Key technologies for human settlement environment and ecological reconstruction in high groundwater level coal mining subsidence area: A case study of Lvjin Lake in Huaibei, Anhui[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 46(12): 4021-4032.
[28]	刘纪远, 1997. 国家资源环境遥感宏观调查与动态监测研究[J]. 遥感学报, 1(3): 225-230.
	LIU J Y, 1997. Macro-scale survey and dynamic monitoring of national resources and environment by remote sensing[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 1(3): 225-230.
[29]	龙花楼, 李秀彬, 2002. 区域土地利用转型分析——以长江沿线样带为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 17(2): 144-149.
	LONG H L, LI X B, 2002. Analysis of regional land use transition: A case study in transect of the Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 17(2): 144-149.
[30]	欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿, 1999. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J]. 生态学报, 19(5): 19-25.
	OUYANG Z Y, WANG X K, MIAO H, 1999. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 19(5): 19-25.
[31]	潘健峰, 马月伟, 蔡思青, 等, 2023. SolVES模型在生态系统服务功能社会价值评估中的应用[J]. 世界林业研究, 36(1): 20-25.
	PAN J F, MA Y W, CAI S Q, et al., 2023. Application of SolVES model in assessing social values of ecosystem services[J]. World Forestry Research, 36(1): 20-25.
[32]	庞萬隆, 冀鹏浩, 庞立东, 等, 2024. 内蒙古大兴安岭土地利用格局和生态系统服务功能的时空演变特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 44(4): 340-351.
	PANG W L, JI P H, PANG L D, et al., 2024. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of land use patterns and ecosystem services in Greater Khingan Mountains of Inner Mongolia[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 44(4): 340-351.
[33]	彭云妮, 桑会勇, 翟亮, 等, 2024. 基于InVEST模型的京津冀土地利用变化及碳储量时空分异研究[J]. 测绘通报 (1): 19-24. DOI
	PENG Y N, SANG H Y, ZHAI L, et al., 2024. Spatiotemporal differentiation of land use change and carbon storage in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on InVEST model[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping (1): 19-24.
[34]	孙灏, 胡佳琪, 崔雅静, 等, 2021. 基于多源遥感数据的生态系统服务功能时空演变趋势分析[J]. 测绘通报 (4): 1-7. DOI
	SUN H, HU J Q, CUI Y J, et al., 2021. Spatiotemporal evolution trend analysis of ecosystem services based on multi-source remote sensing data[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping (4): 1-7. DOI
[35]	孙汇颖, 宫巧巧, 刘庆果, 等, 2022. 基于土地利用变化的山东省生境质量时空演变特征[J]. 土壤通报, 53(5): 1019-1028.
	SUN H Y, GONG Q Q, LIU Q G, et al., 2022. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of habitat quality in Shandong Province based on land use change[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 53(5): 1019-1028.
[36]	孙亚军, 陈歌, 徐智敏, 等, 2020. 我国煤矿区水环境现状及矿井水处理利用研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报, 45(1): 304-316.
	SUN Y J, CHEN G, XU Z M, et al., 2020. Current status of water environment and research progress of mine water treatment and utilization in coal mining areas of China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 45(1): 304-316.
[37]	王劲峰, 徐成东, 2017. 地理探测器: 原理与展望[J]. 地理学报, 72(1): 116-134. DOI
	WANG J F, XU C D, 2017. Geodetector: Principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(1): 116-134. DOI
[38]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等, 2015. 中国生态系统服务的价值[J]. 资源科学, 37(9): 1740-1746.
	XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG C S, et al., 2015. The value of ecosystem services in China[J]. Resources Science, 37(9): 1740-1746.
[39]	杨君, 刘畅, 袁淑君, 等, 2025. 不同空间尺度耕地利用转型碳排放及其影响因素——以湖南省为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 45(1): 264-275.
	YANG J, LIU C, YUAN S J, et al., 2025. Carbon emissions from cultivated land use transition at different spatial scales and their influencing factors: A case study of Hunan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 45(1): 264-275.
[40]	杨小琬, 张丽君, 秦耀辰, 等, 2022. 1995年以来黄河下游碳储量时空变化及驱动因素[J]. 河南大学学报(自然科学版), 52(1): 20-33.
	YANG X W, ZHANG L J, QIN Y C, et al., 2022. Spatiotemporal changes and driving factors of carbon storage in the lower Yellow River since 1995[J]. Journal of Henan University (Natural Science), 52(1): 20-33.
[41]	姚小薇, 曾杰, 李旺君, 2015. 武汉城市圈城镇化与土地生态系统服务价值空间相关特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 31(9): 249-256.
	YAO X W, ZENG J, LI W J, 2015. Spatial correlation characteristics between urbanization and land ecosystem service value in Wuhan metropolitan area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 31(9): 249-256.
[42]	游桂璇, 王沛然, 曹嘉铄, 等, 2025. 资源型城市土地利用和生态系统服务功能的时空变化与耦合效应分析[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 45(1): 117-127.
	YOU G X, WANG P R, CAO J S, et al., 2025. Spatiotemporal changes and coupling effects of land use and ecosystem services in resource-based cities[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Sciences), 45(1): 117-127.
[43]	张旭阳, 刘英, 龙林丽, 等, 2022. 干旱半干旱区采煤沉陷引起的土壤水分变化及其对植物生理生态潜在影响分析综述[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 48(4): 415-425.
	ZHANG X Y, LIU Y, LONG L L, et al., 2022. Review on soil moisture changes induced by coal mining subsidence in arid and semi-arid areas and their potential impacts on plant eco-physiology[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 48(4): 415-425.
[44]	张增奇, 梁吉坡, 李增学, 等, 2015. 山东省煤炭资源与赋煤规律研究[J]. 地质学报, 89(12): 2351-2362.
	ZHANG Z Q, LIANG J P, LI Z X, et al., 2015. Study on coal resources and coal accumulation regularity in Shandong Province[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 89(12): 2351-2362.
[45]	赵艳玲, 丁宝亮, 何厅厅, 等, 2022. 基于Google Earth Engine的采煤沉陷水体方向变化自动识别[J]. 煤炭学报, 47(7): 2745-2755.
	ZHAO Y L, DING B L, HE T T, et al., 2022. Automatic identification of water body direction changes in coal mining subsidence areas based on Google Earth Engine[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 47(7): 2745-2755.
[46]	郑慧慧, 宋月琪, 魏宸博, 等, 2025. 阿克苏地区近30年土地利用变化及其生态环境效应研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 30(4): 217-229.
	ZHENG H H, SONG Y Q, WEI C B, et al., 2025. Land use change and its eco-environmental effects in Aksu Region over the past 30 Years[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 30(4): 217-229.

山东省矿区多维度土地利用转型对生态系统服务的空间异质驱动效应

Spatial Heterogeneous Driving Effects of Multi-dimensional Land Use Transition on Ecosystem Services in Mining Areas of Shandong Province

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 46

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	秦群策, 李连伟, 郑直. 基于SRP模型的青岛市生态脆弱性时空演变分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(4): 540-550.
[2]	斯琴, 武友德, 王涛, 崔红茶, 潘莹, 刘宇斯. 云南省城镇化与生态系统服务异速关系及互动机制[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(3): 488-498.
[3]	崔丽洋, 张磊, 贾夏, 赵永华, 穆琪, 司绍诚. 结合生态系统服务的南疆盐碱地土壤质量评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(2): 245-255.
[4]	慕浩枫, 宋喆禄, 高镇, 侯鹰, 陈卫平. 基于生态系统服务供需的城市PM_2.5污染风险时间变化特征与影响因素分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(2): 256-266.
[5]	韩念龙, 张镇林, 高浩嘉, 彭安琪, 纪家慧. 基于自组织映射神经网络的东江流域生态服务簇识别与功能分区[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(2): 289-297.
[6]	黄纪星, 刘婉仪, 杨舒棋, 朱玮晗, 臧元瑞, 戴永务, 林金煌. 将生态系统服务纳入耕地多功能的权衡协同评估和分区管理[J]. 生态环境学报, 2026, 35(1): 40-53.
[7]	王秀玲, 金翠, 王浩然, 候明璇. 辽宁省植被时空变化特征及其对极端气候的响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(9): 1410-1420.
[8]	林卫, 周金星, 何荣晓, 陈宗铸, 陈毅青, 王韫镭, 钟云芳, 雷金睿. 琼北地区“三生”空间生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动因素探测[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(8): 1317-1328.
[9]	丁馨, 刘健, 魏俐宏, 解德威, 郑昭佩. 基于GSMSR模型的山东省植被NEP时空格局及影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(7): 1079-1089.
[10]	于倩茹, 裴厦, 刘春兰, 乔青, 郑方钰, 朱林红. 基于多维视角的北京市生态系统调节服务稀缺性评估及其空间聚集特征研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(7): 1133-1146.
[11]	石镕瑞, 杨小雄, 马骥, 黄珊珊, 杨玥, 卢盛权, 吴广. 滇桂黔石漠化片区生态环境质量时空演变及驱动力分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(7): 1147-1162.
[12]	黄霄宇, 李欢欢, 王新宇, 王进欣. 中国黄泛区生态系统服务供需匹配特征及冲突识别[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(6): 863-875.
[13]	周瑞娇, 张虹, 钱敏. 近30年三峡库区生态系统服务流时空演变与影响因素研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(6): 876-887.
[14]	王天雯, 罗明良, 白雷超. 嘉陵江流域生态系统服务动态变化及权衡协同分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(6): 888-901.
[15]	杨昊彧, 黄康江, 陈晓东, 赵劼, 熊军, 田康. 贵州省生态空间效率演变及景观格局的影响归因[J]. 生态环境学报, 2025, 34(6): 902-913.